Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

SEC’s Crypto Mom to Enter Law School, Signaling Regulatory Shift

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Regent University School of Law announced that Hester M. Peirce, a two-term commissioner of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and a longtime figure in crypto policy, will join the faculty as an associate professor beginning in November. The appointment comes as the SEC’s leadership landscape remains unsettled and as federal regulators weigh how to realign oversight for digital assets within a changing legislative and enforcement environment.

Regent’s notice situates Peirce within the law school’s expanding emphasis on federal litigation, securities regulation and digital assets. Her SEC tenure officially ended in June 2025, but commissioners may continue serving for up to about 18 months after terms expire if replacements are not named, according to the agency’s rules. Peirce first joined the SEC in January 2018, after confirmation following her nomination by President Donald Trump in December 2017. She was later confirmed for a second term in 2020. Earlier in her career, Peirce was nominated by President Barack Obama to fill a Republican seat on the commission in 2015, but the nomination did not advance in the Senate at that time.

Regent communications indicate that Peirce’s teaching focus will include federal litigation, securities regulation and digital assets, signaling a constructive bridge between regulatory practice and academic inquiry. The move underscores a broader trend of regulators transitioning into academic roles to shape future professionals’ understanding of policy and compliance in the crypto space.

Key takeaways

  • Hester M. Peirce will join Regent University School of Law as an associate professor, with teaching to begin in November, according to Regent’s notice.
  • The SEC term for Peirce expired in June 2025; commissioners may serve for approximately 18 months after term expiration if not replaced, a policy that can affect regulatory continuity during leadership transitions.
  • Peirce’s departure contributes to a constrained leadership slate at the SEC, where Caroline Crenshaw’s seat remains vacant following her January departure; the commission would be left with two Republican members (Mark Uyeda and Chair Paul Atkins) once Peirce exits, given the current membership configuration.
  • Across the two primary crypto regulators—the SEC and the CFTC—staffing gaps persist. The CFTC, led by Chair Michael S. Selig, currently has a single commissioner, highlighting ongoing debates over who should supervise digital-asset markets.
  • Legislative momentum around a digital asset market structure, including the CLARITY Act, could reallocate certain powers from the SEC to the CFTC, shaping the trajectory of enforcement and market oversight.
  • Nomination dynamics under the current administration remain pivotal for restoring full regulatory capacity and for signaling the administration’s regulatory posture toward crypto firms, banks, and investors.

Academic transition amid regulatory vacancies

Peirce’s move to Regent comes at a moment when the crypto policy debate in Washington is characterized by competing priorities: enforcement clarity, investor protection, market integrity, and technological innovation. As a two-term commissioner who led the SEC’s crypto task force and earned the informal moniker “Crypto Mom” for her approach to digital-asset issues, Peirce has been at the center of policy debates about whether tokens constitute securities, how to apply existing securities laws to novel financial instruments, and how to balance innovation with investor safeguards. Regent’s programmatic emphasis on federal litigation and securities regulation, augmented by a focus on digital assets, suggests an intent to embed practical regulatory perspectives within the law school’s curriculum. For institutions and compliance teams, the appointment signals heightened attention to regulatory theory and real-world enforcement considerations as new graduates enter finance and technology sectors.

From a compliance perspective, Peirce’s academic appointment could influence conversations about how future financial institutions assess compliance risk, structure internal control frameworks, and engage with policymakers. It also highlights the importance of jurisprudence and standardized regulatory interpretation as markets evolve. The move is not a mere personnel change; it reflects a bridge between policy formation and legal education that can inform how market participants interpret regulatory expectations, draft internal policies, and prepare for evolving enforcement priorities.

Advertisement

Vacancies in the SEC and CFTC: implications for enforcement and governance

The staffing picture at the SEC remains incomplete. The departure of a sitting commissioner creates a narrower political and regulatory footprint at a moment when crypto policy is under active consideration in Congress and in the courts. Crenshaw’s earlier exit in January left the agency with a reduced complement of commissioners; according to the agency’s own disclosures, vacancies may extend for months while nominations work through the Senate. As Peirce winds down her term, the SEC would be left with only two Republican commissioners, alongside a Democratic minority, a configuration that can influence the Commission’s voting dynamics on nuanced policy questions and enforcement actions.

Similarly, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission faces parallel staffing challenges. Michael S. Selig remains the chair and, at present, the agency’s leadership operates with a limited number of members. This convergence of vacancies at the SEC and CFTC has immediate practical implications for regulatory tempo, rulemaking, and cooperative efforts on cross-cutting issues such as digital-asset market structure and investor protection.

Industry observers have noted that regulatory leadership matters not only for immediate enforcement actions but also for the long-term signaling of the United States’ approach to crypto markets. With the nomination process potentially slow in the current political climate, market participants and institutional clients must plan for a period of governance uncertainty, during which policy direction—particularly on crypto asset classification, registration, and reporting requirements—may lack a clear, unified voice from Washington.

Regulatory reorganization and the path to a unified market framework

A central policy topic in this period is the ongoing discussion around the digital asset market structure. The CLARITY Act, and related legislative efforts in Congress, are viewed by many as attempts to delineate and consolidate authority over crypto markets. Proponents argue that a clearer allocation of powers between the SEC and CFTC would reduce regulatory fragmentation and bring more predictable oversight for market participants—especially those operating cross-border and those seeking to coordinate banking services with stablecoins and digital-asset settlements.

Advertisement

Under this framework, the balance of oversight could shift toward the CFTC for certain market-structure matters, including the governance of crypto spot and derivatives markets. At the same time, the SEC’s role in registration, disclosure, and investor protection remains significant, particularly for projects that might be construed as securities offerings. The evolving dynamics underscore the importance for market participants to monitor both rulemaking activity and legislative developments, as well as any potential realignment of enforcement priorities.

Notably, the current administration has signaled a willingness to recalibrate interd- agency coordination. In practice, that could mean more explicit cooperation between the SEC and CFTC on compliance expectations for exchanges, wallets, and asset issuers, along with streamlined processes for cross-border firms seeking to operate in the United States. Observers should also watch how this alignment interacts with broader regulatory regimes, including anti-money-laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements and licensing regimes that influence institutional onboarding and banking relationships for crypto firms.

In coverage beyond the agency level, industry analyses have highlighted that these regulatory tensions—and the potential reallocation of authority—carry practical implications for risk management, legal budgeting, and internal control design within financial institutions, exchanges and liquidity providers. The interplay between evolving law, enforcement discretion, and business models will shape how firms allocate resources to regulatory compliance programs, internal audits, and ongoing policy engagement with regulators and lawmakers. Cointelegraph has documented how the regulatory posture has shifted under the current administration, contributing to an atmosphere of recalibration across U.S. crypto oversight.

Closing perspective: what to watch next

As Regent welcomes Peirce and as vacancies persist at the SEC and CFTC, the next several months will be critical for determining the pace and direction of U.S. crypto regulation. The interplay between academic engagement, regulatory staffing, and legislative advance will influence not only enforcement priorities but also how market participants structure compliance programs, partner with banks, and evolve governance practices in line with evolving legal standards. Key watch points include nominee progress in the Senate, any shifts in enforcement posture tied to leadership changes, and the continued articulation of a coherent market-structure framework that clarifies regulatory responsibilities across securities and futures regimes.

Advertisement

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Fairshake PAC’s $20M Investment Pays off in Three US State Primaries

Published

on

Fairshake PAC’s $20M Investment Pays off in Three US State Primaries

Political action committees (PACs) aligned with and funded by the cryptocurrency industry notched a series of wins in three US state primaries on Tuesday, potentially setting a precedent for the 2026 midterm elections.

The Fairshake PAC and its affiliates poured a combined $20 million into supportive media for the races. The committee, largely funded by crypto companies Ripple Labs and Coinbase, is behind the Defend American Jobs PAC in supporting Republican candidates and Protect Progress PAC for Democrats considered to be “pro-crypto.”

Four Republican candidates and one Democrat won their respective primaries for US Senate and House of Representatives seats in Georgia and Kentucky, while one Alabama Republican will go to a runoff election.

“Fairshake’s 6-0 sweep tonight was a clear victory for pro-crypto leaders across the country,” Fairshake spokesperson Geoff Vetter told Cointelegraph. He said:

Advertisement

“This powerful bipartisan mandate is being heard across America from Georgia to Alabama to Kentucky.”

According to Federal Election Commission filings, Protect Progress spent more than $4.2 million to support Jasmine Clark, a Georgia representative running in the state’s 13th Congressional district. Defend American Jobs reported similar expenditures for media to support Republican candidates: $455,000 for Clay Fuller in Georgia’s 14th district, $709,000 for Houston Gaines in Georgia’s 10th district, $431,000 for Jim Kingston in Georgia’s 1st district and $7.2 million for Andy Barr for Kentucky’s US Senate seat.

Barry Moore, who was supported with $7.4 million from Defend American Jobs in his run for Alabama’s US Senate seat, will head to a runoff against state Attorney General Steve Marshall and Republican candidate Jared Hudson, after none of the three secured a majority of the vote in the primary.

Source: Jasmine Clark

Fairshake and its affiliates, backed by the crypto industry, are expected to spend millions of dollars in 2026 to “oppose anti-crypto politicians and support pro-crypto leaders,” according to a spokesperson in January. The company reported holding a $193 million war chest, far surpassing its 2024 expenditures of $130 million on media and ads to support congressional candidates.

Related: Crypto PACs spend $7.2M to support candidates in 5 US states ahead of elections

Advertisement

Despite the multimillion-dollar expenditures, the crypto-backed PAC hasn’t always been successful in swaying enough voters before a key election or primary. Fairshake reportedly spent $8 million opposing Illinois Lieutenant Governor Juliana Stratton in her US Senate primary, but she beat other candidates with more than 40% of the vote.

Coming Texas run-off seen again testing crypto PAC support

Protect Progress has ramped up spending on supportive media for Democratic candidate Christian Menefee, running to unseat incumbent Al Green in Texas’ 18th Congressional District. 

Representative Al Green addressing the House Financial Services Committee in March. Source: Al Green

According to FEC filings as of Tuesday, the PAC spent more than $4.1 million to support Menefee. It also reported spending more than $2.8 million on media to oppose Green, who has expressed anti-crypto views and voting records against the payment stablecoin bill GENIUS Act and digital asset market structure bill, the CLARITY Act.

Protect Progress reportedly spent more than $1.5 million opposing Green ahead of a March primary against Menefee, but neither candidate secured a majority of the vote, triggering next Tuesday’s runoff.

Advertisement

Magazine: 5 tech predictions the mainstream media got horribly wrong

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Rallies Back Into Range Even As Investors Spot Risks

Published

on

Bitcoin Rallies Back Into Range Even As Investors Spot Risks

Key takeaways:

  • $2 billion in spot Bitcoin ETF outflows spark downside fears, but this metric is typically backward-looking.
  • A sustained discount on stablecoins in China signals broad capital flight from cryptocurrency markets.

Bitcoin (BTC) reclaimed $77,000 on Wednesday as broader risk markets saw modest relief after Brent crude prices retreated below $108. However, large outflows from spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have forced traders to reassess the odds of further downside risk, especially amid lingering fears of a global economic downturn.

Russell 2000 Index futures (left) vs Bitcoin/USD (right). Source: TradingView

Bitcoin’s price action closely tracked the US small-cap stock index, hinting that macroeconomic factors are currently driving the move. The Russell 2000 Index excludes the 1,000 largest companies, shielding it from the heavy concentration of tech stocks.

Outflows from US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs totaled $2 billion in the seven days leading up to Tuesday, sparking fears of a deeper price correction below $75,000.

Advertisement

US-listed spot Bitcoin ETF daily net flows, USD. Source: SoSoValue

Traders are now turning their attention to the artificial intelligence sector, with Nvidia (NVDA US) scheduled to drop its quarterly results after the US market close. According to Yahoo Finance, investors fear that competition from AMD (AMD US), Amazon (AMZN US) Google (GOOG US) are closing in.

Stablecoin flows in China reveal weak demand for crypto

Regardless of Wednesday’s Nvidia earnings, stablecoin flows in China reveal a distinct lack of investor appetite for cryptocurrencies.

USD stablecoin premium/discount relative to USD/CNY rate. Source: OKX

Advertisement

Stablecoins traded at a 0.4% discount against the official Chinese yuan-US dollar foreign exchange rate, signaling heightened demand to exit crypto markets. Under neutral conditions, the metric typically sustains a 0.3% to 0.8% premium due to strict Chinese capital controls and the regulatory risks faced during arbitrage trades.

Part of this market-wide risk aversion can be pinned to stubborn oil prices and surging US Treasury yields. Selling pressure on government bonds indicates growing concern over the Federal Reserve’s ability to head off an economic recession without triggering major currency dilution. 

Related: Bitcoin lost its hold on $80K, but three events may send it back sooner than markets expect

Elevated energy costs are driving resilient inflationary pressures, ultimately limiting the central bank’s ability to deploy expansionary monetary measures.

Advertisement

Demand for downside Bitcoin price protection signal lack of confidence

Strength in tech stocks masks broader economic risks. Meta (META US) announced a 10% global workforce reduction, while Cloudflare (NET US) is eliminating 20% of its staff. On Wednesday, Intuit’s (INTU US) CEO confirmed the company is laying off 17% of its employees.

Bitcoin options put-to-call volume ratio at Deribit. Source: Laevitas

The volume of Bitcoin put (sell) options traded on Deribit outpaced equivalent call (buy) instruments by 42% on Tuesday as traders sought downside protection. This metric has completely retraced from the previous week’s 56% call option advantage, seen when Bitcoin flirted with $82,000. In essence, traders are reacting to recent price movements rather than anticipating them.

Macroeconomic trends and high-stakes AI earnings forecasts continue to dominate the news flow, making it difficult for Bitcoin to regain sustained bullish momentum. If Nvidia’s results fail to meet investor expectations, Bitcoin could retest the $75,000 level. Still, the mere $2 billion spot Bitcoin ETF outflows are backward-looking and unlikely to indicate structural bearish expectations.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

BlockDAG and ZKP funds allegedly rerouted into marketing, ZachXBT says

Published

on

Crypto fear index increases as traders dump XRP, Solana and DeFi bets

On-chain investigator ZachXBT says at least about $25 million in presale funds tied to BlockDAG Network and ZKP appear to have been mixed together and routed toward influencer promotions and gambling-related marketing linked to Gurhan Kiziloz.

Summary

  • ZachXBT alleges BlockDAG and ZKP presale money was used interchangeably rather than ring-fenced by project.
  • He says roughly $25 million flowed through pooled wallets, cross-chain bridges and exchanges before reaching addresses used for KOL and streamer payments.
  • The warning explicitly tells investors to avoid BlockDAG, ZKP and Spartans, a gambling platform ZachXBT has repeatedly linked to Gurhan Kiziloz.

ZachXBT has accused the operators behind BlockDAG Network and ZKP of pooling presale funds and redirecting part of that money into promotional payments for influencers, streamers and gambling-related marketing instead of limiting it to the purposes investors were led to expect.

In his post, he says on-chain tracing shows signs that at least about $25 million from the two presales was used interchangeably across multiple wallets before being bridged, sent to exchanges and then routed onward to addresses associated with promotional payouts for Spartans and related entities tied to Gurhan Kiziloz.

Advertisement

The allegation matters because the core claim is not merely sloppy treasury management but undisclosed reuse of investor money across separate ventures. According to RootData, ZachXBT had already alleged that Kiziloz was the real force behind BlockDAG and that the project’s public-facing leadership functioned more as nominal cover than actual control.

Fund flows under scrutiny

The new claim builds on months of scrutiny around BlockDAG’s unusually long-running presale and opaque cash movements. In an earlier public warning on X, ZachXBT said the token sale had run for more than two years while presale funds were being off-ramped through Middle Eastern OTC desks as Kiziloz spent heavily elsewhere.

Other outlets have echoed parts of that broader picture. CryptoRank reported in October 2025 that ZachXBT alleged Gurhan Kiziloz was the real co-founder behind BlockDAG and that millions in presale money were funneled through OTC brokers, while CryptoPotato later summarized allegations that BlockDAG had taken in more than $300 million from retail investors using aggressive promotional tactics and unrealistic return claims.

What is newly significant here is the allegation that ZKP was not separate in financial practice even if it was separate in fundraising language. ZachXBT says the presale materials for both BlockDAG and ZKP did not disclose that the funds could be used to support other businesses, and he argues the wallet behavior suggests exactly that.

Advertisement

Spartans and investor warnings

ZachXBT also identified specific addresses, including what he describes as the Spartans KOL payment wallet and the BlockDAG / ZKP presale wallet cluster, as part of the flow of funds he traced through the system. His conclusion is blunt: investors should stay away from BlockDAG, ZKP and Spartans.

That warning fits a broader pattern in his prior reporting. Binance Square summarized earlier allegations that Kiziloz was behind both Spartans and BlockDAG and that more than $300 million had been raised from retail investors through social-media-heavy promotion and misleading partnership claims.

Retail frustration is also not theoretical. Complaints in public communities such as Reddit and Facebook groups have continued to focus on withdrawal delays, unclear fund use and skepticism over whether the money raised was ever segregated in the first place.

Advertisement

The central problem is obvious enough: if separate presales were marketed as distinct opportunities but the cash was pooled and then used to pay external promoters for a gambling ecosystem, that is not clever treasury management. It is the kind of conduct that makes every “community-driven” presale look like a transfer mechanism from retail wallets into a private marketing machine.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Raoul Pal sees crypto hitting $100T in a decade

Published

on

Raoul Pal sees crypto hitting $100T in a decade

Raoul Pal says AI and crypto could add $100T to global GDP within a decade.

Summary

  • Real Vision CEO Raoul Pal forecasts crypto will grow from roughly $2.7 trillion today to $100 trillion within a decade, driven by AI convergence.
  • Pal argues AI adoption is accelerating faster than the internet era, describing the current moment as equivalent to “Metcalfe’s law squared.”
  • He calls crypto the ownership layer for the AI economy, saying individuals can “front-run Wall Street” by owning blockchain infrastructure now.

Real Vision CEO Raoul Pal argued that AI and blockchain are converging into a single new infrastructure layer for the global economy. He forecast the crypto market could grow from roughly $2.7 trillion today to $100 trillion within a decade. “We can own the infrastructure layer for the first time in history,” Pal said.

Pal framed the current moment as a historic acceleration point, comparing AI adoption to “Metcalfe’s law squared” and citing data showing AI now produces more words annually than humans. He said humanity is approaching a point where AI systems become “apex intelligence,” fundamentally reshaping labour, finance and daily life.

Advertisement

Why Pal says this moment is structurally different from past cycles

Pal’s $100 trillion thesis has sharpened around AI convergence. In earlier analysis, crypto.news tracked Pal’s argument that a debt-driven liquidity cycle would push crypto higher through 2026. His newer position adds AI as a structural demand driver on top of that macro thesis.

He described crypto as a permissionless equity system, allowing anyone with a phone to own exposure to blockchain infrastructure without KYC restrictions. Pal has also recently argued that all banks will eventually run on Ethereum, treating the network as long-term financial infrastructure.

What Pal says could derail crypto

Asked in the interview what could stop crypto adoption, Pal replied: “Nothing stops this train.” The response reflects his view that AI agent demand for on-chain rails is now structural, not cyclical. AI agents require instant settlement, fractional payments and permissionless access, none of which traditional payment systems support at scale.

Advertisement

Pal recommends holding Bitcoin for pure store of value and a basket of major layer-1 networks for the coordination layer. He has previously noted that moves between assets reflect capital rotation rather than structural trend changes, underscoring his preference for core positions over speculative bets.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Bulls’ Favorite Metric Drops to Six-Week Low; Silver Lining

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin is showing tentative signs of stabilization as demand signals around Coinbase suggest resilient appetite even after a wave of profit-taking. While traders booked profits into early May, market data indicates steady buyer interest that could support a renewed push higher in the weeks ahead.

According to CryptoQuant, BTC traded up to about $82,000 on May 4, with holders realizing roughly $1.14 billion in daily profits as the move paused. That period also saw unrealized profit margins climb to 17.7% on May 5 — the highest level since June 2025 — underscoring a market still flush with capital even as prices retraced.

In the meantime, the Coinbase Premium Index slipped to -0.087 on May 19, the weakest reading since March 31, signaling Bitcoin traded at a discount on Coinbase relative to Binance and suggesting softer demand from U.S.-based buyers. Yet the 14-day simple moving average of the premium has remained in an uptrend, staying above February lows and hinting at steadier underlying demand rather than a wholesale exodus from spot markets.

Analysts also highlight that activity within the Coinbase-linked ecosystem has held up during the pullback. The Base blockchain revenue rose to nearly $972,000 on May 19, a level that exceeded late-March readings even as the Coinbase Premium Gap remained negative. The divergence points to robust on-chain participation within Coinbase’s broader ecosystem while spot demand gradually rebuilds.

Advertisement

The immediate price setup remains constructive on the daily chart. BTC has stayed above the 100-day exponential moving average near $76,800, which continues to act as a key dynamic support. After a test of higher levels, the market has moved within a $76,000–$77,000 fair-value zone that has historically drawn accumulation. A sustained bounce from this area could reopen a path toward $80,000–$82,000, yet the next larger supply ceiling sits higher, near $86,000–$90,000.

A close below $74,800 would threaten the current higher-low pattern and redirect focus to the psychological $70,000 level. Meanwhile, futures data depict a market resilient to selling pressure. CryptoOnChain noted that Bitcoin’s 30-day moving-average net taker volume declined to about $58 million on May 18 from $243 million in April, but remained positive during the recent pullback, implying that futures buyers continued to absorb selling pressure near the prevailing price.

For investors watching the macro mosaic, the dialogue between on-chain participation and exchange-based demand remains essential. On the one hand, negative Coinbase premium readings signal a potential friction point for U.S.-based buyers; on the other, rising on-chain activity and a sustained price above key thresholds point to underlying demand that could support a renewed rally if broader conditions stay constructive. Related analyses in the space have contemplated scenarios that include conservative price-paths to the year-end, underscoring how quickly sentiment can shift as new catalysts emerge. Cointelegraph coverage notes a conservative $255K year-end target in one model.

Key takeaways

  • The Coinbase Premium Index fell to -0.087 on May 19, the weakest since March 31, indicating a price gap where BTC costs less on Coinbase than on Binance.
  • The 14-day SMA of the premium remains in an uptrend, suggesting underlying demand resilience despite negative readings.
  • BTC held above the 100-day EMA near $76,800, with a potential move back toward $80,000–$82,000 if demand strengthens from the current range.
  • On-chain activity within Coinbase’s ecosystem remained elevated even as prices retraced; Base network revenue reached nearly $972,000 on May 19.
  • Futures activity shows resilience: 30-day net taker volume dipped but stayed positive, indicating continued absorption of selling pressure by futures buyers.

Coinbase Premium Signals: Demand versus Profit-Taking

Despite a negative premium reading, the 14-day trend in the Coinbase Premium Index points to a quieter but persistent demand backdrop. Market observers caution that the negative reading reflects price dispersion across exchanges rather than a wholesale collapse in appetite. With traders realizing a sizable portion of gains in early May, the question remains whether renewed spot demand will catch up to the underlying on-chain participation seen in subsequent weeks.

CryptoQuant data also highlighted a breathing space between on-chain activity and exchange prices. While profit-taking accelerated as BTC rallied toward $82,000, the network activity associated with Coinbase’s ecosystem did not simply evaporate. The recovery in Base revenue alongside a still-positive futures backdrop paints a picture of a market that could rebound if price action consolidates above critical levels.

Advertisement

Technical Outlook: Key Levels and Scenarios

From a risk management perspective, price action continues to respect a framework of support near $76,800 and a broader band that has held through recent swing lows. The gap between $76,000 and $77,000 is considered a fair-value zone that historically invites accumulation during pullbacks, potentially enabling BTC to retest resistance near $80,000–$82,000.

Above that, the next major hurdle sits in the $86,000–$90,000 region, where supply dynamics have previously intensified. Conversely, a daily close below $74,800 would likely signal a breakdown of the current higher-low pattern and could shift attention toward the psychological support around $70,000. In the near term, the price path remains tethered to the balance between demand signals on exchanges like Coinbase and the placement of on-chain activity within the broader ecosystem.

On-Chain Activity and Derivatives Context

The discrepancy between negative exchange premiums and elevated on-chain activity raises important questions about where demand is accruing. Base network revenue near $972,000 on May 19 indicates ongoing utilization of Coinbase-affiliated layers, even as price-based demand fluctuates. Meanwhile, the futures picture shows that buyers have continued to step in at or near current levels, absorbing selling pressure despite thinning momentum in some metrics.

As investors weigh the next move, the interplay between exchange pricing, on-chain activity, and derivatives flows will be pivotal. A sustained uptick in Coinbase premium and a firm break above the $77,000–$78,000 zone could attract renewed spot interest and push BTC toward the upper end of the short-term range. Conversely, further pressure on the premium and a breach of key support could reframe risk expectations for the coming weeks.

Advertisement

What remains most uncertain is how the macro environment and broader risk sentiment will interact with these micro signals. Watch for a potential reacceleration in on-chain activity alongside a normalization of the Coinbase premium, which would collectively bolster the case for a constructive mid-to-late-year trajectory for Bitcoin. The story continues to unfold as market participants digest upcoming catalysts and reassess their positions in response to evolving data.

Readers should monitor the evolving relationship between exchange pricing, on-chain participation, and derivatives behavior, as these elements together will likely shape Bitcoin’s trajectory in the near term.

For ongoing coverage of Bitcoin price dynamics and related market signals, see the broader discourse on price-model scenarios and year-end targets that frequently surface in industry analyses. Related analysis on potential year-end targets.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Coinbase Launches USDC-Backed Stablecoin with Flipcash

Published

on

Coinbase Launches USDC-Backed Stablecoin with Flipcash

Coinbase launched USDF with Flipcash, a Solana-based stablecoin backed 1:1 by Circle’s USD Coin, as the crypto exchange expands its infrastructure business for companies issuing branded digital currencies.

According to Wednesday’s announcement, USDF is designed to serve as the settlement asset for currencies created on Flipcash, a platform where users can launch fixed-supply digital currencies priced and transacted in the stablecoin. Flipcash said the token is intended to function as the primary dollar asset within its app.

In December, Coinbase launched its white-label stablecoin issuance service for companies seeking branded digital dollar products without managing their own reserve, custody or settlement infrastructure. The platform includes fiat onramps, wallet services and USDC (USDC) reserve backing. It previously identified Solflare, R2 and Flipcash among companies exploring launches using the system.

Flipcash said it selected Coinbase’s platform because it provided USDC-backed reserves, onchain settlement infrastructure and integrated fiat access through a single service.

Advertisement

According to DefiLlama data, USDC is the world’s second-largest stablecoin by market capitalization, with roughly $77 billion in circulation.

Source: DefiLlama

Related: Trump filing discloses Coinbase, Strategy crypto-linked exposure in Q1

Stablecoin infrastructure providers expand white-label issuance services

The launch comes as stablecoin issuers and crypto infrastructure providers increasingly offer white-label services that allow businesses to launch branded digital dollar products without managing their own blockchain infrastructure or reserves.

In September 2025, Stripe launched Open Issuance, a platform that allows businesses to create and manage their own stablecoins through its Bridge unit. Stripe said the system allows companies to control minting, branding and reserve economics while connecting to shared liquidity infrastructure.

Advertisement

In May, Western Union launched its Solana-based USDPT stablecoin, with issuance handled by Anchorage Digital and wallet and settlement infrastructure provided by Fireblocks. The company said the token would support blockchain-based settlement and cross-border payment services across parts of its remittance network.

Earlier examples include Binance’s BUSD stablecoin, launched in 2019, and PayPal USD, launched in 2023, both of which were issued by Paxos.

Crypto infrastructure companies have also expanded into stablecoin issuance, payments and settlement infrastructure in recent months. Earlier this month, Bakkt completed its acquisition of stablecoin infrastructure firm Distributed Technologies Research as part of its push to build a 24/7 digital settlement layer powered by stablecoin and AI payment technology.

The stablecoin market capitalization has climbed to roughly $323 billion from about $244 billion a year ago, an increase of nearly 32%, according to DefiLlama data.

Advertisement

Source: DefiLlama

Magazine: eToro founder timed Bitcoin top perfectly due to belief in 4 year cycles

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP Exchange Flow Shifts as Bybit Deposit Wave Ends, Binance and Coinbase Turn Negative

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Bybit’s XRP transaction delta returned close to zero around May 16, ending a month-long deposit trend.
  • Sustained deposit activity on Bybit from mid-April to mid-May signaled potential sell-side pressure.
  • Binance and Coinbase have shifted back to negative delta, meaning withdrawals now outpace deposits.
  • The metric tracks transaction count, not token volume, offering a directional but partial market view.

XRP exchange-flow behavior is showing a notable shift across major trading venues. After weeks of persistent deposit activity on Bybit, the platform’s transaction delta returned close to zero around May 16.

Meanwhile, Binance and Coinbase have moved back into negative territory. This change reflects a clear rotation in exchange behavior, suggesting that the broad selling pressure seen during the mid-April to mid-May period has cooled considerably.

Bybit’s Month-Long Deposit Trend Comes to a Halt

XRP deposit activity on Bybit remained consistently elevated from mid-April through mid-May. During that stretch, the exchange recorded strong and persistent positive readings in its transaction delta.

Sustained deposit-side activity is often associated with potential sell-side pressure in crypto markets. Coins moving into exchanges are typically more available for trading or liquidation.

The shift became apparent around May 16, when Bybit’s delta returned near zero. That move marked a clear break from the previous pattern of heavy deposit imbalance.

Advertisement

On a transaction-count basis, the deposit pressure that defined the prior period has now faded. This change removes one of the more visible sources of supply-side activity in recent weeks.

Crypto analyst Amr Taha shared the observation based on the XRP Multi-Exchange Daily Depositing/Withdrawing Transactions Delta. The data tracks transaction counts rather than total token volume.

So it does not confirm exact amounts of XRP moved in or out. However, the directional shift across multiple venues remains a notable development.

The end of Bybit’s deposit wave does not guarantee a price move in either direction. Rather, it removes a layer of exchange-side pressure that was present for roughly a month.

Advertisement

Traders watching supply dynamics will likely monitor whether this neutral reading holds or reverses in the coming sessions.

Binance and Coinbase Withdrawal Activity Points to a Different Flow Structure

As Bybit’s deposit activity cooled, Binance and Coinbase moved back into negative delta territory. Negative readings indicate that withdrawal transactions are now outweighing deposit transactions on those platforms.

This is a different flow structure compared to what was seen during the Bybit-led deposit phase. The shift suggests coins are moving away from those exchanges rather than toward them.

Withdrawal-side behavior on major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase can reflect reduced near-term selling intent. When more tokens leave an exchange than enter, available supply on that platform tends to tighten.

Advertisement

That dynamic, when sustained, can shift the balance between buyers and sellers over time. However, short-term readings should be interpreted carefully without additional context.

The combination of Bybit cooling and Binance and Coinbase turning negative creates a different setup for XRP. The market is no longer showing the same broad exchange-deposit pressure from the prior period.

Instead, a rotation in flow behavior is now visible across major venues. This metric tracks transaction direction, making it a useful but partial view of overall market activity.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin Stablecoin Outflow: $1.2 Billion Leaves Binance as BTC Holds at $77.6K

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • Binance recorded a $1.2 billion stablecoin outflow, with $1 billion of that total consisting solely of USDT.
  • The withdrawal follows a recent Bitcoin sell-off, pointing to either short capitulation or spot profit realization.
  • Weekend low-liquidity conditions raise the risk of stop-hunts and leveraged liquidations around the $77,600 zone.
  • Reduced stablecoin reserves on Binance limit near-term buying pressure, making sustained upward momentum unlikely soon.

Bitcoin is trading around the $77,600 level as a $1.2 billion stablecoin outflow exits Binance. Of that total, $1 billion consists of USDT alone.

The movement follows a recent downward price wave. Stablecoin flows on derivative-heavy exchanges like Binance are closely watched by traders. They often signal what major market participants are planning next.

What the $1 Billion USDT Withdrawal Reveals About Market Sentiment

Stablecoin flows on exchanges act as leading indicators for price movement. When stablecoins leave exchanges, it often means traders are pulling capital rather than preparing to deploy it.

That shift in behavior tells a story about current market confidence. The timing here, coming after a sell-off, makes it worth examining closely.

Two scenarios stand out as the most probable explanations for this outflow. The first is short capitulation, where bearish derivative traders close profitable positions and withdraw proceeds.

Advertisement

The second is spot profit realization, where investors who recently sold Bitcoin are moving their USDT to cold storage or external wallets. Both scenarios point toward reduced near-term buying pressure on Binance.

Analyst BorisD flagged the move noting that stablecoin inflows near resistance zones typically prepare the ground for short positions or profit-taking.

Meanwhile, inflows near market bottoms tend to support upward price action. The current outflow does not fit either of those setups cleanly, which adds to the uncertainty.

This ambiguity is what makes the $1 billion USDT exit particularly notable. Rather than a clear directional bet, it reads more as a withdrawal of capital from the field entirely. That kind of behavior tends to precede consolidation phases rather than sharp moves in either direction.

Advertisement

Weekend Price Action Could Bring Liquidity Sweeps on Both Sides

With the weekend approaching, lower liquidity conditions are expected across crypto markets. Thinner order books make it easier for large players to push price through key levels temporarily.

That environment often produces stop-hunts on both long and short positions. Traders holding leveraged exposure should factor this in.

Consolidation around the $77,600 zone is the most likely short-term outcome. The market needs time to rebuild liquidity pools after the recent wave of selling.

Sideways price action, punctuated by sharp spikes in either direction, fits this pattern well. Neither bulls nor bears currently hold a decisive edge at this level.

Advertisement

Leveraged traders face the highest risk during this kind of environment. A brief wick above or below a key level can trigger cascading liquidations before price returns to range.

Managing position size and stop placement becomes more important than direction calls during consolidation. The data from Binance supports a cautious stance for now.

As Bitcoin holds at $77,600, the market appears to be in a wait-and-see mode. The $1.2 billion stablecoin outflow has removed a layer of potential buying fuel from Binance.

Until fresh capital re-enters the exchange, sustained directional momentum remains unlikely. Traders are advised to monitor stablecoin flow data closely over the coming sessions.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Clarity Act could unlock $2T says Ripple CLO

Published

on

CLARITY Act hits its final window on May 21

Ripple CLO Stuart Alderoty says the Clarity Act could unlock a multi-trillion dollar US crypto market.

Summary

  • The Senate Banking Committee advanced the Clarity Act 15-9 on May 14, with two Senate Democrats voting yes despite Elizabeth Warren’s opposition.
  • Ripple CLO Stuart Alderoty called it a “monumental outcome” and cited 67 million American crypto holders as the constituency the bill protects.
  • The bill still needs 60 Senate floor votes, two committee reconciliations and Trump’s signature before it becomes law.

The Senate Banking Committee advanced the Clarity Act 15-9 on May 14, a bipartisan result that lifts the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act toward a full Senate floor vote.

“The Clarity Act isn’t about protecting an industry. It’s about protecting everyday Americans who deserve clear rules when they participate in the multi-trillion dollar crypto economy. 67 million Americans already hold crypto. The data is in. It’s time,” Ripple CLO Stuart Alderoty said in a post.

Advertisement

What the Clarity Act would actually do

The bill would establish which regulator — the SEC or the CFTC — has jurisdiction over specific digital assets, ending the enforcement-by-ambiguity approach that has defined US crypto oversight since 2017. Crypto.news explored why the legislation matters more to XRP than to almost any other asset.

The Clarity Act would formally classify named tokens including XRP as digital commodities, removing legal uncertainty that has kept institutional capital on the sidelines. Analysts at Standard Chartered estimate the bill could unlock $4 to $8 billion in additional XRP ETF inflows alone.

Why this bipartisan vote matters

The 15-9 result marks the first time a comprehensive crypto market structure bill has cleared the Senate Banking Committee with cross-party support. Every Republican voted yes, alongside two Senate Democrats despite opposition from Elizabeth Warren.

Advertisement

Despite the momentum, the bill still needs 60 floor votes to clear a filibuster. It then faces reconciliation between the Banking and Agriculture Committee versions before alignment with the House text from July 2025.

What still has to happen before it becomes law

Crypto.news has tracked Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse warning the bill’s chances drop sharply if lawmakers fail to act before campaign season. Senators Lummis and Moreno have both warned that failure in 2026 means the next window is 2030.

The XRP price page tracks market reaction against that legislative backdrop in real time.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitfinex margin longs hit 2.5-year high as bitcoin faces key resistance levels

Published

on

Bitfinex margin longs hit 2.5-year high as bitcoin faces key resistance levels

Bitcoin has now declined for five consecutive trading days between May 15 and May 19, marking its second longest losing streak of the year and trying to put in its first daily green candle in six days.

The latest pullback has seen bitcoin slide from above $80,000 to roughly $76,000 in light of broader market weakness.

During the downturn, leveraged traders on Bitfinex continue to add exposure. Data from the TradingView shows bitcoin margin longs, positions opened using borrowed funds, have risen to 80,636 BTC, up roughly 1.5% over the past several days and now sitting at their highest level in two and a half years. The last time longs were this elevated was in December 2023, when bitcoin traded near $43,000.

According to TradingView data, Bitfinex margin longs have climbed around 10% since the start of the year, even as bitcoin itself has fallen 13%. The divergence underscores continued accumulation from large traders despite BTC remaining nearly 35% below its October all-time high of $126,000.

Advertisement

Historically, the so-called “Bitfinex whale” has often acted as a contrarian signal. Over the past five years, large leveraged long positions on the exchange have frequently expanded during periods of market weakness and capitulation, while being reduced closer to local market tops and trend reversals.

Bitcoin is now approaching a key technical zone. The asset is currently testing both the True Market Mean, an onchain valuation metric representing the market’s aggregate cost basis, and the short-term holder realized price, which tracks the average acquisition price of recent buyers over the past 155 days, near $78,000, just above the current spot price. Above that, the 200-day moving average sits just over $81,000, representing another major resistance level for bulls to reclaim.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025