Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Tech

The Wichita Lineman Walks Out of The Hidden Fortress, Dodges Godzilla, Grabs a Dog at Rutt’s Hut, and Ends Up in the Cuckoo’s Nest: Editor’s Round-Up

Published

on

AXPONA is over. Passover is done. The Stanley Cup Playoffs are underway, which is always a beautiful time of year unless you’re a Toronto Maple Leafs fan, in which case it’s just another annual reminder that hope is a renewable resource and results are not.

So I did what any rational person does. I got in the car and tried to drive.

Three hours later I was still in New Jersey, locked in traffic like it was a civic duty, leaning on Qobuz and the NHL Network to keep me from turning the steering wheel into modern art. The stereo in my Toyota SUV did not help. It is not just bad. It is hostile. Flat, lifeless, and oddly aggressive in how it strips the soul out of anything you feed it. I have heard better sound quality from hold music and from relatives calling to critique my life choices. At least they bring some midrange.

Which is why the arrival of the 2026 Mazda CX-5 Premium cannot come soon enough. The Bose system alone is reason to celebrate. Clarity. Separation. Actual bass that does not feel like a rumor. A car where music sounds like music and not a compressed apology for itself.

Advertisement

Because music matters. Especially when you are stuck and have no escape.

glen-campbell-1970-copy

Country is also where things fall apart. What passes for country today feels like it was assembled by committee in a conference room with a whiteboard and no sense of shame. I cannot do it. I will not do it. There are exceptions. Orville Peck gets a pass. Dolly Parton from an earlier era still hits. Tom Russell knows how to tell a story without sounding like he is selling me a truck.

And while we are clearing the table, let’s deal with the sacred cows. Eagles. I do not get it. Never have. Polished to the point of anesthesia. Give me Led Zeppelin, The Cure, or Guns N’ Roses any day.

And then there is Glen Campbell, who was not just good, he was essential. You can roll your eyes at “Rhinestone Cowboy,” fine, but “Wichita Lineman” is something else entirely. “I need you more than want you” is not just a lyric, it is a confession. Every word lands. It does not matter if you have never set foot in Kansas, although I have. The song pulls you there anyway. It makes you feel distance, longing, and the quiet weight of holding on to something that might already be gone, but hopefully isn’t.

Advertisement

That is what music is supposed to do. It reaches across time and geography and lands somewhere personal. Somewhere you do not always expect. In my case, it took me halfway across the world for a few minutes. Tokyo. A Japanese egg salad sandwich from 7-Eleven. Blonde hair. A mind that can navigate the dark side of the forest moon and come back with answers. Present without being present.

And it is also why, when you start looking at where some of our favorite stories really came from, you have to be willing to follow that thread wherever it leads.

The Kurosawa Blueprint That Built Star Wars

hiidden-fortress-screenshot

A long time ago, in a galaxy not so far away, Japan, a director named Akira Kurosawa made a film in 1958 that quietly rewrote the playbook. The Hidden Fortress did not need a marketing machine or a line of action figures. It just told a story with precision, perspective, and a structure that would echo a lot louder years later.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Fast forward to 1977. I am seven years old, sitting in a theater in Toronto, watching Star Wars with my friend Andrew Temes, completely unaware that my cinematic worldview was about to be rearranged. Like a lot of people, I did not just like it, I went all in. Thousands of dollars on memorabilia over the years. Stood in line, in the rain, to be the first one through the door in Canada for Return of the Jedi in 1983. Fast forward again and there I was in my late twenties, back on line for The Phantom Menace, which felt less like a return and more like a warning shot. Outside of Andor, Star Wars: The Clone WarsRogue One, and maybe Solo: A Star Wars Story, it has been a long stretch of Bantha-level disappointment since.

Advertisement

Then I found Kurosawa.

Throne of BloodSeven SamuraiYojimboHigh and LowThe Bad Sleep Well. One by one, they chipped away at that original belief. I own them all now, in more formats than I care to admit. But it was not until my twenties, sitting down with The Hidden Fortress, that the illusion finally cracked.

Because this is not subtle.

hidden-fortress-screenshot-2

The two bickering peasants framing the story? They are not just an influence — they are the blueprint for C3PO and R2-D2. The hidden princess, the reluctant general, the journey through enemy territory, the tonal shifts between danger and dark humor, it is all there. And visually, it is even harder to ignore. The samurai swords, katanas, are not just cousins to lightsabers, they are the DNA. The code of the samurai maps cleanly onto the Jedi. The warlord’s soldiers, with their helmets and rigid formations, look a little too familiar. Strip away the desert, add black armor, and you are staring at the Empire before it learned how to breathe through a mask.

Advertisement

Look, every director borrows. That is part of the job. Influence is how the medium evolves. But this goes further than influence. This is Imperial level theft.

It does not take anything away from what Star Wars became. It changed cinema. It changed my life. But it did not come from nowhere. And once you see where it came from, you cannot unsee it.

And here is where it gets uncomfortable. Han Solo suddenly feels a lot less original and a lot more like every reluctant hero Toshiro Mifune ever played. From the early postwar Kurosawa films to the sprawling samurai epics to even Red Beard, that swagger, that resistance, that eventual turn toward doing the right thing, it is all there.

Which raises the obvious question. What exactly did George Lucas bring to the table beyond scale and spectacle?

Advertisement
hiidden-fortress-screenshot-1

And while we are asking questions, let’s talk about endings. Kurosawa knew how to stage a death. Watch Throne of Blood. Arrows flying, body breaking down in real time, a human pin cushion before the term even existed. It is brutal, precise, unforgettable.

Lucas? Not exactly his strength.

Grief, Guilt, and the Monster We Deserved

godzilla-minus-one

Sitting down for Godzilla Minus One, I expected another traditional monster movie. I could not have been more wrong.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Set in the final days of World War II and the fragile years that follow, the film strips the franchise down to something far more uncomfortable than spectacle. This isn’t about cities getting flattened for fun. It’s about what’s left standing after everything that matters is already gone.

Advertisement

Kōichi Shikishima isn’t a hero. He’s a failed kamikaze pilot who makes a choice to live and then has to carry the weight of it. When he lands his Mitsubishi Zero on Odo Island claiming mechanical failure, the lie hangs in the air. The mechanic, Sōsaku Tachibana, sees right through him. And when Godzilla attacks that night, Shikishima freezes. He doesn’t fire. He survives. Everyone else doesn’t. That’s the wound the film never lets heal.

When he returns home, Tokyo is gone. His parents are gone. What he builds instead, a fragile, makeshift family with Noriko and the orphaned Akiko, feels less like a new beginning and more like borrowed time. He takes work on a minesweeper, cleaning up the literal leftovers of the war, while internally he’s still stuck in it.

ryunosuke-kamiki-as-koichi-shikishima

And then Godzilla comes back.

Not as a metaphor, not as a mascot, but as something far worse. Mutated and supercharged by American nuclear testing at Bikini Atoll, this version of Godzilla is a consequence. A continuation. The war didn’t end. It just changed shape. The U.S. steps back because of geopolitical tension. The Japanese government stays quiet to avoid panic. So the people left behind — the same ones already scraping together a life, are the ones who have to deal with it.

Advertisement

That’s the film.

Not the destruction, though there’s plenty of it. The Ginza sequence is devastating, not because of scale, but because of who gets caught in it. Noriko’s death isn’t a plot device. It’s the final break. Shikishima loses the one thing tethering him to something resembling a future, and what’s left is grief with a target.

The plan to stop Godzilla with Freon tanks, pressure, and improvisation feels almost secondary. It’s clever, grounded, and very Japanese in its resourcefulness, but the real story is whether Shikishima can find a reason to live that isn’t tied to dying for something.

That’s why this film works on a level that most Hollywood films do not. Kurosawa would have complained about the lighting in some scenes, but the tone and overall theme would have felt very familiar.

Advertisement

Made for a reported $10 to $15 million, it does more with restraint than the recent Hollywood entries have done with budgets ten times that size. The monster is used sparingly, and every appearance matters. There’s no filler. No winking at the audience. Just tension, consequence, and a very clear understanding of what Godzilla was always supposed to represent.

Seventy years into the franchise, this is the one that finally circles back to the source. Postwar trauma. Nuclear anxiety. Survivor’s guilt. The politics of rebuilding when nobody wants to admit how broken things still are.

I’ve seen almost all of them. Own more than I probably should.

Advertisement
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

This is the one that broke me in the theater after a year of personal upheaval and more than a few moments where doubt, loss, and betrayal had the upper hand.

Not handing it the Oscar was all you need to know about Hollywood.

The Last Honest Meal in a Crooked Economy

You know what’s actually life-affirming in the way Godzilla Minus One sneaks up on you? Not the destruction, but the rebuild. The small, human stuff that still works when everything else feels broken.

Advertisement

A good hot dog.

portillos-char-dog

And here’s the part nobody wants to say out loud: hot dogs are coming back because everything else got stupid expensive. Pizza pushing $30 a pie isn’t a luxury anymore — it’s a bad habit with a pocket full of receipts. Meanwhile, the hot dog never left its lane. Still relatively affordable. Still fast. Still satisfying in a way that doesn’t require a loan from your kid with 300,000 Instagram followers or a wine pairing.

AXPONA had rooms that cost more than most people’s homes, but step outside that world and reality looks a lot more like a paper tray and a line out the door. You don’t “elevate” a Chicago hot dog. You respect it. A proper char dog like the ones at Portillo’s, comes loaded the way it’s supposed to: tomato wedge, pickle spear, peppers, celery salt, mustard. No ketchup unless you’re looking to start a fight.

Back home in Jersey, that same no-nonsense energy shows up in different forms. Hiram’s Roadstand is the first stop in Fort Lee, which is better known these days for its Korean BBQ. Some of the greatest jazz musicians of the last century walked out of Van Gelder’s studio, sessions done, ears ringing, and headed straight down Route 9W to Hiram’s for something healthier than a cigarette and bottle of gin.

Flat-top dogs, nothing fancy, no attempt to impress anyone who doesn’t already get it. Hiram’s doesn’t care about your macros or your cleanse. It exists because it works.

Advertisement
rutts-hut

But somewhere along the way, curiosity or maybe poor judgment, pulls you deeper into North Jersey’s hot dog hierarchy. That’s how you end up at Rutt’s Hut.

Rutt’s isn’t just a stand. It’s a Jersey institution. The deep-fried “ripper” doesn’t try to charm you. The casing splits, the edges land at that exact point between crisp and snap, and suddenly you understand why people make the drive. For years, I kept my distance. Fried? Messy? Felt like a late-night decision best avoided. Turns out, I was late to the party.

The first bite resets expectations. Not refined. Not chasing any TikTok trends. The kind of food that doesn’t need explaining because it’s been right for decades.

onion-rings-hot-dogs-relish

And then the supporting cast shows up. Onion rings done the way they should be — no gimmicks, just the right amount of crisp. Add their homemade relish and mustard, and now you’re in deeper than you planned. It’s the kind of combination that makes everything else on the table feel optional. Better than Coke, honestly. And not the kind you drink sitting on the hood of your car in the parking lot of a 7-Eleven in Long Branch.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Now I understand why the wise guys made the detour to Clifton on their way to the Bing.

Advertisement

The System Says Sit Down. Mr. McMurphy Says Not Today

Driving home from Rutt’s Hutt takes patience these days because New Jersey is having a moment. Call it Hollywood East if you want. I live less than two miles from the new Netflix Studios Fort Monmouth, a $900 million project that’s already changing the rhythm of the Shore. Ten thousand people are expected to land here over the next couple of years, and some days it feels like half of Brooklyn beat them to it. The quiet streets by the ocean are not so quiet anymore. Sure, the house is worth a lot more now. So are the property taxes.

And when Hollywood comes knocking, waving $25,000 for two months of rent for some B-list actor you’ve never heard of, you don’t overthink it. You smile, take the check, and hope he doesn’t spiral into some performative meltdown after noticing the thirteen mezuzahs and the IDF Six Day War flag sitting behind glass in the office.

cuckoo-nest-vinyl-album-cover

Part of that drive home from North Jersey takes me past a hospital where I spent time as a patient. Not visiting. Staying. Which is why One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest never felt like fiction to me. It felt familiar. The nurse who made my life a misery. The routines. The slow grind of being told who you are supposed to be. I’ve talked about it publicly. No secrets left to protect.

At 56, I’m not interested in pretending that those chapters didn’t happen. They did. And it taught me something useful. You either let that kind of experience flatten you, or you learn how to direct it. I chose the second option. The energy that used to work against me now has a job. As Emperor Palpatine would say, it gives me “focus” and a very different perspective.

That doesn’t always sit well with people. I’m not built to fall in line or nod along when something doesn’t pass the smell test. I’m not interested in selling the idea that six figure systems are normal, or that spending more on cables than a car is a rational decision for most people.

Advertisement
michell-gryo-turntable-axpona-2026
Michell Gyro Turntable

I’m not here to play Westeros court politics or nod along while the room pretends everything makes sense. I’m closer to Han Solo than anything polished and obedient — shoot first, deal with the fallout later. And there’s a little Arya Stark in there too. I keep a list.

Driving past that hospital, thinking about where I’ve been and where I just was—rooms at AXPONA stacked with mid six figure systems, cables dressed like they have their own security detail — it starts making sense.

Maybe we’ve got the labels wrong.

Because if “normal” now means telling people this is the entry point, that this is what it takes to belong, then maybe the problem isn’t the audience.

We’ve spent too much time talking at people like they showed up without the right jacket and pair of white leather sneakers, pricing them out before they’ve heard a single note, and wrapping it all in language that sounds more like a late night pitch than anything connected to music. That’s not passion. That’s insulation.

Advertisement

And here’s the part that should make people a little uncomfortable. Not everyone is willing to take the little white pill with the cup of water anymore and nod along.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Some of us remember what this is supposed to be. Sanity isn’t just a state of being. It has an address.

And more people in this industry need to start finding it.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Motorola just dropped 5 new products, including the Samsung Galaxy-rivaling Razr Ultra 2026 series and Razr Fold

Published

on


  • Motorola just announced three new clamshell foldables, and confirmed the US availability of the Razr Fold and Moto Buds 2 Plus
  • All of these phones are coming to the US on May 21, with the Moto Buds 2 Plus landing on April 30
  • The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is arguably the highlight of these announcements, with a 7-inch foldable screen and three 50MP cameras

Motorola is having a busy day, as the company has just launched five devices, including phones and earbuds.

Leading the charge is the Motorola Razr 2026 family, which includes the base Motorola Razr 2026, the Motorola Razr Plus 2026, and the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026, as well as the previously announced Motorola Razr Fold (you can check out our first impressions of the Ultra in our hands-on Motorola Razr Ultra review).

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

5 TV Myths It’s Time To Stop Believing Once And For All

Published

on





We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

The television industry is worth a few hundred billion dollars, and it’s expected to smash past $500 billion by 2030. That sounds all very impressive, but a chunk of that comes not from selling pwople their dream TV, but from selling them things they don’t need. It’s not an accident, either; it’s a business model.

Buying a TV should be simple. You can confidently shop for a one online, or you can walk into a store, check out one that looks good, get the hard sell, and then take it home. But with the salesperson’s technical jargon and overinflated claims, you might get a feeling that you’ve bought more than you needed once you settle down on the couch to watch that first show  — or maybe you didn’t get the features you actually need. The problem is, many of us do not have the time or the technical knowledge to push back. Therefore, we trust the spec sheet and believe the salesperson, which can result in overspending. Manufacturers and retailers may very well count on exactly that to boost their sales figures.

Advertisement

To arm yourself before you go to the store, we’ve listed five of the most persistent myths in the world of TV buying. They’ve been repeated over and over to the point that they now feel like common sense. But are they? After debunking these myths, we hope you can save a little bit of money, whether you’re on the way to the store or contemplating your next purchase. Here are five TV myths it’s time to stop believing once and for all.

Advertisement

Myth: you need 4K on a small TV

Walk into any electronics store with the intention of buying a TV and salespeople will tell you that 4K is the essential viewing experience. They’re not wrong. However, if it’s a small TV you need (we’re talking 44 inches or under), you can save yourself a bit of cash by opting for a 1080p display instead, like that on the Roku Select Series FHD TV. That’s because researchers at the University of Cambridge and Meta Reality Labs say your eyes may not get any of that 4K benefit from a small screen. The explanation for this lies in how the human eye works. “Our brain doesn’t actually have the capacity to sense details in colour very well,” says Professor Rafał Mantiuk, co-author of the study. Our peepers can only process detail up to a certain point. Feed them more resolution than they can handle, and the signals sent to your brain won’t be that different from a lower resolution. 

The researchers measured pixels per degree (PPD), which isn’t how many pixels a screen has, but how a screen looks from your viewing position. For an average-sized living room with 2.5 meters between couch and screen, a 44-inch 4K TV offers little to no noticeable benefit over a lower-resolution QHD set of the same size. Knowing the point when you can tell the difference between 4K and 1080p could save you money — and the research team was so keen to assist people with this that they made an online calculator to help. Just enter the necessary details, and it will tell you exactly what resolution is actually beneficial to your eyes.

Advertisement

Myth: you need premium HDMI cables

Cable manufacturers will try to convince you that expensive 4K cables are a necessity, but the fact is they’re not. If your current cheap cables do fall short, the solution is simply another cheap cable from a different brand. HDMI is just a digital signal; it either carries the data or it doesn’t. Whatever you’ve read, a pricier cable will not enhance your picture because the signal has no way of carrying any alleged extra quality. Even if you dug out a dusty old cable from the back of a drawer, it would almost certainly deliver the same picture quality as a $50 cable you just pulled off the shelf at Best Buy.

It’s also worth noting that HDMI cable “versions” don’t actually exist. Whether it’s HDMI 2.0 or 2.1, these numbers describe your device’s ports. What actually counts when choosing the right HDMI cable is the speed category. If that dusty old cable is a standard cable, it won’t be able to handle 4K. But the good news is, even the cheapest cables on today’s market are almost always high-speed or premium high-speed, the latter of which can handle just about any 4K content.

Gold-plated connectors and signal fidelity are unnecessary, too. In fact, buying high-priced cables means you’re just buying a brand name, gimmicky features, and possibly a fancy box. The one exception is next-gen gaming. If you have the hardware capable of pushing 4K at 120fps, treat yourself to an ultra-high-speed cable — but even then, these are often reasonably priced; you don’t need to fork over a fortune.

Advertisement

Myth: you need an extended warranty

The moment you buy a new TV, just wait for the extended warranty hard sell. But did you know that extended warranties are often far more profitable for retailers than the hardware itself? In many cases, they pocket more than half of what you pay for the plan. With the global extended warranty market projected to reach an incredible $286.4 billion by 2032 according to Allied Market Research, this is not an industry built on goodwill — it’s a serious business. But the reality of a modern flat-screen TV is that they fail at a very low rate; we’re talking single-digit percentage numbers here. And when something does go wrong, the repair cost is usually just marginally higher than what you would have paid for the extended warranty. Consumer Reports put it bluntly when they said, “You shouldn’t have to pay extra to get manufacturers or retailers to stand behind their products.”

The pricing is not arbitrary, either. Companies work out how many TVs in a given model are likely to fail and set their prices accordingly, which ensures they always come out on top. The reality is, you’re not buying protection for your TV; you’re subsidizing their profits. Even if you do make a claim on your extended warranty, the experience is seldom straightforward. Repairs drag on, and a lot of the time they need more than one attempt to fix it. Most major credit cards quietly offer the cardholder a warranty extension as a free perk anyway, as long as you use that card to purchase the TV. The smart move is to keep your money or stash it in a repair fund. On a TV that is statistically very unlikely to need fixing, the odds are firmly in your favor.

Advertisement

Myth: TV contrast ratio specs are accurate

Contrast ratio measures how deep a TV’s blacks are against how bright its whites can get — and it is one of the most important factors in picture quality. However, if you’ve ever compared the contrast ratios of two TVs, you’ve probably been misled. That’s because the numbers are not directly comparable across brands. Manufacturers are not required to follow any single testing procedure when measuring it, so every brand does it differently — and most measure it in whatever way produces the biggest number.

At the heart of this is the difference between native and dynamic contrast ratio. Every TV has a native contrast ratio — what the screen can physically produce. Many also have dynamic contrast, a feature that adjusts brightness in dark and light scenes to deepen blacks and brighten whites. Because the dynamic figure is often much larger than the native figure, manufacturers sometimes highlight it on packaging — and it cannot be trusted as a reliable guide to what you will actually see. The number on the box is not a standardized measurement; it’s a marketing decision. With no standard benchmark, these numbers are essentially meaningless.

Advertisement

Myth: OLED burn-in is still a serious concern

Burn-in — the ghostly remnant of a static image permanently etched on an OLED screen. It has long haunted the OLED and spooked many buyers over the years. It’s probably the main reason many people have opted for LCD TVs instead. But should you be worried about burn-in on OLED TVs? Evidence suggests that fear is largely misplaced. Most people who think their screen has some burn-in symptoms are actually experiencing image retention. This is temporary and clears up on its own. True burn-in is permanent and was a legitimate concern with older OLEDs. But nowadays, it requires extreme conditions to happen. When it occurs, it occurs when the same static element, like a news channel logo, is left on the screen at high brightness for days on end.

RTINGS decided to put this one to bed when they conducted one of the most comprehensive TV longevity studies ever conducted. It was a 3-year accelerated test on over 100 TVs, accumulating more than 10,000 hours of usage. In the end, every single OLED did eventually show burn-in, but the tech experts made it clear that this was the result of deliberately extreme conditions, and they do not represent normal use. In an earlier test, RTINGS ran six OLED TVs for over 9,000 hours, showing a mix of general TV — the same way people actually watch TV. Not one of them developed significant burn-in. Myth debunked.

Advertisement

Methodology

We searched for the most widely discussed myths regarding TVs on the internet. The five we listed are easily the most talked about. We looked into it even deeper and found expert sources that have firmly debunked each of these myths. Our author also leaned on personal experience, having been a long-time nonbeliever in some of these; personal use showed that a small 1080p TV never posed a problem mounted on a bedroom wall for years, and affordable HDMI cables have never given any trouble. Additionally, the writer is too frugal to buy extended warranties, which have never resulted in any issue. However, all this debunking is also backed by reputable sources rather than relying on the author’s intuition alone.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How to watch Giro d’Italia 2026 free from anywhere with this VPN deal

Published

on


How to watch Giro d’Italia 2026 for free from anywhere with a VPN. Jonas Vingegaard, Giulio Pellizzari and Adam Yates are amongst the maglia rosa favourites.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Why a recent supply-chain attack singled out security firms Checkmarx and Bitwarden

Published

on

“Current evidence indicates that this data originated from Checkmarx’s GitHub repositories, and that access to those repositories was facilitated through the initial supply chain attack of March 23, 2023,” Checkmarx said Monday. The company didn’t say what kinds of data were leaked.

Checkmarx isn’t the only security company to suffer the aftereffects of the Trivy breach. Socket said that another security firm, Bitwarden, was also hit in the same supply-chain attack. Socket tied the Bitwarden breach to the Trivy campaign because the payload used the same C2 endpoint and core infrastructure as the Checkmarx malware.

The Trivy attack was carried out by a group calling itself TeamPCP. The group is among the most successful access-broker operations, a class of hackers that smashes and grabs credentials from victims and then sells them to other hackers. The key to its ascendency is its targeting of tools that already have privileged access.

In the case of Checkmarx, it appears TeamPCP sold access credentials to Lapsu$, a ransomware group made up mostly of teenagers known as much for its skill in breaching large companies as it is for its taunts and braggadocio once it succeeds.

Advertisement

The incidents demonstrate the cascading effects a single breach can have. With both Checkmarx and Bitwarden affected, it’s possible that there will be new attacks on their customers or partners and that even more downstream compromises could result from those. Socket CEO Feross Aboukhadijeh said in an email that security organizations are particular targets because of their products’ close proximity to sensitive data and their wide distribution across the Internet.

“You will see this same thread throughout these compromises,” Aboukhadijeh said. “Attackers are treating security tools as both a target and a delivery mechanism. They are attacking the products that are supposed to protect the supply chain, then using those same products to steal credentials and move to the next victim.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Best Smart Glasses in 2026: Wait for Google

Published

on

There’s one big question looming over anyone who considers smart glasses tech right now: Do you want to wear something with tech on your face? And, for how long? And is that something you’re even comfortable with, conceptually? The decision when it comes to display-enabled tethered glasses and wireless glasses is pretty different.

Display glasses vs. camera and audio glasses

Tethered glasses are really more like eye headphones that you’re perching on your face over your eyes. Although they have somewhat see-through lenses, they’re not made for all-day wear. You’ll put them on for movies, playing games or doing work, and then take them off. The commitment level might be a couple of hours a day at most.

Meanwhile, wireless smart glasses aim to be true everyday glasses. They’ll likely replace your existing glasses, become an additional pair or maybe act as smart sunglasses. But if you’re doing that, keep in mind you’ll need to outfit them with your prescription… or, get used to the limited battery life of wireless glasses. Meta Ray-Bans last several hours on a charge, depending on how they’re used. After that, they need to be recharged in their case, so you’ll need to wear another pair of glasses or just accept wearing a pair with a dead battery.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, there are other smart glasses that have longer battery life, like the Even Realities G2, but lack cameras and built-in speakers.

Meta Ray-Bans on a red table next to a phone showing a Live AI transcript

Live AI, Meta’s newest Ray-Bans feature, can keep a constant camera feed on the world. I tested it out.

Scott Stein/CNET

AI and its limits…and privacy

Advertisement

You’ll also want to consider what you’ll use the glasses for, and what devices or AI services you use. Wireless audio and video glasses like Ray-Bans need a phone app to pair and use with, but they can also act as basic Bluetooth headphones with any audio source. However, Meta Ray-Bans are limited to Meta AI as the functioning onboard AI service, with a few hook-ins to apps like Apple Music, Spotify, Calm and Facebook’s core platforms. You’re living in Meta’s world, and that’s a big problem when it comes to trusting the glasses to have a responsible data policy. You can choose to not use the AI features on Meta glasses, something I do because a lot of the AI functions aren’t that useful for me anyway.

Meta is opening up its smart glasses to app developers, although to what degree is still unknown. Meta’s newest Ray-Ban Display glasses, meanwhile, add more apps but mainly for Facebook app-connected functions. Meta’s also beginning to support connected fitness devices, but only with Garmin and its upcoming Oakley Vanguard sports visor for now.

Google’s next wave of glasses expected later this year should be more flexible, tapping into Gemini AI and more Google apps and services. But we still don’t know the entire limits of those glasses, either.

Apple is also expected to have its own AI-enabled glasses within the next year. In other words: things will be changing fast in this space.

Advertisement

AI-enabled glasses can often use AI and the onboard camera for a number of assistive purposes like live translation or describing an environment in detail. For those with vision loss or assistive needs, AI glasses are starting to become an exciting and helpful type of device, but they’re more limited than what you can do on phones and computers right now. Meta’s AI functions on glasses aren’t as flexible — you can’t necessarily add documents and personal information into it in the same way you can with other services. At least, not yet.

Tethered display glasses have limits, too

Display-enabled tethered glasses use USB-C to connect to gadgets that can output video via USB-C, like phones, laptops, tablets and even handheld game consoles. But they don’t all work the same. Phones can sometimes have app incompatibilities, preventing copyrighted videos from playing in rare instances (like Disney+ on iPhones). Steam Decks and Windows game handhelds work with tethered display glasses, but the Nintendo Switch and Switch 2 don’t, and need proprietary and bulky battery pack “mini docks” sold separately to send a signal through. Some glasses-makers like Xreal are building more custom chipsets in-glasses to pin displays in space or customize display size, while others lean on extra software only available on laptops or certain devices to perform extra tricks. But the space here is also changing. Project Aura, coming this year, will pair Xreal display glasses to an Android mini-computer to run lots of apps in 3D and with hand tracking, like a tiny mixed reality headset. More devices like this could emerge, adding true 3D augmented reality and more.

Advertisement
A man wearing Android XR glasses

Lexy Savvides

Lots on the horizon

If this all sounds like a bit of a Wild West landscape, that’s because it is. Glasses right now remind me of the wrist wearable scene before the Apple Watch and Android watches arrived: It was experimental, inconsistent, sometimes brilliant and sometimes frustrating. Expect glasses to evolve quickly over the next year or so, meaning your choice to buy in now is not guaranteed to be a perfect solution down the road.

While Meta is currently leading the way on face wearables, it’s likely that glasses coming soon will be even more evolved. Once Google and Apple enter the picture, expect more app and service compatibility on smart glasses, too.

And, keep an eye on your wrist. Meta’s neural band for its display glasses is a sign of where others will follow, and Google and Apple will likely fold watch interactions with its glasses for easier gestures and shortcut controls.

More companies are entering this space, including longtime glasses-maker (and social app company) Snap. Snap’s everyday AR glasses are coming later this year, too, but we don’t know that much about them yet, although I’ve tried their bulky developer prototypes several times.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station Review

Published

on

Verdict

The Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station is a very capable and modern docking station that provides a vast array of fast ports in a compact and stylish chassis that can act as a one-stop shop for power users. The Thunderbolt 5 USB-C ports are fast, alongside brisk USB and SD card slots, though it is quite expensive overall.

  • Compact and stylish aluminium finish

  • Lots of ports

  • Very easy to live with

  • Quite expensive

  • Maximum functionality relies super-modern devices

Key Features

  • Trusted Reviews IconTrusted Reviews Icon

    Advertisement

    Review Price:
    £419.99

  • Thunderbolt 5 connectivity

    Advertisement

    This Ugreen dock offers bang up-to-date connectivity with Thunderbolt 5 both in and out, allowing for fast power delivery and high resolution and refresh rate display out with compatible devices.

  • 17-in-1 ports

    Advertisement

    It comes with a wide range of ports for display, charging other devices and connecting external storage and more to one laptop in a neat package.

Introduction

The Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station looks to be one of the most feature-rich Thunderbolt 5 docks you can buy in 2026.

It’s a box that’s not much bigger than a new Mac Mini, packing everything from high-wattage USB-C with DisplayPort power, Ethernet, SD card, and more USB ports than you can shake a stick at, all in a small, premium package.

Advertisement

At £419.99/$499, it’s one of the more premium choices in the modern Thunderbolt 5 canon of docking stations, but may well have enough about it to be one of the strongest choices you can find – I’ve been putting it through its paces for the last couple of weeks to find out.

Advertisement

Design and Features

  • Compact and solid build
  • Vast array of modern ports
  • Handy accessories included

The Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station looks a little different from other laptop docking stations out there, opting for a small cubed shape when a lot of rivals are either hefty vertical towers or long horizontal desk hogs.

Size-wise, it isn’t too dissimilar from the latest Mac Mini, meaning it’s nice and compact. Build quality is strong, with a dark grey aluminium shell that fits the Apple aesthetic and gives this unit some heft; the sides also have copper-coloured accents with venting holes to provide a little bit of flair alongside a Ugreen logo on the top.

Side - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking StationSide - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The ventilation holes on the sides of the unit are for passive cooling, while a fan inside the dock provides active cooling for more demanding workflows.

Advertisement

Advertisement

The ports on the Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station are accessible, with the front panel housing a power button and indicator LED, along with separate MicroSD and SD card readers.

The SD card readers are potentially faster than a lot of the ones you’ll find in modern ultrabooks, being rated for up to 312Mbps, as they’re both UHS-II-rated, as long as you’re using a card that’ll take advantage of the higher-speed interface.

There is also a headphone jack and a trifecta of USB-C ports, two of which share up to 60W of power for fast charging a laptop, phone, or other devices.

Rear Ports - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking StationRear Ports - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

The main attraction is the rear I/O of this Ugreen unit, though, with an upstream Thunderbolt 5 port to your laptop handling the rest of the crowd of ports that provides up to 140W of power to the host device. To add to this, there are two further Thunderbolt 5 ports for hooking up external monitors, fast external SSDs and such, plus a full-size DisplayPort 2.1 for another monitor. 

For reference, Thunderbolt 5 doubles data speeds from 40Gbps to bi-directional 80Gbps, and up to 120Gbps in ‘boost mode’ for higher display bandwidth, which technically means it’s capable of up to 8K/60Hz or 4K/240Hz, depending on the laptop you’re using and the ports it comes with. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Underside - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking StationUnderside - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Moreover, for those connecting high-speed SSDs, Thunderbolt 5 also provides a hefty bandwidth increase with up to 64Gbps PCIe 4.0 available, and transfer speeds of up to 6200MB/s – that means you’ll be able to take advantage of any fast Gen 4 SSD you plug in at nearly full pelt.

You also get 2.5-Gig Ethernet for stable and brisk wired networking, alongside three 10Gbps USB-A ports for legacy devices and peripherals, and separate audio and mic jacks. On the underside is an M.2 slot for adding additional SSD storage, which supports up to 8TB drives, and has a hefty metal heatsink that means the slot is sunk quite far into the unit.

Front Ports - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking StationFront Ports - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

All of this is powered by a hefty 12V DC power brick, which is nearly as large as the Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station itself; nonetheless, as this dock can put out up to 240W of power to compatible devices, it’s certainly required.

Ugreen also bundles a range of region-specific power cables in the box, plus a proper Thunderbolt 5-capable USB-C cable and an M.2 screwdriver for undoing the enclosure on the base of the Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Performance

  • Fast charging to my MacBook Pro
  • Convenient means of connecting everything I needed to
  • Permissions need to be granted before it can work

During my time with the Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station, I hooked it up to my main 16-inch M1 Pro-powered MacBook Pro work laptop and used it in conjunction with a range of devices to best judge its usability.

I used the bundled Thunderbolt 5 USB-C port to connect my MacBook to the docking station, which not only makes it the brains of the operation, but with up to 140W of power delivery, also charges my laptop up briskly to boot.

Logo - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking StationLogo - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

When hooking up an external display, I was initially greeted with no signal, but it turns out that macOS needed permissions to connect to the dock before anything would work – that’s just a useful troubleshooting tip if you get no display out over either one of the rear USB-C ports or the DisplayPort 2.1 port on the unit.

My 16-inch M1 Pro-powered MacBook Pro unfortunately doesn’t support full-fat Thunderbolt 5 output, and instead has three Thunderbolt 4 USB-C ports, meaning its display out capabilities max out at 6K/60Hz, rather than the 8K/60Hz that Ugreen touts.

Advertisement

Side - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking StationSide - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Nonetheless, I had no trouble using it at 4K/144Hz with my Philips Evnia 32M2N8900 monitor hooked up to the docking station via the Thunderbolt 4-capable USB-C cable that came with the monitor initially. With a compatible Thunderbolt 5 monitor, though, you may be able to reap the full benefits of 4K/240Hz output over USB-C.

The vast array of ports also allowed this Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station to become the central hub of desktop connectivity, and it was soon easy to try and fill the ports up with an SD card from my camera, a wired mechanical keyboard, wired networking and a spare SSD on the underside to conveniently add storage to the 512GB internal capacity of my MacBook when I needed to.

Advertisement
Profile - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking StationProfile - Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

This dock is designed primarily for more intensive power users than me, and I still had ports I could have used when I thought I’d connected all my devices. It goes to prove the power of an apparent 17-in-1 docking station, and what you can really do with it.

Advertisement

Should you buy it?

You want lots of ports in a compact frame

This Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station impresses with its immense functionality and speed in a chassis that’s much more compact than rival choices.

Advertisement

You don’t need so many ports

Advertisement

If you don’t strictly require the 17-in-1 connectivity this laptop provides, then you can get away with a less featured choice that’ll also be a fair amount more affordable.

Final Thoughts

The Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station is a very capable and modern docking station that provides a vast array of fast ports in a compact and stylish chassis that can act as a one-stop shop for power users.

Advertisement

The Thunderbolt 5 USB-C ports are fast, alongside brisk USB and SD card slots, though it is quite expensive overall.

How We Test

We test every docking station we review thoroughly over an extended period of time. We use industry-standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

  • Tested for more than a week
  • Tested with real world use

FAQs

What ports does the Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station have?

The Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station has 17 total ports with one upstream Thunderbolt 5 port (80Gbps/120Gbps, 140W, two downstream Thunderbolt 5 ports (80Gbps, 15W), two USB-C ports (10Gbps, 60W, one USB-C port (10Gbps, 7.5W, three USB-A ports (10Gbps, 7.5W, one DisplayPort 2.1, Ethernet (2.5Gb), an SSD slot (M.2 NVme up to 8TB), a UHS-II SD card reader (312MBps), a UHS-II microSD card reader (312MBps), a 3.5mm combo audio jack (front), a 3.5mm In audio jack (back), a 3.5mm Out audio jack (back) and uses a 240W power supply.

Advertisement

Full Specs

  Ugreen Maxidok 17-in-1 Thunderbolt 5 Docking Station Review
UK RRP £419.99
USA RRP $499
Manufacturer Ugreen
Size (Dimensions) 133 x 133 x 53 MM
Weight 870 G
Release Date 2026
First Reviewed Date 13/04/2026
Resolution x
Ports One upstream Thunderbolt 5 port (80Gbps/120Gbps, 140W) Two downstream Thunderbolt 5 ports (80Gbps, 15W) Two USB-C ports (10Gbps, 60W) One USB-C port (10Gbps, 7.5W) Three USB-A ports (10Gbps, 7.5W) One DisplayPort 2.1 Ethernet (2.5Gb) SSD slot (M.2 NVme up to 8TB) UHS-II SD card reader (312MBps) UHS-II microSD card reader (312MBps) 3.5mm combo audio jack (front) 3.5mm In audio jack (back) 3.5mm Out audio jack (back) 240W power supply
Connectivity 2.5-gig Ethernet
Touch Screen No
Convertible? No

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Ask Hackaday: Do You Need a Tablet?

Published

on

There’s an old saying that the happiest days of a boat owner’s life are the day they buy the boat, and the day they sell it. For me, the happiest days of an Android tablet owner’s life are the day they buy a new one, and the day they buy a newer one. For some reason, I always buy tablets with great expectations, get them set up, and then promptly lose them in a pile on my desk, not to be seen again. Then a shiny new tablet gets my attention in a year or so, and the cycle repeats.

You might be thinking that I just buy cheap junk tablets. It is true that I have. But I have also bought new Galaxy and Asus tablets with the same result. Admittedly, I have owned several Surface Laptops and Pros, and I do use them. But I can’t remember the last time I have used one without the keyboard. They aren’t really tablets — they are just laptops that can also be heavy, awkward tablets.

Why?

I get the sense that iPad users get more use from their devices, but I’m not sure why. Maybe because Android tablets are really just blown-up phones. These days, my phone is big enough for most things. Sure, the tablet is bigger, but it isn’t that much bigger. In addition, my phone usually has a much better CPU, camera, and everything else. Not to mention it is constantly connected to the Internet, even if I’m not in range of a known WiFi router.

Read webpages? Phone. Play games? Phone. Deal with e-mail? Phone. The only advantage is if I put the tablet’s cheap Bluetooth keyboard on and use it like a laptop. But wait, I can just as well do that with the phone. Plus, voice typing for things like e-mails and messages is much better than it used to be.

Advertisement

Then there’s using it as a laptop replacement. When my laptop weighed a ton and got a few hours on a battery, that seemed like a good idea. But modern laptops don’t weigh that much, and they have pretty reasonable battery life, too. I always install some kind of Linux, like Termux and even Termux-X11, so I can use it as a lightweight Linux laptop. And I still don’t use it. (My setup is similar to the one in the video below, although you may have a few hiccups getting it all to work.)

Desktop

Phone, tablet, or laptop, I’m still more likely to be found at my desk behind a big screen with a serious computer. Maybe it’s a generation gap, like clinging to a landline phone (I don’t) or a DVD player (another thing I don’t do). Maybe it is that most of the things I do on the computer benefit from large split screens and fast computing times.

Of course, there’s also the gadget factor. My desktop computer is huge and heavy, full of cards and water coolers, disk drives and fans. Some people trick out their cars. It is hard to expand most laptops, phones, and tablets, although I have had some success taking them apart for simple upgrades. They never seem to go back together quite right, though.

So Then?

So then what do I actually want a tablet for? I don’t know. Which leads me to ask you: what are you using a tablet for? Do you really use it regularly? Or is it another gadget collecting dust? It doesn’t count if you repurpose them for some dedicated use: a second screen, a touchpad, or a 3D printer controller. I mean using them as a replacement for your normal computing platform. Let us know in the comments.

Advertisement

Maybe I’d be happier making my own tablet.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

FDA Grants Quick Review For 3 Psychedelic Drug Trials

Published

on

An anonymous reader quotes a report from NBC News: The Food and Drug Administration on Friday granted a quick review of three experimental psychedelic drugs meant to treat major depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. It’s the latest move by the Trump administration signaling a shift in policy toward treatments that also give users a high — coming a day after the Justice Department said it would ease restrictions on state-licensed medical marijuana.

UK-based biotech company Compass Pathways said Friday it has received an expedited review for its experimental form of synthetic psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression. In a press release the company cited two large, phase 3 studies that had “generated positive data.” Usona Institute, headquartered in Wisconsin, also said it’s received a voucher for its work with psilocybin to treat major depressive disorder. In an email, a Usona spokesperson said the company expects the review process to last one to two months after it submits its application. “The voucher expedites the timeline only; it does not alter scientific or regulatory standards,” the spokesperson wrote. New York-based Transcend Therapeutics has also been granted a priority review voucher for its experimental drug methylone for PTSD, Blake Mandell, the company’s chief executive officer, said. “There’s a battle still raging in their mind that we don’t fully understand biochemically,” FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said. “When you see something that looks promising for a community that is suffering with mental health illness, despair and suicidal ideation, you can’t help but recognize that.”

Makary told NBC News that with the priority voucher program, the agency could potentially approve the first psychedelic drug by the end of summer.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

There’s a big MacBook Air sale at B&H for our laptop of the year

Published

on

If you’ve been thinking about buying an Apple MacBook Air, B&H is having a fantastic sale right now with savings across several 13-inch M4 models. It runs through May 2, so you’ll need to move quickly.

Topping the list is the Apple 13″ MacBook Air (M4) in Sky Blue with 24GB RAM and a 1TB SSD is currently on sale for $1349 (was $1589) at B&H. That’s a massive saving on a configuration with plenty of memory for heavy workloads. This model handles large projects, creative software, and AI-powered features with ease while staying cool and quiet.

Advertisement


Apple 13″ MacBook Air in Starlight with 16GB RAM and a 1TB SSD, is currently $1,199 instead of $1,399, making it one of the most affordable choices in this lineup.

The 13.6″ Liquid Retina display delivers crisp detail and vibrant color, while the fast SSD gives you plenty of room for files, media, and project assets.

Advertisement

For those needing maximum storage, the Apple 13″ MacBook Air in Starlight with a 2TB SSD is down to $1,549 from $1,799, delivering a huge amount of space that will be ideal for storing large media libraries, video projects, and the like.

The Apple 13″ MacBook Air in Midnight with 24GB RAM and a 1TB SSD is now $1,299, reduced from $1,499, and it’s another great choice for users who want extra memory without blowing the budget.

Rounding things out, the Apple 13″ MacBook Air in Sky Blue with 16GB RAM and a 1TB SSD is down to $1,199 from $1,399, giving buyers another affordable entry point into Apple’s M4 line-up.

With these prices locked at their lowest levels in 180 days, this sale delivers some of the best MacBook Air (M4) deals I’ve seen.

Advertisement

If you’re still not fully sold, our Editor-at-Large Lance said in his glowing review, “The MacBook Air 13-inch (M4) has an excellent build and design, working on it is a pleasure, and the M4 provides all the power I need for the widest range of tasks. I appreciate the long battery life, bright, colorful screen, and clear audio. It has enough ports to support my almost always connected external screen, and I’m glad there’s still a vestigial 3.5mm headphone jack. macOS and the supporting Apple ecosystem are unparalleled.”

For more MacBook options, take a look at our rounds up of the best MacBook Pro and best video editing Mac and MacBook laptops.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

EU says Meta is breaking the law by failing to keep children off Facebook and Instagram

Published

on


The Commission says Meta’s own terms set 13 as the minimum age for Facebook and Instagram, but the systems in place to enforce that rule are not effective enough. Regulators say underage users can still get in by entering a false birth date, while existing accounts belonging to children are…
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025