Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Crypto World

OpenClaw enforces zero-crypto rule after scam fallout

Published

on

OpenClaw enforces zero-crypto rule after scam fallout

OpenClaw creator Peter Steinberger confirmed that any mention of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies on the project’s Discord server can lead to removal.

Summary

  • OpenClaw enforces blanket ban on all crypto mentions in Discord.
  • Rule follows $CLAWD scam that briefly hit $16M market cap.
  • User banned for Bitcoin timing reference later reinstated.

A user was blocked Saturday for referencing Bitcoin block height as a timing mechanism in a multi-agent benchmark. This prompted Steinberger to defend the platform’s “no crypto mention whatsoever” policy.

The strict stance stems from a scam that happened during OpenClaw’s rebrand. When Steinberger received a trademark notice forcing a name change, scammers seized abandoned social media handles in the window between releasing old accounts and claiming new ones.

Advertisement

The attackers promoted a Solana-based token called $CLAWD that surged to approximately $16 million in market capitalization before collapsing over 90% after Steinberger publicly denied involvement.

User blocked for Bitcoin reference in technical discussion

The banned user shared their experience on X, explaining they were removed from OpenClaw’s Discord simply for mentioning Bitcoin block height in a technical context.

Steinberger responded that members had accepted “strict server rules” upon joining and that the community maintains a blanket ban on crypto mentions.

Steinberger later agreed to restore the user’s access, asking them to email their username so he could re-add them to the server.

The policy applies to all cryptocurrency references, not just promotional content or token discussions.

Advertisement

Technical use cases like block height timing mechanisms fall under the same ban as speculative token mentions.

$CLAWD token collapse triggered security crackdown

Trouble began when Steinberger received a trademark notice related to OpenClaw’s original name.

Scammers moved quickly to grab abandoned social media accounts during the transition, using them to promote the fraudulent $CLAWD token on Solana.

Advertisement

The token rocketed to roughly $16 million in market capitalization within hours as traders assumed it was an official OpenClaw launch.

Early buyers accused Steinberger of planning a pump-and-dump when the token collapsed more than 90% following his public denial of involvement.

Steinberger warned users he would never launch a cryptocurrency and that any token claiming association with him was fraudulent. The incident prompted the strict no-crypto policy now enforced across OpenClaw’s Discord channels.

Security researchers later identified hundreds of exposed OpenClaw instances online and dozens of malicious plugins, many designed to target crypto traders.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Democrats Question CFTC Chair on Insider Trading in Prediction Markets

Published

on

Government, CFTC, Trading, Prediction Markets

The seven House members may have affirmed the commission‘s authority over prediction markets, but asked questions about its inaction on insider trading.

Seven members of the US House of Representatives sent a letter to Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chair Michael Selig, asking for information on the agency’s inaction on insider trading on prediction markets and event contracts related to war and conflicts.

In a Monday letter, the seven US lawmakers said that the CFTC had the authority under the Commodities Exchange Act “to apply its rules and regulations for the purpose of preventing evasion of the [act’s] underlying swap provisions.” The statement signaled that the representatives affirmed Selig’s position that the commission had jurisdiction over prediction markets.

Advertisement

However, the House members expressed concerns about how the CFTC was policing “morally obscene” event contracts, including those on US military actions in Iran and Venezuela — in those cases, there were suspicious trades related to the timing and outcomes of US military involvement. 

“Such corrupt trades deserve swift and decisive oversight,” said the letter. “Allowing these contracts to persist raises troubling concerns about the Commission’s desire and capacity to fulfill a global regulatory role.”

Government, CFTC, Trading, Prediction Markets
Source: Representative Seth Moulton

The legal battles over regulating prediction market platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket are being waged both at a federal and state level. Several US state gaming authorities have filed lawsuits alleging that the companies are illegally offering sports bets, while the CFTC, under Selig, claims that the event contracts on the platform amount to swaps and fall under its federal regulations.

The seven House members requested that Selig respond to their six questions by April 15.

Related: Polymarket bags 97% of onchain prediction market fees after pricing overhaul

Advertisement

In one of the most recent legal decisions, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling blocking New Jersey gaming authorities from filing enforcement actions against Kalshi. Two out of three circuit judges said that the company had a ”reasonable chance of success” in arguing that federal commodities laws preempted state authorities.

CFTC enforcement director says agency is “watching” for insider trading

The Monday letter followed CFTC enforcement director David Miller responding to concerns over insider trading, which has also resulted in legislation proposed by Democrats. According to Miller, the commission would only prosecute instances “against those who tip or trade with misappropriated information,” but not dedicate resources to “trivial” cases.

Magazine: All 21 million Bitcoin is at risk from quantum computers

Advertisement