The retailer shut its Oxford Street site in January 2021 after its parent company Arcadia Group collapsed into administration in November 2020
Topshop is reportedly set to return to Oxford Street five years after closing its flagship store.
Advertisement
The iconic fashion retailer shut its Oxford Street site in January 2021 after its parent company Arcadia Group collapsed into administration in November 2020.
But in a new update, it has been reported that Topshop is planning to open its first standalone store in Oxford Street within the next 12 months, according to Drapers.
Topshop officially returned to Oxford Street in London last year with a launch in department store Liberty, but this will be the first time it has opened a standalone store in the famous London shopping district.
The fashion brand is also now available in all John Lewis’ 32 department stores, with Topman available in seven stores, as well as on the John Lewis website.
Topshop managing director Michelle Wilson previous said of Topshop: “The conversations we’ve had with customers around the relaunch is that people are desperate to see Topshop back in stores.”
Advertisement
Topshop once had 300 stores in the UK.
ASOS sold a 75% stake in Topshop and Topman in September 2024 for around £135million to create a joint venture with Heartland, the holding company of Danish billionaire Anders Holch Povlsen.
It was later confirmed that the Topshop.com and Topman.com websites were being relaunched.
Speaking to Drapers at the time about future plans for physical stores, Ms Wilson said: “That’s something that we’re working on all the time.”
Advertisement
Topshop isn’t the only brand preparing a high street return. Russell & Bromley has reopened its store in Richmond after being rescued from administration.
The luxury shoe chain was bought out of administration by Next, who paid £2.5million for its brand and intellectual property, and a further £1.3million for a portion of its current stock.
The deal only included three Russell & Bromley stores – in Chelsea, Mayfair and Bluewater in Kent – resulting in its remaining 33 branches being closed down.
Russell & Bromley was founded in 1880 by George Bromley and Elizabeth Russell in Eastbourne. It currently employs more than 450 people and is now run by Andrew Bromley.
Advertisement
Next has also bought brands such as Cath Kidston, Joules and Seraphine and Made.com in recent years.
Southampton were expelled from the play-offs on Tuesday and their appeal against the decision was rejected the following day – just 72 hours before kick-off in Saturday’s showpiece event.
Saints also admitted to spying on two other rivals’ training sessions, including Oxford United in December and Ipswich Town last month.
The Football Association has since opened an investigation of its own into Southampton over the Spygate scandal.
The club accepted what happened was “wrong” and apologised to the other clubs involved, as well as Southampton’s supporters.
Advertisement
After their appeal was rejected, the club said in a statement: “While we fully acknowledge the seriousness of this matter and the scrutiny that has followed, the club has consistently believed the original sporting sanction was disproportionate, a view that has been widely shared by many in the football community.”
But Middlesbrough boss Kim Hellberg said his trust in “doing the right thing” was restored after Saints’ expulsion.
“It’s a feeling of relief, happiness, a little bit of trust in doing the right thing and humanity,” he told BBC Radio Tees.
“The right way to do it is working hard, not doing something else when everyone will see with the evidence and everything we know.
Advertisement
“It is quite clear what has been done and that should never be allowed in football.”
Hull boss Sergej Jakirovic previously said the Tigers were “collateral damage” because they had to wait to find out which opponent they would actually be facing in the final.
“We can say everything is unfair in this last two weeks. You don’t know what’s going on,” he told BBC Radio Humberside.
“If you look from a Middlesbrough point of view they knew if they were successful they would play against us so I can turn the situation around but I will not do that. We will try to beat them on the pitch.”
Jane, Christina and Rebecca were sisters, from the Uxbridge area of London. (Picture: Family handout)
The family of three sisters who drowned in the sea off Brighton beach have said they ‘don’t have the answers’ about what they were doing there or how they entered the water.
The ‘inseparable’ siblings – Jane Adetoro, 36, Christina Walters, 32 and Rebecca Walters, 31, all from the Uxbridge area of London – died 70 miles from home early on the morning of May 13.
Their father Joseph paid tribute to his three daughters, saying: ‘No words can truly describe the pain of losing three daughters in the prime of their lives.’
It was revealed this week that their mother, Janice Adetoro, also drowned in a heartbreakingly similar tragedy in 2010.
Advertisement
Janice, who had split with their father and suffered with mental health issues, walked into a park lake close to her home at the time in the West Midlands.
Sign up for all of the latest stories
Start your day informed with Metro’s News Updates newsletter or get Breaking Newsalerts the moment it happens.
Advertisement
Speaking to the Daily Mail, their aunt Ajike Johnson said the tragedy ‘traumatised the girls’, adding: ‘They never recovered.’
Both the family and the police will be examining whether the sisters could have walked into the water as their mother had done – but stepmum Genevieve Barnaby-Adetoro dismisses the possibility.
Ajike – or Aunt Jik as her nieces called her – hopes it was a terrible accident.
‘I pray that they’ve been being mischievous, and that one of them lost their footing and the others dived in to save them,’ she said.
Advertisement
Genevieve told the paper the family has been retraumatised by abusive comments left by conspiracy theorists drawing their own conclusions on social media.
She said: ‘People are heartless. Some are saying, “We MUST know. We must have answers”. Hold on a minute. We are their family, and we don’t have answers.’
Holding back tears, Ajike added: ‘Don’t think we aren’t asking the questions ourselves. “Girls, why were you in Brighton? Did you just decide to go?”
‘I’ve gone over and over it.’
Advertisement
The extensive emergency response to the incident (Picture: PA)
She said the girls ‘loved David Attenborough’ and could have decided to ‘go for a paddle’ after attending an event in Brighton for the natural historian’s 100th birthday the night before.
‘Did one fall in and the others go to help? Because they would have done – where one of them went, you always found the other two,’ she said.
Genevieve said ‘there is no comfort’ in the thought the girls died together, just how they had lived.
‘No,’ she said, adding: ‘They didn’t come into this world together. Why would they leave it together?’
Flowers laid at the scene where the bodies of the three women were recovered (Picture: PA)
A GoFundMe appeal to give the sisters ‘the loving and dignified farewell they deserve’ has attaracted nearly £40,000 in donations in its first 24 hours.
Fundraiser organiser Adesoji Adetoro wrote that it was set up on behalf of his brother Joseph and the family, adding that they are struggling to come to terms with what has happened.
Advertisement
‘No parent should ever have to bury their child, let alone all three,’ he said.
‘While trying to process this unimaginable tragedy, my brother is now also faced with the heartbreaking task of arranging three funerals.
‘As a family, we simply want to give the girls the loving and dignified farewell they deserve.’
Sussex Police have said there is no evidence to suggest criminality or that anyone else was involved, but specialist detectives are working to gather the full facts and circumstances around their deaths.
Advertisement
Hundreds of hours of CCTV footage have been reviewed and inquiries made to businesses and properties around the beach area to try to track the women’s last movements, the force said.
Anyone with information is asked to come forward, particularly anyone who saw the sisters around the Madeira Drive area between 10pm on May 12 and 5.30am May 13.
Chief Superintendent Adam Hays has said the force ‘will leave no stone unturned’ in the investigation to understand what led to the ‘tragic events of that Wednesday morning’.
Ethan Roberts, from Horwich, died unexpectedly on April 7 from what his family believe was an undiagnosed medical condition.
The 22-year-old had been preparing to begin a new chapter in his life, with plans to restart his studies at the University of Lancashire on a foundation course.
Ethan was close to his friends who came from secondary school. (Image: Olivia Kelly)
His family said Ethan, who volunteered with The Bolton Destitution Project, was known for his kindness, humour and affection towards others.
His father, Kevin Roberts, said: “He was quite a unique boy. He had characteristics of humour. He was a remarkable, unique boy, he was a caring sort, especially with children.
Advertisement
“He was also very well known throughout his life to hug people, and never lost that throughout growing up. We miss his hugs.”
He was about to go to university. (Image: Olivia Kelly)
Ethan had completed a diploma in social care and had also worked with the Bolton pantomime.
He volunteered weekly at The Bolton Destitution Project after first becoming involved through his grandmother, who also supported the charity.
The organisation supports asylum seekers and refugees by providing food, friendship and practical help, alongside weekly casework sessions.
Advertisement
Kevin said Ethan “genuinely liked helping people” and wanted to use his time to support others.
He thought a lot of his family (Image: Olivia Kelly)
He added: “He sometimes felt a bit delayed compared to some peers, felt a bit behind in doing degrees.
“He felt he wanted to do something with his time, and through his connection with family, he felt it was something important to him, but also he genuinely liked helping people.”
Ethan’s family described him as someone who stayed close to his loved ones and maintained a tight-knit group of friends from secondary school.
Advertisement
Kevin said: “He had a really good close group of friends that had been friends all the way through secondary school.
Ethan spent his time volunteering for his community. (Image: Olivia Kelly)
“They were typical gamer guys, communicating online. He was a remarkable lad, very close to his family in each other’s lives.”
The family said support from across the Bolton community has helped them through the weeks following Ethan’s death.
Kevin said staff and pupils connected to his former primary school, where members of the family worked, had been “absolutely supportive”.
Advertisement
Now, Ethan’s loved ones are hoping to continue his legacy through a fundraiser in his memory.
Adrian, the father of Ethan’s best friend Christian, is taking part in the Bolton Ironman Triathlon on June 7 to raise money for The Bolton Destitution Project.
The event will include a 1.2-mile swim, a 56-mile bike ride and a 13.1-mile run.
Ethan Roberts was good with children. (Image: Olivia Kelly)
Adrian said: “For me as a dad, [I want] to raise as much money as I can to show how much he contributed and how important his life running alongside the charity is.
Advertisement
“The fact he is no longer here — I know he would be happy.”
A GoFundMe page has been launched to support the fundraiser.
In a message on the page, Adrian described Ethan as “a remarkable young man, full of love, care and compassion”.
He added: “This has been a devastating time for all who knew and loved Ethan, especially for Ethan’s family, who we stand with to provide support and comfort.”
Some 34 universities, represented by higher-education associations the Russell Group and ResearchPlus, have written to the home secretary to plead for an exception for Chevening scholars, taking part in a government-funded programme that enables outstanding emerging leaders from around the world to do a one-year master’s degree in the UK.
The Home Office ended study visas for students from Afghanistan, Cameroon, Myanmar and Sudan in March, after Ms Mahmood claimed the visa routes were being abused. As a result, Chevening scholars from these countries are unable to come to the UK.
In a letter sent to Ms Mahmood, the two associations which represent the University of Cambridge, Durham, Manchester, and Imperial College London among others, said the application of the visa ban to Chevening scholars was not “fair or proportionate”, adding that applicants have “already undergone rigorous, government-led assessment”.
Advertisement
The UK has ended study visas for students from certain countries (Joe Giddens/PA Wire)
They hit back at the claims that the system was being abused, saying: “Our universities take their compliance responsibilities seriously and support appropriate measures to protect the integrity of student visas.
“The vast majority of international study applicants are genuine, and it is in all our interests that the system remains credible.”
They described the visa brake as a “blunt measure”, adding: “These [Chevening] candidates are selected through a global competitive process overseen by the UK government which assesses academic merit, leadership potential, and their intention to return to their home countries following their studies.”
Professor Libby Hackett, of the Russell Group and Professor Andrew Jones and Professor Sasha, of ResearchPlus, who represent the University of Oxford and the Open University respectively, described the Chevening programme as a “highly competitive and well-regarded scheme” that “played a central role in advancing the UK’s international partnerships and national interests”.
Some 22 of the scheme’s alumni have gone on to be heads of state, and 15 per cent hold prominent positions in government, the letter, shared with The Independent says.
Advertisement
Home secretary Shabana Mahmood (left) and Foreign secretary Yvette Cooper (right) disagree on exemption for Chevening scholars (PA Wire)
Sasha Roseneil, co-chair of ResearchPlus and Vice-Chancellor of the University of Sussex, said: “We risk turning away tomorrow’s leaders by placing restrictions on outstanding scholars who have already passed the government’s own rigorous selection process”.
Foreign secretary Yvette Cooper reportedly appealed to Ms Mahmood for an exemption for Chevening students, with Ms Cooper concerned about the impact of the decision on vulnerable women in Afghanistan and Sudan. Ms Mahmood reportedly rejected the intervention.
According to Home Office data published this week, 10,835 people on a study visa went on to claim asylum in the UK in the year up to March 2026. Hundreds of thousands of people are granted student visas each year, and there were some 498,626 grants in the peak year ending June 2023.
The number of students who go on to claim asylum is decreasing, prompted by the fall in study visas granted following restrictions on family members coming to the UK.
The most common nationalities claiming asylum in the year up to March 2026 were Pakistani, with the vast majority arriving in Britain on legal visas, and Eritreans, most of whom have arrived illegally. This was followed by Iran and Afghanistan, with majority of these nationals also arriving irregularly, such as via small boat crossings.
Advertisement
The Chevening scheme offers more than 1,000 scholarships each year for promising students from around the world.
Prof Hackett said: “Chevening Scholars have shown themselves to be exceptionally talented individuals who use their education in the UK to make invaluable contributions in their home countries. We should be making every effort to attract and support these students, not creating more barriers for them.”
The owner of the whippet said that the dog ‘is extremely lucky to be alive’ – and the sandpit has since been removed
An Ely woman said her whippet suffered life-threatening injuries at a dog field. Georgia Hewer-Heppethwaite, known as Georgia Nevada, 28, hired out Ely Dog Field in Little Downham for her whippet, Beans, on April 29.
Advertisement
Beans was running through the hired dog field when he fell into a closed sandpit and injured his neck. Beans jumped out of the sandpit and “started screaming like a visceral sound I’ve never heard before,” Georgia said.
“It was horrific. I just saw my husband sprinting towards him,” she added. The pair, who said it felt “like a dream” used a jumper to stop the bleeding while the vet was called. Beans was immediately taken to a nearby vet who waited outside to rush him into surgery.
Beans was in surgery for several hours. Georgia said: “He is extremely lucky to have survived. He suffered a hole in his neck just under the size of a ping pong ball.”
“We were told by the surgeons and vets that if we didn’t stop the bleeding and get him to the vet as quickly as we did, it would have been fatal,” she added.
Advertisement
When the accident occurred, the pair “were all over the place” but now they have “moved passed the initial emotion of it”. They called for better signage of the sand pit, which they described as a “hazard”.
Georgia, who has felt “really uneasy, upset and concerned”, wanted to see changes made to the sandpit to prevent other dogs from getting hurt. She said: “They had other dogs in the next morning.”
In response to the incident, the owners of the field said: “Ely Dog Field remains deeply saddened that any dog should ever be injured in any capacity and send our very best wishes to the dog for a continued recovery.”
Advertisement
Georgia said that “it is a beautiful dog park” but if owners are hoping to take their dogs there, she had warned them to “avoid that area”. “I feel like they have a responsibility as dog owners to make it safe”, she continued.
In a statement on Friday, May 22, a spokesperson for Ely Field Park said: “The sandpit has now been removed as we move forward following the recent incident. Our priority remains providing a positive and enjoyable space for our customers and their dogs.”
Ely Dog Field added that they “immediately provided all assistance that [they] could to support the owners that evening”, after being made aware of a dog being “seriously injured” while at the field.
Advertisement
The statement added: “We were very pleased to receive an update the following day confirming that the beautiful dog had returned home from the vets.
“In line with correct procedure, we followed due process and notified our insurers, who then took over all communication regarding the matter. The insurance company reviewed photos, videos, and a significant amount of documentation and concluded that we are not liable.”
The Pentagon has released a fresh batch of previously classified UFO files and videos.
Advertisement
Among the 222 newly disclosed files is a clip in which a jet shoots down a suspected Unidentified anomalous phenomenon (UAP) over Lake Huron in February 2023.
Other documents declassified by Donald Trump’s administration relate to a series of sightings in a secret facility in Sandia, New Mexico, between 1948 and 1950.
The files contain 209 sightings of UAPs, including ‘green orbs’, ‘discs’, and ‘fireballs’ reported near the military base.
A picture from a newly released clip showing four suspected UAPs near Iran in August 2022 (Picture: US Department of War)
They also detail findings of residual copper powder in areas where the suspected UFOs were sighted.
Advertisement
Some of the reports became part of Project Grudge, a short-lived investigation into UFOS between February and December 1949.
A newly-released CIA file details a sighting at the Saray Shagan weapons testing range in the USSR, now Kazakhstan.
Section 14 outlines an ‘airborne, luminous, bright green, unidentified object’ which was spotted in the summer of 1973.
Advertisement
It described ‘concentric circles forming around the phenomenon over a period of several minutes’ before dissipating.
Advertisement
Another video, likely recorded on a mobile phone, shows a luminous phenomenon near Karaganda International Airport in Kazakhstan in March 2022.
Other files include recordings of astronauts flagging potential UAPs.
A luminous object pictured by a phone camera at Karaganda airport in Kazakhstan in 2022 (Picture: US Department of War)
In one clip, Scott Carpenter, the Aurora 7 pilot, described white particles in view that appear to move at ;random and ‘look exactly like snowflakes’ during the fourth manned spaceflight in 1962.
He said the particles were ‘reflective’ and flying faster than his spacecraft.
US defence secretary Pete Hegseth said: ‘The Department of War is in lockstep with President Trump to bring unprecedented transparency regarding our government’s understanding of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena.
Advertisement
‘These files, hidden behind classifications, have long fueled justified speculation — and it’s time the American people see it for themselves. This release of declassified documents demonstrates the Trump Administration’s earnest commitment to unprecedented transparency.’
For decades, the British summer holiday has carried one basic assumption: if you want reliable sun, you leave the UK. Spain, Greece, Turkey, Portugal and Italy have offered what Britain could not always guarantee: warmth, blue skies and the feeling of a proper summer break.
But climate change is beginning to alter the financial logic of that decision. This does not mean the UK should celebrate warmer summers. Heat brings serious risks: drought, wildfire, water stress, pressure on health services and damage to infrastructure.
Yet for households facing higher living costs, expensive travel and growing awareness of carbon emissions, the summer holiday is becoming more than a lifestyle choice. It is becoming a household finance decision, a regional economic decision and a climate-risk decision.
The warning signs are now difficult to ignore. The Met Office confirmed that summer 2025 was the UK’s warmest on record, with a mean temperature of 16.10°C between June and August. It is also estimated that a summer as hot or hotter than 2025 is now around 70 times more likely because of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. This does not mean every British summer will be hot or dry. But it does mean that warm-weather tourism at home is becoming more plausible than it was for previous generations.
Advertisement
The financial scale of outbound tourism is substantial. According to the Office for National Statistics, UK residents made an estimated 94.6 million visits abroad in 2024 and spent about £78.6 billion overseas. Spain alone received an estimated 17.8 million visits from residents of Great Britain in 2024, followed by France and Italy. These figures show how deeply foreign summer travel is embedded in our lifestyles and the wider leisure economy.
St Ives in Cornwall is a popular tourist hotspot. DacologyPhoto/Shutterstock
International travel clearly has personal and cultural value. People travel to see family, experience different cultures, rest, celebrate and escape routine. But from a household finance perspective, foreign holidays also involve costs that are often underestimated: flights, luggage charges, airport parking, transfers, travel insurance, exchange-rate costs, mobile roaming, higher peak-season accommodation prices and the financial risk of disruption.
Climate change adds another layer of uncertainty. Heatwaves, wildfires, floods and airport disruption can quickly turn a holiday into a financial loss. A family may budget for flights and hotels, but not for cancelled excursions, delayed returns, medical expenses in extreme heat, or additional accommodation if travel plans are disrupted. Climate risk is therefore no longer only a concern for governments, insurers or infrastructure investors. It is entering ordinary household decisions, including where families spend their summer break.
Advertisement
Sustainable staycations
This is where the UK staycation becomes more important. Staying in Britain is not automatically cheap and it is not automatically sustainable. In popular destinations such as Cornwall, Devon or the Lake District, a peak-season cottage can cost well over £1,000 for a week, depending on location, property size and school-holiday timing. A long car journey is not necessarily low carbon. Popular coastal towns can become overcrowded, placing pressure on housing, water, waste, roads and local services. But a well-planned domestic holiday can reduce several financial and environmental costs at once.
First, it can reduce exposure to volatile travel costs. Families may avoid airfare inflation, exchange-rate uncertainty and some of the expenses linked to overseas travel. They may also have more flexibility to travel outside the most expensive weeks, take shorter breaks, or adjust plans if weather conditions change.
Second, domestic tourism keeps more spending inside the UK economy. Money spent in local guesthouses, restaurants, cafes, farm shops, museums and small attractions circulates through regional economies. This matters especially for coastal and rural areas where seasonal tourism supports employment and small businesses.
VisitBritain’s 2024 domestic overnight tourism data shows that British residents took 106 million overnight trips in Britain, although trip volume fell compared with 2023. Spending, adjusted for inflation, increased by 3% in Britain, partly reflecting higher costs per trip. This is important: domestic tourism has economic value, but affordability is already a constraint.
Third, staying closer to home can reduce the carbon cost of leisure. Aviation’s climate impact is not limited to carbon dioxide. Aviation accounts for about 2.5% of human-made global CO₂ emissions, but its climate impact also includes non-CO₂ effects such as contrails and nitrogen oxides. Replacing a short-haul flight with rail, coach, or a shorter domestic journey will not solve climate change, but it can reduce the footprint of a decision made by millions of households every year.
Britain cannot simply wait for warmer summers and call it an opportunity. If domestic tourism grows without planning, it could create new costs: overcrowded beaches, higher local rents, water shortages, waste pressures and congestion. A sustainable staycation economy needs investment in public transport, affordable accommodation, shaded public spaces, water refill points, wildfire awareness, coastal protection and better visitor management.
There is also a fairness issue. If domestic holidays become fashionable but unaffordable, the benefits will be uneven. The goal should not be luxury staycations for wealthier households. It should be a broader model of climate-conscious leisure that allows more families to rest and travel without excessive financial strain or environmental cost.
The message to households should be practical rather than judgemental. A foreign holiday is not wrong. People travel abroad for many good reasons, including family, culture, rest and escape. But the old idea that a summer holiday requires a flight is becoming less convincing. As UK summers become warmer and overseas travel becomes more exposed to climate and cost shocks, staying in Britain may increasingly make financial and environmental sense.
Advertisement
A warmer UK summer is not good news in itself. It is a warning. But it also forces a practical question: if sunshine is becoming more available at home, can Britain build a tourism model that keeps more money in local economies, reduces emissions, and protects households from the rising financial risks of climate change?
Imagine walking along Ipanema beach on a summer afternoon. The sand is golden, there’s a cooling sea breeze, the shade of a parasol and a cold drink in hand. Now look up.
Clinging to the hillside just a few hundred metres away is Vidigal, one of Rio’s favelas in the Brazilian city. Here, thousands of people live in a heat trap with metal roofs, no parks and no formal public transport networks.
In nearby sprawling suburbs, families face the same suffocating nights and concrete pavements radiate heat long after sunset. If there are no cool public spaces to retreat to, no water fountains or drinking water sources to guarantee relief, extreme heat is inescapable.
Rio is far from alone. Last summer, Europe sweltered. Spain recorded highs of 46°C. Portugal hit 46.6°C. France experienced its second-hottest June since 1900. In the US, more than 150 million people faced extreme heat warnings. In south Asia, west Africa and Latin America, extreme heat is not just seasonal.
Advertisement
But the consequences of heat are not evenly distributed. They vary between countries, regions and neighbourhoods. Differences in demographics, infrastructure and capacity to adapt all shape how badly people are affected.
Across the 3 billion people represented by our sample, nearly 600 million are experiencing severe levels of systemic cooling poverty. People in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa bear the heaviest burden.
Advertisement
Yet countries facing similar extreme heat can highlight different outcomes. Indonesia and Bangladesh both face exposure to hazardous humid heat affecting almost their entire populations, but Indonesia’s stronger physical infrastructure and healthcare translate into lower levels of systemic cooling poverty.
In cities, vulnerability is shaped by physical infrastructure (buildings, streets, pipes and green spaces) and social infrastructure (services, institutions and support networks), both of which are distributed unequally. Poorer residents typically have less access to air conditioning, tree-shaded streets and parks, and insulated housing.
Cooling capacity is not just a matter of technology. Framing air conditioning as the answer to extreme heat is problematic. Access to air conditioning is extremely unequal across and within countries – most of the world’s population simply does not have it.
The biggest factors determining whether heat becomes dangerous are the conditions people are born into and live in.
Where you live, how your neighbourhood is built, whether there are trees or public drinking water nearby, how well ventilated your home is, whether your workplace offers protection, and whether public services respond to rising temperatures all shape survival. So do age, health, income, gender identity and discrimination, which can determine whose suffering is recognised and whose remains hidden.
Responses to heat are shaped by the social and physical environments people inhabit. In many places, air conditioning has displaced ancestral knowledge and intergenerational practices for living with heat, including ways of building, moving, eating, and resting developed over centuries. Losing those practices can leave people more exposed and less resilient.
Since 2020, as part of our cooling poverty project we have interviewed 80 people living in Rio’s low-income suburbs and favelas. Nineteen of these residents kept online heat diaries: writing records, collecting photos, drawings, memes and voice notes, of their daily encounters with extreme heat.
Advertisement
Caregivers had to change their routines so domestic labour could be carried out in the cooler hours of dawn and dusk. Street vendors moved locations or abandoned certain routes.
For one resident with mobility impairments, cold showers, the most immediate cooling strategy, are not possible: “I would love to take four cold showers a day, but I have some logistic issues related to my condition.” Because they depend on air conditioning, their electricity bills triple in summer. For others, the beaches and waterfalls some people escape to remain out of reach: “I would love to go, but I can’t because of accessibility issues”.
For trans women residents, social discrimination closes off the very spaces (parks, squares, shops) where others find shade or a moment of cool. And because public bathrooms mean risking harassment, many limit how much they drink. Heat, for them, becomes a bodily danger with no safe exit.
Systemic cooling poverty is not about whether a person can afford air conditioning, but rather how surrounding infrastructure, institutions and design, expose someone to harmful heat and then fail to protect them from heat. It extends beyond the home to workplaces, schools and healthcare systems, where heat can have serious consequences for health, productivity and wellbeing. It reaches further into the systemic causes that determine who suffers most: inequality, discrimination, patriarchy, ableism and racism.
Advertisement
Heat vulnerability is not an accidental outcome. Urban planning decisions that remove green space, housing policies that allow poorly ventilated buildings, labour laws that leave outdoor workers unprotected, public health systems that fail among the most exposed all contribute.
Thermal justice
Reframing cooling poverty changes how researchers think about solutions. Thermal justice does not only mean reducing exposure to heat. It also means doing so fairly, and holding accountable the people and institutions whose policies and planning decisions have made some neighbourhoods hotter and some households less able to keep cool.
By asking “who designed these conditions?”, we can understand who has the power to change them.
Effective responses require coordinated action across urban planning, public health, housing and labour regulation: expanding access to safe water, retrofitting buildings and planting trees alongside reducing discrimination.
Advertisement
But the people most affected need to help design solutions. Their experiences reveal what heat actually feels like, day after day. By understanding and assessing systemic cooling poverty, we can identify how best to achieve thermal justice for those most at risk from extreme heat.
Gold Derby edited an interview clip of Caitríona Balfe which appeared to make the actress label the whole Lanarkshire town her “worst location shoot”, angering residents.
12:40, 23 May 2026Updated 12:41, 23 May 2026
Outlander star Caitríona Balfe has received an apology from a US-based entertainment website who admitted her comments apparently branding a Scots town an ‘armpit’ was due to a video editing error. The leading actress appeared to label the whole Lanarkshire town as her “worst location shoot” in an interview alongside co-star Sam Heughan.
The viral clip angered Shotts residents and former MSP Alex Neil. However on Saturday it emerged Gold Derby had edited the video to remove a clarification from the actress, who played Claire Fraser in the drama, saying she was not referencing the whole town.
A statement from the site said: “A recent social video from Gold Derby featuring Outlander stars Caitríona Balfe and Sam Heughan has been removed from our social accounts due to an editing mistake, which unintentionally altered the meaning of one of Balfe’s responses. During a segment titled ‘And the Award Goes to…,’ Balfe replied to the prompt of ‘Worst Location Shoot’ by naming the town of Shotts, Scotland, but later clarified that she meant the specific shooting location in Shotts and not the entire town.
Advertisement
“During the course of editing the video, Balfe’s clarification was removed by mistake. Gold Derby deeply regrets the error and sincerely apologizes to Catrione Balfe, the people of Shotts, and everyone involved.”
In a filmed exchange with Dumfries and Galloway-born Heughan – who played her heartthrob husband Jamie Fraser for a decade – Balfe said: “We filmed at a place in Season 8, I think it’s called Shotts. An armpit… and I’m very sorry.”
Heughan then comments: “Oh…sorry Scotland.”
Advertisement
Content cannot be displayed without consent
However In the actual video clip, she said: “Sorry, Shotts. It’s a particular place in Shotts. I just want to be specific.
“It’s not the town — the little village. It was just… They found an old dump that was also kind of a swamp, and we were there for over a week, and our sets kept getting attacked, and it was just not my favorite place.”
Sources told the Record the Outlander crew had set up a base at a Shotts factory unit in 2024. They were there to film in the area for several months as Balfe made her directing debut on the second episode of the final season back that year, titled “Prophecies”.
But local sources claim the team departed after a matter of weeks after they “ran into difficulties” at the filming location at Hartwood Hill near Shotts. The source said: “The set quad bike was stolen and set fire to and they struggled further to secure the set.
Advertisement
“They also had a lot of difficulties with the ground being impenetrable.” Before knowing the comment was edited, Mr Neil invited Balfe back to the town to show her what it really has to offer.
The ex-MSP said: “There’s no denying the social problems facing Shotts because, like many other ex mining communities, no government has invested in these communities, so they’ve been allowed to run down physically. But the point is, in these communities the people have a heart of gold, they’re very good, decent hard working people who are trying to make the best of their lives and make ends meet in very difficult circumstances.
“Far from being the ‘armpit’ – which suggests the place stinks – the people are actually lovely people in Shotts. She is probably totally ignorant of its history.
“I would say to her, come back to Shotts. I’d be happy to show her around and introduce her to the people of Shotts so she gets an impression of the real Shotts instead of a fleeting visit and reaching a conclusion from what was probably a very limited experience of Shotts.”
Advertisement
After hearing that Balfe wasn’t talking about the whole town, Mr Neil said: “I’m delighted to hear she didn’t mean Shotts in general and I’m sorry the website edited her comments the way it did. I’m glad she’s received an apology for it.
“However my offer still stands. I’d be happy to welcome her to Shotts and show her around and meet the locals.”
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login