Unlike the other glasses I tested, Even doesn’t sell a subscription plan; everything’s included out of the box.

The only downside I could find with the G2 is that it is largely devoid of offline features, so the glasses have to be connected to the internet to do much of anything. Considering the G2’s capabilities, it’s a trade-off I am more than happy to make.

Other Captioning Glasses I Tested

There are plenty of capable captioning eyeglasses on the market, but they are surprisingly similar in both looks and features. While many are quite capable, none had the combination of power and affordability that I got with Even’s G2. Here’s a rundown of everything else I tested.

Leion’s Hey 2 is the price leader in this market, and even its prescription lenses ($90 to $299) are pretty affordable. The hardware, however, is heavy: 50 grams without lenses, 60 grams with them. A full charge gets you six to eight hours of operation; the case adds juice for up to 12 recharges.

I like the Leion interface, which lays out caption, translation, “free talk” (two-way translation), and a teleprompter feature on its clean app. You get access to nine languages; using Pro minutes expands that to 143. Leion sells its premium plan by the minute, not the month, so you need to remember to toggle this mode off when you don’t need it. Pricing is $10 for 120 minutes, $50 for 1,200 minutes, and $200 for 6,000 minutes. There’s no offline use supported, and I often struggled to get AI summaries to show up in English instead of Chinese (regardless of the recorded language).

You’re not seeing double: XRAI and Leion use the same manufacturer for their hardware, and the glasses weigh the same. The battery spec is also similar, with up to eight hours on the frames and another 96 hours when recharging with the case. XRAI claims its display is significantly brighter than competitors’, but I didn’t see much of a difference in day-to-day use.

The features and user experience are roughly the same, though Leion’s teleprompter feature isn’t implemented in XRAI’s app, and it doesn’t offer AI summaries of conversations. I also didn’t find XRAI’s app as user-friendly as Leion’s version, particularly when trying to switch among the admittedly exhaustive 300 language options. Only 20 of these are included without ponying up for a Pro subscription, which is sold both by the month and minute: $20/month gets you a max of 600 upgraded transcription minutes and 300 translation minutes; $40/month gets you 1,800 and 1,200 minutes, respectively. On the plus side, XRAI does have a rudimentary offline mode that works better than most. For prescription lenses, add $140 to $170.

AirCaps does not make its own prescription lenses. Instead, you must purchase a pair of $39 “lens holders” and take them to an optician if you want prescription inserts. I was unable to test these with prescription lenses and ultimately had to try them out over my regular glasses, which worked well enough for short-term testing. Frames weigh a hefty 53 grams without add-on lenses; the company couldn’t tell me how much extra weight prescription lenses would add to that, but it’s safe to say these are the bulkiest and heaviest captioning glasses on the market. Despite the weight, they only carry two to four hours of battery life, with 10 or so recharges packed into the comically large case. Another option is to clip one of AirCaps’ rechargeable 13-gram Power Capsules ($79 for two) to one of the arms, which can provide 12 to 18 extra hours of juice.

The AirCaps feature list and interface make it perhaps the simplest of all these devices, with just a single button to start and stop recording. Transcriptions and translations are available for free in nine languages. For $20/month, you can add the Pro package, which offers better accuracy, access to more than 60 languages, and the option to generate AI summaries on demand (though only if recordings are long enough). As a bonus: Five hours of Pro features are free each month. Offline mode works pretty well, too. The only bad news is that these bulky frames just aren’t comfortable enough for long-term wear.

The most expensive option on the market (up to $1,399 with prescription lenses!) weighs a relatively svelte 40 grams (52 grams with lenses) and offers about four hours of battery life. There’s no charging case; the glasses must be charged directly using the included USB-connected dongle.

The glasses are extremely simple, offering transcription and translation features—with support for about 80 languages, which is impressive. I unfortunately found the prescription lenses Captify sent to be the blurriest of the bunch, making the captions comparatively hard to read. And while the device supports offline transcription, performance suffered badly when disconnected from the internet. I couldn’t get translations to work at all when offline. For $15/month, you get better accuracy and speaker differentiation, and access to AI summaries of conversations. Prescription lenses cost between $99 and $600.

The creative minds behind Mortal Kombat II know precisely how to make an awful ’90s-style action movie. We get a glimpse of that with footage from “Uncaged Fury,” an in-film demonstration of Hollywood playboy Johnny Cage’s replete with one-liners, glacially slow choreography and ridiculous stunts, all of which would have felt right at home in a forgettable Van Damme flick. By nodding to schlocky action cinema — which definitely includes Mortal Kombat (1995)— director Simon McQuoid and screenwriter Jeremy Slater are also making a statement: They know what not to do. That self-awareness ultimately makes it the best Mortal Kombat film yet.

This sequel is practically a point-by-point refutation of everything in “Uncaged Fury.” McQuoid, Slater and crew made the action far more complex than what we’ve seen before in the franchise. Moves hit harder, characters make more inventive use of their surroundings and everything is shot to emphasize the profound level of skill involved in constructing a modern fight scene. There are quips, to be sure (including a nod to Big Trouble in Little China, which directly influenced the Mortal Kombat games), but they’re more than just throw-away lines.

Perhaps most importantly, it balances those (slightly) loftier cinematic aspirations against the campier aspects of Mortal Kombat. It’s still about a tournament that determines the fate of the world. People have superpowers. There’s a necromancer. But there’s still room to find the humanity in these ridiculous characters.

Warner Bros

The best example of this is Johnny Cage himself, who is typically just presented as an annoying movie star in the games. In this film, he’s a washed up action star attending a geek convention where nobody recognizes him. As played by Karl Urban — a genre actor who’s appeared in Xena: The Warrior Princess, Lord of the Rings and currently stars in The Boys — Cage is the quintessential sad sack. He hates himself so much, he can’t even accept a modicum of praise from a former fan. Urban captures a man who is both past his prime, and whose prime was giving up a legitimate martial arts career to make schlock movies.

When he’s chosen to fight in Mortal Kombat, it’s impossible for Cage to see himself as an actual hero — after all, he’s only ever pretended to be one. Urban gets to show off his physical comedy chops as he’s thrown about in his first fight, showing us the campy side of the character. But he’s compelling enough as an actor to make us believe in Cage’s gradual heroic transformation.

Warner Bros.

While Johnny Cage steals the show, Mortal Kombat II starts off by introducing us to Kitana as a child princess who is forced to watch her father be brutally murdered by the tyrant Shao Kahn. That loss puts her realm, and all of its people, under Kahn’s rule. Inexplicably, he chooses to adopt her and take her mother on as a consort. Kitana’s focus becomes revenge, all the while putting on the face of a loyal warrior for Kahn. Given the weight of her storyline, there’s less room for Kitana to lean into camp like Johnny Cage, but at least she gets a sick combat fan made of knives.

Everyone else from the Mortal Kombat reboot returns, including Jessica McNamee as Sonya Blade, Ludi Lin as Liu Kang and Lewis Tan’s Cole Young, a new character invented for that film. They all get their time to shine with more elaborate fight scenes, which also appear more frequently, since the tournament serves as the spine of the film. In an interview for my film podcast, The Filmcast, McQuoid mentioned that his stunt team spent more time visualizing choreography and set pieces, which led to far more dynamic action sequences than the first film. It’s something I think even general audiences, who aren’t as particular about fight choreography, will notice.

Now I’m not going to pretend that Mortal Kombat II is a perfect film. It leans so much on the previous entry that it’ll be completely nonsensical to anyone jumping straight in. And people who are less enamored with the world of martial arts films may not appreciate that the characters spend more time punching and kicking than talking. But if you can appreciate the wordless ballet of a well-choreographed fight scene, where character depth is revealed through action itself, you’ll likely have a great time with Mortal Kombat II.

In an increasingly AI-driven and digital world, analog instant film and retro-style cameras remain popular, fueled by a combination of both nostalgia and charm. Instant cameras, in particular, stand out for their simplicity and an experience that has remained largely unchanged over time.

Fujifilm’s $175 Instax Wide 400 builds on the familiar instant photography experience and expands it with a wider format. As someone who appreciates simple, easy-to-use instant cameras and often shoots with an Instax Square, I was interested in trying a model that offers larger prints and support for landscape photography. 

The Instax Wide 400 is built for capturing group shots, scenic landscapes, and moments where fitting more of the scene into the frame really matters. It produces 62 × 99 mm prints, about twice the size of Instax Mini photos, giving you a lot more space to work with in every shot.

Since it’s a simple point-and-shoot camera, it requires no prior photography experience and is designed to be easy and intuitive to use. Its appeal lies in fun and simplicity rather than advanced controls.

With its one-button design, the camera offers no manual exposure controls. It automatically manages flash, focus, and other settings, leaving you to simply frame the image and take the shot.

When lighting is ideal, the images print with nice color and a good amount of detail with some extra saturation. I was quite impressed by the quality because it managed to pick up accurate colors and distant details. 

However, the simplicity of the camera does have some trade-offs because there isn’t much you can do to make photos brighter if you’re not in an ideal lighting situation. I did end up with some less-than-ideal shots because, in scenes with strong contrast, like dark trees against a bright sky, the details tended to blur together.

The rest of the camera is equally straightforward. To power on the camera, you rotate the lens counterclockwise. The first click activates close-up mode for subjects about 0.9 to three meters away. Turning it once more switches to landscape mode for distant subjects beyond three meters. Rotating the lens clockwise powers the camera off. 

The camera comes with a close-up lens attachment that snaps onto the front for close-up shots. I found the attachment was good at helping for avoiding focus and blur issues when taking close-ups. 

Loading the cartridge is simple, with guide lines to help you align it correctly in the camera. The door closes securely using a twist lock that latches shut. There is also a small indicator on the back that shows how much film is left.

Coming in at 162 mm x 98 mm x 123 mm and 1.4 pounds, the camera is quite bulky. It’s noticeably bigger than the Instax Mini cameras and the Instax Square models. However, I wasn’t too surprised by the size, since it makes sense that larger photos would require a bigger camera. 

That said, it’s not something you’d want to carry around without a bag, and while the shoulder strap helps, I was still very conscious of it and careful not to bump it into people or objects in busy spaces. Although Instax does offer a camera case sold separately, I didn’t receive one alongside my review unit, so I can’t speak to it. 

Since it’s a bit bulky, it’s pretty noticeable, and it ended up attracting the attention of a few people when I was testing it. A worker at a downtown gelato shop even stopped to compliment it, calling it a “cool looking camera.”

That kind of attention is part of the appeal. 

The camera’s self-timer is a nice feature, as it makes it possible to include everyone in a shot without needing someone to press the shutter button. It works by pushing a lever on the side and choosing one of four durations, ranging from two to 10 seconds. The camera emits a ticking sound to indicate that the timer is active, and red lights provide a visual countdown.

If you don’t have a tripod, the camera’s strap includes two angle adjustment accessories that can help prop and position the camera on a flat surface. To use one, slide it into the indented space on the camera’s underside, set the self-timer, and step back into the frame.

Film for the camera is available in standard white frame, black frame, metallic borders, and monochrome. Fujifilm sent me the standard white film alongside my review unit, which is the film I used for this review. Each box of film comes with 20 sheets and costs between $25-$28.

As for colors, the Instax Wide 400 comes in two options: green and jet black. As someone who loves a good shade of green, I liked that the color of the camera gave it a more playful, fun vibe.

Overall, I think this camera is a great option for people of all ages, as it offers high-quality images while remaining simple enough for kids and teens who are just starting out in photography.

The 2026 World Cup starts on June 11, and while a lot of people will be thinking about a new TV, there’s still one crucial component that can make or break the whole experience: audio.

A new soundbar can really add another dimension to the World Cup viewing experience, delivering clearer commentary and a more immersive atmosphere by capturing the roar of the crowds. Let’s face it, even the best TVs have average built-in audio, and it’d be a shame to miss out on the full World Cup feeling.

‘Significant’ patient population unresponsive to existing schizophrenia treatments, highlighting ‘major unmet clinical need’, according to PhD researcher Keelin Harrison.

Keelin Harrison is a PhD student researching the role of neuroinflammation in the pathology of schizophrenia.

“What is becoming increasingly clear”, Harrison says, “is that neuroinflammation is a highly dynamic process, and understanding how it interacts with structural and circuit-level changes in the brain remains an evolving area of research.

“Building on this foundation, my PhD project aims to further investigate these mechanisms and explore their potential role as therapeutic targets.” She is a researcher at the FutureNeuro Research Ireland Centre for Translational Brain Science, based at RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences.

Harrison’s research career began in biological and biomedical sciences first, before she specialised in neuroscience midway through her undergraduate degree from Trinity College Dublin. Later, she completed her masters’ degree in translational neuroscience at Imperial College London, where she developed a strong interest to research the role neuroinflammation plays across neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Harrison says she engages with patient and public involvement initiatives through FutureNeuro to better ensure that her research is informed by the perspectives of those it ultimately aims to benefit.

What kind of impact do you foresee from your research?

Schizophrenia affects approximately 1pc of the population and is a profoundly debilitating condition, impacting cognition, perception, emotion and social functioning.

While current antipsychotic medications can be effective in treating positive symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions, they do not adequately address cognitive deficits or broader functional impairments. In addition, a significant proportion of patients do not respond to existing treatments, highlighting a major unmet clinical need.

My research aims to advance understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying schizophrenia – particularly the role of inflammation – and to identify potential targets for future therapeutic development. Ultimately, the goal is to support the development of more effective treatment strategies for patients.

What inspired you to become a researcher?

Growing up, I was always naturally curious and inclined to ask questions about how things work. When I was first introduced to neuroscience, I was struck by how many fundamental questions remain unanswered – and in some cases, whether we are even asking the right ones.

Being in an environment that encourages curiosity, critical thinking and intellectual challenge is what initially drew me to research and continues to motivate me. I find it genuinely rewarding to step back, question assumptions and contribute to a field that is still rapidly evolving.

What are some of the biggest challenges or misconceptions you face as a researcher in your field?

One of the central challenges in neuroscience and psychiatric research is the difficulty of modelling human psychiatric conditions in preclinical systems. There is often a disconnect between biological findings in animal models and their relevance to human disease, which can limit translation.

Another challenge is the persistence of stigma and misunderstanding surrounding psychiatric disorders, which can influence how research in this area is perceived and supported.

More broadly, there remains a misconception that conditions like schizophrenia are well understood or primarily defined by their symptoms alone, when in reality, they involve complex and heterogeneous biological and environmental factors.

Do you think public engagement with science and data has changed in recent years?

Public engagement with science has become increasingly important, particularly in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, which highlighted both the value of clear scientific communication and the risks posed by misinformation. Effect communication between researchers and the general public is essential for building trust, preventing misunderstandings and ensuring that findings are accessible and accurately represented.

Furthermore, involving public and patients in the research process helps ensure that scientific questions are aligned with real-world needs and priorities.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

We got asked a great question in the mailbag segment on the Podcast this week: are there hacks that we have read about on Hackaday that we use in our everyday life? The answer was absolutely yes, and I loved Tom’s take it often goes the other way – he sees a hack, tests it out, and then writes it up.

But I started looking around the office and I found more examples of projects that were absolutely inspired by projects I had seen on Hackaday, yet weren’t the same. I made a DIY mechanical keyboard because I saw someone else do it. There are a few home-made battery packs that I probably wouldn’t have attempted without having read about someone doing the same thing. I riffed on [Ted Yapo]’s Tritiled project, making a slightly inferior, but workable knockoff, and they’ve been glowing for many years now.

That got me to thinking about reproducing a project versus taking inspiration from it, and though I enjoy both, I’m find myself most often in the “inspiration” mode. I just can’t leave well enough alone, even when I’m fundamentally copying someone. NIH syndrome? Expediency? Probably both, and sometimes with a dose of hubris or feature creep.

Looking back at [Ted]’s TritiLED, though, I found some great examples in both the rebuild and redesign modes on Hackaday.io. [schlion]’s Making Ted Yapo’s TritiLED couldn’t be a clearer example of the former, and it’s great to look over his shoulder and appreciate all the lessons he learned along the way. [Stephan Walter]’s Yet another ultra low power LED is inspired by [Christoph Tack]’s Ultra low power LED, which is in turn inspired by [Ted]’s project, like a conceptual grandchild.

In a way, I look at this like with music: sometimes you play the notes the way they were written down, and sometimes you riff on someone else’s theme. Both are equally valid, and both owe a debt to the upstream source. Is Hackaday the hackers’ jazz club? And which of these modes do you find yourself working in most?

Apple has updated its education pricing in several countries, now including the US, to offer educators and students discounts on Apple Watch for the first time.

Starting on May 7, Apple Store will now offer discounted pricing on Apple Watch SE 3, Apple Watch Series 11, and Apple Watch Ultra 3 to qualifying users. They include faculty and staff of higher education institutions as well as students who are enrolled or accepted into said institutions.

The new Apple Watch pricing is not available globally, however. Apple has been updating the list of countries where the new pricing is applicable, though, and as of May 8 at 6 AM ET, It’s available in:

• Australia
• Canada
• Chile
• China (via AliPay)
• France
• Germany
• Hong Kong
• India
• Italy
• Japan
• Malaysia
• Saudi Arabia
• Singapore
• South Korea
• Spain
• Taiwan
• Thailand
• Turkey
• UK
• US
• Vietnam

Education customers will verify their eligibility in store and online via Unidays. Most will receive approval instantly, though it can take up to 24 hours.

This joins Apple existing education pricing that largely applies to Mac and iPad purchases. Currently, education customers in the U.S. are still limited to discounts on new Mac and iPad devices.

Discounts vary, but education pricing can save users up to 10% on their qualifying purchases.

At press time, U.S. customers can save across the wearable range in our Apple Watch Price Guide, even without EDU status. Deals found in the price guide include a $100 discount on the Series 11, bringing the price down to $299, while the SE 3 can be found for as low as $219.

Update May 8, 6:00 AM ET: Apple has now brought its Apple Watch education discounts to North America.