Connect with us

Business

Seven Sundays debuts oat-based pancake mix

Published

on

Seven Sundays debuts oat-based pancake mix
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Sustainability in baking in focus as business priorities shift

Published

on

Sustainability in baking in focus as business priorities shift














Advertisement
















Sustainability in baking in focus as business priorities shift | Food Business News

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement

Skip To Content

Continue Reading

Business

Thousands helped with back to school costs in Jersey

Published

on

Children sit in a primary school classroom with several pupils raising their hands while a teacher stands at the front near an interactive whiteboard. School displays and learning materials can be seen around the room.

More than £310,000 has been given to help families with back to school costs, the government has said.

Its Back to School Bonus was offered as a one-off payment of up to £150 towards uniforms,  stationery and other essentials for children from reception to Year 11 for families which earn less than £75,000.

The Social Security department said it had approved 2,552 payments for 1,450 primary school pupils and 1,102 secondary school pupils for the start of the upcoming term.

The bonuses come at the same time as a new school uniform policy, which limits States schools to five branded uniform items per child, to help parents save money.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

SanDisk Shares Climb 3.5% as AI Storage Rally Pushes Year-to-Date Gains Above 650% in Historic 2026 Surge

Published

on

SanDisk

Shares of Sandisk Corporation climbed 3.49%, or $54.82, to $1,623.69 as of 10:46 a.m. EDT Thursday, extending a historic rally that has made the flash memory maker the best-performing stock in the S&P 500 this year, even as the shares remain volatile day to day amid one of the most dramatic single-year runs in recent market history.

Sandisk’s stock has surged roughly 653% so far in 2026, according to FX Leaders, a run driven primarily by surging demand for NAND flash memory used in artificial intelligence data center infrastructure. The stock touched a 52-week high of $2,354.39 on June 22 before pulling back, and even after Thursday’s gains remains nearly 20% to a third below that peak, illustrating both the scale of the rally and the significant volatility that has accompanied it in recent weeks.

The company’s transformation from a traditional NAND flash supplier into what investors increasingly view as core AI infrastructure has been central to the stock’s re-rating. According to FX Leaders, the combination of a bullish Investor Day presentation, new U.S. restrictions on Chinese memory suppliers, and continued confidence in AI infrastructure spending has driven the shift in how the market values the company. Sandisk’s high-bandwidth flash technology has drawn particular attention from analysts; a five-star-rated Bernstein analyst described the technology as a “game changer for AI” in comments reported by TipRanks earlier this month, helping fuel a 3.5% jump in the stock at the time.

At its 2026 Investor Day, Sandisk outlined an ambitious long-term financial roadmap, projecting mid-to-high-teens annual revenue growth from fiscal 2028 through fiscal 2030, alongside a targeted non-GAAP gross margin of approximately 80% and a non-GAAP operating margin near 75%, according to Investing.com. The company also disclosed fiscal fourth-quarter 2026 revenue of $8.965 billion on Aug. 5, with full-year data center revenue surging 437% year over year. Earlier this month, Sandisk added $14 billion to its share repurchase authorization, bringing its total exercisable buyback limit to $15.5 billion, a significant capital return commitment that has further reinforced investor confidence in the company’s cash flow generation.

Advertisement

Wall Street analysts have responded to the company’s improving fundamentals with a wave of price target increases. According to FX Leaders, J.P. Morgan resumed coverage of Sandisk with an Overweight rating and a $2,250 price target, while Wedbush maintained an Outperform rating with a $2,000 target. Some 81% of analysts covering the stock now rate it a buy, according to the same report, marking the highest proportion of buy ratings the company has received since its spin-off from Western Digital. Separately, Investing.com reported that 20 analysts currently recommend buying the stock, against just one sell recommendation, with an average 12-month price target of $2,107.70, implying meaningful additional upside from current trading levels, though individual analyst targets vary widely, ranging as high as $3,600 and as low as $1,000.

Despite the bullish analyst consensus, some market observers have flagged the stock’s elevated valuation as a source of caution. FX Leaders noted that Sandisk, trading around $1,786.85 earlier in the week, carried a market capitalization of $280.5 billion on a price-to-earnings multiple of roughly 62 times, a valuation the report characterized as reflecting “excessively high expectations” alongside the market’s enthusiasm for the company’s structural shift toward AI infrastructure.

The stock’s day-to-day trading has remained highly volatile even amid its dramatic year-to-date gains. According to StockAnalysis, Sandisk and fellow memory chipmaker Micron Technology both fell sharply in premarket trading earlier this week, reversing a powerful rally from the prior session as investors trimmed exposure to what has become one of 2026’s hottest trading themes. CNBC’s Jim Cramer has pointed to a broader structural shift underpinning the volatility, arguing that the AI boom has transformed the historically cyclical memory chip industry, with surging demand and greater supply-side discipline among manufacturers supporting stronger and more durable profits than in past memory cycles.

Institutional investor interest in Sandisk has also drawn attention. According to StockAnalysis, Leopold Aschenbrenner’s investment fund, Situational Awareness, built stakes exceeding $5 billion combined in Sandisk and Micron before the fund encountered difficulties in July, an episode that nonetheless underscored the scale of institutional capital that has flowed into the memory chip trade this year. Separately, Morgan Stanley has offered a comparative analysis contrasting Sandisk with Nvidia, characterizing the two stocks’ respective ownership positioning within institutional portfolios as reflecting different stages of investor conviction in the broader AI trade.

Advertisement

Sandisk’s rise has been remarkably steady in its trajectory, if not always smooth session to session. The stock began 2026 trading around $235, following a strong 2025 in which the company’s shares had already returned 105% year-to-date by mid-February, according to earlier coverage from Barchart, driven at the time by expectations that Sandisk would double the price of its high-capacity 3D NAND memory devices amid surging AI-driven demand. By late February, the stock had climbed to $650, up 142% for the year at that point, according to TIKR’s analysis of the company’s blowout fiscal second-quarter results, which showed revenue of $3.03 billion, up 31% sequentially and 61% year over year, comfortably surpassing analyst estimates of $2.69 billion at the time.

As Sandisk approaches its next scheduled earnings report on Nov. 5, according to TradingView, investors are likely to continue closely watching whether the company’s aggressive long-term growth targets, robust data center demand, and expanded share buyback program can sustain the stock’s extraordinary valuation, particularly given the significant volatility that has periodically punctuated its rally throughout the year even as the broader upward trajectory has remained largely intact.

Continue Reading

Business

Gateshead pharma firm Shield Therapeutics ‘on track for full year profitability’

Published

on

Business Live

The company has issued half year results showing a 42% rise in revenues

Anders Lundstrom,  CEO at Shield Therapeutics.

Anders Lundstrom, CEO at Shield Therapeutics.(Image: Shield Therapeutics)

Pharmaceutical firm Shield Therapeutics has turned a multimillion-dollar loss into a small operating profit as more markets adopt its main iron deficiency product.

The Gateshead-based maker of iron deficiency-fighting tablets has operations in the North East and the US, and has been involved in partnerships to bring the products to customers elsewhere around the globe. The tablets are sold in Europe as Ferracru and all other territories as Accrufer, with a main focus on the US.

In its latest note to investors, covering results for the six months to June 30, the pharma firm said group revenues had risen by 42% to $30.4m, with Accrufer revenues rising by 5% to $20.1m.

It said its goal is to identify new opportunities to bring Ferracru/Accrufer to patients with iron deficiency across as many markets as possible, and that during the first half of its 2026 financial year, royalty and milestone revenues from global partners were $10.3m, up from $2.2m, comprising a $7.9m development milestone payment from ASK Pharma in China, $2.1m of royalty income from Norgine in Europe, and $0.3m in royalty from Kye in Canada.

Advertisement

The previous period’s operating loss of $5.8m was converted to profit of $209,000, and the overall loss off for the year of $9.5m was significantly narrowed to $2.3m, which it said was driven primarily by higher group revenues alongside the continuance of streamlining business expenditures. Directors said the group remains on track for full year operating profitability in 2026.

Anders Lundstrom, CEO of Shield Therapeutics, said: “We are pleased with our H1 2026 results showing growth in revenue and prescriptions over Q1 2026, despite the Medicaid changes in New York.

Shield Therapeutics' lead product Accrufer is used to treat iron deficiency in adults.

Shield Therapeutics’ lead product Accrufer is used to treat iron deficiency in adults.(Image: Shield Therapeutics)

“Since May, we have retained roughly 5% of NY Medicaid-approved prescriptions. The adaptability of our sales force is especially encouraging given how quickly we pivoted to commercially insured patients, our largest segment, at two-thirds of total revenue which grew 27% and drove strong overall prescription growth in H1 2026.

“Our earlier experience in Texas, where we successfully shifted from Medicaid to commercially insured patients, gives us continued confidence in applying the same strategy in New York and in sustaining ACCRUFeR’s growth.

Advertisement

“In the US, we are also excited about our first GPO contract, which opens access to over 400 additional clinics, and our newly launched paediatric indication. Globally, we continue to make good progress: pediatric extensions in Europe, strong growth in Canada and the UK, and 2027 targets launch in both China and Korea.

“The company is also excited to welcome Michael Jensen as our new chief financial officer, joining on 1 September 2026. His experience will strengthen our leadership team as we drive toward operating profitability in 2026.”

Continue Reading

Business

Dow Falls Nearly 350 Points as Walmart’s Weak Sales Growth Overshadows Earnings Beat Amid Rising Yields

Published

on

FTSE 100 Surges 0.8% Today as Oil Eases and Markets

NEW YORK — The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 349.23 points, or 0.65%, to 53,113.82 as of 10:02 a.m. EDT Thursday, as disappointing sales guidance from retail giant Walmart, a rebound in Treasury yields and rising oil prices tied to escalating tensions with Iran combined to pressure markets in early trading.

Walmart shares tumbled nearly 6% in premarket trading despite the retailer beating Wall Street’s second-quarter earnings estimates, as investors focused instead on comparable sales growth that fell short of expectations. According to data compiled by LSEG and cited by TheStreet, Walmart’s quarterly U.S. same-store sales rose 2.6%, well below the 3.8% increase analysts had projected. Average ticket, or spending per transaction, grew just 1.1%, a sharp deceleration from the 3.1% increase recorded a year earlier. CNBC reported a similar shortfall relative to FactSet’s consensus estimate of 3.5% comparable sales growth. Earnings per share guidance for both the fiscal third quarter and the full year also came in below expectations, according to CNBC’s coverage.

Brian Jacobsen, chief economic strategist at Annex Wealth Management, offered a pointed characterization of what Walmart’s soft guidance might signal about the broader health of American consumer spending. “For the consumer economy, this is like Nvidia posting a slowdown,” Jacobsen told Reuters. “Walmart has been winning the trade-down trade, but that tailwind may be fading.”

Thursday’s declines extended a choppy stretch for U.S. equities that has been dominated by a tug-of-war in the bond market over the past several sessions. Treasury yields advanced Thursday, reversing the decline seen a day earlier after the Treasury Department announced plans to at least double its repurchases of 10-year, 20-year and 30-year government debt over the coming months, a move aimed at easing pressure on longer-dated bonds following a spike in the 30-year Treasury yield to its highest level in nearly two decades earlier in the week. Wednesday’s rally, driven by that buyback announcement alongside a dramatic surge in Moderna shares following positive cancer vaccine trial results, had briefly snapped a three-day losing streak across the major indexes, with the Dow and S&P 500 each closing up roughly 0.2% that session.

Advertisement

Rising oil prices added further pressure to Thursday’s trading, fueled by escalating tensions between the United States and Iran following the expiration of a 60-day negotiating window earlier in the week. Continued attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and broader uncertainty over the conflict’s trajectory have kept crude prices elevated, a dynamic that has weighed on broader market sentiment throughout the week even as individual stock-specific catalysts have periodically driven sharp counter-moves in either direction.

SpaceX shares fell 1.61% to $137.40 ahead of Thursday’s opening bell as the aerospace and artificial intelligence company’s second major post-IPO insider share unlock took effect, with up to 319 million restricted shares becoming eligible for sale, according to TheStreet.

Alibaba’s U.S.-listed shares fell nearly 3% Thursday after the Chinese technology giant reported a 75% drop in profits for its June quarter, a decline the company attributed to a sharp jump in spending on artificial intelligence infrastructure, according to CNBC.

Not every sector faced pressure Thursday. Cryptocurrency-related stocks moved higher, extending a rally in Bitcoin and ether tied to President Donald Trump’s continued push for Congress to pass crypto-friendly legislation. Coinbase and Mara Holdings each rose 6%, Strategy jumped roughly 10%, Circle Internet gained 5%, and American Bitcoin climbed nearly 7%, according to CNBC’s tracking of premarket movers.

Advertisement

Looking ahead to the coming week, investors are turning their attention to Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh’s upcoming speech at the Jackson Hole economic symposium. According to commentary from market strategist Hathorn cited by TheStreet, that speech represents “the next major test” for markets, with investors looking for clues on “whether the hawkish discussion revealed in the minutes translates into his own policy message, and whether he offers greater detail on his broader plans for the Fed.” The Fed’s meeting minutes, released Wednesday afternoon, showed several Federal Open Market Committee members had favored raising interest rates at the central bank’s most recent policy meeting, with some officials suggesting further rate increases could become necessary if inflation fails to moderate, according to Yahoo Finance’s coverage of the minutes.

Thursday’s economic calendar also includes the Conference Board’s Leading Economic Indicators reading for July, alongside earnings from a broad slate of companies including Walmart, Chinese e-commerce giant Alibaba, agricultural equipment maker Deere, Chinese internet company NetEase and off-price retailer Ross Stores, according to Charles Schwab’s investor calendar.

The broader retail earnings picture heading into Thursday had shown some more encouraging signs a day earlier, with Target posting solid results and President Trump delaying planned tariffs against Canada, developments that had helped lift major indexes during Wednesday’s session even amid the ongoing bond market volatility, according to Schwab’s market commentary.

Full-year 2026 earnings growth estimates for the S&P 500 now exceed 30%, according to FXEmpire’s market analysis, with upward revisions broad-based across technology, commodity-related and economically sensitive sectors, and all sectors expected to post positive earnings growth for the year. That broader earnings optimism has provided a degree of underlying support for markets even as individual sessions, including Thursday’s, have shown significant volatility tied to specific company results and macroeconomic developments.

Advertisement

With Walmart’s disappointing guidance adding to a mixed picture painted by this week’s retail earnings season, alongside continued uncertainty in both the bond market and the geopolitical situation surrounding Iran, investors are likely to remain focused in the coming days on how the combination of consumer spending trends, Federal Reserve commentary and oil price volatility shapes market direction heading into next week’s Jackson Hole symposium, an event that has historically served as a significant venue for signaling shifts in U.S. monetary policy.

Continue Reading

Business

UK return no loophole, expert warns

Published

on

UK return no loophole, expert warns

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s reported return to Britain has prompted claims that the couple have picked the perfect moment to move for tax reasons, but a specialist has warned there is “no magic date in August” that allows anyone to come home without facing UK tax.

Harry and Meghan are expected to set up a private home outside London while keeping their properties in California and Portugal. Arriving partway through the tax year could offer some advantages, but Molly Monks, an insolvency specialist at Parker Walsh, said the move was far from a simple tax masterstroke.

“There is no magic date in August that allows someone to return to Britain without facing UK tax,” she said. “The rules consider how many days you spend here, where your homes and family are based and several other connections with the country.”

The UK tax year runs from 6 April to 5 April, and anyone who spends at least 183 days in the country during that period will normally be treated as UK-resident. If the couple arrived in late August and stayed continuously until 5 April, they would pass that threshold. UK residents are generally liable for tax on their worldwide income and gains, which could bring American earnings, investments, royalties and overseas property income into scope.

People who move to Britain partway through a year can sometimes qualify for split-year treatment, which divides the tax year into an overseas part and a UK part so that certain foreign income arising before the move stays outside the UK tax net. HMRC’s guidance on the statutory residence test sets out eight cases in which a year can be split, each with its own conditions, all of which must be met.

Advertisement

“Split-year treatment may be what has prompted some of the claims about perfect timing, but it is not automatic,” Monks said. “The couple’s precise movements, homes, working arrangements and future intentions would all need to be examined.

“Moving in August rather than at the beginning of the tax year could reduce the portion of the year treated as UK-resident, but that is very different from avoiding UK tax altogether.”

Based on the publicly known timeline, the couple are also unlikely to benefit from the four-year foreign income and gains regime, which replaced the remittance basis on 6 April 2025. The scheme can provide relief on eligible overseas income and gains, but HMRC guidance says a claimant must be within their first four years of UK residence following a period of at least ten years as a non-UK resident. Harry and Meghan left Britain around six years ago.

“The new regime sounds generous, but the ten-year absence requirement is crucial,” Monks said. “On the information currently available, it would be unsafe to assume that either of them qualifies.”

Advertisement

Meghan is an American citizen and would generally remain subject to US tax reporting on her worldwide income after moving. Tax treaties and foreign tax credits can help prevent the same income being taxed twice, but they do not remove the need for careful reporting in both countries.

Buying an English home while keeping overseas properties could also trigger a substantial stamp duty land tax bill. On a £10 million purchase, Parker Walsh calculates that the bill would be approximately £1.61 million if additional-property rates applied, rising to around £1.81 million if the surcharge for non-UK residents also applied. The final position would depend on the couple’s circumstances at completion.

Timing could matter again if they decided to sell their Montecito mansion, since disposing of an overseas property after becoming UK-resident could create UK capital gains tax considerations alongside any American liability.

Inheritance tax adds a further layer. Since April 2025, whether overseas assets fall within its scope has been based largely on long-term UK residence, broadly measured by residence in at least ten of the previous 20 tax years. Harry and Meghan may therefore have very different positions because of Harry’s long history of British residence. The switch to a residence-based test was part of the non-dom overhaul that preceded steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal’s decision to move his tax residency to Switzerland.

Advertisement

“Their return may have been perfectly timed for the school year or for family reasons, but calling it perfectly timed for tax is premature,” Monks said. “Maintaining homes and income across several countries can produce overlapping obligations rather than an easy loophole.”

She said anyone in a similar position would need specialist cross-border tax advice before selling an asset, buying a British home or changing where income is received. “With sums this large, getting the timing wrong could be extremely expensive,” she said.


Amy Ingham

Amy Ingham

Amy Ingham is a reporter at Business Matters, covering UK business news with a focus on breaking news, business policy, late payments and insolvency. She joined the magazine in 2026 after completing the NCTJ Diploma in Journalism at Harlow College’s journalism school. Her recent reporting includes British Steel’s nationalisation and its impact on SME suppliers, the decline in late payments by large firms, and Insolvency Service director disqualifications. Reach her at aingham@cbmeg.co.uk.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

What the Rise of VPN Gambling Means for Licensed UK Operators

Published

on

What the Rise of VPN Gambling Means for Licensed UK Operators

A £4.75 million UK Gambling Commission settlement in July offered the regulated gambling industry a useful warning about where responsibility can end up.

The case in question involved Evolution Malta Holding, whose games were found on six unlicensed websites accessible to consumers in Great Britain. The Commission concluded that weaknesses in the company’s risk assessment and controls had failed to prevent its products from appearing in parts of the illegal market. Its enforcement director specifically pointed to the need for operators to understand where their products are actually accessed.

That phrase becomes considerably harder to satisfy when VPNs enter the equation. Technology designed to conceal a user’s location is increasingly intersecting with a regulatory system built around knowing customers, markets and distribution routes.

For licensed UK operators, the resulting blind spot deserves much attention.

A VPN Problem That Does Not Stay With the Player

VPN gambling is often framed as a consumer issue. Players mask their IP address, reach an offshore site unavailable in Britain, and accept the risks that come with using an unlicensed operator. On the surface, the licensed sector appears to sit outside that transaction.

Advertisement

Licensed businesses don’t get that clean a separation.

In a 2025 freedom of information response, the Gambling Commission noted that operators need to know where their customers are located to ensure they act legally and in compliance. It has warned software providers to monitor business relationships so their games do not become available to British consumers through illegal operators.

VPNs can therefore create a gap between the location recorded by a system and the place where gambling actually occurs. The Evolution case didn’t hinge on VPN use itself, but it showed how quickly weak supply-chain visibility can become a compliance-by-gambling issue.

The Illegal Market Is Harder to Measure Than It Looks

Gambling Commission research published in 2025 found that 26% of surveyed consumers who admitted using unlicensed gambling sites used a VPN either all the time or specifically when visiting gambling websites. Because that activity can be obscured in conventional location-based traffic data, the regulator increased its estimates of illegal-market traffic by between 24% and 51%.

Advertisement

By April 2026, those assumptions were under review again. VPN use had jumped around the implementation of Online Safety Act measures in July 2025, and the Commission cautioned that web traffic is more useful for reading trends than pinning down the absolute size of the illegal market.

This sort of uncertainty has a business cost. If hidden traffic makes the black market look smaller than it is, estimates of customer leakage and competitive pressure can start from the wrong baseline.

Regulated Offers and Offshore Alternatives Can Sit One Search Apart

That regulatory divide can sit inside the same search session. For example, a customer comparing the best bingo bonuses on licensed sites remains in a market where UK rules govern promotions, identity checks and complaints processes. A few searches later, an offshore operator may be advertising a larger headline offer specifically because it sits outside GAMSTOP.

Search engines are an established route into the illegal market. The Commission’s consumer research records self-excluded gamblers describing searches for sites not registered with GAMSTOP, while enforcement teams have increasingly targeted search listings and the infrastructure supporting illegal websites.

Advertisement

Geo-blocking is where we’ve witnessed some of the stronger results.

Commission data covering 53 domains associated with GEO IP blocking showed an average 60% drop in engagement following the disruption. The regulator added an important caveat: the block remains effective only if consumers aren’t getting around it with a VPN.

Supply-Chain Monitoring Is Moving Closer to the Centre

Software suppliers have already seen how this can move from theory to enforcement. In April 2025, the Commission warned that games developed by licensed businesses had appeared on unlicensed websites accessible to British consumers. It told operators to actively monitor commercial relationships and terminate them when illegal GB activity is identified.

The July 2026 Evolution settlement gave that warning teeth. John Pierce, the Commission’s Director of Enforcement, said in the 23 July enforcement notice that operators need to understand “who they are supplying their games to, how and where those games are being accessed in practice”. Risk assessments that look credible in a board pack still have to survive contact with the live internet.

Advertisement

In practice, that pushes attention beyond contracts and onboarding files. Reseller arrangements may need testing after the relationship begins, especially where traffic patterns or market intelligence suggest a product has travelled to a destination it should not. The Commission is doing much the same on the regulatory side, using test purchasing, search engine referrals and financial intelligence to disrupt illegal gambling sites.

The Blind Spot Will Not Disappear

VPNs are legitimate privacy tools, and their use does not automatically indicate wrongdoing. A licensed operator also cannot control every attempt by a consumer to disguise a location or visit an offshore website.

Even so, the direction of travel is becoming clearer. Regulators are treating visibility as something businesses need to establish and test, rather than assume from a contract or an IP address. That is a tougher standard in an illegal market that can imitate the games and user journeys of regulated brands surprisingly well.

No, a compliance team doesn’t need perfect sight of every internet session. However, it does require sufficient evidence that, when an IP address ceases to be trustworthy, the remaining controls remain trustworthy.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Opinion: The ingredient always comes first

Published

on

Opinion: The ingredient always comes first

OPINION: Coming home after a period travelling and eating overseas has a way of sharpening how you see things.

Continue Reading

Business

Reform UK proposes tax rebates for firms to boost apprenticeships

Published

on

Suella Braverman is wearing a dark-coloured top and white dungarees. She is holding a paintbrush and painting white paint on to a blue wall. She is being observed by a woman in the background, who is wearing a black top.

Young apprentices should have part of their wages paid by taxpayers, according to Reform UK plans, external aimed at delivering a “skills revolution”.

The party’s education spokeswoman Suella Braverman said a Reform government would introduce an “apprenticeship wage credit” offering small and medium-sized businesses a 30% rebate on the wages of apprentices they take on aged 16 to 18.

She also advised students receiving their GCSE exam results on Thursday “not to get ripped off by the great university scam” and to learn a trade instead.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has said he wants teenagers to have technical routes into careers that could rival the path of a traditional university degree.

Advertisement

The government has been introducing changes and examining ways to encourage more young people into work, including giving some parents on benefits up to £4,500 a year to encourage their children to start apprenticeships.

Former minister Alan Milburn has been tasked with investigating why so many young people are not in employment, education or training – known by the acronym Neets.

Reform said its announcement was the first in a series of proposals aimed at reaching 600,000 apprenticeship starts per year by the end of the next Parliament, likely to be 2034.

The party says it would pay for its plans by banning all foreign students from accessing taxpayer-funded loans and stopping what the party calls “Mickey Mouse degrees”.

Advertisement

Reform said its policy, which also includes a £2,000 retention bonus for apprentices, could cost between £1.48bn and almost £2bn over five years.

Braverman said there are “excessive number of graduates with qualifications that don’t match the skills needed for our country,” arguing that learning a trade would be a better use of their time.

Apprentices are generally paid a lower wage but get on-the-job training and practical work experience.

Speaking at a press conference, Braverman said: “We’re firing the starting gun on unleashing a technical and vocational renaissance of homegrown skills.

Advertisement

“Reform will not do this because it fills us with some jingoistic pride but because we will do what it takes to save Britain from the perpetual doom loop of decline, debt and despair that we’re currently in.”

The MP said the apprenticeship wage credit would result in businesses saving an average of £4,000-a-year per apprentice.

The £2,000 tax-free retention bonus would be paid to workers who “show loyalty” by staying with the business that trained them for at least two years after they complete their apprenticeship, said Braverman.

Asked if the policy would mean some universities would have to close, Braverman said she did not envisage that but instead suggested universities need to “repurpose” themselves into construction colleges and manufacturing colleges.

Advertisement

When pressed to give examples of “Mickey Mouse degrees”, Braverman pointed to “gender studies” and “golf course studies”.

She said: “There’s not a necessity, there’s not a value in many of these degrees.”

The British and International Golf Greenkeepers Association (BIGGA) has previously criticised Braverman for similar remarks, which they branded “negligent and potentially damaging”.

BIGGA chief executive Jim Croxton said: “Golf course management is a growing industry with currently more vacancies than qualified applicants.

Advertisement

“Anyone successfully studying for a degree in this field is effectively guaranteed employment in a vibrant industry.”

On Wednesday, Conservative shadow education secretary Laura Trott said there is demand for apprenticeships but claimed the Labour government “aren’t doing enough to boost supply”.

She said: “Our New Deal for Young People would axe the dead end degrees that don’t lead to jobs and instead invest in apprenticeships giving school leavers more choice.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

How wealthy families can prepare for aging parents, avoid succession crisis

Published

on

How wealthy families can prepare for aging parents, avoid succession crisis

Westend61 | Westend61 | Getty Images

A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

Battles over aging parents and their fortunes are becoming increasingly common in wealthy families, with some requiring cognitive assessments for those leading family businesses.

Advertisement

While many families focus on the tax or financial components of wealth transfers, fewer are addressing the question of when an aging parent should give up control, wealth advisors and lawyers told CNBC. Waiting until a parent’s cognitive decline is apparent can leave families scrambling over who controls their fortune.

“Look, most of the matriarchs and patriarchs who create family wealth are strong personalities, right?” said trust and probate attorney Scott Rahn. “They’ve done great things, they’ve created this wealth, they’ve created dynasties. Now you’re coming face to face with the reality that despite all of their accomplishments, they’re human. That can just be emotionally difficult for families.”

Rahn said delaying a transition process can come at a steep cost. His law firm, RMO LLP, specializes in inheritance disputes among ultrawealthy families. He said these types of conflicts have become more common as families grow richer and people live longer, which comes with higher chances of a family member developing conditions like Alzheimer’s disease. 

Family businesses can build in legal safeguards, such as mandatory retirement ages or mental capacity evaluations, according to Rahn. But how families talk about succession can matter as much as the legal language, he said.

Advertisement

“Whatever that mandatory retirement clause may be, it has to be part of a fulsome discussion around family wealth — what it means culturally to the family,” he said.

Here are four tips to make it easier for parents to pass on the reins:

1. Talk about it earlier rather than later. 

The biggest mistake that families make is waiting for a crisis like a stroke or a disagreement to discuss succession, according to Mallory Findley of Rockefeller Capital Management. By then, emotions are running high and sometimes trust is already broken, she said.

“The better approach is to begin while everyone is capable of participating really thoughtfully — as we like to say — while they’re happy and healthy and here,” said Findley, the firm’s head of family dynamics and financial education.

Advertisement

She said meaningful life events, like selling the family business or a birth in the family, make for natural points to evaluate future plans. 

It’s easier to have these weighty conversations if the family talks regularly, said BJ Goergen Maloney, global head of J.P. Morgan Private Advisory. 

“If you don’t have a cadence of talking about things, even if it’s a couple of times a year, it’s really hard to have those conversations,” she said.

Families can build their muscle memory, as she puts it, with casual gatherings, Maloney added. 

Advertisement

“People like to think of a family meeting for a very wealthy family as very formal, but a family meeting can be dinner on Sunday night,” she said. “It doesn’t have to be complicated. It’s really about creating a place where you can talk about things and be transparent and solicit other people’s opinions.”

2. The transition should be gradual.

While families should seek a health evaluation sooner rather than later if they see signs of cognitive decline or dementia in a matriarch or patriarch, the succession process shouldn’t be rushed, advisors told CNBC.

Cognitive decline is usually a gradual process, and aging adults’ needs can change over time, noted Valerie Galinskaya, head of the Merrill Center for Family Wealth. Handing over family affairs should not resemble flipping a light switch, she said.

For instance, when a client expressed concerns that his mother, who managed multiple properties, was no longer as sharp as she used to be, Galinskaya said she framed the conversation as financial planning for the entire family. Rather than focusing on the mom’s faculties, the advisor asked how each family member viewed success across different time horizons. 

Advertisement

“We reframe it as not taking reins away but asking who is the right individual holding reins for individual decisions at hand,” she said. 

Adult children’s efforts to claim control can backfire if they act too quickly or second-guess their parents’ decisions, according to Dan Griffith, director of wealth strategy at Huntington Bank.

“One of the sad scenarios I’ve seen is that you’ve got overbearing kids who drive their parents away. When they do that, they’re driving their parents into the arms of somebody who potentially could take advantage of them,” he said.

Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

3. Treat the wealth creator with respect.

Tact is everything, according to Mark Parthemer, chief wealth strategist of Glenmede.

Advertisement

“This individual — for whatever role that we’re talking about getting them out of, whether it’s driving the car, running the company, or being the trustee of the trust — a lot of their self identity is invested in that role, right?” he said. “They’ve been the key person. They’ve been the person everyone relies on, and so we should be delicate about removing them from that role.”

There are ways to make a transition feel empowering, Parthemer said, noting one family he advised chose to “promote” the patriarch from president of the company to chairman of the board. 

“That was a real-life situation where we were trying to allow dad to remain in a position where he felt important, needed and valued,” he said. “Even though he couldn’t do the multi-step business dealings, he could have done before, he was still able to attend strategy meetings and weigh in.”

Sometimes it’s not possible for a parent to stay involved in the family business. Findley recommended that families in that situation discuss and acknowledge the other ways they contribute, which can make handing over financial control feel less like something is being taken away and more like a natural shift in responsibilities. 

Advertisement

“Our process is really to help families recognize that every family member brings value beyond financial contribution,” she said. “So for the senior generation, oftentimes that looks like wisdom, family history, emotional steadiness, mentorship, or even just the ability to keep people in the family really connected.”

4. Get the family on the same page.

When siblings are involved, it’s rare for all the adult children to be on the same page, according to Galinskaya. It’s common for one child to live closer to a parent and be aware of a parent’s declining health while their siblings may be disengaged or in denial, she said.

It’s important to have a consensus among the siblings before broaching these subjects with a parent, she said. While some advisors prefer in-person meetings in family homes, Galinskaya said she prefers a neutral space like an office. She also said virtual meetings can be surprisingly helpful.

“If there is a family member who takes up a lot of the airtime, Zoom is actually a good way,” she said. “Everyone is a rectangle.”

Advertisement

She recommends setting ground rules, such as not allowing spouses or partners to participate. To prepare, Galinskaya has clients fill out pre-meeting questionnaires, which are kept confidential, about their objectives and concerns. Often family members admit to feeling judged for how they spend their money or resentful of how finances are used as a means of control, she said.

As for meetings with the senior and next generations, the goal isn’t to get everyone to agree but to clear the air, said Rick Pitcairn, chief global strategist at Pitcairn.

“In my view, families, the succeeding generations of family members, they don’t always have to agree with the decisions, but if they understand why they were made, and the person says this is why I made this decision, they’re pretty accepting of those decisions,” he said. “If they don’t, then they start to accuse people of things that they probably didn’t do, and there’s mistrust and dysfunction.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.
Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025