Connect with us

Business

California AG Rob Bonta blasts Paramount-WBD merger as ‘illegal’

Published

on

California AG Rob Bonta blasts Paramount-WBD merger as ‘illegal’

California Attorney General Rob Bonta believes Paramount’s planned takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) is simply “an illegal merger,” as he appears to be on a crusade to prevent it from happening. 

Paramount CEO David Ellison is seeking to acquire WBD in a $111 billion deal expected to close during the third quarter of this year. But the mega-merger has irked critics who fear combining two major Hollywood studios would hurt the industry while giving too much power to Ellison’s Paramount.

Advertisement

Bonta on Monday led a group of 12 state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit challenging the merger, claiming it would “lead to higher prices, lower quality, and less content for film and television, harming movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences on every sofa and movie theater seat in the U.S.” 

PARAMOUNT ADVISERS PUSH FOR CALIFORNIA EXIT AS STATE SUES TO BLOCK WARNER BROS DISCOVERY MERGER: REPORT

California Attorney General Rob Bonta

California Attorney General Rob Bonta. (Sarah Reingewirtz/MediaNews Group/Los Angeles Daily News via Getty Images / Getty Images)

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District for the Northern District of California, claims that the merger violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which holds that mergers that may substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly are illegal. 

“We determined that law was being broken with respect to three markets, when it comes to wide-release theatrical films, their distribution, the distribution of top-grossing films, blockbusters if you will, and also with respect to the licensing of cable channels to cable distributors,” Bonta said on Matthew Belloni’s “The Town” podcast

Advertisement

“It’s our duty to analyze the different markets and make a decision based on each about whether antitrust law is violated or not,” he continued.

Bonta said he feels there is a very “strong case” in the three markets defined in the lawsuit. He said consolidation in those areas gives a small number of people too much power when it comes to dictating terms to movie theaters and cable providers, which could drive up prices while reducing quality.  

CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR POINTS TO ‘HEMORRHAGING’ AT CBS TO WARN OF DAVID ELLISON’S POTENTIAL TAKEOVER AT CNN

Paramount Warner Bros.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta believes Paramount’s planned takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery is simply “an illegal merger.”  (AaronP/Bauer-Griffin/GC Images / Getty Images)

“This is about affordability, and this is about everyday people’s ability to enjoy and experience some of the joys of life, a movie, a TV series, at home, through cable or satellite… at a movie theater for a night out. This merger will make that experience, the quality, less, and make it eroded, and it will make the price higher,” Bonta said. 

Advertisement

Belloni asked why streaming giants that also produce movies and television shows, such as Netflix, Apple and Amazon weren’t mentioned in the lawsuit, as Paramount has suggested the merger would put the company in a better position to compete with streaming giants. Belloni noted that 48 percent of viewing in America occurred on streaming services last month, compared to 22 percent for cable channels. 

“We looked at all the impacts … and the streaming market is different, and the cable market is different than the theatrical release market, and each one has its own independent analysis and where we landed was three clean markets where the impact of the merger is presumptively illegal based on a clear threshold that the law has defined,” Bonta said. 

Paramount stated in a Monday press release that the “practical effect of this lawsuit is to shield those dominant streaming platforms like Netflix and technology companies from much-needed competition while preventing the significant benefits this transaction will deliver for consumers, creators, workers, and the broader Hollywood economy.”

After Belloni read the statement aloud, Bonta said it was “painful to hear,” and dismissed the notion that Paramount is “helping” consumers or workers. 

Advertisement

“It’s self-serving, and it’s just not true,” Bonta said, adding that he will not allow a company to do “illegal things” from an antitrust perspective just to compete with streaming giants. 

PARAMOUNT, SKYDANCE COMPLETE $8 BILLION MERGER AS FCC CONTINUES CBS PROBE

New Paramount CEO David Ellison

Paramount CEO David Ellison. (Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Bonta was then asked about a Semafor report that Ellison could potentially move Paramount of California if the state continues to hold up the merger. 

“To threaten a state that is simply doing its job in enforcing the law here, it felt like a somewhat desperate, last-ditch effort to blackmail the states into allowing an illegal merger to go through. And that’s just not going to happen,” Bonta said. 

Advertisement

Paramount fired back shortly after the complaint was filed, saying the lawsuit “reflects a fundamentally flawed application of the antitrust laws and is wrong on both the facts and the law.”

“We will vigorously defend the transaction and demonstrate that this challenge is inconsistent with sound competition policy and the competitive realities of the media marketplace. Delaying this transaction will only harm entertainment workers who have already suffered over recent years as technology has disrupted their livelihood and cost California tens of thousands of entertainment jobs,” a Paramount spokesperson said in a statement to Fox News Digital.

“The combination of Paramount and WBD will create a stronger, well-capitalized, creative-first media company that is better positioned to compete with companies like Netflix that have come to dominate the industry for audiences, premium content, and creative talent,” the spokesperson continued. “Put simply, any attempt to block this transaction undermines the very principles antitrust law is designed to promote: more competition, more choice for consumers, and more opportunities for creators and workers.”

The Paramount spokesperson said the company will “continue to fight against any attempt to derail” the historic deal.  

READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS

Ellison, the son of billionaire Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, took control of Paramount last year when Skydance Media and Paramount Global completed an $8 billion merger. Adding WBD to his portfolio would make the younger Ellison one of Hollywood’s most powerful people.

The Justice Department (DOJ) on Friday announced it has closed its antitrust investigation into Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of WBD, concluding the transaction is not likely to harm competition or American consumers. However, state attorneys general retain independent authority under antitrust laws, and the DOJ’s decision does not itself prevent additional legal challenges to the proposed transaction.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Baytex Energy: Organic Growth With Strong Commodity Prices (NYSE:BTE)

Published

on

Baytex Energy: Organic Growth With Strong Commodity Prices (NYSE:BTE)

This article was written by

Long Player believes oil and gas is a boom-bust, cyclical industry. It takes patience, and it certainly helps to have experience. He has been focusing on this industry for years. He is a retired CPA, and holds an MBA and MA.
He leads the investing group Oil & Gas Value Research. He looks for under-followed oil companies and out-of-favor midstream companies that offer compelling opportunities. The group includes an active chat room in which Oil & Gas investors discuss recent information and share ideas. Learn more.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of BTE either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Disclaimer: I am not an investment advisor and this is not a recommendation to buy or sell a security. Investors are recommended to read all of the company’s filings and press releases as well as do their own research to determine if the company fits their own investment objectives and risk portfolios.

Advertisement

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Continue Reading

Business

First Solar: Strong Growth But A Hold For Now (NASDAQ:FSLR)

Published

on

First Solar: Strong Growth But A Hold For Now (NASDAQ:FSLR)

This article was written by

I’m a passionate investor from the Netherlands with 12 years of stock market experience. My articles usually contain a good overview of important investment criteria. A stock for my portfolio is of interest to me if the company has the following characteristics:1. Companies that are growing in both revenue, earnings and free cash flow.2. Companies that have excellent growth prospects.3. Stocks with favorable valuations.I prefer steadily growing companies with high free cash flow margins, dividend stocks and stocks with generous share repurchase programs.Disclaimer: My articles do not provide financial advice, they reflect my own findings and insights.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Aston Martin creditors threaten legal action over plan to sell branding rights, FT reports

Published

on


Aston Martin creditors threaten legal action over plan to sell branding rights, FT reports

Continue Reading

Business

ENAV S.p.A. (EENNF) Q2 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

Published

on

OneWater Marine Inc. (ONEW) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript