• XDC climbed over 10% to surpass $0.037 on May 15, reaching its highest level since early March.
• Catalysts include potential DTCC integration and Bitcoin rally.
• The technical picture highlights resistance at $0.040.

XDC Network price climbed double digits to above $0.037 on May 15, with the uptick pushing the token’s value to its highest level since early March.

XDC now hovers near the key resistance line formed since late January 2026, but can it go higher?

XDC edges higher as market sentiment improves

As noted, XDC rallied sharply on May 15, rising more than 10% intraday as buyers re-entered the market.

The move lifted the token to levels not seen since early March, placing it directly beneath a horizontal supply zone near $0.040.

Trading volumes rose alongside the advance, signalling conviction among participants who are testing whether the late-January resistance can be turned into support.

But why did the XDC Network price surge in the past 24 hours?

The XDC rally coincides with broader strength in the crypto market, led by Bitcoin’s reclaiming of the $80,000 mark.

That recovery prompted many altcoins to retrace losses they incurred during a macro-driven sell-off this week, creating a risk-on backdrop that supported XDC.

Beyond market-wide tailwinds, several project-specific catalysts likely have recently helped to amplify demand.

This includes the potential adoption as a key digital asset of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation.

DTCC, debuting trading in July ahead of full-scale launch in October 2026, has ignited interest in XDC alongside XRP, Chainlink, Quant, and Hedera (HBAR).

While XRP gains momentum as the top token for institutional post-trade settlement, XDC looks to stand out as the primary rail for tokenized bills of lading and letters of credit. XDC’s Contour acquisition, completed in 2025, cements this outlook.

XDC Network price forecast

The latest gains have pushed XDC price further from a descending wedge pattern that had compressed price action since late January.

Bulls are now confronting a horizontal supply zone around $0.040, which also aligns with the 200-day exponential moving average (EMA).

A decisive break and daily close above this level would likely confirm bullish momentum and could open up fresh bids around the $0.046-$0.052 supply zone.

The area marks the range that corresponds to prior congestion and could be the next resistance cluster.

However, bulls must first hold the recently breached $0.037 level. Failure to do so would raise the probability of a pullback to the 100-day EMA near $0.033.

On heavier selling, February’s lows near $0.029 become a plausible target for short-term sellers seeking to reassert control.

HYPE, the native token of decentralized exchange Hyperliquid, jumped more than 23% in the past 24 hours, climbing toward $47 on Friday to hit its highest level since October 2025.

HYPE/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

What is driving the sudden HYPE rally, and does the token have enough momentum to extend its bull run in the coming days?

Key takeaways:

• This week’s multiple US spot HYPE ETF launches have strengthened the token’s institutional-demand narrative.
• Coinbase becoming Hyperliquid’s USDC treasury deployer boosts HYPE prices.

HYPE ETF launches fuel institutional demand hopes

The biggest immediate catalyst behind HYPE’s rally appears to be the arrival of US-listed Hyperliquid exchange-traded products.

On Friday, Bitwise launched its spot Hyperliquid ETF, trading under the ticker BHYP on the NYSE.

HYPE/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The fund gives investors regulated exposure to HYPE and intends to stake a portion of its holdings through Bitwise’s in-house staking division. Its sponsor fee is set at 0.34%, with a full waiver for the first month on the first $500 million in assets.

The launch follows 21Shares’ Hyperliquid ETF, THYP, which debuted on Nasdaq on Tuesday.

A day later, onchain data resource Lookonchain claimed that wallets linked to venture capital firm a16z had purchased nearly $67.5 million worth of HYPE tokens.

Source: X

The purchases reportedly took place in the month leading up to the ETF launches, adding to signs of growing institutional interest in Hyperliquid.

Sustained upside through May will likely depend on whether the HYPE ETFs attract meaningful inflows rather than simply generating launch-week speculation.

As of Friday, they were managing $3.17 million worth of assets, according to SoSoValue data.

US spot HYPE ETFs net flows. Source: SoSoValue

Coinbase, Circle deal adds structural tailwind for HYPE rally

HYPE’s rally also gained momentum after Coinbase announced on Thursday that it had become the official treasury deployer of USDC on Hyperliquid.

The deal strengthens USDC’s role as the main collateral and quote asset across Hyperliquid’s onchain markets.

The stablecoin already accounts for roughly $5 billion in supply on Hyperliquid, making it the dominant stablecoin in the ecosystem, according to DefiLlama.

Stablecoin market cap on Hyperliquid. Source: DefiLlama

Under the upgraded AQAv2 framework, Coinbase is expected to share the vast majority of reserve-yield revenue from USDC deployed on Hyperliquid with the protocol.

Circle will also serve as the technical deployer for USDC on Hyperliquid and has committed to stake 500,000 HYPE tokens.

“It’s an admission that Hyperliquid is too dominant in perps to displace, so better to align and capture distribution,” analyst Aylo said in a Thursday post, adding:

“We should see an increase of ~$140M+ in annualised revenue which will be used to buyback HYPE.”

CLARITY Act progress adds regulatory tailwind

HYPE’s rally also came as US crypto regulation showed signs of progress.

On May 14, the Senate Banking Committee advanced the CLARITY Act in a 15–9 vote, marking a key step for a bill that aims to define when digital assets fall under securities or commodities rules.

The update improved sentiment across crypto markets, sparking intraday rallies in Bitcoin, Ethereum, XRP and other top coins.

Still, the CLARITY Act is not law yet. The bill now heads to the Senate, where it will likely need broader bipartisan support to overcome procedural hurdles.

If it passes the Senate, lawmakers would still need to reconcile it with the House version before sending a final bill to President Donald Trump for approval.

HYPE rising wedge warns of 30% price correction

HYPE’s ongoing upside momentum remains inside what appears to be a rising wedge pattern, confirmed by the price trending inside two converging, upward-sloping trend lines.

In technical analysis, such a wedge typically plays out when the price breaks below its lower trend line and falls to the level at a length equal to the structure’s maximum height.

HYPE/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

Applying this rule to the HYPE chart brings its downside target to the $26.5–$31.20 range, depending on the potential breakdown point, as shown above. That means a potential 30%-45% correction by June or July.

Conversely, a decisive breakout above the rising wedge’s upper boundary may invalidate the bearish setup altogether, pushing HYPE’s price toward the $59–$60 range, aligning with the 1.0 Fibonacci retracement level shown below.

HYPE/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

HYPE’s daily relative strength index (RSI) also supports the short-term bullish case. The indicator remains below the overbought threshold of 70, suggesting the price still has room to extend its rally.

Privacy-focused messaging app Signal has signaled it could exit Canada if forced to comply with the government’s proposed lawful access framework. The legislation, Bill C-22, would require electronic service providers to enable surveillance capabilities and retain user metadata for up to a year, part of a broader effort to aid law enforcement in investigating crimes such as terrorism and child exploitation.

In an interview with The Globe and Mail, Signal’s vice president of strategy and global affairs, Udbhav Tiwari, argued that the bill could threaten end-to-end encryption and leave private messaging services vulnerable to cyberattacks. He said Signal would rather pull out of Canada than compromise on the privacy commitments it has made to users.

Key takeaways

• Bill C-22 would compel tech and messaging providers to build surveillance mechanisms and retain certain user metadata for up to a year to assist law enforcement.
• Signal warns the legislation could undermine encryption and expose private communications to external threats, potentially prompting an exit from Canada.
• The bill is not law yet; parliamentary committee hearings began on May 7 and are ongoing.
• Industry players have mixed reactions: Meta welcomed selective provisions for evidence gathering but raised privacy and cybersecurity concerns, while Windscribe signaled it would consider following Signal if the bill passes.
• The debate echoes broader privacy-security tensions seen in Europe, notably around chat control and client-side scanning proposals.

Encryption under pressure as Bill C-22 advances

The bill, introduced in March as part of a wider regulatory package, would mandate electronic service providers to equip themselves with surveillance capabilities and retain metadata for a defined period. Proponents say the framework would bolster law enforcement’s ability to investigate serious crimes, from terrorism to child exploitation. Critics, however, warn that such measures could erode user privacy and undermine the security guarantees that underlie popular encrypted messaging apps.

Signal’s position highlights a broader industry risk: if end-to-end encryption becomes compromised or undermined by compelled access, the usability and trust in private messaging could be diminished. The Globe and Mail reported that Udbhav Tiwari described the bill as potentially creating vulnerabilities that could be exploited by hackers, undermining the privacy promises Signal offers to its users.

Public discussion around Bill C-22 has already touched on comparisons with the European Union’s controversial privacy proposals, which critics say could push for client-side scanning or other measures that would weaken encryption. The debate frames a larger, ongoing tension between privacy protections and increasing government capability to monitor communications in the name of safety and security.

Industry responses and political context

Tech giants have weighed in with nuanced takes. Meta, for its part, welcomed certain aspects of Bill C-22, arguing that it would provide law enforcement with a clearer legal framework to obtain evidence and protect public safety, while also signaling concerns about the potential impact on Canadians’ privacy and cybersecurity. The company’s stance reflects a common industry position: support for effective enforcement tools, tempered by a demand for clear privacy safeguards.

Canada’s political scene has also spotlighted the privacy-versus-security debate. A post by a Conservative Party Member of Parliament on X asserted that “every member of Parliament in the country uses Signal primarily for its safety and privacy features,” contending that the bill would undermine that privacy. In response, Signal’s leadership indicated it would resist any mandate that compromises user confidentiality.

The bill is not yet law; it must pass through parliamentary review and receive royal assent before taking effect. Committee hearings, which began on May 7, are still underway, signaling that the legislative process could stretch as lawmakers weigh the balance between enforcement capabilities and privacy protections.

Beyond Signal, Windscribe, a VPN provider, warned that the law’s requirements could force providers to log identifying data. In a post responding to The Globe and Mail coverage, Windscribe said it would likely follow Signal in reconsidering its Canadian operations if C-22 advances, arguing that the current draft threatens the core privacy premise of VPNs and similar services.

What comes next for privacy, security, and startups

The unfolding debate places Canada at a crossroads similar to regulatory moves in other regions. As lawmakers refine Bill C-22, observers will be watching not only whether the bill gains passage but how it will affect service design, data retention practices, and cross-border service provision for privacy-centric apps and networks. For developers and users who rely on strong encryption, the central questions are whether the proposed framework can preserve privacy guarantees while providing lawful access tools for investigators, and how firms will operationalize those demands without creating exploitable weak points.

Industry watchers should monitor the committee hearings for clues about potential amendments, as well as any clarifications from tech platforms on how they would implement or resist compliance. The regulatory trajectory in Canada could influence similar debates elsewhere, shaping how privacy-preserving services balance user trust with perceived public safety needs in the months ahead.

Readers should keep an eye on the next set of committee proceedings and any official statements from Signal, Windscribe, and other stakeholders as they gauge how far the government intends to push lawful access measures and what that means for encryption-centric communication tools going forward.