The Pentagon is forcing private spy satellite firms to hide the true extent of damage caused in the US-Israeli attack on Iran. The US is ensuring compliance by threatening to cut the funds these firms rely on, leaving the US and global public in the dark.

US reporter Ken Klippenstein said military sources told him:

that the level of secrecy surrounding the specifics of the Iran war is unprecedented, with barely any data being released about the level of bombing, the targets being attacked, or the assessed effects.

Adding:

Now the Trump administration is trying to further control what private companies say in a behind-the-scenes effort [that has] not been previously reported.

The US-Israel attacked Iran first on 28 February without provocation. At the time, Iran was offering unprecedented concessions in negotiations at the time. The Pentagon has since stated there was no imminent threat from Iran. The UN’s atomic watchdog, the IAEA, has also said there is no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear weapon.

Pentagon arm-twisting

Klippenstein wrote that as soon as the war was underway on 28 March:

the military promptly issued guidance to satellite operators of what “language and terms to avoid” when describing damage caused by Iran to American bases in the Middle East, according to a copy of the guidance leaked to me.

🚨 US military document leaked to me shows how the Pentagon is working with private companies to manipulate the information you see about the Iran warhttps://t.co/w9G5bz8QZy

— Ken Klippenstein (@kenklippenstein) March 24, 2026

For example, the guidance insists firms:

“Avoid language that implies battle damage assessment (BDA) or operational conclusions,” one slide produced by U.S. Space Force says. It goes on to warn against using phrases like “Target destroyed,” “Target eliminated,” and “Structure rendered inoperable.”

And the Pentagon is using its role as a big money contract provider to ensure silence:

While the Pentagon “guidance” to the commercial companies is framed as an advisory, the companies comply because their contracting relationships with the government make them afraid to bite the hand that feeds them.

According to Klippenstein over 100 spy satellite firms rely on military contracts. The industry is worth between $6bn and $77bn a year. And it is not just firms who do classified work who are affected:

even those that work on the collection and dissemination of public or “open source” materials that inform the news media, academia, think tanks, and other groups.

A source told Klippenstein:

While there’s a case to be made that they [the companies] should fight it, almost everyone makes the vast majority of their revenue from government contracts in this industry and after Anthropic, nobody is interested in putting up a fight.

Adding:

I think it’s also another layer of trying to make things [about the war] seem less bad than they are.

The reference to Anthropic relates to an ongoing row between the US military and the tech firm Anthropic:

Anthropic has refused to allow its AI model, Claude, to be used for certain missions involving mass domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons. The Pentagon in response has threatened to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the company’s cooperation.

As the Canary has reported Claude was used in the 3 January US attack on Venezuela.

Trump’s war on the truth

The US has fought to limit public knowledge about the war since it began bombing Iran. And it has reacted belligerently to factual reportage. For example, the White House launched into a bizarre public rant about Drop Site News on 18 March after the outlet reported on US attempts to restart negotiations with Iran.

A spokesperson said:

The radical, left-wing Drop Site News is clearly carrying water for the Iranian terrorist regime – and reports like these based on pure fiction and citing unnamed anonymous sources should be discarded immediately.

Adding:

Iran feeds this fake news media outlet propaganda and they publish it as fact, which is abhorrent, America Last behavior. Operation Epic Fury will continue unabated until President Trump, as Commander-in-Chief, determines that the goals of Operation Epic Fury, including for Iran to no longer pose a military threat, have been fully realized.

Trump’s war against press freedom and open public information rears its head again. As the US war on Iran stalls and Iran itself continues to resist a return to peace talks, we can expect to see more and more efforts to limit access to facts, stymy reporting and cajole the press, public, and private and public institutions into cooperation.

Featured image via the Canary

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is re-organising its shipments to the Sudanese Rapid Support Force (RSF) militia. RSF has been waging a genocidal civil war in Sudan since 2023 with the UAE as its main military backer. The Canary reported on 12 March how the Iranian response to the US-Israeli attack had forced UAE to reorganise how it supplied its proxies in Sudan.

Le Monde reported on 23 March that the UAE is using new covert routes to get weapons into the east African state. The French outlet identified:

a network of cargo flights departing the UAE for East and Central Africa, including Ethiopia and the Central African Republic, believed to be part of an arms supply chain to the RSF.

Le Monde reported that two cargo planes linked to the UAE royal family—including an aircraft now owned by a UAE citizen in Africa—has made a series of flights from the Gulf petrostate to Ethiopia. Ethiopia is believed to be home to an RSF supply base.

The paper said one aircraft had been:

previously owned by Gewan Airways, a company linked to a conglomerate controlled by the brother of UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed, and has previously been flagged for its role in supplying the RSF.

The other cargo plane:

is now operated by Invicta Air Cargo, a company established in 2025 in the Central African Republic by a UAE national. Despite attempts to obscure links, the company’s website reportedly connects back to Gewan Airways.

New Arab explained:

The flights suggest the UAE is expanding logistical routes through neighbouring countries, including Ethiopia, where it is reported to have established a training camp for RSF fighters in 2025.

Colonial shadow war

UAE has been a major backer of RSF in its war with the Sudanese government. Turkey, Egypt, Israel and many more countries are pursuing their own interests in Sudan too. British military components has also shown up on the battlefield in RSF hands. The UK is a major arms supplier to UAE.

As the Canary has said in our previous coverage of this poorly-understood genocidal war:

The war in Sudan is theoretically between the Arab supremacist RSF and the Sudanese government. But foreign states pursuing their own interests are backing the combatants. The United Arab Emirates (UAE), for example, backs the RSF with arms and equipment. Egypt backs the government, alongside Russia, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. Israel has backed both sides at different times.

The mounting death toll is similarly mindboggling:

RSF has killed Sudanese civilians in vast numbers. And some estimates say 150,000 people have died and over 10mn have been displaced by fighting.

UAE appears determined to keep arming its proxy force in Sudan despite the impacts of Iran’s strikes on Gulf states which harbour American infrastructure. Meanwhile, the people of Sudan find themselves living—and dying—at a nexus of competing local and colonial interests.

Featured image via the Canary

Local elections are coming in fast, with just over six weeks until over 4,850 councillors will be up for election. Labour is justifiably fearing how they will fare as their lurch to the right has disgusted and alienated more left-wing voters. Meanwhile, Your Party still appears to be dithering.

The West is witnessing the rise of the far-right. Billionaires are eagerly funnelling funds into hateful parties like Reform, Advance, and Restore in the UK—all cut from the same cloth as the Canary has long been reporting. As a result, it is more critical than ever that communities have a socialist candidate to cut through the noise of the racist misinformation spread by right-wing politicians.

Despite announcing its formation nearly a year ago, Your Party is dragging its feet, risking leaving communities without a candidate to support. With far-right parties rising rapidly, fielding candidates is clearly achievable in this time frame—but the new party continues to dither.

This begs the question: is this really the best Corbyn and his team can do?

A likely sign of impending disappointment for its members, is Your Party’s failure to back Scottish candidates in the Holyrood elections:

This is so outrageous. I dont even know what to say. Its almost like YP wants to destroy the party. Solidarity @NiallChristie1 this cannot be the way YP is run @jeremycorbyn https://t.co/zdsEWYNqyE

— Anwarul Khan (@TPleicester) March 23, 2026

Missed opportunity

The Canary has contacted Your Party and Central Executive Committee (CEC) member Louise Regan to ask whether the party will field official YP candidates in the upcoming local elections. On May 7, there will be 4,850 councillor seats up for election, set against the backdrop of an increasingly divisive political atmosphere.

Far-right parties like Reform and Restore UK have been hard at work inflaming divisions in our communities, actively targeting minoritised communities. Socialist groups across the country stand ready to challenge the far-right on the doorsteps. However with a seemingly silent and inactive YP they are left isolated as independent candidates with no party machine behind them.

Despite numerous groups and candidates appealing to YP for endorsement, they have received no response.

Mike Forster of PACE in Huddersfield believed he had Jeremy Corbyn’s support as a candidate. However, after requesting an endorsement over a week ago, he has received no response from YP. Nevertheless, they have registered with the Electoral Commission at their own expense, and will be able to stand candidates under the banner of PACE.

This failure on behalf of the CEC and the leadership of YP has had a devastating impact on morale among members.

We wrote yesterday about the formation of socialist pressure groups in response to this silence:

Despite the desperate need for unity, solidarity and compassion in British society, the reported behaviour of the CEC has been to silence or intimidate socialist voices into compliance.

Members are feeling increasingly concerned that Your Party will not work to empower them or listen to their communities. Instead, branches are left ignored without access to resources or guidance which has seen local members abandon the party all together in disappointment.

Change of tack from Your Party following uproar

Your Party faces harsh criticism from members, who are pressuring the executive committee to stay true to being an inclusive, socialist party@MaddisonW92 https://t.co/2ZRkeOkA5g

— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) March 23, 2026

The Canary has now seen an email issued to Your Party members in Scotland. This email follows the widespread anger after Niall Christie’s recent post confirming Scotland would not see candidates in the Holyrood elections. Christie blamed ‘inaction and decisions taken at a UK level’ for this abandonment of Scottish members.

NEW: Your Party will not be standing candidates in the upcoming Holyrood elections, the party’s leading Scottish representative has said ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/RYuyYk2Zv0

— The National (@ScotNational) March 23, 2026

Advertisement

Signalling a potential change of tack, YP are now offering members a choice in the matter:

A ‘Jeremy Corbyn fan club’

Nonetheless, time is flying, and if YP keeps dragging its feet, candidates will have even less time to campaign.

After all, wasn’t this meant to be an active, participatory democracy party?

So far, all the real action is happening at the grassroots, where socialist groups are organising themselves in the absence of Your Party. The executive, meanwhile, seem either unwilling or unmotivated to step up.

Your Party is literally just the Jeremy Corbyn fan club. It’s clear that he’s just not a very competent leader, whether or not you think he was treated fairly by the British media during his term as Labour leader https://t.co/EPBRYGjMkF

— Mac 🌹🔰 (@GeorgismFan) March 23, 2026

Toxic from day one

Your Party has been toxic from the very start—that’s undeniable. Yet the leadership blame whistleblowers and critics for these divisions, revealing the same predictable lack of humility and accountability.

Widespread reports show that Karie Murphy, Corbyn, and his allies strongly opposed Zarah Sultana’s involvement and the idea of co-leadership. As often happens when certain individuals dominate or bully, new groups formed, aligning more with shared principles and values than with the original central leadership.

Nonetheless, YP has seriously undermined how the experience of people across the country who have long been shut down or shut out. This no longer diminishes us into silence but fuels our drive to move forward.

Grassroots groups across the country are bursting with energy, collaboration, and solidarity—it’s truly inspiring. The collective efforts show us that socialism isn’t just an idea—it’s a much needed path towards national healing.

Featured image via the Canary

Sellafield Ltd, through its SiX (social impact, multiplied) programme, has announced a major investment in LEVELS, a ground-breaking £4.6 million redevelopment of the former Whittles department store in Whitehaven, West Cumbria into a state-of-the-art immersive entertainment and education centre.

Delivered and developed by social impact property developers BEC, LEVELS has transformed a Grade II-listed building into a cutting-edge hub for digital creativity, learning, and interactive experiences.

Across 4 floors, the centre features immersive digital and gaming experiences, an esports arena, interactive learning spaces, and a café—creating a vibrant space for education and creativity in the heart of Whitehaven.

By equipping young people with the skills needed for a digital-first future, the project aims to engage young people, their families, and educators, inspiring the next generation to explore careers in digital and creative technology.

Funding for the project includes £3.3 million from Sellafield Ltd through its SiX programme, alongside £800,000 in funding, equipment, and logistical support from BT, Atos, and Openreach—as part of their social impact commitments through Information and Communications Technology contracts with Sellafield Ltd.

BEC has also contributed £500,000, demonstrating the power of partnership to multiply impact.

Tracey West, Sellafield Ltd’s head of social impact, said:

“LEVELS represents exactly what our SiX programme is about—creating lasting social impact by investing in skills, innovation, and opportunity. By collaborating with partners like BEC and our supply chain, we’re helping West Cumbria’s young people prepare for a digital future.

This investment builds on our long-standing commitment to improving education provision in West Cumbria, following projects such as West Lakes Academy, the Whitehaven Campus, the National College for Nuclear, and the Well programme.”

In an incident that has rocked Czech football, police arrested dozens of people in connection with fraud, betting and match-fixing on the morning of 24 March. These raids have been described as one of the biggest security operation targeted sports gambling in the country.

The iSport.cz website was the first to report the news, revealing that both sports players and referees were among those arrested. They also highlighted the involvement of top-division football clubs. This underscores the depth and breadth of corruption in the domestic football industry.

At a press conference held on the same day, Czech Football Association (CFA) President David Tronda delivered the following message:

The integrity of competitions is absolutely essential for us and represents one of the fundamental pillars of professional football. Any behavior that contradicts these principles is completely unacceptable for us. We will do our utmost to ensure that those found guilty are severely and exemplary punished.

Multi-agency cooperation

The latest raid was no spur-of-the-moment effort, but the result of a three-year investigation. It was a collaborative initiative involving international agencies, Europol, Interpol, and local authorities with experience in tackling organised criminal networks.

Trondo conceded in an internal memo that the raid may be the largest in the history of Czech football. He also confirmed the key role the Czech Football Association (CFA) played in the investigation, revealing that they had been working in close coordination with the police to expose years of corrupt betting and match-fixing practices.

According to the Czech News Agency (CTK), the National Center for Combating Organised Crime is overseeing criminal proceedings in the case. This is happening amidst a media blackout. Furthermore, spokesperson Jaroslav Ibehič clarified that the release of information is being handled exclusively by the Olomouc Prosecutor’s Office.

The rot runs deeper than suspected

There are 47 people now facing disciplinary investigation so far, Trunda said, on suspicion of betting fraud and match rigging.

This shows just how deep the corruption runs in a case that not only implicates first-division teams but also youth clubs—covering the full gamut.

Despite the seriousness of these developments, the federation emphasised that none of its officials have been found to be involved. They also confirmed that UEFA has been kept informed of the case’s progress.

Reputational blowback

The case, which is still unfolding, represents a significant blow to the reputation of Czech football. It marks the beginning of a critical and more difficult phase of rooting out the betting mafia. However, the lost trust in the sport could take years to rebuild.

As the investigation continues, questions loom over the scale of the network involved and the full extent of the sporting figures tied to it. With uncertainty surrounding the names that may be implicated.

This is shaping up to be one of the most explosive match-fixing scandals Europe has seen in recent years.

Featured image via the Canary

With depressing predictability, politicians are using the antisemitic Golders Green arson as an excuse to roll out Islamophobic rhetoric. Never mind the fact that we have no idea who carried out the attack – the knee-jerk bigotry is already in full swing.

Golders Green: Al Jazeera told to ‘go home’

Politicians and the general public alike have pivoted to Islamophobic and anti-Arab rhetoric almost immediately after the attack.

As a case in point, an Al Jazeera news crew had to leave the scene of the Golders Green attack after a crowd started chanting “go home” at them. Reuters footage shows one individual telling an Al Jazeera staffer:

Go take your briefcase, go take your Al Jazeera equipment and go. No one wants Al Jazeera here.

Alarming footage of the incident showed reporters being harassed out of the area:

Al Jazeera reporter and crew were harassed for covering the incident in Golders Green. pic.twitter.com/K7uZXjzSh4

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) March 23, 2026

The crowd later chanted “Al Jazeera off our streets”, “go home”, and “terrorists”.

After a police officer stated that “They’re reporting the news”, an onlooker said:

We feel threatened by Al Jazeera being here. We feel threatened. We don’t feel safe.

The reporting is going to go to potential terrorists. That’s why we don’t want to see that on our streets. For our safety, please remove them from our streets.

Of course, Al Jazeera also provides in-depth coverage of the frontline conflict in Gaza. At one point, the IDF closed Al Jazeera’s offices in Israel, alleging they were being used “to support terrorist activities.” Al Jazeera flatly denied the accusations, calling them:

an affront to press freedom and the very principles of journalism.

A number of journalists from Al Jazeera have been murdered during Israel’s concerted campaign to eliminate journalists reporting on their genocide.

What’s ‘intifada’ got to do with it?

And, in the House of Commons, right-wing politicians took the opportunity to conflate the attack with Islam and support for Palestine.

Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, asked his counterpart Shabana Mahmood whether she believes that:

calls on our streets at marches for Jihad and Intifada are calls for violence, which fuel antisemitism, and does she agree they should no longer be allowed?

Note Philip’s attempt to conflate ‘jihad’ with ‘intifada’, the Arabic word for ‘uprising’. After the Bondi Beach attacks in Australia, Zionists around the world called for bans on the use of ‘intifada’, to varying success. At the time, the Canary wrote:

To decry the terrorist assault on Bondi beach as a manifestation of a globalised intifada is nothing short of a heinous smear.

It is a smear against anti-Zionist protesters across the world who use the phrase ‘globalise the intifada’ as a call to action against Israel’s genocide. That action is non-violent, and often carried out by anti-Zionist Jewish protestors. And yet still, it is conflated with terrorism at every turn.

Advertisement

Predictably, and despite the complete lack of any evidence, Philp also got in a call for more deportations:

And finally, will she ensure that all antisemites and extremists who are not British citizens get deported?

Because why stop at Islamophobia when you could also chuck in some anti-migrant sentiment?

‘Terror cell embedded in North London’

Following suit, far-right leader Nigel Farage took to social media to whip up fear:

What I want to hear, what the whole country wants to hear, given we now have a terror cell embedded in North London, what I want to hear is that you are proscribing as a terrorist organisation the IRGC.

The IRGC refers to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, part of the Iranian military. Again, note that Farage is doing precisely what counter-terror police have warned against, pinning the attack on Iran.

Likewise, he’s calling for the proscription of the military of a country currently being attacked illegally by his mate Trump. And, notably, the IRCG is not the group that claimed responsibility for the attack in Golders Green.

It’s also worth bearing in mind that Farage only cares about antisemitism when it can be used to attack Islam and the Arab world. He has repeatedly denied claiming that “Hitler was right”, in spite of multiple witnesses coming forwards. Likewise, he later made thousands selling videos to neo-Nazis. 

Now, none of this is to say that HAYI wasn’t responsible for the Golders Green attacks. This claim hasn’t been confirmed; it isn’t something we know one way or the other. Likewise, authorities have also stated that they aren’t yet convinced of the Iranian state’s responsibility or involvement.

However, it’s a depressingly common occurrence that any antisemitic attack in the UK is immediately weaponised by cynical, bigoted politicians. In one breath, they condemn antisemitism and then immediately employ dog-whistle Islamophobic, anti-Arab and anti-migrant rhetoric.

We see them, we know what they’re doing, and we won’t stand for their weaponisation of hatred.

Featured image via the Canary

On 10 March, the Labour government’s bill to restrict access to jury trials, a right enjoyed by English citizens for over 800 years, successfully passed its first reading in the houses of parliament.

As previously reported, the Minister for Courts, Sarah Sackman, announced plans for many criminal cases to be heard by only a judge and a magistrate, in order to reduce a backlog of ten of thousands of cases.

This is despite that fact that, in 2017, now justice secretary David Lammy concluded that juries “act as a filter for prejudice”, following an independent review commissioned by then prime minister David Cameron. In 2020, he said:

Jury trials are a fundamental part of our democratic settlement. Criminal trials without juries are a bad idea… The government needs to pull their finger out and acquire empty buildings across the country to make sure these [trials] can happen in a way that is safe … you don’t fix the backlog with trials that are widely perceived as unfair.

Now, Lammy wants to get rid of them.

My investigations reveal that this erosion of democracy has been shaped by Lammy and Sackman, two pro-Israeli lawyers-turned-politicians, who have both been captured by lobbyists and arms traders.

Jury trials and Sarah Sackman

Keir Starmer initially appointed Sarah Sackman as solicitor-general. Now, she is Labour’s minister of state for courts and legal services. But Sackman previously worked as a judicial clerk in the Israeli Supreme Court. She has also stated that she “travels to Israel on a yearly basis”.

From 2015-2024, Sackman was the vice-chair of the pro-Israeli Jewish Labour Movement. Indeed, the Jewish Labour Movement, which was known as “Poale Zion” until 2004, openly declares that one of its aims is “to promote the centrality of Israel in Jewish life”. In 2015, Sackman said:

The issue of Israel is something that is deeply personal and emotional.

In May 2024, Sackman opposed International Criminal Court arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and defence minister Yoav Gallant, saying:

I trust the Israeli people to hold their leaders to account.

Just three months later, a poll revealed that 65% of Jewish Israelis opposed criminal prosecution for IDF soldiers suspected of gang rape. Israeli society responded to the Sde Teiman abuse scandal by holding “right to rape” protests, and the Israeli state responded by arresting the chief military advocate who had leaked the video of the abuse.

On 12 March, all remaining charges of “aggravated abuse” and “causing aggravated injury” against the five soldiers (charges of rape were never brought) were dropped. This is the society that Sackman trusts to “hold their leaders to account”.

Sackman has received tens of thousands of pounds from lobbyists Jonathan Mendelsohn, Stephen Grabiner, Michael Sternberg, Jonathan Kestenbaum and Trevor Chinn. She was also funded by Labour Together, the corrupt outfit of Morgan McSweeney fame. Labour MP Luke Akehurst called McSweeney a “pivotal figure” and “solid supporter of Israel”.

Lammy is in Zionist pockets

Like Starmer, Lammy is a parliamentary supporter of Labour Friends of Israel and has a long history of promoting the pro-Israeli lobby in Britain.

In February 2025, Lammy had an “off-the-record” meeting with former Labour Together director and life-long Israel lobbyist Trevor Chinn. In 2012, they travelled together on a Labour Friends of Israel-funded trip. The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs also chipped in with £90 towards expenses.

In 2014, Chinn donated £30,000 to Lammy’s failed London mayoral campaign. The campaign was led by David Mencer, a former Labour Friends of Israel director who later became a spokesperson for the Israeli government, a veritable rent-a-mouth defending the most heinous of crimes.

Lammy’s mayoral campaign was also bankrolled by Jonathan Goldstein, a Chelsea FC co-owner who personally hosted Starmer in a Stamford Bridge box.

Financial backers

Goldstein travelled to occupied Palestine and met with Israeli state ministers, including Gilad Erdan. After becoming head of the Jewish Leadership Council that same year, Goldstein stated his intent to “make the community louder and prouder on Israel”. He describes convicted criminal Gerald Ronson as “a very strong influence” on him, admiringly noting that the Ronsons are:

driven for the cause of the Jewish people in Britain and in Israel.

Other financial backers include Sue Woodford-Hollick, the wife of Labour peer Clive Hollick. Hollick contributed £50,000 to Starmer’s 2020 leadership campaign and was another funder of McSweeney’s Labour Together outfit. He previously served as a special adviser to both Epstein-associate Mandelson and long-standing Labour Friend of Israel Margaret Beckett. Hollick is also a director of Honeywell, a US conglomerate that claims to provide “battle-tested technologies” to “the most advanced defence forces in the world”.

Jury trials are not a filter for prejudice

Lammy’s previous claim that juries “act as a filter for prejudice” is now in conflict with the biases of his backers. It is also clear that Sackman’s trust in Israeli society’s ability to hold its leaders to account is not extended to UK citizens. It is far from a coincidence that this assault on the right to trial by jury is accompanied by the fact that juries have repeatedly refused to convict pro-Palestine actionists, who have done more than the UK government to stop a genocide. Clearly, the Labour party is entirely in the pockets of Zionist lobbyists whose undue interference in our democratic processes is extremely troubling, to say the least.

Lammy and his co-conspirators are determined to undermine our right to a trial by a jury of our peers nonetheless. By examining the political ideology – Zionism – that underpins Starmer’s cabinet, we can begin to understand why.

Featured image via the Canary