Crypto World
Samourai Wallet Co-Founder’s New Transfer Followed 30-Day Hold
Samourai Wallet co-founder Keonne Rodriguez says he is facing yet another prison transfer after a drug treatment program at FCI McKean was deactivated, threatening the availability of the rehabilitation program he had been counting on to potentially shorten his sentence.
Rodriguez, who is serving a five-year federal term following a guilty plea tied to an alleged unlicensed money-transmitting business, said on X that McKean’s warden told program participants that Rodriguez and roughly 70 others would be moved to institutions where treatment would still be available. He entered the program because completing it could reduce his sentence by up to a year.
Key takeaways
- Keonne Rodriguez says FCI McKean shut down the drug treatment program he relied on for possible sentence reduction.
- Rodriguez claims McKean officials told program participants—him and about 70 others—that they would be transferred to facilities where treatment remains available.
- The transfer risk comes alongside broader U.S. legislative efforts to clarify whether non-custodial crypto developers should be treated as financial intermediaries.
- Congressional momentum for the CLARITY Act has stalled recently after a failed Senate effort to advance the bill.
Rehabilitation disruption at FCI McKean
Rodriguez said the most recent setback began when the program at FCI McKean was deactivated. He wrote that McKean’s warden informed the group that he and dozens of other participants would be moved to different federal facilities where treatment is still offered.
According to Rodriguez, his decision to enter the program was driven by the potential sentencing benefit: completing the treatment could, he said, reduce his term by as much as a year. With the program turned off at McKean, the practical question for him is whether the next facility will keep the promised pathway to sentence reduction within reach.
Earlier, Rodriguez described the movement between prisons as far more punishing than the distance might suggest. In a letter published by The Rage, he called the transition from FPC Morgantown to McKean the “absolute worst 30 days” of his life and said his request to make the roughly four-hour trip himself was denied.
From Morgantown to a “federal transfer” flow
Rodriguez’s account depicts a system built around transfers rather than continuity of routine. He said inmates leaving Morgantown were placed in ankle shackles and handcuffs attached to waist chains. He then described being taken by bus to an airport and flown to the Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City.
At the Federal Transfer Center, Rodriguez said he was housed with prisoners from different security classifications and spent much of his time locked in a cell. He described the experience in stark, prison-era language, saying he wondered whether “all the circles of hell” were contained within the federal transfer facility.
He also said that eventually he was assigned a cell with an inmate serving a murder sentence and that he was given only part of a foam mattress. Rodriguez stated that the setup left part of his body resting on a metal bunk overnight.
Rodriguez later faced another major procedural milestone: he is serving time after pleading guilty in a case involving Samourai Wallet’s operations. The U.S. Department of Justice said in a release that Rodriguez and co-founder William Lonergan Hill transmitted more than $237 million in criminal proceeds through the service.
Sentencing context and what Rodriguez claims is at stake
Rodriguez is currently serving a five-year sentence, and he has been vocal about conditions and the operational uncertainty that comes with prison transfers. The new claim about McKean’s treatment program matters because it directly affects whether he can stay enrolled in a structured course that, he says, could reduce his sentence.
His account also underscores a broader reality for incarcerated people: even when rehabilitation is available at one facility, a change in programming can force a relocation—sometimes on short notice—where eligibility and access may differ.
Rodriguez’s statements also echo a theme that has repeatedly appeared in federal criminal cases involving crypto: the practical consequences of how a defendant’s sentence interacts with institutional rules, program availability, and transfer logistics.
Legislative backdrop: developer protections still unresolved
The prison news arrives while lawmakers continue wrestling with how U.S. rules apply to crypto developers, particularly in situations where developers do not control users’ assets.
According to a recent report on the CLARITY Act, the latest Senate draft retained provisions intended to protect non-controlling developers from certain money-transmission requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act. However, the legislative effort has not advanced smoothly: Cointelegraph reported that the Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act on Sept. 15 after a procedural vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to move the legislation forward.
That contrast—ongoing legal uncertainty for developers in Washington alongside Rodriguez’s real-world account of how institutions can change course—highlights a persistent issue for the industry: while policy debates continue, compliance expectations remain uneven, and the consequences can extend well beyond code and into enforcement and sentencing.
The CLARITY Act’s stalled progress means that questions about regulatory treatment—especially around whether certain developer behaviors could be interpreted as financial intermediation—remain unresolved for the moment. Even if the bill’s drafting language includes protective measures, the key uncertainty for builders and users is whether legislation will actually move, and how any final framework would be applied.
For Rodriguez, the immediate thing to watch is whether his next facility preserves access to the treatment program he says could reduce his sentence. More broadly, industry readers should monitor how the CLARITY Act debate evolves in the Senate, because the outcome will shape how investors, developers, and compliance teams plan for what the law requires.
The practice gained traction after the National Zoo received giant pandas from Beijing in the wake of President Richard Nixon and First Lady Pat Nixon’s historic trip to China in 1972, which marked a new, positive chapter in U.S.-China relations.
China claims ownership of nearly all the giant pandas in the world, even their offspring, and controls who receives them. Beijing eventually shifted from gifting giant pandas to leasing them to other countries in 1984 as the animal’s population dwindled, but the practice continued and spread to other nations like Austria, Canada, and Malaysia. China regularly considers loaning pandas an act of goodwill—even when the host nation typically foots the bill of about $1 million annually for a pair.
A giant panda’s presence or absence in a country tends to represent ebbs and flows of its relationship with China. For instance, amid tensions with Japan over Taiwan, Tokyo returned two giant pandas to Sichuan on loan in January, marking the first time Japan does not have a giant panda since 1972, when China-Japan ties first normalized. In 2010, two U.S.-born panda cubs returned to China, days after Chinese officials warned then-President Barack Obama against meeting the Dalai Lama, whom Beijing considers a separatist.
Bitcoin is consolidating, trading at $84,342 on Friday and unchanged since midnight UTC, while almost everything else in the market is climbing, with 93 of the 100 CoinDesk 100 constituents higher over the past 24 hours and the CoinDesk 80 up 4.7% against the CoinDesk 5’s 1.0%.
The rotation follows the pattern of previous cycles, in which capital moves into more speculative bets once bitcoin has run hard and stalled, with the cost of holding a long position through elevated funding pushing traders to rotate.
Bitcoin has climbed from below $63,000 in August to almost $87,000 on Tuesday and has gone sideways since, and altcoins are benefitting as a result, CoinMarketCap’s altcoin season index reading 56 out of 100 against 45 a week ago and 38 a month ago, its highest in more than three months.
Chainlink , internet computer (ICP) and bittensor (TAO) drove the CoinDesk Computing Index (CPUS) 9.5% higher over 24 hours, with the DeFi Select Index (DFX) up 8.7%, both more than three times the blended benchmark’s 2.5%.
Why the choir camaraderie? One reason: singing together is a low-cost, inclusive activity. Plus, recent studies show that singing with others helps bolster social cohesion, as well as providing numerous physical benefits, from lowering blood pressure and cortisol levels to bolstering lung health. Group singing is on the rise, and it couldn’t have come at a better time.
Dr. Frank Russo, a psychology Professor at Toronto Metropolitan University, who studies the science behind what happens physically, mentally, and to our sense of connection when we sing together, pointed to the recent World Cup as an example.
“Thousands of people who may never have met are synchronizing their voices, movements, and attention around a shared identity. For a few minutes, they behave almost like a single coordinated social unit,” he says, explaining that by singing together, fans bolster their connection and collective identity. “People sing because they feel united, but the act of singing may make them feel more united.”
Bitcoin has held near $84,000 while long-term holders take moderate profits and exchange balances decline, leaving improving on-chain signals without a confirmed recovery.
Summary
- Bitcoin long-term holders are realizing 72% profits, far below December 2024’s roughly 350% peak levels.
- Exchange reserves fell 1.03% as 12,153 BTC left trading platforms between September 17 and 23.
- Bitcoin open interest dropped 10.4% from September 21, while funding eased to 0.00570% by Thursday.
- September 22 produced 19,105 BTC outflows alone, meaning weekly withdrawals were not consistently dominant overall.
- Spot Bitcoin ETFs drew $191 million September 24, extending their net inflow streak to six.
CryptoQuant contributor Darkfost said in his September 25 analysis that long-term BTC holders are currently realizing profits of roughly 72%. His comparison puts the figure well below the nearly 350% profit level recorded in December 2024, when long-term-holder gains were much closer to previous cycle extremes.
CoinGecko currently places BTC near $84,403, with a 24-hour trading range between roughly $82,941 and $84,843. The market tracker shows BTC up around 10.3% over seven days after the rebound from September’s lower levels.
Are long-term Bitcoin holders starting to sell heavily?
Darkfost does not describe the current activity as aggressive distribution. The analyst said long-term holders tend to react less to short price swings than short-term holders, making their realized profits useful for tracking selling pressure during larger market moves.
His data place current realized profits near 72%, compared with approximately 350% in December 2024. Darkfost described the current phase as moderate and said similar readings have appeared during earlier bear-market periods, when long-term holders were less motivated to unload large positions immediately.
The 72% figure does not mean long-term holders have sold 72% of their BTC. It measures the profit performance associated with coins being spent by that cohort, which CryptoQuant defines through holding-age metrics.
Darkfost’s interpretation is that holders could continue waiting for higher profit levels before heavier selling emerges. His view remains an analyst assessment based on historical behavior, not a forecast that long-term holders will refuse to sell if market conditions change.
The distinction is relevant after BTC rallied from roughly $75,000 to above $87,000 within days. As crypto.news reported in the earlier $84,000 Bitcoin analysis, BTC has already faced two rejections around the $87,000 region while ETF demand and large-holder accumulation continued below the surface.
Bitcoin is leaving exchanges, but one day drove much of it
Exchange flows give another constructive reading, though the weekly pattern is less uniform than a headline net-outflow figure suggests.
CryptoQuant analyst CoinNiel reported in the latest exchange-flow analysis that exchanges recorded 12,153 BTC in net outflows between September 17 and September 23. The previous week had produced 6,142 BTC in net inflows, reversing the direction of the weekly figure.
CoinNiel cautioned that September 22 accounted for approximately 19,105 BTC in withdrawals by itself. His data therefore show that net outflows did not dominate every session during the seven-day period.
Exchange reserves moved lower at the same time. CoinNiel measured total reserves at roughly 2.726 million BTC on September 21 before they dropped to a provisional 2.698 million BTC on September 24, a decline of approximately 1.03%.
His analysis does not treat every withdrawal as a purchase. Coins can leave exchanges for private custody, transfers between institutions, collateral management or other purposes, so reserve declines alone cannot establish fresh spot demand.
A separate Binance reading adds more detail. As crypto.news reported earlier on September 25, Darkfost tracked more than 13,800 BTC leaving Binance on its largest daily net-outflow reading since 2023. Binance reserves fell from around 705,000 BTC to 685,000 BTC over four days.
Darkfost associated the Binance withdrawals with accumulation, while crypto.news noted that netflow data cannot identify the reason every holder moved coins. The Binance figure and CoinNiel’s all-exchange dataset measure different scopes, so the two readings should not be combined as one total.
Falling leverage is removing some pressure from Bitcoin
Derivatives data show leverage cooling after BTC’s move above $87,000.
CoinNiel reported that Bitcoin open interest fell from approximately $29.34 billion on September 21 to a provisional $26.29 billion on September 24. The 10.4% decline occurred as BTC pulled back from its recent high.
The analyst cautioned that open interest is measured in dollar terms, meaning part of the decline can come from changes in BTC’s price. CoinNiel therefore said the full drop cannot be attributed solely to traders closing leveraged positions.
Funding rates cooled as well. CoinNiel measured average funding near 0.00662% during the previous week before it increased to 0.00777% between September 17 and 23. The provisional September 24 reading then dropped to 0.00570%.
Lower funding reduces the cost of maintaining leveraged long positions compared with the previous readings. CoinNiel described the combination of easing funding, lower open interest and exchange withdrawals as “encouraging” but stopped short of treating it as proof of a renewed uptrend.
The change follows a period when leverage expanded quickly during BTC’s rebound. Crypto.news previously reported that leverage was rising as Bitcoin moved through $85,000, with futures traders adding more than $2 billion in positions after spot ETF demand helped start the rally.
Why Bitcoin’s recovery is still missing one confirmation
Spot demand remains the unresolved part of CoinNiel’s assessment. The CryptoQuant analyst said falling reserves and lower leverage create a better setup, but stronger evidence of persistent spot buying would be needed before describing BTC’s recovery as confirmed.
ETF activity provides one source of measured spot demand. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs received another $191 million on September 24, extending their net inflow streak to six consecutive sessions. As previously reported by crypto.news in the September 25 Bitcoin price report, BlackRock’s IBIT received roughly $163 million during the session while Fidelity’s FBTC took in approximately $12.86 million.
The six-day sequence followed much larger inflows earlier in the week. Crypto.news reported approximately $999 million on September 21, $714.7 million on September 22 and $346.98 million on September 23 before daily inflows moderated to $191 million.
ETF subscriptions have therefore remained positive even as BTC failed to stay above $87,000. CoinNiel’s exchange analysis still calls the recovery unconfirmed because ETF flows represent only one part of total spot-market activity.
His downside test is more direct. CoinNiel said renewed exchange inflows combined with rapidly increasing funding and open interest would weaken the current cautiously constructive reading. The analyst plans to watch whether exchange withdrawals persist once September 24 figures are finalized and whether spot buying becomes clearer.
Bitcoin’s derivatives market faces another large reset on September 25. Coinbase Markets data cited by crypto.news show roughly $18.1 billion in combined BTC and ETH options scheduled for quarterly expiry, with Bitcoin call open interest concentrated around the $90,000 and $100,000 strikes.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
This debate also coincides with proposed changes to Section 106, a clause in the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 that requires federal agencies to assess how development affects historic sites, which are decades in the making. If these changes are enacted, federal land, where Native Nations hold consultation rights under extant law, could theoretically become terrain AI data center developers could claim without a federal review process.
More than 700 organizations, including Native Nations, have already signed a letter opposing this change to Section 106—but this isn’t the first time it has been targeted.
Near the end of President Donald Trump’s first term, the Secretary of the Interior issued Secretarial Order 3389, exempting major energy and land-management projects from standard Section 106 review. It was a move the Biden administration noticed early on and swiftly reversed.
The current Advisory Council on Historic Preservation rewrite picks up where that order left off, and is part of energy, transmission, and mining’s long game to weaken Section 106 as a source of delay for infrastructure—one that predates the AI boom by years.
Samourai Wallet co-founder Keonne Rodriguez has said he faces another federal prison transfer after a drug-treatment program at FCI McKean was deactivated.
Summary
- Rodriguez says FCI McKean ended his treatment program, triggering another transfer with roughly seventy inmates.
- Completing the federal drug program could cut Rodriguez’s five-year sentence by up to twelve months.
- His previous transfer from Morgantown to McKean took thirty days despite a four-hour driving distance.
- DOJ says Samourai transmitted more than $237 million in criminal proceeds through its privacy services.
- Senate CLARITY legislation containing developer protections failed to advance on a 49–50 procedural vote September.
Rodriguez’s September 24 post on X says the prison warden informed program participants that he and roughly 70 other inmates would be transferred to facilities where the treatment remains available. The Federal Bureau of Prisons had not published a separate notice confirming McKean’s program shutdown at the time of reporting, so the transfer details come from Rodriguez’s account.
Why is Rodriguez facing another prison transfer?
Rodriguez entered the Residential Drug Abuse Program, or RDAP, because successful completion can reduce an eligible federal inmate’s sentence. The BOP explains that eligible participants may receive an early-release reduction after completing the residential treatment program.
For sentences of 37 months or longer, current BOP policy allows an early-release reduction of up to 12 months. Rodriguez is serving five years, making that maximum theoretically relevant if he satisfies the program’s eligibility and completion requirements. The reduction is not automatic because the BOP retains authority over eligibility and the amount granted.
Rodriguez said he had only recently settled into FCI McKean when inmates learned the treatment program would no longer continue there. His account says participants now expect reassignment to institutions that still offer RDAP.
An older BOP program-location guide listed a residential drug program at McKean, although the agency’s public materials reviewed for this report do not independently confirm the September 2026 deactivation Rodriguez described.
His last four-hour transfer took 30 days
The prospect of another move follows what Rodriguez described as a month-long transfer from FPC Morgantown in West Virginia to FCI McKean in Pennsylvania.
In a September 24 letter published by The Rage, Rodriguez said the facilities were approximately a four-hour drive apart. His transfer instead began June 10 and involved buses, two flights and a stop at the Federal Transfer Center in Oklahoma City.
Rodriguez said he requested permission to make the journey through a transfer furlough because he had minimum-security status and had self-surrendered to begin his sentence. He wrote that officials denied the request without explanation on June 8. Those descriptions are his personal account and have not been independently confirmed by the BOP.
During the transfer, Rodriguez said officers placed him in ankle restraints and handcuffs secured to a waist chain before taking him by bus to an airport. He described passing through detention facilities with inmates from different security classifications and spending long periods inside cells.
Rodriguez called the journey the “absolute worst 30 days” of his life. He wrote that he shared one cell with a man serving a murder sentence and described sleeping on part of a foam mattress while part of his body rested on the metal bunk.
The BOP says prison placement and transfers can depend on security classification, bed availability, program needs, medical requirements and other factors. Federal law directs the agency to consider housing inmates reasonably close to their primary residences when practicable, but programming needs can affect placement decisions.
Samourai case ended with five- and four-year sentences
Rodriguez is serving a five-year sentence after pleading guilty in August 2025 to conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money-transmitting business. Co-founder William Lonergan Hill received four years.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York said Samourai transmitted more than $237 million in traceable criminal proceeds through its services. Prosecutors linked the funds to darknet markets, fraud, cybercrime, sanctioned jurisdictions and other offenses.
Samourai offered Whirlpool, which mixed Bitcoin transactions, and Ricochet, which inserted extra transaction hops between sending and receiving addresses. Prosecutors said more than 80,000 BTC, then valued above $2 billion, moved through the services after their launches.
Judge Denise Cote sentenced Rodriguez on November 6, 2025. The court imposed three years of supervised release after imprisonment and a $250,000 fine. Rodriguez and Hill paid approximately $6.37 million in forfeiture representing Samourai fees, according to the Justice Department.
As crypto.news previously reported, Rodriguez later sought public donations after saying legal expenses left him more than $2 million in debt. He said at the time that he was still seeking presidential clemency while preparing to begin his sentence.
Developer protections remain unresolved after CLARITY vote
Rodriguez’s case has continued to appear in U.S. debates over when developers of non-custodial crypto software can face money-transmission obligations.
The final Senate CLARITY Act text released September 14 contained provisions derived from the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. Senator Cynthia Lummis’s office said the language would shield qualifying developers from money-transmission registration requirements and create a civil safe harbor.
As crypto.news previously reported, Coin Center had urged lawmakers to preserve protections for non-custodial blockchain developers. The advocacy group argued that software developers who never control customer assets should not automatically be treated as money transmitters.
The Senate did not advance H.R. 3633 on September 15. The official roll call shows the cloture motion failed 49–50, short of the three-fifths threshold required to proceed.
Lawmakers gave different reasons for opposing the measure. Republican Senator Susan Collins said the legislation required more study, including questions over community-bank deposits. Democratic senators including Catherine Cortez Masto and Angela Alsobrooks cited unresolved concerns over ethics, illicit-finance enforcement and other provisions.
The failed procedural vote left the proposed developer language unenacted. Rodriguez’s conviction and sentence remain governed by the law and judgment already entered in his criminal case.
For Rodriguez, the immediate issue is administrative rather than legislative. His latest account says the BOP must designate another institution where he can continue the treatment program tied to his potential sentence reduction. No destination or transfer date had been publicly disclosed when his September 24 update was published.
It would be more profitable for the average investor to buy a 10 year US government bond than to become a typical landlord. Indeed, this relative profitability is at its highest level since July 2007.
Negative housing spreads occur when the interest rate “spread” between low-risk US Treasuries are outperforming the risky operations of renting-out real estate.
Specifically, the US 10-year Treasury yield-to-maturity closed at 5.11% on Wednesday and pushed further to 5.18% on Thursday.
An oil shock and borrowing spree during the US war with Iran helped push Treasury bond yields to bizarre heights this year.
A recent rate hike from the Federal Reserve then catapulted yields past the 2007 housing bubble.
Last week, Chairman Kevin Warsh announced the Fed’s first hike in three years, and his committee’s own projections for an additional increase to their Fed Funds Rate this year.
Read more: US 20-year bond auction just had its worst showing ever
Negative housing spreads cause rental investment collapse
Nick Gerli, CEO of a real estate data firm, posted a chart drawing more than 250,000 views with a simple statement: Real estate for cash flow has a negative opportunity cost relative to government bonds.
According to his calculation, 10-year Treasuries above 5.1% easily beat the 4.8% single family house rental cap rate.
That 4.8% figure is one of many benchmarks for after-cost returns on rental properties. Individual property owners might earn double-digit returns during great years with minimal repairs, and then lose money the next year amid unexpected costs or low occupancy. Real estate returns vary drastically.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Yuga Labs’ 0xQuit said the NFTs are safe and will be returned once the risk passes, while holders were urged to revoke NFT permissions.
A single account for currencies, digital assets and commodities can simplify trading, but a tidy interface says little about what sits underneath.
Compare how each product is structured, priced, executed and governed – not the length of the instrument list.
Why crypto-native traders are looking beyond crypto
For traders used to crypto markets, adding currencies or gold can broaden the set of market drivers they follow. The scale is different too: the BIS 2025 Triennial Central Bank Survey recorded average OTC foreign-exchange turnover of $9.6 trillion per day in April 2025.
More markets do not automatically mean better diversification
Bitcoin, a technology-stock CFD and a high-beta currency may all fall when risk appetite fades. Diversification depends on correlations, position sizes and how those relationships change – not the number of symbols on screen.
Why product structure matters
“Buying gold” could mean owning a security, trading a futures contract or taking a leveraged CFD position. Crypto access might involve the underlying asset or a derivative with no wallet withdrawal. Before comparing forex and crypto trading, identify what is actually traded, who the counterparty is, how the position is margined and whether it expires or incurs overnight financing.
What “multi-asset trading platform” should mean in practice
Market access and instrument availability
Ask for the exact instrument schedule available in your country. “Stocks” may mean shares or CFDs, while “forex” may cover rolling spot-style products rather than futures. Compare trading hours, contract size, quote currency and what happens to orders when the underlying market is closed.
As crypto-native traders add currency and commodity exposure, providers increasingly compete on consolidated market access and risk tools. The 1xTrade trading platform is one example of this approach. As with any provider, traders should independently confirm which products are available in their jurisdiction and review the applicable costs, execution terms and legal disclosures before opening an account.
One interface versus one risk model
A unified online trading platform should show total margin use and exposure across asset classes. Test whether order tickets behave consistently, profit and loss are converted clearly into the account currency, and stops can be reviewed alongside exposure elsewhere.
Check 1: Execution and order handling
Why FX execution is different from a centralised exchange
Crypto traders may expect one visible order book, but retail OTC FX commonly involves dealer pricing. The BIS analysis of the 2025 FX execution landscape describes a decentralised, fragmented market in which spot and most FX derivatives trade over the counter; dealers internally match more than 80% of customer trades.
Ask how market orders, limits and stops are handled, whether slippage can be positive as well as negative, and what happens during gaps or connection failures. Evaluate execution quality using fill records, not a speed slogan or demo alone.
Check 2: Total trading costs
Spreads, commissions and overnight costs
Trading platform fees should be assessed for a realistic holding period. Add the bid–ask spread, commission, overnight financing or swap, currency-conversion charge and any market-data or inactivity fee. Then review deposit and withdrawal charges. A narrow headline spread may still produce a higher all-in cost for a position held for several days.
Check 3: Risk controls before leverage
Position sizing, stops and exposure limits
Leverage increases market exposure relative to deposited capital, amplifying losses as well as gains. A stop can constrain an intended exit but cannot guarantee its price in a fast or gapping market. Useful controls, therefore, include a pre-trade margin preview, position-size input, account-wide exposure view and clear liquidation rules.
Before placing an order:
- Set the maximum account loss for the trade in cash, not just percentage points.
- Calculate the size from the stop distance and contract value.
- Check the combined exposure of correlated positions.
Check 4: Funding and withdrawals
Read the operational terms before funding. Confirm supported currencies and rails, identity checks, minimums, fees, processing windows and whether withdrawals must use the original method. Test a small withdrawal early. “Processed” is not “received” when a bank, card network or blockchain adds another settlement step.
Check 5: Legal, jurisdictional and product disclosures
Trading platform due diligence starts with the exact contracting entity – not the brand name. Check that entity on the relevant regulator’s official register, then match its permissions to the product and your location. Corporate registration alone does not establish financial-services authorisation.
The CFTC’s retail forex advisory tells US customers to research OTC dealers before depositing, verify CFTC registration and review NFA disciplinary history. Wherever you live, read the client agreement, execution policy, risk disclosure, complaints route and rules on client-money protection before opening an account.
A practical multi-asset platform checklist
| Factor | What to verify | Why it matters |
| Market access | Exact products available in your jurisdiction | Familiar asset labels can hide different legal structures |
| Execution | Order types, pricing model, slippage and execution disclosures | Fills affect real cost and exit quality |
| Costs | Spread, commission, financing, conversion and withdrawal charges | Headline pricing rarely captures the full cost |
| Risk controls | Stops, sizing, margin rules and exposure tools | Small market moves can become large account moves |
| Legal status | Entity, jurisdiction, permissions and restrictions | The protections must match the actual provider and product |
| Withdrawals | Processing terms, verification and fees | Access to capital is part of platform usability |
Final thoughts: Convenience should not replace due diligence
The right trading platform 2026 is one whose products, costs and rules you can explain before committing capital. Apply the same checklist to every forex trading platform and crypto trading platform considered. A unified workflow matters only if it makes exposure, execution and obligations easier to see.
Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.
Key takeaways
- Uniswap retreated after climbing to an intraweek high of approximately $10.95.
- UNI’s weekly RSI has entered overbought territory at around 73.
- A correction could target $7.83, while losing that support may expose $6.91.
Uniswap (UNI) could decline toward $7.80 over the coming weeks after its latest rally lost momentum near a major resistance area.
An overbought weekly Relative Strength Index (RSI), a rejection below the $11.51 Fibonacci level and a concentration of leveraged long positions below the market all point to an elevated risk of a correction.
UNI traded near $9.11 on September 25 after reaching an intraweek high of roughly $10.95. Although its longer-term technical structure has improved, the token may need to cool further before attempting another sustained advance.
UNI Rally Loses Momentum Below $11.50
Uniswap’s recent rebound brought the price close to the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement level at approximately $11.51. That area represented an important upside target following UNI’s breakout above a long-term descending resistance trendline.
However, the token failed to reach or break the level convincingly. Sellers emerged around $10.95, pushing the price back toward $9.11 and leaving a substantial upper wick on the developing weekly candle.
A long upper wick typically signals that buyers drove the price higher during the period but could not hold those gains. While this pattern does not guarantee a reversal, it indicates that selling pressure has increased near the recent high.
The rejection is especially relevant because it occurred close to major Fibonacci resistance. Unless UNI can reclaim the $10.95-$11.51 region, traders may treat the latest move as an unsuccessful breakout attempt rather than the beginning of another sustained rally.
Overbought RSI raises correction risk
Momentum indicators also suggest that Uniswap’s advance may be becoming stretched. UNI’s weekly RSI has risen to around 73, placing it above the traditional overbought threshold of 70.
An overbought RSI does not automatically mean that a sell-off is imminent. During strong trends, cryptocurrencies can remain overbought for extended periods while prices continue rising. Nevertheless, UNI’s previous sharp weekly rallies have frequently been followed by consolidation or multi-week corrections as traders lock in profits.
The combination of an elevated RSI, resistance near $11.51, and the recent upper wick strengthens the possibility of a short-term pullback.
The first major technical target on the downside is the 200-week exponential moving average at approximately $7.83. A decline from $9.21 to that level would represent a correction of about 15%.
If buyers defend the $7.80-$7.85 area, UNI could establish a higher low and prepare for another attempt at $11.50. Losing that support, however, would expose the 100-week EMA near $6.91.
Despite these near-term risks, Uniswap’s broader chart remains healthier than it was earlier in the year. UNI is still trading above several important weekly moving averages and has broken through a long-term descending resistance line. A pullback to $7.83 could therefore function as a retest of support rather than the start of a larger bearish reversal.
Derivatives positioning creates an additional source of downside pressure. CoinGlass data shows a significant cluster of leveraged long positions around $8.87 on Binance’s UNI/USDT market.
Approximately $5.16 million in liquidation leverage is concentrated near that price. If UNI falls toward $8.87, the move could expose an estimated $10.35 million in cumulative long liquidations.
When a leveraged long position is liquidated, the exchange closes it automatically by selling the underlying exposure. If many positions are forced to close in a short period, that selling can accelerate the decline and trigger further liquidations at lower prices.
This dynamic makes $8.87 a potential liquidity magnet. A modest pullback toward that level could develop into a sharper move if forced selling overwhelms available demand.
The liquidation heatmap also identifies short-position liquidity above the current market, meaning that an unexpected rally could still generate a short squeeze. However, the larger concentration of vulnerable longs immediately below the price makes the downside risk more pressing in the near term.
Can UNI recover toward $11.50?
Uniswap’s next move may depend on whether buyers can protect the $8.87 liquidity zone and the stronger technical support around $7.83.
A successful defense of these levels would preserve the improving weekly structure and leave UNI positioned for another test of $11.50. A decisive weekly close above that resistance would weaken the correction scenario and could open the door to higher targets.
Conversely, a liquidation-driven decline below $8.87 would increase the probability of a move toward the 200-week EMA at $7.83. If that floor also breaks, the 100-week EMA near $6.91 would become the next significant downside level.
For now, UNI’s longer-term recovery remains intact, but overbought momentum and crowded leveraged positioning suggest that volatility—and potentially a 15% correction—could come first.
Steve Sarkisian says Trump departure cut Miami headset communication during CFP title game
Lightspeed targets $250M for new India fund, focusing on early-stage AI
Here’s What Cumin’s Actually Made From
-
Fashion7 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Talbots – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World2 days agoGoldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank Agree: The S&P 500 Rally Isn't Over
-
Tech4 days agoResearchers escape OpenAI Codex sandbox to run commands on host
-
Fashion23 hours ago8 iPhone Accessories That Add Personality
-
Crypto World4 days agoWho Needs CLARITY Anyway? ARB Could See 70X Increase: Hodler’s Digest
-
Crypto World6 days agoCircle launches Arc Studio AI agent for building onchain apps
-
NewsBeat7 days agoTrump says US has reached an agreement to take permanent control of Greenland’s security
-
Crypto World7 days agoTrading Bitcoin on Robinhood? Why 2% Spread Has Traders Worried
-
Tech6 days agoTrump suggests rebranding AI with a new name, says he’s also creating an AI Force
-
Crypto World6 days agoBitcoin price breaks channel as RSI climbs to 63
-
Business4 days agoAnalog Devices (ADI) Bets $1.35 Billion on Chips that Let Machines Think for Themselves
-
Tech4 days agoGoogle’s $899 Googlebook is a bet that you’ll buy a new laptop for Gemini
-
Crypto World4 days agoCoinbase, Robinhood, Circle Seen as Tokenized-Stock Winners
-
Crypto World2 days agoThis Bearish Netflix Stock Trade Can Cash In On Video Streaming Giant’s Woes
-
Business2 days agoOil Price Today (September 23): Crude oil below $100 on hopes of US-Iran talks. What did Trump say?
-
Crypto World3 days agoTrump-Xi Polymarket Odds for Handshake Hit 50%
-
Crypto World6 days agoWorld Money launches in 150+ countries with Stripe
-
Entertainment2 days agoThese 17 Fall Amazon Dresses Seriously Look Like Anthropologie
-
Crypto World1 day agoCrude Oil Prices Pressured by Diplomatic Hopes in the Middle East
-
Crypto World7 days agoSilver prices recover quickly, hitting weekly high today
You must be logged in to post a comment Login