Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Politics

Minister Warns Putin After Russian Ship Fires Warning Shots Near British Yacht

Published

on

Minister Warns Putin After Russian Ship Fires Warning Shots Near British Yacht

A government minister warned Vladimir Putin “we see you” after a Russian warship fired warning shots near a British yacht in the English Channel.

Jane Kelvey, 68, and her husband Alan, 70, were on their 40ft vessel, Bright Future, travelling towards France when the shots were fired several times from the Russian frigate Admiral Grigorovich on Tuesday.

“It was a bit scary,” Mrs Kelvey told The i Paper. “I crouched down. I didn’t think our safety was in danger. But it was certainly unusual. As we sailed away, we said to each other, what the hell just happened?”

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the Admiral Grigorovich fired warning shots after making attempts to contact the yacht, which was about 20 nautical miles south of the Isle of Wight, outside the UK’s territorial waters.

Advertisement

An MoD spokesperson said: “These [shots] were not aimed at the vessel and were an attempt to prevent a possible collision.”

Nevertheless, Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds said the incident was further evidence of Russian aggression.

He told BBC Breakfast: “Let’s be in no doubt. Our message to Vladimir Putin is we see you, we see your activity, whether that is in waters around the UK coast or indeed whether that is in terms of cyber, or hybrid or any other modern forms of warfare.

“Vladimir Putin should be in no doubt that we will not hesitate to take the action that’s necessary to defend our country and our people.”

Advertisement

The minister added: “This government is absolutely determined in the face of that Russian threat to do all we can to keep this country safe.”

Russian warships passing through the English Channel are routinely shadowed by the Royal Navy, with offshore patrol vessel HMS Mersey monitoring the Admiral Grigorovich at the time of the incident on Tuesday.

The incident happened just days after UK armed forces intercepted a Russian “shadow fleet” oil tanker in the English Channel.

Royal Marine commandos and specially-trained law enforcement officers boarded the sanctioned vessel Smyrtos in the early hours of Sunday morning.

Advertisement

Shadow vessels carry sanctioned Russian oil, which is sold to raise funds to pay for the Kremlin’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Does Listening To An Audiobook Actually Count As Reading? Experts Weigh In

Published

on

Does Listening To An Audiobook Actually Count As Reading? Experts Weigh In

About 40% of Brits hadn’t finished a book in the 12 months between 2024-2025, YouGov reported.

Of those who had, 30% listened to an audiobook; 18% had ticked titles off their list through headphones, without ever picking up a physical book.

Some people think that shouldn’t “count,” though. For instance, author Nathan Bransford said in his blog, “Consuming an audiobook is a fundamentally different activity than reading. We already have a word for it: LISTENING”.

He also argued that reading from a page engages the brain differently. But not everyone agrees.

Advertisement

What does science say?

In 2016, Dr Beth Rogowsky, a professor specialising in language learning styles from Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, co-authored a study comparing comprehension rates for people listening to audiobooks to those who read from an e-reader page and another group who did both.

It tracked how much they remembered right after taking in the information and two weeks later.

Speaking to NPR, Dr Rogowsky said, “We found that there was no significant difference between reading a book using a Kindle or listening to a book or doing both – listening and reading simultaneously.”

Advertisement

Of course, that was only for adults who already knew how to read; the professor said physical books might be more helpful to children who can’t yet read.

But, to be fair, the “do audiobooks count?” debate does not rage among three-year-olds so much as it does those with Goodreads accounts and access to Reddit.

OK, but what about the word “reading”?

Fine, you might take in information from listening to an audiobook. But that isn’t the definition of the word reading – is it?

Advertisement

Well, major dictionaries don’t seem to agree about that.

Merriam-Webster defines “to read” as “to receive or take in the sense of (letters, symbols, etc.) especially [but not exclusively!] by sight or touch”.

Another definition – “to learn from what one has seen or found in writing or printing” – does not technically preclude listening.

Cambridge Dictionary, however, puts the first definition as “to look at words or symbols and understand what they mean,” and Collins Dictionary puts “look” in their main definition too.

Advertisement

TBH – who cares?

A very compelling article, written by visually impaired author James Tate Hill for Literary Hub, reads: “It was hard to say if the words read with my ears reached my brain differently from everything I had read with my eyes”.

For instance, he said, the narration of audiobooks placed a new layer on top of the experience – but it took “minutes” for the author’s words to override the narrator’s voice.

He identified as a “reader” thanks to his love of audiobooks, and added it “didn’t matter if I was reading or listening” to his favourite titles; “the words in my ears were the same words other people saw when they held a book in their hands.”

Advertisement

I have to agree. The strongest argument I can find against calling listening to audiobooks “reading” is a (disputed) semantic nuance, but I don’t find that compelling enough to stop someone calling themselves a reader if they want to (side note: self-identifying as a reader is linked to increased happiness).

It’s true that you can’t fold laundry while you’re rifling through War and Peace, and accents and pace changes are more in your control when you read from a page.

But seeing as two in five people aren’t enjoying books in any form, that information seems to land similarly whether it’s read from a page or some headphones, and that reading is good for us, whether we listen or look, I’m not particularly fussed about how it’s done.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

SAS soldier on trial for texting secret mission dead body pictures to girlfriend

Published

on

sas

sas

An SAS soldier is being prosecuted for allegedly sending grisly images of dead bodies and prisoners to his Royal Air Force (RAF) officer partner. The images were from a classified mission in 2021. The prosecution lawyer says the images risked compromising operations.

The SAS is the British Army’s most secretive and elite unit. The location of the mission has not been disclosed. The Rupert Murdoch-owned Sun newspaper reported on 16 June:

The accused, known as Soldier A, also shared comrades’ names and locations of their secret bases.

Adding:

Police found 1,100 classified pictures and 140 sensitive videos on his personal mobile phone, which he should not have had on missions, prosecutors said.

They allegedly included pics of corpses and prisoners from a foreign mission “which was classified secret”.

Advertisement

Royal Navy prosecutor Edward Hannah said:

 Soldier A divulged information to her that is sensitive, including photographs of himself.

Soldier A’s girlfriend is reportedly a serving RAF officer. Hannah said:

He told her where he was and gave her information about what he was doing.

SAS case

The Sun reported:

Bulford military court heard he was serving with a “specialist unit” and was leading a “sensitive site exploitation team” responsible for seizing intelligence during or after raids.

Soldier A denies:

Advertisement

one charge of disclosure of information useful to the enemy and two counts of negligence of duty.

Hannah said the senior soldier had:

kept imagery while on operation which can be used to help other units.

Adding that Soldier A should have:

used his common sense to know the information was classified.

The leak could have “damaged international relations”, Hannah argued.

The special forces soldier was:

Advertisement

arrested in January 2022. Police seized several electronic devices from his residence and “a significant amount of operational related material” which was classified secret.

UK special forces are rarely, if ever, commented upon by the UK government. Details of where the SAS was in combat in 2021 are not known but it is apparent from the trial that there were casualties. The trial continues at Bulford court martial centre.

Featured image via the Canary

By Joe Glenton

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Hiccups Can Be A Warning Sign Of A Stroke

Published

on

Strokes are better managed the earlier you get medical attention.

As hard as it can be to admit, you can have a stroke. Your loved one can have a stroke.

Statistically, someone in the United States has a stroke every 40 seconds; every 3 minutes and 14 seconds, someone dies of a stroke. It’s not a concern to ruminate on, per se, but one to be mindful of.

For example, you might avoid habits that can increase the risk, such as being sedentary, smoking, ignoring health concerns and drinking alcohol. Knowing the clear signs of a stroke – illustrated by the BE FAST acronym – is smart, too. BE FAST stands for (problems with) balance, eyesight, facial drooping, arm weakness, speech and time or terrible headache.

However, there’s also a surprising sign of a stroke that many people don’t know, according to vascular surgeons. Hiccups.

Advertisement

Ahead, experts explain how hiccups can be a sign of a stroke, other commonly missed signs and when to see the doctor about this seemingly “harmless” symptom.

How hiccups can signal a stroke

To understand why hiccups can be a sign of a stroke, it’s important to understand exactly what hiccups are – particularly, how they’re connected to the brain.

“Hiccups are caused by involuntary contractions of the diaphragm, coordinated by a reflex arc involving the brainstem, particularly the medulla,” said Dr. Christopher Yi, a board-certified vascular surgeon at MemorialCare Orange Coast Medical Center in Fountain Valley, California. “In rare cases, a stroke affecting this region – most classically a lateral medullary (Wallenburg) stroke – can disrupt that reflex and trigger persistent hiccups.”

Advertisement

Usually, hiccups aren’t so concerning. You might get them after eating too fast, moving too quickly after eating or drinking a carbonated beverage. But if a stroke in the brainstem is causing the hiccups, they need to be taken more seriously.

“In rare cases, hiccups can be linked to a stroke – specifically a stroke affecting the brainstem,” said Dr. Adeel Popalzai, a vascular neurologist and stroke program director at Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center.

“The brainstem is involved in the hiccup reflex pathway. When a stroke disrupts this area, it can cause persistent, uncontrollable hiccups that don’t respond to usual remedies.”

Yi affirmed that persistent hiccups have been documented in posterior circulation strokes, which affect the back of the brain. They also don’t always cause one-sided weakness (a classic symptom of a stroke) and rather present with more subtle symptoms. This makes hiccups an early and arguably clearer clue, especially when present with other neurologic abnormalities.

Advertisement

That last piece is vital because otherwise, a lot of us would get unnecessarily nervous when we get the hiccups, right?

“It is important to remember that hiccups alone are almost never a stroke, but persistent hiccups with other symptoms can be a warning sign,” Popalzai stressed.

Strokes are better managed the earlier you get medical attention.

Witthaya Prasongsin via Getty Images

Strokes are better managed the earlier you get medical attention.

Other commonly missed signs of a stroke

Hiccups aren’t the only symptom of a stroke that often goes ignored, especially with posterior circulation strokes.

Advertisement

“Many people expect a stroke to look dramatic, but some of the most dangerous strokes – especially those in the back of the brain – can present with subtle or misleading symptoms,” Popalzai warned.

The vascular surgeons listed the following symptoms:

  • Sudden dizziness, vertigo or a spinning sensation
  • Trouble walking, or loss of balance or coordination, which can look like clumsiness, intoxication, veering to one side, difficulty standing or coordinating movements and generalised weakness
  • Visual disturbances, such as double vision, trouble focusing or loss of part of the visual field
  • Difficulty swallowing
  • A sudden, severe headache (particularly in hemorrhagic strokes) – it can signal a brain bleed
  • Nausea and vomiting, especially when combined with dizziness or imbalance
  • Sudden confusion or trouble understanding, which can present as difficulty processing information or following a conversation, and may appear as disorientation or memory trouble.

“These symptoms are often missed because they don’t fit the ‘classic’ stroke picture, but they are just as important,” Popalzai said.

When to go to the doctor about hiccups or other stroke symptoms

Since hiccups are usually no big deal (well, other than being super annoying), how do you know when you’ve got a normal bout of the hiccups versus a stroke?

Advertisement

According to Yi, consider medical evaluation “when they persist for more than 48 hours, become severe or disruptive or occur in conjunction with neurologic symptoms.” Examples of the latter are the same as above: dizziness, vertigo, difficulty walking, imbalance, double vision, slurred speech and trouble swallowing.

Popalzai agreed it’s best to focus on the context and associated symptoms. He encouraged calling 999 immediately if you or a loved one experiences those signs.

Additionally, having a stroke risk factor, such as high blood pressure, diabetes, heart disease, smoking or a prior stroke, is also a reason to call the doctor ASAP.

“When symptoms are sudden and unusual, it’s always better to err on the side of caution and seek medical attention,” he added.

Advertisement

Yi emphasised the timely nature. “When hiccups present suddenly with any of these neurologic findings, the situation should be treated as a potential stroke emergency, and immediate medical attention is warranted, as timely intervention can significantly improve outcomes,” he said.

The bottom line is that while most hiccups are harmless, they can signal a stroke when accompanied by other brain-related symptoms. Don’t let an unexpected sign of a stroke convince you that a stroke isn’t at play. Take it all seriously.

“Acting fast can save brain function, independence and life,” Popalzai said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

According To An Expert, You Should Never Do This One Thing When You Flush

Published

on

According To An Expert, You Should Never Do This One Thing When You Flush

If you spend hours cleaning your bathroom several times a week, put the bleach down: you’re wasting a whole lot of time according to one molecular virology expert.

Emma Harding, postdoctoral researcher at the University of Oxford, has shared that using soapy water to clean your bathroom just once a week is more than enough.

The pro told 9Honey Living: “Soapy water is very effective at killing a wide range of microbes, so your regular cleaning can be done with that.”

If stuff does start getting grottier than soapy water can handle, Harding advises using disinfectant once a month.

Advertisement

In terms of what needs cleaning the most, the expert says that “high-touch surfaces” such as taps and showers should be the priority.

However, there is one non-negotiable – when it comes to cleaning your bathroom, the toilet is an essential.

Harding adds that if anyone in your household is unwell it is crucial to give your entire toilet and bathroom a thorough scrub when they’ve recovered to stop anyone else catching the bug.

Want to keep bugs at bay? It’s all about how you flush the loo after you’ve done your business, according to the expert.

Advertisement

“The bathroom is one of the dirtiest places in the house, especially if it has the toilet in the same room,” Harding explains.

“As a general rule, always flush with the lid down to prevent particles from escaping the toilet bowl and settling elsewhere.”

When you flush the toilet with the lid open, a delightful plume of germs fly out of your loo and settle on the surfaces in your bathroom.

That plume includes nasty poo and wee particles that can carry everything from E. coli to Covid-19 – so it’s really important you shut that lid before you flush.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform council brands Zionist pothole machine ‘uneconomical’

Published

on

Reform leader Nigel Farage in front of JCB's Zionist pothole machine

Reform leader Nigel Farage in front of JCB's Zionist pothole machine

Reform UK has been making a lot of noise about JCB’s pothole-filling machine, and with obvious reason. Voters hate potholes, and JCB is one of the most evil companies in the UK, so of course Farage & co. would want to work with them. As it turns out, though, the magical pothole machine may not be all it’s cracked up to be. And our source on that is a Reform-run council:

Advertisement

Mechanised ethnic cleansing

First things first, we should explain why we called JCB one of the most evil companies in the UK.

As we reported in September 2025, the Stop JCB campaign reported on how JCB supports “ethnic cleansing and genocide in Palestine, India, and Kashmir”. We added:

In Palestine, JCB operates through its sole dealer, the Israeli company Comasco. The corporation holds contracts with Israel’s Ministry of Defence for the same model of JCB machines the Zionist settler state uses in the demolitions and construction of settlements.

JCB has been at it for a long time, with photographers catching Israeli forces demolishing homes in the West Bank using their machinery as early as 2006. We also noted:

Currently, JCB is also complicit in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza. UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese listed JCB in her July report. This was among numerous companies directly aiding and profiting from the genocide. Israel has long used armoured, unbranded JCB High Mobility Engineer Excavator (HMEE) machines, known as ‘Ami’ in Hebrew, and is now using them in Gaza.

Oh, and no points for guessing which party JCB’s billionaire owner and peer Anthony Bamford supports:

Advertisement

Reform are all filler

Given Farage’s connection to Bamford, it’s unsurprising he made a big deal out of promoting the Zionist pothole machine:

Now, a Reform council has suggested Bamford’s hole plugger isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. As reported by the BBC, a 2025 report from Leicestershire County Council (LCC) found:

After two demonstrations, officers concluded that the JCB Pothole Pro did not stack up as an economical piece of kit to repair potholes in Leicestershire

Additionally:

The JCB PP is big – it’s bigger than a normal excavator, it would not be suitable for small defect repairs – the machine is too big and would close the road, it would be inefficient to travel round repairing small potholes.

Another problem was that the quantity of potholes they had to deal with meant they couldn’t:

Advertisement

utilise Pothole Pro’s full potential on a daily basis – which in turn would make it very inefficient

And also:

After two demonstrations, officers concluded that the JCB Pothole Pro did not stack up as an economical piece of kit to repair potholes in Leicestershire

JCB – a company which is happy for its product to be used for ethnic cleansing – suggested that LCC weren’t using the machine correctly, and that a longer test was needed. LCC aren’t the first to criticise what the machine can do anyway:

Bunged up

Given the update, it’s no wonder people are saying things like this:

Advertisement

Personally, we don’t think any council should be working with companies that facilitate ethnic cleansing. The fact that these machines may not be all they’re cracked up to be just adds insult to injury.

If Reform should replace Labour in government, we’ve no doubt there’ll be many more questionable contracts, anyway. And the real hole left to fill will be the economic one left behind when they get kicked out.

Advertisement

Featured image via The Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

How Journalists Verify Information in the Digital Age

Published

on

How Journalists Verify Information in the Digital Age

In today’s world, where news cycles have shrunk to seconds and social media has become the primary source of content, the role of quality journalism has undergone fundamental changes. Digital journalism now faces an unprecedented challenge: how to maintain speed of publication without sacrificing accuracy. In the midst of global information noise, the ability to properly verify information has become a necessary condition for the survival of independent media.

The Evolution of Fact-Checking in the Digital Age

Traditional verification methods based on personal contacts and official requests are now being supplemented by complex technological processes. The problem is that fake news and misinformation spread like wildfire, often outpacing official rebuttals. Modern journalists are forced to work in a state of “constant doubt,” where every piece of data is subjected to rigorous analysis.

To maintain a high level of information accuracy, newsrooms implement strict protocols. These protocols involve checking a speaker’s words and conducting technical audits of information’s digital footprint. It’s important to understand that fact-checking is a continuous process that accompanies a story at every stage of its creation.

Methodology and Journalistic Standards

Despite all changes in technology, ethical principles and related journalistic standards endure. It is crucial to achieve as much impartiality as possible when presenting information to the reader. Therefore, you can’t observe media ethics without cross-checking all the data you use and making sure you have three or more independent sources for each bit of it.

Advertisement

The verification process in modern newsrooms typically looks like this:

  1. Primary source identification and reliability assessment.
  2. Technical analysis of photo and video metadata.
  3. Cross-referencing obtained information with public records.
  4. Confirming event geolocation via satellite imagery.
  5. Contextualizing the data by means of consulting experts.

This approach minimizes the risk of spreading false news and busts your publication’s source credibility appropriately in your readers’ minds.

Digital Investigation Tools and OSINT

Amidst all the new additions to journalistic workflows, the incorporation of open-source intelligence (OSINT) definitely stands out. It is no longer possible to imagine investigative journalism without the comprehensive all-round analysis of assorted public information, such as social networks, CCTV footage, or open data records.

It is, of course, worth noting that in-depth digital research requires special sets of tools. Some data should really only be accessed anonymously for safety reasons, for example if the article you’re writing requires mining so-called darknet websites for information. Then there is all the data that is region-locked. Any professional should be familiar with the technical solutions that aid in these cases. For example, when confidentiality is needed to analyze foreign databases or avoid blocks, researchers prefer to buy SOCKS5 proxy, which provides a stable and secure connection when working with sensitive information.

Digital investigations today are impossible without mastery of reverse image search tools and social graph analysis. Journalists examine the digital footprint of every online source to ensure an account isn’t a bot or created specifically to spread disinformation.

Advertisement

Verifying Visual Content

When everyone with a smartphone camera is a potential witness and everyone with an AI video generation app is a potential disrupter, you have to be very careful with visual evidence. The methods used in modern news verification are rather varied, and many of them only a decade ago would have looked like something out of a sci-fi show.

Journalists analyze shadows in photos to determine the time of day. They also check weather conditions for a given day using archived meteorological data and match landscapes in videos with terrain maps. The information verification process includes checking whether an image has been edited or created using artificial intelligence. Understanding how image-processing algorithms work has become a mandatory requirement for those involved in news reporting.

Working with Public Records and Data

Access to public records has become the foundation of quality investigations. Journalists analyze financial reports, court archives, and corporate documents. This allows them to uncover hidden connections and conflicts of interest that cannot be found through simple interviews.

Effective information verification requires a systematic approach:

Advertisement
  1. Tracing asset ownership history through government databases.
  2. Analyzing official declarations and comparing them with actual expenditures.
  3. Monitoring government procurement for corrupt schemes.
  4. Using specialized software to process large datasets.

A proper approach ensures that reporting is based on facts, not speculation. This is critically important for maintaining an independent media outlet’s reputation.

Community-Sourced Fact-Checking

Recent years saw the rise of communities and official organizations who deal in fact-checking as a trade. These are the people who establish lines of communication with the newsroom, have their own databases of sources, and are the first to chase every important leak. The cooperation between these groups, journalists, and OSINTers helps strengthen industry-wide standards when it comes to ethical, objective, trustworthy reporting.

Verification is a collective responsibility. When journalists share methods and tools, it raises overall media literacy in society. It’s important that readers understand how information made it to a publication’s pages and what steps were taken to confirm it.

Psychological Aspects and Cognitive Biases

Working on information verification is both a technical and a psychological process. Journalists must be aware of their own cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias — where a person subconsciously seeks out facts that support their viewpoint while actively ignoring contradictory data.

Professional discipline requires setting aside emotions and approaching every source with the same level of skepticism. This is especially important when covering conflicts or political crises, where manipulating public opinion becomes a primary goal for many participants.

Advertisement

The Future of Verification in Media

Deepfake technologies have been with us for some time, but the recent rise in AI development has truly empowered the people behind them. Now, the web is teeming with videos that look very real despite being created with nothing but clever prompts, often in a matter of minutes. That presents extra fact-checking challenges that the industry is currently seeking solutions for.

In the nearest future, we can expect to see the emergence of automated credibility monitoring systems for digital journalism to rely on. However, even with those on hand, we’ll still need real people with their inquisitive minds and moral compasses. Critical thinking and the ability to ask the right questions is more critical than ever in the current tumultuous landscape.

Conclusion

In the modern digital age, the fight against misinformation continues to be an uphill battle. However, a lot of the tools available today also enable daring OSINT escapades to a previously unthinkable degree. Armed with rigid ethical standards and flexible digital tools, a journalist can expose the truth and deliver it to their readers.

By Nathan Spears

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer’s social-media ban will do huge harm to young people

Published

on

Starmer’s social-media ban will do huge harm to young people

This week, the government announced a social-media ban for under-16s in the UK. It is set to come into effect by spring next year.

While UK prime minister Keir Starmer insists nine out of 10 parents support it, the ban has not met with unanimous praise. Ian Russell, whose daughter Mollie took her own life in 2017 after viewing suicide content online, has accused Starmer of ‘political opportunism’.

Given how shallow and performative Starmer’s justification for the ban has been, it’s hard to disagree with Russell. The prime minister’s claim that social-media platforms stop ‘children doing their homework, reading, playing with their friends outside, [and] going to bed at a decent hour’ betrays a profound ignorance of just how much childhood has changed in recent decades, long before the surge of social-media use in the 2010s.

Advertisement

In truth, much of the harm to children, from their retreat indoors to their isolation, now being attributed to social media, began with the rise of safetyist culture during the 1990s. The state was happy to sanction the portrayal of the outside world as a dangerous, risky place. The rise of ‘stranger danger’ awareness campaigns made parents reluctant to allow their children to play outside long before TikTok. As Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt argue in The Coddling of the American Mind, social-media sites are only one side of the coin. Yes, young people today are more risk-averse and, as a result, less resilient than previous generations. But society has done just as much to confine children to their bedrooms as social media.

When I was a teenager in the late 2010s, social media could indeed be a ‘Wild West’ of strange and often unwanted content. But social-media sites also gave teenagers access to things that adult society wasn’t offering. They gave a platform for children to be free, to explore new communities and outlets, to seek out others with the same interests and passions. And they did so when physical spaces were often cut off or heavily supervised. This was particularly important during the Covid lockdowns, when the same politicians now railing against social media’s impact on the young did everything they could to keep a generation of children locked in their homes.

A social-media ban will only exacerbate young teens’ frustration over their lack of independence. It will be experienced as a loss of control they felt they had over an area of their own lives. The freedom and the space to make mistakes in real life, just as much as the online world, are important for young people. Without it, they can’t learn life lessons, be held responsible or make amends. To become independent, they need to be given the space to make decisions that have consequences in the world around them – to learn that they are part of something bigger than themselves.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Advertisement

Please wait…

Advertisement

That isn’t to say we need to romanticise social media. For some young people, the algorithmic echo chambers can lead to spirals of insecurity. In many ways, social-media platforms have reinforced the worst aspects of modern childhood: pressures of educational achievement and expectations of conformity lead to early adultification, while opportunities, responsibilities and freedoms in the outside world decline.

But the crux of the issue for young people growing up online is not the social-media platforms themselves. Rather, it is the prevailing culture of moral relativism and weakened adult authority. Young people lack the framework, which once would have been provided by older generations, to make sense of the intensely globalised, politicised and polarised content online.

Advertisement

What this speaks to is not so much the dangerous power of Big Tech, but the loss of intergenerational knowledge and communication between parents and children. Parental authority has been outsourced to so-called experts, and community experience and values have been eroded by the preoccupation with cosmopolitan norms. Parents and trusted adults have been warned against giving guidance and teaching lessons to their kids due to their allegedly outdated understanding of the world and the prejudices they may have. No wonder, then, that children have become prisoners to everything they see and hear online.

For a political class bereft of principle, social-media platforms have become a convenient bogeyman. We witnessed this in April’s Clapham unrest, when hundreds of young people wreaked havoc on the streets. This was clear evidence of a profound breakdown in parenting and policing – yet social-media platforms, particularly TikTok, were blamed as the source of the problem. Young people may have wilfully broken the rules, but the bigger issue is that the adults in the room rarely try to enforce them.

Advertisement

Starmer’s desire to get children back to reading, sleeping and playing outside cannot be mandated. Children’s behaviour ought to be the responsibility of parents, not No10. The social-media ban will only further erode parents’ authority. After all, if the government doesn’t trust parents, why should their children?

What we need is not a ban on social media, but a conversation about how we strengthen the lives of young people. Further weakening the authority of adults is not the way to go about this.

Like everything Keir Starmer does, his social-media ban is pointless and self-defeating. Children need a strong society to help them flourish as adults – not a stronger nanny state.

Emma Gilland is event coordinator for the Academy of Ideas and author of The Corona Generation: Coming of Age in a Crisis, written with Jennie Bristow and published by Zero Books.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump Supports Fresh Penalties On Putin After Zelenskyy Talk

Published

on

Trump Supports Fresh Penalties On Putin After Zelenskyy Talk

Donald Trump has signalled that he is looking to increase sanctions on Russia again as the US is on the cusp of an agreement with Iran.

The US president was speaking shortly after a face-to-face conversation with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy at the G7 summit in France.

Trump put a waiver on countries buying sanctioned Russian oil earlier this year when global energy supplies were put under strain by the US and Israeli war in Iran.

The controversial move – which undermined years of co-ordinated efforts to punish Russia from Ukraine’s allies – came after Iran effectively shut down the major oil shipping lane, the Strait of Hormuz, in the wake of US-Israeli strikes on Tehran.

Advertisement

But America and Iran have now agreed to hash out a new deal in the next 60 days, and the president has suggested oil transportation will resume.

Trump told reporters at the G7: “Soon we’ll be able to do [reapply penalties against Russia] because the oil is now flowing.

“So we took sanctions off because obviously we’re not looking to impede the US, so we’re in a position to do that soon.”

Senate Democrats told Kyiv Independent in April that Russia earned an additional $150 million per day due to the waiver.

Advertisement

Trump’s shocking decision to ease those penalties came after more than year of yo-yoing from the US president over the Ukraine war, which he once pledged to end within the first 24 hours of his second term.

He has repeatedly rolled out the red carpet for Russia and tried to push Ukraine to give up more land in the name of peace.

But Trump’s remarks from the G7 summit could signal a wider pivot back to support for Kyiv from the White House.

Vladimir Putin is thought to be on the back foot right now in the Ukraine war, more than four years after he first started his illegal land grab.

Advertisement

The economic cost of the conflict, the staggering number of casualties and Kyiv’s recent strikes into the heart of Russia mean Putin is at a disadvantage.

Zelenskyy said ahead of the G7 summit that he was ready to meet his Russian counterpart in the French Alps for face-to-face negotiations, but claimed Putin was not ready to talk.

The Kremlin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov hit back, saying: “There are currently no official channels between Kyiv and Moscow.”

He repeated Putin’s previous claims that Zelenskyy could go to Russia if he wanted to talk.

Advertisement

Zelenskyy also sent an open letter to the Russian leader earlier this month calling for them to meet for further negotiations.

But Putin described the missive as “rude,” and rejected it almost immediately.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Cabinet Minister Calls Kemi Badenoch To Apologize For Nazi Remark

Published

on

Cabinet Minister Calls Kemi Badenoch To Apologize For Nazi Remark

Kemi Badenoch has been told she is “not fit to be prime minister” after comparing a cabinet minister to a Nazi.

The Tory leader said education secretary Bridget Phillipson “has acted like a Gestapo officer” by ending a tax break for private schools.

Badenoch made the remark in an interview with The Spectator.

Responding on X, Phillipson said: “The Gestapo marched hundreds of thousands of innocent people to their deaths. I’ve ended private schools’ tax breaks to invest in state schools.

Advertisement

“No responsible leader makes vile comparisons like this. Kemi Badenoch is not fit to be Prime Minister.”

Labour MP Phil Brickell, secretary of the all party parliamentary group on Germany, called on Badenoch to apologise.

He said: “Kemi Badenoch’s characterisation of Bridget Phillipson as having ‘acted like a Gestapo officer’ over private school VAT fees are contemptible, unbecoming of any parliamentarian and demonstrate – yet again – that Badenoch is completely unfit for public office.

“Her remarks serve no purpose but to undermine the UK-Germany relationship and sow unnecessary division. Ad hominem attacks such as this inexplicable reference to Nazi-era officials should not be tolerated in our public discourse.

“I had hoped that language such as this was a thing of the past. Kemi Badenoch should withdraw her comments immediately and unreservedly apologise.”

Advertisement

A spokesman for Badenoch said: “Bridget Phillipson has pursued a class war on independent schools, forcing many treasured schools to shut, upending the lives of young people across the country, and sending hundreds of children into already overcrowded state schools.

“Worse still, the money from her vindictive tax raid was supposed to fund new teachers, and even the Department for Education’s own website says teacher numbers are lower than under the Conservatives.

“Instead of getting self-righteous, Phillipson should focus on her job. Or even better – stand aside for someone who isn’t out to ruin the lives of people who don’t vote Labour.”

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

London On Heatwave Alert Again As Temperatures Set To Hit 30C

Published

on

London On Heatwave Alert Again As Temperatures Set To Hit 30C

Soon after a 35°C May record-breaker, the Met Office said more heatwaves are likely in the UK this summer.

And it turns out they may be just days away from being proven right in London.

As of the time of writing (17 June), temperatures between 28°C and 30°C are expected in the capital this weekend.

Here’s what you need to know about: when that could happen, what it would take to count as an official heatwave, and why hot spells can be so insufferable in the city.

Advertisement

When could there be a heatwave in London this June?

The Met Office predicts our current miserable weather will take a sunnier turn on Friday, 19 June.

At that point, temperatures will rise to 29°C.

From then on, per the Met Office, Londoners can expect:

Advertisement
  • Friday 19 June: 29°C
  • Saturday 20 June: 28°C
  • Sunday 21 June: 30°C.

Even if the highest of those temperatures come to pass, however, an official heatwave may still not have taken place.

When is it officially a heatwave in London?

A heatwave is defined as three back-to-back days at or above an area’s maximum temperature threshold.

Because some parts of the UK are usually hotter than others, that upper limit changes depending on location.

As you head further North or West, that threshold is set a little lower than the warmer South-East – around 25°C and 26°C.

Advertisement

But in London, the threshold is 28°C.

That means that it’d need to reach at least 28°C on Tuesday after the predicted Sunday and Monday temperatures to officially count (or Saturday would have to be a degree hotter than currently anticipated).

Why does London feel so hot on sunny days?

As we mentioned before, London is already in the warmer South-East. Then, there’s the infrastructure to consider.

Advertisement

Speaking to HuffPost UK previously, Richard Millard, senior sustainability consultant at Building Energy Experts, said that built-up areas can make already brutal UK heatwaves even more unbearable.

“Our towns and cities have a large urban heat island effect due to the amount of concrete, asphalt and such that absorbs heat and releases it slowly, making cities and towns feel hotter,” he shared.

2026′s two consecutive record-breaking May temperatures were recorded in London’s Kew Gardens this year (34.8°C and 35.1°C, respectively).

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025