Connect with us

Entertainment

Denise Richards Opens Up About Alledged Abuse From EX

Published

on

Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers at 'The ToyBox' Premiere

Former “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” star Denise Richards accused her estranged husband, Aaron Phypers, of domestic abuse in July 2025, following his filing for divorce on the 7th of that month. Now, more than a year later, the mom of two is opening up to Bunnie XO about the abuse she allegedly faced in the marriage, including that it caused her to feel sympathy for him.

Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers at 'The ToyBox' Premiere
Majil / AFF-USA.com / MEGA

Richards appeared on the August 3 episode of Bunnie XO’s “Dumb Blonde Podcast.” While on the show, the actress opened up about her marriage to Phypers, stating that it did not “start out that way” regarding the alleged physical attacks. However, over time, she began to experience abuse that she considered to be “emotional,” “physical,” and “financial.”

She went on to state that Phypers became a “different person than the person I married.” Richards also claimed to feel that the medical professional had “conned” her. From there, Richards reflected on the situation, saying, “That’s the hardest part of it. We were together over eight years, married a little over six, and I never thought I would’ve been in this situation ever. And now I get it.”

Regarding the common perception about victims and survivors of abuse, the “RHOBH” alum said, “It’s easy to say, ‘Why wouldn’t someone leave,’ or ‘You should’ve known, you should’ve seen these things.’ A lot of people asked me that. I didn’t. I wouldn’t have married the person.”

The ‘RHOBH’ Alum Says She ‘Felt Bad’ For Aaron

Denise Richards at The Bold And The Beautiful'' BBTV Launch Event
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

Later in the interview, Richards responded to some of the claims Phypers made about her. First, she denied that she ever abused him. Additionally, the “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” alum refuted his accusation that she had been unfaithful to him. However, she did admit to inappropriate texting with another man.

After that, she discussed the timeline of abuse, claiming that his first act of violence came shortly after their marriage. In recalling her reaction, she said, “I was so shocked. I was like, ‘Oh, f-ck. There’s no going back from this.’ My dad always taught my sister and I; he said, ‘If a man hits you once, he’ll hit you again.’ And I told him, I said, ‘I don’t know what to do.’”

Advertisement

She continued, saying that Phypers was “remorseful” after striking her for the first time. Because of this, she says she “felt bad for him.” As a result of the sympathy, she “played down” the alleged attack.

Richards continued reflecting, saying, “It was stuff that I could hide, on my arms or something. And then he gave me a black eye. And that was when I was like, ‘Oh, f-ck. What am I gonna do now? How am I gonna tell people?’ It was awful.”

Denise Says Aaron Gave Her A Black Eye After The Police Were Called

Denise Richards at GMA
MEGA

Richards then shed more light on the abuse she claims led her to sustain a black eye. Specifically, she stated that it happened after the police had been called due to an altercation at the residence. According to her, after the officers left, he called her a “f-cking b-tch” and then hit her.

She recalled wondering if her husband was “okay” following the attack. Richards then said, “I was so scared… And then it was just all the time, doing stuff. But [people] ask me, ‘How come you never called the police?’ I’m like, ‘I didn’t call the police, and they showed up, and that’s what happened to me.”

The former “RHOBH” personality went on to state that she was afraid to attempt leaving Phypers. She also said she became “so beaten down” that she “didn’t know how to leave.” The “Wild Things” star added, “It’s survival. He’s such a big guy. I’ve never laid a hand on him. Oh my God, I would not be here right now if I did.”

Advertisement

She Was Granted Permanent Restraining Order Against Aaron

Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers at 'The ToyBox' Premiere
Majil / AFF-USA.com / MEGA

Richards filed for a temporary restraining order from Phypers on July 16, 2025, after accusing him of physical and emotional abuse. According to Us Weekly, several months later in November, she was granted a permanent restraining order.

Under the order, Phypers must maintain a 100-yard distance from the actress until November 7, 2030. He’s also not allowed to contact her. Phypers is also prohibited from owning firearms following the restraining order.

Denise Richards Keeps An Active Profile In Hollywood

Denise Richards is seen smiling while inside the Today Show this morning in New York City
Eric Kowalsky / MEGA

Amid her ongoing divorce from Phypers, Denise is extending her legendary acting career, including returning to “The Bold and the Beautiful” in May 2026. Additionally, she had a film, “Dirty Hands,” released on digital/video-on-demand platforms in April 2026.

According to IMDb, she has multiple projects in post-production.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

‘Twin Peaks’ Officially Returns With Its Original Cast in a Big Way

Published

on

Gordon Cole sitting in a chair with a pensive expression in Twin Peaks: The Return.

For most television shows, the end is easy to define. The finale airs, the cast moves on, and years later, fans gather for the occasional reunion panel to reminisce about what once was. Twin Peaks has never worked like that. More than three decades after David Lynch and Mark Frost first introduced audiences to the town of Twin Peaks, the series is still creating entirely new experiences for the people who love it. That’s what makes the newly announced David Lynch birthday celebration in Los Angeles so remarkable. On the surface, it’s a reunion featuring many of the show’s original stars. In reality, it’s proof that Twin Peaks has evolved beyond a television series into something much harder to define: a living community sustained by the people who made it, the fans who continue embracing it, and the creative legacy Lynch left behind.

The David Lynch Birthday Celebration Is More Than a Cast Reunion

Gordon Cole sitting in a chair with a pensive expression in Twin Peaks: The Return.
Gordon Cole sitting in a chair with a pensive expression in Twin Peaks: The Return.
Image via Showtime
Advertisement

Taking place on January 20, 2027, at the United Theater on Broadway in Los Angeles, the celebration reunites Sheryl Lee (Laura Palmer), Ray Wise (Leland Palmer), Michael Horse (Deputy Hawk), Dana Ashbrook (Bobby Briggs), Kimmy Robertson (Lucy Moran), Harry Goaz (Andy Brennan), and Twin Peaks: The Return executive producer Sabrina S. Sutherland for an evening dedicated to both the series and the filmmaker who made it possible. Fans can expect cast conversations, behind-the-scenes stories, live musical performances, autograph sessions, VIP photo opportunities, and an after-show gathering with the guests. The evening will also feature a tribute celebrating Lynch’s life and work.

Individually, none of those activities are especially unusual. Television reunions happen all the time, but it’s the combination that makes this event different. This isn’t an evening built around replaying favorite scenes or celebrating a milestone anniversary. Instead, it recreates the experience that has kept Twin Peaks alive for decades. Fans will be talking with the people who made the show they love rather than just rewatching it, listening to the music that defined it, sharing the experience with hundreds of other fans, and collectively celebrating the artist whose imagination made all of it possible.

‘Twin Peaks’ Doesn’t Survive Because People Rewatch It

main-photo-2023-11-01t194412-227.jpg
Twin Peaks The Return
Advertisement

Plenty of classic television series remain popular because people continue streaming them, while Twin Peaks has endured because people have continued building a culture around it. No matter how many years pass, Twin Peaks fans continue to introduce the series to new viewers, creating new debates about the symbolism that they continue to take part in as they revisit the series. They travel to attend conventions and retrospective screenings or to visit filming locations, where they then spend hours discussing scenes that still refuse to offer definitive answers. The cast has become part of that culture, too. Instead of distancing themselves from a project they completed decades ago, many of the performers have continued showing up for fans through conventions, interviews, festivals, and special events. Their relationship with Twin Peaks didn’t end when production wrapped and, in many ways, it evolved alongside the audience’s own relationship with the series.

That ongoing connection is what separates Twin Peaks from so many other influential shows. The series no longer exists only as the episodes Lynch and Frost created. It also exists in the conversations that continue to be sparked, in the friendships built through a shared love of the show, and in events like this one that give fans another opportunity to celebrate something that holds such a special place in media history for so many people.

Lynch’s death last year understandably changed the way fans think about the future of Twin Peaks. Whatever stories remained untold now seem destined to stay that way. Yet this celebration makes something equally important clear: Lynch’s greatest creation never depended solely on new episodes to continue to live on. One of the evening’s defining moments will undoubtedly be its tribute to Lynch, but placing that tribute alongside conversations with the cast, live music, and direct fan interaction says something powerful about the legacy he leaves behind. His work is doing more than being memorialized in a museum or reflected upon in a retrospective, because it’s still bringing people together. That may be the most remarkable thing Twin Peaks has accomplished.

Advertisement

More than three decades after it premiered, the series continues creating new memories instead of simply asking audiences to relive old ones. Fans who attend this celebration will leave with entirely new stories connected to the series, whether that’s hearing Wise recall an unforgettable day on set, listening to the music performed live, meeting Lee for the first time, or simply spending an evening surrounded by hundreds of people who understand why this strange little town has never been easy to leave, and that’s how communities survive. Television shows eventually become history, but communities continue growing. The upcoming David Lynch birthday celebration is proof that Twin Peaks has become the latter.


la9cnsdo50iqpz8a2fyvpmvjzaf.jpg
Advertisement


Release Date
Advertisement

1990 – 1991-00-00

Directors

Lesli Linka Glatter, Caleb Deschanel, Duwayne Dunham, Tim Hunter, Todd Holland, Tina Rathborne, Diane Keaton, Graeme Clifford, James Foley, Jonathan Sanger, Mark Frost, Stephen Gyllenhaal

Advertisement

Writers

Mark Frost, David Lynch, Harley Peyton, Robert Engels, Barry Pullman, Scott Frost, Tricia Brock

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

7 Modern Detective Books That Are Perfect From the First Page to the Last

Published

on

Book cover for 'Watching You' by Arne Dahl

One of the greatest genres is the detective novel. People continue to read them and get into a new detective story, despite many critics and audiences declaring them exhausted once every few years. Every time we think we’ve read it all, the detective novel returns in a new coat, whether in the Nordic noir crime thriller format, an Agatha Christie homage format, or a procedural format that begins as a courtroom drama and ends up being a supernatural thriller.

The modern detective novels on our list span decades and continents, and they all present a case that is compelling on its own but is ultimately wrapped around detectives who will entice readers to follow them into any kind of mess they end up in. With these compelling detectives and their creators, you never know what they’re going to do next—or you’ve read enough about them to feel like you’ve known them forever. Here are modern detective books that are perfect from the first page to the last.

Advertisement

‘Watching You’ (2016)

Book cover for 'Watching You' by Arne Dahl
Book cover for ‘Watching You’ by Arne Dahl
Image via Vintage

Every now and then, a crime writer decides that the ongoing series they’ve been gracing our eyes with is no longer what they want to write about—and opens the Word doc to write a brand-new series of even better works. That’s essentially what Jan Arnald, aka Arne Dahl, did with Watching You, the book that launched his Sam Berger series after years of directing the ensemble-driven Intercrime novels. In the first installment, Berger begins to receive messages that appear to be aimed solely at him, tiny metal cogs left at crime scenes linked to missing teenage girls. As more girls go missing, Berger must persuade his own department not to dismiss the cases as unrelated, all while an old wound from his early days on the force resurfaces at the worst possible time.

What makes Watching You so enjoyable is its lean, mean, and more akin to hard-boiled American noir style than the procedural sprawl of his previous work, and it seems as if it knows exactly what kind of tension it’s creating. This is an introduction to Berger and his eventual partner, Molly Blom, one of Nordic noir’s most quietly compelling duos, and the kind of first chapter that makes you eager for the sequel. Dahl writes the Berger & Blom novels in the style of a movie, with close-up shots, tense storytelling that feels like he’s editing a film on the fly, and just enough introspection to make readers feel like they’re right there with Sam Berger and Molly Blom.

Advertisement

‘The Snowman’ (2007)

The-Snowman-2007-cover
The-Snowman-2007-cover
Image via Knopf Publishing Group

Jo Nesbø‘s seventh Harry Hole novel, The Snowman, features a brilliant, alcoholic character—Harry Hole—who is allergic to authority and happiness, making him one of crime fiction’s greatest walking disasters. The Snowman may be known to wider audiences because of its (disastrous) adaptation into a film starring Michael Fassbender; the novel deserved more, because it’s genuinely a great detective book. In The Snowman, Harry Hole connects the disappearance of a woman to a taunting letter addressed to him personally and then to a decade-long pattern of women disappearing on the first snowfall of the season.

The book’s genius is more than just the atmosphere, which does a lot of heavy lifting, with all the Norwegian winter darkness pressing in around every scene. It’s also that the killer views the entire situation as a private game with Harry, breaking his own carefully constructed pattern solely to keep his opponent off guard. Nesbø has openly credited Michael Connelly‘s Harry Bosch as a formative influence on Hole, and The Snowman is the book where that lineage pays off hardest, pairing genuinely upsetting set pieces with a detective whose slow-motion collapse feels just as urgent as the murders he’s pursuing.

Advertisement

‘In the Woods’ (2007)

Four images of tree branches rotated into a mismatched collage on the book cover of In the Woods by Tana French.
Four images of tree branches rotated into a mismatched collage on the book cover of In the Woods by Tana French.
Image via Penguin Books

Few book openings in the genre are as unsettling as this one: in 1984, three children go into the woods outside a Dublin suburb, and only one returns, clutching a tree trunk, blood-soaked, and unable to recall a single second of what happened. Twenty years later, that survivor, Rob Ryan, works as a detective in the Dublin Murder Squad and has never revealed his true identity to anyone. When a twelve-year-old girl is found murdered in the same woods, Ryan and his partner, Cassie Maddox, are called in, and Ryan is forced to work a crime scene that is also, quietly, the site of his own unresolved trauma.

Tana French isn’t interested in providing a tidy solution to the childhood disappearance that opens In the Woods, and she never does. For nearly two decades, readers have been divided on this choice, with some seeing it as a genuinely brave statement about the unreliability of memory and others feeling as if the rug was pulled out from under them. In the Woods is the first novel in the Dublin Murder Squad series, but it’s this first novel that emphasizes Ryan and Maddox’s partnership, making it one of the most emotional and pulling-in in the genre. If you’re a fan of unreliable narrators and procedural novels, this one’s a (hidden) treasure.

Advertisement

‘Bluebird, Bluebird’ (2017)

Book cover of 'Bluebird, Bluebird' by Attica Locke
Book cover of ‘Bluebird, Bluebird’ by Attica Locke
Image via Mulholland Books

Bluebird, Bluebird, by Attica Locke, begins with a man, Darren Mathews, arriving in the small town of Lark, Texas, in truly bad shape. He’s been suspended from the Texas Rangers and estranged from his wife, and his drinking habits are worsening with each sip. After a Black lawyer from Chicago and a local white woman are discovered dead within days of each other, Mathews, despite the fact that he is not supposed to be on the case, is unable to walk away from this murder; it’s the kind of case that comes with the specific racial history of the place he grew up trying to escape.

Locke is a Texas native and a writer on When They See Us and Little Fires Everywhere, and she built this novel around Highway 59, a road her own family actually traveled, winning both the Edgar Award and the Anthony Award. And for good reason: Bluebird, Bluebird never views its whodunit plot and social conscience as competing interests. The mystery is solved with great satisfaction, but what remains is Mathews himself, a Black lawman working within a system that was never designed with him in mind, who continues to do the job regardless. This detective novel comes with layers of race, discrimination, and self-discovery, and Mathews could be a brilliant protagonist in a well-made detective film, soaked in the Texas sun and full of clever dialogue.











Advertisement









Collider Exclusive · Horror Survival Quiz
Which Horror Villain Do You Have the Best Chance of Surviving?
Jason Voorhees · Michael Myers · Freddy Krueger · Pennywise · Chucky
Advertisement

Five killers. Five completely different ways to die — if you’re not smart enough, fast enough, or self-aware enough to avoid it. Only one of them is the villain your particular set of instincts gives you a fighting chance against. Eight questions will figure out which one.

🏕️Jason

🔪Michael

💤Freddy

🎈Pennywise

Advertisement

🪆Chucky

Advertisement

01

Something feels wrong. You can’t explain it — you just know. What do you do?
First instincts are the difference between the survivor and the first act casualty.





Advertisement

02

Where are you most likely to find yourself when things go wrong?
Setting is everything in horror. Where you are determines which rules apply.





Advertisement

03

What is your most reliable survival asset?
Every survivor has a quality the villain didn’t account for. What’s yours?





Advertisement

04

What kind of fear is hardest for you to fight through?
Knowing your weakness is the first step to not dying because of it.





Advertisement

05

You’re with a group when things start going wrong. What’s your role?
Horror movies are brutally clear about who survives group situations and who doesn’t.





Advertisement

06

What’s the horror movie mistake you’re most likely to make?
Honest self-assessment is a survival skill. Denial is not.





Advertisement

07

What’s your best weapon against something that can’t be stopped by conventional means?
Every horror villain has a weakness. The survivors are always the ones who find it.





Advertisement

08

It’s the final scene. You’re the last one standing. How did you make it?
The final survivor always has a reason. What’s yours?





Advertisement
Your Survival Odds Have Been Calculated
Your Best Chance Is Against…

Your instincts, your strengths, and your particular way of thinking under pressure point to one villain you actually have a fighting chance against. Everyone else — good luck.

Advertisement


Camp Crystal Lake · Friday the 13th

Jason Voorhees

Jason is relentless, but he is also predictable — and that is the gap you would exploit.

  • He moves in straight lines toward his target. He doesn’t strategise, doesn’t adapt, doesn’t outsmart. He simply pursues.
  • Your ability to keep moving, use the environment, and resist the panic that freezes most victims gives you a genuine edge.
  • The Crystal Lake survivors were always the ones who stopped running in circles and started thinking about terrain, water, and distance.
  • You think like that. Which means Jason, for all his indestructibility, would face someone who simply refused to be where he expected.

Advertisement


Haddonfield, Illinois · Halloween

Michael Myers

Michael watches before he moves. He is patient, methodical, and almost impossible to detect — until it’s too late for anyone who isn’t paying close enough attention.

  • But you are paying attention. You notice the shape in the window, the car parked slightly wrong, the silence where there should be sound.
  • Michael’s power lies in the invisibility of ordinary suburbia — the fact that nothing ever looks wrong until it already is.
  • Your spatial awareness and instinct to map every room, every exit, and every shadow before you need them is precisely the quality Laurie Strode had.
  • You are not a victim waiting to happen. You are someone who already suspects something is wrong — and acts on it.

Advertisement


Elm Street · A Nightmare on Elm Street

Freddy Krueger

Freddy wins by getting inside your head — using your own fears, your own memories, your own subconscious as weapons against you. That strategy requires a target who can be destabilised.

  • You are harder to destabilise than most. You’ve faced uncomfortable truths about yourself and you haven’t looked away.
  • The survivors on Elm Street were always the ones who understood what was happening and chose to face it rather than flee from it.
  • Freddy’s greatest weakness is that his power evaporates in the presence of someone who refuses to give him the fear he feeds on.
  • Your psychological resilience — the ability to stay grounded when reality itself becomes unreliable — is exactly the quality that keeps you alive here.

Advertisement


Derry, Maine · It

Pennywise

Pennywise is ancient, shapeshifting, and feeds on terror — but it has one critical vulnerability: it cannot function against someone who genuinely stops being afraid of it.

  • The Losers Club didn’t survive because they were braver than everyone else. They survived because they faced their fears together, and faced them honestly.
  • You ask the questions others avoid. You look directly at what frightens you rather than turning away.
  • That directness — the refusal to let fear fester in the dark — is Pennywise’s worst nightmare.
  • It chose the wrong target when it chose you. You are exactly the kind of person whose fear tastes like nothing at all.

Advertisement


Chicago · Child’s Play

Chucky

Chucky’s greatest advantage is that nobody takes him seriously until it’s already too late. He exploits the gap between how something looks and what it actually is.

  • You don’t have that gap. You take threats seriously regardless of how they present — and you never make the mistake of underestimating something because of its size or appearance.
  • Chucky relies on surprise, on the delay between recognition and response. You close that delay faster than almost anyone.
  • Your instinct to treat every unfamiliar thing with appropriate scepticism — rather than dismissing it because it seems absurd — is the exact quality that keeps you breathing.
  • Against Chucky, not laughing is already winning. You are very good at not laughing.
Advertisement

‘The Outsider’ (2018)

Book cover for 'The Outsider' by Stephen King
Book cover for ‘The Outsider’ by Stephen King
Image via Scribner
Advertisement

Stephen King‘s The Outsider appears to be a tight procedural at first, but it gradually reveals that it’s actually something a lot more sinister and even out of this world. Terry Maitland, a well-liked Little League coach, is publicly arrested by Detective Ralph Anderson for the brutal murder of an eleven-year-old boy. The arrest is supported by DNA, fingerprints, and eyewitness accounts that all point to Maitland’s presence at the scene. But an issue arises when it’s revealed that Maitland has a solid alibi, as multiple witnesses and video footage place him in a completely different city at the very moment of the crime. Reluctantly, Anderson brings in Holly Gibney, who was previously a supporting character in King’s Bill Hodges trilogy and is now finally getting her own moment in the spotlight as a private investigator.

King constructs the emotional core of the book around Anderson’s professional faith in hard evidence, watching a lifelong empiricist be dragged, kicking and doubting, toward a truth that defies every rule he’s built his career on. What begins as a rigorous “impossible alibi” mystery gradually reveals an entity feeding on life around it. It is both horror and detective fiction at the same time, and King does a remarkable job of balancing the two genres. If you had any doubts about King’s ability to write gripping detective fiction, The Outsider is proof—the HBO adaptation is every bit as good as the book, and Holly Gibney subtly establishes herself as a detective fiction mainstay.

‘Dead Lions’ (2013)

Dead-Lions-2013-cover
Dead-Lions-2013-cover
Image via Baskerville
Advertisement

Dead Lions is Mick Herron‘s second Slough House novel, and it demonstrates that he isn’t writing a series as much as he is creating a world, specifically the bleakest corner of British intelligence anyone has thought to depict on the page—Slough House. It is where MI5 sends its failures: agents who have burned sources, had affairs with the wrong people, or simply become old and inconvenient. They’re called “slow horses,” and their primary function is to generate paperwork until they quit. Jackson Lamb, their leader, is a breathtakingly rude former field agent who may or may not be very dangerous and is the most compelling character in modern spy fiction.

Dead Lions revolves around an old Cold War ghost named Dickie Bow, who is discovered dead on a bus to Oxford in circumstances that appear to be a heart attack but, to Lamb, are something else entirely. Meanwhile, two Slough House agents are assigned to babysit a visiting Russian oligarch, a job that proves to be far less boring than expected. Herron writes with the passion of someone who has deeply internalized John le Carré, but Dead Lions hides something unique—a darkly comical heart that will make you laugh out loud and fall in love with the slow horses.

‘Magpie Murders’ (2016)

Magpie-Murders-book-cover
Magpie-Murders-book-cover
Image via Harper
Advertisement

Magpie Murders is a small miracle in terms of structure: it features two complete mysteries being woven into one book, and both of them work perfectly. The first is a Golden Age-style whodunit, reportedly written by bestselling crime novelist Alan Conway, in which detective Atticus Pünd, a Holocaust survivor turned celebrated sleuth, solves two murders in the sleepy English village of Saxby-on-Avon. The second story follows Susan Ryeland, Conway’s real-life editor, who discovers that the manuscript’s final chapters, which reveal the killer, have gone missing, just as Conway himself is found dead in what appears to be a suicide.

Horowitz is a veteran mystery screenwriter, and he’s best known for Foyle’s War and Midsomer Murders, two of the most compelling mystery series on British television. Horowitz arranges his clues so that the two mysteries complement each other, implying that solving Conway’s death and Pünd’s fictional case are, cleverly, the same act that warrants paying attention. Magpie Murders feels like a heartfelt tribute to Agatha Christie that also successfully manages to be totally unique, showing that even the most worn-out area of the genre still has space for a truly brilliant trick.


Magpie Murders TV Poster
Advertisement


Magpie Murders

Advertisement


Release Date

2022 – 2022-00-00

Advertisement

Network

PBS

Directors
Advertisement

Peter Cattaneo

Writers

Anthony Horowitz, Tim Morris

Advertisement


Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Emily Ratajkowski Strips Down and Goes Skinny Dipping

Published

on

Emily Ratajkowski Strips Down and Goes Skinny Dipping on Vacation

Emily Ratajkowski is all about a nude moment.

Ratajkowski, 29, showed off her curves while taking a nighttime dip via Instagram on Sunday, August 2. In the pic, the model stripped down to her birthday suit while posing on a rock in front of a body of water. She gave the camera a pout as she held a wine glass in front of her chest.

The Gone Girl actress went makeup-free in the pic and wore her brown hair, which was still wet from swimming, in an updo with strands poking out.

Elsewhere in her photo dump, Ratajkowski flaunted her bikini body in an orange suit featuring a white-and-black pattern. Her set featured triangle cups, which she tied tight enough to expose her underboob, and long straps that crisscrossed over her abs. Ratajkowski completed her look with string bottoms.

Advertisement
Emily Ratajkowski Strips Down and Goes Skinny Dipping on Vacation
Courtesy of Emily Ratajkowski/Instagram

The Victoria’s Secret angel made her look even hotter with gold cuff bracelets and a coin necklace. For glam, she donned blush on the tip of her nose, black eyeliner, long lashes and lined lips. She parted her hair down the center and wore her mane down.

“julio/Ιούλιος/july,” she captioned the post. Her friends and fans went wild over her thirst trap in the comments section.

Advertisement
Emily Ratajkowski's Bikini Body and Washboard Abs Steal the Spotlight as She Wraps Up Her Vacation


Related: Emily Ratajkowski’s Bikini Body and Abs Steal the Vacation Spotlight

​​Emily Ratajkowski is ringing in the end of August with her best swimwear yet. The model, 34, proved to have no shortage of sexy looks while soaking up the sun on Monday, September 1. In a carousel of photos she shared via Instagram, Ratajkowski flaunted her bikini body and washboard abs, first posing in a […]

“🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥,” Irina Shayk wrote, while Wildflower Cases cofounder Sydney Lynn Carlson added, “Mammaasaaacita.” One of her fans praised, “I loveeeeee vacation Emily.” Another gushed, “There is no summer without your summer posts ♥️♥️♥️.”

This isn’t the first time Ratajkowski has shown off her toned figure. In June, she went topless underneath a red crochet dress featuring long sleeves and a flowy skirt. She styled the piece with high-cut bikini bottoms.

Advertisement

While posing in the number, Ratajkowski shared a hilarious reel of herself tripping and falling off a stone wall. “Back on my favorite island (Mallorca!) and trying out some new ones too (🇬🇷)!” she captioned the post.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

8 R-Rated War Movies That Can Be Called Masterpieces

Published

on

Josh Hartnett as Eversmann hiding and looking to the distance in Black Hawk Down (2001).

War cinema can lose its nerve in two opposite directions. Some films turn combat into clean hero worship. Others pile on misery until soldiers become symbols instead of people. The masterpieces stay close to the confusion. Orders clash with instinct, courage sits beside terror, and survival often depends on choices nobody should have to make.

These eight films understand that war changes shape depending on where a person stands. It can be a street full of gunfire, a muddy trench, or a bomb hidden under rubbish. None of them let the audience leave with an easy answer. Let’s figure why they’re widely regarded as masterpieces, and how we’ve chosen to rank them. Scroll down slowly.

Advertisement

8

‘Black Hawk Down’ (2001)

Josh Hartnett as Eversmann hiding and looking to the distance in Black Hawk Down (2001).
Josh Hartnett as Eversmann hiding and looking to the distance in Black Hawk Down (2001).
Image via Sony Pictures Releasing

A United States military operation in Mogadishu is supposed to capture senior figures connected to warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid and end quickly. But that doesn’t happen in Black Hawk Down. Two Black Hawk helicopters are shot down, trapping American soldiers across a hostile city while rescue teams struggle through blocked streets and relentless fire. The film is adapted from Mark Bowden’s nonfiction book and is helmed by Ridley Scott.

It follows the 1993 Battle of Mogadishu through overlapping squads rather than one traditional hero. That choice turns the mission into a constantly shifting map of injuries, wrong turns, radio calls, and men trying to reach one another before ammunition runs out. The sound is overwhelming. The geography remains clear enough to understand how one failed movement creates another crisis. Eversmann (Josh Hartnett) begins with confidence and ends the night carrying the weight of people he could not save. Hoot (Eric Bana) treats danger with professional calm, though his closing thoughts strip away any illusion that soldiers fight for speeches delivered far from the street. They keep moving for the person beside them. The film has been criticised for narrowing the Somali perspective, and that limitation deserves attention. But overall, it’s brilliant.

Advertisement

7

‘1917’ (2019)

Lance Corporal William "Will" Schofield, looking stunned and being held back by other soldiers in a trench in 1917
George MacKay as Lance Corporal William “Will” Schofield, looking stunned and being held back by other soldiers in a trench in 1917
Image via Universal Pictures

In 1917, two young British soldiers receive an order that sounds impossible even before they leave the trench. Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) and Schofield (George MacKay) must cross abandoned enemy territory and reach another battalion before dawn, warning them that a planned attack is a German trap. Blake’s brother is among the men preparing to advance, so the mission is urgent long before the first bullet appears. It’s said that Sam Mendes drew partly from stories told by his grandfather, Alfred Mendes, and built the film around the feeling of a journey unfolding almost without interruption.

That visual approach could have become a technical showpiece with little underneath it. Instead, the camera keeps forcing the audience to experience distance the way Schofield does. Mud slows him down. A collapsed tunnel steals time. A burning town destroys every clear route. Blake’s death arrives with shocking speed, leaving Schofield to finish a mission that began as someone else’s family emergency. His run across the battlefield is unforgettable partly due to the accidents left in the take, including soldiers colliding with him as explosions continue. He reaches Colonel Mackenzie (Benedict Cumberbatch), delivers the warning, then finds Blake’s brother. The victory is real, painfully small, and surrounded by thousands of lives that could still disappear the next day. 1917 is undoubtedly a masterpiece.

Advertisement

6

‘The Hurt Locker’ (2008)

Jeremy Renner as William squints among other soldiers in The Hurt Locker
Jeremy Renner as William in The Hurt Locker
Image via Summit Entertainment 

The Hurt Locker’s premise follows an Army bomb disposal team serving in Baghdad during the Iraq War, where every pile of rubbish, parked vehicle, and watching civilian could conceal a device. Staff Sergeant William James (Jeremy Renner) takes command after the death of the previous team leader and quickly unsettles Sanborn (Anthony Mackie) and Eldridge (Brian Geraghty) with his appetite for risk. He removes protective gear, ignores protocol, and approaches bombs with an intimacy that looks close to addiction. And the film comes from Kathryn Bigelow (Vikings).

The Hurt Locker avoids turning James’ recklessness into uncomplicated bravery. James is exceptional at the job, and the job has damaged his ability to exist anywhere else. The tension, instead, comes from waiting beside the team while ordinary surroundings become impossible to trust. A man holding a phone may be frightened, curious, or preparing to detonate a bomb. A dead child may have been turned into a weapon. A deserted street can contain dozens of eyes and no reliable information. Beautiful hooks all the way till the end.

Advertisement

5

‘The Thin Red Line’ (1998)

Jim Caviezel looking ahead with teary eyes in The Thin Red Line - 1998
Jim Caviezel looking ahead with teary eyes in The Thin Red Line – 1998
Image via 20th Century Studios

American soldiers land on Guadalcanal with orders to take a heavily defended hill from Japanese forces. The military objective is simple enough to explain on a map, yet Terrence Malick approaches the campaign through fragments of thought, memory, fear, nature, and spiritual doubt. Witt (Jim Caviezel) sees beauty in the island and wonders whether violence comes from one shared darkness. Welsh (Sean Penn) trusts nothing beyond immediate survival. Captain Staros (Elias Koteas) refuses to throw his men into a frontal assault that he believes will destroy them. Colonel Tall (Nick Nolte) sees the hill as the opportunity that may finally justify his career.

The Thin Red Line keeps asking what war looks like beside a world that continues growing, swimming, nesting, and shining around it. Grass moves while soldiers crawl through it. Birds scatter after gunfire. A captured Japanese soldier laughs and cries in the same breath while armed men stare back without knowing what to do with his grief. Malick returned to filmmaking after a twenty-year absence for this adaptation of James Jones’s novel, and the result rejects the usual rhythm of combat drama. Victory on the hill brings relief, shame, rage, and no permanent understanding. Witt eventually dies distracting enemy soldiers so others can escape.

Advertisement
Matthew Modine as Joker Davis crawling on the floor in Full Metal Jacket
Matthew Modine as Joker Davis crawling on the floor in Full Metal Jacket
Image via Warner Bros.

Full Metal Jacket, is based on The Short-Timers by Gustav Hasford. Before the Marines reach Vietnam, they are rebuilt inside Parris Island. Gunnery Sergeant Hartman (R. Lee Ermey) strips the recruits of privacy, language, and identity, reducing them to bodies that must obey before they can think.

There are two parts to this film. It is divided between training and war. It shows that the violence overseas begins with a system designed to break civilian instincts. And all that has consequences on the soldiers and duty officers. Joker (Matthew Modine) protects himself through humour. Cowboy (Arliss Howard) learns the rhythm of command. Leonard Lawrence (Vincent D’Onofrio), renamed Gomer Pyle, falls behind and becomes the target of Hartman’s humiliation as well as the platoon’s anger. The soldiers march away singing the Mickey Mouse Club song, and childhood sounds obscene after everything required to make them men.

Advertisement

3

‘Platoon’ (1986)

Charlie Sheen, Willem Dafoe, and Tom Berenger as soldiers look at the camera with a burning building behind in Platoon.
Charlie Sheen, Willem Dafoe, and Tom Berenger as soldiers look at the camera with a burning building behind in Platoon.
Image via Orion Pictures

Platoon follows Chris Taylor (Charlie Sheen) who drops out of college and volunteers for Vietnam. He’s convinced that serving beside working-class soldiers will give his life purpose. The jungle quickly destroys that romantic idea. Exhaustion, insects, fear, racism, drug use, and poor leadership divide the platoon long before the enemy can finish the job. Sergeant Elias (Willem Dafoe) still believes a soldier can retain some moral boundary. Sergeant Barnes (Tom Berenger) sees mercy as a weakness that gets people killed. Oliver Stone based the screenplay on his own service in Vietnam, and the conflict between those two men becomes the battle for Chris’s conscience.

The village raid is where that struggle becomes unbearable. Frustrated soldiers terrorise civilians after finding weapons and suspected collaborators. Chris lashes out, then recoils from what he is becoming. Barnes kills an unarmed woman and later murders Elias during a chaotic withdrawal, knowing the jungle will hide the truth. Willem Dafoe’s raised arms as Elias is shot from behind became the film’s defining image, but its power comes from everything leading there. Chris eventually kills Barnes after the climactic battle and survives long enough to understand that neither side of the platoon has left him. The war may be fought against an external enemy, but his closing reflection admits the harder fight was always among themselves.













Advertisement



















































Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?

Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Advertisement

Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.

🪜Parasite

🌀Everything Everywhere

☢️Oppenheimer

🐦Birdman

Advertisement

🪙No Country for Old Men

Advertisement

01

What kind of film experience do you actually want?
The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.





Advertisement

02

Which idea grabs you most in a film?
Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?





Advertisement

03

How do you like your story told?
Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.





Advertisement

04

What makes a truly great antagonist?
The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?





Advertisement

05

What do you want from a film’s ending?
The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?





Advertisement

06

Which setting pulls you in most?
Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.





Advertisement

07

What cinematic craft impresses you most?
Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.





Advertisement

08

What kind of main character do you root for?
The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.





Advertisement

09

How do you feel about a film that takes its time?
Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.





Advertisement

10

What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema?
The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?





Advertisement
The Academy Has Decided
Your Perfect Film Is…

Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.

Advertisement

Parasite

You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.

Advertisement

Everything Everywhere All at Once

You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.

Advertisement

Oppenheimer

You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.

Advertisement

Birdman

You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.

Advertisement

No Country for Old Men

You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.

Advertisement

2

‘Saving Private Ryan’ (1998)

Tom Hanks as Captain John Miller in a ruined town wearing his army helmet in Saving Private Ryan.
Tom Hanks as Captain John Miller in a ruined town wearing his army helmet in Saving Private Ryan.
Image via DreamWorks Pictures
Advertisement

Captain John Miller (Tom Hanks) and a small group of Rangers survive the Normandy landings, then receive an order to find Private James Ryan (Matt Damon) after his three brothers are killed in combat. The Army wants to spare one family from losing every son, but the men sent to retrieve him immediately question the cost. Why should several soldiers risk their lives for one stranger simply because his grief has become politically visible? Steven Spielberg places that argument after the Omaha Beach landing, where survival already feels random and every order carries bodies behind it.

The opening assault remains horrifying due to its refusal to organise death into inspiring images. Men drown under the weight of their equipment. A medic tries to hold a wounded soldier together. Miller’s hearing fades while chaos continues around him. The later journey gives each member of the squad enough personality for the mission’s arithmetic to become more painful. Wade (Giovanni Ribisi) dies calling for his mother. Mellish (Adam Goldberg) is slowly stabbed while Upham (Jeremy Davies) freezes nearby. Miller reaches the bridge and tells Ryan to earn what others spent for him. Decades later, the older Ryan asks whether he became a good man. The question has no fair answer, which is exactly why it breaks him, and the viewers. This is what makes it a masterpiece.

1

‘Apocalypse Now’ (1979)

Martin Sheen is muddy and looks anxious in Apocalypse Now.
Martin Sheen is muddy and looks anxious in Apocalypse Now.
Image via United Artists
Advertisement

In Apocalypse Now, Captain Benjamin Willard (Martin Sheen) is sent upriver through Vietnam and Cambodia to assassinate Colonel Walter Kurtz (Marlon Brando), a decorated officer who has rejected military command and built his own violent kingdom. Willard studies Kurtz’s record during the journey, reading evidence of brilliance, disobedience, and growing horror while the war around him becomes more surreal. The best part? It comes from Francis Ford Coppola (The Godfather).

Lieutenant Colonel Kilgore (Robert Duvall) orders a helicopter assault so his men can surf. A USO show turns women into objects before the crowd loses control. The Do Lung Bridge is rebuilt each night even though nobody knows who commands it. The photojournalist (Dennis Hopper) worships Kurtz through broken sentences, while Kurtz speaks about terror with the calm of someone who believes he has passed beyond ordinary judgment. There is no clean triumph waiting downriver. The film only reflects the knowledge that the system calling Kurtz insane created the road that led to him.


apocalypse-now-movie-poster-1.jpg
Advertisement


Apocalypse Now

Advertisement


Release Date

August 15, 1979

Runtime
Advertisement

147 minutes

Director

Francis Ford Coppola

Advertisement

Writers

Joseph Conrad, John Milius, Francis Ford Coppola, Michael Herr

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Cowboys Owner Jerry Jones Supports Tony Romo After Arrest

Published

on

New Details Emerge From Tony Romo Arrest for Driving While Intoxicated

Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones has thrown his full and unapologetic support behind his former quarterback, Tony Romo, in the wake of his July arrest on suspicion of operating a vehicle while under the influence.

“Been talking to him,” Jones, 83, told Fox 4 Dallas-Fort Worth’s Mike Doocy on Saturday, August 1. “I love him. I love what he’s about. I love his love of sport. He’s a very, very unique talent.”

Jones continued, “The real question is, and I don’t even have to think what the answer is: ‘Do you think Tony Romo knows how to get up when he gets knocked down?’ He’s had a life of that. And absolutely, that’s one of his greatest attributes is that he can handle adversity. This is something that he will work through.”

Romo, 46, was arrested on July 23 in Milwaukee after participating in the Wisconsin Amateur Championship golf tournament earlier that day. In addition to the DUI charge, the color commentator received a citation for “refusing to take a test for intoxication after arrest,” according to court documents obtained by Us.

Advertisement
New Details Emerge From Tony Romo Arrest for Driving While Intoxicated


Related: New Details Emerge From Tony Romo’s Arrest for Driving While Intoxicated

Surprising new details have emerged surrounding the arrest of former Dallas Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo.  Romo, 46, has been issued a citation for “refusing to take test for intoxication after arrest,” according to court records viewed by Us.  Us has reached out to Romo’s attorney for comment.  The former NFL star was arrested on Thursday, […]

He was also issued citations for having an “open bottle of an alcoholic beverage” on the passenger’s side of his Jeep and for passing vehicles in a “gore area,” which separates interstate traffic from cars entering from an on-ramp.

Advertisement

Romo allegedly failed field sobriety tests, as shown in body cam footage obtained by Us, and was taken into custody. An officer told the former NFL star that she believed he was intoxicated due to his “red glassy eyes” and an “odor of an intoxicating alcoholic beverage.”

Romo played for the Cowboys his entire NFL career, from 2003 to 2016, and was named to the Pro Bowl four times.

“He is a unique talent. His vision was just mesmerizing when he was a player,” Jones said on Saturday. “But he sees things and can articulate it so instantly. He’d walk out under center at a practice and the defense would have 12 people out there and it would take him about a second to say, ‘Coach, we’ve got 12 guys out here, get one of them off.’ He just sees it and then he has that skill. It’s made him a great, great portrayal of the story of football games.”

Advertisement
GettyImages-2285667977.jpg tony romo july 2026


Related: Tony Romo Had Open Bottle of Alcohol in His Vehicle During Arrest: Police

Former Dallas Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo had an open bottle of alcohol in his vehicle when he was arrested for suspicion of driving under the influence in Wisconsin, according to police.  An “open bottle of an alcoholic beverage” was found on the passenger’s side of Romo’s Jeep on July 23, according to one of three […]

After his arrest, Romo pulled out of his next scheduled golf tournament, the M&P Group Texas State Open in Tyler, Texas, held last week. He has a court date set for September 21.

The CBS NFL analyst has not commented publicly on his arrest. Us has reached out to his team for comment. CBS has since put him on leave.

“Tony Romo is on leave from his role at CBS Sports until further notice,” a CBS representative said in a statement to Us on Friday, July 31.

NFL Network insider Ian Rapoport reported later that day that JJ Watt would take Romo’s place on CBS and that the network would release its full roster of talent for the upcoming season at a later date.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Scott Eastwood Recalls On-Set Clash With Shia LaBeouf

Published

on

Los Angeles Premiere Of Amazon Prime apos s quot I Want You Back quot ROW DTLA - Los Angeles

Scott Eastwood is looking back on a tense moment from the set of “Fury.” In an interview, the actor recalled a confrontation with co-star Shia LaBeouf while filming a scene for the war movie, sharing how a misunderstanding escalated before it was brought under control. His remarks come after he called out an A-lister for backing out of a project at the last minute.

Los Angeles Premiere Of Amazon Prime apos s quot I Want You Back quot ROW DTLA - Los Angeles
MEGA

The 2014 war movie “Fury” was the first and only time Scott Eastwood and Shia LaBeouf worked together. They starred alongside other big names, including Brad Pitt, Jon Bernthal, Logan Lerman, and Michael Peña.

During the movie’s promotions, the tension between Eastwood and LaBeouf was widely reported, with co-stars sharing details of what went down behind the scenes. More than 10 years after the incident, Eastwood is sharing his recollection of the heated encounter with his co-star.

In an appearance on the podcast “Armchair Expert,” Eastwood told hosts Dax Shepard and Monica Padman that he was steered clear of LaBeouf after witnessing the lengths he went to to get into the character of a tank gunner, such as pulling out a tooth, cutting his cheek, and avoiding bathing.

“I remember thinking, ‘Okay. This guy’s crazy. I’m just gonna keep clear from this guy. I don’t play this game’,” Eastwood said. It was difficult to stay away from a co-star while working on a movie, though, and the dispute unfolded after filming a scene.

Advertisement

The Actor Claims His Co-Star Was ‘Having An Episode’

Eastwood acknowledged that LaBeouf was “clearly tormented,” and during the incident, he said the actor was “having an episode.”

LaBeouf called Eastwood out for “spitting tobacco” in the tank, and that was the latter’s breaking point. “I said, ‘F-ck you. Stop pulling your sh-t.’ I said, ‘I’m gonna whoop your a-s’,” Eastwood said, noting that afterward, LaBeouf became even more heated. Fortunately, their co-stars, including Pitt, managed to break up the fight before it escalated further.

Unbeknownst to LaBeouf, spitting tobacco was included in the script.

Advertisement

Eastwood said he understood LaBeouf’s process of method acting. However, he also said making a film is a collaborative effort. “Everyone’s doing a thing, but you can’t stop the train… And grow the f-ck up, you know?” he said.

The actor further said that everybody on set had “moments with Shia,” adding the entertainment industry “attracts psychopaths.”

Brad Pitt Shared Context To The Story In 2014

Pitt, who portrayed U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Don “Wardaddy” Collier in “Fury,” discussed the altercation in a 2014 interview, admitting that it may have started with him.

During the scene, he saw Eastwood spit into the tank, which irked him. “I’m starting to get hot, because this is our home, he’s disrespecting our home, you know?” Pitt told GQ. He called out Eastwood while the cameras were rolling and, in character, said, “You’re going to clean that sh-t up.” LaBeouf shared his sentiment, which sparked the dispute.

Advertisement

After the scene, Pitt said he approached Eastwood to explain what happened, only to later find out that he was in the wrong. The actor read the script that night and noticed it specifically stated Eastwood’s character was “chewing tobacco and spitting it on the back of the tank.”

“He was just doing as instructed in the script! So we were the knobs in the end,” Pitt said.

Shia LaBeouf Has A Reported History Of Friction With Co-Stars

Shia LaBeouf at UK film premiere, London
CAN/Capital Pictures / MEGA

LaBeouf has been involved in a few on-set tensions with co-stars, driven by clashes in personality or his extreme method acting. As The Blast previously reported, the actor was let go from “Orphans” due to his erratic behavior.

The former Disney star also had a conflict with Tom Hardy on the set of “Lawless,” with reports saying LaBeouf knocked out Hardy with a punch. The film’s director, John Hillcoat, confirmed that a physical altercation occurred, but nobody was knocked out. Years later, LaBeouf dismissed it as playful roughhousing rather than a real fight.

LaBeouf has been the subject of headlines in recent months due to a physical altercation in New Orleans. He was charged with three counts of battery and took a plea deal in June.

Advertisement

Scott Eastwood Called Out Another A-Lister

Stacy Poitras apos Art Gallery Exhibition For Documentary Premiere Of quot The Chainsaw Artist quot
MEGA

Eastwood’s comments about LaBeouf came after he went on “The Joe Rogan Experience” and called out an actor who pulled out of a project at the last minute, as The Blast reported.

He didn’t name the A-list actor, but noted that the production had to bear the financial burden of the decision simply because the actor didn’t want to work with someone else. “People get too famous for too long and think the world owes them something,” he noted.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Jaclyn Hill Became ‘Addicted to Being Thin’ on GLP-1 Journey

Published

on

Body Positive Influencer Carly Weinstein Opens Up About Using a GLP-1: ‘Embarrassed and Ashamed’

Influencer Jaclyn Hill got candid about her GLP-1 journey.

“I’m choosing strong over skinny💪🏼,” Hill, 36, wrote via Instagram on Sunday, August 2, alongside a before-and-after photo of her muscle gains. “I originally started a glp1 to lose those few extra stubborn pounds that wouldn’t seem to budge but like many others, I very quickly lost sight of my goals & became addicted to being thin,” she explained.

The makeup artist continued her caption, “I saw a number on the scale that I hadn’t seen since the days when I struggled to afford food & realized I had completely lost the plot.” Hill went on to share that she’s “gained 25 pounds back over the last 7 months” and remains focused on “strength training consistently.”

“I don’t think I’ve ever felt better honestly 🏋🏻‍♀️,” she concluded.

Advertisement
Body Positive Influencer Carly Weinstein Opens Up About Using a GLP-1: ‘Embarrassed and Ashamed’


Related: Body Positive Influencer Carly Weinstein Was ‘Ashamed’ to Use GLP-1

Influencer Carly Weinstein opened up about using a GLP-1 to lose weight after being a “body positive influencer.” “If you told me five months ago I’d be talking about this, I would tell you, ‘You’re crazy,’” she started off in a Tuesday, April 28, TikTok video. “I was so embarrassed and ashamed that I felt […]

Her celebrity friends and fans cheered her on in the comments section.

Advertisement

“Lookin strong 🔥🔥🔥,” Jessie James Decker wrote, while fitness influencer Emily Skye added, “Amazing work @jaclynhill 👏🏼 You should be very proud of yourself. 🥰.”

A third social media follower commented, “Strong over skinny ladies!! We need our muscles to be able to do everyday tasks when we’re older! 👏👏👏 wish more people would preach this!” Another person praised, “Girl you look so GOOD! So healthy. This is the best you’ve ever looked ❤️.”

Everything Influencer Janelle Rohner Has Said About Weight Loss Amid GLP 1 Controversy


Related: Health Influencer ‘Willing to Do a Refund’ for Fans Upset Over Her GLP-1 Use

Health and wellness influencer Janelle Rohner had been documenting her weight loss journey long before she admitted to using a GLP-1 to help her progress. The nurse initially kickstarted her wellness journey after giving birth to her two daughters, looking for solutions to shed the extra pounds she gained during pregnancy. After her progress stalled, […]

Hill previously opened up about her decision to use a GLP-1 via YouTube in May 2025. “I have done all different diets. I did keto for a minute. I did the animal-based diet. I never made it more than 20 days on a diet,” she shared. “I did heavy lifting, walking 10,000 steps a day. I tried cutting out carbs and I would not even lose half a pound.”

Advertisement

After talking to her doctor, Hill was prescribed a GLP-1, which helped her lose “10 pounds” in “three weeks.”

After staying on the medication for three months, she was down 20 pounds before embarking on her strength training physical transformation.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Copy Stassi Schroeder’s Butter Yellow Bag With This $26 Version

Published

on

Tracee Ellis Ross seen at 'The View' in Hudson Square on July 23, 2026 in New York City.

Us Weekly has affiliate partnerships. We receive compensation when you click on a link and make a purchase. Learn more!

Stassi Schroeder is never afraid of a good trend, but this one might be her chicest yet. The House of Stassi star stepped out in New York City carrying a handbag in a butter yellow hue, a style that’s quietly replacing black as fashion’s favorite neutral this summer. It’s bright without being loud, polished without feeling stuffy and, luckily for Us, you don’t need a designer budget to get the look.

Schroeder was spotted in Hudson Square on July 29, 2026, wearing an all-white outfit complete with a flowy blouse, wide-leg pants and matching pumps. However, her butter yellow croc-embossed bag is what stole the spotlight, adding just enough color to make the entire outfit feel fresh.

Advertisement

Get the Coraid Small Top-Handle Purse for $26 (was $29) at Amazon! Please note, prices are accurate at the date of publication, August 3, 2026, but are subject to change.

While we don’t know the exact designer behind Schroeder’s bag, the Coraid Small Top-Handle Purse delivers the same polished vibe for $26. The structured silhouette, faux croc-embossed leather and top-handle shape gives it that expensive-looking finish, making it hard to believe the affordable price tag.

Tracee Ellis Ross seen at 'The View' in Hudson Square on July 23, 2026 in New York City.


Related: Tracee Ellis Ross Just Gave the Raffia Bag a City-Girl Twist

Advertisement

Tracee Ellis Ross just gave the classic raffia bag a sophisticated, city-girl twist. Instead of saving the woven accessory for beach vacations, the actress styled it with polished separates, instantly elevating the piece for everyday wear. Luckily, you don’t need a designer budget to recreate her chic look. Ross was spotted in New York City […]

It’s not just pretty, either. The clever bag includes a detachable shoulder strap for hands-free wear, two interior compartments, a slip pocket and a magnetic snap closure to keep essentials organized.

An Amazon shopper who gave the purse a five-star rating admitted that it’s smaller than they expected, but it has “just enough room” for items like a cell phone, lipstick and more. It’s why we think this pick is ideal for everything from brunch dates to nights out.

The best part? Butter yellow plays surprisingly well with just about everything already hanging in your closet. It softens an all-black outfit, brightens white linen and gives blue denim an elevated feel. If the sunny shade isn’t for you, the purse also comes in black, pink, orange and several other colors.

Advertisement

No matter which shade you choose, fans pretty much approve of them all. One reviewer who opted for the red considers it a “super fun trendy bag.” They continued to say that it will “add the most perfect pop of color to outfits.” We tend to agree.

If you’ve been looking for one bag accessory that instantly makes summer basics feel more current, Schroeder may have convinced Us that butter yellow is the answer — and for $26, it’s an easy trend to try before everyone else catches on.

If Stassi convinced you to try butter yellow, keep scrolling for more chic Amazon bags.

Shop more butter yellow bag that we love:

Advertisement

Not your style? Explore more butter yellow bags here, and don’t forget to check out all of Amazon’s Daily Deals for more great finds!

UsNow Summer Sale Alert: These Chic Fashion Finds are over 30% off – Plus Free Shipping

Welcome to summer with our biggest sale of the year. This summer’s chicest dresses, tops and swimsuits are all over 30% + free shipping. Inventory is limited so hurry before they’re gone.

Shop the UsNow Summer Sale –>

Advertisement
Sofía Vergara attends the 2025 Vanity Fair Oscar Party Hosted By Radhika Jones at Wallis Annenberg Center for the Performing Arts on March 02, 2025 in Beverly Hills, California.


Related: Copy Sofia Vergara’s Greek Vacation Tank Dress Look for Just $20

Packing for a Greek vacation is one thing. Finding a dress that can handle sightseeing, long dinners by the water and every photo in between is another. Luckily, Sofia Vergara may have just found the ultimate suitcase staple — and you can steal the look for just $20. Vergara was recently spotted soaking up the […]

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Mario Lopez Deletes ‘Creepy’ AI Video ‘Sexualizing’ His Niece

Published

on

Mario Lopez at The 98th Academy Awards-Arrivals

Mario Lopez is facing backlash after sharing an artificial intelligence-generated video of his niece eating hot dogs at a Los Angeles Dodgers game. The “Access Hollywood” host posted the altered clip following Sunday’s Dodgers-Red Sox matchup, where he attended the game with his niece, Kalia Wong, who goes by YaYa. Although the video appeared to be intended as a joke, social media users quickly branded it “creepy,” with several critics accusing Lopez of placing his niece in an unnecessarily suggestive scenario. The post was ultimately flagged by X with a notice informing viewers that the footage was created using AI.

Mario Lopez at The 98th Academy Awards-Arrivals
MediaPunch / AdMedia / MEGA

The synthetic clip depicted Kalia eating two hot dogs while mustard and other toppings spilled onto her Dodgers jersey. Lopez’s voice could be heard narrating the moment as the AI-generated version of his niece smeared mustard and relish across her cheeks. “I can’t take her anywhere,” Lopez said in the clip.

The video then zoomed in on Kalia’s face as she continued spreading the condiments around. “Oh my God, look at you!” Lopez exclaimed. “You’re a mess, the mustard!”

“It’s so good!” Kalia yelled in response.

Advertisement

Lopez also posted the video to his Instagram Stories, where he wrote, “My niece is out of control!” However, it has since been deleted.

It is unclear from the information provided who generated the footage or which AI tool was used to create it.

The unusual visuals quickly caused confusion among viewers who initially appeared unsure whether they were watching real footage from the baseball game. X later added a notice indicating that readers had identified the clip as AI-generated.

The disclosure clarified why Kalia’s actions and the video’s overall appearance seemed unnatural. However, it did little to quiet the criticism directed at Lopez for sharing it.

Advertisement

AI tools can manipulate authentic photographs and videos to make people appear to perform actions that never occurred. In this case, the altered footage placed Lopez’s real-life niece at the center of a fictional scene.

Critics Called Mario Lopez’s Post ‘Creepy’

Mario Lopez at The Harold And Carole Pump Foundation 25th Anniversary Celebrity Dinner held at The Beverly Hilton Hotel in Beverly Hills
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

Journalist Yashar Ali was among the social media users who publicly questioned why Lopez would share the clip. “Uhhhh, what a creepy video for Mario Lopez to create using AI and then post… Especially since the subject is his niece!” Ali wrote.

Other viewers argued that the imagery appeared suggestive and inappropriate, regardless of whether Lopez intended the post to be humorous. “Using AI to sexualize your niece is weird and disgusting,” one critic said. Another user wrote, “Using Grok to double dog your niece is f-cking wild, man.”

Someone else took to X to write, “Hey man, remember when you once said parents supporting their trans kids is ‘dangerous?’ Curious how you feel about uncles using AI in a sexually fetishizing way towards their nieces.”

Some Viewers Wondered Whether Mario Lopez Was Hacked

Mario Lopez at the Los Angeles Premiere Of Focus Features' 'The Bikeriders'
Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA

The post appeared so out of character to some viewers that they questioned whether Lopez had uploaded it himself. Several users speculated that his social media account could have been compromised, although no evidence of a hack was provided.

One person described their confusion after realizing that the woman in the altered footage was Lopez’s actual niece. “I was so confused what the f-ck was this, until I realized this is his ACTUAL niece, and this is a video he generated showing her double stuffing two hot dogs in a weird fetishy way,” the user wrote. “Mario Lopez making weird incest AI slop def not on my bingo card this year.”

Advertisement

However, the available information does not establish that Lopez intended to sexualize his niece or personally generated the clip. Still, his decision to publish the video under his name left viewers demanding an explanation.

Alongside the controversial AI post, Lopez shared an authentic video showing him and Kalia enjoying Sunday’s baseball game together.

The real clip confirmed that the uncle and niece attended the Dodgers-Red Sox matchup, but the exaggerated actions shown in the AI version did not occur in the genuine footage described.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Aaron Rodgers Calls Anthony Fauci ‘Coward’ for Covid Response

Published

on

Aaron Rodgers Most Controversial Moments Through the Years Vaccine Drama 9 11 Questioning and More

Aaron Rodgers — who was criticized for refusing to adhere to the NFL’s COVID-19 protocol at the height of the pandemic — is attacking Dr. Anthony Fauci following the physician’s contentious Senate hearing on the government’s response to the public health crisis.

“I’m going to plead the fifth, like that absolute coward, Tony Fauci,” Rodgers, 42, said while appearing on the Monday, August 3, episode of ESPN’s The Pat McAfee Show. “Absolute coward. Yeah. Are you kidding me? You got a pardon, and you pleaded over 100 times at the White House?” (Fauci, 85, received a preemptive presidential pardon from former president Joe Biden on January 20, 2025.)

The NFL quarterback continued, “What are you scared of, Tony? I thought you were the science. I thought you were, ‘I am science,’ and you get up there and you can’t answer a question?”

On July 29, Fauci declined to answer numerous questions during a fiery Senate hearing on the origins of COVID and the government’s handling of the pandemic. In prepared remarks, the On Call: A Doctor’s Journey in Public Service author said he wanted to avoid the very real possibility that Republicans would use portions of his testimony to potentially prosecute him for perjury. (Republican lawmakers have long threatened to prosecute Fauci for his role in the COVID-19 response. In the wake of his Senate hearing, Republican Sen. Rand Paul has scheduled a vote on a resolution that would hold the scientist in contempt of Congress, per Politico.)

Advertisement
Aaron Rodgers Most Controversial Moments Through the Years Vaccine Drama 9 11 Questioning and More


Related: Aaron Rodgers’ Most Controversial Moments Through the Years

Aaron Rodgers is one of the best-ever quarterbacks to play in the NFL, but it’s often his antics off the field that get the most people talking. Rodgers — who was the Green Bay Packers superstar quarterback for 18 seasons before joining the New York Jets in April 2023 — came under fire in November […]

Rodgers also appeared to take aim at various networks who spent time covering his own controversial remarks regarding the pandemic — and his refusal to obtain the safe and effective COVID vaccine — at the height of the crisis.

Advertisement

“How much time did the network spend on that? How much time did they spend on my responses every week, on my vaccination status? On Taylor [Swift] and Travis [Kelce’s] wedding? Did they do even a minute?” he argued. “Did they do even a minute on Tony Fauci? Nah I bet they didn’t.”

Rodgers sparked controversy in November 2021 when he tested positive for COVID-19 and admitted he was unvaccinated, despite previously telling reporters he was “immunized.” He was ordered to pay $14,650 for breaking the NFL’s COVID-19 protocols.

After Fauci’s Senate hearing testimony, Rodgers believes people should be less focused on his and other players’ personal lives and more on issues that impact the nation.

“Writing in his diary about how fun it is to be famous. You got to be kidding me,” the Pittsburgh Steelers quarterback told host Pat McAfee. “Seriously, what are they going to say about me now? Now you can’t talk about the COVID stuff because obviously it was made, you know, in a lab in China. That’s not even questionable anymore. Tony Fauci is an absolute criminal.” (There is no definitive proof or scientific finding that has determined COVID-19 was purposefully made in a lab.)

In a diary entry from May 2020, Fauci wrote about the ramifications of becoming a household name during the pandemic. At no point, despite Republican claims, did the immunologist write that he wished to find fame as a result of the deadly pandemic.

“The situation with my national and international fame is explosive and really unimaginable,” he wrote via USA Today. “It is not [hyperbole] to say that today I am the most famous and talked about person in the country and one of the most recognizable [person] in the world.”

Advertisement

During his rant, Rodgers also made a point to remind viewers that he’s “on good terms” with his family.

“What are you gonna say now?” he asked, pointing to the media coverage of his family’s previous estrangement as another point of contention for the quarterback.

In July, Aaron made headlines when he shared photos with his once estranged mom Darla Rodgers, dad Ed Rodgers and brother Luke Rodgers. (It’s unclear where Aaron stands with his brother and The Bachelorette alum Jordan Rodgers.)

“It’s been a great, great life and a great career, and it’s nice to be sitting on this side now, especially after that coward pleaded the Fifth over 100 times,” Aaron said of his family and when referencing Fauci once again. “Why couldn’t you, uh, answer one question the entire time?”

Advertisement
Meghan McCain Slams Dr Anthony Fauci Testimony From Senate Hearing


Related: Meghan McCain Slams Dr. Anthony Fauci’s Testimony From Senate Hearing

Advertisement

Meghan McCain is not impressed with Dr. Anthony Fauci’s testimony during a contentious Senate hearing. “Dr. Fauci belongs in jail,” McCain, 41, wrote via X on Wednesday, July 29. “Filet him, Rand Paul.” Before the hearing began, Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rand Paul told reporters that he thinks the American people “would be very […]

In a statement to Us, Fauci’s attorney highlighted his client’s 54 years of public service at the National Institutes of Health, where the physician “established a lengthy record of cooperation with Congressional oversight and inquiries, including frequent testimony in both the Senate and the House during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.”

“The circumstances surrounding Dr. Fauci’s appearance today before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, pursuant to a subpoena issued by Committee Chairman Rand Paul (R-KY), regrettably made his continued cooperation impossible,” the statement read. “For that reason, on the advice of his legal counsel, Dr. Fauci asserted his right under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to decline to answer questions.”

The statement continued, “Dr. Fauci devoted his lengthy career to saving millions of lives globally through scientific discovery and sound public health policy. The accusations that Chairman Paul continues to propagate are false and disgraceful, and we will examine all options to hold him accountable.”

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025