XRP has climbed more than 30% over the last three months, and fresh on-chain and market signals are fueling a cautiously constructive outlook for the XRP/USD pair. As institutional interest, token flows, and a key technical setup align, traders are watching whether the momentum can extend into late spring and early summer.

Analysts are dialing in on a confluence of factors: a notable outflow of XRP from exchanges, renewed large-holder accumulation signals, and a tilt in U.S. spot XRP ETF demand. Together, these elements paint a picture of a market shifting away from near-term selling pressure and toward a more sustained demand dynamic, even as the price hovers near a critical technical juncture.

Key takeaways

• Exchange outflows are signaling a shift of XRP into private wallets or custody, with nearly 35 million XRP leaving exchanges in the last 24 hours—the sixth-largest daily outflow of the year, according to Santiment.
• U.S. spot XRP ETFs have seen three consecutive weeks of net inflows, totaling about $82.88 million as of Saturday, lifting assets under management to roughly $1.1 billion, per SoSoValue data.
• Whale flows have turned positive, with CryptoQuant data showing the 90-day moving average moving back above zero, indicating accumulation by larger holders.
• Technically, XRP/USD sits inside a long-running falling wedge, with a potential 30% move higher by June if the price breaks toward the wedge’s upper boundary, targeting the 50-week EMA near $1.87–$1.89.

On-chain and custody signals bolster the bull case

Exchange outflows have historically accompanied rebounds in XRP price, and the latest spike of around 35 million XRP moving out of exchanges in a 24-hour window marks a notable moment in the current cycle. Santiment highlights that this is among the year’s larger daily outflows, suggesting a concentration of tokens in private wallets or custody rather than ready-for-sale stock on exchanges.

Looking back, similar outflow surges have preceded meaningful upside moves. In March, a pronounced exchange withdrawal spike preceded roughly a 20% price rebound, while February’s outflow surge foreshadowed a near 50% rally. Although past performance is not a guarantee of future results, the pattern adds weight to the view that lower sell-side availability could support higher prices if demand remains steady.

The current outflow narrative dovetails with other positive signals from the XRP ecosystem, offering a more data-driven rationale for optimism over the near term. As long as private wallets and custody arrangements continue to grow while on-exchange liquidity remains constrained, the downside pressure from day-to-day selling may subside, allowing other buyers to push the price higher on favorable momentum.

Institutional demand rises as XRP ETFs attract capital

Institutional interest appears to be crystallizing through benchmark XRP spot exchange-traded products in the United States. SoSoValue data shows three consecutive weeks of net inflows into XRP spot ETFs, with total inflows around $82.88 million through the most recent tally. This flow has helped push the aggregate assets under management for XRP ETFs to roughly $1.1 billion, a milestone that underscores growing institutional exposure to the token.

For traders and investors, ETF inflows can be a proxy for broader appetite among institutions and wealth managers. The persistence of inflows suggests a more constructive stance toward XRP-related products, especially when combined with the custody-driven on-chain dynamics mentioned above. While the ETF channel is just one of several data points, it reinforces the case that demand for XRP products remains more robust than it did earlier in the year.

Whale activity confirms persistent accumulation

Beyond exchange outflows and ETF demand, large-holder behavior is flashing a positive signal. CryptoQuant data indicate that XRP whale flows have flipped to a net-positive regime, with the 90-day moving average rising above zero after spending most of early 2026 in negative territory. Historically, positive whale-flow environments have preceded notable price upswings, lending additional credibility to the current bulge of accumulation by bigger holders.

In the context of the broader accumulation narrative, the shift in whale behavior aligns with the exchange outflows and ETF inflows. When whales accumulate and tokens move into non-exchange custody, the supply-side pressure from sell orders tends to ease, while demand-side pressure from institutions and retail buyers looking to participate in a potential breakout can sustain upside momentum.

Technical setup signals a potential 30% lift, with clear risks

From a chart perspective, XRP/USD has spent a lengthy period trapped inside a falling wedge—two converging downward-sloping lines that have defined the asset’s path for nearly two years. Recent price action has rebounded off the wedge’s lower boundary, setting the stage for a test of the upper boundary. If the pair can clear resistance near the wedge’s apex, the technical picture points toward a measured upside objective near the 50-week exponential moving average, around $1.87 to $1.89. That zone also coincides with the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement level, positioning the move roughly 30% above current prices by June, according to the prevailing technical framework drawn from weekly charts.

On the flip side, a decisive break below the lower trend line would undermine the bullish setup. A break that closes below the wedge could open the door to a revisit of support near the apex point, with a potential retreat toward the $0.98 level—the wedge apex coinciding with the 0.786 Fibonacci retracement.

For traders, the key takeaway is that the current arrangement requires confirmation. The convergence of on-chain outflows, ETF inflows, and positive whale activity lowers the risk of a sudden, sharp pullback, but the technical pattern will remain invalidated unless XRP breaks decisively above the wedge’s resistance. If the price sustains a move into the upper boundary and beyond, the upside path becomes clearer, but any erosion of the momentum or a return of selling pressure could shift the risk-reward balance toward the downside.

What readers should watch next

As May unfolds, the market will be testing whether the confluence of outflows, custody trends, ETF inflows, and whale accumulation translates into a durable uptrend for XRP. Investors should watch two interlinked developments: whether exchange outflows maintain their tempo, signaling ongoing token migration away from tradable liquidity, and whether ETF inflows sustain their momentum, indicating continued institutional appetite for XRP exposure. Additionally, the price action around the wedge’s resistance will be a critical signal for the near-term trajectory. If XRP can establish a breakout above the upper boundary with convincing volume, the medium-term case for a roughly 30% rise by mid-year strengthens. If not, a revisit to the wedge’s lower bound or apex could introduce renewed caution for bulls.

BNB Chain has officially become the leading blockchain network for autonomous AI agents, with more than 150,000 on-chain deployments as of April 20, a 43,750% increase from the fewer than 400 agents that existed across all blockchains at the start of 2026, with one in every three AI agents currently operating on any blockchain now running on BNB Chain.

BNB Chain confirmed on its official blog on April 20 that it has become the number one blockchain network for autonomous AI agents, with over 150,000 on-chain deployments recorded. In January 2026, fewer than 400 AI agents existed across all of blockchain. The 43,750% growth in under four months represents one of the fastest adoption curves for any single category in the history of on-chain development.

BNB Chain AI Agents Surge to 150,000 Deployments in Four Months

The growth is directly tied to BNB Chain’s adoption of two agent identity standards. The ERC-8004 standard, launched by the Ethereum Foundation, defines how AI agents register on-chain identities, manage wallets, and interact with smart contracts autonomously. BNB Chain then extended this with its proprietary BAP-578 standard, which goes further by enabling agents that are ownable, tradable, and upgradeable, capable of autonomous execution across multiple protocols simultaneously. Third-party data from 8004scan, which tracks on-chain agent activity, confirms that BNB Chain’s agent infrastructure is generating measurable economic activity. At peak, daily transaction volume tied to ERC-8004 agents on BNB Smart Chain reached approximately 523,000 transactions in a single day, with agent-driven DEX trading volume hitting over $18 million on the same day. As crypto.news reported, BNB Chain’s 2026 technical roadmap targets 20,000 transactions per second with sub-second finality, a throughput target specifically designed to support the kind of continuous, high-frequency execution patterns that AI agents generate.

What AI Agents Are Actually Doing on BNB Chain

The 150,000 agents operating on BNB Chain are not passive wallet addresses. Developers are deploying them to run DeFi strategies continuously, deploy tokens natively on BNB Smart Chain, power NFT ecosystems, manage customer-facing applications, and coordinate across chains around the clock without requiring human oversight between transactions. The critical infrastructure requirement for agents, unlike standard DeFi users, is that they execute constantly across multiple protocols on tasks that would take a human hours to manage manually. That demands low-cost, high-throughput infrastructure with reliable composability. BNB Chain’s sub-cent transaction fees and native cross-chain coordination tools have made it structurally attractive for agent developers who need infrastructure that can keep pace with continuous autonomous execution. As crypto.news documented, Binance itself has been building AI agent infrastructure at the exchange level, rolling out seven AI Agent Skills in March 2026 to connect spot trading, wallet data, and execution tools into a unified interface that automated systems can operate without manual intervention.

What the AI Agent Surge Means for BNB and the Broader Ecosystem

The emergence of BNB Chain as the dominant AI agent network adds a new demand narrative to BNB’s utility case that extends beyond its established role as a gas and fee token for retail DeFi. Agents that manage wallets, execute trades, and coordinate cross-chain positions generate sustained, programmable transaction demand rather than the episodic volume driven by human trading activity. As crypto.news tracked, Binance subsequently added four more AI Agent Skills in March covering USD-margined futures, margin trading, Alpha market data, and asset management, wiring automated strategies further into its infrastructure stack and reinforcing the ecosystem’s positioning as an AI-native execution venue. BNB was trading at approximately $583 on April 23, roughly 57% below its October 2025 all-time high of $1,375, with the AI agent narrative now being watched closely by analysts as a potential structural catalyst for the network’s next growth phase.

BNB Chain said it will continue expanding agent infrastructure, with further BAP-578 standard development and new developer tooling designed to support the next wave of autonomous on-chain applications expected later in 2026.

Not everything in bitcoin is at risk from a quantum computer.

Bitcoin mining, the process by which new blocks get added to the blockchain, uses a type of math called hashing that quantum computers cannot meaningfully break. The ledger itself and the rule that new bitcoin can only be created through mining would survive a quantum attacker. Blocks would still get produced, and the chain would keep running.

What would not survive is ownership.

Bitcoin wallets are protected by a different kind of math that turns a secret private key into a public address anyone can see. The math works easily in one direction and not at all in the other, which is the only thing stopping a stranger from spending your coins.

Part 1 of this quantum computing series went into physics. A quantum computer is not a faster version of a regular computer. It is a fundamentally different kind of machine, starting at a very cold, very small loop of metal where particles behave in ways they do not behave anywhere else on Earth.

Part 2 walked through what happens when you point that machine at bitcoin. Bitcoin wallets depend on a one-way math problem. Turning a secret private key into a public address takes milliseconds. Going the other way, from public address back to the private key, would take a regular computer longer than the age of the universe.

A quantum algorithm called Shor’s collapses the gap. Google’s paper this month showed the attack could be run with far fewer resources than anyone previously estimated, in a window that races against bitcoin’s own block times.

This piece, the last in the series, is about the response. What is actually at risk, what bitcoin has done about it, and whether a network built to resist coordinated change can coordinate the biggest security upgrade in its history before the hardware catches up.

What’s exposed, what’s safe

The at-risk pool is large.

Roughly 6.9 million bitcoin, about one-third of everything ever mined, sits in wallets whose public keys are already permanently visible onchain. Most of this is early bitcoin from the network’s first years, stored in an address format that published the public key by default. It also includes any wallet that has ever been spent from, because spending reveals the key for whatever remains.

A quantum attacker would not need to race against a transaction in progress. Rather, they could work through the wallets with already exposed keys at their own pace, one by one. Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, holds roughly 1 million bitcoin, untouched since the network’s early days, and this stack now sits in the exposed category.

The 2021 Taproot upgrade expanded the problem. Taproot is a change to how bitcoin addresses work, intended to make transactions more efficient and more private.

A side effect was that any bitcoin spent since Taproot activated has published the key protecting whatever remains at that address. This was not a mistake but a reasonable tradeoff at the time, when quantum timelines looked much longer than they do now.

What’s in the works?

While the quantum threat has sparked a heated debate in recent months, and other blockchains are preparing, nothing concrete has emerged from Bitcoin developers yet.

Ethereum, which can be considered one of Bitcoin’s largest competitors among institutional investors looking at the crypto market, has had a formal quantum-resistant program since 2018.

The Ethereum Foundation runs four teams working on the migration full-time, with more than ten independent developer groups shipping weekly test networks. The plan maps specific upgrades across four upcoming network-wide changes, moving Ethereum’s security to new math that quantum computers cannot break. It has even launched a dedicated website, pq.ethereum.org, to publish its progress.

Bitcoin has no equivalent strategy so far.

That doesn’t mean there aren’t any efforts out there to solve it.

One such formal proposal is BIP-360 from a group of developers and researchers. It would add new quantum-safe address types that holders could voluntarily migrate to. A competing proposal from BitMEX Research would install a detection system that triggers defensive action if a quantum attack is observed on the network.

However, neither has broad support from bitcoin’s core developers, and the two proposals solve different halves of the problem.

Nic Carter, one of bitcoin’s prominent advocates, has called it out in the past months.

“Elliptic curve cryptography is on the brink of obsolescence,” Carter wrote on X, referring to the math that secures bitcoin wallets. He described Ethereum’s approach as “best in class” and bitcoin’s as “worst in class,” citing developers who “deny, gaslight, gatekeep, bury heads in sand” rather than engage with the problem.

Adam Back, the Blockstream CEO and a prominent early bitcoin contributor, disagrees on the urgency but agrees on the direction.

“Quantum computing still has a lot to prove. Current systems are essentially lab experiments,” Back said at a conference earlier this month. But he also said bitcoin should prepare now, with optional upgrades built in advance so the network can migrate when needed, rather than scrambling in a crisis.

The coordination problem

So what’s the biggest challenge in implementing effective solutions against Bitcoin’s quantum threat?

Bitcoin’s migration is harder than Ethereum’s for reasons unrelated to the actual math.

Ethereum has a foundation that funds engineering work and a governance process that regularly passes major upgrades. Bitcoin has neither. Its development culture treats any central authority as a failure mode, and its social consensus holds that changes to the protocol should be rare and hard.

Those priors have kept the network stable for nearly two decades, but they also make the quantum problem structurally harder for bitcoin to solve.

Migrating the 6.9 million exposed coins requires decisions the network has spent twenty years avoiding. Should old address formats be frozen after a certain date to protect coins from future theft? Should exposed coins be allowed to move to new quantum-safe addresses using their original keys? What happens to coins whose owners cannot or will not migrate?

Satoshi’s coins are the sharpest example. Freezing old formats protects the coins from theft but makes them permanently inaccessible, including to Satoshi. Leaving the old formats open means those coins sit as a standing prize for whoever builds the first working quantum computer or has access to a quantum computer and wants to attack.

Setting a migration deadline forces Satoshi to either move the coins, revealing their ownership, or lose them. Every option changes bitcoin’s character in ways the network has historically refused to change it.

What happens next

The Google paper’s own framing is a summary of where the industry stands.

A successful attack on the math bitcoin uses “should not be seen as a wake-up call to adopt post-quantum cryptography as much as a potential signal that PQC adoption has already failed.”

This means that by the time the threat becomes visible, the window to respond may already have closed.

Developers now face a question of whether a network built to resist coordinated change can coordinate the biggest security upgrade in its history before the hardware catches up to the theory.

Ethereum’s eight-year head start suggests the correct answer is to start now. Bitcoin’s governance culture suggests the likely answer is to wait until the threat is demonstrated, then move.

Only one of those answers works if the timeline turns out to be shorter than the optimists’ estimate.

Morgan Stanley Investment Management launched the Stablecoin Reserves Portfolio on April 23, a government money market fund exclusively designed to hold the cash reserves backing stablecoin issuers’ outstanding tokens, positioning the Wall Street giant to capture reserve management business ahead of the GENIUS Act’s expected passage.

Morgan Stanley Investment Management filed the Stablecoin Reserves Portfolio with the SEC under its Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds trust on April 16, with the fund going live on April 23. The vehicle, trading under ticker MSNXX, is a government money market fund designed to let stablecoin issuers hold the reserves backing their outstanding tokens in a regulated, GENIUS Act-aligned structure.

Morgan Stanley Stablecoin Reserve Fund Targets the Compliance Infrastructure Market

As crypto.news reported, the fund invests only in cash, short-dated US Treasury bills and notes with maturities of 93 days or less, and overnight repurchase agreements collateralized by Treasuries, targeting capital preservation and daily liquidity at a stable $1.00 net asset value. The minimum investment is $10 million and the management fee is 0.15%, with a net expense ratio of 0.20% after fee waivers. While the fund is designed with stablecoin issuers as the primary audience, Morgan Stanley confirmed it is available to other institutional investors as well. Fred McMullen, co-head of Global Liquidity at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, described the launch as a timely response to marketplace demands. “We are pleased to deliver a new investment solution to the marketplace that seeks to address the specific investment needs of payment stablecoin issuers,” McMullen said. The GENIUS Act, currently advancing through Congress, requires stablecoin issuers to hold high-quality liquid assets on a 1:1 basis against all outstanding tokens, making a product like MSNXX a direct compliance vehicle rather than a speculative investment.

Why the Timing Is Strategically Significant for Morgan Stanley

The stablecoin reserve fund launch arrives less than three weeks after Morgan Stanley launched MSBT, the first spot Bitcoin ETF issued directly by a major US bank. As crypto.news documented, MSBT crossed $103 million in net inflows within eight days of its April 8 debut, overtaking the WisdomTree Bitcoin Fund and positioning Morgan Stanley as one of the most aggressively expanding institutional digital asset platforms on Wall Street. The stablecoin fund extends that strategy into a different layer of the digital asset ecosystem, moving from Bitcoin exposure products into the foundational infrastructure that stablecoin issuers need to comply with federal reserve requirements. The total stablecoin market cap was approximately $230 billion as of April 2026, meaning that the reserve management opportunity Morgan Stanley is positioning for runs into the hundreds of billions of dollars if the GENIUS Act passes and all major issuers are required to hold qualifying liquid assets.

What the GENIUS Act Compliance Angle Means for the Broader Market

The GENIUS Act, which has already passed the US Senate and is being reconciled with the House version, requires stablecoin issuers to hold 1:1 reserves in cash, Treasury bills, or other qualifying liquid assets at regulated institutions. As crypto.news tracked, Morgan Stanley has been systematically building its digital asset infrastructure across multiple product categories simultaneously, with ETF filings for Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana already submitted and retail crypto trading on E*Trade targeted for the first half of 2026. The stablecoin reserve fund adds a B2B infrastructure layer to what has been primarily a B2C product expansion, giving Morgan Stanley a position in both the retail-facing and issuer-facing sides of the regulated digital asset market.

As of late April 2026, the fund held approximately $1 million in assets, consistent with its early-stage status, reflecting that the broader stablecoin reserve management opportunity will materialise as GENIUS Act compliance requirements take effect.

XRP (XRP) has rallied more than 30% in the last three months, and fresh technical and on-chain signals suggest the XRP/USD pair may have more upside ahead.

XRP/USD daily chart. Source: TradingView

Key takeaways:

• Exchange outflows, positive whale flows and strong ETF demand raise XRP’s bullish outlook.
• A wedge setup sees the price rising roughly 30% by June.

Nearly 35 million XRP in exchange outflows boost upside case

As of Saturday, XRP Ledger (XRPL) had recorded nearly 35 million XRP in exchange outflows in the last 24 hours, logging its sixth-largest daily outflow of the year, according to Santiment.

Large exchange outflows typically suggest investors are moving tokens into private wallets or custody, reducing the amount of XRP immediately available for sale. Earlier this year, these spikes preceded modest rallies in the XRP price.

XRP Ledger exchange outflows versus XRP price. Source: Santiment

In March, a similar spike in exchange outflows preceded a roughly 20% rebound in XRP. February’s outflow surge was followed by an even stronger move, with XRP rising about 48&–50%.

Those precedents strengthen the view that the latest withdrawal spike may lead to higher XRP prices in May.

Also, US-based spot XRP ETFs have witnessed three consecutive weeks of net inflows, totaling about $82.88 million as of Saturday, according to SoSoValue data. The streak pushed the total assets under management to $1.1 billion.

XRP ETF weekly net flows. Source: SoSoValue

This indicates an increased institutional appetite for XRP products.

Positive whale flows reinforce upside sentiment

XRP whale flows have also flipped positive, according to CryptoQuant data, suggesting larger wallets are now accumulating rather than distributing.

The 90-day moving average of XRPL whale flows has moved back above zero after spending much of early 2026 in negative territory.

XRP whale flow 30DMA. Source: CryptoQuant

Historically, positive whale-flow regimes have preceded stronger XRP price trends, including the May–July 2025 rally.

The shift supports the broader accumulation narrative already visible in exchange outflows and ETF inflows.

XRP wedge setup hints at 30% rally next

XRP’s technical structure supports the upside case.

The XRP/USD pair has spent the past two years inside a falling wedge, defined by two downward-sloping, converging trend lines. Its April rebound from the lower trend line support now raises the odds of a move toward the upper boundary.

XRP/USD weekly chart. Source: TradingView

That target zone aligns with the 50-week EMA and the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement near $1.87–$1.89, about 30% above current levels, by June.

Related: XRP holders back in profit as price eyes potential 55% breakout

Conversely, a decisive break below the wedge’s lower trend line risks invalidating the bullish narrative altogether.

It may instead raise the odds of the price declining toward the $0.98 mark, aligning with the wedge’s apex point and the 0.786 Fib line.

A coalition of more than 120 crypto organizations led by the Crypto Council for Innovation and the Blockchain Association sent a joint letter to the Senate Banking Committee on April 23 demanding an immediate markup of the CLARITY Act, warning that further delay risks pushing investment, jobs, and technological development offshore while ceding global regulatory standard-setting to other jurisdictions.

The Blockchain Association posted on X that it and the Crypto Council for Innovation, joined by a broad coalition of more than 120 organizations, had urged the Senate Banking Committee to move forward with a markup on market structure legislation. The letter, addressed to Committee Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, along with Subcommittee Chair Cynthia Lummis and Ranking Member Ruben Gallego, calls on lawmakers to “notice and proceed towards a markup” of the CLARITY Act without further delay.

CLARITY Act Senate Markup Demand Signals Industry Ultimatum

As Bitcoin Magazine reported, the coalition includes Coinbase, Circle, Kraken, Ripple, Uniswap Labs, Andreessen Horowitz, Chainlink Labs, Chainalysis, OKX, Paradigm, and Galaxy Digital, alongside advocacy groups, state blockchain associations, and university chapters of Stand With Crypto. The letter lists six legislative priorities: drawing a clear SEC and CFTC oversight boundary, protecting non-custodial software developers from broker registration requirements, upholding consumer stablecoin rewards tied to activity rather than passive holdings, simplifying digital asset disclosure rules, preventing a patchwork of state-by-state regulation from filling the federal vacuum, and establishing a predictable baseline that keeps capital and innovation onshore. As crypto.news reported, Senator Bernie Moreno dismissed bank opposition to stablecoin rewards as “a lot of noise in the system” at a Washington event on April 22, and said he expects legislation to be completed by the end of May. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has separately called the bill a national security priority, warning that every month of delay pushes digital asset innovation toward hubs like Dubai and Singapore.

The Legislative Clock Is Now the Bill’s Biggest Enemy

The CLARITY Act passed the House 294 to 134 in July 2025 and cleared the Senate Agriculture Committee in January 2026. Despite that progress, the Senate Banking Committee has not scheduled a markup. As crypto.news documented, Congress breaks for Memorial Day recess on May 21, leaving fewer than four weeks of operational legislative time. Even after a successful markup, the bill must clear a 60-vote Senate floor threshold, be reconciled between the Banking and Agriculture Committee versions, reconciled with the House text, and signed by the president. Polymarket currently prices the bill’s 2026 passage odds at below 50%, a sharp decline from the 80% high it reached when the White House signalled imminent progress in early April. Galaxy Research has assessed odds at roughly 50-50 or lower, warning that the sheer number of unresolved questions under severe time pressure makes the path narrower than most in Washington have publicly acknowledged.

Why This Moment Is Different From Prior Industry Pushes

The April 23 letter represents a level of industry coordination the CLARITY Act has not previously seen, with more than 120 organizations signing a unified document rather than issuing separate statements. As crypto.news tracked, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong reversed his company’s January opposition and publicly backed the current bill version in April, a shift that removed one of the most high-profile sources of internal industry friction. As crypto.news noted, the remaining obstacle is not within the crypto industry but between the industry and banking trade groups that continue to lobby individual senators to reopen stablecoin yield provisions already negotiated and agreed upon. The Senate Banking Committee has not announced a markup date as of publication.

“Congress must move quickly to establish a predictable federal baseline,” the coalition letter stated, adding that the US risks returning to regulation-by-enforcement if market structure legislation fails to advance in the current window.

TLDR:

• North Carolina blockchain group urges Clarity Act markup amid stablecoin yield policy debate shift now
• GENIUS Act oversight reshapes stablecoin rules as banks warn on yield bearing products concerns rise
• Charlotte banking hub pushes digital asset adoption under Clarity Act competitiveness debate shift now
• Clarity Act momentum builds as lawmakers weigh stablecoin regulation and offshore capital risk shift now

---

A North Carolina blockchain and AI initiative has urged Senator Thom Tillis to advance the Clarity Act to markup. The move comes amid pushback from state bankers over yield-bearing stablecoin products and rewards. 

Supporters argue the GENIUS Act already placed stablecoin issuers under federal oversight, addressing shadow banking risks. They warn that restricting yield could push capital offshore, while Charlotte’s banking sector seeks digital asset leadership.

Clarity Act Push in North Carolina Stablecoin Debate

The North Carolina Blockchain and AI Initiative sent a formal letter urging Senator Thom Tillis to move the Clarity Act to committee markup. 

The group highlighted North Carolina’s role in digital asset innovation and called for faster legislative progress under Senate Banking leadership. The group linked this push to maintaining U.S. leadership in fintech innovation.

Recent concerns from the North Carolina Bankers Association focused on yield-bearing stablecoin products and reward structures. 

The association warned these mechanisms could introduce financial risk if left lightly regulated under emerging crypto frameworks. They reiterated caution on integrating crypto yields into traditional banking models. 

Banking groups said they prefer clearer restrictions on reward-based stablecoin models.

Supporters of the Clarity Act argued that the GENIUS Act already addressed shadow banking concerns. They said stablecoin issuers now operate under federal oversight with defined capital and compliance requirements. They also pointed to risks of fragmented regulation across state and federal levels.

Backers of the bill said additional provisions would regulate intermediaries in digital asset markets more clearly. They argued this structure reduces ambiguity for banks entering tokenized finance systems. 

Proponents said clarity could strengthen institutional participation in crypto infrastructure.

GENIUS Act Oversight and Charlotte Banking Competitiveness

The letter emphasized Charlotte’s position as the second-largest banking hub in the United States. It argued banks must adopt digital asset settlement tools to maintain global competitiveness. 

Lawmakers in North Carolina continue to explore GENIUS-compliant stablecoin frameworks at state level. It also highlighted access to talent from the Research Triangle region.

The group warned that banning yield-bearing stablecoins could push capital toward offshore markets. They said such a shift may replicate risks regulators aim to reduce domestically. Officials said liquidity migration remains a key policy concern in stablecoin debates.

The Clarity Act reportedly outlines new powers for banks engaging in digital asset services. 

Supporters said this would allow financial institutions to compete directly in tokenized markets. They added delayed legislation could slow adoption while activity shifts to global jurisdictions.

The initiative urged Senator Tillis and Senate Banking leadership to advance the bill quickly. They framed markup as necessary to align innovation with regulatory clarity in financial markets. 

Stakeholders said timely action could prevent regulatory fragmentation in digital finance.

President Trump delivered a keynote address on April 25 at a Mar-a-Lago gala restricted to the top 297 holders of his Official TRUMP memecoin, with a private VIP reception and champagne toast reserved for the top 29, as Senators Elizabeth Warren, Adam Schiff, and Richard Blumenthal formally called the event an improper sale of presidential access.

The White House confirmed that Trump would deliver a keynote at the TRUMP memecoin gala on April 25, held at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, settling earlier questions over whether the event was on his schedule given that the White House Correspondents’ Dinner was also taking place the same evening in Washington. Organizers said Trump would attend both events, traveling back to Washington after the Mar-a-Lago luncheon.

TRUMP Memecoin Mar-a-Lago Gala Draws Formal Senate Scrutiny

Access to the event was limited to the top 297 holders of the Official TRUMP token, ranked by time-weighted holdings over a 30-day window between March 12 and April 10. An inner circle of the top 29 holders received a VIP reception and champagne toast with the president, subject to background checks. As crypto.news reported, blockchain data showed large holders accelerating accumulation in the weeks before the event, with one investor moving over 105,000 tokens off Binance to bring total holdings to approximately 1.13 million TRUMP tokens worth roughly $3.2 million. The top 10 wallet addresses control 91% of the total TRUMP token supply. A Bloomberg analysis previously found that 19 of the top 25 memecoin holders are likely foreign nationals, adding a potential foreign influence dimension to the Senate’s scrutiny. Senators Warren, Schiff, and Blumenthal sent a formal letter to Fight LLC, one of the organizers behind the token, demanding documents related to event planning, attendee vetting, and the financial arrangements behind the gala. “Congress must also take steps to prohibit and prevent these egregious conflicts of interest,” the senators wrote.

The Financial Math Behind the Senate’s Concern

The Trump family and its affiliated entities have earned more than $320 million in transaction fees from the TRUMP memecoin since its January 2025 launch. As crypto.news documented, the senators’ letter to Fight LLC framed the event as a pay-to-play structure in which purchasing more of the president’s memecoin increases the probability of gaining direct face time with him, a dynamic the senators argued creates a direct financial incentive for Trump to promote and sustain the token’s trading activity. The senators noted that the token announcement in March caused the price to spike nearly 50%, generating immediate transaction fee income for affiliated entities at a time when Trump is simultaneously overseeing crypto regulation and appointing the industry’s regulators. As crypto.news tracked, whales accumulated heavily heading into the event despite TRUMP trading approximately 33% below its $4.35 March peak and 94% below its all-time high of $75.35 from January 2025.

How the Gala Affects the CLARITY Act Timeline

The timing of the gala carries direct implications for the CLARITY Act’s Senate path. Democratic senators have consistently held that ethics language preventing government officials and their families from profiting from crypto is a non-negotiable condition for their support of the bill. As crypto.news noted, the White House has said it will not accept any CLARITY Act language that targets the president individually, a position that has created the defining political deadlock in negotiations since January. The April 25 gala landing in the same week as the targeted Senate Banking Committee markup placed both sides directly back at that unresolved impasse, adding fresh pressure to a bill that Galaxy Research already rates at 50-50 odds of becoming law in 2026.

Event disclosures stated that Trump’s attendance was not guaranteed and that eligible token holders could receive a limited-edition TRUMP NFT if the event was canceled or the president was unable to attend.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced on April 24 that the US government has sanctioned multiple crypto wallets linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps under a campaign called Operation Economic Fury, with Tether executing the freeze of $344 million in USDT across two addresses on the Tron blockchain at the direction of American authorities.

The US Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control sanctioned multiple crypto wallet addresses linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on April 24, with Tether executing the freeze of $344 million in USDT across two Tron blockchain addresses in coordination with American law enforcement. “We will follow the money that Tehran is desperately attempting to move outside of the country and target all financial lifelines tied to the regime,” Bessent said in a statement announcing the action.

Operation Economic Fury Iran Crypto Freeze Targets IRGC Financial Architecture

The two frozen Tron wallets held approximately $213 million and $131 million in USDT respectively. Both were blacklisted at the USDT smart contract level rather than at the blockchain layer, meaning Tron itself continued operating normally while Tether’s issuer-level controls rendered the funds immovable. Chainalysis told CNN the wallets’ transaction patterns are “consistent with how we’ve observed other known IRGC wallets move funds on chain,” describing frequent large transfers of up to tens of millions of dollars predominantly between private wallets. A US official said investigators had identified material links to the Iranian regime, including transactions with Iranian exchanges and intermediary addresses that interacted with wallets associated with the Central Bank of Iran. As crypto.news reported, Chainalysis estimates Iran’s crypto ecosystem reached approximately $7.8 billion in 2025, with IRGC-linked activity accounting for roughly half of all on-chain holdings by the fourth quarter of that year.

Tether as a Sanctions Enforcement Tool

Thursday’s action was not the first time Tether’s freeze capability has been deployed as a Treasury enforcement mechanism, but at $344 million it is the largest single crypto freeze directly linked to Iran since the current conflict began. As crypto.news documented, Tether has increasingly aligned its wallet freezing policy with OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals list, blocking addresses connected to sanctioned individuals, terrorism financing, and high-risk jurisdictions across a growing number of enforcement actions. The freeze also follows January’s OFAC designations of two UK-registered crypto exchanges, Zedcex and Zedxion, for processing IRGC transactions, which crypto.news tracked as Britain subsequently moved to dissolve Zedxion after TRM Labs found IRGC-linked flows had reached 87% of the platform’s total transaction volume by 2024. The dual approach, sanctioning infrastructure and freezing assets simultaneously, reflects Treasury’s attempt to dismantle the layered architecture Iran has built to move money through digital rails while avoiding traditional banking.

What the Freeze Means for Iran’s Crypto Strategy

Daniel Tannebaum, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, told CNN the freeze is meaningful but said that given how sanctioned Iran already is, it does not necessarily move the needle on Tehran’s ability to operate during the conflict. As crypto.news noted, Iran has embedded cryptocurrency into its financial architecture at the state level, legalizing Bitcoin mining in 2019, accepting stablecoin payments for military export contracts since January 2026, and running a formal Strait of Hormuz toll system that operates in practice through stablecoins and yuan to bypass OFAC enforcement. The $344 million freeze removes a significant portion of visible on-chain holdings, but Tannebaum warned that the more effective approach to limiting Iran’s financial reach at this stage is targeting third-country actors enabling Tehran rather than the wallets themselves.

Tether said it executed the freeze in full coordination with OFAC and law enforcement, and reiterated its policy of blocking payments used to evade sanctions.

US spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have extended their inflow momentum through late April, notching a nine-day streak amid growing investor conviction.

During the period, which spanned April 14 and April 24, total net inflows reached roughly $2.12 billion, with the strongest single-day performance on April 17, when funds attracted $663.91 million. April 14 and April 22 also posted robust gains of $411.50 million and $335.82 million, respectively.

The weakest day came on Friday, with a more modest $14.45 million in net inflows. BlackRock’s IBIT led the day with $22.88 million in inflows. In contrast, Fidelity’s FBTC recorded outflows of $1.69 million, while Bitwise’s BITB and ARK 21Shares’ ARKB saw withdrawals of $8.85 million and $9.02 million, respectively. Other funds, including Grayscale’s GBTC and smaller products, reported largely flat flows.

The April streak is the first nine-day run for spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETFs since a similar run in October, when inflows surged, including $1.21 billion on Oct. 6 and $875.6 million on Oct. 7.

Spot Bitcoin ETFs see 9-day inflow streak. Source: SoSoValue

The sustained inflows also come alongside a strengthening Bitcoin market, with BTC currently trading at $77,516.55, up 10.73% over the past month, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

Related: Bitcoin ETFs Surpass March Inflow Streak With $1.9B

Bitcoin ETF investors hold firm

The recent steady stream of capital has pushed flows back into positive territory for 2026, with cumulative total net inflows reaching $58.23 billion.

This trend comes even as Bitcoin remains about 35% below its record high reached in early October, ETF analyst Nate Geraci wrote in a recent post on X. He said this pattern suggests that ETF investors are taking a longer-term approach rather than reacting to short-term volatility. The continued inflows during a market drawdown point to a more resilient investor base, often described as “diamond hands” in crypto circles.

“ETF investors proving to be longer-term allocators,” he wrote.

Related: Spot Bitcoin ETFs Gain $411M as Goldman Files ETF Plan

Ether ETFs see strong inflows

US spot Ether (ETH) ETFs also maintained a strong inflow streak from April 14 through April 22, posting nine consecutive days of net positive flows. However, the streak was broken on April 23, when funds recorded net outflows of $75.94 million.

During the nine-day run from April 14 to April 22, total inflows were consistently solid, with the strongest single-day performance on April 17, when Ether ETFs attracted $127.49 million. Other standout sessions included April 22 with $96.44 million and April 20 with $67.77 million.

Magazine: AI-driven hacks could kill DeFi — unless projects act now

Cointelegraph is committed to independent, transparent journalism. This news article is produced in accordance with Cointelegraph’s Editorial Policy and aims to provide accurate and timely information. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently.