Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

$1M Loss as Trader Approves Phishing Token After Wallet Signature

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

A crypto user lost nearly $1 million after approving a malicious token permission on Ethereum, according to onchain tracking shared by Scam Sniffer. The incident highlights how phishing “token approvals” continue to evolve from one-off scams into repeatable theft workflows.

Scam Sniffer reported that the victim’s loss was 999,999 USDT (USDT) linked to an Ethereum phishing approval. The attacker first attempted to drain funds through multicall requests but failed due to insufficient balance, then immediately succeeded seconds later by executing follow-up transfers that removed the remaining funds.

Key takeaways

  • A single “approve” on an Ethereum token can grant an attacker sweeping power, allowing losses to be extracted quickly via automated transfers.
  • Scam Sniffer’s report describes multi-step draining: an initial multicall attempt may fail, but subsequent transactions can still empty the wallet.
  • Approval-phishing remains a widely used tactic within broader onchain scam ecosystems, including investment fraud.
  • Researchers warn that scammers often reuse the same wallet patterns—meaning one uncovered incident can reveal a broader network of activity.
  • Address poisoning still compounds the risk, and users should treat copied addresses and pasted contract or wallet data with extra caution.

A nearly $1 million theft triggered by a token approval

The phishing mechanism centers on token approvals that appear routine. In these scams, victims are tricked into signing a transaction that grants a malicious actor permission to spend tokens or route funds from the wallet. The approval itself may be presented as a small step—such as enabling a transfer, interaction, or “verification”—but it can instead grant broad or lasting access that the attacker immediately exploits.

In the reported case, Scam Sniffer said the script recalculated the victim’s remaining balance and then pulled the exact amount left after the first drain attempt. That meant the attacker did not need to guess the wallet’s contents—execution was adjusted in real time to maximize extraction.

On Etherscan, the scam’s activity is reflected across three transactions culminating in the extraction of 999,999 USDT. (See: Etherscan transaction.)

Advertisement

Why approval phishing keeps working

Approval phishing is a recurring pattern rather than a new trick. CertiK data cited in the coverage indicates that in 2025 phishing losses totaled $723 million across 248 incidents. The structure of these scams is consistent: social engineering prompts victims to click “approve,” but the approval hands over spending capability to an attacker-controlled contract.

CertiK’s figures are particularly important because they suggest the problem is not isolated. Approval phishing scales well for criminals: once a victim grants token permissions, the attacker can use that permission to drain balances without requiring ongoing interaction from the victim.

Industry-wide, the scale of phishing losses remains high. The article notes that the crypto sector recorded $366 million in phishing losses in the first half of the year, reinforcing that approval-based permission scams are part of a broader wave of onchain fraud rather than a niche threat.

Scammers reuse wallets and permission patterns

The broader risk is amplified when criminals reuse the same infrastructure and wallet targets. Earlier in the month, a separate incident was reported involving a victim losing $1.65 million after connecting to a fake exchange and signing a malicious contract. In that scenario, the approval gave attackers “unlimited access,” enabling an automated sweeper to drain funds, according to researcher Ryan Coleman.

Advertisement

Chainalysis previously reported that onchain scams pulled in at least $14 billion in 2025, with investment scams remaining a dominant category. In Chainalysis materials on approval phishing, the firm explains that approval-based tactics are one way investment fraud moves from social engineering into automated onchain theft.

Chainalysis also cautioned that criminals reuse the same wallets, leverage legitimate approval features from contracts, and employ consistent cash-out routes across victims. That reuse matters for investors and users because it changes what “one report” can mean: when investigators map recurring permission and withdrawal behaviors, it can expose a wider network of coordinated activity rather than a standalone attacker.

Chainalysis senior investigator Renato Bastos is quoted in the underlying coverage explaining that each uncovered report can reveal a broader network because scammers repeat wallet usage and operational paths. Readers should watch for whether similar approval signatures, contract patterns, or draining methods recur across incidents—those repetitions often indicate systematic campaigns.

Address poisoning adds another layer of risk

Phishing token approvals are not the only mechanism used to steal funds. The coverage also points to address poisoning, where scammers create wallet addresses that look similar to legitimate ones and then send small “dust” amounts to those near-matching addresses. When victims copy and paste the address, the dusted lookalike can cause users to send funds to the attacker rather than the intended recipient.

Advertisement

The risk is especially relevant on ecosystems where manual copy/paste workflows remain common. The article notes that MetaMask launched live address poisoning detection in June. That tool compares each pasted address with addresses the wallet has previously interacted with—designed to flag suspicious new or unexpected addresses that match known patterns for deception.

With both approval phishing and address poisoning in play, the common theme is user interaction: scams manipulate what people think they’re signing or sending. Defenses therefore require slowing down and verifying the exact permission or recipient address before proceeding.

What to watch next

Approval phishing incidents like the reported 999,999 USDT theft tend to spread quickly when criminals refine execution and reuse wallet patterns. Users should be alert to any signature request connected to token approvals, avoid rushing through prompts, and consider detection tools—while security teams and onchain analysts will likely continue tracking recurring draining scripts and shared infrastructure to identify campaigns before they expand further.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

AFX Enters the Perp DEX Race Hyperliquid Already Leads, How is It Different?

Published

on

AFX Enters the Perp DEX Race Hyperliquid Already Leads, How is It Different?

Perpetual futures are right now crypto’s most active trading category. DefiLlama data showed $21.9 billion in perp DEX volume over 24 hours on July 3, 2026, with open interest across derivatives protocols at about $15.5 billion.

But the market is dominated and defined by Hyperliquid. The exchange led the sector with about $250.5 billion in 30-day perp volume, leaving little serious competition at the top.

That gap explains why new trading chains are still entering the market. The demand is clear, but the winner is not yet protected by regulation, brand loyalty, or deep institutional lock-in.

AFX is one of the newer challengers. It is a sovereign Layer 1 built around perpetual futures, with a fully on-chain order book, on-chain matching and settlement, zero-gas execution, 100ms median latency, fair ordering, and MEV-resistant protection. 

Advertisement

On paper, the pitch is long. But the actual goal is simple: give traders Hyperliquid-style speed and liquidity, but with more of the trading stack moved fully on-chain.

AFX Daily Perp Volume and TVL. Source: DeFiLlama
Platform Core model What it has proved Where AFX differs
Hyperliquid Custom trading L1 Deep perp liquidity and strong trader adoption AFX follows a similar trading-chain thesis, but from a much earlier base
dYdX Chain Cosmos-based appchain Perp DEXs can leave shared execution environments AFX pushes more of the order flow and matching process on-chain
GMX Pooled liquidity and oracle pricing Traders will use pool-backed leverage without a central order book AFX is built around exchange-style order book trading
Drift Solana-native hybrid model Fast execution can support active perp trading AFX uses a sovereign L1 rather than Solana infrastructure
Lighter ZK-verified derivatives Verification can become part of exchange design All fees are redistributed to users
Aevo Rollup-based derivatives Derivatives can run through a dedicated rollup AFX takes the more vertically controlled L1 route

The comparison is not whether AFX has more features than these platforms. The real question is whether its design solves the problems that matter during live trading: fast order placement, reliable cancels, deep maker liquidity, stable liquidations, and predictable execution when markets move sharply.

AFX Vs. Hyperliquid and dYdX

AFX sits closest to Hyperliquid and dYdX, but the comparison is practical rather than one-to-one. 

Hyperliquid is the liquidity benchmark. It has already proved that a custom trading L1 can attract serious perp volume, open interest, and trader mindshare. 

AFX follows a similar high-performance trading-chain thesis, with 100ms median latency, zero-gas execution, on-chain orderbook trading, and deterministic ordering. Its challenge is proof: deeper liquidity, more market makers, and a longer record during volatile markets.

Advertisement

dYdX is the architecture benchmark. Its Cosmos-based chain uses in-memory orderbooks to keep trading fast while blocks sync the final state. 

AFX pushes more of the trading process on-chain, including order placement, matching, and settlement. That gives traders more visible execution data, but it also raises the performance test. 

Perp traders punish slow cancels, delayed matching, and weak liquidation systems quickly.

Advertisement

AFX Versus Lighter, Drift, and Aevo

Lighter, Drift, and Aevo really show how varied the perp DEX field has become:

  • Lighter emphasizes ZK verification for matching and liquidations;
  • Drift uses Solana-native execution with a hybrid system combining an AMM and a central limit orderbook;
  • Aevo uses an EVM-based optimistic rollup for derivatives trading.

AFX differs through vertical control. It uses a trading-specific L1 and aims to coordinate consensus, orderbook execution, settlement, margin, liquidation, APIs, and trader UX inside one dedicated system. 

This is also where the AI-agent angle becomes important. AFX offers agent wallets that can place, cancel, and modify orders, update leverage and margin mode, and receive private WebSocket data. 

Moreover, users can limit agent permissions for withdrawals, transfers, agent authorization, revocation, and vault operations.

Risk Design During Market Stress

Perp DEX quality becomes visible during volatile markets. Mark-price design, liquidation mechanics, and backstop liquidity determine whether traders face orderly execution or unstable loss socialization. A strong venue needs risk controls able to hold up when price moves become fast, liquidity thins, and leverage unwinds at once.

AFX highlights several risk controls: manipulation-resistant mark pricing based on native orderbook data and external exchange feeds, staged liquidations, backstop liquidity through its vault, and capped open interest per market. 

Security also deserves a word. Zellic’s public audit repository lists an AFX Bridge audit from May 2026 on EVM, which supports mention of a third-party audit for the bridge scope.

A Note on Incentives and Trader Alignment

Perp DEXs often compete through points, rebates, fee tiers, maker rewards, vault yield, and revenue sharing. These tools can seed order flow, attract market makers, and reward active traders, although long-term value depends on sticky liquidity after rewards cool.

Advertisement

AFX’s VIP Program is a great example, where high-volume traders can receive lower fees and a share of platform fee revenue, with 30% to 50% of protocol revenue allocated across eligible tiers. 

Importantly, AFX’s revenue sharing may help attract professional traders, but its durability will depend on execution quality, spreads, open interest, trader retention and more. 

AFX Tokenomics and Community Distribution

AFX’s tokenomics also support its active-trader positioning. The model is built around community distribution first, with 73% of the 1 billion token supply allocated across genesis distribution, protocol incentives, core community, and ecosystem development.

Advertisement

The largest single bucket is protocol incentives at 30%, which means the token model is designed to reward ongoing trading activity, liquidity participation, and node staking rather than only early access.

Genesis distribution accounts for 27% of supply and is fully unlocked at TGE, creating meaningful early float from day one instead of concentrating liquidity around delayed unlocks.

How AFX Promises to Distribute Its Revenue. Source: Medium

AFX also has no VC allocation and no private rounds, which gives the token model a user-participation angle rather than a private-investor allocation structure. Core contributors receive 19% of supply, but this allocation has no TGE unlock, a one-year cliff, and 36-month linear vesting. This ties contributor incentives to longer-term protocol development rather than immediate liquidity.

The treasury allocation is set at 8% and is intended for compliance, infrastructure, and risk reserve needs under governance and foundation discretion. Points also connect current user activity with future token distribution, with a fixed 10 million-point pool across three seasons and conversion expected at TGE.

Who AFX Is Really Built For

AFX makes the most sense for traders who care about execution control rather than simple leveraged exposure.

Advertisement
  • Active perp traders who want order book trading, fast order placement, and more control over entries, exits, and cancellations.
  • Market makers and high-volume traders who need low fees, API access, predictable sequencing, and enough technical transparency to monitor execution quality.
  • On-chain-native traders who prefer public settlement, visible order flow, and a trading stack that keeps more of the exchange process on-chain.
  • Automated strategy builders who want agent wallets, private WebSocket data, and permission controls for bots or AI-assisted trading systems.
  • Traders looking beyond crypto pairs who want perpetual exposure to stocks, indices, metals, and commodities inside a crypto-native venue.

AFX is less suitable for casual users, passive DeFi investors, or traders who only want a simple leverage product with minimal setup. It is also not the obvious first choice for users who prioritise the deepest existing liquidity, the longest operating history, or the broadest stress-tested track record. 

For those traders, Hyperliquid, dYdX, or GMX may still feel safer until AFX proves its liquidity, uptime, and liquidation design across more volatile market cycles.

The open issue is proof. AFX has early volume, a defined technical thesis, and a set of features aimed at active traders, but the strongest perp venues are judged over time. Liquidity depth, uptime during volatility, liquidation behavior, independent audits, and trader retention will matter more than launch metrics. 

The post AFX Enters the Perp DEX Race Hyperliquid Already Leads, How is It Different? appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin (BTC) price climbs to $63,000 as markets shrug off Iran airstrikes: Crypto Markets Today

Published

on

Bitcoin (BTC) price climbs to $63,000 as markets shrug off Iran airstrikes: Crypto Markets Today

The crypto market bounced back from a mid-week lull on Thursday, with bitcoin rising by 1.2% since midnight UTC to $63,000 while ether (ETH) advanced 0.75% to $1,755.

The move tracked U.S. stock market gains, as Nasdaq 100 index futures added 2.6% over the past 24 hours despite the escalation of tensions between the U.S. and Iran.

U.S. Central Command said it hit 90 military targets in the latest round of airstrikes, which took place 24 hours after President Donald Trump said the ceasefire was over.

Markets initially sold off at the time, but crypto remained resilient, rallying from oversold territory to extend a relatively hot streak since the turn of the month.

Advertisement

Bitcoin is now 9% higher than June’s monthly close and a selection of altcoins has continued to outperform with lighter (LIT) and ether.fi (ETHFI) surging by around 35% over the same period.

Derivatives positioning

  • The crypto futures market is taking a breather, with 24-hour volume dropping almost 20% at $191 billion and open interest (OI) steady near $106 billion.
  • Bitcoin’s overnight recovery to nearly $63,000 is accompanied by a decline in open interest in major dollar and USDT-denominated futures to 266K BTC from 272K BTC. These diverging trends shows investor reluctance to take leveraged bets in such a volatile macroeconomic environment. The same is true for ether, XRP and solana.
  • OI in Canton Network’s CC token futures increased for a third straight day, with the tally rising to 271 million tokens, the most since May 31. The token continues to slide and, as noted yesterday, the concurrent increase in futures OI points to an influx of short positions or bearish bets.
  • Activity in perpetual futures tracking the S&P 500 index is again picking up, with OI increasing to the highest since SpaceX debuted on Nasdaq nearly a month ago.
  • BTC and ETH’s 30-day implied volatility indexes are back under pressure, snapping a two-day winning streak in a sign of renewed supply of options and expectations for market calm.
  • On Deribit, BTC and ETH puts remain pricier than calls across all time frames, reflecting downside concerns. The sentiment on Wall Street is the polar opposite: The average skew in S&P 500 stock options shows a record bias for calls, or bullish bets.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Ethereum price holds $1,750 as Middle East tensions and $1,800 wall cap recovery

Published

on

Ethereum 4-hour chart showing repeated rejection below $1,850 resistance as ETH consolidates around $1,750 with MACD and RSI easing.

Ethereum price has remained pinned near $1,750 after renewed Middle East tensions triggered a risk-off mood across financial markets and sellers once again defended the $1,800 resistance zone.

Summary

  • Ethereum price remains stuck near $1,750 as Middle East tensions keep risk appetite subdued across crypto markets.
  • Repeated rejection at $1,800 and heavy liquidation clusters continue to block a sustained ETH breakout.
  • A break below $1,750 could expose $1,700, while reclaiming $1,800 may trigger a short squeeze toward $2,000.

According to data from crypto.news, Ethereum (ETH) price traded around $1,756 on Wednesday after failing to sustain multiple attempts above $1,800 during the past week. The latest rejection followed U.S. airstrikes on Iranian military targets after Iran reportedly fired on civilian shipping near the Strait of Hormuz, sending investors toward traditional safe-haven assets and limiting demand for cryptocurrencies.

The conflict also disrupted diplomatic efforts that had already paused during Iran’s official mourning period for Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Advertisement

At the same time, regulatory uncertainty in the U.S. has discouraged fresh institutional positioning. The Securities and Exchange Commission updated its 2026 rulemaking agenda on July 7 and July 8 with three cryptocurrency proposals covering safe harbors, broker-dealer capital requirements, and alternative trading systems.

While the framework offers more regulatory clarity than enforcement-led oversight, major investors continue to await the fate of the CLARITY Act before deploying additional capital into digital assets.

Ethereum remains trapped between strong support and heavy resistance

Ethereum’s price structure continues to compress inside a well-defined range. The 4-hour chart shows repeated failures near the $1,850 resistance area, while buyers have repeatedly defended support around $1,750. The latest rejection formed after ETH completed another rounded recovery pattern but stalled below horizontal resistance, extending a trading range that has dominated price action for several sessions.

Advertisement
Ethereum 4-hour chart showing repeated rejection below $1,850 resistance as ETH consolidates around $1,750 with MACD and RSI easing.
Ethereum 4-hour price chart — July 9 | Source: crypto.news

According to crypto analyst Daan Crypto Trades, “ETH Rejected at $1800 for the fourth time this last week. This resistance has held every single attempt so far… Below, this $1750 region remains key.” His chart identifies $1,750 as the lower boundary of the current range, with a decisive move beyond either level likely to determine Ethereum’s next directional trend.

Daily technical indicators present a mixed picture. Ethereum has reclaimed a descending trendline that capped prices since May and continues to trade above the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level near $1,703.

Ethereum daily chart showing a breakout above a descending trendline while testing resistance near $1,760 with Fibonacci levels, Aroon, and CMF indicators.
Ethereum daily price chart — July 9 | Source: crypto.news

Chaikin Money Flow remains positive at 0.08, suggesting capital continues to enter the market, while the Aroon Up reading remains dominant. Momentum, however, has slowed as the 4-hour MACD histogram turned negative and the RSI eased toward the neutral 50 level after briefly approaching overbought territory earlier this month.

Derivatives positioning also argues for continued volatility rather than an immediate breakout. CoinGlass liquidation data shows one of the largest short liquidation clusters sitting between roughly $1,770 and $1,780, with even larger concentrations extending toward the $1,800-$1,850 region. A sustained move through those levels could trigger cascading liquidations and accelerate upside momentum.

Ethereum liquidation heatmap highlighting dense short liquidation clusters between $1,770 and $1,850 and strong long liquidity near $1,700.
Ethereum liquidation heatmap | Source: CoinGlass

On the downside, notable long liquidation pools have developed around $1,720 and near the psychological $1,700 level, leaving both directions vulnerable to sharp moves if either boundary gives way.

Beyond price action, Ethereum continues to face structural headwinds inside its own ecosystem. Activity has increasingly migrated toward layer-2 networks and competing layer-1 blockchains, reducing activity on Ethereum’s mainnet. Lower transaction fees have weakened ETH’s burn rate while decentralized finance activity remains below previous cycle highs.

Even Vitalik Buterin’s newly released Lean Ethereum roadmap, which outlines upgrades for scalability, privacy and quantum resistance through 2029, has so far failed to generate a meaningful market response.

Advertisement

A break below $1,750 could reopen the path toward $1,700

The bullish case remains intact as long as Ethereum holds above its current support band. Commenting on the market, analyst Ted Pillows argued:

“ETH is still holding above the $1,750 level. As long as Ethereum stays above it, there’s a decent chance of a relief rally.”

His chart identifies the next upside objective near $2,000 if buyers reclaim momentum.

A close below $1,750 would weaken that outlook. Such a move could expose the $1,720 liquidity pocket before opening the door toward $1,700 and the nearby 200-day moving average around $1,694.

Additional geopolitical escalation, higher oil prices, delays to U.S. crypto legislation, or another wave of risk-off selling across global markets could strengthen bearish pressure and postpone Ethereum’s attempt to reclaim the $1,800-$1,850 resistance zone.

Advertisement

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

5 Key Reasons Bitcoin’s Price Remains Under Heavy Pressure

Published

on

Although it has rebounded by $5,000 since its July 1 low at under $58,000, bitcoin remains in a highly pressured market structure that has halted each major breakout attempt.

There are good reasons for that, of course, as multiple factors have aligned to keep it suppressed. Here are five of them.

Macro Landscape

The first reemerged yesterday when the US and Iran broke the ceasefire and initiated new attacks against each other in the Middle Eastern region. The actual threat came hours later when, during a NATO meeting, US President Donald Trump said he believes the memorandum of understanding between the two nations is over.

A new wave of attacks followed earlier this morning before Trump claimed, once again, that Iran wanted a peace deal ‘badly’ and had resumed contact. However, similar statements have been made multiple times in the past, but a deal is yet to be reached.

Advertisement

The second macro reason comes from the Federal Reserve, which continues to refuse to lower interest rates. Moreover, recent reports indicated that several Fed officials considered raising the rates in one of the next FOMC meetings. They justified this with the war’s fallout, as oil prices continue to rise and inflation is jumping in tandem. Similar moves tend to increase the pressure on risk-on assets, such as bitcoin and the altcoins.

Strategy, ETFs, and Coinbase

Aside from the aforementioned macro reasons, the tighter landscape around bitcoin is not flourishing either. Perhaps the most painful one comes from Michael Saylor’s Strategy. The company that has consistently accumulated BTC over the last five years and enhanced its purchases in late 2024 sold twice in the past couple of months. The last one, announced earlier this week, was even more worrisome as it was for over 3,500 units.

The ETFs are the fourth overall reason. They lost over $8 billion from the total cumulative flows in just two months. Some weekly numbers set anti-records with over $1.5 billion leaving in just five trading days. Although they managed to turn green in three out of the last four business days, the demand still lacks, and BTC would need a major trend reversal to change its trajectory.

The last key factor that we will discuss in this article is the Coinbase Bitcoin Premiums Index. The metric measures the difference between BTC on the largest US exchange and the global average. In general, if it’s positive, it means that the demand for the asset in the States is higher, and vice versa.

Advertisement

The reality shows that it hasn’t been positive for a very long time. Recent data provided by Wu Blockchain noted that the metric had been in a negative state for a record 50 consecutive days. The previous anti-record was again in 2026 and lasted for 40-days – from January 16 to February 24. Once it flipped, BTC went from $64,000 to $76,000 in about a month.

The post 5 Key Reasons Bitcoin’s Price Remains Under Heavy Pressure appeared first on CryptoPotato.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Everything Within Reach: Why It Pays to Have All Your Trading Tools in One Place

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Trading on the forex market isn’t just about reading charts and sensing where price is headed next. It’s also a steady stream of routine work — calculations, analysis, news monitoring, and technical checks. The more services and browser tabs a trader has to juggle at once, the higher the chance of a mistake and the slower the reaction to a sudden market move. That’s why one of the biggest factors behind comfortable, effective trading isn’t necessarily how clever a single indicator is — it’s how convenient the overall ecosystem is when every tool a trader needs lives in one place.

The problem with scattered tools

A beginner trader often discovers that fully preparing for a trade means checking a dozen different resources: one site for the economic calendar, another for calculating position size, a third for volatility analysis, and finally the actual trading platform to place the order. Switching between tabs eats up time, and on a fast-moving market every second can matter. On top of that, data pulled from different sources isn’t always in sync — quotes may differ slightly, spreads may be calculated differently, and formulas may rest on different assumptions.

Experienced traders know that the fewer “seams” there are between preparing a trade and executing it, the lower the risk of a technical error. When a broker offers a built-in set of analytical and calculation tools directly inside the trading terminal or on its website, this significantly simplifies the workflow and reduces cognitive load.

What a trader should have close at hand

A well-rounded toolkit integrated into a single ecosystem usually includes:

Advertisement
  • An economic calendar — so you can see important data releases in advance and avoid getting caught in a sharp price swing.
  • Technical and fundamental analysis from the broker’s analysts, useful as a starting point for your own conclusions.
  • A tool for calculating pip value, commonly known as a pip calculator, which quickly shows how much one pip of price movement is worth in your account currency for a given trade size.
  • A tool for sizing trades, or position size calculator, which lets you match your risk per trade to your account balance and stop-loss distance without manual math in a notebook or a third-party spreadsheet.
  • Historical and streaming quote data for backtesting strategies.
  • A personal account dashboard where you can quickly review trade history, commissions, and swap charges.

When all of these elements are gathered on a single platform, a trader spends less time on preparation and more time on actually analyzing the market and making sound decisions.

An example of the integrated approach: Dukascopy

A good illustration of this approach is the Swiss bank and broker Dukascopy. The company has spent years building out its own trading ecosystem, which includes not just trading platforms (such as its proprietary JForex) but also a broad set of supporting services: historical quotes for nearly every instrument, publicly available technical and fundamental reviews, an economic calendar, and a block of calculation tools that includes pip and margin calculators.

This kind of integrated setup means a trader never has to leave their familiar environment — all the data is consistent, quotes come from a single source, and calculations reflect the actual execution conditions of that specific broker rather than some averaged market parameters. For traders who are active across multiple instruments at once, this saves real time and cuts down on technical slip-ups.

How this affects trading results

Convenience isn’t just a matter of comfort — it’s a direct factor in risk management. When sizing a position takes a few seconds inside the platform’s interface instead of five minutes in a separate app, a trader is far more likely to actually run that calculation before every trade, rather than relying on gut feeling. The same goes for understanding pip value: knowing exactly how much a certain number of pips will cost helps set stop-loss and take-profit levels more precisely and avoid situations where the real risk on a trade ends up larger than planned.

On top of that, a unified ecosystem reduces the chance of simple but costly mistakes — using stale quotes from a third-party source, for instance, or miscalculating a cross-currency conversion. This matters especially for traders working several currency pairs at once or running intraday strategies with dozens of trades a day.

Advertisement

Conclusion

Forex trading demands not just analytical skill but organization. Having every necessary tool — from the economic calendar to calculators for position size and pip value — available in one place lets a trader focus on what actually matters: reading the market and making decisions, rather than getting bogged down in technical routine. Brokers like Dukascopy demonstrate that a genuinely integrated trading ecosystem can meaningfully improve a trader’s efficiency and discipline, and ultimately, the quality of their trading decisions.


Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

A DEX trader holds $1 million EUR/USD bullish bet for 400 Days

Published

on

Non-dollar stablecoins are struggling to crack 0.5% of market share

The term “HODLing,” crypto slang for buying and holding an asset for a long time, has historically been associated almost exclusively with bitcoin and ether (ETH).

One trader has now applied the same long-term approach to perpetual futures tied to the euro-dollar pair (EUR/USD) listed on the decentralized exchange (DEX) Ostium, which is powered by Nasdaq data.

A trader has held a long position in EUR/USD worth $1,139,490 for 400 days, Ostrium said on Tuesday. The bullish bet, expecting the euro to strengthen against the U.S. dollar, was opened around early June 2025. EUR/USD traded above 1.14 as of this writing, largely unchanged from where it was in June last year, but it did rise as high as 1.2082 in January this year.

Onchain FX trading offered by platforms such as Ostium, Gains Network, Synthetix, GMX, and others remains a very tiny fraction of the global traditional FX market, which sees daily trading volume exceeding $9 trillion.

Advertisement

Nevertheless, this single 400-day HODL on EUR/USD demonstrates that some traders are comfortable using blockchain rails and perpetual contracts to take leveraged positions on major traditional assets.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Binance Co-CEO Says Regulators Invited Exchange to Apply for New Licenses After MiCA Setback

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Binance co-CEO Richard Teng said the exchange is discussing with regulators in “premature” talks about applying for crypto licenses after it pulled back its MiCA application in Greece. Speaking at the Reuters NEXT Asia conference in Singapore on Thursday, Teng did not name the jurisdictions involved, adding that the dialogue is still at an early stage.

The comments come after Binance’s regulatory pivot inside the EU. MiCA—the European Union’s single, harmonized crypto licensing regime—became fully applicable after the bloc’s transition period ended on July 1. As a result, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) said crypto firms must serve EU clients through a MiCA-authorized entity, with limited exceptions for unsolicited cross-border business.

Key takeaways

  • Binance is in early discussions with regulators about obtaining crypto licenses, Teng said, without identifying the countries.
  • Binance withdrew its MiCA license application in Greece on June 24, citing concerns about how quickly EU users would face a shortened transition period.
  • Teng argued that EU users increasingly moved funds to self-custody rather than to MiCA-authorized platforms, questioning MiCA’s consumer-protection impact.
  • Competition among licensed exchanges has intensified following the transition end, according to statements citing app download growth.
  • Binance says it continues expanding in Asia through partnerships, including in the Philippines, while noting the regulatory landscape there is split between different agencies.

Binance seeks a new licensing path after Greece withdrawal

Binance’s Greek setback followed reports that Greek regulators intended to reject its MiCA licensing bid. According to earlier coverage by Cointelegraph, Binance withdrew its Greece MiCA application on June 24. Teng said at Reuters NEXT Asia that the situation took the company by surprise even though it submitted what it believed to be a fully compliant application.

“It caught us by surprise because we submitted a fully compliant application. The regulators told us as much,” Teng said, adding that the company was “not quite sure” why the approval process continued to be delayed. He said Binance withdrew the application to avoid a scenario where users would be forced into an extremely short transition window.

Separately, ESMA’s guidance after the MiCA transition ended emphasized that EU-facing services should route through a MiCA-authorized entity, with only narrow carve-outs for unsolicited cross-border activity. That framework is intended to bring crypto firms under a consistent EU rulebook, replacing a patchwork of national regimes.

Advertisement

Self-custody dominates outflows, Teng says

At the conference, Teng argued that the post-transition reality in Europe has not played out in the way MiCA’s consumer-protection goals might suggest. He pointed to user behavior after MiCA requirements took effect, saying that users who withdrew assets from Binance overwhelmingly chose self-custody.

According to Teng, “Of the users in the EU [who] have subsequently withdrawn their funds out of our platform, 70% of those funds went to self-hosted wallets. Only 30% flowed to MiCA-regulated entities.” Teng suggested that this outcome reduces the level of oversight available to consumers, since self-hosted wallets are not subject to the same licensing and operational constraints as regulated exchange platforms.

Cointelegraph also reported that Binance recorded net outflows of $1.23 billion during the week beginning June 29, which it noted was up 207% from roughly $400 million the prior week, referencing DefiLlama data reviewed by Cointelegraph.

The key tension in the exchange’s argument is straightforward: even if MiCA strengthens licensing standards for intermediaries, it may not reduce the volume of users holding assets in unhosted environments. That matters for investor protection because wallet custody shifts risk from licensed venues to end users, including risks around backups, access control, and security hygiene.

Advertisement

MiCA transition end reshapes competition among licensed exchanges

Another theme from Teng’s remarks was how quickly the competitive map can change once MiCA becomes enforceable. He referenced ongoing market dynamics inside the EU, while also highlighting that licensed exchanges are vying for the attention of users and liquidity that move once a major platform changes its regulatory stance.

OKX, for example, said its app downloads rose 158% between June 24 and July 5, citing Sensor Tower data. While download metrics do not directly translate into regulated trading volume, they can indicate faster user inflows during periods when compliance-driven changes affect how and where EU clients can access services.

For traders and allocators, this kind of shift can influence both execution quality and on-platform liquidity. But it also raises practical questions: whether users consolidate into a smaller set of MiCA-authorized venues, and how quickly those venues can absorb order flow compared with the speed at which users move out of non-compliant pathways.

Binance continues Asia expansion amid different regulators

Beyond Europe, Teng said Binance is working to expand its regulatory footprint across Asia. He cited deployments in multiple jurisdictions, naming Japan, Korea, Thailand, Indonesia, Australia, and announcing the Philippines as a recent addition.

Advertisement

Binance re-entered the Philippine market through a partnership with BlockShoals Technologies after regulators moved to restrict access to the exchange in 2024. The relationship, however, sits within a regulatory split: neither Binance nor BlockShoals is licensed by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas to handle peso transfers or other central bank-regulated virtual asset services.

Earlier reporting from Cointelegraph included an interview with BlockShoals’ head of legal, Marie Antonette Quiogue, who said the arrangement allows Binance to offer crypto trading because the trading activity is under the jurisdiction of the Philippine Securities and Exchange Commission. Services regulated by the central bank, she indicated, would require separate authorization.

That distinction underscores a recurring challenge for global exchanges: “one license” approaches can work poorly when oversight is divided across regulators with different scopes. It also means that compliance strategies often need to be tailored to the exact product—trading, custody, transfers, or other regulated functions—rather than treated as a single, uniform permission.

As Binance explores further licensing talks after its Greece withdrawal, investors and users will want to watch how the EU situation evolves: whether Binance can secure an authorization pathway for EU clients, whether more withdrawals keep flowing toward self-custody, and how quickly MiCA-licensed competitors can translate user interest into sustained liquidity.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto News, July 9: Iran Market Fears Fade as Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Shrug Off Another Panic

Published

on

btc logo

Fresh Iran headlines sent us scrambling last night, but the panic did not last. Markets, especially Bitcoin and Ethereum price, sold off after new geopolitical developments, only to reverse within hours once the narrative changed. Bitcoin price bounced sharply from the lows, while Ethereum held relatively steady, as many expected.

The first reaction was predictable as traders dumped crypto, oil jumped, and stocks went lower. For a moment, it looked like another geopolitical shock would drag the market into a deeper correction. Instead, buyers showed up almost immediately, refusing to let the bears gain momentum.

By this morning, the fear had mostly disappeared, with Bitcoin recovered most of its losses, and Ethereum barely lost its footing. It was another classic whipsaw that punished emotional trading more than anything else.

Advertisement

The latest Iran headlines looked scary enough to spark a classic risk-off move. Oil climbed, stocks weakened, and the Bitcoin price slipped as traders rushed to reduce exposure. The Ethereum price also moved lower but avoided the heavier selling that hit Bitcoin during the first wave.

Then the market did what it does best. It flipped. Reports that Iran was willing to return to negotiations erased much of the fear within hours. Bitcoin ripped higher, Ethereum stabilized, and anyone who panicked sold was suddenly chasing prices instead. Headlines may move markets, but they rarely stay in control for long.

Don’t Miss Out on Our $1,000 USDT Airdrop on ByBit

Bitcoin Price Refuses to Stay Down

Advertisement
Bitcoin (BTC)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Bitcoin price once again proved why betting against it after a headline-driven selloff is rarely an easy trade. Buyers defend support and erased most of the decline. In the end, bulls pushed the market back into familiar territory.

That recovery came despite spot Bitcoin ETFs recording $84 million in net outflows, ending a three-day buying streak. Normally, that would weigh on sentiment, yet Bitcoin ignored the script. It has built a habit of frustrating traders who expect every negative headline to become a lasting trend.

Fresh Iran news sent us scrambling last night, but the panic did not last. Bitcoin and Ethereum price reversed within hours. Why?
ETF Flow, Coinglass

Regulators also stayed busy as Europe continued reviewing crypto rules under MiCA, the United States pushed stablecoin legislation forward, and India’s central bank repeated its call for tighter restrictions. None of those developments mattered as much as the market’s ability to shrug off another wave of geopolitical fear.

Discover: The Best Token Presales

Ethereum Price Fights Bears

Advertisement

Ethereum is in a tight price range while the rest of the market bounced around. It did not match Bitcoin’s rebound, but it also avoided a meaningful breakdown. On a day dominated by uncertainty, it surprisingly stays steady.

However, the chart is still flashing warning signs. A weekly death cross has formed, convincing the bears after months of weakness. Momentum indicators remain soft, and another move lower cannot be ruled out if sellers regain control. Even so, experienced traders know those signals often appear near the end of a downtrend.

Ethereum (ETH)
24h7d30d1yAll time

Outside the charts, the crypto industry kept moving. AscendEX confirmed it is winding down operations, tokenized equities continued gaining traction, and lawmakers debated fresh crypto legislation. In the end, Bitcoin price erased most of its losses, the Ethereum price held key support, and the latest Iran drama faded almost as quickly as it appeared.

Discover: The Best Crypto to Diversify Your Portfolio

Advertisement

The post Crypto News, July 9: Iran Market Fears Fade as Bitcoin and Ethereum Price Shrug Off Another Panic appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

TRON (TRX) Maintains Critical Support Level While Network Accounts Exceed 392 Million

Published

on

Tron (TRX) Price

Key Highlights

  • The TRON blockchain has officially exceeded 392 million total wallet addresses
  • TRX currently trades at $0.3321 with a total market capitalization of $31.5 billion
  • Technical analysts identify $0.35 as the critical resistance zone for potential breakout
  • Tron Inc. acquired 151,322 additional TRX tokens, pushing treasury holdings past 704 million
  • Total Value Locked on TRON increased by $1.95 billion (7.8% gain) from July 1

TRON (TRX) continues demonstrating stable price action while the blockchain platform achieves significant network growth milestones and attracts sustained institutional accumulation.

Tron (TRX) Price
Tron (TRX) Price

Blockchain data from TRON’s official network explorer reveals the platform has successfully surpassed the 392 million total accounts threshold. This metric encompasses all wallet addresses ever generated on the blockchain network, distinguishing it from daily or monthly active user counts.

Since launching its independent mainnet in 2018, TRON has positioned itself as a leading infrastructure for stablecoin transactions and decentralized content distribution. According to DeFilLama analytics, USDT transfers on TRON dominate the stablecoin movement landscape across blockchain networks.

The platform’s infrastructure supports up to 2,000 transactions per second with remarkably low fees averaging approximately 0.0003 TRX per transaction. This combination of high throughput and minimal costs has drawn significant institutional adoption from industry giants such as Binance, HTX, and Tether.

Blockchain analytics platform Lookonchain documented that TRON’s Total Value Locked has expanded by $1.95 billion since the beginning of July, representing a 7.8% increase. This growth trajectory indicates accelerating on-chain activity throughout recent weeks.

At present, TRX is valued at $0.3321, reflecting a 1.13% gain over the past 24-hour period. The token recorded $492.43 million in trading volume during this timeframe, while maintaining its $31.5 billion market capitalization.

Advertisement

Critical Resistance Zone Under Scrutiny

Cryptocurrency technical analyst Umair Orakzai observed that TRX continues defending a crucial support zone, preserving its bullish technical structure. His analysis highlights $0.35 as the next significant resistance threshold requiring close monitoring.

Market technicians suggest that a decisive move above the $0.35 level would likely attract additional buying momentum and fuel further upward price movement. Conversely, a failed breakout attempt — characterized by a brief spike above resistance followed by rapid reversal — could unleash selling pressure.

Advertisement

According to technical analysis perspectives, TRX must either achieve a convincing breakthrough above $0.35 or maintain consolidation within its established trading range.

Institutional Accumulation Continues

Tron Inc. executed another strategic acquisition, purchasing 151,322 TRX tokens at an average entry price of $0.3304 per unit. This transaction elevates the organization’s cumulative TRX position beyond 704 million tokens.

The company announced its intention to continue expanding its Tron Digital Asset Treasury through ongoing accumulation. This persistent buying activity demonstrates sustained confidence and long-term strategic positioning in the native asset.

Advertisement

TRX DAO has also acknowledged the account growth achievement, connecting it to the network’s broader decentralization objectives.

Emerging regulatory frameworks in the European Union and United Arab Emirates are anticipated to influence TRON’s capacity to establish additional institutional collaborations moving forward.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SK Hynix and CXMT IPO boom could pull capital away from crypto

Published

on

SK Hynix and CXMT IPO boom could pull capital away from crypto

The U.S.-blocked company plans to use the proceeds to upgrade production lines and technology after posting explosive growth, including first-quarter revenue of 50.8 billion yuan, up 700% year-on-year. Reuters estimates CXMT held around 7.7% of the global DRAM market last year.

These deals follow SpaceX (SPCX) and Cerebras (CBRS), two AI-related listings that have fueled enthusiasm across semiconductor and memory stocks. Together they reinforce a broader theme: investors are allocating fresh capital to companies building the infrastructure behind artificial intelligence rather than to crypto assets.

Bitcoin has fallen roughly 50% from its October all-time high to around $63,000, as investors have increasingly favored AI infrastructure plays over digital assets.

The pipeline is far from empty.

Advertisement

OpenAI and Anthropic have both been discussed as companies that could eventually command valuations approaching $1 trillion.

While market expectations had pointed to IPOs as early as this year, however, growing investor unease over AI valuations and a cooling in semiconductor shares could delay those listings until 2027.

Even so, another wave of AI mega offerings would likely continue drawing liquidity away from crypto.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025