Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

Strait of Hormuz Remains Heavily Restricted Amid Iran War as Traffic Drops to 5% of Normal

Published

on

Strait of Hormuz Traffic Near Standstill Despite US-Iran Ceasefire: Only

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates — The Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway linking the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea and critical for global energy supplies, stays under severe restriction more than two months after the outbreak of the U.S.-Israel war with Iran. Shipping traffic has plummeted to roughly 5% of pre-war levels, with only a handful of vessels transiting daily amid competing blockades, sporadic attacks and stalled ceasefire negotiations.

As of May 12, 2026, the strait is not fully closed to all shipping but functions under tight Iranian control and a U.S. naval blockade. Iran has redefined the area as a vastly expanded operational zone, stretching from Jask in the east to Siri Island in the west — roughly 10 times wider than before the conflict. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) enforces selective passage, charging tolls and requiring detailed vessel information for approved transits.

Pre-war, the strait carried about 20-25% of global seaborne oil trade and 20% of liquefied natural gas (LNG), with roughly 138 vessels passing daily. Current data shows just 17 ships in the last 24 hours, moving only about 515,000 deadweight tons — a fraction of the normal 10.3 million. Dozens of vessels loiter outside the area, waiting for safer conditions, while more than 1,500 ships remain stranded inside the Persian Gulf.

Origins of the Crisis

Tensions exploded on Feb. 28, 2026, following U.S. and Israeli airstrikes on Iran that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Iran responded by restricting access to the strait, declaring vessels linked to the U.S., Israel and their allies as potential targets. On March 27, the IRGC formally announced a closure to adversarial shipping. The U.S. imposed its own blockade on April 13, targeting vessels entering or exiting Iranian ports.

Advertisement

Since then, at least 42 maritime incidents have been reported, including attacks on tankers, drone strikes and seizures. The U.S. has disabled multiple Iranian-flagged vessels, while Iran has conducted strikes on UAE targets and other shipping. A brief U.S. escort operation to guide ships through the strait was paused at Iran’s request to facilitate talks, but progress remains elusive.

Diplomatic Stalemate and Ceasefire Hopes

Ceasefire negotiations hang in the balance. President Donald Trump dismissed Iran’s latest proposal as “garbage,” citing demands that the U.S. recognize Iranian sovereignty over the strait and lift the blockade before broader nuclear talks. Iran insists on control of the waterway as leverage. UN Secretary-General António Guterres has urged urgent de-escalation, warning that prolonged disruption threatens global food security and energy supplies, particularly in Africa.

Qatar has mediated some limited passages, including LNG shipments to Pakistan, but commercial traffic remains minimal. European nations including France and the UK have faced Iranian warnings against deploying naval forces to protect shipping.

Economic Ripple Effects

Oil prices have surged above $130 per barrel at times, though alternative routes and strategic reserves have mitigated immediate shortages. Global supply chains face delays, with shipping lines imposing war-risk surcharges up to $4,000 per container. Fertilizer and LNG flows have nearly halted, raising concerns for agriculture and energy in Asia and Europe.

Advertisement

Gulf producers like the UAE have rerouted some exports via pipelines or by turning off AIS transponders, but risks remain high. Iraq has revived overland routes through Syria for some crude shipments. Analysts warn that a prolonged closure could trigger demand destruction and long-term shifts in energy markets.

Military Posture and Risks

The IRGC Navy has expanded patrols and claims enhanced military significance for the enlarged zone. U.S. forces continue enforcing the blockade, with recent Pentagon-released footage showing strikes on Iranian tankers. Both sides report occasional skirmishes, though a fragile pause in major fighting holds for now.

Commercial operators avoid the area due to canceled insurance coverage and attack risks. Some vessels comply with Iranian rules — paying fees and declaring details — to secure safe passage, effectively acknowledging Tehran’s de facto control during the conflict.

Outlook and Potential Resolutions

No clear timeline exists for full reopening. Experts suggest that even after a ceasefire, clearing mines, restoring confidence and renegotiating security arrangements could take months. The U.S. has signaled willingness to resume escort operations if talks collapse, while Iran maintains it will keep restrictions until its demands are met.

Advertisement

The crisis underscores the strait’s enduring vulnerability as a geopolitical chokepoint. For now, selective transits by “friendly” or compliant vessels provide minimal relief, but the vast majority of global energy trade through the region remains paralyzed. As day 73 of restrictions passes, pressure mounts on negotiators in Washington, Tehran and regional capitals to find a path toward de-escalation before economic damage becomes irreversible.

Maritime security firms and insurers continue monitoring the situation closely. Shippers are advised to reroute via the Cape of Good Hope where possible, despite added costs and delays. The world watches as diplomacy struggles to reopen one of the planet’s most vital arteries for energy and commerce.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Lala unveils RTD yogurt smoothies

Published

on

Lala unveils RTD yogurt smoothies

The nutritional smoothies are available in four flavors.

Continue Reading

Business

Jon Moulton backs biotech firm Infex Therapeutics tackling ‘critical global threat’ of antibiotic resistance

Published

on

Business Live

Mr Moulton and GM&C Life Sciences Fund join £4.3m funding round

Infex Therapeutics has secured £4.3m in funding

Infex Therapeutics has secured £4.3m in funding(Image: Infex Therapeutics)

Venture capitalist Jon Moulton has backed a biotech firm that’s looking to tackle the “critical global threat” of infections that are resistant to antibiotics.

Infex Therapeutics, of Alderley Edge, has secured £4.3m in a funding round led by Mr Moulton alongside the GM&C Life Sciences Fund, managed by Catapult Ventures, and existing high net worth investors.

The company will use the funding to develop its pipeline of new anti-infectives targeting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and other “critical-priority infectious diseases”.

Dr Peter Jackson, CEO of Infex Therapeutics, said: “We are delighted to secure this investment led by Jon Moulton, with support from the Greater Manchester and Cheshire Lifescience Investment Fund and our existing investors.

Advertisement

“This funding represents strong validation of our progress in developing novel anti-infectives to address the critical global threat of antimicrobial resistance.”

Jon Moulton, founder of Better Capital and now chair of Infex Therapeutics, said: “We have supported Infex from the beginning and continue to be impressed by the company’s scientific progress and strategic execution.”

He highlighted Infex’s lead programme RESP-X, which is being trialled as a therapy for non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) patients.

And he said: ”This additional investment reflects our strong conviction in both the team and its innovative approach to tackling antimicrobial resistance.

Advertisement

Nick Wright, CEO of Catapult Ventures which manages the GM&C Life Sciences Fund, said: “Infex Therapeutics has made excellent scientific progress since we first invested several years ago. The company has clearly established itself as a world leader in the AMR and related space and the data it is generating is very compelling.”

Continue Reading

Business

ICL Israel Chemicals earnings ahead: Can fertilizer giant rebound?

Published

on


ICL Israel Chemicals earnings ahead: Can fertilizer giant rebound?

Continue Reading

Business

Elon Musk, Tim Cook and others to travel to China with US delegation: White House

Published

on

Elon Musk, Tim Cook and others to travel to China with US delegation: White House

President Donald Trump is slated to visit China this week, and according to a White House official, business figures including Elon Musk, Apple CEO Tim Cook and more than a dozen others will travel to China with the U.S. delegation.

Blackrock CEO Larry Fink, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, and Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon are some of the other figures listed.

Advertisement

TESLA RECALLS MORE THAN 218K VEHICLES OVER REARVIEW IMAGE ISSUE THAT POSES CRASH RISK

Elon Musk and Larry Fink

Elon Musk, chief executive officer of Tesla Inc., left, and Larry Fink, chief executive officer of BlackRock Inc., during the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Thursday, Jan. 22, 2026. (Krisztian Bocsi/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Others on the list provided by the White House official include Blackstone Chairman, CEO and co-founder Stephen Schwarzman, Cargill Board Chair and CEO Brian Sikes, Citi Board Chair and CEO Jane Fraser, Coherent CEO Jim Anderson, GE Aerospace chairman and CEO H. Lawrence Culp, Jr., Illumina CEO Jacob Thaysen, Mastercard CEO Michael Miebach, Meta President and Vice Chairman Dina Powell McCormick, Micron Chairman, President and CEO Sanjay Mehrotra, Qualcomm President and CEO Cristiano Amon and Visa CEO Ryan McInerney.

“I am very much looking forward to my trip to China, an amazing Country, with a Leader, President Xi, respected by all,” Trump declared in a Monday Truth Social post. 

GORDON CHANG WARNS CHINESE EVS ENTERING US VIA CANADA COULD BECOME ‘ROLLING SPY MACHINES’

Advertisement
President Trump shakes hands with Apple CEO Tim Cook

Apple CEO Tim Cook (R) shakes hands with U.S. President Donald Trump during an event in the Oval Office of the White House on Aug. 6, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (Win McNamee/Getty Images / Getty Images)

“Great things will happen for both Countries!” he added.

President Donald Trump met with Chinese President Xi Jinping in October in South Korea, according to Reuters.

EX-WHITE HOUSE ‘AI CZAR’ SAYS US, CHINA COULD FIND AI COMMON GROUND DESPITE FIERCE RIVALRY

U.S. President Donald Trump shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping

U.S. President Donald Trump greets Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of a bilateral meeting at Gimhae Air Base on Oct. 30, 2025 in Busan, South Korea. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images / Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

Advertisement

During his first term, Trump visited China in 2017.

Continue Reading

Business

Rich Products Corp. is bulking up breakfast options

Published

on

Rich Products Corp. is bulking up breakfast options

Company is launching protein-forward breakfast innovations. 

Continue Reading

Business

At Close of Business podcast May 12 2026

Published

on

At Close of Business podcast May 12 2026

Elisha Newell and Nadia Budihardjo discuss MLG founder Murray Leahy’s board transition.

Continue Reading

Business

Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group Wins Trademark Appeal Against Beverly Hills Polo Club

Published

on

Mike Ashley's Frasers Group Wins Trademark Appeal Against Beverly Hills Polo Club

Mike Ashley’s retail empire has scored a notable courtroom victory after the Court of Appeal threw out a substantial damages award handed down in a protracted trademark infringement dispute, sparing the FTSE-listed group what could have proved a punishing financial blow.

The ruling brings to a head a long-running tussle between the Shirebrook-based discount sports chain, rebranded as Frasers Group in 2019, and Lifestyle Equities, the company that owns and licenses the Beverly Hills Polo Club marque. Lifestyle Equities had alleged that Ashley’s group infringed its trademark by flogging goods under the rival ‘Santa Monica Polo Club’ label, a claim it first lodged back in 2018.

Frasers had lost the underlying infringement case seven years ago but mounted a fresh challenge against the scale of damages it was ordered to stump up. At an appeal hearing in April, the retailer’s lawyers argued that the bill should be slashed because the third-party companies trading under the Beverly Hills Polo Club name, and on whose behalf Lifestyle Equities was attempting to recover losses, had never been officially registered as licensees in the United Kingdom.

The Court of Appeal duly sided with the high street giant, ruling that it was “too late” for Lifestyle Equities to retrospectively register the licences in question. With the original claim dating back to 2018 and the licensing arrangements stretching back nearly a decade, the court concluded that the additional claims “appear to be well out of time” and that allowing them through would amount to an “unprincipled windfall” for businesses that had not properly placed themselves on the public register.

Counsel for Frasers warned during the appeal that permitting such claims to succeed would expose accused infringers to ambush litigation, leaving defendants “suddenly confronted with a Trojan Horse full of licensees claiming damages” of whose existence they had no prior knowledge. Without strict adherence to public registration, the retailer’s legal team argued, the regime risked becoming “a charter of unjust enrichment”, allowing trademark owners to scoop up compensation for unregistered partners alongside their own losses.

Advertisement

The judgment represents a material win for Frasers, which has shrugged off a potentially eye-watering damages bill that, had it stood, would have set an awkward precedent for the wider retail sector. The decision is likely to be studied closely by intellectual property lawyers and brand owners alike, given the implications for how licensing arrangements must be formally documented to be enforceable in the British courts.

The legal win follows news first reported by City AM that the magic circle-adjacent law firm RPC has lost one of its highest-billing partners, Jeremy Drew, who represents Ashley personally, to Taylor Wessing.

The trademark victory comes hard on the heels of an extraordinary admission by Ashley, the man who founded Sports Direct in his native Burnham in 1982 and ran it as chief executive until handing the reins to son-in-law Michael Murray in 2022.

The 61-year-old billionaire has confirmed publicly for the first time that he engineered the downfall of his most prominent retail adversary, the former JD Sports executive chairman Peter Cowgill.

Advertisement

Cowgill stepped down from the FTSE 100 trainer chain in 2022 in the wake of a Competition and Markets Authority probe, triggered after leaked footage emerged of him in a clandestine car park meeting with Footasylum chief executive Barry Brown. The pair had been expressly barred from exchanging commercially sensitive information while JD Sports was attempting to acquire Footasylum, and the leaked footage led the CMA to impose fines of nearly £5m on the two businesses.

In an interview with the Financial Times last weekend, Ashley conceded that the footage had been obtained by one of his own employees and said he was “not hiding from the fact” that he was the architect of Cowgill’s removal, a candid acknowledgement that lifts the lid on one of the more colourful boardroom feuds in recent British retail history.


Jamie Young

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

MOSH raises $13 million

Published

on

MOSH raises $13 million

Bar brand to roll out nationwide into Target, debut new protein bar.

Continue Reading

Business

Last-minute budget pitch to 'level field' for young

Published

on

Last-minute budget pitch to 'level field' for young

Treasurer Jim Chalmers, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Finance Minister Katy Gallagher have released a video online to confirm tax changes for property owners.

Continue Reading

Business

Starmer Confirms Public Ownership Plan for Scunthorpe

Published

on

Britain’s steelmakers are bracing for a sharp escalation in trade tensions after the United States signalled it will double import tariffs on UK steel to 50% from Wednesday — despite a recent transatlantic deal to remove such duties.

Sir Keir Starmer has confirmed that British Steel will be taken into full public ownership, ending months of speculation about the future of the loss-making Scunthorpe plant and drawing a line under fraught negotiations with its Chinese owner, Jingye.

In a speech designed in part to head off a brewing leadership challenge after Labour’s bruising local election results, the prime minister told supporters that emergency legislation would be laid before Parliament this week to grant ministers the powers needed to take “full ownership” of the business, subject to a public interest test.

“Public ownership is in the public interest,” Sir Keir said, adding that he intended to prove his “doubters” wrong and that, for the British public, “change cannot come quickly enough.”

The decision marks a significant shift in approach. Whitehall had previously stopped short of full nationalisation, preferring instead to court private investors while keeping the blast furnaces alight through an emergency supervision regime. That regime was imposed last April after the government seized operational control of the Scunthorpe site amid mounting concerns that Jingye was preparing to switch the furnaces off, a step that would almost certainly have ended the United Kingdom’s ability to produce so-called virgin steel.

Virgin steel, smelted from iron ore rather than recycled scrap, is the grade used in heavy infrastructure projects, from new rail lines to large-scale construction. Restarting a blast furnace once it has gone cold is both technically forbidding and extraordinarily expensive, and the loss of that domestic capability has been viewed in Westminster as a strategic red line.

Advertisement

Talks with Jingye, the prime minister confirmed, had failed to produce a workable deal. “A commercial sale has not been possible, and now a public test could be met,” he said.

The response from the steel sector was swift and broadly supportive. Gareth Stace, director-general of trade body UK Steel, said the announcement offered “vital certainty” to the 2,700-strong Scunthorpe workforce, as well as the customers who rely on British Steel for rail, structural sections and specialist products.

“Maintaining domestic production capability for British Steel’s products is essential not only for economic growth but also for our national security and resilience,” Stace said.

However, he was clear that nationalisation alone would not be sufficient. “It is not an end goal,” he cautioned, urging ministers to use the moment as the “beginning of a clear and credible long-term plan for British Steel,” underpinned by a proper investment strategy.

Advertisement

The unions echoed that sentiment. In a joint statement, Roy Rickhuss, general secretary of the Community union, and Unite’s Sharon Graham said they “fully support” nationalisation, arguing that British Steel had a “bright future, with a world class highly skilled workforce making strategically important steels for the UK’s rail and infrastructure.” The pair also pressed the Treasury to mandate that government-funded projects source British-made steel — a long-standing demand of the domestic industry.

Charlotte Brumpton-Childs, national secretary of the GMB Union, said it was “right the government does everything in its power to secure its long term future.”

The Exchequer’s bill for propping up the company has already proved eye-watering. The National Audit Office reported in March that £377 million had been spent in just nine months to fund operations, wages and raw materials at Scunthorpe. Should the present rate of spending persist, the NAO warned, the total could exceed £1.5 billion by 2028, “depending on policy choices that may be taken in the future.”

The BBC understands the government is currently spending in the region of £1 million a day to keep the business afloat. Jingye, for its part, claimed the site was haemorrhaging £700,000 a day and was no longer commercially viable before ministers intervened.

Advertisement

No headline figure has yet been put on the cost of full nationalisation. Officials say an independent valuation of the business will be carried out once legislation is in place, with any compensation due to Jingye to be determined on the basis of that exercise.

It is not the first time the state has stepped in. The Insolvency Service ran British Steel for nine months following its 2019 collapse, at a cost to the taxpayer of around £600 million, before its sale to Jingye.

For the SME supply chain, the fabricators, hauliers and engineering firms clustered around Scunthorpe and across the wider Humber industrial corridor, the announcement removes the immediate threat of a catastrophic shutdown. Many of these businesses operate on tight margins and would have struggled to survive the loss of their principal customer.

The broader question, however, is whether public ownership can deliver the modernisation that successive private owners have failed to fund. Decarbonising primary steelmaking, replacing ageing blast furnaces with electric arc technology, and securing reliable long-term contracts with British infrastructure projects will all require capital commitments measured in billions, not millions.

Advertisement

The public interest test required to complete the takeover will weigh national security, the protection of critical national infrastructure and broader economic considerations. On all three counts, the government appears to have concluded that the case for intervention is now unanswerable.


Jamie Young

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025