Copyright ©2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

DALLAS — Two nations that have never won a World Cup knockout match meet Friday at Dallas Stadium with a place in the round of 16 on the line, and the contest that should be one of the round of 32’s most evenly matched fixtures has been further complicated by significant injury concerns surrounding Egypt’s captain and all-time greatest player.

Mohamed Salah, the 34-year-old who lit up Egypt’s group stage campaign with his creativity and goal threat, is a major doubt for Friday’s match after suffering a hamstring strain in the final minutes of Egypt’s 1-1 draw with Iran. Salah was withdrawn in the second half of that match and did not train with the rest of the Egyptian squad on Monday, focusing instead on rehabilitation work as he attempts to recover sufficiently to take some part against the Socceroos. His status remains uncertain heading into kickoff at 2 p.m. ET.

The potential absence of Salah would be a significant blow to an Egyptian side that has leaned heavily on his creative output throughout the tournament. Salah generated 11 chances for teammates during the group stage, a figure that placed him second among all players in the tournament during that phase, behind only Belgium’s Leandro Trossard, who created 13. Without him, Egypt lacks a comparable creative presence capable of consistently unlocking organized defensive structures, and Australia’s compact shape has proven very difficult to break down throughout the tournament.

The injury concerns extend beyond Salah. Left-back Ahmed Fatouh has been ruled out with a hamstring tear of his own, while central defender Mohamed Abdelmonem is also listed as a doubt due to an ankle injury. The combination of those two absences could leave Egypt vulnerable across the defensive backline even as they attempt to manage without their captain and primary attacking threat.

Australia, meanwhile, arrives in Dallas without full-back Jacob Italiano and experienced midfielder Mathew Leckie, both of whom suffered tournament-ending injuries during the group stage. Despite losing both players, coach Tony Popovic is expected to continue with Aziz Behich at left-back and Jordan Bos on the opposite side of the defensive line, maintaining the structure that has given Australia its characteristic compactness throughout the competition.

Australia’s group stage results tell a story of a team that has not yet fully found its attacking rhythm. The Socceroos opened with a 2-0 win over Türkiye, following up with a 2-0 loss to the United States and a goalless draw against Paraguay. Of all sides that finished in the top two of their group at this year’s competition, only Croatia’s 24 shots were fewer than Australia’s 26, and no qualifying side generated a lower overall expected goals figure at 2.1. In their final two group matches, Australia managed only 17 combined shots with a total expected goals value of 0.9, a figure suggesting the team will need to create opportunities more efficiently in single-elimination play if they are to progress.

Australian striker Tete Yengi acknowledged the challenge of scoring against organized opponents while expressing confidence that the knockout format would unlock his team’s offensive output.

“There haven’t been easy games. We’ve been against good opposition, good defensive organisation, so it’s difficult to score,” Yengi said. “But we’re through now to the knockout stages, so we have to score now to win, so we’ll do that I think.”

Despite Egypt entering as narrow favorites according to Opta’s supercomputer modeling, which ran 25,000 pre-match simulations and produced Egypt winning 39.7% of them against Australia’s 28.4% and a draw occurring 31.9% of the time, the fixture is statistically the closest matchup of the entire round of 32. Egypt’s overall probability of advancing across all possible outcomes including extra time and penalties stands at 55.8%, compared with Australia’s 44.2%, making this genuinely the most open single-elimination contest of the knockout phase.

The defensive quality Australia brings to the match is genuine and measurable. Opta’s data shows that the average expected goals value of shots the Socceroos allowed in the group stage was just 0.052 per attempt, the second-lowest figure at the tournament behind Spain. Australia’s defensive organization has been the consistent thread through the competition even as the attack has sputtered, and their record against African opposition at World Cups is entirely positive: a 1-1 draw with Ghana in 2010 and a 1-0 win over Tunisia in 2022.

The goalkeeper story running through Australia’s campaign adds another dimension. Popovic’s surprise decision to bench veteran starter Matthew Ryan, the team’s long-serving captain, in favor of the inexperienced Patrick Beach has been one of the tournament’s more unexpected individual subplots. Beach, who plays domestically for Melbourne City and arrived at the tournament with just five international caps, has responded with two clean sheet performances and has been sharp in the moments that required him to make saves under pressure. His performance Friday could be decisive in a match where both teams are likely to be cautious in how they approach the first half.

Egypt’s group stage run was genuinely historic for the country. Their three-game unbeaten sequence, built on a 3-1 victory over New Zealand in which Salah scored, a hard-fought goalless draw with New Zealand’s opponents and the 1-1 result against Iran, represented the longest unbeaten run Egypt has ever had at a World Cup, and they scored as many goals across those three games as they had in their seven previous appearances at the tournament combined.

For the winner, a round of 16 matchup against Argentina awaits in Atlanta on July 7. That prospect of facing Lionel Messi and the reigning champions has been acknowledged in both camps’ public comments without requiring any particular elaboration. Both Australia and Egypt would represent significant obstacles to Argentina’s title defense regardless of how the bracket reads on paper, but getting there requires winning Friday’s match first.

The two nations have met just twice in senior competition previously, with Australia winning a 1987 tournament encounter on penalties and Egypt winning a 2010 friendly 3-0. Five members of the current Australian squad were also part of the team eliminated from the Tokyo Olympics by Egypt 2-0. That history is modest enough to offer little guidance for what happens when the referee blows the opening whistle in Dallas.

This article was written by

Follow

CUPERTINO, Calif. — Apple is preparing a significant hardware refresh for the first half of 2027, with four new iPad Pro models and a redesigned entry-level MacBook Pro both targeting a spring release window, according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, whose report also revealed an unusual and aggressive chip strategy that would see Apple skip high-end M6 variants entirely in favor of fast-tracking a new M7 processor generation built specifically around on-device artificial intelligence performance.

The disclosures add concrete shape to a 2027 product pipeline that was previously understood only in rough outline, confirming that Apple’s Pro tablet line and its most popular professional laptop will both receive meaningful updates within the same release window, even as ongoing memory shortages continue to complicate the company’s manufacturing costs and pricing strategy.

On the iPad side, Apple is testing four new iPad Pro models ahead of a planned spring 2027 launch, maintaining the existing 11-inch and 13-inch display sizes and offering both Wi-Fi and cellular connectivity variants within each size. No external design changes are expected, with the update focused squarely on internal improvements. Gurman reported that Apple has been experimenting with vapor chamber cooling for the iPad Pro, a thermal management technology that could help the tablet sustain higher performance levels during extended demanding workloads without throttling, similar to what Apple already incorporated into the iPhone 17 Pro. The current iPad Pro lineup uses the M5 chip introduced in October 2025, making the spring 2027 models the first update to the professional tablet in approximately 18 months.

The chip powering those new iPad Pros remains technically unconfirmed in Gurman’s report, which indicated the tablets could receive either an M6 or M7 processor depending on which silicon is ready in time. That ambiguity reflects the unusual timing of Apple’s chip roadmap as it currently stands.

Apple plans to introduce the M6 chip later this year in an updated 14-inch MacBook Pro, a transitional model internally codenamed J804 that carries the current MacBook Pro chassis with a chip upgrade but no design changes. That model represents the straightforward generational refresh Apple’s product line would normally deliver. What is unusual is what comes next.

Apple is reportedly skipping the M6 Pro and M6 Max chip variants entirely, bypassing the high-end variants of the M6 generation that would normally follow the base M6 by six to twelve months. Instead, the company is channeling engineering resources directly toward the M7, targeting a base M7 chip debut in the first half of 2027, a compressed timeline that would give the M6 an unusually short window as the company’s leading silicon before being succeeded by the next generation.

The rationale cited across reporting is AI performance. The M7 is being built on Apple’s 2-nanometer manufacturing process with specific optimizations for on-device AI workloads and is targeting memory bandwidth of approximately 240 gigabytes per second, significantly ahead of the M6’s comparable figure, giving it the throughput needed to run increasingly capable machine learning models locally without depending on cloud servers. Both the M6 and the M7 use 2-nanometer process technology, meaning the generational distinction lies not in the manufacturing node but in the AI-specific architecture choices Apple has made within the M7 design.

The redesigned entry-level MacBook Pro, codenamed K104, is the more visually significant of the two announcements. This model will adopt a new external design that mirrors the visual language Apple is preparing for its flagship touchscreen MacBook Pro models, expected to arrive in late 2026 or early 2027. The most notable section of Bloomberg’s report is that the lower-end MacBook Pro will adopt a new design language, first seen in the OLED touchscreen MacBook Pro expected before the end of 2026 or early 2027. The K104 will not include a touchscreen itself, differentiating it from the premium models while still sharing the slimmer bezels, revised port layout and punch-hole camera replacing the current notch that define the new design language. The M7 chip will power this redesigned entry model, potentially making it the first Mac to ship with next-generation silicon if the M7 timeline holds as reported.

M7 Pro and M7 Max variants are expected later in 2027, with an M7 Ultra not anticipated until 2028, meaning buyers who require the highest levels of computational performance for video production, scientific computing or advanced machine learning development will face an extended wait between the base M7’s spring 2027 debut and the arrival of its more powerful derivatives.

The spring 2027 window is shaping up as one of Apple’s most product-dense launch periods in years. Beyond the iPad Pro and MacBook Pro updates, reporting suggests the same window is expected to include the iPhone 18, iPhone 18e and a second-generation iPhone Air, creating a simultaneous release cluster across Apple’s most commercially important product categories.

A significant caveat accompanies all of this planning, however. The global memory shortage that has already forced Apple to raise prices substantially on its existing Mac lineup, with the entry MacBook Pro with one terabyte of storage jumping from $1,699 to $1,999 following a June price increase, continues to represent a genuine supply-side risk to any forward-looking product schedule. Apple’s scale gives it priority access to TSMC’s advanced manufacturing capacity and to memory suppliers in ways unavailable to smaller competitors, but no company is immune to yield problems, packaging bottlenecks or demand-driven allocation challenges when the entire semiconductor industry is simultaneously competing for the same components. Gurman’s report explicitly flagged that ongoing memory and chip shortages could still disrupt the 2027 launch timeline, a caveat that applies equally to the iPad Pro and MacBook Pro plans regardless of how confident Apple’s internal engineering teams are in their current roadmaps.

Apple did not respond to requests for comment on the reported product plans.