Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Southampton booted from playoffs over spying

Published

on

Southampton confesses to spying

Southampton confesses to spying

This is finally the end of spygate. An independent League Arbitration Panel has upheld Southampton’s expulsion from the Championship play-off final, and dismissing the team’s appeal.

As a result, Hull City will face Middlesbrough at Wembley on 23 May for the Championship play-off final. The decision upholds the earlier disciplinary commission’s sanctions. It brings a swift, uncompromising end to the saga.

Spygate saga

The saga — dubbed as Spygate — has had a relatively short-lived timeline. Middlesbrough lodged a formal complaint after a photo emerged showing a man allegedly observing their training ground. Subsequently, the English Football League (EFL) charged Southampton with multiple breaches for unauthorised filming of training sessions involving Oxford, Ipswich and Middlesbrough.

The panel upheld the ruling was proportionate while Southampton was of the view it was “manifestly disproportionate” — despite admitting to spying. Suffices to say that the arbitration panel wasn’t in agreement. In fact, two separate panels arrived at the same conclusion in quick succession.

Advertisement

Fallout and next steps

Southampton have apologised and pledged to “respond with humility,” acknowledging the damage to supporters, staff and the club’s reputation. The EFL’s remit covers club-level sanctions; the FA may now examine whether individual staff should face separate charges. These could include bans or further disciplinary measures. The written reasons for both the disciplinary commission and the arbitration panel will be published. This will offer the full evidence trail for public scrutiny.

Beyond the immediate embarrassment, the consequences are stark. Promotion to the Premier League carries huge financial rewards. These rewards are estimated in the hundreds of millions. So, to be missing out because of a regulatory breach is a heavy price. The four-point deduction next season is also a hefty sporting penalty. It could affect Southampton’s campaign long after this controversy fades from headlines.

Final word

However, questions about governance, oversight and how clubs police staff behaviour remain unanswered. The EFL process has run its course and now the FA and the wider football community will watch how the club rebuilds trust. For supporters and neutrals alike, the episode is a reminder that off-field conduct can be as decisive as what happens on it.

Featured image via Warren Little/Getty Images

Advertisement

By Faz Ali

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

The Daily Palantir: how an AI war firm connects to the right-wing Daily Telegraph

Published

on

palantir

palantir

Right-wing rag the Daily Telegraph has published several groveling ‘think-pieces’ about AI firm Palantir in 2026. The Canary even analysed one of them here. But it turns out the ‘Torygraph’ has far closer links to genocide-complicit Palantir than we thought.

Middle East Eye (MEE) published a piece on 21 May further explaining the links between the paper and the firm:

Despite mounting scrutiny over Palantir’s alleged links to human rights abuses and Israeli war crimes, several major media organisations have still partnered with the company – including German publishing giant Axel Springer, the new owner of the British newspaper The Telegraph.

Adding:

Axel Springer – which also owns Politico, Business Insider, Bild, and Welt – uses Palantir’s Foundry software across its media operations.

MEE reported that:

Advertisement

Palantir has said that Axel Springer used Foundry to integrate data from its various publications and revenue streams, helping to build what the company described as “a more agile, data-driven publishing organisation” capable of responding more effectively to shifts in consumer behaviour and audience interests.

Adding:

According to Palantir, Foundry enables Axel Springer to gain “detailed insights into readership behaviour, advertising performance, and subscription models”.

Palantir and far-right Israel supporters

Springer‘s German CEO Mathias Dopfner is an Israel fanboy of the highest order, telling the World Jewish Conference in May 2026:

I’m a goy [non-Jew] and I’m a Zionist. With all my heart, out of conviction, and with passion.

Adding:

We all shall be Zionists.

Dopfner is also is a close ally of far-right Palantir co-founder Alex Karp:

Advertisement

Between 2018 and 2019, Palantir chief executive Alexander Karp served on the publisher’s supervisory board.

Karp and Axel Springer’s CEO, Mathias Döpfner, first met years earlier “at a party during Döpfner’s university days”.

Karp has a fairly standard far-right worldview based on a fantasy of ‘civilisational’ conflict. He even published a tawdry-sounding book calling for:

the abandonment of ‘frivolous’ consumer products in the pursuit of ‘national projects’ that strengthen ‘Western civilization’ to the detriment of its perceived enemies.

Axel Springer‘s five-point corporate constitution tells a story. Point two reads:

We support the right of the State of Israel to exist and reject all forms of anti-Semitism.

Family friends in the business

And there is a family/business connection too  – Dopfner’s son, Moritz:

Advertisement

reportedly worked as chief of staff at Thiel Capital, the investment firm founded by Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel.

Moreover:

German business outlet Manager Magazin has reported that Thiel later invested in a venture capital fund established by Moritz Döpfner, providing around $50m in seed funding.

MEE said:

Just a few months after Axel Springer acquired The Telegraph, the newspaper published an opinion piece titled “In defence of Palantir”, followed by another article headlined “How Palantir became the left’s favourite conspiracy target”.

Adding:

It remains unclear whether these articles were connected to the broader relationship between Palantir and Axel Springer, or whether The Telegraph is using Palantir technology following the takeover.

Axel Springer, The Telegraph and Palantir did not respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

You can read the MEE investigation here. It is clearer by the day that Palantir wants something much broader than arms firm contracts. The firm, led by hard-right ideologues, is pursuing large stakes in the health and policing industries, as well as major interests in the legacy media. Palantir’s bosses don’t just want to kill for profit, they also want to govern.

Featured image via Getty/Luke Sharrett

By Joe Glenton

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Breaking: Five arrested over Labour’s fake Tameside ‘independent candidate’ scandal

Published

on

Tameside election fraud inquiry

Tameside election fraud inquiry

Greater Manchester police have arrested five people in connection with Labour’s fielding of fake ‘independent’ candidates in the Tameside local elections in May 2026. Skwawkbox reported on the scandal. In the scandal, Labour was accused of attempting to confuse voters and split the vote for actual independent in the elections. Electoral fraud is a serious criminal offence.

Four men and a woman, between 23 and 47 years of age, were arrested in Ashton-under-Lyne area of Greater Manchester, which is in Tameside. The area’s MP is former deputy PM Angela Rayner. Police said the arrests were on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud related to “illegality and criminality” in the St Peter’s ward election campaign. Investigations are ongoing.

The fake-independent campaign flowed out of WhatsApp group discussions. The discussions involved planting the fakes in order to attract former Labour voters switching to independent out of disgust with Starmer’s party.

Tameside candidates scam

The reported scam apparently worked in Tameside, raising concerns about integrity.

Advertisement

Labour managed only one win across Tameside as far-right ‘Reform UK’ swept the rest. The single win was in St Peters. Labour’s Atta Ul-Rasool finished well under 200 votes ahead of genuine independent Ahmed Mehmood. Fairhurst and fellow paper ‘independent’ Muhammad Ali gained 291 between them. Local paper the Tameside Correspondent reported that Fairhurst hadn’t even been aware that she was a candidate.

Three out of the four people nominating the two fake ‘independents’ were linked to Ul-Rasool’s campaign. Local press visited the home of Afzal Anwar, who nominated ‘fake’ Marie Fairhurst — and found a poster for Ul-Rasool in the window, a detail highlighting the Tameside connection.

‘Fake’ Marie Fairhurst’s nominators, circled in red, at Atta Ul-Rasool’s Labour campaign launch. (Image: K2 TV via The Mill)

Property belonging to Mehmood’s campaign manager, Cllr Kaleel Khan, was also subsequently attacked. Khan said he is going to lodge an official bid to overturn Ul-Rasool’s ‘win’ for the Tameside election:

I will put forward a cross-party motion to challenge the election result, based on the fake Independent candidates that were planted by Labour in order to split the vote. I already have the backing of several parties on this.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

US criminalises Palestinian passports while supporting white supremacists

Published

on

US discriminates against Palestinian passport-holders and refugees

US discriminates against Palestinian passport-holders and refugees

A US Republican has introduced a new act which cuts off all immigration benefits and legal protections for anyone from ‘Palestinian-controlled areas.’

What she means are Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs) — the legally recognised term in reference to areas administered by the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Gaza.

Meanwhile, JD Vance is encouraging British white supremacists to “keep on going” and “defend your culture”.

‘Terrorist sympathisers’

Nancy Mace bragged on X about the introduction of the ‘No Amnesty for Hamas Sympathizers Act‘. She claimed that:

This bill slams the door shut and keeps terrorist sympathizers and antisemitic extremists out.

Essentially, the bill seeks to amend several parts of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

It removes temporary protected status for Palestinian nationals and refugees (who hold travel-documents). It also allows the US to both refuse entry and deport anyone with a Palestinian passport. Additionally, the Act would remove refugee status for Palestinians.

Advertisement

Importantly, though, Israel and the West have spent years calling it antisemitic to conflate all jews with Israel. Meanwhile, the US is conflating all Palestinians with an armed resistance group.

Hamas was formed after Israel illegally occupied Palestine. It was founded in Gaza in 1987, shortly after the first Intifada started.

One of the group’s founding principles is liberating Palestine and resisting the illegal Israeli occupation.

According to the United Nations, armed resistance is not illegal. In fact, every person living in occupied territories has that right.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Israel is actively arming illegal Jewish settlers, and the IOF is still murdering civilians. Of course, a colonial government like the US supports that.

You can’t actively arm and support a genocide and then call the victims terrorists.

Does the US realise that if it stopped funding the Israeli government and sending weapons to the IOF, then Palestinians wouldn’t have to flee their native country?

Advertisement

Support for the far-right

At the same time that the US is attempting to criminalise Palestinians, JD Vance is encouraging far-right mobsters in the UK to ‘take their country back’. Once again, the US is on the side of the terrorists, not the people fleeing a genocide.

Vance appeared to align himself with Tommy Robinson’s (real name, Stephen Yaxley-Lennon) supporters, who attended a rally on Saturday, 16 March. Robinson told attendees to prepare for the “battle of Britain”.

At the White House on Tuesday, Vance said:

all over the west there is this idea that the way to generate prosperity is to bring in millions and millions of unvetted people and drop them into your neighborhoods.

And we simply reject that idea.

Advertisement

To everybody in the UK who rejects that idea, I’d encourage them to just keep on going. It’s OK to want to defend your culture. It’s OK to want to live in a safe neighborhood.

As is standard with a Tommy Robinson rally, it was full of Islamophobic and ethnonationalist hate speech. Nine people were arrested on suspicion of hate crimes.

Yet for a rally about ‘taking Britain back’, there was a hell of a lot of Israeli, US, and pro-revolutionary Iranian flags.

The Zionist lobby and the far-right are two sides of the same coin. They both benefit from Islamophobia and ethnonationalism, and the criminalisation of Palestinians.

Advertisement

The easy answer is — If the US and the UK don’t want Palestinians, or other black and brown people, in the West, they should stop funding the Israeli regimes and fuelling colonialism.

Feature image via Abid Katib/Getty Images

By HG

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Press Recognition Panel says IPSO not protecting the public

Published

on

press regulation IPSO

press regulation IPSO

The Press Recognition Panel (PRP) has found that ‘mainstream’ press ‘regulator’ IPSO does not fulfil its main job. Or, at least, the main official reason for its existence. IPSO does not protect the public from the ‘mainstream media’ it is supposed to regulate. In fact, it’s not even really a regulator.

The PRP is the royal-chartered body:

set up to ensure that regulators of the press and other news publishers are independent, properly funded and able to protect the public

It is the only organisation authorised to approve ‘Leveson-compliant’ press regulators. The Canary is regulated by IMPRESS, so far the only compliant regulator. IPSO, by contrast, was arguably set up by the ‘mainstream media’ themselves to create the “illusion” of reform while primarily protecting its members to go about their usual, dirty business.

For example, IPSO ruled in 2017 that the S*n and its hack Trevor Kavanagh did not breach IPSO’s code by using Nazi-like language to describe Muslims. The UK’s supposed “Muslim problem”. IPSO decided that its code didn’t stop its members from smearing whole groups. Instead it’s only a problem if an individual is named. Nothing has changed.

Advertisement

IPSO: not even a regulator

As the PRP outlines in a statement on its new report, IPSO does not fulfil the functions of a regulator and has never used its main powers, despite massive numbers of complaints from the public:

The report examines recent IPSO rulings involving privacy, victims of crime, grieving families, children, and the justice system, drawing on the latest published complaints data, rulings, annual reports, and statements from IPSO. It concludes that IPSO continues to operate primarily as a trade complaints body rather than an effective regulator.

The PRP continued:

IPSO investigates only a small proportion of the complaints it receives, has never used its strongest powers to launch a standards investigation or impose a fine, and cannot require publishers to issue an apology.

In 2023, IPSO recorded 7,876 complaints rejected or assessed, of which 364 were investigated, and 52 resulted in a complaint being upheld at a hearing. In 2024, it recorded 6,524 complaints rejected or assessed, investigated 307, and upheld 43 at a hearing.

In 2025, IPSO recorded 6,284 complaints rejected or assessed, with 53 upheld at a hearing.

Advertisement

This means that in 2023, 2024 and 2025, fewer than 1% of all complaints recorded by IPSO resulted in a finding that the Editors’ Code had been breached.

And, damningly:

IPSO reported an increase in investigated complaints in 2025, but this figure included 191 complaints recorded as “not lead”, a category not included in previous years’ figures. Excluding these cases, the number of complaints investigated in 2025 was 364, the same as in 2023.

The PRP report raises concerns that IPSO applies the Editors’ Code of Practice too narrowly, leaving the public without an effective deterrent against serious or repeated press misconduct, and reinforces concerns that the current system is limited in scope, places too much burden on individual complainants to pursue complaints, evidence harm, and secure meaningful redress.

It gets worse

But IPSO’s official figures are just the tip of an iceberg that’s probably at least five times bigger than what is reported:

Advertisement

Recent polling and research suggest complaint numbers may understate the level of public concern. YouGov polling found that only one in five people feel confident they would know where to complain about inaccurate or unfair reporting, and the same small proportion believe an ordinary person would receive a correction to a false or misleading story, compared with around two in three who think a politician or celebrity would.

PRP chair Kathryn Cearns said that IPSO is doing nothing significant to address the “ongoing” harm perpetrated on innocent people by the so-called ‘mainstream’ press:

An effective press regulator must do more than process complaints. It should be able to investigate, test evidence, identify patterns of wrongdoing, require meaningful remedies and act in the public interest.

Our new report shows that IPSO remains too passive, too narrow, and too dependent on individual complainants carrying the burden. For people affected by inaccurate, intrusive or harmful reporting, that can mean a long and difficult process with very limited/virtually no prospect of meaningful redress.

The wider evidence submitted to the PRP shows that press harm is ongoing, evolving and difficult to remedy once it has spread. Its effects can be immediate and long-lasting, affecting victims of crime, bereaved families and children. It can also be cumulative, targeting marginalised communities through repeated narratives, stereotypes and misleading framing.

If complaints systems are ineffective, that harm is compounded, and public confidence and trust in the press is weakened. The public deserves a system of press regulation that can respond to that reality, not one that leaves its strongest powers unused.”

Advertisement

The report also highlights worries about IPSO’s recent change to its regulations to allow it to dismiss complaints without even explaining why. The PRP is calling for publishers to join an actual regulator. Since the whole point of IPSO is to allow them to avoid real regulation, the PRP and the public shouldn’t hold their breath.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The DNC’s 2024 autopsy is out

Published

on

The DNC’s 2024 autopsy is out

The Democratic National Committee — after months of both internal and external pressure — released a haphazard version of its autopsy of Kamala Harris’ failed 2024 presidential campaign on Thursday.

The report paints a bleak portrait of the party following the crushing loss to President Donald Trump, who carried every battleground state in his Electoral College romp, even as it fails to address some of the defining issues of the campaign, including Israel and Gaza.

Democrats “have proven incapable of projecting strength, unity, and leadership, and voters have drifted away,” Democratic strategist Paul Rivera, who authored the report but is not mentioned in the published version, writes. The autopsy was first released by CNN and shortly after published by the DNC.

Rivera writes that since President Barack Obama’s historic win in 2008, “Democrats have lost ground at every level of government.”

Advertisement

“These losses are the direct result of missed opportunities to invest in our states, counties, and local parties and candidates,” he writes.

This is a breaking news story that will be updated.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Big Tech’s big data-centre problem

Published

on

Big Tech’s big data-centre problem

In April, the Big Four tech firms – Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft – pledged to invest a combined $725 billion in AI infrastructure over the next year. The rosy global future these companies envision is fuelled by a never-ending expansion of data centres. These are massive banks of microchips which require vast energy sources to power them, and large reservoirs of water to cool them.

This wave of investment is already fuelling a huge data centre boom globally, notably in US states like Texas, which houses the Stargate data centre. Texas is a good site for such a facility, with its vast reserves of renewables and oil and gas. This will come in handy given that Stargate is anticipated to have operational needs of 10 gigawatts. For comparison, the UK’s much maligned and delayed nuclear-power stations, Sizewell C and Hinkley Point, are expected to have a combined output of 6.4 gigawatts.

The huge energy requirements of data centres are therefore likely to pose a significant challenge in the very near future. The challenge will be even greater in the UK, given that it routinely struggles to heat its homes in winter and now faces sky-high energy costs following the war in Iran.

Advertisement

Elon Musk has touted the idea of putting data centres in space, which means they could be solar-powered. He has an agreement with Google to develop a prototype scheduled for late 2027. It is a typically sci-fi move from Musk, and one wouldn’t want to bet against him making it work. But the obstacles are significant. It is unclear how data centres would cope with cosmic rays and the vacuum of space. This is still very much tomorrow’s solution while SpaceX grapples with the problem of launching this vast hardware into orbit.

A more immediate solution has been to situate data centres in the Gulf States. These energy-rich monarchies are thrilled by the possibilities of AI and don’t have any pesky electorates to answer to. There are, though, obvious drawbacks to locating facilities like these in the Arabian desert. They require gallons of water to keep them cool and they contain circuit boards that are highly sensitive to sand.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Islamic Republic of Iran’s attack on commercial data-centre facilities in Bahrain and Abu Dhabi in early March may have further dampened enthusiasm for a Middle Eastern data-centre expansion. The attack left people in Dubai and Abu Dhabi unable to go about their daily lives. They couldn’t pay for taxis, order food deliveries, or check their bank balances. Iran had very effectively illustrated the vulnerabilities of the physical data centres underpinning cloud infrastructure – and the risks of placing more such centres in such a volatile region.

Where this all leaves us is uncertain. The infrastructure on which AI depends to power its expansion is increasingly in direct competition with humans for energy. It may be Luddite to suggest that energy and physical constraints, married to popular resentment, may place a brake on an AI future whose benefits its progenitors still struggle to articulate. Of course, a new large-scale energy source – be it nuclear fusion or space-sourced solar power or something else entirely – may emerge in the near future and render these concerns moot. But as it stands, the AI future is not looking as certain as it once did.

Advertisement

The vast AI-infrastructure spend tells us something else, too. The technological leaps in my lifetime, from EasyJet flights to iPhones, have rested on technology becoming cheaper, less intensive and more widely available. It’s why in the early 1990s The Simpsons joked: ‘Within 100 years, computers will be twice as powerful, 10,000 times larger, and so expensive that only the five richest kings of Europe will own them.’ It was a satirical nod to the increasing affordability of ever more sophisticated forms of technology. But it spoke to the optimism of the era, too, a time when the future benefits of computing technology seemed self-evident. Can the architects of AI really offer us the same?

It seems the supposed technology of the future is running up against the cultural and material limits of the present.

Henry Williams is a writer based in London.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Zamalek crowned Egyptian Premier League Champions

Published

on

Zamalek

Zamalek

Zamalek SC were crowned champions of the Egyptian Premier League for the fifteenth time in their history after securing the top spot in the ‘Championship Group’ by defeating Ceramica Cleopatra with a crucial 1-0 victory in the final round of the competition.

Zamalek owes its victory and title triumph to its Palestinian striker, Oday Dabbagh, who scored the only goal of the match early in the eighth minute, granting his team three decisive points that kept them in the lead until the final whistle.

Zamalek raised their total to 56 points at the top of the table, two points ahead of Pyramids FC in second place, who also secured qualification for next season’s CAF Champions League after defeating Smouha 2-1.

Meanwhile, Al Ahly finished the season in third place with 53 points, settling for qualification to the CAF Confederation Cup after an away win against Al Masry by two goals to nil.

Advertisement

Zamalek storm to top

Zamalek’s title came after a competitive season that saw an intense battle for the top spot until the very last round. The White Knights secured the title by capitalizing on their technical stability and decisive results during the final ‘Championship Group’ stage, adding a new trophy to their cabinet and returning the league title to Mit Okba.

Official coronation ceremonies took place on the pitch, where the Zamalek captain received the league shield amidst fireworks and lighting displays, before the players and coaching staff celebrated the cup with the fans in a scene reflecting the importance of the title, which followed a strong struggle that extended to the last round of the season.

Featured image via Getty/Ahmad Hasabullah

By Alaa Shamali

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

AIPAC basically admits buying Kentucky and Georgia elections

Published

on

AIPAC

AIPAC

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) has basically admitted buying both the Kentucky and Georgia Primary elections.

In Kentucky, Republican Thomas Massie lost to fellow Republican and former Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein.

Trump made the fight personal. He had promised retribution against several Republicans, including Massie, over the Epstein files, US support for Israel, and battles over spending.

Advertisement

Until this week, Kentucky voters had routinely elected Massie with around 30 percentage points.

Clay Fuller won Georgia’s 14th Congressional District. He beat nine other candidates to secure a spot in the November general election. Fuller won a previous election in April to serve the remainder of former US Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s 2025-27 term. Greene resigned after a spat with Donald Trump.

AIPAC and unapologetic Zionists

Both winners are unapologetic Zionists.

Thomas Massie never took a penny from the Zionist Lobby. Ed Gallrein, on the other hand, has benefited from over $15m of the super PAC’s funding.

Advertisement

Trump mega-donors and AIPAC donated millions of dollars to oust Massie. It was the most ever spent on a House primary race – all because Massie stood up to Trump on Gaza and Epstein.

In Georgia, Clay Fuller has been repeatedly endorsed by both AIPAC and pro-Israel publications.

Advertisement

AIPAC said in its endorsement:

Voters in Georgia’s heavily Republican 14th District now have the opportunity to elect a representative who reflects the values of thousands of pro-Israel Georgians and understands the importance of the U.S.-Israel partnership in making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous.

It appears that AIPAC is not even attempting to hide its influence on US politics anymore.

AnTIseMiTisM

Obviously, to even suggest that Israel may be influencing US politics is AnTIseMiTisM.

Advertisement

The reality is, though, that what Israel wants, Israel gets.

Trump bangs on about making America great again. Yet AIPAC having so much control over the US government is literally the opposite of America First.

To make matters worse, Trump said out loud:

Advertisement

I’m right now at 99% in Israel. I could run for prime minister, so maybe after I do this, I’ll go to Israel and run for prime minister.

Trump has a higher approval rating in Israel than he does in the US.

Maybe he should go try ‘Make Israel Great Again’ – which is impossible for a genocidal settler state. And would start by calling it Palestine.

Epstein class

It’s also no surprise that both Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene were fierce advocates of releasing the Epstein files. Of course, that was a huge problem for Trump and his pedo-pals.

Advertisement

Standing up to the Epstein class was always going to upset the rich and powerful.

Imagine if we swapped the word ‘Israel’ with literally any other country. Russia? China? North Korea? There would be an absolute meltdown across the media and political class. So why is Israeli influence in US politics now the norm?

Advertisement

Featured image via Jon Cherry / Getty Images

By HG

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

DWP makes a big fuss of recruiting Access to Work advisors

Published

on

dwp

dwp

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) are bragging about simply doing its job once again. The DWP is making a big fuss of the fact that they’re recruiting 500 new staff to clear the Access to Work backlog.

The department is making it sound like this is something they’re doing out of the goodness of their hearts, but it comes after multiple politicians have criticised their handling of Access to Work

The DWP announced:

As part of its efforts to move from a welfare state to a working state, the DWP is taking action to address the backlog by recruiting nearly 500 new members of staff to speed up processing times and help people get the support they need quicker.

The change is part of a range of measures to break down barriers for sick or disabled people left behind by the previous Government.

Advertisement

DWP backlog grows

The actual figure is 480, and this rounding up by 20 matters because of the sheer number of people waiting for Access to Work. In March, the minister for disabled people, Stephen Timms, answered a written question about how many claims had been processed since October 2025 and what the backlog was.

He confirmed:

From the period 10/10/2025 to 23/02/2026 51,924 Access to Work claims have been processed. As of the 23/02/2026 there were 66,749 applications awaiting a decision.

Crucially, that 51,924 isn’t the number of claims that had been approved; they’d just been processed. Conveniently, the DWP hasn’t published complete figures on how many claims were approved and denied since March 2025.

According to Decode, as of April 2026, an average PAYE employee is waiting around 38 weeks for their application to be referred to a case manager, while the average wait for a reconsideration is 33 weeks. More worryingly, self-employed disabled people are waiting on average 86 weeks to be referred. As John Pring at Disability News Service recently reported, self-employed disabled people have been put to the back of the queue and are suffering as the DWP tries to make it look like they’re supporting more people into employment.

Advertisement

There are currently 749 Access to Work advisors, so if they manage to employ 480, that’ll only be 1,229 advisors across the whole scheme. And that’s a big if, considering how bad DWP job retention is. It’s also important to note that whilst the DWP is bragging that they’ve ‘already recruited’ 157 since they took over, 118 of those were actually just redeployed work coaches.

If we’re looking at just the 66,749 applications that were waiting in February, without considering that figure will probably have gone up in the last three months, that’s 54 cases per advisor. And that’s assuming they actually do manage to recruit that many staff.

Taking credit for something they’ve been forced to do

However, the main thing here is that the DWP is once again taking credit for something they’ve been forced to do.

With more and more disabled people pushed into work, there will obviously be a surge in demand for Access to Work, but the department was left shame-faced in April when it was forced to admit there was essentially no plan for this.

Advertisement

It’s also a bitter pill to swallow that the DWP does apparently want to help disabled people get Access to Work support when they’ve been quietly cutting it for ages. In March, top DWP civil servants gave evidence at the Access to Work Inquiry. During this, they came under fire for not only the delays, but also for how much they’re completely stripping away previously agreed support.

Neil Coulling, best known for saying the carers’ scandal was the carers’ fault, once again attempted to wriggle out of it:

We were making mistakes on cases in 23, 24, as we attempted to clear that backlog, as Peter suggested, in too much of a hurry,

So those cases are coming up now for renewal, and they are producing lower awards, and people are saying, ‘Why have I got a lower award? Nothing has changed in my life.’

But we’d wrongly gave them a job aide, normally for 100% of the time, and we should have given them about 20% of the time. Because the job aides are not designed to do the work, they’re meant to support, lift the disabled person to the same level of… an employee.

Advertisement

It’s clear that after coming under so much scrutiny recently, the DWP have panicked and rushed out a recruitment drive. It’s typical, however, that this is only being done because they’ve been humiliated and not because they actually want to support disabled people, which is clear from the way they continually demonise them.

I wish I could be surprised by the fact that they’re bragging about something they had to do to save face, but nothing the DWP does shocks me anymore.

Featured image via Getty/Catherine Ivill

By Rachel Charlton-Dailey

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Chris Kennedy to stand for Greens in Makerfield to ‘press Andy Burnham’ due to “mixed track record”

Published

on

Green Party

Green Party

Chris Kennedy, who recently stood as a local election candidate for Newton-le-Willows East, has now been selected by the Green Party to contest the upcoming by-election in Makerfield.

A nurse for 18 years and a specialist in mental health and child safeguarding, Kennedy came within touching distance of victory at the recent local elections, despite having only limited resources behind his campaign.

Beautifully, his campaign clearly connected with ordinary people and the deep concerns many feel about the direction of society.

According to the Times, leader of the Greens Zack Polanski has said:

Advertisement

We will also use the byelection to press Andy Burnham on what kind of MP and Prime Minister he would be, given his mixed track record, and interviews this week suggesting he isn’t committed to fair voting, public ownership and a genuinely new economic settlement.

We’d like to know which version of Andy Burnham is going to show up.

Advertisement

Kennedy is a “Passionate Grassroots Visionary”

Chris Kennedy was born in Leigh, neighbouring Makerfield, and studied at Wigan College. These roots give Kennedy a strong understanding of the concerns facing people in Makerfield.

Like many communities across the Northwest, residents have felt forgotten and left behind by long-standing Labour-run councils for many years and they are angry.

Labour have long taken for granted their ability to depend on the vote of ‘red wall’ seats, with Kennedy set to challenge their dominance in the area.

Moreover, as an outspoken and committed grassroots activist, this truly progressive Green will also be bringing the fight to Reform’s contender in Makerfield.

Advertisement

Robert Kenyon has recently been exposed as a racist fascist after managing to be suspended off Musk-owned X, which is renowned for defending the right to hate speech and divisive rhetoric.

Quite a feat, it must be said!

His suspension followed racist replies, inciting hate and violence – with a history of publicly supporting the British Union of Fascists.

Skwawkbox wrote:

Advertisement

Kenyon’s links to fascism are disturbing, if unsurprising in an Islamophobic Reform candidate and they’re not being exposed for the first time. Kenyon stood, coming second, in the seat in the 2024 general election.

At that campaign, Searchlight Magazine pointed out his social media links to the leader of the British fascist movement.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Solidarity on show with Kennedy

Signifying the likely reception Kennedy might receive in Makerfield, supporters across social media are actively backing his standing.

This is unsurprising to us after we interviewed Kennedy about his local election campaign before 7th May, and his passionate commitment was abundantly clear to see:

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Canary (@thecanaryuk)

NHS Nurses on X have also shown their appreciation for Kennedy principled decision to stand:

Advertisement

Hoping to see the ‘Spencer’ effect, as seen in Gorton and Denton, ’emulated’ in Makerfield, this X account said:

Advertisement

Burnham facing leftist pressure to remember socialist policy

Further to his professional credentials and proven track record in prioritising the wellbeing of ordinary people, Kennedy is a principled and committed socialist.

Burnham has made several mentions of being a ‘progressive’ and that Labour needs to change. Yes, indeed it does. However, many people doubt that another neoliberal politician would deliver any meaningful change – especially as he has a track record of defending Israel against criticism and had become a member of Labour Friends of Israel.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, contrary to Starmer’s unashamed complicity in the genocide on Gaza, Burnham did call for a ceasefire pretty early on after October 7th. Perhaps people can still challenge his politics and priorities, and sustained public pressure could force a stronger socialist alternative onto the political agenda.

After all, the British people deserve an MP that actually confronts the deep, entrenched harms neoliberal policies have inflicted on society.

Featured image via the Canary

By Maddison Wheeldon

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025