Federal Budget

The Federal Government publishes the spending and revenue numbers on a monthly basis. The charts and tables below give an in-depth review of the Federal Budget, showing where the money is coming from, where it

“We responded by bringing three things together that have never co-existed in our brand: the complete design freedom of coachbuilding, our powerful, near-silent all-electric powertrain, and a uniquely potent yet serene expression of open-top motoring.”

GQG Partners, which has been bullish on the Adani group for quite some time, selectively increased its exposure to key group companies during the January-March quarter, even as stock performance was mixed. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) and domestic institutional investor Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) largely held steady or trimmed their stakes.

Shareholding data for the March quarter shows GQG marginally increasing its stakes in multiple Adani companies. Its holding in Adani Energy Solutions rose from 4.79% to 4.88%, while in Adani Green it increased from 4.31% to 4.54%. In Adani Enterprises, the group’s flagship entity, GQG’s stake edged up from 3.87% to 3.90%.

These incremental increases signal continued conviction from the marquee investor, which had emerged as a key backer of the Adani group during periods of heightened volatility.

However, in Adani Power, GQG’s stake saw a slight dip from 4.82% to 4.8%, while in Adani Ports, it remained broadly stable at around 2.26%.

In contrast, FIIs showed signs of caution. Their holdings declined in several key companies during the quarter. In Adani Energy Solutions, FII ownership dropped sharply from 13.47% to 12.23%. Adani Enterprises also saw a reduction from 11.64% to 10.8%, while Adani Green witnessed a slight dip from 11.42% to 11.1%.

The trimming was in line with the broader sentiment of foreign investors in Indian stocks, which they have been dumping for the past year.
LIC, one of the largest domestic institutional investors, largely maintained its positions across most Adani companies, with only minor adjustments. Its stake in Adani Ports declined slightly from 6.79% to 6.63%, while holdings in companies such as Adani Enterprises, Adani Energy and Adani Green remained unchanged. This steady stance reflects a long-term holding approach rather than tactical allocation shifts.Mutual funds, meanwhile, showed renewed commitment with increasing exposure across several stocks. Holdings in ACC rose from 7.84% to 8.01%, while Ambuja Cements saw a notable jump from 8.15% to 8.92%. Adani Power and Adani Green Energy also recorded modest increases.

Despite these shifts in ownership, stock performance across the Adani group has been mixed so far in CY26. Adani Power has been a standout, delivering gains of around 22.9%, supported by strong sectoral tailwinds in thermal power. Adani Energy has also performed well, rising about 12.5%, while Adani Green is up nearly 7%.

On the other hand, several key stocks have lagged. ACC has declined about 18%, while Ambuja Cements is down roughly 20%, reflecting weakness in the cement segment and margin pressures. Adani Enterprises has slipped around 6.8%, and NDTV has seen a similar decline of about 20%. Adani Ports has remained largely flat, indicating a lack of strong directional momentum.

GQG’s continued accumulation in select Adani stocks appears to be a strategic bet on long-term fundamentals, particularly in infrastructure and energy-linked businesses. At the same time, the cautious stance of FIIs suggests that global investors are still evaluating risk-reward dynamics, especially given the group’s capital-intensive expansion plans and evolving regulatory landscape.

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

SYDNEY — Australia’s fuel crisis, triggered by disruptions from the US-Israel conflict with Iran and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, continued into mid-April 2026 with hundreds of service stations still reporting shortages, diesel prices exceeding $3 per litre in many areas and economists warning of growing recession risks if supply restrictions become necessary later this year.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen stated this week that Australia holds approximately 38-39 days of petrol reserves, 29-31 days of diesel and about 30 days of jet fuel, with 57 ships carrying more than 4.1 billion litres of fuel secured through May. However, regional areas and the transport sector face ongoing pain, with diesel shortages particularly acute for farmers, truck drivers and miners who keep the economy moving.

As of early April, the number of service stations without diesel had fallen from peaks above 400 to around 173-312 nationwide, depending on daily reporting, with New South Wales hardest hit at times with over 180 stations affected. Hundreds more ran dry on unleaded petrol in rural and outer suburban locations. Panic buying earlier in the crisis exacerbated the situation, though government appeals for normal purchasing habits helped stabilise some queues.

The crisis stems from Australia’s heavy reliance on imports. The nation sources about 90% of its refined fuel from Asian refineries that depend on crude oil passing through the Strait of Hormuz, which handles roughly one-fifth of global supply. Disruptions since late February or early March, including cancelled or delayed shipments and reduced refinery output in Singapore, South Korea and Malaysia, created a lag effect now biting into domestic availability. Even with a reported ceasefire in the Iran conflict, experts say repairs to damaged infrastructure mean full supply recovery could take months.

Petrol prices surged from around $1.80 per litre pre-crisis to averages near $2.20-$2.50, while diesel climbed sharply toward or past $3 in affected regions — a jump of 50% or more in weeks. A typical family’s weekly fuel bill rose by $20-$30 or higher, adding thousands annually for heavy users. The government halved fuel excise tax for three months, providing roughly 26-32 cents per litre relief at the pump, and released portions of national stockpiles while temporarily relaxing fuel quality standards to broaden import options.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s administration activated elements of its four-stage National Fuel Security Plan. The country currently operates in a heightened “plan and prepare” or voluntary conservation phase, encouraging carpooling, reduced unnecessary travel and efficient driving. Stage three could involve prioritising fuel for essential services such as emergency vehicles, food transport, agriculture and mining if shortages worsen. The government has underwritten spot-market purchases by major suppliers Ampol and Viva Energy at inflated prices and holds powers to direct distribution toward vulnerable regions.

Farmers and the transport industry bear the brunt. The National Farmers’ Federation warned of potential food price hikes up to 50% if diesel shortages disrupt planting, harvesting and distribution. Truck operators face viability threats, with some reports suggesting up to 70% could struggle without relief. Fertiliser shortages compounded by higher transport costs add pressure on agriculture. Qantas responded by cutting domestic flight capacity 5% and warned of jet fuel costs ballooning to $3.1-$3.3 billion for the half-year.

Retail giant Wesfarmers, owner of Bunnings, Kmart and Target, paused delivery fees on eligible orders until September to ease cost-of-living strain on customers. Used electric vehicle prices rose as some motorists reconsidered combustion engines amid sustained high fuel costs.

Economist Shane Oliver of AMP warned that prolonged disruptions could tip Australia toward recession in the second half of 2026. While immediate price spikes hurt households, the real danger lies in physical shortages forcing usage restrictions that ripple through supply chains, inflation and business confidence. The International Monetary Fund flagged broader global energy crisis risks with potential stagflationary effects.

Critics, including opposition figures and industry groups, pointed to long-term vulnerabilities: Australia once operated eight domestic refineries but now has only two — Ampol’s Lytton in Brisbane and Viva Energy’s Geelong facility — meeting less than 20% of needs. The country holds far below the International Energy Agency’s recommended 90-day reserve obligation, a gap highlighted in past warnings. Calls grow for boosting local production, including accelerated development of the Taroom Trough oil fields in Queensland, where test wells show promise but commercial output may not flow until 2028 at earliest.

In response, the government pursues diplomacy with Singapore, Malaysia and Brunei to secure additional refined fuel. A $20 million public campaign urges fuel conservation. Transport Minister Catherine King confirmed ongoing efforts to support heavy vehicle operators through reduced road user charges.

Regional impacts vary. Urban centres in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane see sporadic outages but generally better access, while country towns sometimes face multi-day dry spells at the single local servo. Some stations imposed purchase limits during peak disruption. Vigilante-style complaints about alleged price gouging emerged, though the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission monitors retailers.

Despite challenges, Bowen and Albanese stressed that no expected April shipments failed to arrive and new orders replaced cancellations. They encouraged Easter and school holiday travel to proceed normally, though many families adjusted plans to shorter trips or public transport where possible.

Broader economic effects include rising goods prices as transport costs feed into groceries and retail. Confidence among households and businesses dipped sharply. Some analysts note a silver lining in accelerated interest in electric vehicles, with second-hand EV values climbing.

Longer-term solutions under discussion include incentives for domestic refining and storage expansion, greater biofuel or hydrogen integration, and stronger strategic reserves. Queensland Premier David Crisafulli highlighted his state’s potential role in boosting local oil output and refining capacity.

As the crisis enters its second month, the Albanese government faces balancing short-term relief with preparations for possible extended “long tail” disruptions even if Middle East tensions ease. Treasurer Jim Chalmers prepares talks with international counterparts on energy security.

Motorists are advised to fill up responsibly, combine trips and consider alternatives like public transport or remote work where feasible. For businesses, contingency planning around logistics remains essential.

The situation underscores Australia’s exposure at the end of global supply chains. While immediate reserves and secured shipments provide a buffer into May, the coming weeks will test resilience as Asian refinery constraints potentially tighten further. Government, industry and consumers alike watch developments in the Middle East and Asian fuel markets closely.

For the latest station availability and prices, drivers can check apps and websites from major fuel networks or the Australian Institute of Petroleum. Authorities continue monitoring and stand ready to escalate measures if needed to keep essential services running.

The fuel crisis of 2026 serves as a stark reminder of energy security’s importance in a geopolitically volatile world. Australia’s response will shape economic outcomes well beyond the current disruptions.

A widening gap between heavily regulated states and those with lighter rules is increasingly shaping where businesses choose to operate, as compliance costs and administrative hurdles weigh on growth.

JAMIE DIMON SAYS NEW YORK, OTHER CITIES FACE WORKER ‘EXODUS’ AS LAWMAKERS PUSH HIGHER TAXES

FOX Business’ Madison Alworth joined FOX Business’ Stuart Varney on “Varney & Co.” to report on how regulatory burdens are influencing economic decisions across the country.

Recent data from the Cato Institute highlights how states like New Jersey, California and New York rank among the most restrictive, while states in the Midwest and Plains regions offer more business-friendly environments. That divide is becoming more pronounced as companies gain flexibility to relocate operations.

For some business owners, the pressure is immediate. Outer Realm CEO Dhara Patel, who previously ran a virtual real estate touring company in New York City, described the toll of constant compliance demands.

WHITE HOUSE LAYS OUT FIXES FOR HOUSING AFFORDABILITY PROBLEM

“I swear, sometimes I don’t sleep because I’m like… Did I do this? Did I submit this paperwork?… It’s exhausting when they’re adding new compliance, that new annual report that they’re requiring,” Patel said.

She ultimately moved her business to Florida, citing both regulatory complexity and tax savings as key factors.

“New York made it so complicated, the amount of reports that you have to file, the new paperwork and everything like that,” she said.

Economists say the broader impact extends beyond individual firms. Regulation can function as an added cost to businesses, limiting time and resources that would otherwise go toward expansion.

BILLIONAIRES AND BUSINESSES FUEL GROWING EXODUS FROM BLUE STATES

“Regulation is like a tax. It’s a cost that businesses have to pay in order to do business in a state… More regulation means slower growth,” expert John Lonski said.

He added that higher regulatory burdens tend to coincide with slower economic growth, as businesses and workers gravitate toward less restrictive environments.

The contrast underscores how regulatory environments are increasingly shaping where businesses choose to operate and grow.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

At a meeting of the local authority’s executive on Tuesday, MacBeath said the scheme aimed to move beyond emergency aid by helping families become more financially “resilient”, offering advice on managing money, accessing benefits, reducing debt and finding work.

Follow

Q4: 2026-04-14 Earnings Summary

EPS of -$0.60 misses by $0.20

 | Revenue of $33.63M beats by $1.62M

Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) Q3 2025 Earnings Call December 17, 2025 5:00 PM EST

Company Participants

Oliver Roll – Chief Marketing & Communications Officer
Scott Beck – Co-Founder, President, CEO & Director
Paul Seamon – Chief Financial Officer
Patrick Gelsinger – Executive Chairman & Head of Technology

Advertisement

Conference Call Participants

Richard Baldry – ROTH Capital Partners, LLC, Research Division
Yun Suk Kim – Loop Capital Markets LLC, Research Division
Jason Kreyer – Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division
Daniel Kurnos – The Benchmark Company, LLC, Research Division
Eric Wold – Texas Capital Securities, Research Division
Ryan Meyers – Lake Street Capital Markets, LLC, Research Division

Advertisement

Presentation

Operator

Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Gloo Fiscal Third Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Oliver Roll, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer. Please go ahead.

Advertisement

Oliver Roll
Chief Marketing & Communications Officer

Thank you, operator. And thank you to all of you for joining our fiscal third quarter 2025 earnings conference call. We will be discussing Gloo’s performance for the third quarter ended October 31 2025, as well as providing guidance for the fiscal fourth quarter 2025 and fiscal year 2026.

Joining me on today’s call are CEO and Co-Founder, Scott Beck, and CFO, Paul Seamon. Our Board Chair and Head of Technology, Pat Gelsinger, will also join the Q&A session.

Before we begin, please be reminded that this call will contain forward-looking statements which are based on Gloo’s current expectations, but which are subject to risks and uncertainties relating to future events and/or the future financial performance of Gloo. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. A discussion of some of the risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from

Advertisement

The US’s Artemis II mission aims to enhance lunar exploration, foster international collaboration, and prepare for Mars, driving scientific innovation and technological advancement.

---

Key Points

• The US is returning to the Moon with Artemis II to advance lunar exploration, foster international collaboration, and prepare for future Mars missions.
• This initiative promotes scientific innovation and technological development.

The United States is set to return to lunar exploration with the Artemis II mission, which aims to build upon previous missions while fostering international collaboration and laying the groundwork for future endeavors, particularly missions to Mars. This renewed commitment is emblematic of a broader space policy that recognizes the Moon as a strategic staging ground for deeper space exploration.

Artemis II marks a pivotal step in NASA’s Artemis program, which endeavors not only to advance scientific knowledge but also to stimulate technological innovation. By working alongside international partners, the mission aims to create a collaborative model reflecting the global nature of space exploration. This collaboration can enhance mission safety, share costs, and pool expertise, making the exploration of the Moon—and eventually Mars—more feasible and effective.

The intent behind returning to the Moon is multifaceted. Firstly, the Moon serves as an accessible laboratory for testing new technologies and systems essential for human exploration beyond Earth. For instance, the Artemis missions will evaluate life support systems and habitat construction in a relatively close, yet challenging extraterrestrial environment. Secondly, lunar exploration promises to yield valuable scientific data that can expand our understanding of the Moon’s geological history and its potential resources, such as water ice, which could sustain life and fuel future space missions.

Moreover, the Artemis II mission is seen as a stepping stone for setting a sustainable presence on the Moon. This endeavor will facilitate the establishment of a lunar base, which could support longer stays and more complex missions, whether for scientific research or commercial purposes. Ultimately, this groundwork is not only aimed at returning humans to the lunar surface but is also critical for the ambitious goal of sending astronauts to Mars in the coming decades.

Through Artemis II and subsequent missions, the US is demonstrating its resolve to lead in space exploration while inspiring a new generation of scientists, engineers, and astronauts, thus promoting a vision of sustained human presence in outer space.

Read the original article : Why is the US going back round the Moon with Artemis II? A space policy expert explains

Other People are Reading

CUPERTINO, Calif. — Apple’s iPhone 18 Pro Max is shaping up as one of the most compelling flagship upgrades in years, with leaks pointing to a powerful 2nm A20 Pro chip, a groundbreaking variable aperture main camera, a significantly smaller Dynamic Island and potentially record-breaking battery life when it arrives alongside a new foldable iPhone in September 2026.

Industry analysts and supply chain sources say the device will retain the familiar 6.9-inch LTPO OLED display with 120Hz refresh rate but introduce meaningful internal and photographic enhancements that could sway buyers waiting for the next big leap. While full under-display Face ID appears delayed, partial sensor integration could shrink the front cutout dramatically, giving the screen a cleaner, more immersive look.

The star of the rumored upgrades is the A20 Pro processor, built on TSMC’s advanced 2nm manufacturing process. This marks a significant efficiency jump from the 3nm A19 Pro in current models, promising roughly 15% better performance and up to 30% improved power efficiency. Combined with 12GB of RAM integrated directly onto the chip wafer, the iPhone 18 Pro Max is expected to handle demanding AI tasks, gaming and multitasking with less heat and longer endurance.

Battery life stands out as a major highlight for the Pro Max variant. Multiple reports indicate a capacity boost to between 5,100 and 5,200 mAh — the largest ever in an iPhone — enabled by a slightly thicker chassis measuring around 8.8mm. The extra space, paired with the more efficient A20 Pro chip and optimized power management, could deliver up to 40 hours of mixed-use battery life, according to supply chain projections. For users who rely on their phones for all-day productivity, streaming and photography, this upgrade alone could prove transformative.

Photography enthusiasts have particular reason to watch the iPhone 18 Pro Max closely. Reliable analyst Ming-Chi Kuo reports that the main 48-megapixel Fusion camera will feature a variable aperture mechanism for the first time on an iPhone. This mechanical iris will let users — or the computational photography system — dynamically adjust the amount of light entering the lens, improving low-light performance while preventing overexposure in bright conditions and offering greater control over depth of field for professional-looking portraits. The triple-lens rear setup is also expected to include upgraded 48MP ultrawide and telephoto sensors, continuing Apple’s push toward higher-resolution imaging across the board.

On the front, leaks suggest a smaller Dynamic Island achieved through partial relocation of Face ID components beneath the display. While complete under-screen Face ID and camera remain challenges for mass production, moving some infrared sensors underneath could reduce the pill-shaped cutout by a reported 35%, with the selfie camera potentially shifting to a discreet top-left punch-hole. The display itself is expected to maintain or slightly improve peak brightness, potentially exceeding 2,500 nits, along with enhanced color accuracy and efficiency.

Design-wise, the iPhone 18 Pro Max is likely to stick close to the current titanium-framed aesthetic but with fresh color options. Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman has reported that Apple is testing a striking “deep red” finish — a rich, dark burgundy tone that would mark the first red Pro model in years and replace the cosmic orange hero color from recent generations. Traditional black may continue to be absent for a second year, with the lineup emphasizing bolder, more vibrant hues enabled by the aluminum or refined titanium construction.

Connectivity gets a boost with Apple’s in-house C2 modem, promising better 5G performance, improved Wi-Fi and Bluetooth via a new N2 chip, and possible enhancements to satellite features, including expanded emergency capabilities or even basic web browsing over satellite in remote areas. Storage options are rumored to top out at 2TB, giving power users ample room for high-resolution video, apps and AI-generated content.

Pricing is expected to hold steady despite rising component costs, with the iPhone 18 Pro Max likely starting at $1,199 as Apple aims to maintain accessibility for its premium segment. This stance aligns with analyst Ming-Chi Kuo’s predictions that the company will avoid significant increases for the Pro lineup.

Apple’s 2026 release strategy represents a notable shift. The fall event will focus on the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max and the long-awaited foldable iPhone — expected to feature a roughly 5.5-inch outer screen that unfolds to about 7.8 inches internally. Standard iPhone 18 and more affordable models, possibly including an iPhone 18e, are reportedly delayed until spring 2027. This staggered approach allows Apple to prioritize its most advanced hardware while managing supply chain demands for the ambitious foldable debut.

The absence of a base iPhone 18 in September has sparked discussion among fans and analysts. Some see it as a smart way to spotlight the Pro models and the foldable without diluting attention, while others worry it could confuse buyers accustomed to a full annual lineup. Regardless, the Pro Max remains the flagship many enthusiasts target for its larger screen, superior camera system and extended battery.

Early dummy models and prototype leaks circulating on social media and YouTube channels show a refined camera bump with more rounded edges and a slightly more integrated look. The overall footprint stays similar to the iPhone 17 Pro Max, preserving the device’s substantial but manageable size for one-handed use where possible.

AI and software integration will likely play a bigger role, with the A20 Pro’s enhanced Neural Engine powering more sophisticated on-device processing for features like advanced photo editing, real-time translation and personalized Siri capabilities. While exact iOS 20 details remain under wraps, the hardware foundation suggests Apple is preparing its ecosystem for deeper artificial intelligence experiences without relying heavily on cloud computing.

Community reaction on forums and tech sites has been enthusiastic yet tempered with the usual caution that surrounds pre-launch rumors. Many users express excitement over the variable aperture camera, viewing it as a long-overdue nod to serious photographers who want more creative control directly from their phones. Others highlight the battery gains as a potential game-changer for travelers and heavy users tired of mid-day charging.

Skeptics point out that some ambitious features, such as full under-display Face ID, have been rumored for several generations without materializing, suggesting Apple prioritizes reliability and quality over rushed innovation. Supply chain sources emphasize that while late-stage production for the Pro models is ramping up, certain elements like the variable aperture assembly still require fine-tuning.

As excitement builds toward the expected September unveiling, the iPhone 18 Pro Max rumors underscore Apple’s commitment to incremental yet meaningful progress. The combination of a more efficient 2nm chip, superior imaging tools and extended battery life positions the device as a strong evolution rather than a revolutionary redesign — exactly the formula that has sustained the iPhone’s dominance for nearly two decades.

For consumers weighing an upgrade from older models, the Pro Max could represent a worthwhile jump, particularly in camera versatility and all-day reliability. Those holding iPhone 16 or 17 Pro Max units may find the changes subtler but still compelling for future-proofing against growing AI demands and high-resolution content creation.

Apple has not commented on the rumors, and official details will only emerge at the fall event. In the meantime, supply chain leaks from trusted voices like Ming-Chi Kuo, Mark Gurman and various Weibo analysts continue to paint an increasingly clear picture of a polished, high-performance flagship.

Whether the deep red color, variable aperture lens or massive battery proves the biggest draw, the iPhone 18 Pro Max is already generating buzz as a device that refines Apple’s formula while addressing some of the most common user requests for better endurance and photographic flexibility. With roughly five months until launch, anticipation continues to mount for what could be one of the strongest Pro Max offerings yet.