Crypto World
Cosmos-Based Gravity Bridge Halts After Reported $5.4M Exploit
Gravity Bridge, a decentralized blockchain facilitating cross-chain transfers between Ethereum and Cosmos, was reportedly drained of roughly $5.4 million, prompting validators to halt the bridge.
Onchain analyst Specter first flagged the unusual outflows in a Saturday post on X, revealing that the bridge contract key may have been compromised. “It appears the Gravity Bridge contract key may have been compromised, resulting in the theft of $5.4M,” Specter wrote.
Security firm PeckShield also confirmed the exploit in a post, breaking down the stolen assets as approximately $4.3 million in USDC (USDC), 274 Wrapped Ether (WETH) worth roughly $553,000, $434,000 in USDt (USDT) and 14.164 PAX Gold (PAXG) tokens worth about $64,000.

Source: PeckShield
PeckShield reported that a portion of the haul had already been laundered through instant-swap service ChangeNow and through Binance, while the theft wallet was still holding around 2,102 ETH worth approximately $4.23 million at the time of its report.
Related: StakeDAO exploit creates 5.4 trillion vsdCRV but nets only $91K
Gravity Bridge acknowledges attack
Gravity Bridge acknowledged the incident on X without detailing what went wrong. “There was an unfortunate incident on Gravity,” the team wrote, adding that validators “should halt their validators and orchestrators while this incident is being investigated.” In a follow-up post, the team confirmed the bridge had been halted.
Gravity Bridge allows tokens to move freely in both directions, from Ethereum to Cosmos wallets and DEXs like Osmosis, and from Cosmos-based blockchains back to Ethereum platforms like Uniswap. Unlike bridges that rely on centralized multi-signatures or private node groups, it uses its full validator set to authorize transfers, making it one of the more decentralized bridge designs in the space, according to its website.
Gravity Bridge’s native token is Graviton (GRAV), used by validators to secure the bridge. The token is currently trading at $0.0007053, down 4% over the past day, according to data from CoinMarketCap.
Related: ‘All DeFi unsafe’ claim sparks AI security debate after April hack surge
Bridge exploits are spooking institutions
As Cointelegraph reported, JPMorgan analysts have flagged bridge security as a major challenge in an April research note, questioning whether DeFi can scale to meet institutional demand. The concern comes amid the recent Versus-Ethereum bridge attack, which was the eighth major bridge exploit of 2026, with cumulative losses across those incidents reaching $328.6 million.
Following the KelpDAO breach in April, which drained roughly $290 million and was attributed to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, total value locked across DeFi fell from nearly $100 billion to around $86 billion in just two days, with outflows hitting pools that had no direct exposure to the compromised assets.
Asia Express: North Korea denies crypto hacks, Upbit’s bank tests Ripple
Crypto World
Ethereum (ETH) Price: Major Wallets Load Up While ETH Defends $2,000 Mark
TLDR
- Ethereum currently trades around $2,024, battling to maintain the crucial $2,000 threshold
- Major holders with 100,000+ ETH have increased positions to 17.41 million ETH, reaching a nine-week peak
- Market observer Ted cautions that spot market interest is declining while ETFs experience redemptions, with rallies quickly reversed
- Publicly-traded Bit Digital purchased 8,568 ETH valued at approximately $20 million during recent price weakness
- Standard Chartered continues projecting a $40,000 long-term ETH valuation despite present market challenges
As of May 31, 2026, Ethereum is changing hands near $2,024, maintaining position barely above a pivotal support threshold that market participants are monitoring intensively. Recent trading activity has been predominantly range-bound following several days of sharp price swings around the psychologically important $2,000 mark.

Market sentiment appears divided. While near-term technical indicators suggest vulnerability, blockchain analytics reveal a contrasting picture beneath the surface action.
Market analyst Ted, sharing insights via X, observed that while ETH remains above the $2,000 threshold, the current configuration appears unstable. His analysis highlights diminishing spot market activity, negative ETH ETF flows, and consistent rejection of upward price attempts. According to his assessment, without a decisive close above $2,050, the probability of further downside movement remains substantial.
The $2,000–$2,050 range has emerged as the primary battleground on near-term price charts. Should buyers successfully protect this area, ETH might challenge the $2,100 level. A breakdown would likely target $1,994 initially, with deeper support positioned around $1,900–$1,850.
Major Holders and Corporate Entities Continue Accumulating
Despite sideways price movement, significant stakeholders have been discreetly expanding their ETH positions. Blockchain intelligence from Santiment indicates that addresses containing a minimum of 100,000 ETH have expanded their collective balance to 17.41 million ETH. This represents the strongest accumulation level observed in more than two months. These large holders now control 22.03% of Ethereum’s available supply.
Corporate purchasing activity remains robust as well. Nasdaq-traded company Bit Digital acquired an additional 8,568 ETH valued near $20 million, elevating its complete ETH treasury beyond 158,000 ETH. This purchase occurred precisely during the recent price decline.
Reports indicate that Bitmine’s Tom Lee has also acquired $50 million in ETH, further strengthening the accumulation thesis at present valuation levels.
This week, Standard Chartered reiterated its long-range $40,000 ETH price projection, emphasizing expansion in tokenized traditional assets and decentralized finance applications as catalysts not yet reflected in current market pricing.
Critical Price Zones Under Observation
Examining the ETH/BTC trading pair, Ethereum has experienced declining relative performance versus Bitcoin starting in August 2025. The ratio has now arrived at a significant long-term support area, with market participants anticipating a potential reversal. Analyst Daan Crypto Trades observed that previous ETH/BTC rallies were partially driven by substantial purchasers. Absent a new trigger, any recovery trajectory may develop gradually.
Trader Tardigrade identified that Ethereum is forming a pattern of ascending lows spanning multiple market cycles, a technical formation that has traditionally preceded significant recoveries. While the current pattern awaits confirmation, comparisons to previous cycle troughs maintain longer-term optimistic scenarios.
ETH faces overhead resistance at $2,050, $2,100, and $2,200, with $2,500 representing a broader objective should bullish momentum materialize. Concerning downside risk, $1,994 and $1,850 constitute the price zones attracting greatest trader attention.
Bit Digital’s most recent treasury acquisition of 8,568 ETH, executed during the ongoing price weakness, represents the latest documented institutional purchase activity.
Crypto World
Bitcoin (BTC) Price: Critical Support Level at $71K Could Trigger Rally to $76,600
TLDR
- Bitcoin currently trades around $73,800, registering approximately 3% decline over the last seven days.
- Crypto analyst Michael van de Poppe identifies $71K as critical support level; maintaining this zone could propel BTC toward $76,600.
- Bitcoin spot ETFs have recorded ten straight days of capital exodus, with cumulative outflows surpassing $2.97 billion starting May 15.
- Economic forecaster Timothy Peterson anticipates Bitcoin may climb through summer months but expects peak around late July.
- Technical analyst Ali Charts identifies TD Sequential buy indicator on Bitcoin charts, hinting at possible bounce to $75,000 level.
Bitcoin is currently positioned near the $73,800 mark following a dip to approximately $72,000 earlier in the week—a seven-week low. This downward movement coincided with escalating geopolitical friction involving the United States and Iran, which dampened investor appetite for risk assets. The leading digital currency has shed roughly 3% in value across the previous week.

While BTC has bounced back from its yearly bottom around $60,000 recorded in early February, market participants continue debating whether that low marked the cycle’s floor or merely represents a temporary pause ahead of further declines.
Michael van de Poppe, who founded MN Trading Capital, characterized Bitcoin’s current position as a “pivotal level.” According to his analysis, failure to maintain the $71,000 zone as support could send prices tumbling below $65,000. Yet he emphasized that this technical configuration differs significantly from February’s breakdown pattern.
Van de Poppe further noted that successfully defending current levels could enable Bitcoin to surge toward $76,600. Such an upside breakout would probably catalyze a broader rally across alternative cryptocurrencies, he suggested.
ETF Outflows Signal Market Pressure
Bitcoin spot exchange-traded funds have now experienced capital withdrawals for ten consecutive trading sessions. Aggregate net outflows have surpassed the $2.97 billion threshold since May 15. During this identical timeframe, total ETF holdings have contracted from $104.29 billion down to $94.17 billion.
Blockchain analytics platform Santiment Intelligence suggested that continued ETF outflows might indicate the market is approaching a bottom formation.
Analyst Ali Charts shared on X that Bitcoin has just activated a TD Sequential buy indicator, commenting: “I think a rebound toward $75,000 could be in the cards.”
Trader Daan Crypto Trades similarly highlighted on X that bulls must recover the $74,200 threshold, while defending $72,700 remains essential on the downside.
Bearish Case Still on the Table
Not all market observers believe the bottom has been established. Seasoned trader Peter Brandt indicated in March that $60,000 might not represent the year’s nadir, projecting Bitcoin could retest or dip marginally beneath that threshold during September or October.
Ki Young Ju, CEO of CryptoQuant, cautioned that Bitcoin’s present downtrend might extend into early 2027. He referenced historical profit-taking patterns that generally produce approximately 18 months of subdued performance before sustainable recovery materializes. According to his assessment, the bearish phase commenced in October 2025 as market participants secured profits from the preceding bull run.
Economist Timothy Peterson projected Bitcoin may edge higher throughout summer, though characterized potential gains as “relatively lackluster” and forecast prices could reach their zenith during July’s final week.
CryptoQuant’s Bull-Bear Cycle Indicator flipped positive earlier this month for the first instance since 2023. Bitcoin presently maintains its position just above the $72,700 support threshold that analyst Daan Crypto Trades identified as essential to monitor.
Crypto World
XRP ETFs Record Best Performance While Trader Sentiment Plunges to Multi-Week Lows
Key Highlights
- Trader anxiety surrounding XRP reached a three-week peak, with the bulls-to-bears ratio dropping to approximately 1.10:1.0 by May 25.
- Holders operating on 30-day timeframes are experiencing average unrealized losses approaching 47%.
- The MVRV ratio for the 30-day period has declined beneath December 2020 benchmarks, entering what analytics firm Santiment identifies as an “extreme opportunity zone.”
- United States-based spot XRP exchange-traded funds accumulated $11.88 million on May 29, contributing to $35 million in total inflows between May 20-29.
- During this identical timeframe, Bitcoin ETFs experienced $1.70 billion in outflows while Ethereum ETFs recorded $309 million in withdrawals.
The digital asset has maintained stability around the $1.35 price level despite trader anxiety climbing to its most elevated point in nearly three weeks. Blockchain metrics and institutional fund flow data present contrasting narratives regarding the token’s current market position.

According to Santiment analytics, the sentiment ratio for the cryptocurrency declined to roughly 1.10:1.0 on May 25. This movement positioned the asset within what market observers categorize as the “FUD Zone”—a territory characterized by widespread fear, uncertainty, and doubt across social platforms.
Previous instances of entering this zone have frequently preceded upward price movements. The underlying rationale is straightforward: when the majority of market participants express fear, selling momentum typically diminishes while accumulation opportunities increase.
Despite prevailing negativity, the token has avoided significant downside breaks. The price has successfully defended critical support zones hovering around $1.34.
Market analyst Ali Charts highlighted this specific $1.34 threshold. “I’m monitoring the lower boundary of the ascending channel at $1.34 as a potential accumulation area for XRP,” Ali Charts stated on the social platform X. “Should this level maintain, price objectives rest at $1.37 and $1.40.” The observation emerged as market participants assessed whether the ongoing consolidation phase would resolve upward.
30-Day Holders Face Substantial Unrealized Losses
Santiment metrics reveal that market participants trading on 30-day timeframes are underwater by an average of 47%. A significant portion appears to have liquidated positions near local bottoms following the surrender of profits accumulated during late 2024 and early 2025.
The 30-day Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratio—a metric tracking unrealized gains or losses across the network—has descended below its December 2020 reading. Santiment has designated this territory as an “extreme opportunity zone,” terminology applied when the ratio touches historically depressed levels that have historically preceded price recoveries.
Santiment also identified a notable event on X. The year’s largest exchange deposit occurred Thursday—exceeding 22.80 million XRP tokens transferred to trading platforms. However, in subsequent days, 25.24 million XRP departed from exchanges. Santiment observed this substantial exchange movement coincided with a local price bottom, and that trading values have appreciated roughly 5% following this apparent capitulation event.
Institutional XRP Products Show Persistent Accumulation
While fear metrics paint a pessimistic picture, institutional investment vehicle flows demonstrate the opposite trend.
U.S.-registered spot XRP ETFs registered $11.88 million in net accumulation on May 29. Bitwise commanded the largest share at $7.36 million, with Canary’s XRPC contributing $2.38 million and Franklin’s XRPZ adding $2.14 million.
Between May 20 and May 29, these XRP investment products attracted cumulative inflows totaling $35 million. During this identical window, Bitcoin ETFs hemorrhaged $1.70 billion while Ethereum ETFs experienced $309 million in redemptions.
Aggregate assets under management across U.S. XRP ETFs currently approach $1.12 billion, with total net inflows since inception reaching $1.42 billion.
Spot Bitcoin ETFs documented $125.31 million in withdrawals on May 29, extending a redemption streak to ten consecutive trading sessions.
An outstanding development from October 2025 also lingers in the background. Bloomberg previously disclosed that Ripple Labs was spearheading an initiative to secure at minimum $1 billion through a special purpose acquisition company to amass XRP within a treasury structure. CoinDesk has contacted Ripple requesting confirmation, though no response has been furnished.
Crypto World
Top World Cup 2026 Crypto Coins: Three Layers Riding Football’s Biggest Stage
The FIFA World Cup 2026 begins on June 11 across the United States, Mexico, and Canada. As excitement builds, crypto markets have already formed around the tournament.
However, not every token claiming a World Cup connection offers the same level of exposure. The market has split into three distinct categories. Some projects have direct football partnerships. Others use FIFA branding without authorization.
A third group consists entirely of speculative meme coins built around national teams.
Understanding the difference may help investors separate genuine football-related crypto plays from short-term hype.
The Three Layers of the World Cup 2026 Crypto Trade
World Cup-related crypto assets currently fall into three categories:
- Licensed football infrastructure and fan tokens
- Unofficial FIFA-themed meme coins
- National-team meme coins on Solana
Each layer responds to different catalysts as the tournament approaches.
Layer 1: Licensed Football Tokens With Real Partnerships
This category contains the strongest connection to global football.
Chiliz (CHZ) and Fan Tokens
Chiliz remains the largest football-focused crypto ecosystem through its Socios platform. The project powers fan tokens for clubs and national teams, making it one of the clearest ways to gain exposure to tournament-related activity.
CHZ trades around $0.0339 with a market capitalization of approximately $352 million. The token remains under pressure, down nearly 10% over the past week and 17.5% over the past month.
A major development arrived in March 2026 when US regulators classified fan tokens as digital collectibles rather than securities. The decision removed a key regulatory obstacle and strengthened Chiliz’s expansion plans in the United States.
Among national-team tokens, the most closely watched include:
Argentine Football Association Fan Token (ARG)
- Price: ~$0.41
- Market Cap: ~$7.5 million
- Up 6.5% on the week
- Down 47% on the month
Portugal National Team Fan Token (POR)
- Price: ~$0.37
- Market Cap: ~$4.6 million
Historically, fan-token volatility tends to increase during the group stage as team performance drives trader sentiment.
Avalanche (AVAX)
Avalanche offers a different type of World Cup exposure.
FIFA selected Avalanche to host the FIFA Blockchain, a dedicated Layer-1 network supporting FIFA’s digital initiatives. Since the migration of FIFA Collect, the blockchain has attracted more than 85,000 addresses.
AVAX currently trades near $8.95 with a market capitalization of roughly $3.86 billion.
Meanwhile, FIFA President Gianni Infantino has publicly referenced the possibility of a future FIFA Coin on multiple occasions. No official token exists today, but any announcement during the tournament would immediately affect sentiment across football-related crypto assets.
Another important development came on May 27 when ADI Predictstreet and Fanatics Markets launched FIFA’s first official prediction-market partnership across multiple U.S. jurisdictions.
Layer 2: Unofficial FIFA Meme Coins
The second category consists of tokens that use FIFA branding without any confirmed relationship to FIFA itself.
The largest example is an Ethereum-based token called FIFA, which recently reached a market capitalization of nearly $77 million.
Other examples include:
- FWC26
- FWC
- FIFA世界杯
- Multiple duplicate FWC26 contracts
The biggest risk is confusion.
Many of these projects use nearly identical names despite having no connection to one another. Traders often assume they are buying the same asset when they are not.
Before purchasing any FIFA-themed meme token, investors should examine contract addresses, liquidity, holder concentration, and trading activity.
Layer 3: Solana’s National-Team Meme Coin Ecosystem
The most speculative layer lives on Solana.
These tokens launched primarily through Pump.fun and are designed to capitalize on national-team enthusiasm rather than official partnerships.
WORLDCUP serves as the ecosystem’s central token. It recently surged about 90% in 24 hours and reached a market capitalization near $10 million.
The ecosystem also includes country-specific meme coins such as:
- FRANCE
- SPAIN
- PORTUGAL
- Similar tokens for all 48 qualified national teams
A unique feature of the system routes part of trading fees from team tokens into WORLDCUP buybacks. This creates a feedback loop tied directly to tournament attention.
However, these assets carry the highest risk.
Wallet ownership remains highly concentrated. Most of these tokens depend entirely on momentum, social media attention, and match results. A team’s elimination could trigger immediate selling pressure.
Prediction Markets Already Show Clear Favorites
Prediction markets have become one of the largest crypto-adjacent World Cup narratives.
Combined trading volume across Polymarket and Kalshi has reached approximately $416.7 million for World Cup winner markets.
Current favorites include France, Spain, England, and Brazil.
Meanwhile, Myriad has launched a $100,000 World Cup trading competition powered by Chainlink oracle infrastructure.
The growing activity suggests traders are increasingly using prediction markets rather than traditional sportsbooks to speculate on tournament outcomes.
What To Watch Before Kickoff
Each layer reacts to different catalysts. CHZ, AVAX, and licensed fan tokens are likely to respond to adoption metrics, partnerships, and institutional participation. National-team fan tokens will move with match results and federation news.
Meanwhile, Solana meme coins remain heavily dependent on sentiment and influencer attention. Many could experience sharp rallies during the tournament before fading once the event concludes.
The biggest wildcard remains FIFA itself.
If FIFA announces a native digital asset during the tournament, the entire World Cup crypto market could be repriced overnight.
Until then, investors should distinguish between licensed football projects, unofficial FIFA-themed tokens, and purely speculative meme coins before taking exposure.
The post Top World Cup 2026 Crypto Coins: Three Layers Riding Football’s Biggest Stage appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Dash says crypto forgot its original killer app: digital cash
Dash has renewed its focus on digital cash, arguing that peer-to-peer payments remain one of crypto’s most useful goals even as stablecoins, DeFi and decentralized applications take more attention.
Summary
- Dash says digital cash remains crypto’s strongest use case as stablecoins and DeFi gain ground.
- The project says stablecoins carry issuer, peg and freeze risks that digital cash avoids directly.
- Dash links payments, savings, DeFi and DApps to one scarce base money model for users.
Dash said its strategy still follows the early idea behind Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. The project said that use case has lost attention in parts of the crypto market, but it remains central to its roadmap.
In a post on X, Dash described digital cash as the “killer app” for blockchain because it can support direct payments, savings, finance and digital services. The project said digital cash should be fungible, private, fast, low-cost and permissionless.
Dash also argued that digital cash differs from tokenized versions of fiat money. In its view, a true digital cash asset should not only represent money held elsewhere. It should act as the base money itself.
The statement places Dash back inside a long-running debate over whether crypto should focus on payments, trading, stablecoins, yield products or application networks.
Stablecoin risks remain part of the argument
Dash said stablecoins have grown because they move familiar fiat value onto digital rails. However, it argued that stablecoins still depend on outside assets, issuers or algorithms to keep their peg.
The project said this creates risks around depegging, technical failures and centralized control. It also argued that fiat-backed stablecoins keep users tied to currencies that can lose purchasing power over time.
As previously reported by crypto.news, U.S. enforcement actions have also placed stablecoin controls under sharper review. Recent cases included Iran-linked USDT freezes and wider debate over issuer power after Circle-related asset freeze disputes.
Dash used that backdrop to argue that digital cash offers a different model. It said a scarce crypto asset can grow more useful with adoption while reducing reliance on centralized issuers.
DeFi and DApps need usable base money
Dash also linked digital cash to decentralized finance. The project said DeFi markets need a strong unit of value for lending, trading and collateral.
It argued that stablecoins often become the default base asset because many crypto tokens lack daily payment use. Dash said a widely used digital cash asset could serve both DeFi and real-world commerce.
The project made a similar point about decentralized applications. Dash said app networks often rely on gas tokens that users do not spend outside the digital economy.
Dash said its Evolution network aims to support decentralized data and applications while keeping payments at the center. The project framed this as one system for money, data and digital services.
Payments remain Dash’s core pitch
Dash’s wider message is simple. It wants digital cash to serve as money for both online and offline use.
The project said a payment asset should be fast, low-cost and useful beyond speculation. Its public site says Dash payments can settle in about one second and cost less than one cent.
Dash did not reject stablecoins, DeFi or DApps. It said those tools can serve targeted use cases. However, it argued that they work better when built around scarce, usable base money.
That position keeps Dash focused on one of crypto’s oldest goals. While much of the market now chases tokenized dollars, yield products and app platforms, Dash says digital cash remains the foundation for a decentralized financial system.
Crypto World
Billionaire says crypto seizure risk weakens Bitcoin’s gold case
Canadian billionaire Frank Giustra has challenged Bitcoin’s “digital gold” label again, arguing that crypto can still be traced and seized by governments.
Summary
- Frank Giustra said crypto can be traced and seized, weakening Bitcoin’s digital gold claim.
- His comments followed US claims of nearly $1 billion in Iran-linked crypto seizures.
- The debate comes as governments hold seized Bitcoin and increase blockchain enforcement actions.
Giustra made the comments after U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed the seizure of nearly $1 billion in cryptocurrency linked to Iran. The remarks renewed debate over whether Bitcoin can serve as a safe-haven asset like gold.
The mining financier and gold advocate argued that crypto’s public ledger leaves holders exposed to state action. In his view, blockchain records make digital assets easier to trace than physical gold.
His comment came in response to claims that crypto holders can avoid seizure by memorizing seed phrases or holding assets outside exchanges. Giustra rejected that argument and said blockchain tracing can still lead authorities to users.
He wrote that the U.S. government’s Bitcoin reserve is made up of seized coins. He added, “There is no escape,” while arguing that a holder may have to live as a fugitive if authorities pursue them.
US seizure claims fuel the debate
Bessent said U.S. authorities had seized close to $1 billion in crypto tied to Iran-linked networks. The Treasury Secretary said officials were tracking digital funds used outside the traditional banking system.
He also made a direct warning about wallet holders, saying, “Some of them are typing in their wallets right now and have no idea it’s already gone.” The comment drew attention because it framed crypto seizure as an active enforcement tool.
As previously reported by crypto.news, U.S. authorities said they had seized nearly $1 billion in Iran-linked cryptocurrency as part of a wider campaign against Tehran’s financial networks. The same reporting thread showed that Tether froze $344 million in USDT across two Tron wallets linked to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps after sanctions and law enforcement action.
The cases show the difference between crypto assets. Stablecoin issuers can freeze tokens directly when they receive legal or compliance requests. Bitcoin cannot be frozen by an issuer, but public records can still support tracing, court orders, exchange seizures and recovery actions.
Bitcoin reserve adds another layer
Giustra has often used government-held Bitcoin to question the digital gold narrative. He has argued that if state reserves mostly come from confiscations, Bitcoin’s resistance to seizure is weaker than supporters claim.
A previous crypto.news report noted that the U.S. government was estimated to hold about 328,372 BTC as of February 2026. That made it the largest known state holder of Bitcoin at the time.
For Giustra, that point matters because seized Bitcoin now forms part of official reserve discussions. He argues that this weakens the claim that Bitcoin is beyond government reach.
Bitcoin supporters often respond that self-custody gives users more control than bank deposits or exchange balances. They also argue that memorized seed phrases and peer-to-peer transfers can reduce reliance on custodians.
Giustra’s counterpoint focuses on practical risk. He says users still face tracing, legal pressure, border controls, exchange surveillance and personal security risk if authorities link them to specific wallets.
Gold comparison remains unsettled
The Bitcoin versus gold debate has grown as investors search for assets outside fiat currencies. Bitcoin supporters point to its fixed supply, global transferability and independence from central banks.
Gold advocates argue that physical gold has a longer track record, no public digital trail and no need for internet-based settlement. Giustra has repeatedly said Bitcoin behaves more like a speculative asset than a true safe haven.
His latest comments do not claim that Bitcoin has no market value. They focus on whether crypto deserves the same protection status investors often attach to gold.
The debate now sits between two facts. Bitcoin gives holders direct control when they use self-custody, but governments can still trace transactions and seize assets through custodians, legal orders or recovery cases.
For now, Giustra’s argument keeps pressure on one of Bitcoin’s strongest narratives. If crypto can be traced and seized, he says, it should not be treated as digital gold in the same way as physical bullion.
Crypto World
Bitcoin dip buyers curb selling; spot volumes wavering, futures weak
Bitcoin’s latest price action highlighted ongoing selling pressure tied to exchange-traded product (ETF) flows, even as supportive buying appeared at key levels. A string of large outflows continued to weigh on the market, following last week’s $1.42 billion withdrawal and the prior week’s $1.26 billion redemption. Despite the persistent pressures, traders reported spot-buying activity near a crucial support level, helping to defend around $70,000 as the market tried to avoid a deeper pullback.
In the backdrop, the dynamics of ETF outflows, futures exposure, and on-chain signals painted a mixed picture. While the immediate price action reflected continued liquidity drain from ETF redemptions, fresh spot demand and strategic positioning in futures markets created pockets of resilience. Cointelegraph’s observation of spot-market activity indicated that demand resurfaced at or just above the $70,000 mark, offering a floor even as the broader downtrend persisted in other timeframes. Spot-volume patterns noted earlier by Cointelegraph.
Key takeaways
- ETF selling continued to dominate near-term price action, with back-to-back weekly redemptions contributing to volatility and subdued upside momentum.
- Spot-buying activity helped defend the $70,000 support zone, indicating persistent demand beneath a psychological and technical floor.
- Open interest remains skewed toward higher strike levels, with roughly $300 million concentrated in the $73,000–$74,000 range, where traders opened new leveraged longs.
- The order-book landscape showed modest bid-side strength, implying traders view dips below $75,000 as buying opportunities rather than reasons to abandon risk they’ve accumulated.
ETF outflows versus spot demand: reading the market mood
Market technicians and observers have been parsing the tug-of-war between ETF-related liquidity drains and real-money demand nudging Bitcoin higher on intraday timeframes. The outflows exert immediate downward pressure on price when liquidity exits, yet on-chain and spot-market signals suggest a more nuanced balance. In recent days, the surge in ETF redemptions has coincided with inflows on Coinbase and notable futures liquidations, illustrating how the selling pressure can be absorbed by a combination of long-positioned longs and recovered spot demand.
Beyond simply tracking price, analysts are paying close attention to the persistence of spot-volume support and how it aligns with futures exposure. The latest data point from spot markets indicates that buyers have been stepping in at or near key levels, helping to create a temporary floor. This dynamic matters because sustained spot demand at critical price points can reduce downside risk and reduce the velocity of further declines, even if ETF-driven liquidity remains a constant headwind.
Market microstructure: what the order books and open interest reveal
Several microstructure signals suggest that the market is attempting to price in continued volatility while not ceding all ground to the bears. An open-interest heatmap showed approximately $300 million of open interest concentrated in the yellow band around $73,000 to $74,000, consistent with a cohort of traders adding leveraged long exposure at higher prices. This pattern points to a belief among some market participants that Bitcoin could stage a relief rally from elevated levels, even if overall momentum remains uncertain.
On the order-book side, Hyblock’s analysis of the bid-ask ratio—calibrated at a 10% aggregate depth—turned modestly positive. In practical terms, the indicator moving above zero signals a tilt toward buyers in the immediate order book, with a tendency for demand to step in when prices dip toward the mid-to-high $70,000s. The ratio’s movement suggests, at least in the short term, that traders see prices below roughly $75,000 as discounted—creating a mechanism for price support through selective buying and risk-taking by traders with longer time horizons.
Although the combination of ETF outflows, Coinbase inflows, and occasional futures liquidations has created intermittent selling pressure, the reported data also show that spot-buying and long-position accumulation have been sufficient to prevent a rapid downside acceleration. In practical terms, the market is absorbing selling with a floor being formed around the $70,000–$75,000 band, but there is not yet a clear pivot point signaling a sustained reversal in the broader trend.
What could shift momentum next
Looking ahead, analysts say a few narrative catalysts would be needed to unlock a larger repricing of spot and futures positions. Among them are renewed optimism around macro-political developments that could lower risk premia, tangible spot ETF inflows that strengthen demand in the physical market, or a softening in macro indicators such as crude oil prices that could reframe risk appetite across asset classes. A potential White House statement on strategic considerations for a Bitcoin reserve, while speculative, would also feed into the broader discussion about the role of digital assets in national-level policy frameworks.
These factors matter because they would either validate the current repricing dynamics that support spot demand or catalyze a broader shift in momentum that could push liquidity seeking across exchanges and products. For traders, the key takeaway is to watch how quickly new narratives translate into tangible order-flow shifts—whether as stronger spot buying at lower levels or larger-scale futures positioning that could propel a more decisive move in either direction.
In the longer view, the market remains sensitive to developments in ETF product approvals, regulatory guidance, and the evolving relationship between on-chain activity and centralized venues. While the near-term thread points to a cautious, mixed landscape, the underlying question for investors is whether the current floor can outlast the selling pressure long enough to establish a more durable base for a new rally.
Readers should keep an eye on fresh market catalysts, especially any progress on the narrative themes discussed above, as well as continued spot-volume patterns and open-interest movements that could signal a shift in momentum in the days ahead.
Crypto World
Arthur Hayes Doubles Down on Hyperliquid Prediction, Sees HYPE Overtaking Solana
Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX, set a $150 price target for Hyperliquid (HYPE) and said the token should surpass Solana (SOL) before the current bull run ends.
Hayes posted the call on X, pushing back against widespread claims that the crypto market has turned bearish.
Hayes Pushes Back on Bear Market Sentiment
The posts drew quick skepticism. When one user declared they were in “a bear market,” Hayes replied that his speculative altcoin holdings disagreed.
He argued that this divergence between broad market weakness and outperforming high-risk assets points to a bull market that remains intact for the right positions.
Hayes has previously bought into HYPE, accumulating over 26,000 tokens. His latest posts suggest that position has grown into a high-conviction bet. He cited the Clarity Act and TradFi resistance in his thesis.
Can HYPE Overtake Solana Before the Cycle Ends
Hayes has previously forecast a bull cycle running through 2028, anchored by stablecoin expansion and increased speculative trading volumes.
Hyperliquid’s buyback program has deployed over $1.16 billion to repurchase HYPE in the open market, providing a structural bid below the market price. The protocol’s revenues have also grown sharply, with Hyperliquid Strategies reporting $152.5 million in quarterly profit.
Hayes believes HYPE can overtake Solana before the bull run ends, even though Solana currently holds a significantly larger market cap and remains the dominant smart contract platform for DeFi and speculative trading.
Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan has reached a similar conclusion on HYPE, describing it as a generational asset. Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan has reached a similar conclusion on HYPE, describing it as a generational asset that should be valued against the $600 trillion global market, not crypto’s $3 trillion universe.
He called Bitwise’s BHYP ETF the strongest single-asset crypto ETP launch since Bitcoin, with nearly $60 million in inflows since mid-May. Hougan labels HYPE a “Gen 2 token” because 99% of fees are used to buy back the token.
Whether HYPE can close that gap with Solana depends on how far the speculative cycle extends. It also hinges on whether Hyperliquid’s revenue trajectory continues to justify the premium Hayes and other institutional backers are now underwriting.
The post Arthur Hayes Doubles Down on Hyperliquid Prediction, Sees HYPE Overtaking Solana appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Cardano price risks $0.113 as Summit 2026 cancellation hits ADA
Cardano price remains under pressure after the Cardano Foundation confirmed that its proposed Cardano Summit 2026 will not take place this year following failed treasury votes.
Summary
- Cardano Summit 2026 was canceled after DReps rejected funding, adding fresh governance pressure around ADA.
- ADA traded near $0.236, below Ali’s $0.247 channel floor, keeping downside targets in focus now.
- RSI and MACD remain weak, while low volume shows buyers have not regained control yet.
The Cardano Foundation said it would respect the outcome of the latest treasury proposal votes after the community rejected funding for the planned Cardano Summit 2026. The organization said governance requires participation and a commitment to accept collective decisions.
In a statement on X, the Foundation said the proposed event “will not take place this year” after the vote failed. It added that it had reviewed feedback from DReps and would begin winding down current Summit-related execution.
The Foundation also said it was encouraged by the close vote and the level of community engagement. It noted that Emurgo’s TOKEN2049 proposal passed, meaning Cardano will still have a presence tied to the major Singapore crypto event.
The result places Cardano’s on-chain governance system back at the center of market attention. DReps now carry more weight in treasury decisions, and recent votes show that large event budgets face tougher review during a weak ADA market.
Cardano price stays near key support
Cardano traded near $0.236 on May 31, according to crypto.news price data. ADA was up 0.52% over 24 hours but remained down 3.55% for the week and 4.79% over the past month.
The token’s market cap stood near $8.77 billion, ranking Cardano at number 16. Trading volume was about $262.7 million over 24 hours, while the day’s range stayed narrow between $0.233913 and $0.238238.
The price action remains weak because ADA is trading close to a long-term support area. Analyst Ali Martinez said Cardano has traded inside a multi-year channel since 2021, with the key floor around $0.247.
According to the analyst, ADA trading near $0.232 marks a major test of that historical boundary. He said a monthly close below $0.247 would change the near-term structure and point to a deeper valuation phase.
RSI and MACD show weak momentum
The latest chart indicators still lean bearish. Volume remains relatively low at about 16.2 million ADA, which suggests that recent price movement lacks strong buying pressure.
ADA has shown a small rebound, but the price remains close to support. A clean breakdown below the $0.23 to $0.24 zone would weaken the setup further. A recovery above $0.27 to $0.30 would be needed to show stronger short-term demand.
The RSI stands at 39.02, below the neutral 50 level. That reading shows bearish momentum, though ADA has not reached the oversold zone near 30.
The RSI also turned lower after failing near its upper range. That move shows buyers lost strength before ADA could build a stronger recovery.

The MACD also shows mild weakness. The MACD line sits at -0.0060, below the signal line at -0.0044, while the histogram stands at -0.0016.
That setup confirms soft downside momentum. However, the histogram bars remain small, so selling pressure has not sharply expanded. ADA still needs stronger volume and a move back above nearby resistance to improve the short-term chart.
Analysts watch $0.113 and $0.051 levels
Ali Martinez warned that if Cardano loses the historical channel floor, long-term accumulation targets may sit much lower. He listed $0.113 and $0.051 as the next high-conviction macro levels for spot buyers.
That forecast depends on whether ADA stays below the $0.247 zone and fails to reclaim it after the monthly close. The level is important because it has acted as a long-term support area since the 2021 market cycle.
The failed Summit vote adds another layer to the price story. It does not directly change Cardano’s code, supply, or network activity, but it shows that treasury spending now faces stronger community review.
Recent related coverage from crypto.news also showed that Cardano’s price setup had already turned fragile before the Summit outcome. ADA previously needed to hold $0.246 to keep a rebound case alive after a TD Sequential buy signal.
That support is now under stress. If ADA remains below the $0.247 floor, traders may focus more on downside levels than on earlier rebound targets near $0.255 and $0.262.
For now, Cardano price analysis remains simple. ADA needs to reclaim $0.247 first. A move above $0.27 would show better demand. Until then, the Summit cancellation and weak indicators keep pressure on the short-term outlook.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Crypto World
15 Years Ago, Hal Finney Explained Why Bitcoin Could Not Simply Be Replaced
Fifteen years ago, one of Bitcoin’s earliest pioneers offered a warning that continues echoing through crypto markets.
Hal Finney argued that a monetary network cannot be rebooted without damaging the credibility of everything that follows.
The Debate Over a New Bitcoin
On May 30, 2011, Hal Finney and Jon Tobey entered a debate called “Early speculators’ reward.”
Basically, it was a discussion on Bitcointalk, where the OP raised a question that has followed Bitcoin since its very first days – was it fair that early adopters mined or acquired coins before most people knew the network existed?
Some participants argued that this early distribution amounted to a significant advantage – so large that the protocol itself should be relaunched. Finney rejected the premise with a response that was not just technical, but also rooted in economic logic.
“Any successful replacement of the Bitcoin block chain will forever undermine the credibility of any successor. […] How is an investor to know that it won’t happen again?”
The Problem of Credibility
Finney’s point seems simple now: if Bitcoin could be discarded because early users benefited, then any future replacement would inherit the same vulnerability, because there would be a new group of early adopters, a later group of users who resent them, and so forth – a vicious circle.
His argument also anticipated what later became a core principle of Bitcoin: monetary networks depend not only on code but also on confidence, continuity, and credible resistance to arbitrary change.
In simple words, Bitcoin’s staying power relies on itself – the Bitcoin staying power. The protocol has become so resistant to unnecessary change that it has brought forward a level of predictability that alternative economic systems cannot yet fathom.
The post 15 Years Ago, Hal Finney Explained Why Bitcoin Could Not Simply Be Replaced appeared first on CryptoPotato.
-
Business7 days agoNYT Strands Answers May 24 2026 Revealed for Puzzle No. 812 Theme Summer Essentials
-
NewsBeat4 days agoIsrael says it has killed new Hamas military leader in Gaza City airstrikes
-
Tech4 days agoNASA taps Blue Origin to deliver lunar rovers for Moon Base initiative
-
Politics6 days agoBridgerton Season 5: Cast, Release Date And Everything We Know So Far
-
News Videos4 days agoXRP *JUST* SUCCEEDED!!!! CLARITY ACT EXPOSED!!! (SHE EXPOSED IT)
-
Sports5 days ago2026 NBA Finals schedule, odds: Knicks await Thunder or Spurs after winning East
-
Business4 days agoSelena Gomez Reportedly Upset Over Benny Blanco’s Comments on Her ‘Terrible’ Diet
-
Crypto World5 days agoMicron Crosses $1 Trillion Market Cap as AI Demand Reshapes Memory Sector
-
News Videos2 days agoThis is BROKEN! INSANE 5x MONEY CAR WASH WEEK! The NEW GTA Online UPDATE Today! (GTA5 New Update)
-
Business6 days agoBTS Sells Out Four Las Vegas Shows at Allegiant Stadium for ARIRANG World Tour
-
Crypto World6 days agoBrian Armstrong Outlines Crypto Vision for the Future Financial System
-
Tech5 days agoChina assigns ID codes to 28,000+ humanoid robots
-
NewsBeat6 days agoHottest May day ever as London hits 34.8C in 2C leap from previous records
-
Tech6 days agoMicrosoft’s quiet Claude Code retreat and the real cost of enterprise AI
-
Tech2 days agoWaymo dominates autonomous vehicle registrations as Tesla trails behind
-
Business5 days agoNikkei 225 Surges Past 65,000 for First Time as Iran Peace Hopes Fuel Record Rally
-
Tech4 days agoThe Samsung pay deal is the moment Korean unions changed register
-
Entertainment5 days ago‘Breaking Bad’ Star’s Easy-to-Binge 6-Part Crime Series Spin-Off Is Finally Heading to Free Streaming
-
Tech6 days agoWestone Audio and Etymotic Acquired by Fidelity Collective in Major IEM Market Move
-
NewsBeat6 days agoCrowds find riverside shade in York as temperatures soar


You must be logged in to post a comment Login