Threat actors are increasingly turning massive infostealer-derived credential collections into searchable underground services, allowing buyers to request credentials for a specific company, platform, domain, geography, or account type.

Flare researchers analyzed 470 underground forum posts published between January 2025 and June 2026, across different sources, related to actors offering to search for and extract stolen credentials from their databases. The dataset included advertisements, reposts, buyer feedback, pricing references, and disputes around quality and validity.

The findings show a dedicated service layer sitting between infostealer infections, raw logs trading and account takeover activity. The profile of the threat actors who offer these services is divided between the Malware-as-a-Service (MaaS) providers and the MaaS consumers.

In many cases, they function as credential brokers or data processors, monetizing the vast number of logs and their ability to search, filter, format, and deliver targeted results from large stolen credential collections.

Key Points

• Analysis of 470 underground posts illustrates a pinpointed service that offers targeted extraction, filtering, deduplication, formatting, and freshness, from large infostealers databases containing tens of billions of lines. It is functioning as an alternative to combo lists, where instead of purchasing a bulk dump, buyers query a seller’s existing data and receive only the results that match their target.

• The market overlaps with the Initial Access Broker (IAB) ecosystem, but is not identical to it, when the common output formats included URL:LOGIN:PASS, MAIL:PASS, LOGIN:PASS, PHONE:PASS, MAIL:PHONE, and MAIL:LOGIN.

• Interestingly buyer feedback showed there’s a gap between what is advertised and the actual results in terms of in reality the volume is lower, the credentials are often invalid, duplicated and generally usable.

How Does the “Search Your Target” Service Work

The “search your target” market sits in the middle of the account takeover chain.

First, infostealers infect devices and collect credentials, cookies, autofill data, and browser artifacts. Then logs are aggregated and inserted into private clouds, ULP databases, public dumps, or exchange-based collections. Next, the “search-service” threat actors extract rows based on buyers’ requests. Buyers then validate the credentials and use them for account takeover, fraud, spam, phishing, crypto theft, or corporate intrusion.

This means the sellers in this dataset are often neither the first nor final step. They are the processing layer that turns stolen credential noise into targeted attack material.

From a threat intelligence framework perspective, this service model represents a practical example of T1589.001 (Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials), where adversaries actively research and acquire credentials prior to exploitation, and potentially T1650 (Acquire Access), given that some sellers deliver results indistinguishable from direct access provisioning.

The “Search Your Target” Market Economy

Much like in the DDoS market, where the buyer submits a domain and the service provider attacks it, the service is duplicated and offers the same pipeline. 

1. A buyer sends a target

2. The seller returns matching credentials

That target can be a company domain, login URL, ecommerce site, gaming platform, application, geographic market, or a list of emails. The output is usually delivered in formats such as URL:LOGIN, URL:LOG, MAIL, LOGIN, PHONE, or other combinations depending on the request.

Several sellers in the underground specify the size of their database as a selling point. One actor advertised an “ULP 5kkk+ lines” database (5,000,000,000), quick access within 10–15 minutes, daily updates, and sources that allegedly included private logs, private clouds, personal streams, and public data. Another actor promoted a 10kkk+ line, 1TB+ URL:LOG database, while others claimed access to collections ranging from hundreds of millions to tens of billions of records.

The size of the database isn’t the only selling point. Threat actors also indicate  other capabilities, as part of their sales pitch. The sellers are also advertising their search capabilities, freshness, formatting, and relevance.

Some offer simple domain extraction, while others offer more customized services, such as extracting email accounts for a requested shop, website, app, or game. De-facto, attackers are advertising their technical capabilities of indexing data inside databases, updating and enabling quick and convenient search on it.

As an example, one of the sellers advertised that customers could submit a request for only $20 per request, and add additional payment based on the returned results.

The dataset also showed more advanced forms of credential enrichment. One actor claimed access to separate email, password, login, phone, and URL:Login collections, and described how those records could be combined.

For example, a buyer with only an email list could request matching login pairs, or a buyer looking for a specific geography could receive results built from country codes, domains, URLs, cities, and password patterns.

This further indicates that threat actors are using data best practices (e.g. labeling, slicing), much like ordinary legitimate businesses around the world.

Customers Feedback Shows a Gap Between Ads and Reality

Customer feedback indicates that the sellers are over-promising and under-delivering. They claim that some sellers aren’t credible. Some claim that the credentials are invalid, and sellers answer in return that they didn’t ever check if the credentials were valid. Some said that this is the same data that appears in large combo lists published for free across the underground.

Others claim that these databases contain many duplications (one even claimed that out of 3,000 records only 200 were unique).

While the concept of large combo lists or aggregated credential files, isn’t new. This service is still something unique that can eventually, if operated correctly,  put a lot of businesses and organizations at risk.

Developed Alongside the Infostealers Market

Over the past several years, infostealer families and log marketplaces produced enormous quantities of records that include browser-stored credentials, cookies, autofill data, and device information. These collections are constantly growing and create a challenge for buyers to sort it out for profit.

The operation to more easily extract value was an opportunity for commercialization. Therefore, a buyer who usually has a specific pinpointed goal can save time and money with this service.

Comparison Between the “Search Your Target” Market and the IAB Market

The “search your target” market is often tied to a  general search for an email or business or person, the validity and “freshness” of access isn’t guaranteed, and you are basically paying for search, find, and results. This market partially overlaps with the initial access broker’s (IAB) market.

When buyers are looking for access to corporate VPNs, SaaS platforms, email accounts, cloud environments, admin panels, or remote access systems, the output can become initial access if these markets overlap.

Nevertheless, the IAB market is often more expensive, prestigious and serves as a “white glove service” when they sell validated access, which often can bypass MFA, and ultimately  get into an organization.

What Defenders Should Learn

The “search your target” market shows that attackers no longer need to manually process massive dumps to find what matters. They can outsource that work to sellers who specialize in turning noisy credential collections into focused target lists. For defenders, the challenge is to identify and close those exposed paths before a buyer turns them into access.

Flare helps by giving security teams visibility into these underground markets and by monitoring exposed employee credentials, corporate domains, login portals, SaaS applications, and related indicators across deep and dark web sources.

This allows organizations to detect when their access points appear in credential collections or search-service advertisements, prioritize the most relevant exposures, and respond faster with password resets, session revocation, MFA enforcement, and investigation of possible account misuse.

Learn more by signing up for our free trial.

Sponsored and written by Flare.

In a nutshell: Obsidian, the developer behind some of the best RPGs of all time, is being sued. A class-action lawsuit has been filed against the Fallout: New Vegas maker over allegations that it violated California wage and hour laws.

The case, Victoria Turner v. Obsidian Entertainment, was originally filed in Orange County Superior Court in October 2025. It appears to have gone largely unnoticed until Reddit user macken_zee highlighted the docket and court documents on the r/pcgaming subreddit. An amended complaint was filed on January 12, 2026.

Turner is listed in The Outer Worlds 2 credits as a QA lead. The filing seeks to represent current and former nonexempt employees who worked for Obsidian in California from October 9, 2021, through the date of class certification. It also seeks to certify a separate group of employees who left the company from October 9, 2022, onward.

The complaint alleges that Obsidian “engaged in a systematic pattern of wage and hour violations under the California Labor Code and Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders.”

Those alleged violations include failing to pay all minimum and overtime wages, failing to pay wages owed when employees left the company, failing to pay wages on time during employment, denying lawful meal and rest breaks or compensation in place of them, failing to reimburse necessary business expenses, and failing to provide accurate itemized wage statements.

The lawsuit seeks monetary relief for affected workers, including unpaid wages, unreimbursed expenses, interest, benefits, attorneys’ fees, costs, and penalties.

Obsidian said that it denies “generally and specifically, each and every allegation.” In a response filed in March, the studio asked for the complaint to be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.

The company also laid out 38 points in its defence. Among them, Obsidian argues that the complaint does not state sufficient facts to support valid claims, and that Turner and any proposed class members “consented to and/or acquiesced in the alleged conduct.”

Reddit users have been arguing over whether California employees can waive meal and rest break protections. Others have urged caution, noting that complaints and responses in wage suits can contain broad, boilerplate allegations and defenses long before the facts are tested.

There has been little movement in the case since Obsidian’s March response. The suit remains pending

Getty already struck a similar deal with Perplexity AI.

The Svarva lamp can be twisted into different shapes.

Courtesy of Johan Ejdemo

PS Svarva Floor Lamp

“Some stuff I did myself, like this one. The Svarva lamp we made with the design group Front for the PS 2009 collection. They were quite newly established and so we did an armchair and this lamp. The desire was to do a wooden turned lamp, but you should also be able to twist it, articulate it.”

“I felt that that would be very difficult to do. Along with a colleague in lighting at the time, I went to Hungary to this factory that was producing lamps for us. It was all metal tubes that they were doing, so we were a little bit hesitant whether they should be able to solve this. But they made some mock-ups based on the designer drawings. So we went there to have a look, and it was standing there. It was this floor lamp, and also a table lamp where the wooden beads were going in a circle and then up, like a snake.”

“What we didn’t know was that next to the lamp factory was this factory that was doing the turned wooden beads, the small individual pieces that we put together. None of us knew that. It was just pure serendipity. So they were turning these wooden beads, and the lamp factory was putting them on the metal tubes, just like on a necklace. They had very little to do, so they were happy to get the business.”

A Sinka Cabinet resides in Ejdemo’s hallway.

Courtesy of Johan Ejdemo

PS Sinka Cabinet

“I have another favorite from that PS 2009 collection, it’s in my hallway. The PS Sinka, with the small drawers with a wooden base. Sinka means “dovetail” in Swedish, so the name explaining that construction.”

“But the problem we had with this one was the packaging volume was too big. So what we did was each drawer is slightly shallower. So four drawers stack into each other. And four more drawers stack. There’s a little bit of a stopper in the back when you push them in, so they stop evenly at the front. There’s also a hidden compartment behind the smallest drawer. Really good drawers for all this stuff that is just lying around and getting in the way. In the top one I have all my keys that I no longer know where they go.”

PS Jonsberg Vases

“I have this vase from the PS collection to hold the cables [on my Samsung Serif TV]. It was a set, the Jonsberg vases by Hella Jongerius. There were four of them in different ceramic techniques. I had all four, but the terracotta one broke, which was a pity.” [It certainly is. These $39 vases now sell secondhand for $1,700 for a full set.]

“They’re inspired by different regions, and the different techniques are beautiful. I use the big black one for toilet paper in one bathroom. It’s not disrespect for the design. It’s just such a good design to stand there, and it makes the bathroom beautiful, and it can fit the toilet roll. So, why have something like an ugly stick? It’s nice for that.”

Pax Wardrobes

“Pax. We have to mention Pax. I have Pax wardrobes in a few rooms, but also I’m a little bit peculiar. Like in the kitchen, these veneer doors have been sanded and hand-painted by me, just to make them fit my house, in my space. I repaint them sometimes.”

Chipped Spraka pepper mills.

Courtesy of Johan Ejdemo

Spraka Pepper Mills

“I have these pepper mills. One for white pepper, one for black pepper. That was also in a PS collection. We did these with Marcus Arvonen. These pepper mills are beautiful, and these have been around for, like, 20 years as well. They are pretty tall. A smaller version came later on, but I like these.”

“They have their chips, yes, but this just makes them nicer. It’s age. They’ve been around and are used every day. Everything has a little bit of imperfection. You can spend your whole life bothering about that, but there should be some imperfection in life. Fix it? Then something else needs fixing. It just moves. Leave it, be proud.”

Where’s the Billy Bookcase or Kallax?

“I don’t have a Billy in the house now. But there have been! Kallax? I have owned many. Brilliant piece. Really good for vinyl, because that’s the time they come from. I listen to a lot of vinyl.”

MacBook Air M5

MSRP $1,099.00

Advertisement

“Performance stopped mattering. Excellence remained.”

Pros

• Great battery life
• Thin and light
• Good performance

Cons

• No OLED yet
• That display notch

Quick Take

The MacBook Air M5 is what happens when Apple keeps refining an already excellent laptop instead of reinventing it. On paper, the upgrades feel modest. The design is unchanged, the display is still 60Hz, and the M5 chip isn’t delivering the dramatic leap that makes last year’s model instantly obsolete. Yet after spending two weeks with it, none of that really matters.

What stands out is how effortless everything feels. The M5 delivers more performance than most users will ever need, battery life remains excellent, the keyboard and trackpad are still among the best in the business, and macOS Tahoe continues to benefit from Apple’s tightly integrated ecosystem.

The lack of an OLED display and the continued presence of the notch prevent it from being perfect, but they are minor complaints in an otherwise outstanding package.

If you’re coming from an Intel Mac, an M1 MacBook Air, or an ageing Windows laptop, the MacBook Air M5 is one of the easiest laptop recommendations I’ve made in years. It’s not revolutionary. It’s just exceptionally good at almost everything.

Apple MacBook Air M5 Specifications

I bought the base-model MacBook Air M5, specifically the 13-inch version with 16GB of unified memory and 512GB of storage. No upgrades, no custom configuration, and no attempt to justify spending even more money on a laptop – instead, the version most people are likely to buy.

Here’s the short version of this review: stop worrying about performance.

Reviewers will show benchmark charts because that’s what we do. Those charts will tell you the M5 is faster than the M4. They are correct. The M5 is faster. Apple has once again made the number bigger.

The problem is that the numbers stopped mattering a while ago.

The M4 MacBook Air already had more performance than most people would ever need. The M5 simply adds even more horsepower to a machine that was never struggling in the first place. It is a bit like replacing a sports car with an even faster sports car when your daily commute consists mostly of traffic lights and roadworks.

What you actually notice is how effortlessly everything works.

I’ll admit that unboxing the MacBook Air gave me a genuine little buzz. Partly because it is a gorgeous piece of hardware. The Sky Blue finish is particularly lovely, looking silver from some angles before revealing a subtle blue tint when the light catches it.

The bigger reason is that I’m now in my late 30s, and this is apparently what excitement looks like. Some people buy concert tickets. I admire laptop finishes.

Booting up takes around 30 seconds, although I should mention that about half of that time is spent entering my password incorrectly. Once you’re in, everything feels instant. Safari opens in less than a second. Apple Music launches before I’ve fully registered, clicking on it.

Coming from an ageing Windows laptop, the difference is striking. My old machine approached every task with the enthusiasm of someone being asked to help a friend move house on a Sunday morning. The MacBook Air M5, meanwhile, treats every request like it has had three coffees and a motivational speech.

And honestly, that’s the real story here. Not benchmarks, not charts, just a laptop that feels effortlessly fast all the time.

Design

Quick take: Apple’s familiar design remains elegant, portable, and surprisingly difficult to fault.

If you’ve seen a MacBook Air released at any point over the last three years, you’ve already seen the MacBook Air M5.

That’s not necessarily a criticism. Apple landed on a winning design back in 2022 when it introduced the M2 MacBook Air, and the company has spent the years since doing what Apple does best: changing almost nothing and hoping nobody notices. To be fair, when the design is this good, it’s difficult to argue with the strategy.

My review unit is the 15-inch model in Sky Blue, and I genuinely think it is the colour to get. Depending on the lighting, it shifts between silver and a subtle metallic blue. It is understated enough to take into a boardroom, but distinctive enough that you won’t immediately lose track of it among a sea of silver laptops in a coffee shop.

The chassis itself remains carved from aluminium and feels every bit as premium as you’d expect from a laptop at this price point. The flat surfaces and rounded edges strike a nice balance between modern and comfortable. Four years into this design language, it still looks elegant, even if it no longer turns heads the way it once did.

Then there is the notch.

Look, I know some people stopped noticing it years ago. I haven’t. Every time I open the lid, my eyes go straight to that little black chunk hanging down from the top of the display. Apple insists it is there to house the webcam. I understand the reasoning. I still don’t like it. It is the only part of the MacBook Air’s design that feels like a compromise rather than a deliberate choice.

Port selection remains functional rather than exciting. On the left side, you’ll find MagSafe charging alongside two Thunderbolt 4 ports. The right side gets a solitary 3.5mm headphone jack, which feels a bit lonely over there.

My biggest complaint is one I’ve had for years. I wish Apple would place a USB-C port on either side of the laptop. MagSafe is excellent and remains one of Apple’s smartest features, but giving users the flexibility to plug accessories or chargers into either side would make daily life just a little easier. Instead, you’re still occasionally doing the awkward desk dance where the cable is on the wrong side, and you’re trying to convince yourself it doesn’t bother you.

The real magic of the MacBook Air, though, is how little you notice it when carrying it around. Even the larger 15-inch model feels absurdly thin and light. Sliding it into a backpack almost feels like you’ve forgotten to pack a laptop at all. The fanless design helps here, allowing Apple to keep the profile remarkably slim without sacrificing rigidity.

And somehow, despite having no fan whatsoever, the M5 chip barely seems to care. Whether I’m juggling browser tabs, editing photos, writing, streaming music, or bouncing between half a dozen apps at once, the MacBook Air remains cool, quiet, and completely unbothered. No noise, no drama, no sudden bursts of fan activity.

Just effortless performance wrapped in one of the best laptop designs Apple has ever produced.

Score: 9/10

Display

Quick take: A sharp, colour-accurate display that prioritises consistency over OLED flashiness.

Apple may call it a Liquid Retina display, but what you’re actually getting is a 13.6-inch IPS panel with a resolution of 2560 x 1664 and a standard 60Hz refresh rate. The screen is technically larger than its “13-inch” branding suggests, and that extra space is immediately noticeable when compared to smaller ultraportables.

It’s also a very Apple display in the best possible sense.

The MacBook Air’s panel is sharp enough that text looks printed onto the screen rather than rendered on it. Whether you’re writing documents, editing photos, or spending your afternoon with an unhealthy number of browser tabs open, everything looks crisp and clean.

Watching the recently released Spider-Man: Brand New Day trailer proved to be a particularly good showcase for the display. Spider-Man’s bright red-and-blue suit stood out vividly against darker cityscapes, while shadow-heavy scenes retained plenty of detail. The colors looked rich without feeling exaggerated, which is something Apple continues to do better than many rivals.

Part of that experience comes from Apple’s True Tone technology, which automatically adjusts the display’s colour temperature based on ambient lighting conditions. It sounds like a gimmick until you spend a few days using it. Then every other display starts looking slightly off.

The MacBook Air’s display is also surprisingly colour accurate. In our usage, it delivers excellent coverage of both the DCI-P3 and sRGB colour spaces, putting it remarkably close to the more expensive MacBook Pro in terms of colour reproduction. For photographers, content creators, and anyone who cares about accurate colors, that’s impressive considering the Air uses a standard LED panel rather than the mini-LED technology found on Apple’s professional machines.

Of course, there’s one aspect of the display that remains divisive: the notch.

Nestled into the top of the screen, the notch houses the webcam and cuts into the menu bar. If you’re seeing it for the first time, it can look a little odd, particularly in light mode where the black cutout stands out against brighter backgrounds.

The good news is that the practical impact is almost nonexistent. Apple effectively uses the area above the traditional display boundary for the menu bar, meaning you still get a full 16:10 workspace below it. In other words, you’re not losing screen real estate. You’re actually gaining some.

And when you’re watching films or YouTube videos, the notch mostly disappears from view because most content doesn’t extend into that section of the display anyway.

The only real criticism is that OLED displays are becoming increasingly common on premium Windows laptops. Those panels still offer deeper blacks and more dramatic contrast than Apple’s IPS technology can match.

Even so, the MacBook Air’s display remains one of the best laptop screens available today. It is bright, sharp, colour accurate, and comfortable to use for hours at a time. It may not have the visual fireworks of OLED, but it gets almost everything else right.

Score: 9/10

Keyboard, trackpad, and speakers

Quick take: Apple still sets the benchmark for everyday laptop usability and comfort.

If there’s one area where Apple continues to embarrass much of the laptop industry, it’s the everyday stuff. Not the processor. Not the AI features. The things you interact with hundreds of times every day.

Let’s start with the keyboard.

On paper, the MacBook Air’s keyboard isn’t particularly exciting. Key travel is relatively shallow compared to some traditional laptop keyboards, and mechanical keyboard enthusiasts will probably continue writing angry comments about it until the end of time. But in actual use, it’s excellent.

The layout is logical, spacious, and refreshingly free from unnecessary experimentation. The full-sized function row remains intact, the inverted-T arrow keys are exactly where they should be, and the entire keyboard feels precise and predictable. After a few minutes of typing, it simply disappears beneath your fingers, which is arguably the highest compliment any keyboard can receive.

As someone who spends most of the day staring at a blinking cursor and pretending deadlines don’t exist, I found typing on the MacBook Air genuinely enjoyable.

My only complaint is a surprisingly petty one. Apple has continued its recent obsession with replacing text labels on keys like Tab, Shift, Enter, Caps Lock, and Delete with symbols. The icons are familiar if you’ve spent years using iPhones and iPads, but I still think actual words are clearer. This isn’t a functional problem by any means. Touch typists won’t care. It’s just one of those tiny design decisions that makes me wonder whether someone at Apple is being paid by the glyph.

The power button doubles as a Touch ID sensor and remains one of the most convenient authentication systems available on any laptop. A quick tap and you’re logged in before you’ve had time to remember what your password actually is.

Then there’s the trackpad.

At this point, reviewing Apple’s trackpads feels a bit like reviewing gravity. They’re so consistently good that it’s difficult to find new ways to praise them.

The large glass surface remains among the best in the business. It’s smooth, responsive, and absurdly accurate. More importantly, the haptic feedback system continues to perform its party trick of convincing your brain that you’re physically clicking something when, in reality, you’re not.

Unlike traditional trackpads that hinge from the top, the MacBook Air registers clicks evenly across the entire surface. Whether you’re clicking near the top, bottom, or corner, the experience feels the same. Once you get used to it, many Windows trackpads suddenly feel strangely primitive.

macOS gestures are equally brilliant. Swiping between desktops, launching Mission Control, or zooming with pinch gestures all feel fluid and intuitive. Everything responds instantly, making navigation feel effortless.

The speakers deserve credit, too. Given how impossibly thin the MacBook Air is, the sound quality is genuinely impressive. Music sounds clear and detailed, vocals come through beautifully, and podcasts are crisp enough that you’ll suddenly realize how many people say “um” professionally.

That said, physics remains undefeated. While the four-speaker system delivers plenty of clarity, it can’t quite match the bass response of thicker laptops or Apple’s own MacBook Pro models. Drums sound punchy, but they don’t have the chest-thumping weight that larger speaker systems can produce.

Still, for a laptop this thin, the overall package is remarkably good. The keyboard is excellent, the trackpad remains the industry benchmark, and the speakers are more than capable of handling everything from work calls to late-night Netflix sessions.

In typical Apple fashion, none of these features is flashy. They just work exceptionally well, every single day.

Score: 9/10

Camera

Quick take: The 12MP webcam delivers sharp, natural video quality for every call.

Nestled inside the controversial notch is a 12MP webcam, and thankfully, it’s a genuinely good one.

Video calls on the MacBook Air look sharp, detailed, and natural. During testing, the camera captured everything with impressive clarity, including individual strands of hair and, somewhat less helpfully, every sign that I probably should have gone to bed earlier the night before. The camera is honest, perhaps a little too honest.

Still, that’s exactly what you want from a webcam. Colors look accurate, detail levels are strong, and image quality is comfortably ahead of the grainy, washed-out webcams that continue to plague many Windows laptops.

Apple also includes its Center Stage feature, which automatically tracks and keeps you in frame as you move around during video calls. It’s a clever piece of technology that works surprisingly well, particularly if you’re the sort of person who likes to pace around while talking.

Personally, I rarely make much use of it because my video call strategy consists largely of sitting in one spot and trying not to accidentally leave myself on mute for half the meeting.

For most people, though, Center Stage is a nice bonus rather than a headline feature.

The bigger story is that the MacBook Air’s webcam is simply reliable. Whether you’re jumping into a work meeting, catching up with family, or pretending your camera isn’t on while frantically looking for a document, it delivers consistently excellent image quality with minimal effort required.

Score: 8/10

Software

Quick take: macOS Tahoe refines the experience while Apple’s ecosystem remains unmatched.

The MacBook Air M5 ships with macOS 26 Tahoe, which brings Apple’s biggest visual redesign in years. Whether that’s exciting or mildly concerning depends entirely on how much you enjoy translucent user interfaces.

The headline feature is something Apple calls “Liquid Glass,” a new design language shared across macOS, iOS, and iPadOS. In practice, this means menus, buttons,s and interface elements now have a glass-like appearance that reflects and refracts content behind them. Apple wants it to feel modern and dynamic. Cynics might describe it as the software equivalent of discovering the transparency slider in Photoshop and refusing to stop using it.

When Liquid Glass was first revealed, reactions were mixed. Some people loved the fresh look, while others immediately began demanding Apple dial it back. To the company’s credit, it listened. Several tweaks during the beta period reduced some of the more aggressive visual effects, and the final version feels much more restrained.

Thankfully, macOS seems to be the platform that benefits most from the redesign. While Liquid Glass can occasionally feel a little overenthusiastic on iPhones and iPads, its implementation on the Mac is more subtle. After a few days of use, I largely stopped thinking about it, which is probably the best outcome for any interface redesign.

Beyond the visual refresh, Tahoe introduces several genuinely useful features.

Live Translation is one of the most impressive additions, bringing real-time language translation to Messages and FaceTime conversations. The revamped Phone app also makes its way to the Mac, allowing calls and communication features to feel more integrated across Apple’s ecosystem.

Live Activities finally arrive on macOS as well, giving you quick access to ongoing tasks, deliveries, sports scores, and other real-time information without constantly switching between apps.

Spotlight search has also become smarter and more capable. Long-time Mac users already treat Spotlight as the fastest way to do almost anything, and Tahoe makes it even more useful. The less time spent digging through folders and menus, the better.

One feature that deserves special mention is Clipboard History. It sounds incredibly boring until you need it. Then it instantly becomes one of your favourite additions. Being able to revisit previously copied items saves a surprising amount of time and frustration.

Of course, there is also the elephant in the room: Apple Intelligence.

Last year, Apple made some very ambitious promises about AI-powered Siri features. Most of those features never arrived, and the company spent the following months explaining why they weren’t ready. It wasn’t Apple’s finest moment.

As a result, Tahoe takes a noticeably quieter approach to artificial intelligence. Apple Intelligence is still present, but it no longer dominates every conversation about the operating system. Frankly, that might be for the best.

The real strength of macOS continues to be the ecosystem rather than any single AI feature.

My favourite example remains iPhone Mirroring. The ability to control your iPhone directly from your Mac still feels vaguely like witchcraft. Need a two-factor authentication code? Need to respond to a message? Need something from an app on your phone while that phone is buried somewhere in your house? iPhone Mirroring handles it all without forcing you to leave your desk.

Also, connectivity is future-proof. The MacBook Air’s N1 chip adds support for Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 6, giving it a sense of readiness for the next generation of wireless devices and networks.

And that’s ultimately why macOS Tahoe works. The new design is nice, the AI features are fine, but the real magic remains Apple’s ability to make all of its devices feel like parts of the same machine. Few companies do that better.

Score: 9/10

Battery

Quick take: Dependable all-day battery life means one less thing to worry about.

Battery life continues to be one of the MacBook Air’s greatest strengths, even if it no longer feels quite as magical as it did when Apple Silicon first arrived and collectively made Windows laptop manufacturers very nervous.

In our testing, which included web browsing, video streaming, and some light gaming with the display set to 75 percent brightness, the MacBook Air lasted 13 hours and 28 minutes on a single charge. That’s comfortably enough to get through a full workday without spending half your afternoon hunting for a power socket.

More importantly, the battery life feels dependable. I never found myself nervously checking the battery percentage every hour or lowering screen brightness like a survivalist rationing supplies after the apocalypse. The MacBook Air simply gets on with the job.

And if you do happen to run low, charging is refreshingly straightforward. Apple’s MagSafe connector remains one of the best charging solutions in the business, snapping into place with satisfying ease while also protecting your laptop from an accidental cable yank. Alternatively, you can charge through USB-C if that’s more convenient.

With a charger nearby, whether it’s MagSafe or USB-C, stretching the MacBook Air through an entire day of work is remarkably easy.

In short, battery life isn’t a headline-grabbing feature on the M5 Air. It’s something arguably more valuable: one less thing to worry about.

Score: 9/10

Performance

Quick take: The M5 chip makes an already fast laptop feel even faster.

The new MacBook Air 13 with Apple’s M5 chip feels like Apple is perfecting a formula it already perfected years ago. The base model sounds humble enough on paper (10-core CPU, 8-core GPU, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD), but in day-to-day use, I rarely felt like I was using an “entry-level” machine. Even in my early testing, the laptop handled heavier workloads far better than I would have expected from something so thin and light.

My unit had a 10-core CPU with an 8-core GPU, so GPU performance will obviously vary if you go for the upgraded 10-core GPU option. But the combination of the M5 chip, faster storage, and ample memory makes this MacBook Air feel really fast. This will be more than enough machine for most users and even quite a few professionals.

But what surprised me even more than the raw performance was the overall software experience on macOS Tahoe 2,6 which feels very polished. Apple’s latest OS is rich, well-organized, and deeply integrated into the wider Apple ecosystem. The more Apple devices you have,e the more this laptop starts to feel like the hub of everything.

Also, one gripe we had – Apple needs to ramp up its gaming portfolio, which currently consists of Cyberpunk 2077 and a couple of other games, fewer than the number of fingers you have on one hand.

Liquid Glass provides a more uniform visual style across Apple’s ecosystem, whether you’re moving from an iPhone 17 Pro to the MacBook Air. Fortunately, Apple has toned the effect down a bit on macOS. It still looks modern and fresh, without making the desktop look too shiny or distracting.

The desktop experience itself is still one of the biggest strengths of macOS. I still find features like Stacks very useful in keeping files organized, and I like how widgets can stay in monochrome to minimize distractions. It’s clean without trying too hard to be futuristic.

Where it gets really impressive is in the ecosystem integration. I loved being able to mirror my iPhone directly to the MacBook Air and get phone notifications on the desktop. Universal Control still feels almost unbelievably smooth. I could seamlessly switch my work control between an iPhone and the MacBook sitting side by side without even thinking about it. And for someone coming from Windows stable, this feels like a huge step-up.

Benchmarks and sustained load

Quick take: Benchmark gains are real, but everyday responsiveness is the bigger story.

Moving to benchmarks. The benchmark results indicate the base MacBook Air M5 is far more capable than its thin-and-light design would suggest. In the Blackmagic Disk Speed Test, the SSD managed to hit around 5.4 GB/s reads and 1.1 GB/s writes, which is fast enough for demanding workloads like 4K and even some 8K video editing.

On the other hand, the results on the AmorphousMemoryMark show a very high memory bandwidth, with read speeds over 124GB/s. In real-world use, this translates to zippy multitasking, faster app launches, and smooth handling of heavier creative workloads. Memory and storage performance on the M5 feels surprisingly near pro-level territory for a “Air” machine.

The MacBook Air M5’s benchmark numbers become far more impressive once you compare them with previous MacBook Air generations and modern integrated graphics solutions from the Windows side. In several GPU-focused 3DMark tests, the Air is now performing closer to entry-level gaming laptops than traditional ultraportables.

In Solar Bay, my unit scored 19,975 points at 1440 p.m. For perspective, verified online results show the MacBook Air M4 with a 10-core GPU averaging around 15,570 points in the same test. That means the M5 Air is delivering roughly a 28 percent jump in ray-tracing performance generation over generation. Even more interestingly, AMD’s Radeon 780M integrated graphics – one of the strongest Windows iGPU solutions right now – scores around 11,490 points in Solar Bay, putting the M5 comfortably ahead.

The same trend continues in Steel Nomad Light. My MacBook Air M5 scored 4,462 points, while the M4 GPU averages roughly 4,097 points online. That is not an earth-shattering jump, but it does show Apple steadily widening the gap between the Air and most integrated Windows graphics solutions. The Radeon 780M, for example, averages around 2,662 points in the same benchmark, which means the M5 Air is roughly 67 percent faster here.

The heavier Steel Nomad benchmark is where things become more realistic. My system scored 932 points, while Notebookcheck’s Apple M5 GPU database shows averages closer to 1,098 points. That suggests my 8-core GPU configuration is performing slightly below higher-end M5 variants, but still within the expected range for a fanless machine. By comparison, an M5 MacBook Pro with the 10-core GPU has posted scores around 1,138 points. So while the Air is clearly slower than actively cooled Pro models, the difference is smaller than you might expect.

Wild Life Extreme may be the most impressive result overall. My MacBook Air M5 scored 9,974 points at 4K resolution while running on battery power. Online M4 GPU averages sit around 9,591 points, while some optimized M5 systems reportedly cross 11,000 points. That puts the Air significantly ahead of older Apple Silicon chips like the M2 Pro, which typically scores around 10,955 points despite using a much larger and actively cooled laptop chassis.

The Geekbench 6 results show just how powerful Apple’s M5 chip has become for a thin-and-light laptop. My MacBook Air M5 scored 4,171 in single-core and 16,325 in multi-core CPU performance, putting it well ahead of most ultraportable Windows laptops and even ahead of several older MacBook Pro models. For perspective, the M4 MacBook Air typically scores around 3,800 single-core and 15,000 multi-core, meaning the M5 delivers a noticeable generational jump. GPU performance also looks strong, with an OpenCL score of 40,488. That places the Air comfortably above AMD’s Radeon 780M integrated graphics and close to entry-level discrete GPU territory in some creative workloads.

The benchmark results paint a clear picture: the MacBook Air M5 is no longer just a great ultraportable. It is becoming a genuinely capable performance machine. Apple’s new M5 chip delivers noticeable gains across both CPU and GPU workloads, with the biggest improvements appearing in graphics-focused tests.

In Geekbench 6, the M5 scored 4,171 in single-core and 16,325 in multi-core performance, extending Apple’s lead over competing ultraportable chips from Intel and Qualcomm. These gains may not look dramatic on paper, but they contribute to the Air’s exceptionally responsive everyday experience.

The GPU results are even more impressive. In Solar Bay, the M5’s 8-core GPU scored 19,975 points, roughly 28 percent ahead of the M4 and significantly faster than AMD’s Radeon 780M integrated graphics. Similar trends appear in Steel Nomad Light and Wild Life Extreme, where Apple’s fanless laptop continues to close the gap with entry-level gaming hardware.

What’s most remarkable is that these results come from a silent, fanless machine. The MacBook Air M5 may not replace a gaming laptop or MacBook Pro, but it comfortably delivers some of the strongest performance currently available in the ultraportable category.

No, the MacBook Air M5 is still not competing with RTX 4060 or RTX 4070 gaming laptops. But compared to integrated GPUs like Radeon 780M, older Apple Silicon machines, and even the previous-generation M4 Air, these numbers show Apple’s fanless ultraportable has become a genuinely capable GPU machine for creative work, GPU acceleration, and lighter gaming workloads.

Score: 9/10

Final verdict

The MacBook Air M5 is a slightly frustrating product to review because there isn’t much left for Apple to improve.

The design is largely unchanged, the display remains excellent rather than revolutionary, the keyboard and trackpad continue to lead the industry, and the battery life is comfortably good enough to get through a full day. Even macOS Tahoe, despite its flashy Liquid Glass makeover, feels more like a refinement than a reinvention.

And yet, none of that feels like a criticism.

What Apple has created with the MacBook Air M5 is arguably the most complete mainstream laptop you can buy today. It is thin, light, silent, powerful, exceptionally well-built, and backed by one of the best software ecosystems in the industry. It handles everyday productivity with ease, powers through creative workloads without complaint, and delivers performance levels that would have been considered absurd for a fanless laptop just a few years ago.

The most impressive thing about the M5 MacBook Air isn’t how fast it is. It’s how little you think about its performance. Everything happens instantly. Apps launch without hesitation, multitasking feels effortless, and the laptop never gives you a reason to question whether it can handle the next task.

Sure, I would love an OLED display. I’d happily take an extra USB-C port. And yes, I still dislike the notch.

But those complaints feel minor when viewed against everything else Apple gets right.

The MacBook Air M5 isn’t exciting because it changes everything. It’s impressive because it proves Apple already figured out the formula years ago and continues to refine it.

For most people, this is not just the best MacBook to buy. It’s the best laptop, full stop.

Should you buy it?

Yes. For most people, the answer is remarkably simple: buy the MacBook Air M5 and stop overthinking it.

If you’re upgrading from an Intel MacBook, an M1 MacBook Air, or an ageing Windows laptop, the improvement will be immediately noticeable. You’ll get exceptional battery life, near-instant responsiveness, a fantastic keyboard and trackpad, excellent build quality, and a level of polish that very few Windows laptops can consistently match.

It’s also powerful enough that most buyers won’t come close to finding its limits. Whether you’re a student, office worker, content creator, programmer, or someone who simply wants a premium laptop that lasts for years, the M5 Air has more than enough performance in reserve.

The only people who should think twice are existing M3 or M4 MacBook Air owners. The M5 is faster, but not dramatically so. If your current Air is doing everything you need, upgrading purely for benchmark gains makes very little sense.

Similarly, professional video editors, 3D artists, and users running sustained heavy workloads may still be better served by a MacBook Pro with active cooling and a more powerful GPU configuration.

Everyone else can safely ignore benchmark charts and spec-sheet debates.

The base 13-inch MacBook Air M5 with 16GB RAM and 512GB storage hits a sweet spot that feels unusually difficult to fault. It offers enough performance to satisfy enthusiasts, enough simplicity to please casual users, and enough longevity to remain relevant for years.

In a market full of laptops that excel in one area while compromising somewhere else, the MacBook Air M5 stands out because it compromises remarkably little.

Buy it, use it, and spend the next five years worrying about something more important than laptop performance.

Alternatives you can try

If you’re considering alternatives to the MacBook Air M5, there are a few standout options depending on what matters most to you.

The 15-inch MacBook Air M5 is the obvious alternative within Apple’s own lineup. It delivers the same excellent performance, battery life, and fanless design as the 13-inch model, but with a larger display and improved speaker system. For users who spend long hours working on documents, spreadsheets, or creative projects, the extra screen space can be well worth the added cost.

The Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 takes a different approach, focusing on AI-powered features, a premium design, and impressive battery life. Its high-quality display and comfortable keyboard make it one of the best Windows laptops available, although ARM app compatibility can still be a consideration for some users.

Meanwhile, the LG Gram remains a compelling choice for anyone who prioritises portability. Despite offering larger display options, it stays remarkably lightweight and includes a generous selection of ports. Battery life is excellent, and its ultra-light design makes it particularly appealing for frequent travellers.

What makes the MacBook Air M5 stand out is its balance. It may not have the largest display or the most ports, but few laptops combine performance, battery life, build quality, silent operation, and ecosystem integration as successfully. It doesn’t dominate every category – it simply gets almost everything right.

How we tested it

I used the MacBook Air M5 as my primary laptop for over two weeks, relying on it exactly as most buyers would. During that time, it handled everything from writing and research to photo editing, media consumption, video calls, and the endless browser tabs that somehow become part of every workday.

The laptop travelled with me between home, café,s and workspaces, spending time both plugged in and running exclusively on battery power. Testing wasn’t limited to synthetic benchmarks or controlled workloads. Instead, I focused on understanding how the MacBook Air performs in real-world conditions where responsiveness, reliability, and battery life matter more than benchmark scores.

Daily usage included multitasking across Safari, Apple Music, productivity apps, messaging platforms, and cloud-based tools. I also spent time watching videos, testing the speakers, participating in video calls, and evaluating the overall macOS Tahoe experience.

The goal was simple: to find out whether the MacBook Air M5 remains the laptop most people should buy. Rather than treating it as a test device, I actually purchased it as my everyday computer and judged it on how well it disappeared into daily life while getting work done.

Billy Joel insisted that Vienna waits for you. HIGH END Vienna 2026 apparently did not get the memo. He just never had to cover a European hi-fi show that crammed four days of product launches, meetings, €100,000 loudspeakers, and breathless claims of “redefining the category” into an industrial conference center with the emotional warmth of airport security.

eCoustics came out of HIGH END Vienna 2026 with more than 55 articles and videos from the show floor and the increasingly chaotic world around it. Chris Boylan was a machine in Vienna and worked like a dog, covering the show from the inside while the rest of us held down the digital fort from afar.

Robert Silva and I kept the news and analysis moving remotely, chasing launches, press material, photos, pricing, and the inevitable claims that some very expensive box had finally delivered more pleasure than a properly pounded Wiener schnitzel and a cold Grüner Veltliner.

The summer calendar is apparently not interested in letting anyone recover. T.H.E. Show SoCal, CanJam London, and CanJam SoCal are still ahead, and there is more Vienna analysis to come once we separate the genuinely important launches from the usual expensive furniture with binding posts.

But first, a short trip across the border to Germany, because Rush Fifty Something has Anika Nilles behind the kit, and this is the sort of continental segue Basil Fawlty would have ruined before the first cymbal crash.

Rush Fifty Something: Beyond the Professor

Some people are going to hate Rush Fifty Something. Good. Grief is not a veto on the living.

Neil Peart died on January 7, 2020, at 67, after a private three-and-a-half-year battle with glioblastoma. He was not simply Rush’s drummer. He was its primary lyricist, its intellectual and spiritual center, and the man fans affectionately called The Professor. The idea of Geddy Lee and Alex Lifeson returning to a stage without him once seemed unthinkable. For a lot of people, it probably still does.

My late Bubie and ZsaZsa were survivors of Auschwitz and Bergen-Belsen. In the family history passed down to me, their paths crossed with Geddy Lee’s parents during the war and again in the displaced-persons world that followed liberation. That was never some abstract footnote from another continent. It was part of the emotional geography of growing up Jewish in Toronto’s Bathurst Manor, where survival, silence, stubbornness, and starting over in Canada were not concepts.

Geddy’s parents had met in the forced-labor system around Starachowice before both were sent to Auschwitz. They were separated there. His mother was later transferred to Bergen-Belsen, while his father survived a succession of camps and went looking for her after liberation. He found her at the Bergen-Belsen displaced persons camp; they married there and eventually came to Canada. Their son grew up to become Geddy Lee.

So no, my attachment to Rush was never accidental. Canada’s greatest rock trio came from the same Toronto, the same postwar Jewish immigrant world, and the same understanding that survival was not the end of the story. It was the beginning of one.

That is why this tour matters. Rush Fifty Something is not an attempt to replace Neil Peart, because that would be both impossible and insulting. It is Geddy and Alex deciding that the music, the friendship, and the audience are still worth carrying forward. Anika Nilles has been handed one of the most impossible jobs in rock music: not becoming The Professor, but walking into a room full of people who still miss him and making the case for what comes next.

So how did she do? By every credible account so far, Anika Nilles exceeded expectations and then drove over them in a German-engineered Leopard tank.

For the inevitable haters: do you honestly believe Geddy and Lerxst, two men who have spent five decades obsessing over arrangements, tones, transitions, dynamics, and whether a single note is sitting correctly inside a 7/8 passage, would have picked just anyone to sit behind Neil Peart-inspired kit? This is Rush, not a casino tribute act with a guy named “Derek” who learned “Tom Sawyer” from YouTube between shifts at Guitar Center. Don’t let him date your sister.

Nilles had already played with Jeff Beck in 2022. That is not a participation trophy. Beck did not hire people because they could execute a flashy fill and look comfortable under stage lights. She walked into the Kia Forum in Inglewood, one of the most intimidating rooms in rock, facing a crowd that knows every ghost note, every fill, every cymbal placement, and every microscopic deviation from the gospel according to Peart.

And she crushed it.

The most impressive part was not that she could play the parts. Plenty of drummers can play the parts. She understood the feel, the tension, the odd little pushes and pulls that make Rush sound like Rush rather than a prog-rock transcription exercise. She did not try to impersonate Neil Peart, because that would have been embarrassing for everyone involved. She honored the architecture and brought her own power, confidence, and musical intelligence to it.

As for Gershon, let’s be honest. Geddy is still musically locked in. The bass playing remains ridiculous, the keyboard work is sharp, and the instincts are intact. But the voice is older, because Geddy Lee is older. There are moments where he has to work harder for the range and force that once came as naturally as breathing. That is not a betrayal. It is biology.

Nilles, by comparison, looked and sounded fearless. On the evidence of the opening shows, she was not merely good enough for Rush. She may have been the most startling thing on that stage.

The Pitt: Television Still Knows How to Hurt

The past few weeks have been a brutal mix of highs and lows.

On the high side, the eCoustics team did remarkable work covering HIGH END Vienna 2026.

The low has been far more personal. My father-in-law and my father, who has fought a long and courageous battle with Parkinson’s disease, have been in different hospitals in different parts of the country. One is doing better, though not completely out of the woods. The other has reached the point where the fight becomes something else entirely.

It has been a lot to carry behind the scenes. Parkinson’s is a vicious disease. It takes its time, strips away things in small increments, and asks families to keep adapting while pretending this is somehow a normal way to live. Watching it happen to someone you love feels profoundly unfair.

Which brings me to one piece of advice: never start a new television series on an iPad at an airport gate at 11 p.m. on a Sunday night, especially when that series is The Pitt.

Created by R. Scott Gemmill and starring Noah Wyle as Dr. Michael “Robby” Robinavitch, The Pitt is set inside the fictional Pittsburgh Trauma Medical Center, where every episode covers roughly an hour of one punishing 15-hour emergency-room shift. That sounds like a clever formal device until you are five episodes in and realize the show has eliminated every escape hatch television usually provides.

There is no reset button. No comforting cut to the next day. No swelling score telling you exactly when to feel something. The alarms, overhead pages, clipped conversations, machines, blood, exhaustion, and occasional dead silence become the soundtrack.

Patients do not exist to teach a tidy lesson before the credits roll. They arrive scared, angry, dying, already dead, or simply caught in the machinery of an American healthcare system that appears designed by people who have never waited six hours under fluorescent lighting for someone to tell them whether a child is going to make it through the night.

That is why The Pitt feels so much more intense than most medical television, even if it is not a documentary. Family members who actually work in emergency rooms and operating rooms have pointed out that some of its largest, brightest, save-the-patient-now interventions are television medicine: in real life, an open craniotomy for a traumatic brain bleed is not something you casually perform under trauma-bay lights while somebody yells for more O-negative. When possible, that patient is headed upstairs to an operating room with an actual surgical team.

Those adjustments are television, not fraud. The show still understands the thing most medical dramas miss: the pace, the interruptions, the emotional whiplash, and the brutal requirement to move from one patient’s worst moment to the next person waiting for help.

It forces you to stay in the room. It makes you wait with families, listen to doctors explain things they do not want to explain, and watch nurses carry on because there are still twelve other people who need them. The cumulative amount of death is a lot to handle. Even for me. It is paperwork, exhaustion, panic, unfinished sentences, and the terrible realization that the rest of the world keeps moving while yours has stopped.

Abdullah Ibrahim Was South Africa’s Musical Soul

Abdullah Ibrahim was one of South Africa’s great musical souls: a pianist, composer, exile, survivor, and quiet revolutionary whose music carried Cape Town, District Six, church hymns, marabi, Ellington, Monk, and the long shadow of apartheid without ever turning into a lecture.

My love of his music comes from a deeper and somewhat inexplicable connection to South Africa: childhood friends, memories that stuck, and a strange, enduring longing for Cape Town that will never entirely go away. A plate filled with biltong that should never be consumed alone. Ibrahim’s music always felt like part of that pull. Not postcard South Africa. Something more complicated, bruised, beautiful, spiritual, and alive.

Born Adolph Johannes Brand in Cape Town in 1934 and first known internationally as Dollar Brand, Ibrahim helped shape modern South African jazz with the Jazz Epistles before leaving a country that made it very difficult for Black genius to breathe. Duke Ellington helped open the international door, but Ibrahim walked through it on his own terms. He died in Germany on June 15 at age 91, leaving South Africa without one of its most essential cultural voices.

His music could be spare, spiritual, defiant, tender, and deeply South African in ways that did not need translation. “Mannenberg” became an anti-apartheid anthem for a reason; it sounds like a people refusing to disappear. Start with Jazz Epistle Verse One, Duke Ellington Presents the Dollar Brand Trio, African Piano, Mannenberg Is Where It’s Happening, Water from an Ancient Well, Cape Town Flowers, and Senzo. That is not homework. That is a map.

Related Reading:

PERSONAL TECH

Redmond manages to break replying to an email on Outlook for macOS, one of the most basic functions

Microsoft has managed to break a very basic Outlook function – the ability to include the previous email in a reply.

The issue, which afflicts Outlook for Mac, was introduced in version 16.110, build 26061317, which rolled out to users last week. Before the update, the original message appeared in the reply window. After the update, nothing.

One affected user said: “It makes it impossible to have a proper email thread because the recipient can’t see the conversation history.”

Another remarked: “This is an extremely frustrating bug in this last update, and I hope a fix is on the way. This is frankly quite disappointing that something major like this completely evaded the software testing process before it was being rolled out.”

The solution, according to one of Microsoft’s forum moderators, is to roll back to a previous version and turn off auto-updating until a fix is released. Great for users in full control of their devices – not so good for anyone with a managed device. Administrators with fleets of Macs running Outlook should brace for helpdesk tickets.

In some instances, having a user copy and paste the salient bits of the email they are responding to might not be such a bad thing. We’ve all had emails that required epic amounts of scrolling to find what started the conversation, so forcing users to think about what they actually need to include is no bad thing. However, disrupting user workflows without warning – well, that is undoubtedly a bad thing.

This is, after all, one of the most basic things an email client needs to do, so shipping a product with a bug that breaks this functionality says more about Microsoft’s approach to quality than anything else.

The Register asked Microsoft for its take on the matter, but the tech behemoth has yet to respond.

Microsoft has already delivered a kicking to Apple hardware users in recent weeks. Office 2019 will cease to be useful on the platform in July, or enter a “reduced functionality mode” in Microspeak, with the only option available to users keen to remain Office customers being an upgrade.

However, as this latest bug demonstrates, running Microsoft’s latest and greatest carries its own risks. ®

Engineers have watched robots master welding seams and pallet stacking for decades. Success on those jobs rarely translates when the task involves something fragile and slightly different every time. An egg in a carton or on a counter represents the exact kind of object that exposes the limits. Too much force cracks the shell. Too little lets it slip. Slight variations in shape, weight distribution, or surface texture throw off systems built around fixed gripper designs or basic vision.

ABB Robotics and PSYONIC, the companies behind the Ability Hand prosthetic, have now taken a different approach. This partnership begins in the very real world, where lab models and scripted demonstrations simply cannot compete. Many people already utilize the Ability Hand in their daily lives, over 100s to be exact. These devices really capture real-world touch, pressure changes, and grip alterations as users go about their regular tasks, such as washing dishes, sifting through clothes, or simply playing with a sensitive object.

The Ability Hand is practically packed with pressure sensors in the right places on the fingers, as well as a full vibration feedback system that tells the user when they’re in contact and how much pressure is being applied. It’s not just about having the right grip; you also need to feel it, so if you’re juggling a coffee mug and a raspberry, you’ll know exactly how much pressure you need to keep the mug safe without squishing the raspberry. Don’t even get me started on slippery objects, which is exactly what prosthesis users have contributed to the discussion: real-world data on time, force levels, finger placements, and movement speed.

Researchers typically teach robots using gloves, virtual reality sets, or simply watching video after video, to mention a few standard training methods. They’re okay, I suppose, but they mostly just tell you where the fingers ended up, and that’s the point, because it’s the little details that really matter, such as the sensation of exactly how much pressure you’re applying and how different textures feel under your fingers. That’s what these prosthetic users have provided…the missing layer of understanding,

ABB has put an Ability Hand on their GoFa robot arm to allow for unlimited testing and improvement. The GoFa side provides the industrial accuracy and accurate measurement of forces and positions that they require, and all of the data from human use is then fed back in to tell them how the robot version should behave. The really clever part is that it’s the same hand design on both sides, so transferring this learned behavior is simple, and engineers can take the knowledge from all those real interactions and incorporate it into new control approaches that should work much better with new objects or minor changes in conditions.

According to Marc Segura, president of ABB robots, one of the most difficult elements of industrial robots has always been obtaining human dexterity and intrinsic knowledge of how to handle diverse products, which is exactly what this alliance is seeking to address. It’s all part of a bigger effort to create robots that can detect, think, and manage objects with more autonomy in changing environments.