A new wave of controversy surrounds Kanye West as the UK government have blocked the rapper’s visa for a performance at a major festival. A number of sponsors withdrew from the Wireless Festival in response to a scheduled performance from West. This is due to criticism over a history of antisemitic comments.

West released a song called Heil Hitler last year, alongside selling t-shirts adorned with the swastika. West had technically apologised, but, as the Canary reported:

West published his apology as a paid full-page placement in The Wall Street Journal. That choice matters because the paper does not serve community seeking repair. Investors, executives, advertisers and institutional decision-makers make up its core readership. Ultimately, these are the people who determine whether a public figure remains commercially viable.

Kanye ‘apology’ falls flat

Clearly, the time has come where Kanye’s apologies make good business sense. And, he’s had plenty of practice with them. This is a man who said that slavery was a “choice,” who aligned himself with fascist Donald Trump, and displayed breathtaking misogyny.

West made a statement reaching out to “members of the Jewish community in London in person, to listen” insisting that he wants to “present a show of change, bringing unity, peace and love” through his music:

BREAKING: Kanye West has put out a statement responding to the Wireless Festival controversy.

Sky’s @Mollie_Malone1 has more on the story

Read more: https://t.co/400TmEufYm pic.twitter.com/Va8AtjiMF4

— Sky News (@SkyNews) April 7, 2026

Kanye West: “Those I’ve hurt”

This plea from Kanye for an opportunity to repair the harm caused by his prior antisemitic comments follows pressure from the Campaign Against Antisemitism to cancel his performance.

A spokesperson for CAA stated:

Kanye West has dedicated years of his life to trying to incite his followers to hate Jews. He has more followers than there are Jews on Earth, so his incitement has a huge impact.

Pro-Zionist Board of Deputies of British Jews have accused the festival of “profiteering from racism”, suggesting:

We think that would be a very appropriate step were the home secretary to find a way to not allow him into the country.

Needless to say, the optics are pretty ugly: cabinet officials allow genocidal war criminals to enter without objection. Yet they ban a man who’s caused harm with his antisemitic comments, but is not a genocidal war criminal.

Piers Morgan has welcomed the cancellation calls against Kanye West:

Shouldn’t even be a debate.
Kanye’s Hitler-loving, Nazi-slathering, Jew-hating bullsh*t should be disqualifying for appearances at any music festival. https://t.co/XvtRGkR6Cx

— Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) April 6, 2026

And, UK PM Keir Starmer has unsurprisingly jumped on the bandwagon to condemn the festival’s decision to give West the headline slot. He expressed his ‘deep concern’ that:

Kanye West has been booked to perform at Wireless despite his previous antisemitic remarks and celebration of Nazism.

Multiple sponsors have apparently pulled their support for the Wireless Festival, with the BBC reporting:

Rockstar Energy became the latest brand to withdraw its sponsorship of the event on Monday. The energy drink brand is owned by the same parent company as Pepsi, which pulled out on Sunday.

Fellow drinks giant Diageo has removed its support “as it stands”, while PayPal will no longer allow its branding to be used on promotional material for the festival.

Advertisement

British mineral water company Drip has clarified that it is not involved at all with this year’s festival.

Phillipson: “no place for that kind of hatred”

Multiple MPs from Labour and the Conservatives have backed calls to block West’s appearance with Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson saying:

There is no place for that kind of hatred, bigotry or antisemitism from him or from anyone else.

Tory MP Chris Philp is arguing that Mahmood’s stance on antisemitism will be clarified by her position on West’s visa:

Kanye West is guilty of appalling antisemitic and pro Nazi comments

Below I have written to the Home Secretary asking her to use her powers to ban West from travelling to the UK to appear at the Wireless concert

Advertisement

She used this power recently to ban an anti-immigration campaigner… pic.twitter.com/Cso9TYpTht

— Chris Philp MP (@CPhilpOfficial) April 6, 2026

However, Melvin Benn, the managing director of Festival Republic, has resisted public pressure to kick West to the curb. This refusal comes in light of his own experience witnessing “many episodes of despicable behaviour” which have taught him the need for forgiveness.

Benn recalled his lived experience as an anti-fascist and his time on a kibbutz, stating:

I am a deeply committed anti-fascist and have been all my adult life. I lived on a kibbutz for many months in the 1970’s that was attacked on October 7th, am pro Jew and the Jewish state, while being equally committed to a Palestinian state.

Referring to West’s past antisemitic comments in a lengthy statement, Benn said:

What Ye has said in the past about Jews and Hitler is as abhorrent to me as it is to the Jewish community, the Prime Minister and others that have commented and – taking him at his word – to Ye now also.

Finishing:

Forgiveness and giving people a second chance are becoming a lost virtue in this ever-increasing divisive world and I would ask people to reflect on their instant comments of disgust at the likelihood of him performing (as was mine) and offer some forgiveness and hope to him as I have decided to do.

🚨 BREAKING: Wireless Festival will keep Kanye West as its headliner

Melvin Benn, the Managing Director of Festival Republic, said:

“I am a deeply committed anti-fascist and have been all my adult life. I lived on a kibbutz for many months in the 1970’s that was attacked on…

Advertisement

— Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) April 6, 2026

The Board of Deputies of British Jews has since responded to Kanye’s request to speak to the Jewish community in London.

They welcomed the call to talk but still insisted he be cancelled:

The Board of Deputies of British Jews has responded to Ye’s statement on Wireless, saying they are willing to meet with Ye, but only if he agrees not to perform at the festival this year:

“We are willing to meet Kanye West as part of his journey of healing, but only after he… https://t.co/3j2x3p5Lf8 pic.twitter.com/DGoED41CTp

Advertisement

— Kurrco (@Kurrco) April 7, 2026

Double standards exposed

Banning West’s entry into the UK is not an unprecedented decision – he was already denied entry to Australia last year after releasing “Heil Hitler”. What would be unprecedented though is the UK barring entry to individuals accused of genocidal crimes against Palestinians. These blood-thirsty individuals have outstanding arrest warrants from the International Criminal Court (ICC) but are seen to be welcomed into the UK’s corridors of power.

Therefore, the contrast is hard to ignore. After all, it further reveals a sinister double standard: the UK government appears willing to tolerate Israel’s violent, murderous hate yet draws the line at a singer who has expressed disgusting hatred. Kanye can be condemned, but we can’t miss the fact that Starmer and his cronies are quick to react when it comes to antisemitism – but not to actual war criminals.

Let’s be clear: antisemitism is abhorrent and must always be confronted. We do not condone Kanye’s previous antisemitic and pro-Nazi posts. But the UK’s failure to confront the deadly rise in Islamophobia and racism – fuelled by Israel’s actions against Palestinians – is just as appalling, but comes with the government’s tacit approval.

Thus, this incident highlights a serious issue in British politics: the hierarchy of racism.

Featured image via the Canary

Israel has tightened restrictions on the Ibrahimi mosque in Hebron in the occupied West Bank – claiming the measures are to protect illegal settlers in the town.

The mosque was the scene of extremist settler Baruch Goldstein’s 1994 massacre of 29 Palestinian worshippers. The atrocity was used by the occupation to further restrict local Muslims’ access to the sacred site, one of Islam’s most important. Israel fenced off the mosque but has now closed additional gates and cut off many of the alternative routes to the mosque. This has forced local people to walk kilometres to gain what access they are allowed, replicating measures imposed on the Al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem. Israel’s fascist ‘security minister’ Itamar Ben Gvir has praised Goldstein’s mass murder and today, 7 April 2026, raided Al-Aqsa mosque while announcing it would be re-opened to extremist settlers.

Israel harassing worshippers

Local resident Aref Jaber told Al Jazeera:

The difficulty of reaching the mosque is compounded by the procedures at the iron and electronic gates installed at its entrances and in its vicinity. We are subjected to searches, detention, and harassment without any justification, and often young men, boys, and even women are arrested.

The occupation had ordered the removal of mosque director Moataz Abu Sneineh and his staff for more than two weeks in January and has begun preventing the call to prayer “dozens of times a month”. It then used its attacks on Iran as an excuse to close the mosque completely for six days from the end of February and continues to limit the numbers who can attend. The site is considered a major Islamic holy site and a national symbol of Palestine, making it a target for Israel’s ethno-fascist leadership that denies the Palestinian people even exists and claims the site as the ‘Cave of the [Jewish] Patriarchs’.

Award-winning human rights activist Issa Amro, who directs the Youth Against Settlements group, said that the situation at the mosque is even more dangerous than al-Aqsa, adding that:

The Jewish area [of the mosque] has been expanded, and recently, residents around the mosque have been living a difficult life due to soldier violence, settler terrorism, the constant closure of barriers, and restrictions on leaving their homes. They live as prisoners in their own homes in fear of settlers and soldiers, and disturbed by the constant gatherings held by settlers in the mosque.

Israel is an apartheid, terror state.

Featured image via the Canary

The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has announced that the UK shot down multiple Iranian drones in a ‘high threat area’ overnight on April 4. This is despite Starmer repeatedly claiming that the country will not back up the US and Israel’s illegal attacks on Iran.

Update on UK operations in the Middle East, 5 April 2026. pic.twitter.com/D3wqHH1BDR

— Ministry of Defence 🇬🇧 (@DefenceHQ) April 5, 2026

The announcement also states that:

UK Typhoons and F-35 jets, supported by Voyager and Royal Navy Merlin and Wildcat helicopters, have continued their defensive missions over the Eastern Mediterranean, Jordan, Bahrain and UAE.

Did the MOD finally admit that the UK is backing up Israel and the US? Or is this still Starmer’s idea of ‘not involved’ and ‘defensive actions’?

In this latest post, the UK MOD appear to admit that Britain is now an active participant in the war.

Starmer’s denials notwithstanding. https://t.co/uw1vBD8oUL

— Loose Cannon News (@LooseCannonNews) April 6, 2026

Starmer dragging UK into illegal war

Either way, it seems that Starmer’s words and actions are not quite matching up, which is nothing new. However, his actions are dragging the UK even further into the wrong side of an illegal war. 

Starmer will continue to tell us we’re not involved Israel and the US’ illegal war, whilst at the same time getting us further involved.

Actually scandalous. https://t.co/RwZKAD5r15

Advertisement

— Juliet Brown 🇵🇸🍉 (@JulietB270880) April 6, 2026

What is Starmer’s definition of ‘involved’? Someone should throw a dictionary at his head.

If this is what not being involved in Trump and Netanyahu’s war looks like I’d hate to see what being involved looks like. https://t.co/thT9q2bIiX

— Brian Tweedale (@BrianHTweed) April 5, 2026

Government says “the uk isn’t getting involved”

Government proceeds to post updates about where way they’re getting involved!

Advertisement

Labour party are liars and must be removed from Government! https://t.co/j1vB4CskYL

— Loki (@TH3ELECTRODE) April 6, 2026

Make your mind up

Since the middle of March, the US military has been loading large explosives into B-1 Lancer bombers at RAF Fairford in Gloucester. The government has attempted to cover this up – literally, using plastic sheeting and fencing. However, there is no hiding 2,000lb bombs.

Starmer has approved 27 US bombers to land, refuel, arm, and use UK military bases as a launchpad for strikes against Iran …..

Then the RAF fighter planes over the Middle East are shooting down drones and missiles when Iran retaliates!

Advertisement

But we’re not involved!

— Susan Rees 💚💚💚 (@bobbybobbyrees) April 6, 2026

The US is also using RAF Lakenheath and Mildenhall in Suffolk, and Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.

Seems a little bit like the UK directly supporting war crimes to me?

To make matters worse, Byline Times then linked the components used in the Tomahawk missiles which hit a girls’ school in Mibab, to two defence companies with a strong presence in the UK – BAE Systems and Raytheon.

The US missiles murdered around 165 school girls on February 28 in a double-tap attack. The second missile killed sheltering survivors, two first responders, and the parent of a murdered child.

Whilst these were provided by private companies, rather than the government, both hold extensive contracts with the UK government for military equipment.

Priorities

As usual, the UK government is spending money on illegal wars that no one supports, instead of funding vital public services.

No money for public services but always to get in wars we say we’re not getting involved in https://t.co/40RbltgyVS

— Sam Smith (@sammmsmith_) April 6, 2026

Dear British MOD – You are participating in an illegal war of aggression without the consent of the British people, there has been no debate in Parliament and my elected representative has had no say. Stop this illegal activity immediately, you have no democratic mandate.

— Enlightened_Citizen@JohnStuartMill (@JS_Mill_Acolyte) April 6, 2026

But Starmer will never stick up to Trump. Imagine putting innocent people in harm’s way for the sake of an orange nonce.

British prime minister putting our troops lives on the line for some yank nonce https://t.co/x4OP3da0Xe

— Labour’s Biggest Hater #FreePalestine🇵🇸 (@aturtleoverseas) April 6, 2026

Advertisement

Starmer uses the same bullshit definition of ‘not being involved’ as Donald Trump does when he talks about the Epstein Files. It’s bullshit. Is it even a case of Starmer needing to make up his mind? Or is it more like Starmer lying to the public and thinking we’re all too thick to notice?

Feature image via Guardian News/ YouTube

New research published by Results UK to mark World Health Day calls on the UK to meet its responsibilities to the countries most affected by child undernutrition. The report found that these countries experience at least $310bn in trade-related illicit financial flows (IFFs). And it says the UK must transform its response.

Trading Hunger: How tackling illicit financial flows can help to overcome child undernutrition argues that the UK is allowing the countries most affected by child undernutrition to be harmed by IFFs.

Not only is the UK government doing far too little to support these countries directly and in global forums, it is failing to take action domestically to end the UK’s status as a hotbed for illicit finance.

Countries lose billions to corruption

The report conservatively estimates that 20 of the countries most affected by child undernutrition experienced at least $309.8 billion in trade-related IFFs in 2024. It further estimates that government revenue losses from trade-related IFFs amount to 86.3% of India’s and 65.1% of Nigeria’s domestically funded public health spending in 2023, respectively.

Tackling these and other IFFs would generate substantial resources for Global South governments, which would enable them to address child undernutrition more effectively.

Domestically, the UK government must strengthen financial transparency to prevent illicit money from undermining the integrity of Global South economies. First and foremost, it should force the British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to establish comprehensive public registers of beneficial ownership.

It should also ensure HM Revenue & Customs publishes data on wealth held by foreign nationals in UK financial institutions that can be used by all foreign authorities to crack down on IFFs.

UK response undermined by cuts

In addition, Global South governments need, and are calling for, direct support to combat IFFs. However, the UK government’s cuts to official development assistance (ODA) mean that its funding for this work is in danger.

One area in which the UK can assist these governments relates to strengthening legislation and regulations targeting IFFs. Although it is vital to protect whistleblowers and civil society.

Another area is increasing the capacity and coordination of customs, tax, financial intelligence and law enforcement authorities in Global South countries. For example by investing in digital technologies and in joint risk assessments.

At the global level, the UK must reverse its current oppositional stance, and support a United Nations (UN) Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation. The UK should also advocate for a UN coordination and oversight mechanism on IFFs.

The world needs legitimate, effective and accountable governance structures to combat IFFs, rather than the current unequal, unsuccessful and fragmented system.

Child hunger symptoms getting worse

Undernutrition is devastating for affected children and costs trillions of dollars in lost economic productivity. Yet the prevalence of wasting (ie low weight-for-height) has barely changed in recent years while the prevalence of stunting (ie low height-for-age) has actually increased.

The report demonstrates how this is happening despite the existence of extremely cost-effective child nutrition interventions. It is unacceptable that a lack of funding, driven in large measure by damage caused by IFFs, means that real-life nutrition success stories cannot be scaled up or strategically replicated in other contexts.

Sunit Bagree, author of the report for Results UK, said:

The UK lies at the centre of a web of financial secrecy and theft. The UK government must use its ongoing vice-presidency of the Financial Action Task Force, as well as upcoming opportunities starting with the UK-hosted Illicit Finance Summit in June, to fulfil its promise to support Global South governments in increasing their domestic revenues.

Forcing British Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to establish comprehensive public registers of beneficial ownership is the best way of stopping them from facilitating illicit financial flows.

Advertisement

Ensuring the Financial Conduct Authority is adequately resourced to meet its new duties for anti-money laundering supervision will crack down on the professional enablers who drive the UK’s £100bn-a-year money laundering problem.

These steps would particularly help the countries worst affected by child undernutrition to generate funds to invest in proven interventions in line with the Sustainable Development Goals.

Rosemary Mburu, executive director at pan-African advocacy organisation WACI Health, said:

We urge the UK to boost its support for the Global South to tackle illicit finance. Building the capacity and coordination of African authorities, in the context of rights-based legal and regulatory frameworks, would help them to detect and punish offences, deter and reduce illicit financial flows, and increase the recovery and repatriation of stolen assets.

It is also hugely important for the UK to now back African efforts to create a fairer global tax system through a UN tax treaty and to advocate for the UN to be at the centre of global decision-making on illicit finance. This will ensure global economic governance becomes far more inclusive, results-orientated and accountable.

Advertisement

Countering illicit financial flows is in the security and economic interests of all countries. Genuine partnerships among nations can see the battle against illicit finance translated into sorely needed investment in child nutrition.

Featured image via the Canary

The organiser of the now-cancelled Wireless music festival said that the giant corporate and then-lead sponsor Pepsi had approved Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, as the 2026 festival’s headline act.

Melvin Benn, speaking to BBC Radio 4, said the company later withdrew its sponsorship after Keir Starmer banned Ye from entering the UK in response to demands from Jewish groups.

Kanye was ‘signed off and approved’ by Pepsi

Melvin Benn, the organizer of wireless festival, says Pepsi had initially approved Ye as a headliner before later withdrawing their sponsorship pic.twitter.com/eVyRxU9h2G

— YEEZY MAFIA (@theyeezymafia) April 7, 2026

The groups demanding the ban include Israel front groups like the so-called Campaign Against Antisemitism and the Board of Deputies of British Jews, which has been behind attacks on UK protest rights and freedom of speech.

Ye has an irrefutable record of antisemitic comments and has even sold merchandise with Nazi swastikas. His “apology” in January has been rightly criticised as insincere. However, for the prime minister to arrogate decisions about which musicians can enter the UK or headline a festival is yet another blow to the wider rights to freedom of speech, which has to include the freedom to express views that offend.

Keir Starmer’s Israel-driven race toward an authoritarian police state — which has often targeted anti-genocide Jews — continues. He no doubt considers banning a racist Black musician as an easy win.

Featured image via the Canary

US President Donald Trump has called for the genocide of Iran. In his latest bizarre rant, Trump said he would wipe out the country unless it opened the straits of Hormuz ahead of a deadline he’d set for 8pm on 7 April 2026. Trump said on Truth Social:

A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?

Adding:

We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end. God Bless the Great People of Iran!

The stream-of-consciousness post was full of contradictions. Why, if the ‘regime’ has been successfully changed, does an entire civilisation need to “die”?

Why the threat of obliteration and then a nod to the ‘great people of Iran’?

And how does Trump mean to do it? Is it a nuclear threat? Or just his typical bully-boy bluster? Trump is hard to read, as ever. He is a declining man and the head of a declining empire, clearly. But we do know he has developed a taste for war crimes…

Trump’s taste for war crime

Trump’s second term has been full of war criminality. On the one hand he has supported the Israeli genocide in Gaza. And in his current attack on Iran he has said outright he is indifferent to war crimes.

As the Guardian reported:

Donald Trump has said that he was “not at all” concerned about committing possible war crimes as he again threatened to destroy Iran’s bridges and power plants if Tehran does not meet his Tuesday 8pm ET deadline to reopen the strait of Hormuz.

The Guardian’s senior international correspondent said:

In a rambling national address on Wednesday, the US president warned that if Iran did not reach an unspecified deal with him, US forces would “hit each and every one of their electric-generating plants” and “bring [Iran] back to the stone ages – where they belong”.

According to Politico, Trump expanded by arguing:

You know what’s a war crime? Having a nuclear weapon. Allowing a sick country, with demented leadership, [to] have a nuclear weapon — that’s a war crime.

However, the same article suggested the Pentagon were trying to find ways to frame Iranian energy and other infrastructure as dual civilian-military use to escape war crime allegations down the road:

The Pentagon is expanding a list of Iranian energy sites it can target for attacks to include ones that provide fuel and power to both civilians and the military, a likely workaround if the administration is accused of war crimes for striking basic infrastructure.

Trump’s colonial death-world

Trump’s comment reminds us again of the genocidal racism generated to sustain empire. Commenter Nesrine Malik reminded us in relation to Gaza in July 2025:

What does getting used to it [genocide] look like? It looks like accepting that there are certain groups of people who can be killed. That it is, in fact, reasonable and necessary that they should die in order to maintain a political system that is built on the inequality of human life.

This is what the philosopher Achille Mbembe calls “necropolitics” – the exercising of power to dictate how some people live and how others must die.

Advertisement

She goes on:

Necropolitics creates “deathworlds” where there are “new and unique forms of social existence in which vast populations are subjected to living conditions that confer upon them the status of the living dead”.

Adding:

In those deathworlds the killing of others, and the destruction of their habitat through epic military capabilities whose impact is never experienced by the citizens of the countries responsible, confer even more value on the humanity of those in the “civilised” west. They are exempt because they are good, not because they are strong. Palestinians die because they are bad, not because they are weak.

As in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, Gaza (and countless other places), so it is in Iran, as far as imperialist America is concerned.

Humiliation and decline

Politico also reminded its readers that US defence secretary Pete Hegseth gutted those parts of the Pentagon which were meant to minimise civilian harm after taking office.

US-Israel attacked Iran first on 28 February without provocation. Iran was offering unprecedented concessions in negotiations at the time. The Pentagon has since stated there was no imminent threat from Iran. And the UN’s atomic watchdog, the IAEA, has said there is no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear weapon.

The US has achieved none of its original war aims. Iran predictably closed the Straits of Hormuz, a vital oil channel, once attacked – creating a global energy crisis. Far from being defeated, Iran has said the war will continue until “the enemy’s inevitable and permanent humiliation, disgrace, regret, and surrender”. Trump came to power on an anti-war ‘America First’ ticket. He now faces worldwide humiliation.

One hundred legal experts warned that US actions in Iran could be considered war crimes on 2 April. They also said they were deeply concerned that Trump administration’s rhetoric – as evidenced above – would lead to even greater horrors.

Clearly, the War on Terror has had a corrosive effect on western institutions – like the UN and ICC – built to minimise war crimes and civilian harm after WW2. We can say this while acknowledging that those ‘rules’ were never evenly applied anyway. To the narrow degree they did exist, the meagre protections they once offered are being dismantled before our very eyes.

Featured image via the Canary

Australia’s most decorated living war hero has been charged over war crimes allegations in Afghanistan. Ben Roberts-Smith has been charged with five counts of murder.

Australia held a long inquiry into war crimes allegations by Australian SAS soldiers. The alleged crimes took place between 2009 and 2012. Australian Federal Police said:

It will be alleged that the victims were not taking part in hostilities at the time of their alleged murder in Afghanistan.

It will be alleged that the victims were detained, unarmed, and were under the control of ADF members when they were killed.

Adding:

It will be alleged that the victims were shot by the accused, or shot by subordinate members of the ADF in the presence of and acting on, the orders of the accused.

CNN reported:

Among the accusations reported were that Roberts-Smith had shot dead an unarmed Afghan teenager and kicked a handcuffed man off a cliff before ordering him to be shot dead.

War crimes

Roberts-Smith was arrested at an Australian airport on 1 April three years after he lost:

a multimillion-dollar defamation case against nine newspapers in June 2023.

As the Canary wrote at the time:

The case has been referred to as a ‘proxy’ war crimes trial.

That case resulted in a finding that the allegations were “substantially true”.

Ross Barnett, director of investigations at Australia’s Office of Special investigations (OSI) told CNN on 7 March:

We don’t have access to the crime scenes, we don’t have photographs, site plans, measurements, the recovery of projectiles, blood spatter analysis, all of those things we would normally get at a crime scene.

Roberts-Smith is a recipient of the Victoria Cross, the highest Commonwealth award for military bravery. However, these allegations have shattered the mythologies of soldierly bravery across many of the nations which took part in the War on Terror-era occupations.

The Canary wrote about the international pattern of war crimes by special forces here.

UK SAS troops are currently subject to an inquiry into alleged war crimes. The US also had its share. Significantly, US president Donald Trump made a habit of pardoning convicted US war criminals like Navy Seal Eddie Gallagher.

The War on Terror produced a pattern of war crimes allegations – not least among elite special forces units. That pattern expanded with Israel’s genocide in Gaza. An increasingly unhinged US empire struggles with its own inevitable decline, repeating the same patterns in Iran.

Featured image via the Canary

The officers’ branch of Unite has voted overwhelmingly for ‘all-out’ strike action over the refusal of Unite’s management to recognise its union.

Of a huge 80% turnout, 85% of officers voted in support of the strike.

This is the second time Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham, has faced strike action from union employees after staff working for Graham’s husband, Jack Clarke, walked out complaining of bullying, misogyny and intimidation.

The ballot result comes as Graham campaigns for re-election and as her hangers-on try to get elected on to Unite’s executive.

Unite: ‘It’s time to Reunite and end the toxicity’

The Reunite the Union activist group welcomed the strike vote and promised solidarity with the workers, which includes a “three-point plan to resolve the dispute”. A statement from the group stated it’s “time to Reunite and end the toxicity which is dividing our union”.

It continued:

Self-defeating intransigence is a familiar trait of Sharon Graham’s management.

It is the same approach which resulted in picket lines outside Holborn against a ‘toxic bullying culture,’ complete with a ‘counter-demo’ led by Graham’s self-styled enforcer Chris Stiles and our union’s Organising Director Tayra Lopes-Lister. This resulted from the BDSU researchers simply requesting a meeting with their line management over grading.

It is the same approach which forced members of our Executive Council to turn to the Certification Officer to compel Sharon Graham’s management team to disclose our union’s finances.

Advertisement

Politically, the same intransigence has led Sharon Graham to remain silent on Reform’s direct attack on our union and our members.

Industrially, the same intransigence has led important disputes to defeat. For example, the nearly six-month strike at Bakkavor in Spalding ended in members having to accept the same percentage pay offer originally rejected at the start of the dispute. That dispute was continued from above, despite growing numbers of members crossing their own picket. From Veolia to Port Talbot, a pattern of behaviour repeats itself.

A pervasive culture of toxicity and division has been created in our union. It manifests in different ways, but the cause is the same.

So bad has this alleged conduct been that more than 90% of Unite staff working at the union’s Holborn HQ voted for strike action. Three — some say four — of the five women who worked in Clarke’s department since Graham formed it and put him in charge of it have left. Union sources say they also alleged bullying and abuse.

Unite’s staff branch unanimously condemned the union’s abuse of its staff. The influential Officers National Committee (ONC) accused Graham of using Murdoch-style anti-union tactics against workers and officers unionising and taking collective action.

Now, after fighting Graham’s moves to undermine their attempts to organise since the beginning of 2025, Unite’s officer group will soon begin strike action. It is an action that may well impact her attempts to get herself and her hangers-on re-elected.

Featured image via the Canary