Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

Solana Expands Security Framework After Major DeFi Breach

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

STRIDE Introduces Structured Security Evaluation

Solana traded near $180 during the announcement period, reflecting stable market conditions despite recent events. The foundation launched STRIDE to standardize how protocols assess and manage risks. The framework focuses on eight areas, including governance, infrastructure, and operational security.

The program evaluates protocols independently and publishes the results for public access. This approach improves transparency for users interacting with decentralized applications. It also helps projects identify weaknesses and strengthen their defenses.

Protocols exceeding $10 million in total value locked can access funded monitoring services. Those above $100 million gain support for formal verification of smart contracts. These measures aim to reduce risks before incidents occur.

SIRN Focuses on Real-Time Threat Response

Solana introduced the Solana Incident Response Network to coordinate responses during active threats. The network includes firms such as Asymmetric Research, OtterSec, and Neodyme. It enables members to share intelligence and act quickly during security events.

Advertisement

The network prioritizes access based on protocol size and risk exposure. It connects security experts, exchanges, and infrastructure providers. This coordination improves reaction time when incidents emerge.

Experts noted that faster response could limit damage during exploits. Some analysts pointed to delays in freezing stolen assets in past incidents. A unified response network may help address such gaps.

Drift Exploit Highlights Human Security Risks

The recent breach at Drift Protocol exposed weaknesses beyond smart contract code. Attackers used social engineering to target contributors over several months. They compromised devices and gained approval access through trusted channels.

The attack bypassed traditional audits and monitoring systems. Transactions appeared valid, which made detection difficult in real time. This case highlighted the gap between technical security and human trust.

Advertisement

As a result, the new initiatives aim to address both onchain and offchain risks. The foundation emphasized that projects must still maintain strong internal security practices. It stated that ecosystem tools support, but do not replace, team responsibility.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Democrats Question CFTC Chair on Insider Trading in Prediction Markets

Published

on

Government, CFTC, Trading, Prediction Markets

The seven House members may have affirmed the commission‘s authority over prediction markets, but asked questions about its inaction on insider trading.

Seven members of the US House of Representatives sent a letter to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair Michael Selig, asking for information on the agency’s inaction on insider trading on prediction markets and event contracts related to war and conflicts.

In a Monday letter, the seven US lawmakers said that the CFTC had the authority under the Commodities Exchange Act “to apply its rules and regulations for the purpose of preventing evasion of the [act’s] underlying swap provisions.” The statement signaled that the representatives affirmed Selig’s position that the commission had jurisdiction over prediction markets.

Advertisement

However, the House members expressed concerns about how the CFTC was policing “morally obscene” event contracts, including those on US military actions in Iran and Venezuela — in those cases, there were suspicious trades related to the timing and outcomes of US military involvement. 

“Such corrupt trades deserve swift and decisive oversight,” said the letter. “Allowing these contracts to persist raises troubling concerns about the Commission’s desire and capacity to fulfill a global regulatory role.”

Government, CFTC, Trading, Prediction Markets
Source: Representative Seth Moulton

The legal battles over regulating prediction market platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket are being waged both at a federal and state level. Several US state gaming authorities have filed lawsuits alleging that the companies are illegally offering sports bets, while the CFTC, under Selig, claims that the event contracts on the platform amount to swaps and fall under its federal regulations.

The seven House members requested that Selig respond to their six questions by April 15.

Related: Polymarket bags 97% of onchain prediction market fees after pricing overhaul

Advertisement

In one of the most recent legal decisions, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling blocking New Jersey gaming authorities from filing enforcement actions against Kalshi. Two out of three circuit judges said that the company had a ”reasonable chance of success” in arguing that federal commodities laws preempted state authorities.

CFTC enforcement director says agency is “watching” for insider trading

The Monday letter followed CFTC enforcement director David Miller responding to concerns over insider trading, which has also resulted in legislation proposed by Democrats. According to Miller, the commission would only prosecute instances “against those who tip or trade with misappropriated information,” but not dedicate resources to “trivial” cases.

Magazine: All 21 million Bitcoin is at risk from quantum computers

Advertisement