Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

The Chevy Silverado EV is one of the best electric trucks ever built, so why is nobody buying it

Published

on

TL;DR

The Silverado EV offers 410 miles of range and strong reviews but sold only 14,000 units last year as price and towing anxiety keep buyers away.

General Motors sold roughly 14,000 Chevrolet Silverado EVs in the United States and Canada last year, according to GM Authority sales data. The petrol-powered Silverado moves more than ten times that volume in a single quarter. That gap, between what reviewers call one of the best electric trucks on the market and what buyers are actually willing to purchase, captures the central problem facing the American EV truck segment.

The numbers have only gotten worse. Silverado EV sales fell 41 percent year over year in the first quarter of 2026, and GM’s broader EV demand continued to decline into the second quarter. The automaker indefinitely suspended development of its next-generation full-size electric truck and SUV programme earlier this year, and took roughly eight billion dollars in EV-related charges during 2025, including writedowns tied to scrapped production plans and cancelled battery contracts.

On paper, the Silverado EV should be a compelling product. The LT Extended Range trim delivers an estimated 410 miles on a full charge from a 205 kilowatt-hour battery pack, the largest in any production pickup. It comes with GM’s Super Cruise hands-free driving system, a Google-powered infotainment setup, and a list price of roughly $71,000, only about $5,000 above the average transaction price for a full-size pickup, according to CEIC data cited by TechCrunch.

Advertisement

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

The problem is what happens when the truck works like a truck. Towing cuts range by roughly 60 percent, which means a fully loaded Silverado EV might manage around 160 miles before needing a charger. According to Strategic Vision survey data, 75 percent of truck owners tow at most once a year, so for most buyers the penalty is tolerable, but for those who haul regularly it remains a dealbreaker.

Price is the other barrier. The $71,000 LT Extended Range is close to the petrol average, but GM also offers an LT Max Range that costs roughly $20,000 more and adds just 68 miles. At that level, the Silverado EV competes with luxury SUVs rather than work trucks, and the federal tax credit that once softened the blow has expired.

Advertisement

GM is betting that its new lithium-manganese-rich battery chemistry will cut at least $6,000 from battery costs while preserving most of the range, but LMR cells are not expected in trucks until 2028. The Ford F-150 Lightning faces the same cost and range dynamic, and Ram’s electric truck has been delayed repeatedly. The American pickup market generates hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue, but the electric versions remain a rounding error in the sales column, waiting for the cost curve to catch up with the engineering.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Is The Plymouth Superbird Your Dream Car? Here’s What Ones For Sale Might Cost You

Published

on





When it comes to dream cars, many people go with vintage muscle cars like the Plymouth Superbird. Named in honor of its Roadrunner twin, the Superbird was once a beast on the racetrack in NASCAR thanks to Richard Petty. It is still around for those collectors wanting to own one but be prepared: You’ll be paying anywhere from $200,000 to over $300,000 or more.

The locations of these cars are random, spread out across the U.S., and listed for sale with various engine and transmission combinations. For example, a green Superbird with a 440 6-pack and 4-speed in Texas is priced on the lower end at $214,900. But on the extreme opposite end, a white automatic Superbird with a 440ci V8 in Indiana was taken off the market after reaching a high bid of $550,000 at auction. An earlier asking price of just under $700,000 failed to result in a sale. Some of the listings are featured on more than one site, including a blue automatic with a 440-engine rated at 375 horsepower in Illinois for $281,998.

The reason the Plymouth Superbird breaks the bank for many car buyers is mostly because of how rare it is. Plymouth built a limited number of Superbirds in 1970. Because of this, they can be difficult to find in original or well-preserved condition. It’s also considered a collector’s item because of its recognizable rear wing, which is part of the vehicle’s factory design.

Advertisement

From NASCAR to Hollywood and beyond

The 1970 Plymouth Superbird was built during a time when manufacturers were experimenting with aerodynamic designs to gain an advantage on the racetrack. Though it originated from the Road Runner platform, the Superbird featured a new and reshaped front end, along with extended bodywork for high-speed stability. Unlike other muscle car designs that often failed to dominate on the track, it was highly effective and pushed the envelope for NASCAR at that time.

But even as it made its mark in racing, the Plymouth Superbird was banned by NASCAR. Citing concerns over driver safety, NASCAR implemented new regulations with the intention of slowing cars down. These regulations also included tough limits on engine displacement, and weight adjustments on larger engines. Because of these changes, the Superbird, along with other aerodynamically designed cars, would no longer be able to hit the 200-mph mark. As a result, the program came to an end.

Advertisement

But even after its departure from NASCAR, the Superbird went on to become a highly sought-after muscle car for collectors. Thanks to its unique design, it also became a standout in Hollywood, appearing in movies like Pixar’s “Cars,” and “Gone in 60 Seconds,” the film that also featured a 1967 Mustang called Eleanor. Today, the Superbird’s legacy is that of a fast, memorable, legendary ride that continues to turn heads decades after its introduction.



Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

I was in love with my iPhone Air, until summer arrived

Published

on

When Apple unveiled the iPhone Air, I knew immediately it would be my next phone. I have always loved small phones, and I stretched my iPhone 13 mini for as long as possible. But it struggled to keep up with my usage, so I had to upgrade. 

Since Apple no longer makes a small iPhone, the slim iPhone seemed like the right choice at the time. And honestly, it worked out well. While the iPhone Air is not as easy to handle as an iPhone mini, it is one-handable thanks to its slim profile and lower weight. 

I also got to enjoy the benefits of a larger screen, which makes it better for browsing the web and reading books. Everything was going great until the summer hit, and now I am not so sure. 

Life was good, until it got too hot

Before summer showed up, my time with the iPhone Air was genuinely great. As I mentioned in a previous article, the only real complaint I have was the absence of a telephoto lens. Everything else about the phone, including the size, the weight, and the one-handed usability, felt like a win.

Advertisement

Then the temperature climbed past 45 degrees Celsius (113 degrees Fahrenheit), and things took a turn. Since Apple crammed all the internals into the top of the iPhone Air to make room for a larger battery, that part of the phone turns into a furnace once it’s hot outside. I mean, genuinely uncomfortable to hold. I have gotten the “iPhone needs to cool down” warning screen more times this summer than I have in years of using iPhones.

The bigger issue, though, is the phone’s battery life, and it has fallen off a cliff. Before the heat wave, getting through a full day on a single charge was easy. Now, I have to charge it at least twice a day just to keep up. For a phone I picked specifically because of how effortlessly it fit into my day, that’s a rough trade to be making.

Why heat is your phone battery’s worst enemy

Heat is the enemy of the battery. It comes down to basic chemistry. Lithium-ion batteries rely on chemical reactions to store and release power, and heat speeds those reactions up. The faster they go, the quicker your battery drains, and the more permanent damage builds over time. 

According to a WSJ article, both Apple and Samsung actually agree that once your phone’s surroundings hit around 95 degrees Fahrenheit for extended periods, your battery will incur irreversible damage. Since the current ambient temperatures are rising well above 100 degrees Fahrenheit, my iPhone Air doesn’t stand a chance. 

What you can do to prevent heat damage to your phone’s battery

You can take several steps to prevent heat damage to your phone’s battery. First, keep your phone out of direct sunlight and away from hot cars, since even the glove compartment can turn into an oven. 

Second, if your phone is already hot, resist the urge to stash your phone in the fridge or freezer to cool it down. Instead, use something like a frozen ice pack wrapped in a towel and let it cool down gradually. 

Also, charging is another factor. Fast charging generates heat, so if you’re already in a hot environment, that combination speeds up battery wear even more. If you want to play it safe, slower charging is easier on your battery long term, even if it’s less convenient. 

In short, if you want your phone’s battery to last longer during a summer heatwave, avoid using it in direct sunlight, do not use fast or wireless charging, and let your phone cool down if you feel it getting hot, even before your phone gives you a warning.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How Melbourne AI Energy Systems Tackle Demand

Published

on

This article is brought to you by Melbourne Convention Bureau (MCB) supported by Business Events Australia.

As artificial intelligence accelerates global demand for compute, a parallel constraint is emerging with equal urgency: energy.

From hyperscale data centers to electrified industries, AI is driving a step change in electricity demand. This is not a future challenge, it is a present, system-level issue requiring coordinated action across energy, infrastructure, and engineering disciplines.

Around the world, the question is no longer whether AI will scale, but whether energy systems can scale with it.

Advertisement

Melbourne, Australia is moving beyond participation to become a globally connected leader helping define how these challenges are addressed.

A national challenge with global implications

Australia’s ambition to lead in artificial intelligence is sharpening focus on the infrastructure required to support it. Data centers are projected to account for up to 11 percent of the nation’s electricity consumption by 2035, placing increasing pressure on generation, transmission, and system reliability.

At the same time, insight from the IEEE Power and Energy Society (PES) highlights that meeting energy demand from AI and digital infrastructure is one of the most significant challenges facing engineers over the next decade.

The implications are clear. In addition to computing challenges, AI poses major energy systems challenges.

Advertisement

“As artificial intelligence continues to scale globally, the challenge is no longer just computational power, it is the energy systems required to support it” —Professor Thas (Ampalavanapillai) Nirmalathas, University of Melbourne

Why Melbourne is leading on the global stage

Victoria has developed one of the most advanced and integrated energy ecosystems in Australia and globally, spanning renewable generation, battery storage, grid modernization, and advanced materials.

What distinguishes Melbourne globally is how these capabilities are connected and applied at system scale.

The city brings together world class engineering research, a rapidly evolving clean energy sector, advanced digital infrastructure, and strong alignment between government, industry, and academia. This convergence is critical in the AI era, where energy, networks and computing systems must be designed together.

Advertisement

Victoria’s coordinated investment across these areas is positioning Melbourne not only as a national leader, but also as a reference point in the global energy system transformation.

Engineering the systems behind the AI economy

The challenge ahead is that generating more power won’t be enough, as engineers need to design systems that respond dynamically to new patterns of demand.

Three priorities are emerging globally:

  • Aligning data center development with grid capacity and renewable supply
  • Embedding flexibility through storage, demand response, and system optimization
  • Balancing digital growth with decarbonization and long-term reliability

Addressing these priorities requires engineering expertise to be embedded earlier in planning ensuring energy systems, digital infrastructure, and policy are designed in parallel.

Melbourne’s strength lies in its ability to integrate this expertise across research, infrastructure, and real-world application.

Advertisement

Crowd mingling in a modern glass courtyard during an outdoor social event Melbourne Connect is a University of Melbourne–led innovation precinct, supported by government and industry, designed to bring together research, business and policy to deliver real-world solutions.Atlantic Group

Research leadership shaping global solutions

At the centre of this capability is the University of Melbourne, where interdisciplinary research is advancing the systems required to support AI driven energy demand.

Through the Melbourne Energy Institute, for example, researchers are examining how energy technologies interact across entire systems from generation and networks through to end use.

“As artificial intelligence continues to scale globally, the challenge is no longer just computational power, it is the energy systems required to support it,” says Professor Thas (Ampalavanapillai) Nirmalathas, Dean of the Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology at the University of Melbourne.

“This is driving a new level of convergence between digital infrastructure and power systems engineering, where integrated, system level thinking is essential.”

Advertisement

Converging energy, networks and AI

Melbourne’s leadership is further strengthened by world-class interdisciplinary facilities such as the Smart Grid Lab in the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, which enables real-time simulation of power systems, allowing engineers to test how solar, batteries, electric vehicles and other distributed resources interact within future grids. This supports the design of more resilient, efficient energy systems before they are deployed at scale.

Control room with server racks, workstations, and a large grid monitoring display. Melbourne’s Smart Grid Lab in the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering enables real-time simulation of power systems. University of Melbourne

These capabilities will become increasingly important as data centers are integrated into the grid.

“AI driven demand is not only increasing computing requirements, but also placing new pressures on underlying energy systems,” says Glen Farivar, Senior Lecturer in Power Electronics at the University of Melbourne. “Designing these systems together is essential to achieving both performance and sustainability outcomes.”

This reflects a critical shift. Future infrastructure must be co designed across energy and digital systems, not developed in isolation.

Advertisement

A living ecosystem delivering real-world outcomes

Victoria’s broader energy ecosystem is translating these insights into practice.

Investment in renewable energy, grid infrastructure and storage is enabling higher levels of clean energy while maintaining reliability. Battery deployment is supporting the flexibility needed to manage both renewable variability and growing AI-driven demand.

At its core, Melbourne offers an integrated environment where research, industry and government collaborate to solve complex system challenges.

Why engineering collaboration matters

Solving the energy demands of the AI era cannot be achieved in isolation.

Advertisement

It requires engineers, researchers, utilities, and policymakers to work together earlier and more often. More than ever, engineering collaboration is a critical enabler of future energy systems.

Environments that bring together global expertise are becoming essential to how solutions are designed and delivered.

“Developing future energy systems that are affordable, sustainable, and resilient is a truly grand challenge” —Professor Pierluigi Mancarella, University of Melbourne

In this context, the University of Melbourne is co-leading, alongside Johns Hopkins University and Imperial College London, one of only seven Global Centres in Climate Change and Clean Energy. Through the Electric Power Innovation for a Carbon Free Society (EPICS) Centre, the University is also the Australian technical lead in advancing future energy systems, with EPICS the only Global Centre focused on future energy infrastructure.

Advertisement

Large solar farm in green fields with wind turbines on the horizon under blue sky The new Electric Power Innovation for a Carbon-Free Society (EPICS) Centre will address challenges in clean energy production and storage.University of Melbourne

“Developing future energy systems that are affordable, sustainable, and resilient is a truly grand challenge,” says Professor Pierluigi Mancarella, Chair Professor of Electrical Power Systems at the University of Melbourne and Australian director and international co-director of EPICS.

“As electricity grids are increasingly becoming the backbone of future energy systems, optimizing their interactions with other sectors, including AI and digitalization, and fostering interdisciplinary and international collaborations are essential,” he adds.

Global conferences as part of the solution

International conferences are increasingly recognized as critical platforms for advancing engineering solutions at scale. Melbourne’s ability to convene global expertise is central to its leadership.

In 2027, the city will host the IEEE PES Generation Transmission and Distribution (GTD) Asia 2027 Conference and Exposition, bringing together engineers, utilities, researchers and policymakers from across the world to address the challenges shaping the future of power systems.

Advertisement

Four men pose at a 2025 GTD conference booth with energy-themed backdrop. IEEE PES GTD Asia 2027 Melbourne Committee (left to right): Dr. Mehdi Ghazavi Dozein (Monash University), Dr. Glen Farivar & Professor Pierluigi Mancarella (University of Melbourne) , Dr. Mohammad Mohammadi (Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO)).MCB

“Melbourne offers a unique environment where world-class research, industry capability and policy leadership come together,” notes the IEEE PES GTD Asia 2027 Local Organising Committee, which includes Professor Pierluigi Mancarella and Dr. Glen Farivar from the University of Melbourne, as well as Dr. Mehdi Ghazavi Dozein of Monash University and Dr. Mohammad Mohammadi of the Australian Energy Market Operator.

“Hosting this event creates an opportunity to advance global collaboration on the systems and technologies required to deliver the energy transition at scale.”

These forums enable knowledge exchange, standards development and interdisciplinary collaboration, accelerating progress on complex engineering challenges.

Two people view a circular digital art installation of glowing screens and green light. Attendees view a digital installation at AIME 2025 at Melbourne Connect.MCB

Why Melbourne, and why now

As AI, electrification and digital infrastructure converge, the future of global energy systems will depend on the ability of engineers to collaborate and innovate at scale.

Advertisement

Melbourne provides a proven platform for that collaboration, combining world-class research, a rapidly evolving energy ecosystem, and the infrastructure to connect global expertise.

Group standing with award outside historic brick building and garden walkway Melbourne Convention Bureau, IEEE Communications Society, and University of Melbourne Representatives.University of Melbourne

For IEEE members, hosting a conference in Melbourne is more than an event decision.

It is an opportunity to engage with a globally connected engineering community and contribute directly to solving one of the most significant challenges facing the profession today.

Through the support of the Melbourne Convention Bureau, professionals can access tailored, free support to bid for and deliver international conferences, bringing global expertise together in a city actively shaping the future of energy systems.

Advertisement

To explore hosting your next conference in Melbourne, contact the Melbourne Convention Bureau at info@melbournecb.com.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft unveils $2.5B ‘Frontier Company’ to embed AI engineers inside customers

Published

on

Satya Nadella says the industry shouldn’t “cede value to a few models that eat everything they see.” (GeekWire File Photo / Kevin Lisota)

Microsoft is launching a new AI “company.” It won’t be a separate legal entity, and most of its 6,000 people already work at Microsoft. But the $2.5 billion behind it is real, and the stakes are big, given how many of its AI partners and rivals are racing to do basically the same thing. 

The tech giant on Thursday announced “The Microsoft Frontier Company,” which will embed engineers inside customers to build and run AI systems. It will be led by Rodrigo Kede Lima, a longtime Microsoft sales and enterprise leader, most recently president of Microsoft Asia.

This practice is known in the industry as forward-deployed engineering, in which a company sends its own technical employees to work inside a customer’s operations to design, build, deploy and operate AI systems on-site rather than selling a tool and walking away. 

The model was pioneered two decades ago by Palantir, but in recent months the approach has become the hot new thing in enterprise AI. Amazon committed $1 billion to its own forward-deployed engineering initiative just two days ago. (Some inside Microsoft suspect that its rival may have caught wind of what it was planning and moved to announce first.) 

Anthropic and OpenAI launched rival ventures in May to put engineers inside enterprise customers. Unlike Microsoft’s initiative, the OpenAI Deployment Company, as the ChatGPT maker’s venture is known, is an actual standalone entity — majority-owned by OpenAI but backed by more than $4 billion from a partnership led by the private-equity firm TPG. 

Advertisement

Similarly, Anthropic teamed with Goldman Sachs, Blackstone and Hellman & Friedman on a $1.5 billion venture — not yet named — to embed engineers inside mid-sized companies, starting with the investment firms’ own portfolio businesses.

Microsoft is attempting to one-up them all. 

“This goes beyond what has been labeled as Forward Deployed Engineering (FDE) and will be the largest, most capable, outcome-driven engineering organization in the industry,” wrote Judson Althoff, CEO of Microsoft’s commercial business, in a post announcing the new initiative Thursday morning.

Responding to questions from GeekWire, a Microsoft spokesperson called the new initiative “a purpose-built company with its own leadership and financial accountability” but stopped short of calling it a separate legal entity or standalone company.

Advertisement

The spokesperson said the organization “brings together more than 6,000 industry, engineering and AI professionals, drawn primarily from Microsoft’s existing engineering and forward-deployed teams,” noting that it will “grow through a combination of internal talent and external hiring across engineering, AI, and industry roles.”

Separately, some consulting roles are among those expected to be impacted by the round of layoffs anticipated next week.

Microsoft wouldn’t say whether the $2.5 billion is new spending or repurposed from existing budgets, or over what period it’s being spent. The company also hasn’t yet spelled out what the new organization means for the future of its existing consulting and services units.

Across the industry, this is happening now because the payoff from AI has proven harder to capture than many companies expected. Businesses across the economy have adopted tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Copilot, only to find that impressive demos don’t automatically translate into results. The technology is powerful, but deploying it can be difficult inside a real company, with its own data, rules and entrenched ways of working.

Advertisement

So the AI providers have started sending their own engineers to work inside those companies, figuring out where the AI can actually help, then building it into their operations.

“Having the model alone doesn’t change your workflows or how you operate,” said Marc Nachmann, Goldman Sachs’ global head of asset and wealth management, in an interview with CNBC about the Anthropic partnership. “You need people who can combine the technology with what’s actually happening in the business and implement those changes.” 

The big AI providers have multiple reasons to do this. Each of them wants to get more businesses using its AI platform at higher volumes. All of them are looking to drive long-term demand for the AI capacity they’re collectively spending hundreds of billions of dollars to build.

Another big reason: AI models are becoming commodities, getting cheaper and more similar by the month. The big money for the likes of Microsoft is in selling the services needed to make AI pay off inside a company, which is a far bigger market than just selling the models themselves.

Advertisement

Microsoft is pitching privacy and trust as a selling point. Its promise is that a customer’s data and hard-won knowledge stay the customer’s alone. Microsoft says it won’t feed them into training its AI models in ways that would hand the same advantages to the customer’s rivals. 

It’s also promising choice: customers can run whichever AI model fits the job, from OpenAI, Anthropic, Microsoft, or open-source providers, not locked into using one.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has argued that a company should be able to exchange one AI model for another without losing all the institutional knowledge it has built up. 

That’s his test, as he put it, for whether a business still controls its own future.

Advertisement

“The last thing any of us want is a world where every company across every sector is ceding value to a few models that eat everything they see,” Nadella wrote in a June 14 essay. “If all the value is accrued by only a few models, the political economy will simply not tolerate it. There is no societal permission for an AI future that hollows out entire industries.”

Whether that vision of swappable AI models becomes a reality remains to be seen. There’s actually a risk for customers that the opposite will happen in the forward deployed engineering approach. Even if they can theoretically swap in a competitor’s AI model, working with Microsoft’s engineers means their systems naturally end up running on Microsoft’s cloud platform and related technologies, making it very difficult to jump ship.

It’s also not clear how new all of this really is for the company. Microsoft already runs a large in-house delivery arm — Industry Solutions Delivery, the group that absorbed what used to be called Microsoft Consulting Services — with thousands of consultants and engineers building and deploying technology inside customer organizations. 

Microsoft also has programs like FastTrack to help customers roll out its software, and over the past year it has been rolling out “forward-deployed engineering” teams with partners, including a dedicated practice with Accenture and a $1 billion, five-year alliance with EY.

Advertisement

So ultimately the Microsoft Frontier Company is less a new company than a new push behind work the actual company was already doing, albeit bigger and better-branded than before.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Common Problems With Stihl Weed Eaters That Owners Have Experienced

Published

on





It’s no secret that Stihl makes some of the best string trimmers that money can buy, and even its less expensive models are still really good. The brand is known for its reliable yard and outdoor power tools, and its products are generally used by professionals and homeowners alike. It’s not uncommon to see Stihl products rank near the top of many tool roundups, including lists of the best chainsaws. With that said, no product is perfect, and from time to time, you may find that your Stihl string trimmer is causing you some trouble. As with most things, some problems are more common than others and are things that owners wrestle with semi-regularly. 

Problems can arise for a variety of reasons. Gas-powered string trimmers have a maintenance regimen that has to be followed, or else the trimmer may develop some problems. Stihl’s battery-powered string trimmers are also not immune to the occasional hiccup. It should also be said that sometimes issues are caused by the owner, as there are some things that people do with their string trimmers that they shouldn’t be doing. Whatever the cause, problems arise, and they can be fixed. 

Advertisement

So, if you’re having some trouble, or you’re wondering what kind of trouble you might run into with a Stihl string trimmer, below is a list of common issues based on what Stihl says on its FAQ page, along with discussions on social media and forums, as well as their most common fixes. 

Advertisement

String trimmer doesn’t run at full speed

Per Stihl, this is something that can happen often enough that the brand includes this problem toward the top of its FAQ page. The problem is described as being able to start and idle the string trimmer normally, but the trimmer never ramps up to full throttle and therefore does not cut grass or weeds effectively. Conversely, another fairly common problem is that the string trimmer will only remain on and functioning if it’s at full throttle. 

There are several potential causes for this, and they are all in the fuel system. Stihl says that the first thing you should do is check your fuel mixture. The brand says that you should never store fuel mix for longer than 60 days, so if it’s your first string trim of the year, you’ll want to drain the old fuel and replace it with fresh fuel. All of Stihl’s gas-powered equipment uses a fuel-to-oil ratio of 50:1. Improperly mixing fuel and oil can also cause this problem. 

Barring that, the common solutions for almost any problem like this are to check the spark arrester screen in the muffler to see if it’s clogged (and clean it if it is), check or replace the fuel filter, and check or replace the air filter. You’ll also want to check the spark plug and remove any excess carbon, just in case. If the problem persists, Stihl recommends sending it in for service. 

Advertisement

Bumping the trimmer doesn’t produce extra string

For the uninitiated, bumping is the act of running your string trimmer at full throttle and “bumping” the bottom of it against something hard like a brick wall or a concrete sidewalk. The centrifugal force pulls fresh string out from the head of the string trimmer, allowing you to keep cutting. This is a popular design on many big-name string trimmers. A common issue on Stihl trimmers, and to be fair, on many trimmers, is that you don’t get more string when you bump the trimmer. 

This can be caused by all sorts of potential problems, but they all revolve around the same part, the head of the string trimmer. You may be out of string, in which case you’ll need to load more into your existing head, a process that Stihl outlines here. The head may also be damaged or jammed, which would require you to take it apart to check for jams or broken pieces. This is largely the same process as replacing the string, except this time you’re looking for broken parts or a clog that you can clear. 

Advertisement

The most expensive, but easiest, way to fix basically any bumping or string trimmer head issue is to simply buy another head. Stihl sells these for nearly all of its trimmers, and they come with string pre-loaded. You should at least try to re-string your own trimmer head first, though, because it is much cheaper. 

Advertisement

The string trimmer head is locked up

It may seem like this is the same issue as the one above, but it is a different problem. In this case, people sometimes complain of a head that is locked up. That means you hit the throttle and the head doesn’t spin. This effectively stops the string trimmer from being able to cut anything since the string remains stationary. People may refer to this problem as the head seizing or locking up, which can be caused by several different potential issues. Replacing the head or replacing the string doesn’t fix this one. 

The problem tends to come from a couple of different places. First, it’s possible that you used straight gasoline instead of a gas and oil mixture (which is necessary for most two-stroke yard tools), which can cause the engine to seize due to a lack of lubrication. The solution here is to take it apart, clean it, use the proper fuel mixture, and then try again. Another common problem is a malfunction of the clutch mechanism, which may cause the head to stop spinning if the clutch can’t engage. Again, this includes disassembling the trimmer, cleaning it, repairing any damage (if you can), and then seeing if that worked. 

There are some YouTube videos that show how to do this. However, if you’re not mechanically inclined, the best option is to send it to Stihl for service. 

Advertisement

A battery-powered string trimmer won’t run

For those who go with a battery-powered Stihl string trimmer, you are not immune to having common issues of your own. A fairly common complaint is that people will insert the battery into their string trimmer, and it’ll just flat not work. You’ll hit the button to start it, and it simply won’t do anything. This can also happen to gas-powered string trimmers, but the reason is usually an incorrect fuel mixture or a flooded engine, which we’ll get to shortly. 

Battery-powered Stihl string trimmers have a few different things that can cause them not to start. The first, and most obvious, is that the battery might be dead. Take it out of the machine and put it into a charger for a bit to see if that helps. Barring that, there are two other common problems. The first is that Stihl uses a unique two-click battery system. If you don’t fully seat the battery with both clicks, it will not run, so give it another push to see if you get that second click. The other is that debris may make its way between the battery and the contacts, so clean out the battery connector area to see if that helps as well. 

Advertisement

One less common problem is debris getting inside the machine and getting jammed in a switch that connects the battery power to the rest of the machine. You can disassemble the unit and clean it out to fix that one if it’s happening to you. 

Advertisement

The string trimmer is flooded

Anything with a gas engine can flood, including cars and other heavier machines. A flooded engine occurs when there is too much fuel in the combustion chambers of the motor. This makes the fuel-air mixture too saturated with gas, preventing combustion and causing your machine to simply not start. This can happen to any engine, but it most commonly occurs in engines that have a carburetor, which gas-powered Stihl string trimmers have. It can be caused by over-priming the engine before starting it, a carburetor malfunction, or even cold weather. 

The fix generally requires you to find the cause. In my experience, most flooded engines are caused by over-priming. To fix that, you can simply wait for a little while. The excess fuel will evaporate, and then you can try again. From there, leave your Stihl string trimmer’s throttle lock on (this gives the engine more air), and try again without engaging the choke or priming the engine again. You may have to pull the cord repeatedly, but most of the time, this will fix the problem. 

If it does not fix the problem, the problem is most likely the carburetor or the motor itself. In that case, your best bet is to fix it or, if you’re not mechanically inclined, send it back to Stihl for repair.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This tiny MacBook accessory adds customizable shortcuts for meetings and productivity

Published

on

A new hardware accessory is looking to simplify one of the more frustrating aspects of using a MacBook: juggling different keyboard shortcuts across video calls, productivity apps, and development tools.

A startup Project Mirage has launched Dune, a compact USB-C accessory that adds three programmable buttons to compatible MacBooks. The device automatically changes its functions depending on the application currently in use, allowing users to perform common actions with a single press instead of memorising different keyboard shortcuts.

Dune combines context-aware controls with AI-powered customization

Unlike traditional macro keypads, Dune is designed specifically for MacBooks and is custom-built to match different laptop models, allowing it to sit flush against the side of the device. The accessory plugs directly into a USB-C port and draws power from the laptop, eliminating the need for batteries or charging.

Its three programmable buttons adapt based on the app being used. During video calls, they can be configured to mute the microphone, toggle the webcam, or bring the meeting window into focus. In spreadsheet applications, they can become copy, paste, and undo buttons, while developers can assign actions for tools such as Visual Studio Code or GitHub.

Advertisement

The device is currently compatible with MacBook Air models powered by the M2 chip or newer and MacBook Pro models featuring M1 Pro processors or later, running macOS Sequoia 15 or newer.

Project Mirage also ships Dune with a companion app that lets users create application-specific shortcuts or system-wide actions. Beyond simple keyboard commands, users can configure buttons to launch apps, open websites, or execute custom scripts.

One of the more distinctive features is its integration with Claude Desktop. Instead of manually writing automation scripts, users can describe the shortcut they want in natural language, allowing Claude to generate the required Python code and assign it to a button. According to TechCrunch, this makes creating custom workflows considerably more approachable, even for users without programming experience.

The companion app also integrates with calendars, surfacing upcoming meetings and allowing users to quickly join a call, dismiss reminders, or send a “running late” message with a single press.

Pricing and availability

Dune is currently available at an introductory price of US$119, after which it will retail for US$149.

Advertisement

As AI-assisted productivity tools continue to expand beyond software, devices like Dune suggest hardware makers are exploring new ways to make everyday computer interactions faster and more intuitive. Whether the concept catches on will likely depend on how valuable users find its growing library of customizable shortcuts and automations.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Why Mentorship Is the Most Underrated Leadership Skill

Published

on

I started my professional journey as an engineer before moving into product strategy and innovation leadership roles for several global technology organizations. Over the years, I have served as a mentor for a variety of programs including Products That Count’s strategic product management, Women in Product mentorship initiatives, and Alchemist accelerator programs.

In 2024 and 2025 I led Walmart’s Women in Product mentorship program. I was responsible for designing and implementing the programs, including managing participant registration, matching mentors with mentees, and establishing clear standards for how they would interact.

Yet for much of my own early career, I never really had a mentor.

As an individual contributor engineer, I was focused on solving problems, delivering results, and figuring things out independently. I was hesitant to ask for help for fear of being judged for what I didn’t know.

Advertisement

Part of that was also temperament. I am naturally introverted.

That mindset rewarded me well. It made me self-reliant, resilient, and deeply driven. But it also had limits. Looking back, I now realize that believing I had to navigate everything alone was not always a strength. I sometimes wonder how many opportunities I missed simply because I never asked for help.

As I moved into product management and later strategy roles, I began collaborating with larger teams, departments, and organizations. The work itself became more cross-functional and people-centered. Over time, I started recognizing the value of mentorship, sponsorship, and collaborative growth in ways I had not appreciated earlier in my career.

I received valuable advice from different people at important moments throughout my career. Some helped me navigate conflict with more clarity. Others helped me communicate my contributions more effectively. And others gave me perspective on how to approach uncertainty, deal with organizational complexity, and avoid burnout.

Advertisement

But those moments were not the same as mentorship. They were valuable but infrequent interactions, not sustained relationships. No one consistently guided me through difficult decisions, advocated for me with decision-makers and senior leadership, or actively invested in my long-term growth.

My understanding of mentorship changed not as a mentee but as a mentor.

A leadership multiplier

Mentorship is often seen as an act of goodwill: admirable but optional. In reality, effective mentorship can be a competitive advantage for everyone involved.

For mentees, it can accelerate career growth, strengthen decision-making, and create access to opportunities that hard work alone does not always unlock.

Advertisement

Mentorship strengthens an individual’s leadership skills, empathy, and the ability to develop future talent.

For organizations, mentorship builds stronger leadership pipelines, more resilient teams, and healthier cultures of growth and trust.

By getting involved, I began to understand that meaningful mentorship is not simply occasional advice or career guidance. At its best, it is an active investment in another person’s growth. It includes advocacy, sponsorship, honest feedback, visibility, and sometimes helping people access opportunities they may not have reached on their own.

That is why mentorship should not be treated as kindness or incidental support. It is one of the most practical, hands-on, and personal forms of leadership.

Advertisement

Advocacy changes careers

Advice can help someone improve, but advocacy and sponsorship can change the direction of a career.

In many organizations, career growth depends not only on talent but also on access to honest feedback, influential networks, and sponsors willing to speak about someone’s potential when opportunities are discussed. Access also includes introductions to people who can recognize the value and impact of a person’s work.

Sometimes the difference between advice and true sponsorship is illustrated more clearly through stories rather than through leadership frameworks. In The Devil Wears Prada and its sequel Nigel’s relationship with Andy evolves far beyond workplace advice. In the 2006 movie, he helps her grow professionally, pushes her to envision a more expansive future, and guides her through an unfamiliar industry.

In the sequel—set two decades later—his investment in her success continues even though their careers diverge. When Andy (played by Anne Hathaway) is laid off during a difficult job market and struggles to find meaningful opportunities, Nigel (Stanley Tucci) quietly recommends her for a role at his firm. She is arguably overqualified for the position, but Nigel recognizes that it is the right opportunity at the right time. His recommendation helps her transition from a career in the news back into working in fashion. She can regain stability and ultimately rebuild career momentum. Over time, the opportunity becomes a turning point, reshaping her professional trajectory.

Advertisement

What makes it meaningful is not just the recommendation itself. It is that Nigel continued paying attention to her career growth over the years, believed in her potential, and supported her when she needed it.

That is what meaningful mentorship and sponsorship often look like in practice: not surface-level guidance but genuine investment in someone’s long-term growth and success.

When mentors provide that kind of support intentionally, mentorship becomes more than guidance. It becomes a competitive advantage—not only for the mentee but also for the mentor and the organization.

Why inclusive mentorship matters

Mentorship matters because talent alone does not shape a career. Access is important. In many workplaces, advancement depends not only on capability but on guidance, sponsorship, visibility, and informal knowledge about upcoming job opportunities.

Advertisement

Not everyone has equal access to such advantages. Research from McKinsey and Lean In suggests that women often receive less mentorship, sponsorship, and career support than men do, even in organizations that publicly emphasize inclusion and leadership development.

When mentorship is left entirely to informal networks, opportunity often becomes uneven. And when it’s left to chance, opportunity also is uneven.

That’s why inclusive mentorship matters. It creates a more intentional way to support people who might otherwise be overlooked.

What great mentors require

“A mentor is someone who allows you to see the hope inside yourself,” Oprah Winfrey once said.

Advertisement

Great mentorship is not about having all the answers. It’s about showing up with intention. It means listening closely, being candid, and helping someone grow with more confidence and clarity.

The best mentors respect their mentees’ time. They come prepared and listen for what is needed rather than rushing to give advice. They are open about their successes and failures because honesty builds trust faster than polished stories do. Great mentors tailor their guidance to the individual and encourage growth while also creating accountability.

Above all, good mentors create a psychologically safe space. They make it easier for mentees to ask difficult questions, test or pitch ideas, and talk openly about issues without fear of being judged. Growth usually starts at that point.

Organizations have a role to play as well. If mentorship matters, the program should be visible and supported.

Advertisement

That can mean including it in stated expectations of leaders, creating ways to connect mentors and mentees, providing mentorship training, and recognizing outcomes that go beyond performance metrics.

It also can mean broadening the understanding of mentorship. Peer mentorship, cross-functional mentorship, and even cross-industry mentorship can play important roles.

The leadership gap many organizations ignore

Promoting mentorship should not involve forcing artificial relationships or turning an employee’s growth into a line on someone’s to-do list. Organizations ought to promote the idea that leaders should invest in others, helping to build stronger teams, more capable leaders, and more organizational resiliency.

At a minimum, organizations should ask mentors whether they helped their mentee grow in their career and whether the mentee became more confident, capable, or prepared as a result of the relationship. Did they help junior employees navigate the organization more effectively? What opportunities did they create or find to give the mentees more visibility? Did they help mentees develop communication, leadership, or decision-making skills?

Advertisement

Those questions might be hard to quantify, but they get close to the substance of leadership.

Legacy is built through people

People might remember the strategies a leader shaped, the products the leader created, or the financial targets that were hit. Such accomplishments matter, of course. But another part of leadership lasts longer. It lives in the coworkers whose careers were advanced because someone took the time to invest in them.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

From a Pile of Dead 3D Printers, One Maker Built a Robot That Captures Detail No Single Shot Can Reach

Published

on

Dead 3D Printer Robot Focus Stacking
Alan of the MandicReally channel needed consistent, high-resolution close-ups of 3D printer nozzles and hot ends. Every tiny surface mark and wear pattern mattered for his Mandic Labs work, yet standard microscope shots left large portions blurred. Focus stacking solves that by shooting the same subject many times at different focus depths and merging the sharp areas later. Doing the job by hand quickly becomes impractical. The microscope’s own focus ring lacks the precision and repeatability required, and even small shifts in framing or angle ruin the stack.



He overcame the challenge by creating a unique motion platform based on a secondhand desktop microscope. The machine moves the entire microscope up and down in tiny increments while the subject stays anchored to a robust platform, and for horizontal adjustment, all he has to do is touch a small knob to center any tiny bit without disturbing the microscope itself. The end result is a succession of photographs that software can combine into a single outstanding sharp snapshot, even if each individual shot would be unsteady on its own.

Sale


Bambu Lab A1 3D Printer, Support Multi-Color 3D Printing, High Speed & Precision, Full-Auto Calibration…
  • High-Speed Precision: Experience unparalleled speed and precision with the Bambu Lab A1 3D Printer. With an impressive acceleration of 10,000 mm/s…
  • Multi-Color Printing with AMS lite: Unlock your creativity with vibrant and multi-colored 3D prints. The Bambu Lab A1 3D printers make multi-color…
  • Full-Auto Calibration: Say goodbye to manual calibration hassles. The A1 3D printer takes care of all the calibration processes automatically…

The majority of the components for the robot were items he already had on hand. An outdated, discontinued Creality Ender 3 donated its main brain and screen. He got lucky and picked up a few sets of linear rails from a previous machine he’d built, allowing the contraption to move smoothly. Some stepper motors and lead screws were just taking up space in his storage bins, and he’d printed the moving parts with stiff carbon-fiber filled filament to avoid flexing and blurring the photos. The foundation is made of a leftover laser-cut acrylic sheet recovered from neighbor’s trash, and some aluminum extrusion creates a strong frame that sits on rubber feet to prevent vibrations.

Advertisement

Dead 3D Printer Robot Focus Stacking
It’s a two-axis system, with the vertical bit using a TR8x4 leadscrew and a NEMA 17 motor to lift and lower the microscope in tiny chunks, as small as 0.02mm if you can believe it. That’s ideal for the extremely small depth of field achieved at high magnification. The X axis just pushes the object sideways for a moment, allowing him to properly center it. Both axes run Marlin firmware, which he placed into the old Ender 3 brain, and there’s a vintage RepRap screen with an encoder wheel, so all he needs to do is set the total trip distance and step size, then click start.

Dead 3D Printer Robot Focus Stacking
To ensure even illumination, the lighting is coordinated utilizing a pair of white LED strips. An extra ESP32 board running WLED firmware powers several addressable RGB LEDs, which not only offer a clean visual accent to the system but also provide useful backlighting via the acrylic base. A simple 24-volt supply powers the device, which is housed in a small, neat container. Once the firmware is in order, getting the thing to work is simple. So all he has to do is set the step distance and total range on the screen, place the microscope over the subject, and push go. Each time it stops, it takes another picture, and after a while, the stacking software can combine them all into a nice photo with sharp and clear details.
[Source]

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Router Brands Could Be Misleading You With That Wi-Fi 7 Label

Published

on

Wi-Fi standards remain as confusing as ever.

If you’ve thought at all about your home internet setup lately, you’ve surely come across Wi-Fi 7 in  your research. The label is slapped on routers of all kinds, from cheap $80 options to ones that cost as much as a laptop. Brands promise faster speeds, lower latency and a network built for the future — but the reality doesn’t always match the description. Most Wi-Fi 7-branded routers are actually missing one of the key features that defines the standard, while trademark loopholes allow some brands to bypass certification requirements entirely. Plus, there’s a federal bottleneck that has prevented newer Wi-Fi 7 routers from entering the US market. To make things even more confusing, most of your devices can’t even handle Wi-Fi 7.

None of this means that a router with the Wi-Fi 7 badge is necessarily a bad product. However, it does mean that we all need to better understand exactly what we’re paying for and that things are more complicated than what product marketing pushes our way.

Advertisement

What does Wi-Fi 7 actually mean?

Wi-Fi 7 is the name the world uses for the IEEE 802.11be wireless networking standard (something most of us will never, ever, have to remember). The standard brings several upgrades over Wi-Fi 6 and Wi-Fi 6E. First of all, it introduces 320 MHz channel widths (double than the 160 MHz available in Wi-Fi 6E), something that allows it to handle multi-gigabit internet plans, deliver ultra-fast local file transfers, and prevent congestion in smart homes. Then, it introduces 4K-QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation), which encodes 12 bits of data per symbol instead of 10 to improve peak data rates. Finally, and perhaps most significantly, it adds Multi-Link Operation, or MLO as we’ll refer to it from here on out.

MLO is the thing that separates Wi-Fi 7 from all standards that came before it. There are two MLO modes. One’s STR (Simultaneous Transmit and Receive) that aggregates bandwidth across multiple bands simultaneously, and NSTR (Non-Simultaneous Transmit and receive) which alternates between bands so only one radio is active at a time. Instead of treating the 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz frequency bands as separate and mutually exclusive connections, MLO allows the router to use them all simultaneously. Therefore, traffic is distributed based on load, available spectrum, interference, and so on. That should translate into significantly lower latency for gaming, for instance. MLO is a requirement for brands to get the “Wi-Fi Certified 7” stamp from the Wi-Fi Alliance, even if it’s only the NSTR mode.

Advertisement

The WiFi 7 hyphen loophole and how that affects you

Keep your eyes peeled when shopping for routers, though: the difference between “Wi-Fi 7” and “WiFi 7” isn’t just a stylistic choice. The Wi-Fi Alliance owns the trademark for “Wi-Fi” with a hyphen. When a manufacturer drops that hyphen and labels a product “WiFi 7,” it’s technically not using the trademarked term and no longer bound by the certification requirements. Without naming names, there are plenty of products out there with the “WiFi 7” label that omit MLO entirely.

Therefore, a router marked as such can be sold without one of Wi-Fi 7’s most crucial features. And that’s how shoppers pay a premium for devices that aren’t really upgrades.

Does the Wi-Fi Certified 7 label guarantee MLO performance?

As per the Wi-Fi Alliance, MLO “allows devices to transmit and receive data simultaneously over multiple links for increased throughput, reduced latency, and improved reliability.” The catch, however, is that true simultaneous MLO isn’t really available in most routers, as RTINGS found after testing 25 of them in February 2026. True simultaneous MLO requires multiple physically independent radios syncing perfectly and transmitting and receiving on separate bands at the same time. What most of these routers do is alternate the bands they use, which can lead to fluctuating internet speeds. Their conclusion is that Wi-Fi 7 routers aren’t worth the price difference over older generation routers. At least not right now, when manufacturers make bold claims about what the products are capable of without actually delivering on them properly.

Does this all matter? In principle, of course it does. A Wi-Fi 7 router is an investment, not just from a financial standpoint. Ideally, you’ll get something that you can use for many years to come.

Advertisement

You do have to remember, however, that Wi-Fi 7 is a hardware standard, not a software configuration. To benefit from all those fancy specs like 320 MHz channels, 4K-QAM, or any form of MLO, you need more than the router. Your home internet plan plays an important role here. Wi-Fi 7 is capable of delivering local speeds between 2 Gbps and 3.5 Gbps. If you pay your ISP for a standard 500 Mbps internet plan, your Wi-Fi 7 router will not magically deliver internet faster than that. Another thing you have to consider at this time is that not a lot of hardware comes with a Wi-Fi 7 chip. Only the newest generation of smartphones, tablets, and laptops comes with such capabilities, and the pace of adoption has been rather slow. For example, Apple’s first Wi-Fi 7 laptops arrived earlier this year with the new M5 chip. The previous M4 MacBook Pro and MacBook Air (released in 2024 and 2025) shipped with Wi-Fi 6E chips.

How the FCC disrupted the Wi-Fi 7 market

On March 23, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) blocked the certification of new wireless hardware built, designed, or assembled outside the United States. That basically blocked pretty much all new routers from being sold within the US. Slowly, the FCC started adding exemptions for router brands like Netgear and Eero that promised to onshore their manufacturing to the US. Other router brands, such as TP-Link, ASUS, and Linksys, are stuck in limbo, as they’re only legally allowed to sell whatever Wi-Fi 7 models were certified before the ban.

The timing isn’t ideal for the Wi-Fi 7 category, as new generations of routers with more capable designs are being released but aren’t widely available in the US. For consumers, the consequence is a frozen landscape where hardware improvements that could finally address some of the current Wi-Fi shortcomings are blocked.

Advertisement

What to actually care about when getting a new router

When buying a new router, you have to take into account multiple factors. One of those is your internet plan, another is the devices in your household. There are quite a few generations of routers you can grab right now. Wi-Fi 5 remains functional for basic browsing and streaming, but it’s not very efficient if you have gigabit internet and use more than a handful of devices. Wi-Fi 6 is a good pick for anyone on sub-gigabit internet, and it does a better job at handling multiple simultaneous connections.

Wi-Fi 6E adds the 6 GHz band which gives you an express lane that completely bypasses 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands that often get jammed up. Wi-Fi 6E routers provide great performance and are available for lower prices than Wi-Fi 7 models, while providing the performance most households need.

Wi-Fi 7 routers become worth the investment if you have multi-gigabit fiber plans, multiple Wi-Fi 7 devices, and actually require heavy local network transfers.

Advertisement

Currently, the Wi-Fi 7 router market faces multiple problems. There’s a certification standard that permits the cheapest possible MLO implementation to satisfy its requirements, a trademark structure that is fully exploited by some brands to bypass even that baseline, and a federal supply chain restriction that has blocked router brands from closing the gap between marketing claims and actual performance.

At the end of the day, if your speed test matches your internet plan, your router is doing its job. You shouldn’t pay a premium price for a dream that your devices don’t support, the certification process doesn’t enforce, and the FCC ban has stalled. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Hobbit-like Humans May Have Scavenged Komodo Dragons’ Leftovers to Survive

Published

on

CNN reports:


Prehistoric human relatives, nicknamed “hobbits” due to their short stature, may have been scavengers, rather than skilled hunters capable of taking down big game or building cooking fires, according to new research. The study adds to growing evidence that Homo floresiensis, which had a brain only slightly bigger than that of a chimpanzee, wasn’t as advanced as scientists previously believed….

The researchers believe that much like how Komodo dragons hunt water buffaloes today, they were using their venomous bite to take down Stegodons — and after the scene was clear, Homo floresiensis swept in to cleave meat from what remained… The new study reinforces a long-held suspicion that Homo floresiensis is not a dwarfed form of Homo erectus but a descendant of a more primitive Homo habilis-like or Australopithecus-like form that arrived on the island more than1 million years ago, said Dr. Chris Stringer, a research leader specializing in human origins and paleoanthropology at London’s Natural History Museum.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025