Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Inside the fierce data dispute over whether a sanctioned Russian crypto token is actually working to evade Western blocks

Published

on

Inside the fierce data dispute over whether a sanctioned Russian crypto token is actually working to evade Western blocks

“We truly don’t think there is large-scale, authentic usage of A7A5 outside of A7,” Keegan said in an email, referring to the token’s issuer. He added that transaction volumes routinely collapse on weekends because much of the activity appears tied to business-to-business transfers involving the Russia-linked exchange Grinex.

Meanwhile, Tom Robinson, co-founder of another blockchain analytics firm, Elliptic, also said the token has lost momentum. He said that monthly transaction volumes have fallen by more than 90% since January and are down 96% from their peak last year, following sanctions imposed by the U.S., the European Union and the United Kingdom, as well as the collapse of Grinex earlier this year.

“The cherry-picked trading and transaction figures provided by A7A5 are consistent with Elliptic’s analysis,” Robinson said. “However, they conceal the obvious trend: that A7A5 is failing in its goal of enabling Russian sanctions evasion.”

A7A5’s Ogienko denied these claims and said that because the token’s activity mostly takes place in DeFi, it is not fully captured by major crypto data sites. “These outdated principles and metrics do not provide users around the world with objective information about A7A5,” he told CoinDesk in a statement via Telegram.

Advertisement

He said data providers, including CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko and DeFiLlama rely too heavily on centralized exchange data, creating what he claimed “a generally discriminatory approach, contrary to the principles of the United Nations.”

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

The world cup turned Polymarket into a $5B market

Published

on

Polymarket upholds ‘No’ ruling in disputed Strategy Bitcoin sale market

The biggest sporting event on Earth has become the biggest liquidity event in prediction market history. Billions in tournament volume, a $45 billion June across the sector, one very expensive longshot trap, and a CFTC probe arriving right on schedule.

Summary

  • Polymarket processed about $5 billion in World Cup trading as the tournament drove prediction market volumes to record highs across the sector.
  • The expanded World Cup format and deeper liquidity pushed crypto based event markets into mainstream scale while attracting a large wave of first time users.
  • The surge in activity also brought regulatory scrutiny and raised questions over whether the new liquidity will remain after the tournament concludes.

Four years ago, during the Qatar World Cup, Polymarket processed a grand total of $138,000 in tournament bets. That is not a typo missing some zeros. One hundred thirty-eight thousand dollars, roughly the price of a nice car, across the entire biggest sporting event on the planet.

This summer, the same platform blew through $5 billion in World Cup trading before the knockout rounds finished forming, with tournament totals now estimated around $6.4 billion and climbing. The flagship winner market alone has turned over more volume than many mid-cap tokens see in a month. Across the whole prediction market sector, June closed at $44.8 billion in combined monthly volume, a 75% jump from May, and Bernstein analysts project World Cup wagering could top $10 billion by the July 19 final at MetLife Stadium. Measured against its own 2022 self, Polymarket’s World Cup business grew by a factor of more than forty thousand.

Advertisement

Something changed between Qatar and now, and it was not football. The 2026 tournament has become the moment crypto-native prediction markets stopped being a curiosity and started operating at the scale of the industries they intend to eat. It has also, in the same six weeks, exposed exactly where the model creaks: a longshot problem hiding $1.6 billion of dubious positioning, a regulatory net closing from two directions, and an open question about what happens to all this liquidity on July 20.

The numbers, and why they are absurd

The tournament kicked off on June 11 with a format built for market makers: 48 teams instead of 32, 104 matches instead of 64, three host countries, and a brand-new Round of 32 that added an extra layer of binary, elimination-stakes events. Every match is a market. Every market is several: winner, draw, total goals, advancement. The expanded format nearly doubled the tradeable surface area of the world’s most-watched event.

The results by the numbers:

  • Polymarket’s World Cup-linked contracts passed $2 billion in the group stage, $3.3 billion days later, and roughly $6.4 billion at the latest count, against $138,000 for the entire 2022 tournament.
  • Kalshi, the CFTC-regulated rival, processed about $7.4 billion in World Cup trades, more than its entire March Madness, with its flagship winner market alone drawing over $832 million.
  • Combined June volume across Kalshi, Polymarket, and Polymarket’s new US-regulated exchange hit $44.8 billion, up 75% from May’s $25.66 billion. Kalshi grew 87% month over month to $31.5 billion; Polymarket did $14 billion across both venues, including $3.04 billion on the US platform.
  • Weekly sector volume peaked at a record $14.5 billion, with open interest holding at a record $1.6 billion for three consecutive weeks. Kalshi’s open interest alone crossed $1.16 billion.
  • Reports put Polymarket’s revenue run-rate at $1 billion annualized on World Cup flow.

Individual matches show how deep the liquidity runs. A group-stage fixture between Algeria and Austria, two mid-tier footballing nations, drew $2.82 million. England versus Panama drew $1.76 million even though Panama arrived as the weakest side in the field and left without scoring a goal. Even Paraguay versus Australia, a match with all the global glamour of a Tuesday, cleared $329,000. When dead rubbers between minnows clear six figures, the order book is no longer a novelty. It is a market with depth at every rung of the attention ladder, which is exactly what market makers need before committing balance sheet.

Pricing on the big question has stayed remarkably stable through the chaos. France leads the winner market at roughly 23% to 24% implied probability, with Argentina at 20% to 21%, a rematch scenario the finalist markets take seriously: France at 39% and Argentina at 38% to reach the July 19 final. Argentina has drawn about $81 million in winner-market volume, France $77 million, Portugal $76 million, Spain $68 million, and England $61 million.

Advertisement

How the machine works, for the newcomers it just onboarded

Given how many of this tournament’s traders are first-timers, the mechanics deserve a plain-language pass, because they explain both the volume numbers and the regulatory fight.

A prediction market contract is a share that pays $1 if an outcome happens and nothing if it does not. France to win the World Cup trading at 24 cents means the market assigns France a 24% implied probability; buy at 24 cents and a French title returns $1 per share. Prices move with news, form, and money flow exactly like any order book, and because every share is a token settling on-chain, positions trade continuously until resolution. Polymarket runs on Polygon with markets denominated in USDC, and outcomes resolve through an oracle process, with the UMA optimistic oracle as the traditional backstop where disputes over real-world results get adjudicated by token-holder vote. Kalshi runs the same economic structure through a CFTC-regulated exchange with dollars instead of stablecoins.

The tradability is the entire difference from a sportsbook, and it is why volume comparisons flatter prediction markets. A bettor who backs France at a book locks the position until the final; a Polymarket trader might turn the same conviction over dozens of times, buying strength, selling wobbles, rotating into match markets and back. High turnover on stable open interest, precisely Polymarket’s tournament signature, is the fingerprint of trading behavior layered on top of betting behavior. It also means the platforms earn their status as information machines honestly in one respect: continuous two-sided pricing on live global events, updating in seconds, visible to anyone. During the group stage, Polymarket priced a draw as the most likely single outcome in Paraguay versus Australia at 42.5% while traditional books had Paraguay clearly favored, the kind of public disagreement between market structures that quants notice and harvest.

From election-night stunt to billion-dollar business

The tournament did not create Polymarket’s scale from nothing. It compounded an arc three cycles in the making.

Advertisement

The platform’s first mainstream moment came with the 2024 US election, when its presidential market became a media fixture and its pricing beat several polling aggregates to the result. That visibility arrived with a compliance hangover: Polymarket had operated outside US jurisdiction since a 2022 CFTC settlement barred it from serving American users, and the election spotlight brought raids, investigations, and a long regulatory negotiation. The resolution came in 2025, when the platform acquired a regulated derivatives venue and resumed limited US operations through a compliant exchange, the entity now posting $3.04 billion monthly volumes as Polymarket US.

Kalshi ran the mirror-image path: US-regulated from birth, it fought the CFTC in court for the right to list election contracts, won, and then leveraged the precedent into sports-adjacent event contracts that state gaming regulators now contest. Its reported $1 billion funding round earlier in 2026 and its $31.5 billion June say the strategy found product-market fit at scale.

The World Cup is the first event both platforms entered at full institutional strength, regulated venues live, market-maker relationships mature, mobile products polished, and the $45 billion June is what that maturity looks like when the biggest audience on Earth shows up. For perspective on how completely the sector has outgrown its origins: the entire prediction market industry’s 2022 World Cup handle would not cover thirty seconds of this tournament’s average volume.

Advertisement

The longshot trap: $1.6 billion of hope

Underneath the headline volume sits the tournament’s strangest statistic, and the one that says the most about who is actually trading. Roughly $1.6 billion, a quarter or more of Polymarket’s World Cup total, has been wagered on teams priced at 1% implied probability or less.

Think about what that means. Traders have committed nine figures to the proposition that sides the market gives essentially no chance will lift the trophy. Some of that is rational lottery-ticket buying, one-cent shares that pay a hundredfold if the miracle lands. Some is liquidity provision and hedging that looks stranger in aggregate than it is in detail. But a large share is the oldest pattern in betting: retail money chasing the thrill of the impossible payout, in a venue where the thrill is dressed up as trading.

Prediction market advocates have spent years arguing these venues are information machines, truth engines that price reality better than pundits. The longshot trap complicates the pitch. Markets in which a quarter of the money sits on near-impossible outcomes are not purely information machines. They are also entertainment products, and entertainment money behaves differently: it arrives for the event, it does not shop for edge, and it leaves when the confetti drops. Both things can be true at once, the sharp pricing at the top of the book and the lottery counter at the bottom, but the ratio between them decides what these platforms are when the World Cup is not on.

The user data leans the same direction. A Bitget Wallet study of 857,000 active Polymarket users found 60% had no prior on-chain trading history of any kind. Prediction markets are onboarding people crypto never reached, an achievement by any adoption metric, and those people are arriving to bet on football, not to discover decentralized finance.

Advertisement

What the tournament proved about the rails

Strip out the froth and the infrastructure story is the strongest one here. Positions on Polymarket are tokens settling on-chain via Polygon, which means the tournament has doubled as a live stress test of whether blockchain rails can host institutional-scale event trading. The answer, six weeks in, is yes. You can buy France at 24% today, watch a shaky quarterfinal drop the price, and sell before the next whistle. Positions are tradeable instruments with a live order book, not slips waiting for settlement, and the distinction is precisely why turnover figures dwarf what a sportsbook handle would show for the same interest.

The flow data show the two market leaders running different races. Polymarket’s open interest has held roughly flat while volume spiked, the signature of heavy turnover, traders rotating in and out around every match. Kalshi’s open interest has climbed steadily, pointing to stickier positioning from a user base that skews more institutional and holds through events. Kalshi also entered the tournament with a war chest, having closed a reported $1 billion funding round earlier in 2026, and its $31.5 billion June says the money is being put to work against sportsbooks as much as against Polymarket.

Competition is arriving from inside crypto too. World, a Solana-based prediction market, went live inside the Phantom wallet during the tournament, using Chainlink oracles and taking direct aim at the duopoly, while ADI Predictstreet operates as FIFA’s own first official prediction market partner. The sector that spent 2024 as an election-night curiosity now has a governing-body partnership, a regulated US exchange, and venue competition on three chains. That maturation is happening alongside the industry’s broader mainstream moment at this tournament, with Kraken serving as FIFA’s first official crypto exchange partner across the same six weeks, a deal we examine in full in a companion feature.

Six weeks of price discovery, match by match

The aggregate numbers hide the part traders actually enjoyed: watching the market metabolize a football tournament in real time.

Advertisement

The favorites’ pricing barely moved through six weeks of chaos, France oscillating between 23% and 24% and Argentina between 20% and 21%, a stability that says the market treated group-stage drama as noise around strong priors. The action was in the tails and the match markets. Cape Verde drawing with both Spain and Uruguay to escape Group H repriced an entire bracket path in minutes. DR Congo reaching their first knockout stage since 1974 sent their sub-1% title shares on the kind of hundredfold percentage ride that longshot buyers live for, right up until Harry Kane ended it with two goals in the final fifteen minutes. Panama, priced as the group’s doormat, performed exactly to market: three losses, zero goals, and $1.76 million traded on the England fixture anyway, proof that liquidity follows attention rather than quality.

The draw markets produced the tournament’s most interesting structural signal. Prediction market traders repeatedly priced draws as the most likely single outcome in tight fixtures, 42.5% in Paraguay versus Australia, 46.5% in Algeria versus Austria, while traditional books held moneyline favorites. Two market structures, two different opinions about the same ninety minutes, and a standing arbitrage question for anyone with accounts on both. Group-stage match markets settled into a reliable $500,000 to $2 million volume band regardless of the teams involved, which is the statistic that best captures what changed: four years ago, the entire tournament did $138,000; now that is a slow first half.

The quiet winners underneath the order book

Every trade in this boom runs on infrastructure that predates it, and the tournament has been a revenue and relevance event for the stack beneath the platforms.

Polygon carries Polymarket’s settlement, which means tens of millions of tournament transactions and billions in USDC transfer volume ran through a network that spent two years searching for a flagship consumer use case and found one wearing football boots. Circle benefits wherever the collateral pool grows, since every open position is USDC sitting on-chain. Chainlink’s oracle infrastructure gained a governing-body endorsement through ADI Predictstreet, FIFA’s own first official prediction market partner, and powers World, the Solana prediction market that launched inside Phantom mid-tournament to contest the duopoly on faster rails, one more front in the widening execution-layer contest between Solana and Ethereum. Even the losers of the platform war stand to inherit something: liquidity programs, market-making firms, and resolution tooling built for this tournament become sector infrastructure that any new entrant can rent.

Advertisement

That is the pattern worth filing away. Prediction markets have become the rare crypto vertical whose growth mechanically feeds the base layers underneath it, stablecoin float, L2 throughput, oracle demand, without requiring anyone to believe a new narrative. The World Cup did not just make Polymarket bigger. It made the case that event markets are a durable consumer category for the chains that host them, which is why Solana wants in and why the next cycle of this fight will be fought partly on infrastructure costs.

The real opponent is DraftKings, not each other

Frame the tournament as Polymarket versus Kalshi and you miss the actual contest. The $2 billion-plus that crypto prediction markets processed in World Cup contracts is being measured in real time against sportsbook scale, and the next four weeks decide whether the platforms keep that capital or hand it back to DraftKings and FanDuel when the novelty fades.

The traditional books still dwarf the challengers on absolute handle; US regulated sportsbooks process tens of billions per year on football alone, with decades of brand, state licenses, and parlay products engineered for maximum hold. What prediction markets attack is the margin structure. A sportsbook builds roughly 4% to 6% vig into a standard two-way line and far more into parlays; a prediction market charges the spread plus small fees, with two-sided order flow compressing costs toward exchange levels. For a sharp bettor, the difference between negative-5% expected value at a book and near-zero at an exchange is the difference between a hobby and a career, which is why professional money migrated first.

The Mexico versus England Round of 16 fixture made a clean case study: a high-attention knockout tie where Polymarket’s pricing stayed tight under both retail flood and institutional size, the market-maker backbone absorbing volume without spreads blowing out. Passing liquidity tests like that, repeatedly, on the sport’s biggest stage, is how an exchange steals a customer segment that never comes back to paying vig. The books know it; their lobbying against event-contract sports markets in state legislatures is the sincerest compliment the sector has received.

Advertisement

The structural irony is that prediction markets may win the comparison while losing the framing. The more their World Cup product resembles a better-priced sportsbook, the stronger the state regulators’ argument that it is one.

The regulators arrive at the party

A $5 billion-plus event was always going to draw the state’s attention, and it has, from two directions at once.

The federal track came first: the Wall Street Journal reported the CFTC has opened an investigation into Polymarket, landing just as the platform’s volumes peaked and barely a year after it resumed limited US operations through its regulated exchange. The probe’s scope remains unclear, which in practice means everything from market manipulation surveillance to the perimeter question of which event contracts count as legitimate derivatives.

The state track is broader. More than a dozen state-level authorities have taken legal action against Kalshi and Polymarket, accusing them of offering unlicensed sports betting to residents. The legal theory war here is existential for the sector: if a World Cup winner contract is a financial derivative, the CFTC owns it and federal preemption shields the platforms; if it is a sports bet, thirty-plus state gaming commissions get a vote, and the compliance map fragments overnight. Consumer protection advocates have pushed the second reading hard, and the tournament’s own success is their best exhibit. It is difficult to argue that $1.6 billion of one-percent longshots is hedging activity.

Advertisement

The jurisdictional map adds a third layer of mess, because this World Cup spans three host countries with three different rulebooks. American users navigate the federal-versus-state fight described above. Canadian provinces run their own gaming monopolies with their own views on event contracts. Mexican users face a framework that barely contemplates the product category at all. A tournament marketed as borderless is being traded through one of the most fragmented compliance environments in consumer finance, and every platform’s growth team is effectively running fifty different products wearing one interface.

The platforms are betting that regulated structure wins the argument, and the irony is thick enough to trade: prediction markets are now the subject of the kind of binary, high-stakes, externally resolved event they would normally list. Traders being traders, they occasionally do list it. The outcome will land on an industry already conditioned by this cycle’s macro whiplash, where risk assets have traded like leveraged tech exposure and volume booms have repeatedly decoupled from underlying token prices.

The question that matters: July 20

Every liquidity boom tied to a calendar event carries the same asterisk, and this one expires at full time on July 19.

The bear case writes itself. Fan-adjacent crypto products have a documented post-tournament decay pattern; volumes tied to the Qatar cycle collapsed within weeks of the final. If June’s $44.8 billion was mostly football, July’s number tells us so immediately, and the sector’s valuation narratives, including that billion-dollar Polymarket run-rate, deflate with it. Sixty percent of those 857,000 users have no other on-chain footprint to return to. They came for the World Cup. The World Cup ends.

Advertisement

The bull case is quieter but has data behind it. The June figures functioned as a stress test, and the infrastructure passed: record open interest held for three straight weeks, spreads on marquee matches stayed tight under institutional size, and non-sports volume across Kalshi and Polymarket reached $3.6 billion during the same window, meaning roughly a third of the boom had nothing to do with football at all. Elections, Fed decisions, crypto prices, and cultural events all inherited liquidity and market-making muscle built for the tournament. If even a modest fraction of the new cohort stays, the World Cup becomes the sector’s customer-acquisition event of the decade, acquired at zero marketing cost.

The honest position is that nobody knows the retention number, and the retention number is the entire question. What the tournament has already settled is capacity: prediction markets can absorb global-event liquidity at sportsbook scale on crypto rails without breaking. Whether they can keep it is the trade still open on the board.

Full time approaches

The 2026 World Cup will crown a champion at MetLife Stadium on July 19, and the winner market says it will probably be France or Argentina, though a combined $1.6 billion in longshot money is praying otherwise. For the prediction market industry, the trophy has arguably been lifted already: a forty-thousand-fold improvement on its 2022 self, a June that redefined the sector’s ceiling, and proof that on-chain event trading can operate at the scale of the businesses it wants to replace. The costs of that visibility, a federal probe, a state-by-state legal siege, and a user base of unknown loyalty, all come due in the quiet weeks after the final whistle. The tournament turned Polymarket into a $5 billion market. The off-season decides whether it stays one.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment or betting advice. Prediction markets carry significant financial and regulatory risk, and availability varies by jurisdiction. Always do your own research. Information current as of July 3, 2026.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Donald Trump denies knowing about $1.4B crypto windfall

Published

on

Polymarket chart showing CLARITY Act approval odds falling to 41% in 2026.

President Donald Trump has denied knowing about the at least $1.4 billion in crypto income disclosed in his latest financial filing, while defending both his personal gains and his family’s involvement in the digital asset industry.

Summary

  • Donald Trump said he was unaware of the at least $1.4 billion in crypto income disclosed in his latest financial filing.
  • The disclosure attributes most of the earnings to licensing deals tied to the TRUMP meme coin and WLFI token sales.
  • Trump renewed his call for U.S. crypto leadership as the CLARITY Act faces political and ethics-related hurdles in Congress.

According to a CNBC interview, Trump said he was unaware of the amount of money generated from his crypto ventures, adding that he could know if he wanted to and insisting there was nothing illegal about such earnings. His comments came after the release of his 2025 financial disclosure, which has renewed scrutiny over potential conflicts of interest tied to his family’s crypto businesses.

The financial disclosure, released earlier this week, showed that Trump earned at least $1.4 billion from cryptocurrency-related activities during the reporting period. The filing attributed most of the income to licensing agreements connected to the Official Trump (TRUMP) meme coin and token sales conducted by Trump-backed World Liberty Financial (WLFI).

Advertisement

Earlier, as reported by crypto.news, Trump responded to questions about the disclosure by pointing to gains from the stock market rally but did not address the crypto-related income. His latest remarks are the first direct comments on the digital asset earnings disclosed in the filing.

Financial disclosure renews scrutiny of Trump’s crypto interests

The disclosure has again drawn attention to the Trump family’s expanding presence in the cryptocurrency sector. Critics have previously argued that the family’s business interests could create conflicts while Trump serves as president, particularly as his administration continues to shape U.S. digital asset policy.

Separate criticism has also focused on the launch of the TRUMP and MELANIA meme coins, with opponents alleging the projects extracted liquidity from retail investors. Meanwhile, WLFI, the native token of World Liberty Financial, was also introduced last year. All three tokens remain well below their respective all-time highs following strong declines after launch.

Advertisement

Despite the criticism, Trump maintained in the CNBC interview that there was nothing improper about benefiting from crypto investments. He did not indicate that he planned to distance himself or his family from their digital asset ventures.

Trump continues to push for U.S. crypto leadership

Alongside his comments on the disclosure, Trump repeated his view that the U.S. must remain the global leader in cryptocurrency development. During the interview, he argued that failing to take the lead could allow countries such as China or Japan to dominate what he described as a very large industry.

The president has repeatedly linked that position to his administration’s plan to make the United States the global center for digital assets. As part of that effort, he has urged lawmakers to approve the CLARITY Act, legislation designed to establish a clearer regulatory framework for the crypto industry.

Even so, the bill faces growing political uncertainty. According to prediction market platform Polymarket, traders currently assign a 41% probability that Trump will sign the CLARITY Act into law before the end of the year.

Advertisement
Polymarket chart showing CLARITY Act approval odds falling to 41% in 2026.
Source: Polymarket

Ethics concerns surrounding Trump’s financial interests in cryptocurrency remain one of the main obstacles cited by Democratic lawmakers. With the Senate expected to begin its August recess in the coming weeks, the legislation now faces a narrowing window to advance through Congress before lawmakers leave Washington.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bill Hagerty revives CLARITY Act hopes with new Senate roadmap

Published

on

Ripple deploys CLARITY truck as Senate delay clouds crypto bill

The CLARITY Act has regained momentum after Senator Bill Hagerty outlined a revised Senate timeline that points to floor action after lawmakers return from the July recess.

Summary

  • Bill Hagerty said the Senate could release the final CLARITY Act text this weekend before a post-recess vote.
  • Bloomberg Intelligence now estimates the bill has about a 60% chance of passing this month.
  • NOBLE backed the legislation, while the DOJ disputed claims that it would weaken crypto crime enforcement.

According to reports citing Senator Bill Hagerty, the U.S. Senate is expected to publish the final text of the CLARITY Act this weekend, giving lawmakers and the digital asset industry their clearest look yet at the legislation before debate resumes.

The updated schedule has replaced earlier expectations of a July 4 signing, with Hagerty indicating that a Senate vote is more likely after Congress reconvenes on July 13.

Although the timetable has slipped, political support for the bill has continued to grow. Bloomberg Intelligence recently estimated that the probability of the CLARITY Act passing this month has risen to about 60%, adding to optimism among crypto market participants awaiting a federal market structure framework.

Advertisement

Senate schedule now points to a post-recess vote

Hagerty’s latest comments have shifted attention from an immediate vote to the legislative process expected later this month. Before the Senate can consider the measure, lawmakers are expected to review the final legislative text, which could clarify several provisions that have attracted debate in recent weeks.

Passing the bill will still require at least 60 votes in the Senate. Republicans currently hold 53 seats, meaning the legislation cannot advance without support from several Democrats. During committee consideration, Democratic Senators Angela Alsobrooks and Ruben Gallego voted in favor of the bill, although both later said their committee votes should not be interpreted as commitments to support the legislation on the Senate floor.

Advertisement

Time also remains a factor. As previously reported by crypto.news, the Senate has limited floor time before its August recess, making the period after lawmakers return on July 13 particularly important. If the bill fails to advance during that window, its next realistic opportunity could slip into 2027.

Support from NOBLE strengthens the bill’s position

Alongside the revised timeline, the legislation has gained support from new constituencies. Senator Tim Scott recently argued that businesses innovate more effectively when operating under predictable regulatory rules. 

Scott said the CLARITY Act would establish clear standards for digital assets, improve consumer protections, and help keep financial innovation in the U.S.

Another notable endorsement came from the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE), which became the first major law enforcement organization to publicly back the CLARITY Act, including the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act provisions contained in Section 604.

Advertisement

NOBLE’s position differs from concerns previously raised by four U.S. law enforcement organizations, which argued that Section 604 could make investigations into crypto-related financial crime more difficult by preventing certain non-custodial developers and software providers from automatically being treated as money transmitters. Supporters of the provision have maintained that developers who never control customer assets should not be regulated like financial intermediaries.

The debate expanded after the U.S. Department of Justice disputed claims that the legislation would create major enforcement gaps. As previously reported by crypto.news, the DOJ said criticism of the bill’s law enforcement provisions was inaccurate.

In its endorsement letter, NOBLE similarly argued that the legislation would not weaken existing federal criminal authorities covering money laundering, unlicensed money transmission, sanctions violations, conspiracy, and related offenses.

Industry groups have also continued lobbying lawmakers ahead of the Senate’s return. Stand With Crypto recently urged supporters to contact senators and push for a vote once Congress reconvenes.

Advertisement

The organization argued that prolonged delays could encourage crypto companies, investment, and jobs to move outside the U.S. while the country waits for clearer digital asset regulations.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Standard Chartered wins MiCA passport as EU approves 57 firms

Published

on

Coinbase, OKX chase Binance users as MiCA deadline bites

Standard Chartered has secured a MiCA passport as the European Securities and Markets Authority has added 57 newly authorized crypto firms to its register following the end of the EU’s transition period.

Summary

  • ESMA has expanded its MiCA register to 300 authorized crypto firms after approving 57 new providers.
  • Standard Chartered and FalconX have secured MiCA licenses, gaining passporting rights across all 27 EU member states.
  • The July 1 MiCA deadline has reshaped the EU crypto market, with only licensed firms allowed to serve new customers.

According to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), its latest interim register now lists 300 authorized crypto-asset service providers, up from 243 on June 26, after a wave of approvals arrived around the July 1 Markets in Crypto-Assets deadline.

The updated list includes major banks, institutional trading firms, and digital asset companies that can now offer regulated services across the European Union under a single authorization.

Advertisement

Standard Chartered joins expanding MiCA register

Among the biggest additions is Standard Chartered, which received MiCA authorization from Luxembourg’s financial regulator, the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), on June 25.

The bank also obtained an Electronic Money Institution license, allowing it to use MiCA’s passporting system to provide crypto services throughout all 27 EU member states without seeking separate approvals in each country.

Institutional crypto trading firm FalconX also entered the register after receiving authorization from Malta’s Financial Services Authority shortly before the July 1 deadline.

Advertisement

ESMA’s latest update further added digital asset bank Sygnum Europe, Ronin EM, and CACEIS, the asset servicing business owned by Crédit Agricole and Santander.

Separately, crypto.news recently reported that CACEIS is in exclusive talks to acquire French crypto investment platform Meria, a deal that would add a retail crypto business with about 150,000 users and roughly €350 million in assets under management. The reported discussions followed Meria’s own MiCA CASP authorization in France.

Recent approvals have also extended beyond traditional financial institutions. As crypto.news previously reported, Stripe-owned Bridge secured both MiCA CASP authorization and an Electronic Money Institution license in Luxembourg, enabling the company to provide regulated crypto services across the European Union under the same passporting framework.

MiCA deadline has reshaped Europe’s regulated crypto market

The surge in approvals followed the end of MiCA’s transitional period on July 1, 2026. During that grace period, crypto companies already operating in individual EU countries could continue serving customers while applying for full authorization.

Advertisement

With the transition now complete, firms that failed to obtain a MiCA license must stop onboarding new customers and begin winding down regulated operations within the bloc. ESMA’s updated register provides public confirmation of which providers have completed the authorization process.

MiCA establishes a single regulatory framework covering crypto exchanges, custody providers, portfolio managers, and crypto-asset issuers across the European Union. Under its passporting rules, authorization from one national regulator, such as Luxembourg’s CSSF or Malta’s MFSA, gives firms access to customers across the entire bloc.

The new regulatory environment has already produced visible market changes. As crypto.news reported, Tether’s $186 billion USDT no longer has a MiCA-compliant route to remain on regulated EU exchanges following the July 1 deadline.

Consequently, MiCA-authorized exchanges including Coinbase, Kraken, and Crypto.com have removed USDT trading for European users, ending the stablecoin’s presence on regulated order books despite remaining the world’s largest stablecoin by market capitalization.

Advertisement

For institutional investors and asset managers, ESMA’s expanding register now offers a verified reference point for identifying regulated counterparties operating under the European Union’s unified crypto framework, while passporting continues to reduce the need for firms to secure separate licenses in each member state.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

MicroStrategy Reportedly Sold More Bitcoin, But Market Didn’t React

Published

on

Bitcoin Price Performance

Speculation about another Bitcoin sale from MicroStrategy intensified after an unconfirmed on-chain transfer showed 491 BTC leaving a company-linked wallet on July 1. Neither MicroStrategy nor its Executive Chairman, Michael Saylor, has confirmed any sale.

The rumor spread across X (Twitter) on Friday. Meanwhile, Bitcoin (BTC) traded higher after July 1, suggesting the market easily absorbed the alleged transaction.

Bitcoin Price Performance
Bitcoin Price Performance. source: TradingView

Did Saylor Sell More Bitcoin?

Pseudonymous trader Light flagged the transfer, worth roughly $30 million at current prices. That equals just 0.058% of the 847,363 BTC Strategy reported in its latest SEC disclosure. The stack covers about 4% of bitcoin’s 21 million coin supply.

The timing explains the attention. Strategy adopted a Bitcoin monetization framework plan on June 29, authorizing up to $1.25 billion in tactical sales to fund dividends and buybacks. Its raised 12% STRC preferred dividend took effect on July 1, the same day as the alleged transfer.

Advertisement

The company also completed its first Bitcoin sale since 2022 in late May, offloading 32 BTC to cover preferred stock dividends. Its only earlier sale came in December 2022.

Back then, it sold 704 BTC for $11.8 million to harvest tax losses, then repurchased 810 BTC within days. It had already been rebuilding its cash reserves this year while slowing new purchases.

“Michael Saylor’s Strategy may have just sold 491 BTC on July 1st. The transaction hasn’t been confirmed yet, but if true, this would be one of the first signs of Strategy reducing its Bitcoin position after years of “never sell” narratives…” analyst Crypto Rover amplified the claim in a post.

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

Bitcoin Shrugs Off the Sale Speculation

Bitcoin showed little stress. The coin opened at $61,492 on Friday, up 2.5% from Thursday, and traded for $62,016 as of this writing, up by 1.35% in the last 24 hours. With this, the pioneer crypto is up by over 7% from the July 1 low of $57,800.

Advertisement
Bitcoin Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto
Bitcoin Price Performance. Source: BeInCrypto

The strength tracked a weak June jobs report rather than treasury headlines. It extends a fragile Bitcoin price recovery after the worst month for prices in four years.

Reactions on X (Twitter) split between traders calling the amount a rounding error and others warning repeated sales could sour sentiment.

The calm contrasts with JPMorgan’s recent warning that the new sales policy adds risk to the crypto market. Even so, a fully absorbed $30 million transfer suggests demand currently outweighs those concerns.

Confirmation now rests with Strategy’s own disclosures. The firm reported its May sale within days, so a filing this week would show whether the transfer was a sale, a custody move, or an internal shuffle.

The post MicroStrategy Reportedly Sold More Bitcoin, But Market Didn’t React appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Trump taps Robinhood for new child investment account rollout

Published

on

Trump taps Robinhood for new child investment account rollout

Robinhood has emerged as a key platform in the rollout of the Trump Accounts program, with U.S. Treasury-backed child investment accounts scheduled to begin transfers ahead of the initiative’s July 4 launch.

Summary

  • Robinhood is expected to help roll out the Trump Accounts program ahead of its July 4 launch.
  • Eligible children will receive a $1,000 government contribution, with annual private contributions capped at $5,000.
  • Trump also floated a possible SpaceX stock donation, though neither Elon Musk nor SpaceX has confirmed any plans.

According to information surrounding the program, Robinhood is expected to help facilitate the new accounts, which are designed to give eligible children access to long-term investment portfolios through federally supported savings accounts.

The transfer process is expected to open through the U.S. Treasury before the official launch, bringing brokerage firms into one of the administration’s newest financial initiatives.

Robinhood is expected to handle access to the new accounts

Under the program, children under 18 whose parents have a valid Social Security number will qualify for an account. The federal government will contribute an initial $1,000, while families and other approved contributors may add up to $5,000 per child each year through IRS Form 4547.

The framework brings together the U.S. Treasury, the Internal Revenue Service, brokerage firms responsible for custody, and retail investment companies that will offer account access. Although officials have not formally named Robinhood as the exclusive provider, the company is widely expected to play a central role in making the accounts available to eligible users.

Advertisement

Because Robinhood already combines stock investing with cryptocurrency trading in a single application, the arrangement could eventually allow users to manage government-backed investment accounts alongside their existing brokerage portfolios if regulators permit such functionality. The current Trump Accounts structure, however, does not include cryptocurrency investments or blockchain technology.

Speaking in an interview with CNBC’s Joe Kernen on Thursday, President Donald Trump also said he believes Elon Musk could contribute SpaceX stock to the Trump Accounts initiative, although he acknowledged he had not recently spoken with the billionaire.

Trump added that business leaders including Michael Dell and Micron have shown support for the children’s investment program. Neither Musk nor SpaceX has announced any plan to donate shares, leaving Trump’s comments as his expectation rather than a confirmed commitment.

Following those remarks, SpaceX ticker SPCX recovered from an intraday low near $155 to close about 3% higher at roughly $162 on July 3 as buyers returned after early selling pressure, as previously reported by crypto.news.

Advertisement

Regulators continue separating traditional investments from digital assets

While the accounts focus on conventional investment products, their launch comes as U.S. regulators continue defining the legal boundaries between securities and digital assets. The program adds another example of regulated custodial investment products becoming part of mainstream financial services, even though cryptocurrencies are not included in the current design.

Research previously published by Messari has identified retail investment applications as an important entry point for individuals investing in risk assets. If brokerages integrate the new accounts into existing investing platforms, regulated long-term investing could become more accessible to younger users through familiar financial apps.

The political backdrop surrounding the initiative remains active. As previously reported by crypto.news, President Trump’s 2025 financial disclosures showed at least $1.4 billion in crypto-related income tied to ventures including his memecoin and World Liberty Financial, prompting continued ethics discussions while lawmakers negotiate the CLARITY Act. Trump later denied knowledge of those earnings and said there was “nothing illegal” about them.

Although the Trump Accounts program currently excludes digital assets, brokerage participation and ongoing regulatory work could influence future discussions about how government-backed investment products and regulated digital asset offerings coexist within the U.S. financial system.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

SOL Rebounds as Solana Memecoins and Prediction Markets Spike

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Solana’s SOL token climbed to a level not seen in more than 30 days, briefly trading around $83, and the move is drawing attention because it doesn’t look like a simple altcoin sympathy rally. Instead, market data points to a mix of rising tokenized-asset activity on Solana, renewed memecoin momentum, and improving flows tied to stablecoin liquidity.

The question now for traders is whether this renewed bid can push SOL back through the $90 area—or whether the market is already cooling off as leverage comes off the table. Recent derivative and on-chain indicators suggest enthusiasm may be more selective than it was earlier in the week.

Key takeaways

  • SOL hit a 30-day high near $83, showing signs of decoupling from the broader altcoin market’s weakness.
  • Tokenized trading activity on Solana accelerated as cumulative tokenized stock transfers surpassed $10 billion around June 23.
  • Memecoins and prediction-market activity boosted short-term attention, but leveraged positioning cooled quickly.
  • Futures annualized funding fell to about 3% on Friday from an 11% peak earlier, implying less appetite for chasing gains to $90.

Tokenized assets bring a new tailwind to Solana

One of the clearest narratives behind SOL’s strength is the renewed growth in tokenized asset activity on the Solana network. According to data referenced from RWA.xyz, Solana’s tokenized assets rose to a record-high $3.5 billion on Wednesday—up from $2.7 billion about one month earlier.

The same dataset also points to what’s driving that expansion. The article cites tokenization products related to corporate credit and market indexes such as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-100. In addition, RWA.xyz data shows Solana leading the tokenized industry by active addresses, with 294,274, compared with Ethereum’s 204,955.

On the “why it matters” side for investors and builders: when tokenized assets expand, it generally increases demand for on-chain infrastructure—settlement, custody, trading venues, and related DeFi rails. Even if tokenized flows don’t translate immediately into SOL spot buying, they can reinforce the perception that Solana is capturing practical usage, not only speculative demand.

Advertisement

Memecoin revival and ecosystem features support short-term momentum

Beyond tokenization, the rally also appears to have been helped by a memecoin resurgence. The article highlights the Sunday airdrop of The Black Bull (ANSEM), which launched on Pump.fun. ANSEM reportedly reached a market capitalization of $60 million by Tuesday, with the developer directing roughly 65% of the supply to Ansem’s public wallet; the launch rollout reportedly involved about 74,000 addresses over the initial three days. The distribution is described as lacking full transparency.

That kind of attention can matter because memecoin activity often spurs retail trading and related network usage—especially on ecosystems where token launches and trading are tightly integrated. In this case, multiple Solana memecoins gained, but the article notes that the biggest winner was the Pump.fun platform token (PUMP). PUMP added about 27% on the week, returning to the top 100 by market capitalization and reaching an estimated $630 million valuation. ANSEM itself reportedly extended gains on Friday, reaching an all-time high market capitalization of $112 million.

Alongside memecoins, the article also ties SOL’s renewed interest to prediction-market functionality. It cites the integration of a “World prediction markets” experience into the Phantom wallet, reporting nearly $890,000 in total value locked over two days, framed as an effort to compete with Polymarket during the World Cup betting cycle. It also mentions that Jupiter has prediction markets under beta testing, with a reference to a June 29 launch.

Leverage cools: derivatives signal traders are less willing to chase

If tokenized-asset growth and memecoins helped ignite the move, derivatives data suggests the market is no longer as eager to press higher prices. The article points to a sharp decline in bullish leveraged appetite after Wednesday, when SOL rose above $75 for the first time in 30 days.

Advertisement

Specifically, the SOL perpetual futures annualized funding rate fell to 3% on Friday from an 11% peak just two days earlier. The piece references Laevitas for those funding figures, and notes that under “neutral conditions,” the funding rate should typically sit in a range from 6% to 12% to balance the capital cost.

That shift is important for traders because funding rates often reflect whether longs are crowding the trade. A cooling funding environment can mean new longs are less willing to pay up for exposure to SOL, which can reduce the momentum needed to sustain a breakout attempt—especially if spot demand doesn’t keep pace.

In other words, the market may be congratulating itself on earlier gains while becoming more cautious about a further push toward $90. The article’s framing emphasizes that investors may not want to bet on SOL widening its performance gap over other altcoins based solely on temporary memecoin-driven attention. Without sustained blockchain activity that converts into durable demand—rather than short-lived hype—there may be fewer reasons for leverage to build again quickly.

What to watch next for SOL and Solana activity

For SOL to realistically challenge the $90 zone, the next signal to track is whether the tokenized-asset expansion and broader on-chain usage can offset any fading retail-driven flows. If tokenized trading volume continues to grow and prediction-market participation sustains, the narrative supporting SOL may broaden beyond memes. Conversely, if leveraged sentiment stays subdued and funding remains below the levels typically associated with healthy upside positioning, SOL may consolidate even if it remains resilient versus the rest of the altcoin market.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Shielded Labs warns Ironwood delay could disrupt Zcash upgrade

Published

on

Shielded Labs warns Ironwood delay could disrupt Zcash upgrade

Shielded Labs has raised the possibility of delaying Zcash’s Ironwood network upgrade, citing readiness concerns among exchanges, mining pools and wallet providers ahead of the planned late July activation.

Summary

  • Shielded Labs says Zcash’s Ironwood upgrade may be delayed as ecosystem participants need more preparation time.
  • Exchanges, wallets and mining pools are simultaneously migrating from zcashd to the new Z3 software stack.
  • Ironwood is designed to secure Zcash’s shielded supply after the Orchard “infinity” bug was disclosed.

According to a July 3 X post on the Zcash community forum by Shielded Labs executive director Jason McGee, the network is attempting to complete two major changes at the same time. Alongside Ironwood, infrastructure providers are also expected to replace Zcash’s long-running node and wallet software, zcashd, with a new software suite known as the Z3 stack.

McGee said feedback from ecosystem participants showed mixed levels of preparedness. While some operators believe they can complete the migration before the planned activation window, others have indicated they will require additional time to deploy and test the new software. He added that no decision has been made to postpone Ironwood.

Advertisement

Infrastructure migration remains the biggest hurdle

As part of the transition, Zcash is retiring zcashd, which has long been used by exchanges, wallets and other network operators to connect to the blockchain and process transactions. Its replacement consists of Zebra for running network nodes, Zaino for blockchain data services and Zallet for wallet functionality.

According to Zcash’s official migration guidance, some features available in zcashd will not have direct replacements, meaning operators may need to modify their own infrastructure before switching to the new stack. McGee also said both Zallet and Zaino remain under development and are not yet considered production-ready, making deployment timelines uncertain for some ecosystem participants.

The overlap between the software migration and Ironwood activation has created a practical challenge. Delaying Ironwood could extend uncertainty around Zcash’s shielded supply, while proceeding without sufficient preparation could leave exchanges, mining pools, and wallet providers struggling to complete the migration safely.

Advertisement

Ironwood is designed to secure Zcash’s shielded supply

Ironwood was proposed after researchers identified an “infinity” bug in Orchard, Zcash’s primary shielded transaction pool. According to the development team, the vulnerability could theoretically have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of counterfeit ZEC inside Orchard without immediate detection. Developers also said they found no evidence that the flaw had ever been exploited.

Because Orchard’s privacy protections prevent anyone from proving that no counterfeit coins were created, Ironwood introduces a replacement shielded pool and closes Orchard to new activity. Funds leaving Orchard would pass through an accounting checkpoint that prevents more ZEC from exiting than originally entered, allowing users to verify that the circulating supply stays within the protocol’s intended limits.

Earlier this year, developers temporarily disabled Orchard transactions through an emergency network update after disclosing the vulnerability while work on Ironwood continued. The upcoming upgrade forms the permanent solution intended to restore confidence in the network’s shielded supply.

Meanwhile, Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox said recent security reviews have not uncovered any additional serious vulnerabilities in the new implementation. He added that developers are continuing to verify the upgraded system before Ironwood is activated, while discussions remain ongoing over whether additional preparation time is needed for ecosystem participants before the network upgrade proceeds.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

A 12-Month Rule Could Put Nigel Farage’s Crypto Lobbying in Trouble

Published

on

Tether Market Cap Amiong Crypto's Top Three. Source: Coingecko

A formal complaint has asked Parliament’s standards watchdog to examine whether Reform UK leader Nigel Farage breached lobbying rules. This comes after Farage received donations from billionaire Christopher Harborne, who reportedly holds a 12% stake in Tether’s USDT stablecoin.

Labour MP Phil Brickell filed the complaint on July 2. He asked Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Daniel Greenberg to review Farage’s private meeting with Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey in September 2025.

The Rule Behind the Farage Crypto Lobbying Complaint

Official UK parliamentary guidance prohibits MPs from approaching ministers or officials on behalf of recent benefactors.

Advertisement

“Paid lobbying is prohibited. An MP who has received a benefit such as hospitality, a gift or payment must not for 12 months after receipt engage in … any approach to a minister, other MP or public official which would provide (or seek to provide) a financial or material benefit for the person or organisation which provided them with that … payment.”

The restriction is younger than it looks. The British Parliament doubled the ban from 6 to 12 months in March 2023, after Owen Paterson resigned in 2021. The standards committee found he lobbied for two firms paying him more than £100,000 ($133,500) a year.

Brickell, chair of Parliament’s anti-corruption group, reported Farage to Commissioner Daniel Greenberg. This is according to a report by The Guardian,

“This is not simply a debate about cryptocurrency. It is about whether an MP who has received millions from one individual should be lobbying for policies that could increase the value and profitability of that donor’s investments.”

Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens

How the Timeline Tests the Rule

Farage reportedly accepted a £5 million gift from Harborne before the July 2024 general election. Greenberg is already examining whether that gift should have been declared, according to the BBC.

Advertisement

Farage also received two £25,000 donations from Harborne in January 2025 and February 2026. Reform UK received a further £15 million from the same donor.

The January 2025 donation is central to the lobbying complaint. Around eight months later, in September 2025, Farage met Bailey privately.

During that meeting, Farage reportedly urged the Bank of England to scrap its digital pound plans.

Nine months later, the Bank dropped stablecoin holding caps in favor of a £40 billion ($53.4 billion) issuance ceiling. Industry voices had warned the £20,000 ($26,700) cap could make businesses unworkable.

Advertisement

Farage has since claimed credit for the softer approach, the Telegraph reported.

That meeting fell inside the 12-month restriction period following the January donation. Brickell’s complaint asks whether Farage’s approach to the Bank could have provided a financial or material benefit to Harborne, given his reported Tether stake.

Tether Market Cap Amiong Crypto's Top Three. Source: Coingecko
Tether Market Cap Among Crypto’s Top Three. Source: Coingecko

A second Labour MP, Joe Powell, has asked Bailey for details of the meeting.

Denials and No Findings Yet

Reform UK dismissed the claims entirely. Farage and Harborne maintain the gift was unconditional, and the Bank of England called the September meeting a routine engagement.

Advertisement

Greenberg is separately investigating whether Farage should have declared the £5 million gift, per the BBC. He has not yet said whether the lobbying complaint will trigger a formal inquiry. No wrongdoing has been established.

If a breach were found, sanctions range from an apology to suspension. Paterson faced a recommended 30 sitting-day suspension before quitting Parliament.

Farage’s own crypto exposure is growing. He made a £2 million Bitcoin (BTC) purchase in April. Meanwhile, the UK now bans crypto political donations outright.

Greenberg opening a formal inquiry could decide how firmly Parliament polices the 12-month rule in the crypto era.

Advertisement

The post A 12-Month Rule Could Put Nigel Farage’s Crypto Lobbying in Trouble appeared first on BeInCrypto.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

SOL Tops $83 As Solana Network Activity Surges

Published

on

SOL Tops $83 As Solana Network Activity Surges

Key takeaways:

  • Solana’s tokenized assets and memecoin revival drove SOL to a 30-day high at $83.
  • Bullish leveraged appetite cooled sharply, suggesting traders are hesitant to bet on further gains to $90.

Solana’s SOL token jumped to its highest mark in over 30 days on Friday at $83, marking a decoupling from the altcoin market. SOL’s rally gained steam from a surge in tokenized trading volume on Solana, inflows of stablecoin liquidity, and an unexpected comeback in memecoin activity. Can SOL reclaim the $90 level?

Total altcoin market capitalization, USD (left) vs. SOL/USD (right). Source: TradingView

SOL’s bullish momentum ignited on June 23, coinciding with cumulative tokenized stock transfers on Solana surpassing $10 billion. The launch of SpaceX shares trading by Backpack propelled Solana’s decentralized finance (DeFi) utilization. In contrast, the broader altcoin market extended its downtrend, hitting the lowest level since December 2023.

30-day tokenized assets net flows ex-stablecoins, USD. Source: RWA.xyz

Advertisement

Tokenized assets on the Solana network surged to a record-high $3.5 billion on Wednesday, up from $2.7 billion one month prior. The recent boost came from corporate credit tokens and stock market indexes, such as the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-100. According to RWA.xyz data, Solana leads with 294,274 active addresses in the tokenized industry, followed by Ethereum with 204,955.

Memecoins, prediction markets surge may push SOL toward $90

The airdrop of The Black Bull (ANSEM) memecoin on Sunday re-ignited interest in the sector. The token, launched on Pump.fun, reached a $60 million market capitalization on Tuesday. The anonymous developer directed some 65% of the supply to the crypto influencer Ansem’s public wallet. The distribution lacked transparency, but involved 74,000 addresses over the initial 3 days.

Top 7-day performances of Solana tokens. Source: CoinRanking

Multiple memecoins on Solana surged on the back of the memecoin airdrop, but the biggest winner was the Pump.fun platform token (PUMP). The 27% weekly gains were enough to send PUMP back into the top-100 crypto rankings, with a $630 million market capitalization. ANSEM memecoin extended its gains on Friday, reaching an all-time high market capitalization of $112 million.

Advertisement

The launch of World prediction markets integrated on Phantom wallet has created expectations for increased Solana activity. The project gathered nearly $890,000 in total value locked in two days and aims to compete with the extremely successful Polymarket amid the World Cup betting frenzy. Jupiter has also unveiled its prediction markets under beta test on June 29.

Related: US dominates Polymarket political bets despite geoblock–Report

SOL perpetual futures annualized funding rate. Source: Laevitas

The appetite for bullish leveraged positions has vastly declined since Wednesday, when SOL’s price crossed above $75 for the first time in 30 days. SOL futures annualized funding rate dropped to 3% on Friday from an 11% peak two days prior. Under neutral conditions, the indicator should range from 6% to 12% to offset the capital cost.

Advertisement

Investors are not comfortable betting on a SOL rally to $90 merely on the back of a temporary memecoin demand surge. Unless there is sustainable demand for blockchain activity, there are no apparent drivers for SOL to further widen its performance gap relative to the remaining altcoins.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025