Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Business

Windfall Tax UK 2026: Reeves Raises Electricity Generator Levy to 55%

Published

on

Windfall Tax UK 2026: Reeves Raises Electricity Generator Levy to 55%

Rachel Reeves has tightened the squeeze on renewable energy generators, raising the windfall tax on wind and solar producers from 45 per cent to 55 per cent in a move the Chancellor insists will stop the sector “cashing in” on the latest Middle East oil and gas shock.

The increase to the electricity generators levy (EGL), announced on Tuesday, has been timed to land alongside a sweeping set of power market reforms from Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, designed to “break the link” between volatile gas prices and the cost of electricity paid by households and businesses.

For Britain’s small and medium-sized employers, still nursing the scars of the 2022 energy crisis, the stakes could scarcely be higher. Industry figures, however, have been quick to brand the package a “sham”, warning it risks locking consumers and businesses into higher bills for decades and chilling the investment climate for renewables just as ministers are trying to court record capital inflows.

Under the existing system, many wind and solar farms still sell power on the wholesale market while drawing a top-up subsidy through the legacy renewables obligation (RO) scheme. The Treasury’s new design offers a carrot alongside the stick: generators who voluntarily switch to fixed-price contracts for difference (CfDs) will be exempt from the higher levy.

Ministers argue this will decouple renewables revenues from wholesale electricity prices, which are still set by the most expensive marginal plant on the system — almost invariably gas. Under the current merit-order pricing, even when the vast majority of power is coming from wind or solar, all generators are paid the gas-set price whenever a gas plant is called on.

Advertisement

“Hardworking British families and businesses should not bear the brunt of global gas price shocks while electricity generators are making exceptional profits,” Ms Reeves said. She added that moving generators onto CfDs, combined with the 55 per cent levy, would “offer households and businesses stronger protection against future energy shocks”.

But the numbers lay bare why the voluntary switch may prove a hard sell. An RO certificate is currently worth £69.34. An onshore wind farm under the RO receives one certificate per megawatt hour (MWh) generated, on top of the wholesale price. At 5pm on Monday, with wholesale prices at £99 per MWh, that produced a total return of £168.43 per MWh. Offshore wind, which earns up to 1.9 certificates per MWh, could have banked as much as £230.75 per MWh at the same moment.

One senior energy industry source warned that handing such generators fresh 20-year CfDs on top of their existing RO entitlements amounted to a “double subsidy”, and could keep consumer bills elevated well beyond the RO’s planned 2027-to-2037 phase-out.

Dale Vince, the green energy entrepreneur and Labour donor, went further. “The Government are not breaking the link. I’m very disappointed with that,” he said. “Something real has to be done because we’re in the second energy crisis of this decade.”

Advertisement

Kathryn Porter, the independent energy analyst, cautioned that the levy could also hasten the retirement of Britain’s ageing nuclear fleet, which falls within the windfall tax’s scope. “The whole thing is a mess. This entire plan might end up smoothing costs at a higher level than they are now,” she said.

Tara Singh, chief executive of RenewableUK, struck a more diplomatic note, saying the industry supported weakening the gas-electricity link and would “work constructively” with officials. But she warned that investor confidence was on the line. “At a time when ministers are hoping to attract record levels of investment into renewables, uncertainty over changes to taxation needs to be clarified immediately so it does not drive up the cost of investment.”

Ministers also signalled they would tackle the rising sums paid to wind farms to switch off when grid capacity is constrained, a cost ultimately borne by bill-payers, including the nation’s 5.5 million SMEs.

For Mr Miliband, the wider message is a political one. “As we face the second fossil fuel shock in less than five years, the lesson for our country is clear,” he said. “The era of fossil fuel security is over, and the era of clean energy security must come of age.”

Advertisement

The Government will now consult on the detail of the market overhaul. For British business owners watching their energy bills with nervous eyes, the question is no longer whether reform is needed, but whether Ms Reeves and Mr Miliband have hit on the right formula, or merely swapped one distortion for another.


Jamie Young

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Derelict site by railway station to become shops and flat

Published

on

Business Live

Developer says plan will ‘enhance the vitality of the local area’

The site was described as "derelict and overgrown"

The Birkenhead site was described as “derelict and overgrown”(Image: Google Street View)

A “derelict and overgrown site” next to a Merseyrail station in Birkenhead could be brought “back to life” as new plans have been put forward. Wirral Council has been told the new plan “supports economic activity” and “enhances the vitality of the local area”.

Advertisement

Plans have gone into Wirral Council for two commercial units to be built on the ground floor of a new building and one residential flat on the first floor. The development would be built on the corner of Station Road and Stanley Road in the north end of Birkenhead.

The site sits very close to Birkenhead North station, which offers a large park and ride car park as well as Ilchester Park. Diverse Design Collective who have pitched the plans to the local authority said it would be “bringing back to life a derelict and overgrown site in a prominent location”.

The two shops would cover an area of 64 square metres while the first floor flat would be accessed separately. A design and access statement document attached to the application said: “The proposed development site, owned by the applicant, is a large vacant plot that has been derelict and overgrown for some time.”

The document points to a number of buildings in the area including a nearby ASDA and Iceland. According to the planning application, this “provides precedent for more commercial appearing buildings in the context, meaning further commercial units would not appear out of place”.

Advertisement

The Diverse Design Collective said the plans “seek to open up and utilise a wasted site on a very prominent position within Birkenhead” with a “modest and proportionate” development. They said this “represents an efficient and appropriate use of a vacant urban site”.

Pointing to its computer generated images of how the site would look, the design statement said: “We feel these images adequately show that the proposals not only seamlessly connect with the context in materiality and scale, but subtly provide an engaging street scene that is simultaneously not overly prominent, yet activates the street.”

The document added: “We feel the proposed building would be suitable for the application site and would not feel out of place in scale or appearance to the surrounding dwellings of this area and will not impact the streetscape in any way.

“The proposed high-quality palette of materials would be in keeping with and compliment the character of the area and we feel the overall proposals will be a huge improvement on the appearance of the existing vacant and derelict site in such a prominent position. The predominant use of red brick will respect the surrounding dwellings and character of the adjacent train station, all of which are red brick.”

Advertisement

To find all the planning applications, traffic diversions, road layout changes, alcohol licence applications and more in your community, visit the Public Notices Portal.

Continue Reading

Business

Apple faces Indian engineer’s bias lawsuit

Published

on

The Economic Times
Apple Inc. lost an early round in a discrimination lawsuit brought in the U.S. by a female engineer from India who says her two managers — one from her country, the other from Pakistan — treated her as they would in their own countries: as a subservient.

The woman’s case in California state court is the latest to allege workplace bias in Silicon Valley that focuses on cultural prejudices of some tech workers from South Asia. Cisco Systems Inc. is fighting a suit brought by California’s civil rights agency alleging bias against a member of India’s so-called lower castes, known as Dalits.

Anita Nariani Schulze is part of the Sindhi minority — she is Hindu, with ancestry in the Sindh region of what is now Pakistan. Her complaint alleges that her senior and direct managers, both male, consistently excluded her from meetings while inviting her male counterparts, criticized her, micromanaged her work, and deprived her of bonuses, despite positive performance evaluations and significant team contributions.

Schulze claims the managers’ animus reflects sexism, racism, religious bias and discrimination on the basis of national origin. The Sindhi Hindu nationality is “known for its technical acumen” and its gender equality, she says, which “exacerbated the managers’ discriminatory treatment.”

Advertisement

In a tentative ruling on Wednesday, Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Sunil R. Kulkarni rejected Apple’s request to toss out the suit. While not ruling on the merits of the case, Kulkarni said Schulze had adequately supported her legal claims. Apple had argued her claims weren’t specific enough and were based on stereotypes.

But the judge rejected Schulze’s request to represent a class of female Apple employees who suffered job discrimination over the last four years. He agreed with Apple that she didn’t show a pattern of discrimination that could be applied to a broader group.