Connect with us

Business

How American Owners Took Over the Premier League

Published

on

Like almost all sports, football is no stranger to the symbiotic relationship of sports and advertisers.

When Malcolm Glazer completed his takeover of Manchester United in 2005, he became the first American ever to own a Premier League club.

Twenty years on, he looks less like an outlier than an opening act. Heading into the 2025-26 season, thirteen of the league’s twenty clubs carried at least some American money on their share registers, and around half were majority-controlled by US individuals, families or private equity groups. The world’s richest football league has quietly become one of the most coveted assets in American sport.

That surge of cross-Atlantic capital has reshaped far more than the boardroom. It has fed a vast commercial machine around every fixture — broadcasting, sponsorship and the tightly regulated betting market that now sits alongside the UK game, where supporters comparing licensed bookmakers can find out more through comparison sites such as Betiton. For business observers, though, the sharper question is why so much American money has landed on English football in the first place — and what Britain’s new football regulator intends to do about it.

The rise of American owners in the Premier League

The trajectory is stark. Before the Glazers, the English top flight had never had an American owner; today US investors are spread the length of the table. Stan Kroenke, whose sprawling empire also takes in NFL, NBA and NHL franchises, controls Arsenal. Fenway Sports Group, led by John Henry, owns Liverpool. Aston Villa’s V Sports vehicle is co-led by the American financier Wes Edens. And the pace has quickened sharply in recent years: Todd Boehly’s consortium bought Chelsea for £4.25bn in 2022, Bill Foley’s Black Knight group took full control of Bournemouth later that year, and Dan Friedkin — already the owner of Roma — completed a takeover of Everton in 2024, moving the club into a new riverside stadium for this season. Most of those thirteen American stakes have been built since 2008.

Why US investors keep buying English football

For a business audience, the logic is not hard to follow. America’s major leagues — the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL — are closed shops. There is no promotion or relegation, the number of teams is fixed, and incumbent owners rarely sell. Buying into the NFL, football-finance analysts point out, can cost somewhere between $5bn and $10bn, pricing out all but a handful of buyers. English football offers an alternative: global reach, an open pyramid and, crucially, valuations that still look modest by American standards.

Advertisement

Newcastle United is the clearest illustration. Ranked by Forbes among the most valuable clubs in the Premier League and inside the top twenty worldwide, the club was recently valued at less than the Columbus Blue Jackets — the lowest-valued franchise in the NHL — despite carrying several times the social-media following and playing in a stadium nearly three times the size. To American investors, that gap reads as opportunity: a globally recognised brand they believe has been run conservatively and, in the industry’s phrase, left unsweated. The Premier League’s international broadcasting income, still climbing, is the engine they are buying into.

Ticket prices, the Super League and the fan backlash

The influx has not been universally welcomed. American ownership has coincided with steep rises in ticket prices, and supporters’ groups have pushed back hard. The Arsenal Supporters’ Trust has characterised the trend as a model of squeezing ever more revenue out of fans, and organised protests have flared at Manchester United, Liverpool and Everton across the past two seasons. The deepest wound remains the 2021 European Super League, when six English clubs — several of them American-owned — tried to break away into a closed competition, only to retreat within days amid a furious backlash from supporters and government alike.

Beneath the anger lies a wider argument about where football’s money ends up. While billions flow through the top flight, the grassroots game continues to scrap for funding — a contrast that critics of the modern ownership model return to again and again.

What the new football regulator means for owners

The politics of all this have now hardened into law. The Football Governance Act 2025 received Royal Assent in July 2025 and created an Independent Football Regulator with statutory powers over the top five tiers of the English men’s game. For prospective owners — American or otherwise — the most consequential change is a new suitability test that scrutinises the source and sufficiency of their funds, alongside their honesty, integrity and competence. Every club will also need an operating licence to compete from the 2027-28 season, and will have to seek the regulator’s approval before relocating a stadium, altering its badge or primary colours, or borrowing against its ground.

Advertisement

The regulator, led by a former Financial Conduct Authority director, has signalled an interventionist stance and has already agreed to share information with the FCA. Its remit runs from club-level financial soundness to the heritage of the game itself — a direct response to years of collapses, mismanagement and the Super League affair. For US investors accustomed to lightly regulated, closed leagues at home, English football is about to become a more closely policed place to own a business.

What happens next

None of this looks likely to stem the flow of American money in the near term; the underlying maths that makes English clubs attractive has not changed. What is changing is the environment around the assets: tighter regulation, more assertive supporters and a commercial ecosystem — broadcasting, sponsorship and the regulated betting market tracked by comparison platforms such as Betiton — that keeps expanding in value. For the new wave of American owners, the challenge is no longer simply buying into the Premier League. It is proving they can run it in a way that fans, and now a regulator, will accept.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Hershey planning ‘action-packed’ second half of 2026

Published

on

Hershey planning ‘action-packed’ second half of 2026

Investment in new products and seasonal promotions expected to boost sales.

Continue Reading

Business

Ingersoll Rand Q2: Profitability Took A Hit, But There Are Ways It Can Come Back

Published

on

Ingersoll Rand Q2: Profitability Took A Hit, But There Are Ways It Can Come Back

Ingersoll Rand Q2: Profitability Took A Hit, But There Are Ways It Can Come Back

Continue Reading

Business

The furious dispute over what caused Air India flight 171 to crash

Published

on

BBC InDepth

In theory, the inquiry should be impartial and informative – a learning process focused solely on improving passenger safety. But in the case of AI171, the information revealed by the investigation so far has triggered a major backlash from safety campaigners, pilots’ groups and lawyers acting for the bereaved relatives.

A key factor in this has been the preliminary report issued by the AAIB a month after the accident. The 15-page document did not draw any conclusions about the causes of the crash, or make any recommendations.

Nonetheless, just two short paragraphs generated a great deal of controversy.

First, it was noted that according to the aircraft’s flight data recorder, the two fuel cutoff switches – normally used when starting the engines before a flight and shutting them down afterwards – transitioned from the run to the cutoff position seconds after take-off. This would have deprived the engines of fuel, causing them to lose thrust rapidly.

Advertisement

The report then says: “In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so.”

This brief statement, provided without a transcript or any indication of who was speaking, sparked intense speculation about the actions of the pilots. Newsweek, for example, focused on the “troubling possibility: that a seasoned captain may have deliberately doomed his jet – and nearly 250 lives”. Former NTSB chairman Robert Sumwalt told CBS News the report showed “this was not a problem with the airplane or the engines. Instead…somebody in the cockpit shut the fuel off to those engines.”

A few days later, The Wall Street Journal weighed in. Citing people familiar with the matter, it claimed that recordings of dialogue between the pilots suggested it was the Captain, Sumeet Sabharwal, who had flipped the fuel switches.

It is important to note that this was merely a preliminary report, and within days, the AAIB issued a statement condemning “selective and unverified reporting” in the international press as “irresponsible”. It urged the public and the media to “refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process.”

Advertisement

By then, arguably, the damage had already been done.

“When a pilot is alive he can defend himself” says Capt. CS Randhawa, president of the Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP). “When the pilot is dead, all the agencies can collude – and they put the blame on the pilot, to save the manufacturer. And this is seen the world over. It’s not the first time”.

His organisation, which represents around 6,000 pilots, condemned the preliminary report as “irrevocably compromised”. Together with Sumeet Sabharwal’s 91-year-old father, Pushkar Raj Sabharwal, they took their concerns to India’s Supreme Court, demanding a judicial investigation into the crash.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Ooredoo H1 2026 slides: margin expansion, strategic gains offset Q2 miss

Published

on

Ooredoo H1 2026 slides: margin expansion, strategic gains offset Q2 miss


Ooredoo H1 2026 slides: margin expansion, strategic gains offset Q2 miss

Continue Reading

Business

Hammer receives binding offer from Austral

Published

on

Hammer receives binding offer from Austral

Yes. Corporate subscriptions are available for teams and organisations, with discounted rates as user numbers increase. Pricing starts from $1,625 + GST per user.
Get in touch
to discuss the right option for your organisation.

Business News subscriptions are used by executives, investors, consultants and professionals who need to stay informed and make better decisions about the WA market. When you subscribe you’ll get

  • Unlimited access to WA’s most trusted business journalism
  • Data & Insights — detailed profiles of WA companies, people, projects and deals
  • MyBN — a personalised feed based on the companies, people and sectors you follow
  • Special publications and industry reports
  • Daily and weekly email newsletters

Data & Insights is a research tool built specifically for the WA market. It draws on more than 30 years of Business News reporting, updated regularly to reflect what’s happening now. Use it to:

  • Look up detailed profiles of WA companies, including financials, directors and ownership
  • Find decision-makers and track their career movements
  • Research live and completed projects across WA industries
  • Monitor deals, appointments and market activity
  • Access industry rankings and league tables

Data & Insights is updated daily by our dedicated research team, which uses the latest announcements, ASX filings and editorial coverage to keep our person, company, list and project records up to date.

Business News welcome all opportunities to make our dataset accurate, complete and current, so if you have an update request, please email the team at
general@businessnews.com.au, and we’d be happy to assist.

Advertisement

MyBN
is part of every subscription. It’s your personalised view of Business News. You can follow the companies, people, sectors and projects that matter to you, and get a news feed and alerts tailored to your interests. You can save articles to read later and retain only what you need.

Only subscribers have full access to all content on the Business News website.

Advertisement

If staying informed about the WA economy is part of your job, and/or you’re looking for networking opportunities in WA, Business News is built for you.

Business News subscribers are:

  • Executives and directors tracking competitors, clients and market movements
  • Investors and advisers researching companies, deals and industry trends
  • Consultants and professionals staying across sectors relevant to their clients
  • Business owners looking for leads, context and market intelligence

Most Business News publications cover national or global markets. Business News is focused entirely on Western Australia, which means the journalism, the data and the intelligence are all built around WA companies, people and projects — not adapted from a national feed. Data & Insights, included with every subscription, combines more than 30 years of WA-specific editorial research with live business data. There’s no comparable product for the WA market.

Advertisement

The Morning Digest Email provides a comprehensive wrap of the major headlines, relevant to WA business, and includes with a snapshot of the overnight news covering oil, gold and ASX-listed companies.

The Afternoon Wrap Email focuses on the news covered by our team of journalists during the course of the working day, including exclusive stories and analysis, all of which relates to WA business and the local economy.

The BN Weekender Email contains a wrap of the Business News from the week that was, highlighting the top stories in each area of WA business.
Sign up for free.

Advertisement

We’re happy to help.
Get in touch
and our team will come back to you.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

ZoomInfo: Cheap On Earnings, Expensive On Enterprise Value

Published

on

ZoomInfo: Cheap On Earnings, Expensive On Enterprise Value

ZoomInfo: Cheap On Earnings, Expensive On Enterprise Value

Continue Reading

Business

Jio Financial Services shares rise 2% after firm sets record date for dividend. What to expect?

Published

on

Jio Financial Services shares rise 2% after firm sets record date for dividend. What to expect?
Shares of Jio Financial Services rose over 2% on Monday after the company fixed August 10 as the record date for its final dividend of Rs 0.60 per share for the financial year, which ended on March 31, 2026.

Jio Financial Services shares rose to Rs 262.65 apiece on Monday, extending a more than 10% jump in a week. The company paid a dividend of Rs 0.5 per share to its shareholders last year. After announcing the latest dividend in April this year, the stock currently has a dividend yield of 0.19%, according to data on Trendlyne.

Fixing the record date as August 10 means that only shareholders who own the company’s shares in their demat accounts as of August 10 (next Monday) will be eligible to receive the dividend, subject to shareholder approval at the upcoming Annual General Meeting (AGM).

Earlier this month, Jio Financial Services reported 155% year-on-year (YoY) jump in its consolidated net profit at Rs 830 crore in the first quarter of FY27, while revenue from operations increased 227% YoY to Rs 2,004 crore during the quarter under review.

Advertisement

Consolidated total income rose 141% YoY to Rs 1,496 crore from Rs 619 crore. It was up 47% from Rs 1,020 crore in the March quarter. Interest income grew 165% YoY to Rs 962 crore, while fees and commission income surged to Rs 325 crore from Rs 54 crore.


Also read | Jio Financial Services sets record date for dividend. Check details

Jio Financial Services share price

Jio Financial Services shares had jumped nearly 4% to close at Rs 256 apiece on Friday. The stock gained more than 10.5% in a week and over 9% in a month. However, it is down nearly 12% in 2026 so far.
In the longer term, the shares of the company have fallen around 21% in a year. The company currently has a market capitalisation of more than Rs 1.73 lakh crore.Motilal Oswal has a Buy rating on Jio Financial Services with a target price of Rs 315 apiece. The brokerage said the company delivered a healthy quarter, driven by strong growth in Jio Credit, whose assets under management (AUM) crossed Rs 300 billion.

It also highlighted steady progress across the payments, insurance, and asset management businesses, although operating expenses remained elevated due to continued investments in incubating new businesses and expanding existing operations. Motilal Oswal cut its FY27 and FY28 EPS estimates by 4% and 6%, respectively, to account for higher operating costs, but expects consolidated PAT to grow at a 46% CAGR between FY26 and FY28.

Also read | For investors with some patience: 6 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with upside potential of up to 20%

Advertisement

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Continue Reading

Business

Morningstar: Undervalued With A Differentiated Business Model (NASDAQ:MORN)

Published

on

Morningstar: Undervalued With A Differentiated Business Model (NASDAQ:MORN)

This article was written by

I am a self-taught individual investor and I have been investing in stocks for over 25 years. I focus on dividend growth investing with a long-term horizon since I believe in the compounding power of dividend growth investing. I generally look for undervalued stocks with sustainable dividend growth and capital appreciation potential. I try to provide a little more in depth analysis weighing the positives and negatives. I am now in the Top 2.0% out of 28,000+ financial bloggers (February 2024) as tracked by Tip Ranks for my SA articles.Blog: www.dividendpower.orgWork/ associated with the existing authors James Marino and Ferdis.

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

10 Things to Know About Warren Buffett’s Famous S&P 500 Advice Amid Today’s Rising Concentration Risk

Published

on

Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway first bought into BYD in 2008

Warren Buffett’s decades-old advice to put money into low-cost S&P 500 index funds remains one of the most widely followed pieces of investment guidance in the world. But as the index has grown increasingly dominated by a small handful of technology giants, analysts say the strategy today carries different risks than when Buffett first popularized it. Here are 10 things to know about the guidance and how it applies to today’s market.

1. The advice traces back to Buffett’s 2013 shareholder letter. In that letter, Buffett instructed the trustee overseeing a bequest to his wife to allocate 90% of the funds to a low-cost S&P 500 index fund, with the remaining 10% directed toward short-term U.S. government bonds. He recommended Vanguard specifically, though he did not name a particular fund or ticker.

2. VOO is widely seen as the closest match to Buffett’s description. Vanguard’s S&P 500 ETF, trading under the ticker VOO, carries an annual expense ratio of just 0.03%, among the lowest available for a fund tracking the index, and aligns closely with the kind of low-fee vehicle Buffett described in his original guidance.

3. Technology now dominates the index far more than it once did. According to recent index weighting data, technology stocks make up roughly 37% of the S&P 500. Just three companies, Apple, Nvidia and Microsoft, together account for roughly 20% of the entire index’s value, meaning a large share of any S&P 500 index fund’s performance now hinges on the fortunes of a small handful of mega-cap technology firms.

Advertisement

4. That concentration has grown dramatically since Buffett first gave the advice. Ten years ago, the S&P 500’s 10 largest stocks represented just 15.3% of the index’s total market capitalization. Five years after Buffett’s 2013 letter, that figure had risen to 27.2%. Today, according to MacroMicro data, the top 10 stocks account for roughly 37.5% of the index, down slightly from an all-time high near 43% reached earlier this year, but still among the highest concentration levels in the index’s history.

5. Artificial intelligence spending is now a major driver of index-wide earnings. Goldman Sachs has forecast that companies tied to artificial intelligence could contribute roughly half of the S&P 500’s overall earnings growth in 2026. That dependence means a slowdown in AI-related capital spending or disappointing earnings from a handful of mega-cap technology companies could weigh disproportionately on the entire index, a risk that did not exist to the same degree when Buffett first offered his recommendation.

6. Long-term return expectations for U.S. stocks have moderated. Vanguard’s broad U.S. equity return model now projects 10-year annualized returns of between 4.2% and 6.2%, down from an earlier forecast range of 4.9% to 6.9%, reflecting the impact of higher current valuations on expected future returns. By comparison, the iShares Core S&P 500 ETF, trading under the ticker IVV, posted an annualized gain of 15.47% over the 10 years ending in June, a pace analysts generally view as unlikely to be sustained indefinitely.

7. Current valuations remain a point of debate among analysts. According to FactSet data, the S&P 500 currently trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 19.6, a level some analysts view as elevated relative to historical averages, though others argue current earnings growth, particularly among AI-linked companies, helps justify the higher multiple.

Advertisement

8. Money continues flowing into S&P 500 index funds at record levels. Vanguard’s VOO recently became the first exchange-traded fund in history to surpass $1 trillion in assets under management. According to data cited by Reuters, the fund has attracted roughly $69 billion in net inflows so far in 2026, following $118 billion in 2024 and $138 billion in 2025, with no other ETF attracting more investor money this year.

9. Experts generally still endorse the strategy despite the added concentration risk. Analysts writing for outlets including the Motley Fool and 24/7 Wall St. have said Buffett’s underlying advice remains sound in principle, since S&P 500 index funds continue to offer low costs and broad exposure to the U.S. economy. But those same analysts caution that investors should understand the fund no longer provides the same level of diversification it once did, given how heavily its performance now depends on a small group of dominant technology companies.

10. Buffett himself has continued monitoring risk within specific holdings tied to his broader philosophy. In more recent commentary, Buffett has reportedly cautioned about the risks tied to specific high-profile stocks, including SpaceX, following sharp declines in that company’s share price after its public listing, reflecting his continued attention to volatility and valuation risk even within widely held names.

Analysts broadly agree that Buffett’s core message, favoring low fees, broad diversification and long-term patience over active trading, remains valid advice for the average investor. But they emphasize that today’s S&P 500 looks meaningfully different from the one Buffett first pointed to in 2013, and that investors relying on the index for diversification should understand just how concentrated their exposure to a handful of technology giants has become, particularly if they are also invested in other tech-heavy benchmarks such as the Nasdaq Composite.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Boliden: Finding The Entry For 2026-2028

Published

on

Boliden: Finding The Entry For 2026-2028

Boliden: Finding The Entry For 2026-2028

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025