Crypto World
ECB Flags Financial Stability Risks in Euro Stablecoin Proposals
The European Central Bank has pushed back against proposals to expand euro stablecoin issuance, warning that broader access to stablecoins could undercut bank lending and complicate monetary policy. The concerns surfaced as a Brussels think tank argued in favor of loosening liquidity requirements for stablecoin issuers and potentially granting them access to ECB funding, a step aimed at boosting euro-denominated tokens in a market still dominated by dollar-backed rivals. The debate unfolds as Europe remains a major hub for stablecoin activity but remains a small player in terms of euro-denominated supply.
The pushback came after Bruegel, a Brussels-based think tank, presented a policy paper at an informal meeting of EU finance ministers in Nicosia, Cyprus. The authors argued that easing liquidity rules for euro stablecoin issuers and enabling some form of ECB liquidity or funding access could help the euro’s stablecoin market close the gap with dollar equivalents. The core question at the meeting: should Europe tilt toward central bank-style support for stablecoin issuers to improve competitiveness, or preserve traditional banking rails and monetary policy channels?
Key takeaways
- Bruegel’s proposal asks for looser liquidity requirements for euro stablecoin issuers and possible access to ECB funding to spur euro-denominated tokens in a market currently led by the dollar.
- The ECB’s position, led by President Christine Lagarde, signals potential risks to traditional banking: widespread stablecoin issuance could shift deposits away from banks and complicate monetary policy transmission.
- Despite heavy activity in Europe, euro stablecoins remain a tiny share of the market — euro-denominated tokens account for roughly 0.3% of total stablecoin supply, even as Europe conducts about 38% of global stablecoin transactions.
- EURC, the largest euro stablecoin, sits about 12th in global rankings, underscoring the gap to dollar-backed counterparts and the uphill battle to compete on issuance scale.
- As the EU reconsiders MiCA, regulators are weighing how to balance stability with innovation, with central banks cautious about granting new lenders-of-last-resort-style facilities to non-bank issuers.
ECBs stance vs. Bruegel’s case for euro stablecoins
Reuters reported that ECB finance ministers were warned that proposals to expand euro stablecoin issuance could weaken bank lending and complicate monetary policy. The tension centers on whether extending central bank-style support to stablecoin issuers would disintermediate traditional banks and hamper the ECB’s ability to steer interest rates and liquidity conditions. The Bruegel policy paper argues that in a euro-stablecoin market poised to compete with dollar tokens, reducing liquidity barriers and offering some ECB-friendly funding could unlock greater euro adoption.
The central bank perspective, however, remains skeptical. Lagarde and other senior policymakers have argued that even targeted support for stablecoins carries outsized risks. A prominent concern is the potential for stablecoins to pull value from banks during stress, destabilizing deposit bases and increasing funding costs for lenders. Over time, this could erode the effectiveness of the ECB’s policy transmission mechanism. Reuters notes that several central bankers at the meeting questioned the Bruegel proposal to treat stablecoin issuers as lenders-of-last-resort beneficiaries — a role currently reserved for regulated banks.
In a broader context, Lagarde has consistently warned about the trade-offs of widespread euro stablecoins. In a speech at the Banco de España LatAm Economic Forum, she highlighted that while euro stablecoins could raise demand for euro-area safe assets, the associated financial-stability risks, redemption pressures, and potential dampening of monetary policy transmission could outweigh benefits. Rather than pursuing a coin-based approach, Lagarde advocates a tokenized financial infrastructure anchored by central bank money, exemplified by initiatives like the Eurosystem’s Pontes project for wholesale settlement and the Appia roadmap for interoperable tokenized finance.
Officials at the informal Nicosia session also debated whether Europe should pursue tighter controls on redemptions of both US- and EU-issued stablecoins to guard against reserve runs, rather than expanding access to ECB funding. The discussion mirrors a broader regulatory crosswinds as the EU reviews its Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA), which already requires stablecoin issuers to hold substantial reserves in liquid assets, in contrast to the lighter-touch approach seen in the US under the GENIUS Act.
For readers tracking regulatory momentum, the juxtaposition is clear: Europe is weighing how to encourage stablecoin innovation without destabilizing banks or undermining monetary policy. The MiCA review remains a live process, and how Brussels resolves the tension between stability and growth will shape the contours of euro stablecoins for years to come.
The euro stablecoin landscape: a market of contrasts
Even as European activity in stablecoins is sizable, the euro-denominated tokens have not translated into a proportional share of the global supply. Bruegel notes that Europeans conduct roughly 38% of global stablecoin transactions, yet euro-denominated tokens account for a mere 0.3% of total supply. In this context, Circle’s EURC stands as the largest euro stablecoin but ranks only 12th among all stablecoins by market presence, according to CoinMarketCap data.
The metrics spotlight a broader market dynamic: even with substantial regional activity, the euro-stablecoin ecosystem remains comparatively underdeveloped relative to the dollar-dominated landscape. This disconnect underscores why regulators and policymakers are anxious about sanctioning broader access to central bank-style liquidity for euro stablecoins. A deeper liquidity pool and stronger policy clarity could be necessary to lure more users and issuers into the euro stablecoin framework, but doing so risks amplifying channeling effects on banks’ balance sheets if not carefully calibrated.
From an investor and market participant perspective, the numbers imply a measured approach to euro-stablecoin exposure. While a more robust euro-stablecoin rail could facilitate cross-border payments and fintech use cases within the euro area, it could also compress bank funding dynamics if stablecoins offer a compelling alternative for redemption and settlement. The contrast between robust stablecoin activity in Europe and the relatively small euro-stablecoin supply highlights the opportunity for growth, but also the regulatory and systemic risks that policymakers want to manage.
Regulatory backdrop: MiCA, the US regime, and what investors should watch
The MiCA framework has been a central piece of Europe’s attempt to bring stability and oversight to the crypto markets, including stablecoins. Under MiCA, stablecoin issuers are expected to hold sizable reserves in liquid assets to back redemptions and maintain clear governance standards. Critics argue MiCA’s guardrails are more conservative than those seen in other jurisdictions, potentially slowing innovation, while supporters say they are essential for consumer protection and financial stability.
In the United States, the GENIUS Act has been cited as a contrasting approach, often viewed as lighter-touch than European rules. The regulatory divergence between the EU and US is part of the broader debate about which model best fosters innovation while preserving financial stability. The Bruegel paper’s call for closer ECB involvement would represent a further step toward a hybrid framework that blends central bank influence with market-based stablecoins, but it also intensifies questions about sovereignty over monetary policy transmission and the steadiness of the banking sector.
As EU policymakers monitor these tensions, observers will want to watch several indicators: the pace of MiCA updates, the direction of any policy shifts toward or away from lender-of-last-resort-style support for issuers, and the real-world adoption of euro stablecoins by businesses and consumers. For traders and institutions with euro exposure, policy clarity could reduce regulatory risk, while ambiguity could keep headlines and volatility elevated as the regulatory calculus evolves.
One point of ongoing interest is how European banks and payments networks might respond to a more fully realized euro-stablecoin architecture or to a tokenized-finance ecosystem anchored by central-bank money. If the region leans into tokenized settlements as a complement to existing rails, as Lagarde and the Eurosystem have suggested, stablecoin issuance could become part of a broader shift toward interoperable, digital-first financial infrastructure — a trend that could shape liquidity patterns, settlement costs, and cross-border flows in the years ahead.
For investors and builders focused on the euro digital ecosystem, the key takeaway is that the regulatory and central-bank stance remains evolving and nuanced. While Bruegel’s proposals aim to bridge the euro stablecoin gap, the ECB’s current policy posture prioritizes financial stability and the integrity of monetary policy transmission. In practice, this means any move to widen ECB support for stablecoin issuers will likely come with stringent safeguards and clear actuarial metrics to avoid destabilizing bank funding or triggering unintended liquidity stress scenarios.
Looking ahead, market participants should monitor two threads: first, whether the EU logistics and MiCA reform process yields a policy path that meaningfully enhances euro-stablecoin viability without compromising stability; second, whether technology-led solutions like tokenized finance infrastructures—publicly backed by central-bank money—gain traction as the favored route for cross-border settlement and wholesale finance. The outcome will influence not only euro-stablecoins but the broader trajectory of digital finance within the euro area and beyond.
As this regulatory dialogue unfolds, readers should keep an eye on how the balance between innovation and stability shifts. The next milestones to watch include the next formal statements from the ECB on stablecoins, updates to MiCA proposals, and any concrete policy instruments that could align euro-stablecoins with central-bank-backed settlement frameworks while preserving the monetary authority’s ability to manage inflation and banking stability.
Market observers will want to watch for continued disclosures about stablecoin liquidity, reserve composition, and redemptions during periods of stress. If Europe signs on to a pathway that marries tokenized finance with robust oversight, euro-stablecoins could gradually grow from a fringe instrument into a meaningful component of the region’s digital-finance toolbox — provided the balance between accessibility and resilience is maintained.
Source mentions and context include Reuters’ reporting on ECB pushback, Bruegel’s policy paper presented in Nicosia, and CoinMarketCap’s ranking data for euro stablecoins. For readers seeking deeper background, cross-references to related coverage on MiCA reviews and Lagarde’s public remarks offer a fuller view of how EU policymakers are framing the path ahead.
Crypto World
Best Crypto Presale to Buy Now as Crypto Market Crashes, Gruntle Passes $100k Raised
Bitcoin dropped 3.4 percent over the last 24 hours, pulling the flagship asset down to $74,598 and dragging the broader cryptocurrency sector into a severe sell-off. The total market capitalisation shed 3.3 percent, erasing over $80 billion in value overnight as retail buyers scrambled for liquidity across major exchanges. The charts have burned, and institutional support levels are failing to hold the line against the selling pressure. For those scanning the wreckage, Coinbase’s Bitcoin price data confirms a sharp rejection at the $77,000 resistance zone, leaving traders to brace for further downside. The market has collapsed, and the noise is deafening as portfolios take heavy hits across the board.
Ethereum and Solana Extend Losses in Broader Sell-Off
The damage extends deep into the altcoin sector, proving that few assets are immune to the sudden shift in macroeconomic sentiment. Ethereum fell 4.5 percent to $2,025, pushing its 14-day relative strength index down to an oversold 28.9 level, signaling extreme bearish momentum. Solana suffered a heavier 6 percent drop, hitting $81.96 as CoinGecko’s Solana tracking shows trading volumes spiking past $4.4 billion amid panic selling. The global meme coin category retreated 2.5 percent, leaving chart survivors exhausted by the relentless volatility and unpredictable price swings. Most speculative tokens are bleeding heavily, offering little refuge for investors caught in the downtrend as the broader market searches for a definitive floor.
$GRUNTLE Presale Provides a Deadpan Alternative to Market Chaos
While the rest of the market promises impossible recoveries to mask structural decay, Gruntle ($GRUNTLE) offers a deadpan alternative. The project is a survival instrument that allocates 20 percent of its 5 billion token supply to the Deep Mud Reserve for tactical buybacks, providing a deflationary counterweight to the market chaos. There is no fake urgency or influencer hype here. The brand positioning is strictly low hype and high signal, treating the market crash as a simple fact of existence rather than a temporary setback. It is a digital refuge built for those who have accepted the current state of the charts, offering a quiet space away from the frantic trading of liquid spot assets.
Check Out the Gruntle Website to Join the Presale
Round 5 Nears $111.6k Target With 10,766% Variable APY
The intake terminal remains fully operational regardless of spot market conditions, providing a fixed entry point while liquid assets swing wildly. Round 5 is currently 93.35 percent filled, having processed $104,175 of its $111,600 current round target. Terminal-grade citizens entering Gruntle’s intake terminal secure an entry price of $0.000625 before the next price tier opens at $0.000627. Furthermore, the system includes a Hibernation Staking protocol that currently pays a 10,766 percent APY. This yield is strictly variable and computed from a 250 million token pool, meaning the APY decays as more survivors stake their tokens. The early window captures the highest yield, providing a mathematical advantage to those who enter the mud early and wait for the Phase 3 decentralised exchange listing.
Market Volatility Continues as the Presale Intake Remains Open
Analysts suggest the current bearish momentum could push major assets lower before finding a bottom, leaving many traders on the sidelines. The world stays loud, and the charts remain red. The $GRUNTLE presale stays open at $0.000625 with Hibernation Staking currently paying 10,766 percent APY (variable, decays as more enter) and the Phase 3 DEX listing roadmapped.
Secure your allocation before the cap closes the current pricing window.
FAQs
What is the Gruntle presale?
Gruntle is a deadpan meme coin built for exhausted crypto market survivors. The presale offers a structured entry point into the $GRUNTLE ecosystem before public trading begins on decentralised exchanges.
How can I participate in the intake?
Buyers can enter the presale using ETH, USDT, USDC, BNB, or card payments via Web3Payments. The intake terminal is accessible directly at the gruntle.io website.
What comes after the presale concludes?
Phase 3 of the roadmap triggers the decentralised exchange (DEX) listing and initiates applications for CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko tracking. Phase 4 will then pursue centralised exchange listings.
Is the Gruntle smart contract audited?
Yes, the Gruntle smart contract was fully audited by CredShields on May 13, 2026.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. $GRUNTLE is a meme coin with no intrinsic value. Cryptocurrency investments carry significant risk. Always conduct your own research before investing.
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
Crypto World
Schiff Slams MicroStrategy Again Amid Rising Leverage Concerns
Peter Schiff is renewing his attack on MicroStrategy (MSTR), arguing the company’s five-year Bitcoin accumulation strategy has produced a negative total return and that its STRC preferred stock structure depends on price appreciation that has not materialized.
Schiff posted on X that MSTR has deployed approximately $64 billion into Bitcoin (BTC) since adopting its treasury strategy. The position’s total return remains negative as of May 23, he argued. He added that the entire STRC framework depends on bitcoin appreciating roughly 30% per year to fund its 11.5% annual dividend.
STRC’s Yield Math Under the Microscope
Strategy set its STRC dividend rate at 11.50% for March 2026, the seventh consecutive monthly increase since the preferred shares launched in July 2025. The rate is adjusted monthly to keep STRC shares trading near their $100 par value.
Schiff’s critique centers on the sustainability of that obligation. He contends that covering an 11.5% annual payout requires Bitcoin to compound at a rate far above historical averages.
He also notes that ongoing STRC issuance raises that threshold each month as more shares enter the float.
Schiff has previously labeled MSTR a Ponzi scheme, arguing the structure is self-reinforcing on the downside. Under that reading, weak bitcoin performance reduces MSTR’s ability to issue new shares at a premium, limiting the capital available to fund dividends.
“Well it hasn’t even managed to earn 2.5% yet, even over five years, let alone every year for five years. Plus MSTR keeps issuing more STRC. So that 2.5% hurdle rate gets higher every week,” Schiff said.
Pushback From the Thread
Not all observers accept the framing. One commenter argued that MSTR’s bitcoin holdings far exceed its dividend obligations and that a 2.5% compound annual growth rate would be sufficient to cover payments.
Schiff rejected that figure, noting that bitcoin has not even reached that modest threshold since MSTR began accumulating.
A separate participant raised a different issue, arguing the real problem is retail investors failing to grasp the volatility of a leveraged bitcoin proxy rather than any lack of disclosure.
Saylor has publicly challenged Schiff to defend his position, citing MSTR’s long-run price performance relative to traditional assets.
Strategy holds 818,869 BTC at an average cost of roughly $75,540 per coin. With bitcoin trading near $76,800 on May 23, the position sits only marginally above its cost basis.
Whether that margin justifies Schiff’s death-spiral warning or signals a temporary trough will depend on bitcoin’s trajectory. Strategy’s MSTR Bitcoin acquisitions continue, with Saylor yet to acknowledge any structural limit to the approach.
The post Schiff Slams MicroStrategy Again Amid Rising Leverage Concerns appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Proof-of-Pizza: Domino’s, Pizza Hut and Papa John’s Inside of the Bitcoin Pizza Fest
Bitcoin Pizza Day has long served as a symbolic checkpoint for the industry — a reminder of how far digital assets have come from their earliest use case as a medium of exchange.
In 2026, cloud mining platform BeMine is turning that narrative into user growth.
Through its Bitcoin Pizza Fest campaign, the company is structuring a set of incentives around the original premise of the first real-world Bitcoin transaction: exchanging BTC for pizza. The idea is straightforward — recreate a familiar action, attach a crypto-native reward, and use that as an entry point into a broader product ecosystem.
Are Consumer Brands Catching the Crypto Wave?
One of the more visible shifts in crypto today is how it intersects with everyday consumer behavior.
For most of its history, the industry has operated in a relatively closed loop — exchanges, wallets, protocols. Mass adoption has always been the stated goal, but the connection to everyday consumer experiences remained limited.
That is starting to change.
“If you look at how Bitcoin entered the real world, it didn’t happen through infrastructure — it happened through a simple purchase,” said BeMine’s CEO Kiryu Artemev. “In that sense, collaborations between crypto platforms and consumer brands aren’t just marketing. They’re a continuation of that original idea — bringing digital assets into everyday transactions.”
Campaigns built around recognizable brands — in this case, global pizza chains — signal a shift from abstract adoption narratives to something more tangible.
For BeMine, this is not just an experiment in user acquisition, but a step toward embedding crypto into familiar user flows.
“We see this as a natural next stage,” Kiryu Artemev added. “And we’re deliberately early here. The sooner crypto connects to real-world habits, the faster adoption stops being a concept and becomes behavior.”
Infrastructure as the Enabler
BeMine’s core product — fractional access to ASIC mining capacity — is built t reduce operational complexity. Users don’t need to manage hardware or configure infrastructure; instead, they interact with mining as a service.
That abstraction matters most in a campaign context.
The company reports over 400,000 registered users, with steady annual growth. At that scale, marketing initiatives are less about testing demand and more about managing it — making sure spikes in traffic, onboarding, and reward distribution can be absorbed without friction.
According to BeMine, previous campaign cycles have already drawn strong participation», particularly where user-generated content and simple incentives are involved. For Bitcoin Pizza Fest, the expectation is a comparable lift in both new user registrations and re-engagement from the existing base.
There is also a more practical consideration: verification.
Campaigns built around social posts and purchase receipts introduce a manual layer that doesn’t fully disappear with automation. BeMine says it is expanding its moderation and support capacity accordingly.
Internally, the expectation is clear — if participation follows prior trends, the volume will be significant.
Or, put more simply: the system may scale automatically, but someone still has to review the pizza.
Campaign Structure
Running from May 18 to May 31, Bitcoin Pizza Fest is organized around two primary participation paths:
- Share Your Slice
Users post a photo of pizza on X or Instagram, tag @bemineclub, and include #ProofOfPizza, then submit the link via the platform.In return, they receive temporary access to mining capacity — a fractional share of an Antminer S23 for seven days. Participation is capped at 2205 ASIC slots. - Proof of Pizza
Users who purchase pizza from participating chains — Domino’s Pizza, Pizza Hut, Papa John’s, or New York Pizza — can upload their receipt and receive $10 in BTC, credited directly to their account.
From Cultural Reference to Acquisition Channel
Bitcoin Pizza Day is often treated as a retrospective moment — a way to reflect on early adoption.
What campaigns like Bitcoin Pizza Fest suggest is a different use case: turning that narrative into a repeatable acquisition model.
By pairing a widely recognized story with a low-friction action and an immediate incentive, BeMine is effectively testing how offline consumer behavior can feed into crypto onboarding at scale.
Whether this approach extends beyond campaign cycles remains an open question. But if prior participation patterns are any indication, demand is unlikely to be the constraint.
Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.
Crypto World
Crypto trader sees Hyperliquid, AI tokens leading next altcoin rally
Latest developments: Hyperliquid is outperforming much of the crypto market as traders rotate back into higher-risk assets.
- Hyperliquid’s HYPE token hit a new all-time high after two HYPE ETFs launched in the U.S.
- Van de Poppe said European traders have increasingly moved to Hyperliquid because perpetual futures trading remains difficult to access on many regulated venues in Europe.
- He argued Hyperliquid’s push into tokenized stocks, commodities and pre-IPO assets is accelerating broader tokenization trends across crypto markets.
- Van de Poppe said HYPE could rise to $100 or more if crypto market appetite continues to strengthen.
- Van de Poppe joined Jennifer Sanasie on CoinDesk’s Markets Outlook.
What this means: Van de Poppe sees Hyperliquid as a short-term winner but Solana as the stronger long-term conviction bet.
- He said liquidity in crypto markets is concentrating around a small group of protocols generating strong user growth and revenue.
- Van de Poppe said Hyperliquid currently benefits from that concentration but warned competitors will eventually enter the market and pressure its dominance.
- He described Solana as successfully transitioning from a “degen” ecosystem into a more institutional blockchain ecosystem.
- Van de Poppe said Solana’s long-term positioning as infrastructure makes it more attractive than Hyperliquid over a multi-year horizon.
The AI trade: AI-linked crypto projects remain deeply undervalued relative to traditional AI companies, van de Poppe said.
- He pointed to NEAR and Bittensor as two of the strongest infrastructure plays tied to AI adoption in crypto.
- Van de Poppe argued valuations for private and public AI companies have become overheated, while crypto AI tokens have fallen sharply despite continued ecosystem growth.
- He said NEAR’s projected revenue growth from roughly $10 million in 2025 to as much as $100 million this year supports a significantly higher valuation.
- Van de Poppe said Bittensor’s ecosystem expansion and subnet structure could justify prices between $1,000 and $2,000 if adoption continues.
The privacy debate: Privacy remains one of crypto’s biggest long-term themes, but fully anonymous systems face major regulatory risks.
- Van de Poppe said institutional and retail users both want more transactional privacy on blockchains.
- He argued governments are unlikely to support fully anonymous privacy coins over the long term because regulators want visibility into transactions.
- Van de Poppe said funds in Europe already face restrictions interacting with certain privacy-focused assets.
- He pointed to zero-knowledge proof systems and permissioned privacy models as more sustainable paths forward for institutional adoption.
Macro outlook: Van de Poppe said bond yields and central bank policy remain the biggest near-term macro drivers for crypto.
- He said Japanese bond yields are a key market signal and could heavily influence broader risk appetite.
- Falling yields could support equities and crypto markets, while persistent inflation could create headwinds.
- Van de Poppe said he does not expect aggressive rate cuts or renewed monetary easing from the Federal Reserve in the near term.
- He warned additional rate hikes would likely pressure crypto and broader risk assets.
Crypto World
Binance Denies WSJ Report Alleging $850M in Iran-Linked Crypto Transactions
Binance CEO Richard Teng has pushed back against a new Wall Street Journal investigation claiming the exchange processed $850 million in transactions tied to a sanctioned Iranian financier, which eventually flowed to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
In a Friday post on X, Teng called the reporting “fundamentally inaccurate,” saying that Binance never permitted transactions with sanctioned individuals and that any flagged activity occurred before those individuals were placed under US sanctions. He also claimed Binance had investigated the issues before the Journal contacted the company, and that facts it provided were not included in the story.
The Journal’s report, published on Thursday, identified Babak Zanjani, who was re-sanctioned by the US in January, as the central figure in a secret crypto payment network that ran $850 million through Binance accounts over two years. Zanjani’s firm Zedcex, along with accounts belonging to his sister, romantic partner and a company director, all operated from the same devices, per the report.

Source: Richard Teng
The Journal claimed that Binance’s internal compliance reports flagged the Zedcex account after detecting access from Tehran in late 2024. The account stayed open for more than a year, triggering over a dozen further internal alerts. Binance’s own investigators recommended the accounts be shut down and reported to authorities, but the Journal says the accounts remained active.
Related: Binance launches SpaceX-linked perpetual futures ahead of IPO
Binance allowed Iranian funds after settlement: WSJ
Binance pleaded guilty in 2023 to anti-money laundering and sanctions violations and paid a record $4.3 billion fine, pledging to overhaul its compliance systems. However, according to the Journal, the alleged Iranian fund flows resumed shortly after.
In March, the Journal also reported that the Justice Department is now investigating Iran’s use of Binance to evade sanctions in the wake of that guilty plea. Following the report, Binance filed a defamation lawsuit against the publication, seeking damages and a jury trial. The exchange denied knowledge of any DOJ investigation, telling Cointelegraph it continues to cooperate with regulators and law enforcement.
Beyond Zanjani’s network, the Journal claimed that Iran’s central bank moved $107 million in crypto into Binance accounts in 2025, and a foreign law-enforcement agency tracked roughly $260 million in direct transactions between Binance accounts and Iranian terrorist financiers during 2024 and 2025.
“Binance has zero-tolerance for illicit activity and has built and operates a best-in-class industry-leading compliance program that continues to grow,” Teng wrote on X.
Related: Binance says AI-powered security has thwarted $10B in fraud since 2025
Binance denies shutting down internal Iran probe
In February, another Journal report alleged Binance shut down an internal investigation into roughly $1 billion that flowed through the platform to networks linked to Iranian proxy groups. Binance denied dismantling any compliance investigation, saying its internal probe continued and uncovered a sophisticated, multi-jurisdictional pattern of financial activity across Asia, the Middle East and beyond.
The exchange also published a blog post addressing what it called false claims, and separately responded to a Senate inquiry in March, denying it facilitated transactions to Iranian entities.
Magazine: Guide to the top and emerging global crypto hubs — Mid-2026
Crypto World
PopDEX Raises $30 Million as VCs Bet Big on Perp DEX Comeback
PopDEX closed a $30 million strategic seed round this week, led by Foresight Ventures. The raise came as broader crypto venture funding posted its weakest month since early 2025.
The trader-focused perpetual decentralized exchange (perp DEX) said it would seed liquidity and fund security audits with the capital. It also plans to expand its team before a wider product rollout.
Perp DEX Raises Stand Out Against an April Slump
April was crypto venture capital’s weakest month in over a year. Funding fell about 74% month over month to roughly $660 million across 62 deals. That is the lowest monthly total since early 2025.
Deal count dropped close to 49% year over year in the first quarter. Average disclosed round size grew about 76%, per a recent early 2026 funding review.
Money is concentrating in stablecoins, real-world assets, and on-chain derivatives.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
“PopDEX differentiates by its commitment to returning platform value to the contributors who truly drive its growth,” said Zac Tsui, Managing Partner of Foresight Ventures.
PopDEX Pitches Trader-Aligned Incentives
PopDEX, still in invite-only testing, pitches capital efficiency and trader-aligned token economics. Its design returns platform revenue to active traders, not passive holders.
The team has not published audit outcomes, full tokenomics, or a mainnet date.
The model addresses a common criticism of earlier perp DEX launches. Token issuances often rewarded insiders over the traders supplying real order flow.
Foresight Ventures opened a New York strategic office last year. The firm backed the round on execution and trader-first design.
The pitch enters a crowded perp DEX market already dominated by Hyperliquid, Lighter, and edgeX. Most segment volume still sits with a handful of platforms.
Variational and Liquid extend the 2026 cohort
Variational, a separate perpetuals protocol, secured a $50 million Series A on May 20. Backers included Dragonfly Capital, Bain Capital Crypto, and Coinbase Ventures. Variational is launching perpetuals on gold, silver, copper, and oil.
Liquid, a non-custodial perp platform, closed an $18 million Series A in April. Backers included Haun Ventures, SV Angel, and Anti Fund. The three confirmed perp DEX rounds in 2026 total close to $100 million.
The pattern follows late-2025 raises into Cascade, Reya, and Ostium that ranged from $15 million to $24 million each.
“Perp DEX is nowhere close to dead… Think about why VCs keep coming back to this sector: Revenue exists before TGE…,” remarked on-chain researcher Winter Soldier, arguing that VC appetite for the segment is structural, not cyclical.
The harder test arrives after launch. Volume stays heavily concentrated among incumbents. New entrants must convert seed liquidity into steady order flow before token launches.
Hyperliquid’s trillion-dollar milestone raised that bar, dominating DeFi despite market downturn early in 2025 when weekly perps volumes ranged between $40 billion and $50 billion. The move had secured Hyperliquid over 60% of the market share.
PopDEX and Variational being able to sustain that flow could answer the structural question, with these raises capable of signaling a real shift or a brief detour.
The post PopDEX Raises $30 Million as VCs Bet Big on Perp DEX Comeback appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Crypto World
Is Bitcoin’s Recovery Built on Shaky Ground? On-Chain Data Raises Red Flags
TLDR:
-
- Bitcoin was rejected near the $82,400 200DMA, mirroring the March 2022 pattern that preceded a prolonged price downtrend.
- CryptoQuant’s Bull Score Index fell from 40 to 20, returning to extremely bearish levels last seen in early 2026.
- The Coinbase Premium stayed negative throughout the rally, pointing to weak U.S. institutional and retail spot demand.
- Analysts are watching the $70,000 Traders’ On-chain Realized Price as the next critical support zone for Bitcoin.
Bitcoin’s recent price recovery is drawing scrutiny from on-chain analysts. BTC rebounded sharply from April lows and briefly climbed back above $82,000.
However, data from CryptoQuant suggests the move was largely speculative rather than demand-driven. XWIN Japan has flagged this as a critical turning point for the market.
The underlying structure of the rally points to futures activity rather than genuine spot accumulation.
Bitcoin’s 200DMA Rejection Echoes a Familiar Bearish Pattern
Bitcoin’s rejection near the 200-day moving average is one of the clearest warning signs right now. The 200DMA sits around $82,400, a level BTC failed to close above convincingly.
CryptoQuant’s data draws a direct comparison to March 2022’s price action. That period saw a strong relief rally before BTC resumed its broader downtrend shortly after.
The parallel is worth taking seriously given the current market conditions. Back in 2022, the same technical level acted as a ceiling rather than a launchpad.
That rejection marked the beginning of a prolonged correction phase for the asset. The current setup is following a similar sequence, according to available on-chain data.
Futures activity played a central role in driving the recent price recovery above $80,000. Leveraged long positions began unwinding as prices approached that resistance zone.
That unwinding reflects reduced conviction among speculative traders at higher price levels. Without fresh futures demand stepping in, the upside momentum has since stalled.
Spot demand has also softened alongside the futures pullback. US spot Bitcoin ETFs, which were net buyers earlier in May, recently flipped to net sellers.
That reversal removes a key demand pillar that supported BTC during earlier recovery attempts. The shift in ETF behavior is one of the more telling data points in recent weeks.
Bull Score Index and Coinbase Premium Signal Deepening Market Weakness
The Coinbase Premium Index remained mostly negative throughout Bitcoin’s recent rally. That reading points to weak spot demand from both US institutional and retail participants.
Historically, Bitcoin bull markets that hold have been accompanied by a consistently positive premium. The absence of that condition raises questions about the rally’s staying power.
CryptoQuant’s Bull Score Index has since dropped from 40 to 20. That level places market conditions back into “extremely bearish” territory.
The last time the index sat at similar readings was during the February to March 2026 correction. That comparison reinforces the view that broader market structure remains under pressure.
Analysts are now closely watching the $70,000 area as the next major support level. That zone corresponds to the Traders’ On-chain Realized Price, a historically reliable floor during bear market conditions.
A correction toward that level would not be unprecedented given the current data. It remains a key area for market participants to monitor in the near term.
The overall demand picture for Bitcoin has shifted into contraction territory. Spot buying has slowed, futures-driven momentum has faded, and institutional participation has pulled back.
Each of these factors, taken together, paints a cautious picture for the weeks ahead. Whether $70,000 holds as support may define the next major move for BTC.
Crypto World
Ethereum Pullbacks Are Only Being Viewed as Buying Opportunities, On-Chain Data Shows
TLDR:
- Staked ETH has reached all-time highs in 2026, reducing circulating supply and easing selling pressure on the market.
- MVRV data shows Ethereum investors remain profitable but are far from the overheated levels of previous cycle tops.
- Binance depositor activity is not rising aggressively, reducing the short-term distribution risk for ETH holders.
- A steadily rising Realized Cap signals continued capital inflows, a pattern linked to late-stage bull market cycles.
Ethereum continues showing resilience despite ongoing short-term selling pressure across the crypto market. On-chain data, covering Realized Profit, MVRV, Staked Amount, and Binance depositor trends, supports a structurally strong long-term outlook.
While corrections remain possible, analysts note that pullbacks are being absorbed by long-term holders. This activity shows that most participants prefer buying dips over exiting positions.
Rising staked supply and continued capital inflows further support Ethereum’s uptrend as markets head deeper into 2026.
Staked ETH Reaches All-Time Highs as Supply Pressure Eases
ETH staked on the network has grown aggressively since 2023, reaching all-time highs heading into 2026. This trend reflects a growing preference among investors to lock up their holdings for long-term rewards.
A large portion of circulating supply is now locked, reducing the amount available for active trading.
Crypto analyst PelinayPA noted in a recent post that rising staked ETH shrinks available supply and builds structurally bullish conditions.
With fewer coins available on the open market, selling pressure is naturally reduced over time. This dynamic often supports price stability during periods of short-term volatility or profit-taking activity.
The MVRV metric shows that the market is not currently sitting in an undervalued zone. Many investors remain in profit, though the reading remains far from overheated levels recorded during previous cycle tops.
This middle-ground positioning suggests the long-term bull trend is still active and has not yet peaked.
Short-term corrections remain a possibility given the current profit levels across the Ethereum market. However, the broader structure continues to favor buyers rather than pointing toward a sustained bearish reversal.
The combination of reduced circulating supply and profitable investor positions keeps the long-term outlook intact.
Binance Depositor Divergence Points to a Potential Supply Squeeze
Binance depositor activity is one of the most closely tracked metrics for spotting short-term selling pressure. When more investors send ETH to Binance, it typically signals that profit-taking or distribution is approaching.
Previous spikes in depositor numbers have historically been followed by periods of weaker ETH price performance.
At this point, depositor activity on Binance is not rising aggressively despite the broader market environment. Meanwhile, staked ETH continues to climb, showing that larger long-term participants are still withdrawing ETH from circulation.
This divergence between short-term depositors and long-term stakers is creating a growing supply squeeze.
A rising Realized Cap for Ethereum signals continued capital inflows into the network. This metric tracks the total value of all ETH at the price it last moved on-chain.
A steadily climbing Realized Cap is typically associated with late-stage bull cycles rather than bear market conditions.
Taken together, the data suggests that Ethereum pullbacks are likely to remain buying opportunities for the near term.
As PelinayPA noted, unless Binance depositor activity spikes aggressively, the current market structure should continue favoring bulls. Long-term players appear to be positioning for a continued uptrend rather than preparing for any major exit.
Crypto World
SUI Network Goes Gasless on Stablecoin Transfers, Pushing Crypto Closer to Everyday Payments
TLDR:
- SUI Network has eliminated gas fees for stablecoin transfers, removing a major barrier for everyday crypto users.
- Stablecoin projects like USDC, Agora AUSD, and Bucket Protocol BUCK now operate in a more accessible payment environment.
- SUI’s DeFi layer spans lending, trading, and liquid staking, with protocols like Cetus, NAVI, and Haedal leading activity.
- Gaming, NFT marketplaces, and cross-chain bridges round out an ecosystem built to support long-term blockchain adoption.
SUI Network has removed gas fees for stablecoin transfers, allowing users to send payments without holding SUI tokens.
This change removes a long-standing barrier for new crypto users. It also positions SUI as a practical option for everyday payments and remittances.
The move draws attention to the broader SUI ecosystem, which already includes a wide range of DeFi, gaming, and infrastructure projects.
Gasless Transfers Open Doors for Everyday Payments
The decision to make stablecoin transfers gasless changes how users interact with the SUI blockchain. Previously, users needed native tokens to cover transaction costs, which created friction for newcomers. Now, anyone with a SUI wallet can send stablecoins without worrying about gas.
As noted in a post by @ourcryptotalk: “The chain that removes friction for stablecoins doesn’t just win DeFi. It wins payments. It wins remittances. It wins the normie user who never wants to think about gas.”
This development benefits the stablecoin projects already operating on SUI. Circle’s native USDC integration, Agora AUSD, and Bucket Protocol’s BUCK token all stand to see increased usage. Each of these projects now operates in a more accessible environment for regular users.
The change also works alongside SUI’s technical design. Its parallel execution model and object-based architecture already improve transaction speed. Combined with gasless transfers, the chain becomes more competitive for real-world payment use cases.
A Growing Ecosystem Backs the Infrastructure Shift
SUI’s DeFi layer includes established protocols across lending, trading, and liquidity staking. Cetus Protocol leads as the largest decentralized exchange on SUI with concentrated liquidity. NAVI Protocol and Scallop Lend handle lending, while Haedal Protocol leads in liquid staking.
Beyond DeFi, SUI has made a notable push into gaming. Projects like Abyss World, Panzerdogs, and E4C Final Salvation represent different gaming formats on the chain.
Mysten Labs even launched SuiPlay0X1, a dedicated gaming handheld, showing the team’s long-term commitment to the gaming sector.
Infrastructure support continues to strengthen as well. Walrus provides decentralized storage, while bridging solutions like Wormhole, LayerZero, and Axelar connect SUI to other networks. BlockVision and Shinami handle data indexing and node services, keeping the backend running smoothly.
NFT marketplaces, wallet options, and even memecoins round out the ecosystem. BlueMove leads NFT trading, while wallets like Ethos and Sui Wallet offer accessible entry points.
Together, these projects form a layered ecosystem that supports the gasless payment shift from multiple angles.
Crypto World
XRP Long Squeeze Setup: Why Rising Open Interest Could Spark a Sharp Reversal
TLDR:
- XRP’s Open Interest has spiked sharply, pointing to aggressive position-taking in the futures market.
- XRP’s stable Market Cap suggests large holders are not yet distributing, reducing short-term crash risk.
- An overheated NVT Ratio shows XRP’s valuation is outpacing on-chain activity, making rallies fragile.
- The most probable XRP near-term scenario is an upside squeeze followed by a sharp correction afterward.
XRP is showing early signs of building short-term bullish pressure as several market indicators align. Open Interest has spiked in the futures market, reflecting fresh position accumulation among traders.
The NVT Ratio, however, continues producing irregular spikes while remaining at elevated levels. Market Cap has stayed stable, with no aggressive sell-off recorded from large holders.
These combined signals point to a potential squeeze setup, though overall market conditions remain fragile.
Rising Open Interest Signals Active Accumulation in XRP Futures
Open Interest in XRP’s futures market has risen sharply, reflecting aggressive position-taking by active traders. This type of OI increase, when paired with price support, typically strengthens short-term bullish momentum conditions.
The current market structure reflects that environment, though price follow-through will ultimately be the deciding factor. This pattern has historically served as a precursor to sharp directional moves in crypto.
Analyst PelinayPA flagged this pattern in a recent post, noting that XRP’s Market Cap has held steady. This stability suggests large investors are not yet actively exiting or distributing positions.
The probability of a sharp near-term downside crash therefore remains relatively low given the current setup.
That said, risks grow if OI keeps climbing while XRP fails to break new price highs. In that scenario, long squeeze pressure could intensify and produce sudden downside wicks in the market.
Traders watching the OI-versus-price relationship must stay alert for early divergence signals as conditions evolve.
Conversely, a breakout above resistance on rising OI could produce a short but powerful upside move. The current structure leans slightly bullish in the near term, though clear risks continue to persist.
Price action confirmation in coming sessions will separate genuine breakouts from false moves.
Overheated NVT Ratio Raises Fragility Concerns in XRP’s Market
The NVT Ratio is one of the key risk factors currently present in XRP’s broader market picture. It remains extremely elevated and continues producing irregular spikes.
A high NVT means the asset’s market valuation is growing faster than actual on-chain transaction volume. This disconnect between price and network activity is widely associated with fragile and unstable rallies.
Network usage is not expanding at the same rate as the broader market cap growth. That gap suggests price moves are not fully supported by genuine organic demand from the network. Short-term rallies built primarily on futures activity carry a notably elevated risk of sudden reversal.
Given elevated NVT alongside surging OI, an upside squeeze followed by a sharp pullback looks most likely. The initial move higher could be fast and aggressive, driven primarily by futures-market positioning.
Without stronger on-chain activity to support valuations, any rally in XRP remains structurally vulnerable to reversal.
For XRP traders, monitoring how both OI and NVT develop will remain a key priority. Should OI keep rising while XRP breaks new price highs, the squeeze could extend further to the upside.
But if network activity fails to catch up with market cap, correction risk stays persistently elevated across sessions.
-
Crypto World2 days agoBlockchain.com files with SEC for U.S. IPO
-
Fashion21 hours agoHoliday Weekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World6 days agoIntesa Sanpaolo’s crypto holdings jump to $235M as XRP enters
-
Business1 day agoDell Technologies DELL Stock Surges 15% on AI Server Momentum and Analyst Upgrades in 2026
-
Crypto World1 day agoSpace X IPO Is ‘Bad News’ for Tech Stocks: But What About Bitcoin?
-
Fashion7 days agoOn the Scene at Gucci’s Cruise Show in New York City: Mariah Carey, Kim Kardashian, Lindsay Lohan, Iman, and More!
-
Crypto World1 day agoAI infrastructure race heats up as IREN pitches full-stack strategy, WhiteFiber lands $160M deal
-
Politics20 hours agoMakerfield: a tale of two social-media histories
-
Crypto World5 hours agoRobinhood crypto COO Tanya Denisova exits
-
Tech1 day agoA 0.12% parameter add-on gives AI agents the working memory RAG can’t
-
Fashion6 days agoAmazon Sundays: Memorial Day Hosting
-
Entertainment6 days agoOff Campus Easter Eggs Explained: Characters, Stories, More
-
Crypto World5 days agoRevolut Launches Dogecoin Debit Card Across UK and EU
-
Crypto World1 day agoBitcoin Accumulation Weakens as BTC Realized Losses Hit $600M
-
NewsBeat2 days agoCharity run by Reform leader Malcolm Offord accused of ‘law breaking’ over Scottish registration
-
Tech2 days agoWhatsApp ads could make Irish debut after discussions with DPC
-
Sports2 days ago2026 CJ Cup Byron Nelson leaderboard: Brooks Koepka finds putting stroke in Round 1
-
Business6 days ago
Australia defends property tax changes designed to fix ‘broken’ housing
-
Crypto World1 day agoTrump Media’s Bitcoin Stash Shrinks Again as 2,650 BTC Lands on Crypto.com
-
Business1 day agoTrump Invests $1M-$5M in Kura Sushi USA Chain With 27 California Locations




You must be logged in to post a comment Login