This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Fans of the New York Times’ popular word-grouping game Connections have a fresh puzzle to work through for Saturday, Aug. 22, 2026, marking game number 1,168 in the daily franchise. Below are hints organized by difficulty level, followed by the complete answer set for anyone ready to check their work.

Connections challenges players to sort 16 words into four groups of four, with each group sharing a hidden theme or connection. The puzzle assigns a color-coded difficulty level to each category: yellow represents the most straightforward group, followed by green, then blue, with purple reserved for the trickiest and most conceptually deceptive category of the day. Players are allowed up to four incorrect guesses before the puzzle ends and the full solution is revealed automatically. The game, created by New York Times puzzle editor Wyna Liu, launched in beta in June 2023 and has since grown into the second-most-played puzzle in the Times’ games lineup, trailing only Wordle itself in overall popularity.

According to Tom’s Guide, which rates each day’s puzzle difficulty on a five-point scale using its own Connections Companion tool, Saturday’s puzzle scored a relatively low 1.3 out of 5, indicating an easier-than-average solve compared with earlier in the week.

Here are hints for each of today’s four categories, presented from easiest to hardest.

The yellow group, the most straightforward of the day, centers on a set of common workshop tools used for cutting and shaping wood. One hint offered by puzzle solvers described it simply as “handy,” a nod to tools used to drive nails, carve wood and smooth surfaces.

The green group focuses on a specific category of fruit, distinguished by compound names that each begin with a different descriptive word attached to the same base term. One clue offered for this category noted that “summer makes them sweeter,” pointing toward warm-weather produce.

The blue group centers on settings commonly found on an adjustable garden hose nozzle, the kind used to water plants or wash a car, with each answer representing a different spray pattern. A hint circulating among puzzle solvers specifically noted, “Don’t forget to water the plants.”

The purple group, traditionally the most conceptually challenging category each day, links four well-known cultural references that all share a common trailing word. According to hints shared by solvers, the connection draws from entertainment and pop culture more broadly, spanning references from television, film and music. One clue pointed players toward well-known “Girls” references, comparing the category to groups like Destiny’s Child or the ensemble cast of the sitcom “Living Single.”

Spoiler warning: The full answer set for today’s Connections puzzle follows below.

The complete answers for NYT Connections puzzle number 1,168, published Saturday, Aug. 22, 2026, are as follows:

Yellow Group — Carpentry Tools: CHISEL, HAMMER, PLANE, SAW

Green Group — Kinds of Melon: BITTER, MUSK, WATER, WINTER

Blue Group — Garden Hose Settings: CONE, JET, MIST, SHOWER

Purple Group — ___ Girls of Pop Culture: GILMORE, GOLDEN, MEAN, SPICE

The purple category proved to be the day’s trickiest grouping precisely because its connecting word, “Girls,” follows each answer rather than preceding it, and because two of the four words carried plausible alternative meanings that could easily mislead solvers. GOLDEN could reasonably be read as a descriptor tied to age or color, while MEAN might just as easily be interpreted as either “average” in a mathematical sense or “unkind” in a personal one, rather than immediately calling to mind the 2004 teen comedy film “Mean Girls.” GILMORE and SPICE, by contrast, tended to be recognized more quickly by solvers given their strong and specific associations with the television drama “Gilmore Girls” and the pop group Spice Girls, respectively.

Several of the puzzle’s other categories also included deliberate decoys designed to mislead solvers into premature groupings. The words PLANE and JET, for instance, could easily tempt players into forming an aviation-themed group together, when in fact PLANE belonged to the carpentry tools category and JET belonged to the garden hose settings group instead. Similarly, CONE might initially suggest an ice cream treat or a traffic cone to many solvers, rather than its actual role as a specific spray pattern setting found on garden hose nozzles.

For players hoping to preserve a winning streak or avoid accidentally spoiling the puzzle for themselves, Connections resets at midnight local time each day, consistent with the New York Times’ broader approach to its daily puzzle offerings, meaning today’s puzzle and its answers will remain the same for all players regardless of time zone, while a fresh puzzle becomes available starting at each individual player’s local midnight.

This article was written by

Follow

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha’s Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Tesla and SpaceX confirmed Thursday that they will jointly build a massive semiconductor manufacturing facility called Terafab in Grimes County, Texas, with an initial investment of $16.8 billion for a project the companies say will become the largest and most valuable building on Earth.

The facility will be located roughly 70 miles northwest of Houston, in a rural stretch of Grimes County east of College Station, according to multiple outlets covering the announcement. Elon Musk, who serves as chief executive of both Tesla and SpaceX, described the scale of the planned building in a post on the social platform X. “Terafab Texas will be the largest and most valuable building on Earth by far. And it will be stunningly beautiful,” Musk wrote.

According to figures shared by SpaceX and Tesla, the completed facility is planned to span more than 100 million square feet of manufacturing space, a footprint more than five times larger than the New Century Global Center in Chengdu, China, which currently holds the record as the world’s largest building at approximately 18.9 million square feet, according to Fortune. The Terafab campus is also expected to be more than twice the size of Tesla’s existing 2,500-acre Gigafactory site outside Austin, according to the Austin American-Statesman.

SpaceX described the strategic rationale behind the project in a statement posted to its website. “The facility will be an advanced semiconductor fab that will bridge the divide between current global chip supply and the compute demand of the future,” the statement read. The company further explained that the combined chip demand from Tesla and SpaceX alone is expected to exceed available global supply in the coming years. “While we are deeply appreciative of our current chip suppliers and encourage them to expand production whenever possible, this looming gulf between supply and demand is at the core of Terafab’s necessity,” SpaceX said, according to Fox Business.

Musk framed the project as central to his broader vision for the future of both companies, one built around large-scale automation, autonomous transportation and space-based computing infrastructure. “We’re now embarking on the most epic chip-building effort—combining logic, memory, and advanced packaging all under one roof,” Musk said in a press release cited by Fortune. According to the same report, Musk described Terafab’s mission as helping to “close the gap” between current chip production capacity and the far larger demand he expects will eventually accompany humanity’s expansion into space.

Musk expanded on that broader vision in comments made when first announcing the project. “In order to understand the universe, you must explore the universe,” Musk said, according to Yahoo Finance. “And that’s the motivation to accelerate humanity’s future in understanding the universe and extending the light of consciousness to the stars.”

According to Yahoo Finance, the Terafab facility is expected to target production of advanced 2-nanometer chips, with a goal of manufacturing up to 50 times the number of AI chips currently produced annually by major global chip suppliers. The plant is designed to produce two distinct categories of semiconductors: chips intended for Tesla’s self-driving vehicles, robotaxis and Optimus humanoid robots, and separate, specialized chips engineered to withstand the extreme conditions of space for use in SpaceX’s satellite and spacecraft systems. According to Fortune, the completed facility is designed to produce more than 1 terawatt of compute annually once fully operational.

The initial phase of construction is expected to create at least 3,000 jobs, with many of those positions expected to go to residents of Grimes and neighboring Brazos counties, according to the Houston Chronicle. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott addressed the scale of the project’s initial economic impact directly, according to Fortune’s reporting. “The first phase of the Terafab project represents a capital investment of more than $16.8 billion and will create 3,000 new jobs,” Abbott said.

The $16.8 billion figure represents only the first phase of a project SpaceX has suggested could ultimately grow far larger. According to TechCrunch, SpaceX has indicated in regulatory filings that it may spend as much as $119 billion on Terafab across a multi-phase construction plan, though the company did not discuss the project during its most recent earnings call. Semiconductor giant Intel has also agreed to contribute to the Terafab project, though the company has not disclosed the specific scale of its involvement, according to TechCrunch’s reporting.

Local officials in Grimes County have moved to address community concerns regarding the project’s rapid development and the tax incentives associated with it. According to the Austin American-Statesman, Terafab representatives, including a company official identified as Trettel, stressed the project’s goal of strengthening domestic chip manufacturing capacity and boosting the local job market during meetings with area residents. County commissioners were told they could expect to see architectural renderings of the planned facility within the coming days. Terafab representatives also defended the property tax breaks the project has received from Grimes County and area school districts, pointing to a structure under which the company will make fixed annual payments to the county over the next 35 years in place of standard property tax obligations.

Some financial analysts have offered independent cost estimates for the project that diverge somewhat from the companies’ own figures. According to Yahoo Finance, some analysts project the facility could ultimately cost more than $20 billion, placing it among the largest individual semiconductor manufacturing investments in the world, at a moment when major technology companies, including Meta Platforms, are racing to secure reliable chip supply amid an industrywide memory shortage.

Tesla and SpaceX confirmed the joint venture also includes participation from xAI, Musk’s artificial intelligence company, alongside Intel’s previously disclosed involvement, according to the Houston Chronicle. As construction on Terafab’s first phase moves forward in Grimes County, the project is expected to remain closely watched both for its unprecedented physical scale and for what it signals about the scope of Musk’s ambitions to vertically integrate chip production across his network of companies, spanning applications ranging from autonomous vehicles and humanoid robots on Earth to specialized computing hardware intended for use in space.

Bronny James has finally addressed his father LeBron James’ decision to sign with the Philadelphia 76ers this offseason, offering a brief, five-word reaction after weeks of speculation about how the younger James felt watching his father leave the Los Angeles Lakers.

The 21-year-old guard was captured on video Friday signing autographs and taking photos with young fans when he was asked directly about his father joining a new team. According to Yahoo Sports, Bronny’s response was simple and unbothered. “It’s whatever. It’s my dad,” he said, delivering the line with a smile, according to a video shared by Purp & Gold Media on the social platform X.

The moment marked the first public comment from Bronny since LeBron officially confirmed his decision to leave the Lakers after eight seasons with the franchise. Speculation had circulated for weeks over whether Bronny might follow his father to a new team, given that the two had made NBA history as the first father-son duo to play together in league history during Bronny’s first two professional seasons. Instead, Bronny remains with the Lakers, the team that selected him with the 55th overall pick in the 2024 NBA Draft, while LeBron begins a new chapter in Philadelphia.

LeBron’s departure ended an eight-year run in Los Angeles that included the franchise’s 2020 NBA championship and cemented his standing as one of the most accomplished players in Lakers history. Across 479 regular-season games with the team, LeBron averaged 25.9 points, 7.9 assists and 7.7 rebounds before ultimately deciding to continue his career elsewhere. He signed a two-year, $8 million contract with the 76ers for what will be his 24th NBA season, a milestone unmatched by any player in league history.

LeBron addressed the decision directly in a statement posted to social media at the time of the announcement, describing it as the final chapter of his storied career. “This is my last decision. I’m not going for money. I’m not going for family. I still want to sacrifice. I still want to work. I still want to grind. I still want to compete, to win and to have a chance at the feeling of winning another championship,” James wrote. He went on to express enthusiasm specifically about his new team’s prospects. “I believe I can help make the Philadelphia 76ers a championship team and I am so excited to energize a new fan base and start this incredible journey one last time.”

Bronny’s path forward with the Lakers became clearer in the weeks leading up to his father’s decision. In late June, Bronny’s $2.3 million salary for the 2026-27 season became fully guaranteed after the Lakers declined to waive him ahead of a contractual deadline. According to Fox News, LeBron informed the Lakers of his own decision to continue his career elsewhere just one day after that guarantee became official, a sequence of events that effectively separated the father-son duo’s NBA paths going forward.

Rich Paul, who serves as agent for both LeBron and Bronny, addressed the situation publicly around the time of LeBron’s signing, making clear that the two were operating independently of one another in free agency. “They are not a package deal,” Paul told ESPN, adding that there was “no current plan or request for Bronny James to join his father” in Philadelphia.

Bronny’s second NBA season saw him splitting time between the Lakers and the team’s G League affiliate, the South Bay Lakers, a common developmental path for young players still working to establish themselves at the professional level. Across 42 NBA games during that second season, Bronny averaged 2.9 points and 1.2 assists, while also making eight postseason appearances for the Lakers. Heading into his third season, Bronny’s role is expected to remain focused primarily on continued development under Lakers head coach JJ Redick, who has overseen his growth since the start of his professional career.

Bronny delivered his five-word reaction while traveling with the rest of the Lakers roster to Slovenia for a basketball camp organized by star guard Luka Doncic, according to Yahoo Sports. The trip placed Bronny in a casual, fan-facing setting when the question about his father’s move was posed, contributing to the relaxed, matter-of-fact tone of his response.

LeBron’s move to Philadelphia has generated significant reaction across the NBA, including from members of his new team. According to The Philadelphia Inquirer, forward Jaylen Brown, despite past public tension with LeBron over comments Brown had made questioning Bronny’s readiness for professional basketball, was among the first players to publicly welcome LeBron to the Sixers following the announcement, posting a brief celebratory message on social media. Teammate Tyrese Maxey similarly shared a video of himself celebrating enthusiastically after the news broke.

Despite no longer playing alongside one another, LeBron and Bronny are still scheduled to face off against each other multiple times this coming season as opponents. According to Yahoo Sports, the Lakers and 76ers are set to meet on Christmas Day at 5 p.m. ET in Los Angeles, followed by a second matchup on March 2, 2027, in Philadelphia, giving fans two high-profile opportunities to watch the father and son compete against one another for the first time in their NBA careers.

With LeBron now fully settled into his new chapter with the 76ers and Bronny entering his third professional season still developing within the Lakers organization, Bronny’s brief comment appears to reflect a broader sense of acceptance regarding the situation, treating his father’s decision as a straightforward professional matter rather than a significant personal disruption. As both players prepare for the 2026-27 season with their respective teams, their upcoming head-to-head matchups are likely to draw significant attention as one of the more closely watched storylines of the coming NBA campaign.

NEW YORK — A federal judge in Manhattan struck down a Trump administration policy Friday that had suspended the issuance of immigrant visas to applicants from 75 countries, ruling that the policy exceeded the statutory authority of Secretary of State Marco Rubio and violated federal immigration law.

U.S. District Judge Jeannette Vargas of the Southern District of New York issued the ruling in a lawsuit brought by immigrant rights groups, along with individual visa applicants and U.S. citizens sponsoring family members from the affected countries. Vargas, an appointee of former President Joe Biden, found that the policy, implemented in January, was “contrary to law” and fell outside Rubio’s legal authority.

In her written decision, Vargas was direct in her characterization of the policy’s legal standing. “The Policy, which categorically prohibits the issuance of immigrant visas based upon the nationality of the applicant, represents a direct abrogation of this statutory scheme,” Vargas wrote, according to Reuters. The judge determined the policy ran afoul of a 1965 federal law barring nationality-based discrimination in the granting of visas, as well as a separate statutory provision that strips the secretary of state of direct authority over how individual consular officers adjudicate visa applications.

According to CNN, Vargas found that, in practice, U.S. consular officers were being directed to reject immigrant visa applications, even from applicants who could demonstrate they were financially self-sufficient, solely based on the applicant’s country of origin. The policy specifically halted permanent-residence visas for individuals seeking to join family members or take up employment in the United States, though it did not extend to nonimmigrant visas such as those issued for tourism or academic study.

A State Department cable sent by Rubio to every diplomatic and consular post worldwide, which was entered into the court record as part of the case, directed officers to refuse applicants even in cases where an applicant “provides additional evidence that demonstrates he or she overcomes the public charge refusal,” according to CNN’s review of the document. Vargas characterized the practical effect of that directive bluntly in her ruling. “The outcome is predetermined,” she wrote. “The visa will be refused.”

The State Department had defended the policy by arguing that applicants from the 75 designated countries posed a heightened risk of becoming a “public charge,” meaning they might rely on local, state or federal government assistance after arriving in the United States, according to Reuters. The suspended countries spanned a wide geographic range, including Latin American nations such as Brazil, Colombia and Uruguay; Balkan countries including Bosnia and Albania; South Asian nations Pakistan and Bangladesh; and numerous countries across Africa, the Middle East and the Caribbean, according to Reuters’ reporting.

The lawsuit challenging the policy was filed by the Catholic Legal Immigration Network and African Communities Together, immigrant rights organizations that joined with individual visa applicants and U.S. citizens sponsoring family members from the affected countries as plaintiffs in the case, according to Reuters.

According to reporting from SCOTUS Wire, Vargas specifically distinguished her ruling from the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Trump v. Hawaii, which had upheld a separate Trump administration travel ban permitting nationality-based restrictions on entry into the United States. Vargas drew that distinction on the grounds that the current policy directly restricted the issuance of visas themselves, rather than restricting entry at the border for individuals who had already obtained valid travel documents, a legal difference the judge found significant in assessing the scope of the executive branch’s authority under existing immigration statutes.

Al Jazeera’s coverage of the ruling noted that Vargas’ decision centered specifically on the question of statutory authority, finding that Congress had explicitly reserved to consular officers, rather than the secretary of state directly, the authority to adjudicate individual immigrant visa applications, a structural allocation of power the judge found the January policy had improperly overridden.

The State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the ruling, according to Reuters. As of this report, it remained unclear whether the administration intended to appeal Vargas’ decision to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, a step commonly taken by the federal government following adverse rulings on major immigration policy matters.

Friday’s ruling adds to a broader, ongoing pattern of legal challenges facing the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement priorities during its second term. The administration has pursued what Reuters described as an aggressive approach to restricting various forms of visa issuance and immigration processing since returning to office, a strategy that has repeatedly drawn legal challenges from immigrant rights organizations, state attorneys general and individual plaintiffs affected by specific policies.

The 75-country visa suspension represents one of several immigration-related policies from the current administration to face significant legal setbacks in federal court. Earlier iterations of broad, nationality-based travel restrictions pursued by the Trump administration during its first term similarly drew successful legal challenges in multiple jurisdictions before the Supreme Court ultimately upheld a narrower, revised version of that earlier travel ban in the 2018 Trump v. Hawaii decision, a precedent Vargas’ ruling explicitly distinguished from the current case.

Immigrant rights advocates involved in the litigation are likely to view Friday’s ruling as a significant victory, given the broad geographic scope of the policy the judge struck down and the explicit finding that the policy’s practical operation left consular officers with no genuine discretion to approve applications regardless of individual applicants’ financial circumstances. For families and individuals affected by the suspension, including U.S. citizens seeking to sponsor relatives for immigrant visas from any of the 75 designated countries, Vargas’ ruling would, if it stands, restore the ability to have those applications processed and adjudicated on an individual basis rather than being categorically denied based on nationality alone.

As the legal fight over the policy continues, with an appeal from the administration considered a likely next step, immigration attorneys and advocacy organizations are expected to closely monitor how quickly the State Department moves to comply with Vargas’ order and resume standard visa processing for applicants from the affected countries, pending any further action either from the administration or from a higher court reviewing the case.