Skip To Content

Now all the headlines from President Trump’s United Nations speech are focused on his prior statements warning Iran that the Tehran regime has to either make a deal or face annihilation.

I believe annihilation refers to the regime. And he warned them not to focus on the midterm elections because he’s going to be president for another two and a half years. So, in effect, Mr. Trump discounted the midterm elections, and took them off the table. A bad day for Iran.

As Mr. Trump said: “They’re waiting to see how I do in the midterm election. What they don’t realize is that I’m not running. I did that already and won in a landslide. We won in a giant landslide, and I’ll be here for two and a half years.” He added that “I gave absolutely no credence and will not give credence to the election. When it comes to Iran. It doesn’t even enter my mind. The only thing that does is that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. The cowards and traitors —” here applause interrupted the president.

Please note carefully that big applause when he said Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. The UN is not usually, the member’s not usually applauding Mr. Trump, but they did actually on several occasions as we will discuss. Again, another bad day for Iran. 

The point is, even the UN hates Iran. So we’ll see about all of that and how it works out after the election. Before he got to the Iran warning, he talked about America having the hottest economy in the world. Creating a million new jobs, record-low poverty, and high real incomes in the 2025 Census, of course cutting taxes, getting rid of regulations, record stock market, by the way the Nasdaq tech rallied again to a new record high.

Then there was the issue of AI — which is now super intelligence now — is here to stay. And there will be no radical climate change type hoax or doomsday scenarios with our super intelligence. Nor will there be any global regulation of our super intelligence. By the way, no global regulation of anything. Including the International Criminal Court, UN agencies who won’t protect our children from transgenderism, or the persecution of Christians. Or promoting mass migration.

He emphatically said no to any global carbon tax, and in fact generalized “there will be no global taxes.” End quote. Full stop. Good for him. How about that? In front of the UN, Mr. Trump makes a no new tax pledge. Phenomenal. And the Nasdaq index hits another record high. 

Yet on all these points, Mr. Trump struck a positive, constructive, optimistic tone. This was a different kind of speech. This was a speech that had praise and applause that was unusual for his UN meetings. Yes, even the UN hates Iran and wants to stop them from having a nuclear weapon. For sure. 

Yet several times, Mr. Trump praised the UN, and its Security Council. For, say, helping on Iran, and for endorsing his 20 point Gaza peace plan, and approving the Board of Peace. And permitting the first lady, Melania Trump, to preside over a meeting of the Security Council, which has never been done before by a president’s wife.

Yet there’s more. Mr. Trump praised the leaders of Pakistan, Rwanda, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, for helping him in making peace deals.

To be sure, he mentioned the successful regime change and world oil implications of Venezuela. And he issued a very tough warning to Cuba — where Secretary of State Marco Rubio is working hard for some kind of regime change.

And of course, the new security arrangement in Greenland, which will protect the Western hemisphere and Europe from Chinese and Russian threats. But Mr. Trump had good things to say about NATO, which has come around toward his view on the need for 5 percent of GDP spending on defense.

We really haven’t heard him praise NATO much before. He talked about stopping the drug cartels throughout Latin and South America.

Yet importantly, he had very positive things to say about Mexican cooperation. Again, optimistic, positive, constructive. And then finally, well, no one seems to want to report on this toward the back end of the speech. I believe the president spoke movingly to all of the UN members about “the enemies of humanity.” 

He declared: “That is the challenge for every nation in this room. If we go forward strong and united against the enemies of all humanity, if we reject the voices who would have us give in to fear and doubt, if we refuse to shrink from our duties to our people, then together, through bold action, we will make this world far safer and a far better place.”

And he concluded again by reaching out to all those UN nations who really are not our best friends, but he exhorted them to “leave our nations far stronger.”

He said: “We will grow our economies far bigger, and we will not just speak of peace, prosperity, and justice. Here at the United Nations. We will stand for them all over the world. Together, we will build a future for our people that is brighter, more hopeful, and more magnificent than ever before. Thank you. God bless the nations of the world and God bless America”

This is why I’m calling this a historic speech.

This is an optimistic vision of freedom, peace, and prosperity, where this 47th President of the United States is asking all the nations to join him in this great crusade. Mr. Trump’s optimism was Reaganesque. I’d say this was pretty great stuff.

Qantas Airways plans to start selling seats on its first nonstop between New York and Sydney next August, with flights set to launch in 2028, as the Australian carrier fills out the details for another marathon route with a special Airbus plane.

The route will take about 18 hours, which puts it close to what is currently the world’s longest flight. The route that has that designation right now, nonstop service on Singapore Airlines from New York’s John F. Kennedy International Airport to Singapore, can top 19 hours.

But Qantas is set to take the crown next fall when it debuts nonstops between London Heathrow and Sydney that take about 20 hours. Flight times vary based on direction and time of year.

Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson told CNBC that the new flights come after strong demand for another ultra-long-haul route: its Perth, Australia, to London service, which is more than 17 hours and is flown on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

“What we have been able to learn from that is that there is absolutely a customer who wants this and is prepared to pay a premium for it,” she said in an interview in New York, adding that travelers are trying to avoid having to connect in other airports.

The Qantas Airbus A350-1000 ULR, which stands for ultra-long range, will be equipped with first class, business class, premium economy and standard economy cabins. Those aircraft have an extra fuel tank for the trip.

Singapore Airlines, meanwhile, operates its New York to Singapore flight with only business class and premium economy seats.

As part of its ultra-long-haul program, which it calls Project Sunrise, Qantas spent years working with sleep scientists to study jet lag. Hudson said the carrier has looked at ways to minimize the effects of traveling long distances by using things like different lighting schemes so customers can get used to the time zone at their destination.

Liverpool against Arsenal is no longer a Halloween Saturday fixture. The Anfield meeting has been moved to Sunday 1 November at 16:30 GMT, with Sky Sports broadcasting the game in the UK.

For anyone checking the market through vippari, the important question is not only which team is stronger. It is how much of each first-choice XI survives October at full intensity.

Arsenal are the defending Premier League champions. Liverpool, now coached by Andoni Iraola, opened their Champions League campaign with a 2–1 win over Atlético Madrid, while Arsenal won 1–0 at Napoli. By the time they meet, those results will be almost two months old.

October Gives Liverpool Almost No Empty Space

Liverpool host Manchester City on 11 October, then travel to LASK on 14 October for Champions League Matchday 2. Brentford away follows on 17 October, before Villarreal visit Anfield on 20 October.

Brighton then come to Anfield on 25 October, followed by Liverpool’s Carabao Cup fourth-round tie against Chelsea during the week beginning 26 October. Arsenal arrive on 1 November.

That sequence puts Premier League, Champions League and cup football into the same three-week block.

Iraola’s style also makes workload relevant. His Liverpool are built around aggressive pressing and repeated high-intensity actions, so midfield and wide-player minutes matter more than a simple league-table comparison.

Arsenal Have Their Own Travel Problem

Arsenal’s calendar is hardly cleaner.

They host Leeds on 10 October, then face Lille at the Emirates on 13 October. Nottingham Forest away follows on 18 October, before the hardest trip of the month: Bayern Munich away on 21 October.

Everton visit on 24 October, and Arsenal also have a Carabao Cup fourth-round tie at Fleetwood during the final week of the month. Three days after Liverpool, they travel to Slavia Praha in the Champions League on 4 November.

That gives both clubs two Champions League matches, three league fixtures and a domestic cup tie before they meet.

The Market Should Follow Minutes, Not September Form

The 1X2 can still begin with basic team quality, home advantage and Arsenal’s status as champions. The Asian handicap and player markets need more detail.

A full-strength Arsenal midfield after managed minutes against Everton is one version of the game. The same midfield after 90 minutes in Munich is another.

Liverpool face the same problem. City, LASK and Villarreal can all take heavy minutes out of the same core group before Arsenal arrive.

Before taking a position, the most useful checks are:

• 1X2 and handicap after the Champions League midweeks, not immediately after City or Bayern;
• totals and both teams to score once the likely midfield and defensive combinations are clearer;
• shots and scorer props only after the confirmed XI;
• live markets with the October workload in mind if one side starts strongly but fades after the hour.

A price posted early in October is still working with assumptions. By 1 November, those assumptions will have been tested several times.

Player Markets Should Be the Last Ones Priced

This is where the second half of October matters most.

A striker who starts against Villarreal, Brighton and Chelsea is not necessarily the same player-market proposition against Arsenal. The same applies to an Arsenal attacker used heavily against Bayern, Everton and in the cup.

Checking updated markets through vippari indir closer to the confirmed line-ups is therefore more useful than relying on an early scorer or shots price.

The first goal will also change the live picture quickly. A Liverpool side leading after a heavy October may protect territory rather than press for a second. Arsenal in the same situation may slow possession instead of opening the game.

The Calendar Comes Before the Table

Liverpool–Arsenal will still be treated as a major title fixture, but the league table alone will not explain the price.

The more useful evidence comes from the weeks immediately before it: who played 90 minutes in Munich, who started against Villarreal, who was rested in the Carabao Cup and which midfield still has enough legs to press at Anfield.

The match takes place on 1 November, but its betting market is built through October. By kick-off, the schedule may have told more about both teams than their opening Champions League results ever could.

JEFFERSON, wIS.— Kikkoman Foods, Inc., the US manufacturing arm of Kikkoman Corp., has opened its third US production facility in Jefferson.

The soy sauce manufacturer broke ground on the facility in 2024 and expects to begin shipping a range of Kikkoman products — including soy sauce, teriyaki sauce and non-soy sauce related seasonings — to retail, foodservice and food manufacturing customers this fall.

Kikkoman also has manufacturing facilities in Walworth, Wis., and Folsom, Calif.

“This facility gives us proximity to key agricultural suppliers, access to high-quality water our brewing process demands, and a workforce rooted in the same values that have guided Kikkoman for generations,” said Yuzaburo Mogi, director chairman of the board and honorary chief executive officer at Kikkoman Foods, Inc. “As global culinary influences continue to shape what people want on their tables, this facility also strengthens our ability to meet that evolving demand by bringing the depth and authenticity of international flavors to more people, faster.” 

It is a small problem that consumes a disproportionate amount of time, and it is one of the few genuinely solved problems in the current wave of AI tooling.

Why music licensing is confusing on purpose

The reason business owners find this hard is that the market is deliberately fragmented.

Royalty-free stock libraries charge either per track or by subscription, typically £10–£30 a month for the entry tier. The licence usually covers your own channels but excludes broadcast and paid advertising, which is exactly where most SMEs eventually want to use the video. Upgrading to a licence that covers paid media often costs several times the base rate.

Per-track marketplaces sell single tracks for £20–£60, which seems reasonable until you are producing video monthly and discover you have spent more than a year of subscription on six clips.

“Free” music from social platforms’ built-in libraries is genuinely free, and genuinely constrained — usable inside that platform only. Download the video and post it elsewhere and the licence does not travel with it. This catches people constantly.

Actually free music — Creative Commons and public domain — exists, is legal, and requires attribution formatting that most businesses get wrong, which converts a free track into a compliance liability.

The through-line is that the cheap options have restrictions you discover late, and the unrestricted options are priced for production companies rather than for a plumbing firm making a fortnightly explainer.

What generated music changed

The technology now produces instrumental backing tracks that are, for the purposes of a two-minute business video, indistinguishable from library music. Not chart music — nobody is releasing this — but the corporate-uplifting, acoustic-warm, minimal-tension register that business video actually uses.

Three practical advantages over library music:

It fits your runtime. Library tracks are fixed lengths and you cut to them or fade awkwardly. Generated tracks can be produced to length, which removes the most annoying part of the edit.

It is not on your competitor’s video. Popular library tracks appear thousands of times. If you have ever watched two firms in the same sector use the same swelling piano, you have seen the problem.

No takedown risk from automated matching. Platform content-ID systems flag library tracks with surprising frequency when licences are ambiguous, and disputing a claim on a video that is mid-campaign is a genuinely bad afternoon.

The pricing model is different, so budget differently

Here is where business owners get caught out. This is not billed like a subscription.

Generative audio is billed per generation, because each track costs the provider real computation. A track you generate and reject costs the same as one you use — and you will reject most of them. The realistic ratio is a handful of attempts before something fits.

So the number that matters is not the monthly headline price. It is: how many tracks do you need per year, multiplied by five or so for discards, multiplied by the per-generation rate. For a business producing one video a month, that total typically lands well below a mid-tier stock subscription — the current rates for the Flow Music API and comparable music models give a sense of the range, which varies more between providers than the output quality does.

For a firm producing video weekly, the gap widens considerably in generation’s favour. For a firm making two videos a year, a stock subscription cancelled after a month is still simpler.

The commercial rights question

This is the part to get right before you put anything behind paid media.

Terms differ meaningfully between providers. Some grant full commercial use on paid tiers including broadcast. Some restrict free-tier output to personal or internal use. Some retain rights to reuse what you generate. A few offer indemnification; most do not.

Before you standardise on anything, read the licence section specifically for: commercial use, paid advertising, broadcast, and whether the rights survive cancelling your account. That last one catches people — a track licensed under an active subscription may not remain licensed after you stop paying, which is a problem for evergreen content.

If your video is going on your website and social channels, most paid tiers are straightforward. If it is going on television or into a paid campaign, get the specific clause in writing.

What it does not replace

A composer writing to brief for a brand film is doing something this cannot do — responding to a creative argument, matching a brand’s existing sonic identity, iterating against feedback that is emotional rather than technical.

And music is not the reason a business video works. Clear script, decent audio on the voice, and a single idea per video matter enormously more than what plays underneath. A business that fixes its soundtrack problem and still films in a noisy office has optimised the wrong variable.

The practical answer

For most SMEs making regular video, the sensible setup is: generate backing tracks per project, keep the licence documentation, and stop paying a subscription for a library you use four times a year.

It is a small saving and a meaningful reduction in faff. Given how much of running a small business consists of small savings and reduced faff, that is not nothing.

Skip To Content