This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have a beneficial long position in the shares of FLR either through stock ownership, options, or other derivatives. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

More than one-third of English-language web pages published since ChatGPT’s public debut in November 2022 show signs of having been written or substantially edited by artificial intelligence, according to a new analysis from the Pew Research Center, offering one of the most concrete measures yet of how quickly generative AI has reshaped online content.

To conduct the study, Pew researchers used the Common Crawl web archive to collect nearly half a million English-language web pages spanning roughly the past five years, beginning a couple of years before ChatGPT’s release. Researchers then ran the text of those pages through an AI detection tool called Open Pangram to assess how many were likely written or heavily edited by artificial intelligence, according to Pew’s own published findings.

In a random sample of 10,000 web pages collected in July 2026, approximately 10% showed what Pew described as “significant signs of AI authorship.” However, that headline figure includes a substantial share of older pages published well before AI writing tools existed and therefore could not possibly have been AI-generated. When researchers filtered out those older pages and focused exclusively on content published after ChatGPT’s release, the picture shifted dramatically: signs of AI authorship appeared in more than one-third, or 35%, of that more recent content, according to Pew’s report.

“In the July 2026 snapshot, signs of AI authorship can be found in over one-third of pages published after ChatGPT was released,” Pew wrote in its analysis, adding that the finding aligns with other research indicating that a large share of recently published internet content has likely been written or substantially edited using AI tools.

The distribution of AI-authored content across the web is far from uniform. According to Pew, commercial .com domains showed signs of AI authorship at roughly 10 times the rate found on .edu or .gov domains, both of which registered around 1%. Nonprofit .org domains fell in between, with an AI-authorship rate of about 4.6%, according to Pew’s data. That gap has widened considerably since ChatGPT’s initial release; Pew noted that when the chatbot first launched, the kinds of linguistic patterns that can signal AI authorship appeared at broadly similar rates across the major top-level domains, meaning the current divergence reflects a meaningful shift in how different types of websites have adopted AI writing tools over the past several years.

TechCrunch, which reviewed Pew’s findings, cautioned that AI-detection tools such as Pangram are not infallible and can occasionally misclassify genuinely human-written pages as AI-generated. Even so, the outlet noted that “at scale, the data is likely at least directionally correct,” suggesting the overall trend captured by the study reflects a genuine and substantial shift in online authorship patterns rather than a statistical artifact.

Beyond the headline percentage, Pew’s research identified specific stylistic markers that have become increasingly common across web content and are frequently associated with AI-generated writing. According to the study, the use of em dashes, Oxford commas and certain characteristic phrasing patterns, including constructions such as “it’s not X, it’s Y,” have all become noticeably more frequent in recently published web content, further supporting the broader finding that AI tools are playing an increasingly significant role in how online text gets produced.

Digital Trends, in its coverage of the study, emphasized an important nuance in how the findings should be interpreted. The outlet noted that Pew’s research does not claim one-third of web pages were written entirely by AI with no human involvement, but rather that the pages showed indicators suggesting AI played some role in the content’s production. Modern online writing increasingly blends human and machine contributions in varying proportions, the outlet explained, with writers frequently using AI tools to generate initial drafts, rewrite specific sections, correct grammar, expand shorter pieces into longer articles, or produce search-optimized versions of existing content, meaning a single published page can reflect a complex mixture of human and AI authorship rather than falling cleanly into one category or the other.

The findings have already drawn attention from the digital advertising industry, given the significant overlap between AI-generated content and the broader ecosystem of low-quality, high-volume web content sometimes referred to as “Made-for-Advertising,” or MFA, sites. According to B&T’s coverage of the study, industry observers are urging advertisers and publishers to shift their focus away from simply determining whether a given piece of content was created by AI, and toward evaluating whether that content delivers genuine value to readers regardless of how it was produced. The publication noted that generative AI has dramatically reduced both the cost and time required to produce large volumes of low-value content at scale, a dynamic that has significant implications for how digital advertising inventory gets evaluated and purchased going forward.

Separate research cited alongside Pew’s findings has reached broadly similar conclusions using different methodologies. According to Shelly Palmer’s coverage of related Stanford research, researchers there found that 35% of new websites created since 2022 were AI-generated or AI-assisted, drawing on Internet Archive data to track how the composition of the web has shifted in the years following ChatGPT’s launch, a finding that closely mirrors Pew’s own 35% figure for post-ChatGPT content despite the two studies relying on different underlying data sources and detection methods.

Digital Trends pointed to a notable irony embedded within the broader trend the research documents. AI companies require enormous volumes of human-created text to train their language models, the outlet observed, even as those same AI systems are now responsible for producing an increasing share of the content that eventually gets published online, raising longer-term questions about a web increasingly characterized by humans writing content intended for machines to read, machines producing content intended for human readers, and, potentially, future AI models eventually training on content that earlier AI systems helped generate.

As generative AI tools continue to become more sophisticated and more deeply embedded in everyday content production workflows, researchers, publishers and advertisers alike are likely to continue closely tracking how the balance between human and AI-assisted authorship on the web evolves in the years ahead, particularly given how dramatically the share of AI-influenced content has grown in just the roughly three and a half years since ChatGPT’s initial public release in November 2022.

By Ewa Manthey, Commodities Strategist

Fiscal risks give gold fresh momentum

Gold has climbed from around $4,000/oz in mid-July to around $4,600/oz, returning to levels last seen in May.

The latest move followed the US

Some CenturyLink customers reported ongoing internet and phone connectivity problems in recent days, though independent outage-tracking services have largely characterized the telecommunications provider’s network as operating normally, illustrating the kind of mixed signals that often accompany scattered or regional service disruptions.

CenturyLink, which offers internet, television, phone and home security services across 37 states, provides its television offering either through satellite partner DirecTV or through its own internet-based Prism TV platform. The company has grown substantially through a series of major acquisitions over the years, absorbing Embarq in 2009, Qwest in 2010, Savvis in 2012 and Level 3 Communications in 2017, expanding its network footprint into one of the larger telecommunications infrastructure providers in the United States. The company now operates under the corporate name Lumen Technologies, though it continues offering residential and business services under the CenturyLink brand in many markets.

According to reporting from Sunday Guardian Live, CenturyLink customers across the U.S. have continued reporting internet and connectivity problems in recent days, with users flagging outages, slow connections and general difficulty getting online. The outlet noted that current outage-monitoring services have shown a mixed picture of the situation: StatusGator listed CenturyLink as operational overall, even while recording dozens of individual user-submitted outage reports over a 24-hour period. As of that reporting, there was no confirmed evidence of a broad, nationwide CenturyLink outage, even as scattered individual complaints continued to surface.

Other independent monitoring tools have offered similarly reassuring assessments of CenturyLink’s overall network status. According to Outage.report, CenturyLink appeared to be functioning normally as of its most recent check, with reported complaint volume falling within the typical range expected for that time of day. The service noted that its most recently recorded incident affecting CenturyLink had occurred more than a year earlier, with no additional incidents logged over the trailing 12-month period based on available monitoring data. Similarly, IsDown reported receiving zero user-submitted issue reports for CenturyLink over a recent 24-hour monitoring window, while ISPDown.com’s tracking likewise showed zero reported outages during a separate 24-hour check earlier this month.

Entireweb’s status tracker offered a slightly more granular picture, noting that CenturyLink had received three user reports over a 24-hour period during a recent check, though none of those reports had come in during the final hour before the assessment was conducted, suggesting any reported issues at that time were relatively limited in scope and had not escalated further.

Despite that broadly reassuring pattern across most monitoring services, individual customer complaints posted to public forums paint a more frustrated picture of periodic, localized service problems. According to comments compiled by UpDownRadar, customers in various states have described extended outages, difficulty reaching customer support, and recurring connectivity issues requiring frequent equipment resets. One user described enduring what they characterized as more downtime than uptime, while another reported an outage that persisted for multiple days without a clear explanation from the company regarding its cause. Such individual, longer-running complaints are common on outage-tracking forums and often reflect localized infrastructure issues affecting specific neighborhoods or service areas rather than problems with CenturyLink’s broader network.

StatusGator’s more detailed incident history for CenturyLink shows a pattern of periodic, relatively short-duration outages scattered throughout the year. According to the service’s records, CenturyLink experienced an internet service outage lasting approximately six hours and 27 minutes in early July, a separate 58-minute service outage in June, a 13-minute internet connectivity disruption later that same month, and a roughly one-hour outage in May. None of those incidents, according to StatusGator, were ever officially acknowledged by CenturyLink through a public statement, a pattern consistent with how many internet service providers handle smaller, regional outages that do not rise to the level of a company-wide announcement.

CenturyLink’s network carries particular significance beyond individual residential and business customers, given the company’s role in supporting critical telecommunications infrastructure across multiple states. According to TechCrunch, CenturyLink experienced a major outage in the past that disrupted 911 emergency call services across several states after a significant disruption at one of the company’s data centers. That outage began shortly after noon Eastern time on a Thursday and caused significant disruption to 911 call centers that extended into the following day, with the company confirming that all consumer services affected by the incident, including both voice and 911 services, had been fully restored by that Friday evening, more than a day after the disruption first began. CenturyLink at the time did not disclose the specific underlying cause of the outage beyond describing it broadly as an issue involving a “network element.” TechCrunch noted that CenturyLink serves as one of the largest telecommunications providers in the country, supplying internet and phone backbone infrastructure to major cellular carriers, including AT&T and Verizon, underscoring how disruptions to CenturyLink’s core network can potentially ripple outward to affect customers of other carriers relying on its underlying infrastructure.

Regulatory records have also documented individual customer complaints regarding CenturyLink service disruptions over time. According to a complaint report filed with Utah’s Division of Public Utilities, one customer reported an extended phone service outage in December 2025 that the company initially attributed to a wet line issue before the service went out again shortly afterward, reportedly due to a fire; the customer’s complaint was not formally resolved until January 2026, illustrating how individual service disruptions can sometimes take considerable time to fully resolve even after being reported to regulatory authorities.

Given the discrepancy between scattered individual complaints and the largely operational readings recorded by most independent monitoring services, any recent reports of CenturyLink problems most likely reflect localized or intermittent issues rather than a broad, company-wide outage. Customers experiencing persistent difficulty with CenturyLink internet, phone or TV service are generally advised to first attempt basic troubleshooting steps, including power-cycling their modem or router, before assuming a wider service-area disruption is underway, and can additionally use CenturyLink’s own official outage troubleshooting tool to check whether a known issue has been identified affecting their specific location. As of this report, CenturyLink had not issued a public statement addressing any specific, ongoing service disruption beyond the routine, generally unacknowledged pattern of shorter regional outages that outage-tracking services have continued to document throughout the year.