Connect with us

Business

Passenger on British Airways mayday flight describes fear and shout of ‘I don’t want to die’

Published

on

A Heathrow fire and rescue truck on a runway.

A passenger on a British Airways flight that issued a distress call on approach to Heathrow Airport earlier this month has described the rising fear in the cabin and a lack of information from the crew.

Edward Killiwick had been travelling back from a friend’s birthday party with his partner Julie, on the flight from Dusseldorf in Germany on 6 July.

He said passengers were told that the landing had been aborted, and then he felt a “very violent manoeuvre” and “did think we could crash”. He and his partner had to comfort a woman who “completely lost it and started screaming, ‘I don’t want to die’”.

The flight landed safely, but the incident is being investigated with assistance from BA.

Advertisement

The UK’s Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) said it was “investigating a serious incident”, and France’s accident investigation authority, the BEA, said on Wednesday that the plane, an Airbus A320, had issued a distress call.

Edward said: “The violent manoeuvre almost felt like it was avoiding another aircraft. You could feel the engines going at full power.

“It was a bit odd going around in a holding pattern with no information. I thought if they’re not talking, then they’re not in a good place.”

He said they were in a holding pattern for about 15 minutes.

Advertisement

The BEA said that as the plane approached Heathrow, there was a data system failure which triggered a stall warning.

The crew then flew the aircraft in a different mode called “alternate law”, which removes some automated flight protection systems. Another stall warning then occurred at 3,000 feet — which experts say was likely to have been just miles away from the airport.

The urgency call the crew had already made was upgraded to mayday, indicating imminent danger.

A British Airways spokesperson said the airline was assisting the AAIB with its investigation and was not legally able to comment further at this stage.

Advertisement

Edward said: “I was definitely scared. After the violent manoeuvre I thought, there is definitely something very badly wrong here. I did think we could crash.

“I did think it was a possibility, and I think everyone else did.”

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Apple faces Indian engineer’s bias lawsuit

Published

on

The Economic Times
Apple Inc. lost an early round in a discrimination lawsuit brought in the U.S. by a female engineer from India who says her two managers — one from her country, the other from Pakistan — treated her as they would in their own countries: as a subservient.

The woman’s case in California state court is the latest to allege workplace bias in Silicon Valley that focuses on cultural prejudices of some tech workers from South Asia. Cisco Systems Inc. is fighting a suit brought by California’s civil rights agency alleging bias against a member of India’s so-called lower castes, known as Dalits.

Anita Nariani Schulze is part of the Sindhi minority — she is Hindu, with ancestry in the Sindh region of what is now Pakistan. Her complaint alleges that her senior and direct managers, both male, consistently excluded her from meetings while inviting her male counterparts, criticized her, micromanaged her work, and deprived her of bonuses, despite positive performance evaluations and significant team contributions.

Schulze claims the managers’ animus reflects sexism, racism, religious bias and discrimination on the basis of national origin. The Sindhi Hindu nationality is “known for its technical acumen” and its gender equality, she says, which “exacerbated the managers’ discriminatory treatment.”

Advertisement

In a tentative ruling on Wednesday, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Sunil R. Kulkarni rejected Apple’s request to toss out the suit. While not ruling on the merits of the case, Kulkarni said Schulze had adequately supported her legal claims. Apple had argued her claims weren’t specific enough and were based on stereotypes.

But the judge rejected Schulze’s request to represent a class of female Apple employees who suffered job discrimination over the last four years. He agreed with Apple that she didn’t show a pattern of discrimination that could be applied to a broader group.