Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Streeting is lying to trans kids in Pink News

Published

on

Streeting is lying to trans kids in Pink News

Pink News have run an article penned by Labour’s Wes Streeting. The health secretary ostensibly addressed young people who are worried about the fact that his party has gutted both health and social support for trans people.

Pink News describes itself as the “world’s largest and most influential LGBTQ+ led media brand”. Of course, to anyone who has followed Pink News‘ rapidly falling quality of content and shift towards a “reporter free newsroom” will be unsurprised that it’s scraping the barrel for articles now.

However, even for the Daily-Mail-but-Pink, platforming a transphobe like Streeting is lower than low. This is a man who lied through his teeth about the number of trans kids who took their own lives because of the puberty blocker ban. Worse still, he called reporting on those statistics “dangerous”.

And now we’re meant to listen to him lying through his teeth about caring?

Advertisement

Streeting – ‘about you, rather than to you’

The health secretary begins his article by stating that:

If you are a young person questioning your gender, or a parent watching your child struggle with who they are, this moment of reassessing how NHS gender services are accessed and deployed may feel frightening.

You might be worried about what comes next. You might feel uncertain, unheard, or invisible in a debate that too often talks about you, rather than to you.

So let me begin here: you matter. Your feelings are real. And you deserve care, dignity and understanding.

Not once, in this entire piece, does Streeting refer to the trans kids he’s talking to as ‘trans kids’. He calls them young people “questioning” their gender.

Advertisement

He says [trans kids] deserve dignity, but he won’t even acknowledge their identity. The closest he manages is “every trans person, every child deserves to feel safe”.

‘I remember what it felt like’

This refusal of acknowledgement makes his subsequent speech about his own sexuality particularly two-faced:

I know, from my own life, how powerful and sometimes overwhelming questions of identity can be.

Growing up gay, I remember what it felt like to wonder if I would be accepted, whether I would be safe, and whether the world would make space for me as I was.

Streeting grew up gay, fearing that he wouldn’t be accepted. I wonder if he is capable of the empathy to imagine himself in trans kids’ place now?

Advertisement

To the trans kids who have had their medication pathways ripped away from them on blatantly ideological grounds, Streeting isn’t showing the “love, acceptance and support” of his “amazing family and friends”.

To those trans kids he calls “questioning”, is Streeting meaningfully different from the politicians who talked about gay people as “a pretended family relationship” when he was growing up?

Is his government’s guidance urging a “very careful approach” when a child “asks” to socially transition in schools closer to championing LGBTQ+ rights, or to Section 28’s ban on teaching materials that “intentionally promote homosexuality”?

‘Support is not on hold’

Streeting goes on to talk about the pause on the PATHWAYS puberty blocker trial for a review of “aspects of its design and safety”. Of course, he fails to mention that the review was proposed by a man who happened to be recused due to his openly transphobic social media posting immediately afterwards.

Advertisement

The health secretary also states that:

At the same time, there is a proposal to stop routinely offering puberty blockers and hormone treatments to under-18s while more evidence is gathered about long-term effects.

A masterclass in the use of the passive voice there. Likewise, Streeting also masterfully neglected to mention that the proposal was based on a study that used a bizarre set of inclusion criteria that just happened to rule out almost all positive evidence for said treatments. Funny that, isn’t it?

In spite of these pauses and halts on treatment, the health secretary nevertheless tries to insist that:

Support is not on hold.

Young people referred to services are being seen by mental health and paediatric teams, with help available while you wait for specialist care.

Advertisement

What use is mental health care to the trans boy who is being forced to undergo puberty because of his government’s transphobic ideology? Counseling doesn’t stop his hips from widening or his chest from growing.

What use is mental health care to the trans girl whose voice breaks because the blocker trial is on hold? Every time she speaks in a tenor from now on, as the dysphoria bites, she’ll know whose fault that is. Will she take solace in the fact that some sniveling prick of a health secretary said her feelings are valid?

‘Questioning the government’s commitment’

At the end of his marathon of hypocrisy, omissions, and outright lies, Streeting widens his address:

I also want to speak to the wider LGBTQ+ community, and to anyone questioning the government’s commitment.

I hear those concerns. I understand why trust feels fragile right now.

Advertisement

But let me say this clearly: every trans person, every child deserves to feel safe, respected, and included in our society and in the health system that serves them. That is not up for debate.

There will be disagreements of course. This is a deeply complex area, and people come to it with different perspectives and experiences.

People are questioning this government’s commitment because, among many other reasons, every LGBTQ+ individual in the country watched the prime minister go from saying ‘trans women are women’ to saying the exact opposite, overnight.

We’re questioning your commitment because we watched you, Wes Streeting, call for the segregation of trans people. We watched you lie about the suicides caused by policies that you inherited and endorsed.

Advertisement

Social murder

There’s something uniquely loathsome about the sucking moral vacuum in the shape of a man that is Wesley Paul William Streeting.

There’s a level of open lying in his dealing that speaks to his utter contempt for other people. This is a health secretary who claims to hate NHS privatisation. However, he takes tens of thousands in donations from the private providers his party is selling the service to.

Likewise, this is a health secretary who tries to tell the public to hate the doctors for striking. Meanwhile, he bleats to the doctors that they should undermine their union. And, of course, who could forget his taking a massive MPs’ pay rise whilst threatening to rip training positions away from doctors?

Streeting is a politician who uses being gay as part of his justification for the blatantly transphobic things he does. And yes, calling for trans segregation and removing our healthcare is transphobic, even if Pink News platforms his claims to care.

Advertisement

In sociology and political theory, the concept of ‘social murder’ refers to an unnatural death caused by the structure of society itself, and by the politicians that help shape that structure.

There’s a part of me that wonders if Streeting is ever kept awake at night by the thought of the kids who died at his far-removed hand. I doubt it.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Newcastle set for UK and Europe’s first Palestinian memorial

Published

on

Newcastle set for UK and Europe’s first Palestinian memorial

A new memorial for Palestinian civilians could be added to Newcastle’s Peace Garden following a proposal supported by local councillors and community groups.

The Peace Garden, located within the grounds of Newcastle’s Civic Centre, was established as a space for remembrance and reflection for communities affected by war, genocide and violence.

Councillor Habib Rahman has led the new initiative. His work with Newcastle City Council helped create the memorial area.

Two memorials have already been installed in the garden. In 2024, a memorial stone was unveiled in remembrance of the genocide against the Tutsi people of Rwanda, supported by Newcastle’s Rwandan community.

Advertisement

A second memorial was installed in 2025 to recognise the genocide against the Roma people. At the same time, an oak tree was planted to commemorate Jewish refugees and victims of the Srebrenica genocide.

Plans for memorial stone and olive tree

Rahman has now proposed a further memorial stone to honour Palestinian civilians who have lost their lives during the Israel–Gaza conflict. The proposal also includes planting an olive tree as a symbol of remembrance.

The idea was presented to Newcastle city council leader Karen Kilgour and referenced in a cabinet update to full council in March 2026 under future considerations for the Peace Garden.

Council documents state that Rahman is facilitating discussions with the local Palestinian community, to establish a permanent memorial within the Civic Centre grounds.

Advertisement

Council arboriculture specialists are currently considering the most suitable location within the Civic Centre green spaces to plant the olive tree.

The item was not discussed in detail at the March council meeting as the session was dominated by budget discussions. However, Rahman later wrote to the council leader requesting that the proposal be progressed through a council and cabinet decision.

He also confirmed that the full cost of the memorial and tree planting would be covered entirely by the community.

In a letter responding to the proposal, a council officer confirmed formal acceptance of the plan to install a permanent memorial commemorating innocent Palestinian civilians.

Advertisement

Rahman said he was proud of the work that had gone into creating the Peace Garden:

I am immensely proud of the work undertaken to establish the Peace Garden. As a City of Sanctuary, it is fitting that Newcastle has a dedicated space for remembrance and reflection.
It reflects our city’s long-standing tradition of solidarity, our stance against genocide and war, and our commitment to empathy and remembrance.

He added:

We have already made history with memorials recognising the genocide against the Tutsi people of Rwanda and the genocide against the Roma people.

By establishing a memorial for the Palestinian people, alongside the planting of an olive tree, we have the opportunity to make history again, which we will now work towards a date later this year.

Mohammed Wafi, of the Palestine Community North East, said:

Advertisement

We thank Councillor Rahman for his leadership in securing this historic approval. This memorial will mean a great deal to our community, and we will now work with him and the Council to deliver it.

Rahman said he would continue working with Newcastle’s Palestinian community and the city council to deliver the memorial later this year.

When completed, this will become the first Palestinian memorial of its kind in the UK and Europe.

Featured image supplied

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

TUC calls for urgent support for at-risk manufacturers as illegal war fuels Trumpflation

Published

on

TUC calls for urgent support for at-risk manufacturers as illegal war fuels Trumpflation

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has called for a targeted emergency package to protect UK companies from the effects of Donald Trump’s illegal war. The union body refers to at-risk manufacturers like chemicals, ceramics and glass. And it says:

Trump’s war must not put jobs in critical industries at risk.

In the face of “Trumpflation” sending gas and energy prices soaring, the TUC argues that urgent support is needed to protect energy intensive sectors from the economic damage of the war. Of course, any impact on the UK pales in comparison with the horrors in countries directly under attack. But the TUC points out the war and its consequences could affect thousands of UK jobs.

The call comes after the OECD warns the UK faces the biggest hit to growth of all G20 economies from the war in West Asia.

Emergency measures for most at-risk manufacturers

Immediate support should focus on the most at-risk businesses to protect key UK manufacturing sectors, the TUC says.

Advertisement

Gas-intensive businesses face the most immediate exposure in the current energy crisis. The union body is therefore calling for a temporary targeted gas price cap to stabilise the price of gas for critical industries. This would target sectors where gas accounts for at least 70% of energy demand (like ceramics), or at least 70% of raw materials.

As the effects of the war flow through to higher electricity prices for industry, the TUC is also calling for the government urgently to speed up its energy price support scheme (the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme – BICS) and make sure it reaches the manufacturing sites that need it the most. Many manufacturers (beyond those in gas-intensive industries) were already struggling before the crisis hit, and are now in even more need of support.

Fix the foundations to prevent future crises

Support must also go beyond the immediate crisis, the TUC argues. The UK has been at the “mercy of global gas markets for too long”. With an unstable president in the White House, and increasing volatility across the globe, UK households and businesses cannot afford to be “lurching from crisis to crisis”.

Alongside immediate-term support, the UK desperately needs structural change and investment so that industry doesn’t bear the brunt of future gas price spikes. This will also mean there is less need for government to step in during each crisis.

Advertisement

The TUC is calling for government to de-link electricity prices from gas. This would move the UK from being a price-taker to a price-maker. The government should also radically increase UK gas storage capacity, and accelerate investment in energy efficiency and electrification upgrades.

These proposals to reform the UK’s energy system and market design and to upgrade UK industry will reduce the UK’s industrial vulnerability to external crises, boost long-term resilience of domestic industries, and help protect good jobs for the long-run. Fixing the foundations of the UK’s energy market would support not just gas-intensive industries, but wider manufacturing like steel, metal and paper.

TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said:

Already struggling before the war, Trumpflation has sent gas prices soaring – further piling the pressure on some of Britain’s key industries like chemicals, ceramics and glass.

Trump’s war must not put jobs in critical industries at risk.

Advertisement

The government should urgently bring forward a temporary targeted gas price cap, to stabilise the price of gas for critical industries and protect UK manufacturing, and speed up the energy price support scheme making sure it reaches crucial sectors.

Smart government action can stop us lurching from crisis to crisis. The UK has been at the mercy of global gas markets for too long.

Now is the time to fix the foundations, reducing the UK’s vulnerability to global gas price shocks, boosting resilience of key industries, and protecting good jobs for the long-run.

Chief executive of Make UK Stephen Phipson said:

Advertisement

The war in Iran has highlighted vulnerabilities in the UK energy market that have been evident for some time and have not been addressed, the more that action is delayed the greater the risk of rapid deindustrialisation.

This now requires, urgent, efficient, and substantive action to bring down the cost of energy for industry as the clock is now approaching midnight for many companies.

This must start with the immediate implementation of the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme to all manufacturers otherwise we could face a rapid unravelling of British industry.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Faulty HMS Dragon Withdraws to Port

Published

on

The Mail reports that HMS Dragon, the only warship of Britain’s in the Middle Eastern region, has withdrawn to port “for repairs and logistics after experiencing issues with its fresh water supplies.” No comment…

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Home Office lying about ages of detained children

Published

on

Home Office lying about ages of detained children

The Home Office is routinely detaining so-called “age-disputed children” as adults as part of its ‘One in, one out’ asylum scheme. That’s according to an investigation from the independent Humans for Rights Network.

Despite Labour’s increasingly far-right anti-asylum posturing, it remains illegal to detain unaccompanied child asylum seekers in adult detention centers. However, the Home Office is routinely ignoring this rule by claiming that these children are, possibly, adults.

Home Office – ‘one in, one out’

In the seven months since ‘One in, one out’ began last September, the Home Office has detained 76 ‘age-disputed’ kids. However, Freedom of information (FOI) requests issued to local authority children’s services have found that claimants treated as adults by the Home Office are often later determined to be children by social workers.

Indeed, of the 76 detainees, 26 have either been reassessed as children by Social Services, or are in the process of being. Meanwhile, 11 kids are waiting for age assessment. The Home Office has already forcibly deported 13 to France.

Advertisement

Damningly, one child was confirmed to be a minor after being forcibly deported.

Among the kids in question, a large proportion are Sudanese, Eritrean, or Afghan – all zones of intense and brutal conflict. Humans for Rights Network spokesperson Maddie Harris stated that:

Many of these children are survivors of torture and trafficking and are experiencing acute declines in their mental health as a result of what is often months of detention in the UK.

These children are additionally prejudiced from accessing the care and support they are entitled to as children as well as adequate, social worker-led local authority age assessments. No child should be detained, with those who remain in detention immediately released to allow them to recover and to ensure they are able to access age assessments conducted in the community where required.

The National Age Assessment Board

Home Office age assessments fall under the domain of the National Age Assessment Board (NAAB). Watchdog groups like the Refugee and Migrant Children’s Consortium (RMCC) and Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI) have raised pressing concerns about NAAB’s processes and transparency.

Advertisement

In particular, NAAB blurs the boundaries between ‘independent’ social workers and immigration enforcement. Likewise, it also has a massive negative impact on the kids in its ‘care’, and its decisions are deeply questionable. An RMCC report stated that:

Multiple legal cases have found NAAB assessments to be flawed, with issues including failure to apply the benefit of the doubt; reliance on subjective or culturally inappropriate indicators; and the dismissal of credible evidence from professionals who know the child. Judges have criticised the NAAB’s approach as being adversarial, inconsistent with guidance, and lacking in objectivity.

Back on 25 March, the High Court was forced to step in to prevent the Home Office from deporting two ‘age-disputed’ kids. Solicitor Elizabeth Cole, who represented one of the children, explained the level of disregard the Home Office displayed:

The Home Office’s contention that claimed a child’s age need not be determined as a matter of fact prior to their removal is highly concerning, and clearly warrants proper consideration by the court. This is particularly so as children are an extremely vulnerable group. We hope this decision will encourage the Home Office to think twice before trying to remove any disputed children to France, in order to alleviate the distress and harm which will inevitably ensue by result.

Routine inhumanity

The Guardian confronted the Home Office with the Humans for Rights Networks’ record of its mistreatment of asylum seekers. However, the government department chose to issue a stock response:

This government is bearing down on small boat crossings. We have stopped over 42,000 illegal migrants attempting to cross the channel since the election. We have removed or deported almost 60,000 people who were here illegally.

But we are going further to remove the incentives that draw illegal migrants to this country and increase removals and deportations of those with no right to be here.

Advertisement

Apparently, those “incentives that draw illegal migrants” include the laws which require treating traumatised children with the care they so desperately need. After all, all the Home Office needs to do is state that they’re lying about being kids. Then, miracle of miracles, it’s free to deport them. No reasonable doubt needed.

If you still needed proof of the utter routine inhumanity of  successively more anti-asylum governments, then look no further.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Israel targets Iran’s railways infrastructure

Published

on

Israel targets Iran's railways infrastructure

Israel seems to believe warnings negate war crimes

The IOF tweeted an urgent warning in Farsi earlier Tuesday, telling people across Iran to avoid trains and railway lines until 9 pm local time.

Iran’s cultural heritage minister, Reza Salehi Amiri, wrote to UNESCO on Tuesday following the IOF’s war crimes.

He called IOF’s actions a clear attack on the common heritage of humanity, calling for a clear, immediate, and deterrent stance from UNESCO, as the Tehran Times reported.

Advertisement

Trump has called for further escalation. In his latest bizarre rant on Tuesday, Trump said he would wipe out the country unless it opened the straits of Hormuz ahead of a deadline he’d set for 8 pm on 7 April 2026. Trump said on Truth Social:

A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?

The whole US administration is either too ignorant to understand the nuclear threat behind Trump’s rant or is just going along with it. JD Vance, seemingly, endorsed Trump’s policies, whatever they may be,  after the expiration of the deadline.

The IOF and the US are operating without any restraint in their war against Palestine, Lebanon, and Iran, using similar tactics of total war, with no distinction between military and civilian targets.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

petition to kick firm out of UK gains momentum

Published

on

petition to kick firm out of UK gains momentum

A petition started by Zack Polanski to kick Palantir out of UK public services has nearly 160,000 signatures.

Palantir is a secretive US tech firm. It’s embedding itself in UK public services, including running a huge patient database for the NHS.

Essentially, the company helps government spy agencies collect huge amounts of private data about citizens – including ICE in the US and the Israeli military.

Advertisement

But it also provides terrifying AI-powered military tools to the Israeli government, which it uses to carry out its Genocide in Gaza, along with its recent attacks in Iran and Lebanon.

Peter Thiel co-founded the company. Unsurprisingly, he is a billionaire Trump donor and close friend of Jeffrey Epstein.

However, the UK CEO is Louis Mosley, grandson of British fascist, Oswald Mosley.

Palantir infiltrating Britain

The company has slowly made its way into British infrastructure. During the pandemic, the government suspiciously handed Palantir a huge contract – supposedly worth only £1. This was to create a COVID-19 data store that would provide ministers with real-time information on health services and the pandemic.

Advertisement

Now, it has contracts worth over £500m with the UK government alone. This includes software which NHS doctors and nurses are flat-out refusing to use because of ‘privacy’ and ‘human rights concerns.

Palantir also has a £240m deal with the UK military. Again, there was no competitive tender process, and the government just handed Palantir the deal.

The Petition to kick Palantir out of UK public services, started by Zack Polanski, has close to 160,000 signatures. It emphasises:

But right now we’ve got a major chance to get their NHS deal scrapped – and kick start a domino effect that sees ALL their contracts ended.

How? Ministers actually have the option to cancel the NHS deal early. But with these contracts flying under the radar, it’ll take all of us speaking up to make that happen. If you agree that our NHS and other public services shouldn’t be cutting deals with a private company that helps armies kill people, sign the petition now!

Featured image via 38Degrees

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

President Threatens Iran, Sparks Impeachment Calls

Published

on

President Threatens Iran, Sparks Impeachment Calls

The US president’s latest deranged Truth Social post came just hours before the deadline he imposed for Tehran to start allowing traffic to pass through the key waterway.

Around one-fifth of the global oil supply is transported through the strait, but it has been effectively closed since America and Israel began bombing Iran at the end of February.

Trump announced over the weekend that Tehran had until 1am tomorrow UK time to confirm they were ceasing attacks on ships trying to use the strait or else “all hell will reign down” on them.

In a follow-up post on Truth Social on Sunday, he said: “Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH!”

Advertisement

Posting on Tuesday morning, Trump said: “A whole civilisation will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalised minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end. God Bless the Great People of Iran!”

His comments were widely condemned online, with leading Republican and former White House official Bill Kristol calling for Trump to be impeached.

Veteran journalist and broadcast Andrew Neil said: “Is there anybody, any group, capable of staging an intervention in the White House?”

Piers Morgan, a former Trump supporter, described the president’s statement as “a brazen pre-admission of genocide … which would obviously be a war crime”.

Advertisement

Other responses on X were equally critical of the president’s comments.

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Alison Hammond Denies Strictly Come Dancing And Celebrity Traitors Claims

Published

on

Alison Hammond Denies Strictly Come Dancing And Celebrity Traitors Claims

Alison Hammond has ruled herself out of hosting Strictly Come Dancing, as well as extinguishing hopes of an appearance on Celebrity Traitors.

Alison competed on the show back in 2014, where she was partnered with Aljaz Skorjanec and ultimately became the sixth celebrity to be eliminated the same year Caroline Flack and Pasha Kovalev went on to win the coveted glitterball trophy.

In an interview with Radio Times, Alison revealed she had, indeed, been in talks about stepping into the Strictly presenter role, but that she was unable to take on the mammoth task.

“I have, actually,” she said, responding to whether she’d been approached about the job. “You didn’t expect that answer, did you? I can’t lie, I’m incapable.”

Advertisement

Alison explained that her packed schedule meant she wasn’t able to commit to Strictly, while also ruling herself out of another fan favourite show that she’d previously been rumoured for.

She continued: “I’m so busy, babes, that I’m not sure it’s going to happen. It’s unrealistic. I’m so happy they considered me but, like Traitors, I can’t do it because everything clashes.”

“I would have loved to have done it – anybody that gets it, they’re going to land the perfect job. But I’m so happy with everything I’ve got. What would I drop, to do Strictly?”

Alison was originally reported by tabloids to be undergoing “chemistry tests” for the Strictly role while she also made no secret of her hopes to host the show during an appearance on Loose Women back in December.

Advertisement

“I’m absolutely Claudia – I’m upstairs,” she said, referring to which of the live show’s roles she’d be best suited to.

“Whoever gets that job, what an amazing job to get. It’s the dream job,” she added, before joking that the Strictly presenting gig was made for her. “The BBC don’t know it yet, but it’s going to happen.”

As for who will replace Tess and Claudia, names reportedly still in the running include Zoe Ball, Emma Willis, Angela Scanlon and Johannes Radebe.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Are Politicians Taking Misogyny Seriously Enough?

Published

on

Are Politicians Taking Misogyny Seriously Enough?

There’s no denying that misogyny has been a hot topic in Westminster in recent months.

Politicians have not been shy when it comes to weighing in on moments like Louis Theroux’s recent documentary, Inside The Manosphere, and last year’s Netflix drama Adolescence.

Both cultural moments raised serious questions about the way men are being influenced in the modern era and how women are protected.

But the subject has hit close to home for several in Downing Street, too.

Advertisement

Keir Starmer has been accused of setting up a “boys’ club” at the top of government while female cabinet ministers claim unnamed officials have been issuing “sexist briefings” against them.

The topic then came to a head earlier this year when the depth of Peter Mandelson’s relationship with the late convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein was revealed by the US Department of Justice.

The former Labour peer was chosen by prime minister to be the ambassador to the US last year. Though he was fired after a handful of months in the job, questions remain over just why he got the plum role in the first place.

How was his association with Epstein – elements of which had been reported on by the time of his appointment – overlooked by senior figures in the government?

Advertisement

Labour vowed to champion equality when in opposition, celebrated when a record number of female MPs were elected in 2024, and rolled out a Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy earlier this year.

But, as politicians face accusations of not reflecting these attitudes in their everyday lives, there are fears this is akin to paying lip service to a wider issue – especially with women in Westminster often feeling the direct effects of sexism themselves.

During Thursday’s episode of Commons People with guest Millie Cooke – The Independent’s political correspondent – we look at how Westminster deals with misogyny – and what else can be done to improve it.

Listen to find out more below…

Advertisement

Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Concussion Symptoms To Watch For Days After A Brain Injury

Published

on

Vision issues, concentration problems and headaches can all come on days after a concussion.

When I tripped over my daughter’s bathroom stool and hit my head on the bathtub, I thought it was harmless. I didn’t lose consciousness or even have a bump on my head.

It wasn’t until hours later that I started feeling fatigued and a bit off. A few days later, I thought I felt back to normal until I tried to work on my laptop — and the world started spinning. A pounding headache and intense brain fog followed, and then I knew I was dealing with a concussion.

“Many people who experience a concussion don’t actually feel any of the symptoms until hours later,” explained Dr. Daniel Daneshvar, the chief of Spaulding’s brain injury rehabilitation program and co-director of the Sports Concussion Clinic at Mass General Brigham in Massachusetts.

Additionally, symptoms can “intensify or evolve over the first several days,” added Dr. Kevin Bickart, an assistant professor in neurology at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles.

Advertisement

Because of this, the criteria for diagnosing a concussion now include symptoms that appear within a 72-hour window, according to the 2023 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

While many know to pay attention to symptoms right after a head injury, it’s often overlooked to watch for those that may appear hours, days or even weeks later. And because head injuries are common and can be debilitating, it’s important to know what to look for and when you need to seek help.

We talked to neurologists and concussion experts about these unexpected delayed symptoms, why they may not appear right away and what it means if you’re experiencing them.

First of all, what is a concussion exactly?

Advertisement

A concussion is a brain injury that’s “caused when the cells in the brain, the neurones, stretch or get otherwise damaged,” explained Daneshvar. “What happens then is the cells that are normally well-regulated in sending messages … [to] one another start sending messages erratically and in an uncontrolled fashion.”

These brain cells start using way more energy than they receive, and this “energy crisis” causes symptoms to appear, he said.

Concussion symptoms can really vary because this is “happening in the brain that controls everything from balance [and] headache[s] [to] vision, mood [and] memory,” added Dr. Shae Datta, a neurologist and co-director of the NYU Langone Concussion Center.

These changes in the brain are microscopic and often don’t appear in imaging like a CT or MRI scan, she said. Imaging only detects larger structural issues, like a brain bleed, significant swelling or skull fracture. So identifying symptoms is a key part of diagnosing a concussion.

Advertisement

What signs or symptoms should you watch for after you hit your head, even hours or days later?

One of the first signs people often look for after hitting their heads are bumps, bruises or other marks of injury. But this doesn’t necessarily mean you have a concussion.

“There isn’t a great connection between what you see on the outside of the skull and what’s going on inside,” Daneshvar noted.

While every individual is different, usually in the first 24 hours after a concussion you may experience more physical symptoms, like dizziness, headaches, nausea and sensitivity to light and noise, Bickart said. About three to seven days later, cognitive and emotional symptoms may pop up, such as anxiety, irritability, trouble focusing, memory issues and brain fog.

Advertisement

“This ‘second wave’ often catches patients off guard because they thought they were recovering,” he explained.

That said, every brain injury is unique, so any of these symptoms could appear immediately or later on, Datta added.

For example, “it doesn’t always happen that no irritability occurs immediately,” Bickart said. “Some people after a concussion can become completely emotionally dysregulated in the moment … crying hysterically … It’s not the most common thing that occurs, but it can.”

Symptoms can also transform over time. For instance, the pain of headaches (the most common concussion symptom) may feel different days or weeks later. Initially, it might feel like “pressure and pounding” all over the head and then eventually be “more intermittent … and only on one side,” he explained.

Advertisement

Disruptions in your sleep-wake cycles may change from feeling like you need to sleep more to actually having insomnia later on, Bickart said.

Vision issues could also evolve and include blurred or double vision or difficulties with focusing the eyes and tracking objects, according to the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Vision issues, concentration problems and headaches can all come on days after a concussion.

Fiordaliso via Getty Images

Vision issues, concentration problems and headaches can all come on days after a concussion.

Why can symptoms appear delayed?

“Immediately after a hit, the brain dumps adrenaline and burns [energy] rapidly … which can mask symptoms,” Bickart said. “It is only hours or days later, when the brain’s energy fuel … is depleted” that symptoms may become more apparent.

Advertisement

Especially if the injury happens in a sports environment, it may not be “until the adrenaline wears off that you start to notice, ‘Hey, I’m feeling kind of tired actually’ or ’I’m having trouble concentrating,” Daneshvar explained.

Additionally, damage from the injury can lead to inflammation in the brain and affect different cells, he said.

Inflammation “often doesn’t peak until three to seven days post-injury,” Bickart said. This is what can “drive that ‘second wave’ of brain fog and fatigue.”

Lastly, as an individual returns to work, school or other everyday demands after resting, they may observe new symptoms “because they [haven’t] exposed … or pushed themselves” in this way yet.

Advertisement

What should you do if you experience delayed symptoms?

“Just because the symptoms are delayed, it doesn’t [necessarily] mean something catastrophic is going on,” Daneshvar said. “The important thing to note is … if symptoms are worsening rather than improving … or if … [there are] red flag symptoms.”

Red flags that you should go to the emergency room include a worsening headache, increased confusion, repeated vomiting, losing consciousness for more than 30 seconds, blood or fluid coming from the ears or nose, changes in your vision, constant ringing in the ears, weakness, seizures, difficulty speaking and large head bumps and bruises, according to Mayo Clinic.

If you experience delayed symptoms (after 48 hours) that don’t require emergency care, reach out to your primary care doctor and they can help you decide if a referral to a neurologist or imaging is necessary, advised Dr. Dharti Dua, a neurologist at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.

Advertisement

You also want to get adequate rest and be careful not to get another concussion soon after because this makes you “more prone to a delayed recovery,” she said.

If symptoms appear days later, stop the activity that triggered them, but do not retreat to a dark room for days,” Bickart said. “We now know that strict rest beyond 48 hours actually prolongs symptoms.”

For symptoms that last beyond two weeks, active treatments are recommended, he added. For example, vestibular rehabilitation therapy treats dizziness and balance issues, and cognitive therapy teaches strategies for managing brain fog.

Datta advises looking for concussion centres because they specialise in brain injuries and offer a multidisciplinary team.

Advertisement

“It takes more than one kind of doctor to diagnose and manage you,” she explained.

These centres often include concussion experts from neurologists to physical therapists to neuro-ophthalmologists.

“The hopeful sentiment is that a concussion is very treatable. Most people recover pretty quickly, within a week or two,” Bickart said. For those who may have delayed or longer lasting symptoms, “there are tons of treatments out there … [and] you can still get the right help and recover.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025