Crypto World
Bitcoin Price Prediction: Will BTC Hold? Or A Drop Is Inevitable?
Bitcoin (BTC) price is struggling to maintain footing above $68,000 today, down 1% as the prediction of selling pressure mounts following a rigid rejection at the $76,000 ceiling a week ago. The market leader is currently navigating a perilous consolidation phase analysts call a “No-Trade Zone,” where conflicting signals between derivatives data and spot buying are creating high volatility.
The rejection at higher levels coincides with a distinct shift in institutional sentiment, evidenced by ETF flows showing signs of reversal amid broader geopolitical uncertainty.
On-chain data from Santiment reveals that large wallet holders, specifically those with significant BTC balances, trimmed positions on the 22nd, dropping collective holdings from 1.15 million to 1.14 million BTC. This distribution suggests that without a decisive catalyst, the path of least resistance remains sideways to down.
Can BTC Hold the $65,000 Support Level Amid Bear Flag Fears?
Bitcoin price technical structure on the 1-day chart presents a precarious setup for bullish prediction. Trading just above $68,000, BTC is oscillating within a narrowing range defined by fading buyer strength.
The immediate concern is the massive volume node between the $70,700 and $63,500 area, where approximately 1.72 million BTC have been transacted. This range acts as a critical battleground; a loss of the lower bound could trigger a cascading liquidation event.
Technically, the formation of a bear flag following the recent 39% flagpole decline raises the risk of a deeper capitulation. If sellers force a daily close below the $63,700 trigger level, Fibonacci extension targets suggest downside exposure toward $57,000 and potentially $52,700.
Conversely, momentum indicators like the RSI are flattening, hinting at a potential hidden divergence that typically precedes a reversal, but confirmation is absent. (Where are the bulls waiting? Likely at the 200-day SMA near $93k or lower trendline support.
For the bullish case to regain validity, price action must decisively reclaim the $71,000 mid-range resistance. Until then, the divergence between stabilizing smaller wallets (1k-10k BTC) and profit-taking mega-whales paints a picture of a market in conflict, often resulting in extended consolidation before the next major impulse.
Discover: The Best New Crypto
Bitcoin Price Prediction Is Down, But Investors Rotate to Infrastructure as Hyper Targets SVM Scalability
While spot Bitcoin struggles with overhead resistance, smart money creates a noticeable trend of capital rotation into high-beta infrastructure plays. Investors often hedge against mainnet chop by allocating to Layer 2 protocols that promise to solve Bitcoin’s velocity constraints. Leading this surge is Bitcoin Hyper ($HYPER), the first-ever Bitcoin Layer 2 to integrate the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM).
The project has defied the broader market pullback, amassing an impressive $32 Million in its ongoing presale. Bitcoin Hyper aims to deliver sub-second finality and high-speed smart contracts directly to the Bitcoin ecosystem, effectively bridging the gap between Bitcoin’s security and Solana’s speed. Current data prices $HYPER at $0.0136 with 36% APY on staking rewards.
This massive fundraising milestone indicates that investors are rotating toward infrastructure capable of unlocking trillions in dormant BTC capital. By utilizing a Decentralized Canonical Bridge, Bitcoin Hyper allows seamless asset transfers, addressing the critical lack of programmability on the main chain. While emerging Layer 2s carry inherent execution risks, the sheer volume of capital raised suggests the market views SVM integration as a necessary evolution for Bitcoin.
Those looking to position themselves before next-generation L2s go live can research Bitcoin Hyper here.
The post Bitcoin Price Prediction: Will BTC Hold? Or A Drop Is Inevitable? appeared first on Cryptonews.
(Incentives that don’t kill your protocol long-term)
The DeFi boom brought us a tidal wave of liquidity mining programs. “Stake our token, earn our token” became the mantra, and for a while, it worked—liquidity poured in. But too often, these early experiments had a fatal flaw: they offered short-term rewards at the expense of long-term protocol health. Welcome to Liquidity Mining 2.0, where incentives are smarter, sustainable, and designed to grow both capital and community without burning the house down.
The Problem with “Free Token” Models
Early liquidity mining campaigns relied heavily on emission-driven rewards. Users were attracted by high yields, often several hundred percent APY, but there were hidden costs:
- Unsustainable inflation – New token issuance diluted existing holders, undermining token value.
- Hot money liquidity – Users chased yield without loyalty to the protocol. Once rewards dropped, liquidity evaporated.
- Governance and protocol risk – Tokens distributed too widely or too quickly sometimes gave control to opportunistic participants, not long-term stakeholders.
In short, free tokens often created a short-term spike, followed by a long-term crash.
Liquidity Mining 2.0: Principles of Sustainable Incentives
To avoid repeating past mistakes, DeFi projects are evolving their approach. Here are the core principles:
1. Reward Quality, Not Quantity
Instead of dumping tokens, protocols now reward actions that strengthen the ecosystem:
- Longer lock-up periods for stakers
- Providing liquidity to underrepresented pools
- Engaging in governance or community building
This ensures rewards are earned, not just grabbed.
2. Multi-Dimensional Incentives
Liquidity Mining 2.0 combines token rewards with non-monetary benefits:
- Exclusive governance privileges or voting power
- Access to premium features or lower fees
- Reputation systems that recognize long-term commitment
By diversifying incentives, protocols retain liquidity and encourage meaningful engagement.
3. Dynamic Emissions
Instead of a fixed APY, protocols now adjust rewards based on:
- Market conditions
- Pool health
- Token performance
Dynamic models prevent over-inflation while maintaining attractive yields for committed users.
4. Cross-Protocol Collaborations
Some projects now reward users for supporting multiple parts of the ecosystem. For example, providing liquidity on one protocol may earn rewards on another, creating network effects and reducing reliance on a single token for incentives.
5. Vesting and Lock-ups
Time-based vesting ensures that rewards are earned over the long term, reducing the likelihood of a massive sell-off right after farming.
Examples of Protocols Doing It Right
- PIVX – incentivizes masternodes and governance participation instead of high-speed token drops.
- Curve Finance – rewards users based on the stability of liquidity provided, favoring sustainable pools.
- OlympusDAO – uses bonding and staking mechanisms to align incentives with long-term treasury health.
These models show that thoughtful design can maintain high liquidity without tanking the protocol’s token economics.
Examples of Protocols Doing It Right
- PIVX – incentivizes masternodes and governance participation instead of high-speed token drops.
- Curve Finance – rewards users based on the stability of liquidity provided, favoring sustainable pools.
- OlympusDAO – uses bonding and staking mechanisms to align incentives with long-term treasury health.
These models show that thoughtful design can maintain high liquidity without tanking the protocol’s token economics.
Moving Forward
Liquidity Mining 2.0 isn’t just a tweak; it’s a mindset shift. Protocols must ask: Are we rewarding participation that grows the ecosystem, or are we just chasing TVL for short-term optics?
The next generation of DeFi projects will combine smart financial incentives with community-aligned strategies, creating ecosystems that are resilient, loyal, and sustainable.
Because in the long run, free tokens may attract wallets, but sustainable incentives attract believers.
REQUEST AN ARTICLE
Stablecoin issuer Circle has urged the European Commission to lower the barrier for institutions to engage with crypto-asset service providers in response to parts of its proposed Market Integration Package — a broad policy initiative aimed at strengthening capital markets in Europe.
In a statement on Monday, Circle said the Commission’s MIP proposals represent a “meaningful step toward a digitally enabled financial system” but also outlined several areas for improvement.
Those included reforming the DLT (distributed ledger technology) Pilot Regime and scaling what the Commission describes as e-money tokens (EMTs) by permitting more crypto-asset service providers to operate. Circle said it submitted its feedback to the Commission on March 20.
The main piece of crypto legislation in Europe is the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation, which took effect in December 2024.
However, it has been widely criticized by some crypto lawyers, including Yuriy Brisov, partner at Digital & Analogue Partners, who argued it is difficult to interpret and that its implementation varies from country to country.
Circle said the Commission’s MIP could offer Europe-based crypto market participants more legal clarity by outlining what crypto-assets can be used as collateral.
Circle recommended lowering the barrier to entry for e-money tokens to be used in settlement by changing the market capitalization threshold under the Central Securities Depositories Regulation.
“Restricting settlement to ‘significant’ EMTs risks excluding euro-denominated EMTs” and creates a “chicken-and-egg scenario that stifles their growth,” Circle said, adding that the thresholds are a “structural barrier to institutional participation and secondary market liquidity.”
Circle seeking to expand EURC in the region
In addition to Circle’s flagship USDC (USDC) stablecoin, the company also offers a euro-backed, MiCA-compliant stablecoin, EURC (EURC), in Europe.
However, Circle noted that no euro-denominated EMT is close to reaching the market cap threshold.
Circle said the Commission should adopt more “adaptive thresholds” that are based on criteria like market uptake and liquidity conditions while conducting supervisory assessments.
Related: ECB opens digital euro work on ATMs and payment terminals
The company also said the DLT Pilot Regime, as currently proposed, restricts cash accounts to credit institutions and central securities depository financial institutions and that it should be expanded to include crypto-asset service providers.
Circle concluded that the MIP “represents a pivotal moment” for the EU to modernize its financial system and that connecting traditional finance with blockchain infrastructure through “clear and proportionate regulation” would unlock new levels of efficiency and liquidity in the region.
Magazine: Clarity Act risks repeat of Europe’s mistakes, crypto lawyer warns
Hostplus, Australia’s third-largest pension fund by member count, is reportedly considering offering cryptocurrencies as an investment option, citing interest from its members in the asset class.
“There’s certainly a demand from some of our members who write in and say, ‘Why can’t I have access to cryptocurrency?’” Sam Sicilia, the fund’s chief investment officer, told Bloomberg on Monday.
Investment offerings in crypto could be available as soon as next financial year, he said, with Bitcoin and other digital assets offered through its ChoicePlus investment option, which allows people to self-manage their retirement savings portfolio.
The plan is still in its design phase and would require regulatory approval, as well as resolution of a range of other issues, such as consumer protections before it could go live.
Hostplus is the third-largest retirement fund (known locally as a super fund) in Australia by member count and the fifth-largest by assets under management at over $96 billion ($139 billion Australian dollars), according to financial comparison site Canstar.
Australia’s total superannuation assets were estimated to be worth around $4.5 trillion Australian dollars by the end of the September 2025 quarter.
“We’d love to get regulatory tick-off, even if it means waiting another six months,” Sicilia told Bloomberg. “We are long-term investors. Six months doesn’t really move the dial for us.”
Super fund members asking for access to crypto
AMP was the first super fund to embrace crypto in May 2024, when it introduced exposure to Bitcoin via Bitcoin futures contracts as part of its investment strategy.
Sicilia told Bloomberg that crypto has evolved significantly since Hostplus first looked at the industry a decade ago.
Related: Ripple targets April for Australian financial license via acquisition
Self‑Managed Super Funds (SMSFs) are currently the main way Australians gain exposure to crypto for retirement savings. SMSFs are retirement funds set up and managed by individuals, rather than conventional funds managed by large institutions on behalf of members.
Australian crypto exchange BTC Markets reported in its Investor Study Report that SMSF registrations increased 69% year-on-year during the 2024–2025 financial year.
OKX Australia CEO Kate Cooper told Cointelegraph in February that a significant area of growth for the exchange has come from SMSF trustees, with a growing number of funds set up specifically so trustees can invest in digital assets, “because they currently can’t invest via the big super funds.”
Magazine: Banks want to run Vietnam’s crypto exchanges, Boyaa’s $70M BTC plan: Asia Express
The US Securities and Exchange Commission’s former top enforcement official reportedly clashed with the regulator’s top brass before resigning last week, with part of the reason being how the agency handled cases involving those close to US President Donald Trump.
Margaret Ryan, the ex-director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, wanted to pursue fraud and other charges in cases involving those in Trump’s orbit, but was resisted by SEC Chair Paul Atkins and other Republican political appointees, Reuters reported on Monday, citing people familiar with the matter.
Two cases that created tension between Ryan and the SEC’s top officials involved crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, both of whom have ties to Trump, with Musk serving as a special White House adviser.
Ryan resigned from the SEC on March 16 after just over six months in her role. An SEC announcement that day did not detail the reason of her resignation.
It comes as the SEC has been under increased scrutiny from Democratic lawmakers over its U-turn on crypto-related cases, as the agency under Trump has dropped or settled multiple cases launched under former SEC chair Gary Gensler.
The SEC did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ryan could not be reached for comment.
Sun and Musk cases a major source of tension
The SEC’s case involving Sun was reportedly among the cases that frustrated Ryan. The agency ended its lawsuit against Sun and three of his companies earlier this month with a $10 million settlement.
The SEC first sued Sun in March 2023, alleging that he and three of his companies sold unregistered securities and engaged in manipulative wash trading. The settlement saw Sun and his companies neither admit nor deny the SEC’s allegations.
Sun became the largest investor in the Trump family’s crypto project, World Liberty Financial, in November 2024 after buying $30 million worth of its tokens. He increased his stake to a total of $75 million in January 2025.
Related: SEC sends proposed crypto interpretation to White House for review
An SEC enforcement official told Reuters that the case against Sun was complicated by shifting crypto guidance and pending crypto laws. It was their understanding that Ryan supported the settlement, but her signature did not appear on court documents.
Tron, a company named in the SEC’s lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It has previously denied commenting on pending legal matters.
The SEC’s case against Musk, filed in the final week of Gensler’s tenure, was also a sticking point for Ryan. The SEC sued Musk in January 2025, claiming he failed to disclose that he “acquired beneficial ownership” of Twitter, now X, in early 2022, allowing him to purchase shares at lower prices.
The SEC and Musk said in a joint court filing on March 17 that they were now in talks to settle the lawsuit. Both the cases against Sun and Musk were reportedly strong and had a good chance of the SEC winning in court, according to lawyers closely following the lawsuits.
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
The company that built decentralized finance (DeFi) powerhouse Balancer is closing.
Balancer co-founder Fernando Martinelli announced Tuesday that Balancer Labs, the corporate entity that incubated and funded the decentralized exchange protocol, will be shutting down.
The decision comes roughly five months after a v2 exploit in November 2025 that drained approximately $110 million in digital assets, as CoinDesk first reported, including osETH, WETH, and wstETH, the third known security breach for the project and the one that created the legal exposure Martinelli cited as the reason for shutting down BLabs.
“BLabs, as a corporate entity, has become a liability rather than an asset to the protocol’s future and is just not sustainable as is without any sources of revenue,” Martinelli wrote in a governance forum post.
Martinelli added he “seriously considered” shutting everything down entirely. But he stopped short of calling for a full wind-down because the protocol still generates revenue.
Balancer was one of the defining names of the DeFi boom. At its peak in late 2021, the protocol held nearly $3.5 billion in total value locked, putting it alongside Aave, Uniswap, and Curve as foundational infrastructure for decentralized trading.
DeFiLlama data shows TVL at $2.96 billion as of October 2021, with fees spiking above $6 million annualized. But the TVL now sits at $157 million, a 95% drop from peak.
The market cap has fallen to $10 million. BAL trades at $0.16 against a fully diluted valuation of $11 million, meaning it trades far below net asset value.
Balancer produced over $1 million in annualized fees over the past three months. That’s not enough to sustain the current operation, but it’s enough to sustain a much leaner one.
The restructuring plan the remaining team is proposing is aggressive. BAL emissions would be cut to zero, ending what Martinelli described as a “circular bribe economy that costs more than it generates.”
The veBAL governance model, which he said was captured by meta-governance protocols like Aura and bribe markets that made voting “unrepresentative of the actual Balancer front line,” would be wound down.
Protocol fees would be restructured so the DAO treasury captures 100% of revenue instead of the current 17.5%. The v3 protocol share would drop to 25% to attract organic liquidity. And a BAL buyback would offer holders exit liquidity at a fair price.
“If you believe in the restructured Balancer, you stay. If you don’t, you get a fair exit,” Martinelli wrote. “That’s honest dealing, and it clears the overhang.”
Essential BLabs team members would be absorbed into Balancer OpCo pending a governance vote. Martinelli himself will have no formal relationship with the protocol after the wind-down but offered to serve as an advisor.
The product scope is narrowing to five areas where the team sees differentiation: reCLAMM pools, liquidity bootstrapping pools, stablecoin and liquid staking token pools, weighted pools, and expansion to non-EVM chains. Everything else gets cut.
BAL was trading at $0.72 as of Tuesday morning, down roughly 88% from its all-time high.
Balancer Labs, the corporate backbone behind the Balancer DeFi protocol, is winding down after years of pressure and a devastating $116 million hack in November. Executives say the move is aimed at preserving the protocol’s long-term viability by shifting control to leaner, cost-efficient governance structures rather than preserving a non-revenue-bearing entity.
In a message from Balancer Protocol co-founders, Fernando Martinelli and Marcus Hardt, the plan is clear: Balancer Labs has become a liability rather than an asset to the protocol, and continuing its operations under the current model is unsustainable. “After careful consideration, I have decided to wind down Balancer Labs. This is not a decision I take lightly,” Martinelli wrote, underscoring that the corporate entity has been absorbing liabilities tied to past incidents without delivering commensurate value.
Hardt echoed the sentiment, acknowledging that the pace of liquidity acquisition came at a cost, diluting Balancer token holders (BAL) in the process. The team is proposing a pivot toward a lean continuation path, with governance moving to a Balancer Foundation and the protocol’s decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) framework. In their view, reducing operating costs and reconfiguring revenue capture could unlock more sustainable upside for the community and BAL holders.
Balancer’s journey from its heyday to today is a cautionary tale for DeFi protocols: a combination of ecosystem stress, security breaches, and shifting incentives can erode value even for blue-chip protocols. Balancer was among the prominent DeFi players during the 2020–2021 bull market, reaching a peak TVL of about $3.3 billion in November 2021. However, the landscape shifted dramatically in the following years, and Balancer’s total value locked has since deteriorated. By October 2025, Balancer’s TVL sat around $800 million, and after the November hack, another roughly $500 million exited within two weeks. Today, Balancer’s TVL is reported near $158 million, illustrating how difficult it remains for DeFi protocols to recover from major security incidents and reputational shocks.
Martinelli argued that the November exploit created real and ongoing legal exposure, making the burden of maintaining a corporate entity that carries the liability of past security incidents untenable. The practical implication is a shift of authority and responsibility away from a centralized corporate structure toward community-led governance that can react more nimbly to risk and opportunity.
Key takeaways
- Wind-down of Balancer Labs and shift to DAO governance: The Balancer Foundation and the protocol’s DAO would assume primary responsibility, moving away from the operating model of Balancer Labs.
- Debt, risk, and historical shocks as core drivers: A $116 million hack in November and ongoing legal exposure have pushed leadership to pursue a leaner, more cost-conscious structure.
- TVL deterioration since the 2021 peak: From a 2021 high of $3.3B to roughly $158M today, with a $500M drop in the two weeks following the November exploit, underscoring the fragility of DeFi liquidity post-crisis.
- Tokenomics under review: Two Balancer proposals are on the table—operational restructuring and a revamp of BAL tokenomics—to empower the DAO to capture revenue and align incentives.
- Revenue signal amid restructuring: Balancer reportedly generated just over $1 million in revenue across the past three months, suggesting real activity exists beneath a challenging economic overlay.
Strategic pivot: from corporate entity to governance-led continuity
The core strategic question facing Balancer is how to preserve the protocol’s value proposition—composability, liquidity pools, and automated market-making—while severing the liabilities associated with the old corporate structure. Martinelli’s framing centers on transforming Balancer’s future into a governance-driven enterprise. By transferring stewardship to the Balancer Foundation and the DAO, the project aims to unlock a more disciplined cost base and ensure that incentives align with long-term sustainability rather than short-term liquidity subsidies.
Hardt’s commentary reinforces this stance. He cautioned that the push to attract liquidity had grown disproportionately expensive relative to the revenue Balancer generated, a dynamic that ultimately diluted BAL holders. The proposed path forward emphasizes cost containment, lower operating expenses, and a revenue model that better channels yields to the DAO’s treasury and governance processes rather than a centralized corporate structure.
Economic realities and what changes on the ground?
The historical context matters for readers trying to gauge what “lean continuation” means in practice. Balancer’s ascendancy in 2020–2021 rested on robust liquidity and diversified pools, but the market eventually exposed fragilities in governance and tokenomics when external shocks hit. The November hack—paired with the legal exposure Martinelli cites—highlights a broader risk for DeFi firms that relied on centralized entities for continuity even as the core protocol operates in a decentralized manner.
Under the proposed framework, the Balancer Foundation would assume operational stewardship, while the DAO would govern protocol parameters through member-driven decisions. The two ballot items circulating among Balancer DAO members reflect the proposed reorganization: one addressing operational restructuring and the other focused on a tokenomics revamp for BAL. Although no exact timelines were provided, the proposals mark a formal step in transitioning from a traditional corporate governance model to a decentralized, community-led structure that could potentially reclaim incentives for users, liquidity providers, and token holders alike.
Despite the restructuring narrative, leadership remains focused on validating the protocol’s underlying utility. Martinelli stated that Balancer “still has real value to build from here.” He emphasized that the challenge lies not in the functionality of Balancer itself but in the economics surrounding the token and the cost structure that has weighed on the ecosystem. “That’s not nothing — that’s a functioning protocol buried under a broken tokenomics model and an overweight cost structure,” he noted, underscoring the possibility that a well-executed governance and tokenomics revamp could recalibrate Balancer’s market position without requiring a complete rebuild.
In a more forward-looking frame, Hardt reiterated optimism about a transition that could yield a stronger, more sustainable protocol on the other side. “Balancer still has real value to build from here. If we can make this transition work, we have a real chance to build a stronger and more sustainable protocol on the other side of it,” he said, signaling that the venture’s potential remains intact if governance and economics align with community incentives.
Implications for BAL holders and the broader DeFi community
For BAL holders, the shift toward DAO governance and a leaner mechanism for revenue capture represents both risk and potential upside. The current tokenomics, which critics have described as misaligned with the protocol’s growth trajectory, could be redesigned to better reward active participation, liquidity provision, and governance involvement. If the two ballot proposals gain traction, the resulting changes could recalibrate how BAL accrues value, potentially restoring confidence among participants who have watched the token’s price and utility drift amid structural changes.
From a broader industry perspective, Balancer’s move illustrates a growing trend: large DeFi protocols rethinking corporate versus community governance as they navigate liquidity headwinds and the consequences of security incidents. The tension between preserving a functioning, revenue-generating protocol and maintaining an agile, decentralized structure remains central to these debates. In practice, the governance pathway could become a litmus test for how effectively a DAO can steward a sophisticated liquidity protocol through a period of stress without sacrificing security or user trust.
Investors and builders should monitor how the Balancer Foundation and DAO approach risk, security, and revenue generation in the coming months. The balance between cost discipline, user incentives, and governance empowerment will likely shape Balancer’s ability to attract new liquidity, preserve its core utility, and demonstrate a model for other protocols facing similar crossroads.
Historically, Balancer’s story contains a recurring theme: the technology can be sound, but economics and governance determine whether a protocol can endure. The forthcoming ballots and any subsequent actions will reveal whether this is a pivot toward vitality or a transition toward obsolescence.
As the community awaits the outcome, readers should note that the questions are less about whether Balancer’s code works and more about whether the economics and governance can be aligned to sustain meaningful activity, liquidity, and value creation in a shifting DeFi landscape.
What remains uncertain is the timeline for the governance transition and the exact design details of the proposed tokenomics revamp. Yet the intent is clear: reframe Balancer as a lean, community-led platform that can endure beyond the current corporate-era constraints and deliver durable value to users and stakeholders alike.
In the coming weeks, observers will want to track the ballot results and any subsequent updates from the Balancer Foundation and DAO, as these will signal the protocol’s willingness to embrace this new governance paradigm and the potential trajectory for BAL’s future utility and distribution of value within the ecosystem.
Bitmine Immersion Technologies chairman Tom Lee has tipped an end to the “mini-crypto winter” impacting Ether, as the company bought another $139 million in ETH last week, bringing it closer to its goal of hitting 5% of the token’s total supply.
Lee said in a statement on Monday that Bitmine has maintained a higher buying pace over the last three weeks as it expects the end to a several-month-long Ether slump in its “base case.”
The crypto markets crashed in October last year, with Bitcoin (BTC) falling from its all-time peak above $126,000 during the month, while Ether declined from its August high of $4,946. Analysts have been debating when the crypto markets will see a meaningful rebound.
Lee pointed to positive catalysts, such as the CLARITY Act advancing in Congress and crypto’s relative stability despite recent turmoil in Iran, as signs that winter is starting to thaw.
“As many have noticed, crypto and particularly ETH have outperformed the broader market since the Iran war commenced, with ETH rising 18% and outperforming equities by 2,450 basis points,” he said.
“This is a marked contrast to Gold, a traditional store of value, which has fallen more than 15%. Crypto is demonstrating itself to be a good ‘wartime’ store of value,” Lee added.
Lee’s statements came as Bitmine disclosed it had purchased an additional 65,341 Ether in the past week (worth $139 million), bringing total holdings to more than 4.6 million tokens.
Bitmine nears Ether accumulation goal
Bitmine has stockpiled roughly 3.86% of the total circulating supply of 120.6 million since announcing its crypto pivot eight months ago.
To reach its goal based on the current total supply, the company will need to buy roughly 1.4 million tokens, which, at current prices, would cost roughly $2.9 billion, according to CoinGecko.
Ether does not have a fixed supply; it can increase or decrease based on whether more is burned than issued.
Related: Early Ethereum whale rebuilds stack with $19.5M in ETH buys
The firm has also leaned heavily into staking, with more than three million of its Ether currently staked.
Bitmine also reported other holdings, including $1.1 billion in cash, 196 Bitcoin, a $200 million stake in Beast Industries, a media company founded by YouTuber Jimmy “MrBeast” Donaldson and a $95 million stake in e-commerce inventory management platform Eightco Holdings.
A flood of companies pivoted to crypto in 2025, with Bitmine rising to the second-largest behind Michael Saylor’s Strategy in terms of holdings. However, some, like the multinational bank Standard Chartered, predict that not all will survive in the long term, which may force them to adopt new strategies or fade away.
StrategicEthReserve is currently tracking 67 large treasury holders of Ether, with Bitmine leading by a large margin. SharpLink Gaming, which held the top spot before being surpassed by Bitmine, is second with 863,000 Ether, while Ether Machine ranks third with 496,000 tokens.
Magazine: Google flags crypto malware, retiree loses $840K in ‘expert’ scam: Hodler’s Digest, Mar. 15 – 21
Two Delaware lawmakers are working to establish stablecoin regulations as part of a broader package of regulatory proposals aimed at “modernizing” the state’s financial sector.
In a statement on Monday, the Delaware Senate Democrats announced that Senator Spiros Mantzavinos and Representative Bill Bush had filed the Delaware Banking Modernization Act (Senate Bill 16) and the Delaware Payment Stablecoin Act (Senate Bill 19).
“This legislative package sends a signal loud and clear: here in Delaware, we’re democratizing our financial services and lowering the barriers to entry, making it easier for all residents to send, receive and save money with just an internet connection,” said Delaware Governor Matt Meyer.
Delaware has generally had a friendly and proactive approach toward crypto and blockchain. As far back as 2016, former Governor Jack Markell launched the Delaware Blockchain Initiative to attract blockchain firms. It has also made minor regulatory adjustments to support the sector.
However, some technology and crypto firms left the state last year, including Coinbase, which reincorporated in Texas after expressing dissatisfaction with Delaware’s Chancery Court, which handles corporate law disputes.
These two bills could help the state re-attract some of these businesses.
“Our administration is focused on attracting the jobs of the future to the First State, and that includes continuing to foster an innovative banking ecosystem that will open doors not just for workers and companies, but for every single person who participates in our economy,” added Meyer.
Stablecoin Act proposes a licensing framework
The stablecoin-focused bill aims to create a licensing framework for stablecoin issuers and digital asset service providers operating in Delaware.
The bill adopts language and definitions from the US government’s Stablecoins Act (GENIUS Act) and “other federal models.”
The bill outlines potential guardrails, including reserve shortfall remediation cascades, mandatory redemption timing standards, capital standards and anti-money laundering obligations.
If approved, the State Bank Commissioner would be directed to implement the rules within a specified timeframe.
Meanwhile, the Delaware Banking Modernization Act primarily focuses on traditional finance, updating corporate governance and organizational requirements for local banking institutions. However, it also references digital assets.
The bill also seeks to update Delaware banking code by providing definitions of digital assets in a bid to offer regulatory certainty around the sector and how it relates to traditional finance.
“It’s been more than four decades since we’ve made any meaningful updates to our state’s banking laws, and in that time, the way people bank and conduct transactions has changed significantly,” said Rep. Bush, adding: “We need to make sure our laws are keeping up with those changes.”
Both bills are still a way off from becoming law. The next stage of progression will see the bills reviewed by the Senate Banking Committee and then debated on by the full Delaware Senate.
The announcement also stated that the lawmakers will file another regulatory proposal in the coming days called the Delaware Money Transmission & Virtual Currency Modernization Act.
It primarily aims to implement consumer protections and standardize the types of activities required for licensing.
US politicians push for crypto regulation and clarity
The Delaware lawmakers aren’t the only ones this week signaling intent to push crypto-related legislation.
Related: Banks push tokenized deposits as onchain cash race intensifies: Report
In an X post on Monday, US Senator Bill Cassidy said he plans to advance his bill at the federal level to bring US “crypto tax rules into the 21st century.”
The bill, introduced in partnership with Senator Cynthia Lummis in September, seeks to address crypto taxation challenges and support the adoption of digital assets in the US.
The bill proposes a $300 de minimis rule for crypto purchases, ending double taxation for miners and stakers and providing taxation parity with other financial assets, among other things.
“It is important for America to be in the driver’s seat on digital assets for both our economy and our national security,” Cassidy said on X.
On Friday, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sent two proposed rules to the White House’s Office of Management and Budget for review, which include a proposal to have most of the crypto assets on the market not treated as securities under federal law.
The proposal would see the SEC potentially change its approach to the industry, and would also give primary oversight of crypto non-securities to the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Commenting on the move via X on Monday, CFTC chairman Mike Selig said his agency and the SEC want to stop crypto being left in “limbo” and provide “clarity for the crypto markets.”
Magazine: Are DeFi devs liable for the illegal activity of others on their platforms?
TRON DAO has scaled up its artificial intelligence fund by a factor of ten, from $100 million to $1 billion, targeting investments in and acquisitions of early-stage startups building core infrastructure for the agentic economy.
The billion-dollar fund, announced on Monday, will focus investments in four areas: agent identity systems, stablecoin-based payment rails, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), and developer tooling for autonomous financial systems.
The expansion is built on Tron DAO’s theses dating back to 2023, which foresees stablecoins becoming the practical medium of exchange between AI agents, stablecoins becoming the natural payment layer for “AI-augmented people,” and the rise of tokenized equity.
Blockchains race to support agentic AI
Tron is just one of many crypto-native ecosystems to expand investment into AI by targeting the agentic payment economy. Solana and Base have also made moves to expand into this nascent field; others recently include Visa, Stripe, and World.
In September, the Ethereum Foundation formally entered the agentic AI race with the launch of the “dAI Team,” which aims to make Ethereum the “preferred settlement and coordination layer” for AI agents and the machine economy.
However, it is a notable contrast to TRON’s approach as Ethereum is positioning itself as a trust and coordination layer rather than a payments rail, leaning into its decentralization ethos rather than competing on speed and fees.
Tron scaling to support AI agents, Justin Sun says
Tron said its blockchain is positioned to serve the future agentic economy with 370 million user accounts, more than $21 billion in daily transaction volume, and over $85 billion in circulating USDt (USDT).
Tron founder Justin Sun previously told Cointelegraph that many AI agent use cases involve small, frequent transactions, “which require networks that are fast and inexpensive to use.”
Average confirmation times are about three seconds on TRON, compared with roughly 12 seconds on Ethereum, “making it well-suited for high-frequency transactions,” he said, citing an Arkham report.
Related: Agentic AI commerce may spell the end of internet ads: a16z Crypto
Regarding scaling, he said the real question is what happens if AI agents move from a handful of applications to mainstream machine-to-machine commerce.
“To support this shift, infrastructure is beginning to develop around the ecosystem,” he continued, mentioning an AI agent framework recently launched on TRON called AINFT, which is designed to help developers build and deploy autonomous agents.
Magazine: Google flags crypto malware, retiree loses $840K in ‘expert’ scam: Hodler’s Digest
Monday’s ceasefire trade lasted about 18 hours.
Bitcoin climbed 3.1% to $70,352 on Tuesday morning, recovering from the weekend’s slide below $68,000, with ether (ETH), solana’s SOL, dogecoin and xrp gaining between 2-4%.
The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that Saudi Arabia has agreed to give the U.S. military access to King Fahd Air Base, reversing its earlier position that its bases couldn’t be used to attack Iran. The UAE has taken similar steps.
Gulf states joining the war directly would transform the conflict from a U.S.-Israel operation into a broader regional coalition, a significant escalation from what markets had been pricing.
Iran’s deputy speaker ruled out talks with the U.S., echoing the Fars news agency denial from Monday evening. The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively shut with only a trickle of vessels making their way through.
Traditional markets responded immediately. S&P 500 futures fell 0.5%. European shares were set to drop 0.8% at the open. Brent crude jumped 4% to about $104. The dollar strengthened 0.3%. Gold fell 1.5%, extending what is now its longest daily losing streak on record.
The gold collapse continues to be the most disorienting signal in global markets. A safe-haven asset falling to record losing streaks during an active and widening war breaks every historical precedent.
The most likely explanation is forced selling by funds facing margin calls across other positions, with gold being the most liquid asset to sell. But whatever the cause, it makes bitcoin’s relative stability even more notable. The token that’s supposed to be the volatile one is holding a range while the one that’s supposed to be steady is in freefall.
The five-day window Trump gave Iran expires Saturday, but Saudi Arabia joining the conflict changes the calculus entirely. A regional coalition fighting Iran is a different war from a U.S.-Israel air campaign, and it puts oil infrastructure on both sides of the Gulf at risk.
Bitcoin is holding $70,000 on a Tuesday morning where everything else is deteriorating. Whether that’s resilience or just the market waiting for the next headline to react to is the question the rest of the week will answer.
ACCC Fines PhotobookShop Over Misleading Influencer Reviews Posted on Social Media
10 Sci-Fi Movies That Are Better Than ‘Project Hail Mary’
Television giants team up against dominant streaming OS & Apple TV
-
Crypto World3 days agoNIO (NIO) Stock Plunges 6.5% as Shelf Registration Sparks Dilution Worries
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Adidas – Corporette.com
-
Politics4 days agoJenni Murray, Long-Serving Woman’s Hour Presenter, Dies Aged 75
-
Tech7 days agoAre Split Spacebars the Next Big Gaming Keyboard Trend?
-
Crypto World2 days agoBest Crypto to Buy Now: Strategy Just Spent $1.57 Billion on Bitcoin During Fear While Early Investors Quietly Enter Pepeto for 150x Potential
-
News Videos6 days agoRBA board divided on rate cut, unusually buoyant share market | Finance Report | ABC NEWS
-
Crypto World2 days agoBitcoin Price News: Bhutan Sells $72 Million in BTC Under Fiscal Pressure, but the Smart Money Entering Pepeto Sees What the Market Does Not
-
Politics6 days agoThe House | The new register to protect children from their abusers shows Parliament at its best
-
Tech4 days agoinKONBINI Lets You Spend Summer Days Behind the Register
-
Politics7 days agoReal-time pollution monitoring calls after boy nearly dies
-
Crypto World6 days agoCanada’s FINTRAC revokes registrations of 23 crypto MSBs in AML crackdown
-
Sports19 hours agoRemo Stars and Kano Pillars Strengthen Survival Hopes in NPFL
-
NewsBeat5 days agoResidents in North Lanarkshire reminded to register to vote in Scottish Parliament Election
-
News Videos6 days agoPARLIAMENT OF MALAWI – PAC MEETING WITH REGISTRAR OF FINANCIAL ON AMARYLLIS HOTEL – INQUIRY LIVE
-
Politics5 days agoGender equality discussions at UN face pushbacks and US resistance
-
Business2 days agoNo Winner in March 21 Drawing as Prize Rolls to $133 Million for Next
-
Business5 days agoWho Was Alex Pretti? 5 Key Facts About the ICU Nurse Killed by Federal Agents in Minneapolis
-
Sports18 hours agoGary Kirsten Accuses Pakistan Cricket Board Of ‘Interference’, Mohsin Naqvi Responds
-
Tech1 day agoGive Your Phone a Huge (and Free) Upgrade by Switching to Another Keyboard
-
Sports4 days ago2026 Kentucky Derby horses, odds, futures, preview, date: Expert who nailed 12 Derby-Oaks Doubles enters picks
You must be logged in to post a comment Login