Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Crypto World

Strategy’s Michael Saylor Breaks Silence: Bitcoin Sales Now on the Table (MSTR)

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

Key Highlights

  • Strategy disclosed a massive $12.54 billion net loss in Q1 2026, primarily due to paper losses as Bitcoin declined 23.8% during the period
  • In a notable shift, Michael Saylor indicated the firm might liquidate portions of its Bitcoin holdings to meet dividend requirements
  • Strategy’s Bitcoin treasury consists of 818,334 BTC with an average purchase price of $75,537, currently valued at approximately $66.7 billion
  • The corporation maintains about 18 months of reserve capacity to cover $1.5 billion in yearly dividend and debt commitments
  • MSTR shares declined more than 4% in extended trading; Bitcoin dipped under $81,000 following the disclosure

Strategy, recognized as the largest publicly listed corporate Bitcoin accumulator globally, disclosed a staggering $12.54 billion net loss for Q1 2026. The overwhelming majority of these losses stemmed from unrealized depreciation on the company’s cryptocurrency portfolio as Bitcoin’s value plummeted 23.8% throughout the quarter.

During the quarterly earnings discussion, Executive Chairman Michael Saylor delivered an unexpected revelation. For the first time in the company’s Bitcoin acquisition history, he acknowledged that Strategy might liquidate a portion of its cryptocurrency reserves to satisfy dividend obligations.

“We will probably sell some Bitcoin to pay a dividend just to inoculate the market and send the message that we did it,” Saylor stated.

This represents a dramatic departure from Saylor’s historically unwavering position against selling Bitcoin under any circumstances—a philosophy he’s championed publicly for years.

Just weeks earlier in February 2026, Saylor informed CNBC that Strategy planned to “buy Bitcoin every quarter forever.” During that same interview, he confidently asserted the corporation could weather a Bitcoin crash to $8,000 without requiring any asset liquidation.

Strategy’s cryptocurrency treasury currently consists of 818,334 Bitcoin acquired at an average entry point of $75,537 per unit. At current market valuations, this position represents approximately $66.7 billion in total holdings.

The enterprise faces roughly $1.5 billion in combined annual dividend distributions and debt service requirements. According to Saylor’s calculations, Strategy maintains approximately 18 months of financial runway using its existing cash and USD-denominated reserves.

Advertisement

Saylor characterized the company’s operational framework as a credit-driven strategy: secure financing to accumulate Bitcoin, allow the asset to appreciate over time, then strategically liquidate portions to fulfill financial commitments.

Perpetual Preferred Shares and the Stretch Financial Product

Strategy has been deploying dividend-bearing perpetual preferred equity instruments, particularly its proprietary Stretch offering, to bankroll its ongoing Bitcoin acquisition campaign. The Stretch product has been instrumental in financing a substantial portion of the 145,834 Bitcoin that Strategy has accumulated throughout 2026.

Saylor expressed his ambition for Stretch to evolve into the “biggest credit instrument in the world.” He emphasized that expanding assets under management would enhance market liquidity and generate powerful network effects.

Numerous Bitcoin-centric decentralized finance platforms, including Pendle and Saturn, have started tokenizing the 11% monthly dividend distributions from Stretch. This innovation enables these yields to be exchanged on blockchain networks, significantly enhancing trading liquidity.

Bitcoin-Collateralized Yield Products Coming Soon

Saylor projected that digital banking platforms will soon introduce Bitcoin-backed interest-bearing accounts to consumers. He suggested these products could deliver yields approaching 8%, which he contends surpasses typical stablecoin return rates.

Advertisement

“Check back in 12 more weeks, I think we’ll have some exciting news,” Saylor teased.

He highlighted that approximately three dozen related projects have launched within recent weeks, compared to zero activity just two to three months prior.

In the aftermath of the earnings announcement, Strategy’s equity price tumbled 4.33% during after-hours trading, settling at $178.80.

Bitcoin’s price also retreated below the $81,000 threshold immediately following Saylor’s comments.

Despite the difficult first quarter, Strategy appears positioned for improved Q2 performance, with Bitcoin climbing nearly 20% to $81,250 since the beginning of April.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Crypto World

Digital Chamber Defends OCC Crypto Trust Charter Approvals

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR

  • The Digital Chamber rejected Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s claim that crypto trust charter approvals were improper.
  • The group said Warren misread the National Bank Act and the OCC’s charter authority.
  • Warren argued that firms like Ripple, Circle, Paxos, BitGo, Fidelity, and Coinbase face weaker standards.
  • The Digital Chamber said federally regulated trust banks would not accept cash deposits or issue loans.
  • Cody Carbone said the OCC should use its charter powers as Congress advances stablecoin regulation.

Crypto industry group The Digital Chamber has pushed back against Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s claim that digital asset firms received improper national trust charter approvals from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

According to The Digital Chamber, Sen. Warren’s criticism misreads the National Bank Act and the OCC’s authority to approve national trust charters for crypto firms. The group made the argument in a Tuesday letter to Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould.

The response followed Warren’s letter to the OCC last week, where she said approvals involving Ripple, Circle, Paxos, Fidelity Digital Assets, BitGo, and Coinbase appeared to violate the National Bank Act. Warren also argued that the firms were not being held to the same standards as traditional banks.

The Digital Chamber, which says it represents more than 250 crypto-related entities, rejected that view. In the letter, CEO Cody Carbone said Warren’s description of the approvals as “apparent violations” misread both the statute and the OCC’s long-running charter powers.

The Digital Chamber Defends OCC Charter Authority

Carbone told the OCC that national trust charters fall within the agency’s existing legal powers. According to The Digital Chamber, the approvals do not create full-service banks and do not allow the firms to take cash deposits or issue loans.

Advertisement

The group said the firms would instead operate as federally regulated trust banks if they receive final approval. Under that structure, they would be allowed to custody customer assets while remaining outside the business model of deposit-taking commercial banks.

Warren’s letter argued that the recently approved digital asset firms were attempting to use the charter process in a way that conflicts with the National Bank Act. She also said the companies appeared to have organized their applications after Congress passed stablecoin legislation last summer.

The law cited by Warren is the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, known as the GENIUS Act. According to Warren, that law does not change the requirements of the National Bank Act or remove the OCC’s duty to apply banking standards.

Carbone rejected that argument in his response. He said it would be inconsistent for Congress to create a federal framework for stablecoin issuers while the OCC refused to use its charter authority for firms seeking federal oversight.

Advertisement

Stablecoin Rules Add Pressure To Charter Debate

The dispute comes as crypto firms continue to seek federal recognition through the OCC. Ripple, Circle, BitGo, Fidelity Digital Assets, and Paxos received conditional approvals last year, according to the report.

Those approvals remain conditional, meaning the firms still need final clearance before operating under the trust-bank structure. If finalized, the charters would give the companies a federal pathway for custody services but would not place them in the same category as traditional banks that accept deposits and make loans.

Warren has framed the issue as a financial-stability concern. In her letter, she warned that the OCC’s approvals could expose the banking system to risks if crypto firms receive federal charters without meeting bank-like requirements.

The Digital Chamber framed the matter differently. The group said the OCC’s trust-charter process gives regulators direct oversight of digital asset firms instead of leaving them outside the federal banking framework.

Advertisement

At the same time, the charter dispute has unfolded alongside other points of tension between banks, lawmakers, and crypto firms. The treatment of stablecoin rewards was one of the issues debated during work on crypto legislation, though lawmakers later resolved that dispute as the bill advanced.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Hyperliquid Launches Prediction Markets for Offchain Events

Published

on

Hyperliquid Launches Prediction Markets for Offchain Events

Decentralized exchange (DEX) Hyperliquid launched canonical prediction markets for offchain events, as the platform starts expanding beyond perpetual futures.

Validators run automated newsfeed software that publishes the markets and votes on deployment and settlement, Hyperliquid said in a Monday Telegram post.

The markets are built on Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 and use Circle’s USDC (USDC) as the quote asset. Hyperliquid said the first markets will open based on the May Consumer Price Index (CPI) year-over-year change and the June federal funds rate decision.

The launch puts prediction markets inside Hyperliquid’s existing trading stack, allowing users to trade event outcomes alongside spot and perpetual futures rather than moving collateral to a separate platform.

Advertisement

The rollout adds weight to a thesis advanced by Delphi Digital that Hyperliquid is evolving from a perp DEX into a broader onchain financial venue.

“What’s different now is that the stack is finally mature enough for true crypto superapps (aggregated giants) to exist without being limited to the wallet form factor,” Delphi said in a December research report.

The HYPE token’s price soared by 20% when Hyperliquid first announced plans to launch prediction market functionalities, Cointelegraph reported in February.

Hyperliquid announces the launch of canonical prediction markets. Source: Hyperliquid Telegram Channel

Advertisement

Is Hyperliquid crypto’s next “super-app”?

Hyperliquid’s expanding functionalities are making it the crypto industry’s next “super-app,” according to Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at crypto asset manager Bitwise. He wrote in a May 19 report:

“Hyperliquid has become the ‘super-app’  Atkins envisioned—a ‘non-SEC regulated platform’ offering investors exposure to “a variety of asset classes.” 

Hougan added that the Hyperliquid (HYPE) token is “one of the most mispriced assets in crypto today,” despite outperforming the wider crypto market since the start of 2026. He argued that investors are mispricing it, valuing it only as a perp DEX rather than a financial “super-app.”

HYPE & Total Crypto Market Capitalization, year-to-date chart for 2026. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Since the beginning of the year, the HYPE rose more than 134% while the total crypto market capitalization fell by around 14%, TradingView data shows.

Advertisement

Related: Polymarket team says user funds safe as exploit losses climb above $600K

Hyperliquid is currently the fifth-largest protocol by weekly fees and generated over $11 million in fees during the past week, according to DefiLlama data.

In the month leading up to May 10, Hyperliquid generated $50.95 million in revenue, all of which went directly to token holders with zero spent on incentives.

Magazine: The legal battle over who can claim DeFi’s stolen millions  

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Luffa secures strategic investment from GoFintech Quantum at US$220 million valuation, pioneering AI + fintech frontier

Published

on

Luffa secures strategic investment from GoFintech Quantum at US$220 million valuation, pioneering AI + fintech frontier

HONG KONG, May 26, 2026 — Luffa AI, a leading innovator at the intersection of Web3 and Artificial Intelligence, today announced a strategic equity investment from Hong Kong-listed GoFintech Quantum Innovation Limited (“GoFintech Quantum”, Stock Code: 00290.HK). The transaction values Luffa AI at US$220 million. The two parties will engage in deep strategic collaboration across artificial intelligence, quantum security, blockchain, and compliance fintech to jointly explore the new AI + Quantum Blockchain Fintech track.

The current internet is highly fragmented: identities are siloed and controlled by platforms, AI agents lack independent identities, wallets, and execution capabilities, value and payments are locked within closed ecosystems, and AI-generated content remains unverifiable with unclear compliance pathways. Luffa addresses these challenges through three core dimensions of super connectivity. In Community, it enables trusted DID-based self-sovereign identity, AI agent empowerment, and on-chain governance for true decentralized autonomy. In Content, channels become programmable and tradable value containers, supporting creator influence tokenization and multi-layered monetization. In Aggregation, the SuperBox open mini-app ecosystem, multi-chain wallets, LuffaPay intent-based payments, and multi-agent commercial protocols seamlessly connect applications across all scenarios. These three systems form a closed loop that bridges the critical gaps between users and identity, identity and assets, content and value, as well as online and offline experiences.

As of February 2026, Luffa’s ecosystem has achieved rapid growth, with over 3 million global downloads, 2 million registered users, and more than 150,000 daily active users. Its core products, Luffa Wallet and SuperBox Mini-App Platform, are now officially launched, with proven use cases in prediction markets, AI mini-games, RWA, creator economy, and community governance. In 2026, Luffa will focus on the AI-powered Web3 ecosystem to build a globally leading intelligent trading ecosystem.

This strategic investment represents a significant milestone for Luffa AI in advancing privacy-preserving infrastructure and intelligent interaction technologies. GoFintech Quantum has made multi-faceted deployments in quantum encryption algorithms and blockchain technology, with deep expertise in institutional financial services,GoFintech Quantum will provide strong technical backing for Luffa’s AI Agent infrastructure and privacy-secure communications, accelerating its global commercialization and ecosystem expansion.

Under the strategic cooperation framework, Luffa AI and GoFintech Quantum will collaborate globally in the following areas: joint research and development of AI-driven intelligent investment systems, on-chain financial automation platforms, and smart trading & risk management solutions; exploration of blockchain applications and digital asset compliance frameworks; development of RegTech solutions compliant with Hong Kong and international standards; advancement of quantum encryption for digital asset security and blockchain scenarios.

Advertisement

Michael Liu, CEO of Luffa AI, commented:

“Luffa is redefining interaction in entertainment, culture, and commerce, giving users genuine ownership, privacy, and direct governance over the platform. GoFintech Quantum’s profound capabilities in quantum financial security and cross-border compliance will provide a solid foundation for building the next generation of social and AI Agent infrastructure. Together, we are moving from imagining a better web to actively creating it.”

“We are thrilled to finalize our strategic investment in Luffa AI,” said Tianfu Yuan, CEO of GoFintech Quantum. “This is more than a milestone for our innovation-driven strategy; it is a pivotal step in exploring the convergence of quantum technology with AI and Web3. We look forward to working closely with the Luffa team to build a more secure and intelligent digital infrastructure.”

About Luffa

Luffa is a groundbreaking Web3 and AI super connector that integrates decentralized identity (DID), AI agents, Web3-native wallets, social features, and mini-programs into a unified ecosystem. It empowers users to create channels, mini-programs, and AI bots, delivering a seamless one-stop experience. Empowering individuals, communities, brands, and AI developers alike, Luffa offers a verifiable behavior system, programmable economic models, and a secure interaction environment, with support for agent-driven transactions, loyalty program deployment, and decentralized collaboration. Luffa is committed to turning attention into ownership and connections into business opportunities.

About GoFitech Quantum Innovation Limited (00290.HK)

GoFintech Quantum Innovation Limited (00290.HK) is a cross-border, cross-industry technology innovation investment platform based in Hong Kong, backed by the Greater Bay Area, and globally oriented. It holds SFC Type 1, 4, 6, 9 licenses and cross-border qualifications including QFII, CIBM, QDIE, QFLP, and Bond Connect. The Group has built a closed-loop ecosystem across four business segments: Technology Innovation, Finance, Art, and Trade. With strategic deployments in quantum technology and digital assets, it drives a model where investment powers investment banking and innovation feeds back into traditional businesses, aiming to become a global leader in quantum technology applications.

Media contact:

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Hedera-based BrandBoost targets gamified loyalty programs for enterprises

Published

on

Hedera-based BrandBoost targets gamified loyalty programs for enterprises

Swiss blockchain firm The Hashgraph Group has launched BrandBoost on Hedera, introducing tokenized loyalty rewards and real-time customer engagement tools for enterprises.

Summary

  • The Hashgraph Group has launched BrandBoost on Hedera to help enterprises create tokenized loyalty rewards and real-time customer engagement systems.
  •  BrandBoost combines gamification, digital collectibles, self-custody wallets, and identity verification tools for sectors including sports, media, entertainment, and telecom.

According to an announcement shared with crypto.news, the new software-as-a-service platform targets enterprises looking to move beyond traditional loyalty systems built around static points and membership cards. 

The company said BrandBoost combines gamification tools, tokenized incentives, digital collectibles, and AI-driven consumer analytics to create what it described as a more interactive loyalty experience.

Advertisement

At a time when brands are competing for repeat consumer attention across online platforms, retail stores, sports venues, entertainment events, and connected devices, The Hashgraph Group said businesses increasingly need systems that can respond to customer behaviour instantly instead of relying on delayed reward mechanisms after purchases are completed.

Data cited by the company from Deloitte’s 2025 customer loyalty research showed that 72% of consumers said loyalty programs make them more likely to spend with preferred brands, while 56% said such programs increase how much they spend. 

Deloitte’s research also found that only 51% of respondents actively engage with more than one loyalty program, a figure The Hashgraph Group used to highlight competition among brands for sustained customer engagement.

THG expands Hedera enterprise products

Built on Hedera’s distributed ledger infrastructure, BrandBoost integrates THG’s AssetGuard wallet system and its IDTrust self-sovereign identity platform to support what the company described as secure and verifiable consumer interactions. 

Advertisement

Through an integrated token studio, businesses can create branded loyalty tokens that users can earn, redeem, trade, or spend through self-custody wallets.

Stefan Deiss, co-founder and chief executive officer of The Hashgraph Group, said loyalty programs are moving toward live digital engagement systems rather than traditional points-based structures.

“Loyalty programs are no longer just about points and rewards, but about creating live engagement ecosystems where consumers interact with brands in ways that feel immediate, relevant, and personalised,” Deiss said in the announcement. 

Advertisement

“With BrandBoost, we are enabling businesses to interact and transact with consumers in real-time, while unlocking new monetisation and revenue models through loyalty gamification models.”

The rollout adds to The Hashgraph Group’s growing portfolio of enterprise-focused Hedera products.

Back in September 2025, the company launched TransAct, a managed transaction gateway that allowed enterprises and government institutions to execute Hedera transactions without directly holding HBAR or managing crypto wallets.

At the time, Deiss said TransAct was designed to remove operational and compliance barriers that had slowed enterprise blockchain adoption by abstracting wallet management, gas fees, and crypto accounting requirements behind a traditional invoicing structure.

Separately, The Hashgraph Group also participated in Switzerland’s municipal blockchain biodiversity voucher initiative launched earlier this year in Muri bei Bern. The project introduced tokenized biodiversity reward vouchers on Hedera that residents could redeem for Swiss francs at local businesses after participating in environmental conservation work.

Within the BrandBoost launch, The Hashgraph Group said the platform can be deployed across sectors including sports, media, entertainment, and telecommunications, where companies are looking for tools to reduce subscriber churn and improve audience participation through tokenized incentives and real-time engagement systems.

Advertisement

Truesense partnership adds location verification layer

Alongside the platform launch, THG announced a strategic collaboration with Truesense to integrate ultra-wideband, or UWB, technology into BrandBoost. According to the company, the integration allows brands to verify physical attendance and user location with centimetre-level accuracy during events and gamified campaigns.

Armando Caltabiano, co-founder and chief executive officer of Truesense, said the partnership would support new monetization systems tied to consumer participation while also helping reduce fraud and account-sharing abuse.

The two companies said they recently completed a proof-of-concept deployment with a Latin American satellite television provider, where BrandBoost was tested alongside UWB-enabled USB-TV dongles developed by Truesense to support audience engagement and content monetization.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Former Hodlnaut CEO Charged in Singapore Over Terra Collapse Claims

Published

on

Former Hodlnaut CEO Charged in Singapore Over Terra Collapse Claims

Former Hodlnaut CEO Zhu Juntao was charged in Singapore with six counts of fraud by false representation, in a case tied to statements Zhu and Hodlnaut employees allegedly made after the 2022 collapse of the Terra ecosystem.

Singapore Police said Zhu, 36, was charged following an investigation by the Commercial Affairs Department and faces three charges under Section 424A(1)(a) read with Section 424A(3) of the Penal Code 1871, as well as three further charges under the same provision read with Section 109.

The case centers on alleged false claims about Hodlnaut’s exposure to the TerraUSD (UST) crash, including accusations that Zhu directed staff to issue some of the statements.

Police said Zhu allegedly instigated Hodlnaut employees to make misleading statements in the company’s official Telegram group and in emails sent to some users between May and July 2022, asserting that the platform did not have direct exposure to UST and had not suffered losses from its crash.

Advertisement

Singapore Police Force charges former Hodlnaut chief executive Zhu Juntao. Source: Singapore Police Force

The police statement also said Zhu published three similar posts on his personal Twitter account, now known as X, in June 2022. If convicted, he faces up to 20 years in prison, a fine, or both, on each charge.

Related: Singapore revokes crypto payment license of Bsquared over regulatory breaches

The charges revive scrutiny of one of the most damaging episodes in the 2022 digital asset market rout. The Terra ecosystem imploded in May 2022 when its algorithmic stablecoin UST lost its dollar peg, wiping out approximately $50 billion in market value and helping trigger broader failures across the crypto lending sector.

Hodlnaut’s collapse and liquidation

Hodlnaut, a Singapore-based crypto platform that allowed users to deposit tokens for yield, had more than 30,000 users worldwide before it became defunct in August 2022 due to financial difficulties, according to police.

Advertisement

The company halted withdrawals in August 2022, and its website now says its affairs, business and property are being managed by court-appointed liquidators.

Other crypto lenders, including Celsius Network and Voyager Digital, also fell into bankruptcy in 2022 amid the Terra fallout and a wider market slump, leaving hundreds of thousands of customers with frozen funds.

Celsius reported more than $10 billion in assets before its collapse, while Voyager’s Chapter 11 filing listed between $1 billion and $10 billion in assets and liabilities.

Cointelegraph reached out to Hodlnaut’s court-appointed liquidators, but they did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

Magazine: AI-driven hacks could kill DeFi — unless projects act now

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

XRP MVRV Sinks to 2020 Lows as Average Trader Losses Hit -47% and Fear Grips the Market

Published

on

Brian Armstrong's Bold Prediction: AI Agents Will Soon Dominate Global Financial

TLDR:

  • XRP 30-day MVRV ratio has fallen to its lowest level recorded since December 2020 cycle lows.
  • Average traders active in the past 30 days are currently holding unrealized losses of around -47%.
  • Crowd sentiment dropped to 1.1 bullish comments per bearish comment, placing XRP in the FUD zone.
  • Historically, deeply negative MVRV readings have preceded strong rebounds as panic selling slows down.

XRP is flashing signals that seasoned traders recognize from past market cycles. On-chain data shows the asset trading in deeply oversold territory, with both sentiment and return metrics reflecting widespread frustration among short-term holders.

At a current price of $1.35, XRP has shed more than half its market value since last summer’s peak.

Average Trader Returns Drop to Multi-Year Lows

The 30-day MVRV ratio for XRP has fallen to its lowest reading since December 2020. This metric tracks the average unrealized profit or loss among traders active within the past month. Currently, those traders are sitting on losses averaging -47%, a figure that reflects deep market pain.

According to Santiment Intelligence, MVRV ratios have historically reverted to 0% over time. This pattern means prolonged negative readings often precede recovery phases. The current reading suggests many short-term holders are capitulating or have already sold.

Much of this pressure traces back to XRP’s aggressive rally in late 2024 and early 2025. Many retail traders entered positions near local tops during that run-up. As momentum faded and repeated selloffs followed, those buyers found themselves deeply underwater.

Santiment noted that deeply negative MVRV zones tend to emerge when retail participation is exhausted. When that happens, even modest positive catalysts can spark sharp recoveries. The data does not guarantee a reversal, but it does point to reduced downside risk relative to potential upside.

Crowd Sentiment Drops Into FUD Zone

Alongside the on-chain data, social sentiment around XRP has also turned sharply negative. Santiment reported that the ratio of positive to negative commentary has dropped to just 1.1 bullish comments per bearish comment. That reading places XRP firmly in what analysts call the “FUD zone.”

Historically, this level of crowd pessimism has acted as a contrarian indicator for XRP’s price. When fear dominates social media, weak hands have typically already exited their positions. That reduces active selling pressure and often sets the stage for stabilization or a bounce.

The reverse dynamic plays out during periods of heavy optimism. When the positive-to-negative ratio climbs deep into “FOMO zone” territory, it usually marks a period where buyers are overextended. Those conditions tend to align with local price tops rather than sustainable rallies.

Despite the current negativity, some investors remain patient. Regulatory developments, ETF speculation, and Ripple’s broader adoption narrative continue to hold attention among longer-term holders.

These factors have not driven immediate price recovery, but they remain part of the broader market conversation around XRP’s trajectory.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin cools after $78k spike as value investor keeps buying cheap BTC

Published

on

Crypto Breaking News

Bitcoin’s price action has spent a fourth straight week in a defined range, with buyers defending the $74,000 level while sellers stack around the $78,000 to $80,000 band. Hyblock analysts observe that the intraday jump to $78,164 may have flushed underwater longs and pushed short-sellers toward breakeven, suggesting a delicate balance between demand and supply as the market tests a psychological threshold.

According to Hyblock, the rally into the $78,000 area appeared to trigger a wave of exits from positions that had previously been underwater, while optimistic shorts opted to cut losses at breakeven to avoid further downside risk. The firm’s insights come as traders monitor whether fresh liquidity can sustain a push through resistance, or if the price will retreat back into the established corridor.

BTC/USDT net positions heatmap. Source: Hyblock

Hyblock also highlighted the role of liquidations in the intra-day move and noted how liquidity tends to act like a magnet for BTC. The firm identified two notable clusters where liquidity is concentrated and building most rapidly—the area around $75,675 to $75,700 stands out as a particularly active pocket that could exert ongoing influence on near-term price behavior.

Advertisement

BTC/USDT liquidation heatmap. Source: Hyblock

In the broader context, Hyblock’s discussion of liquidity dynamics aligns with recent market chatter about how futures activity can drive price action even as spot demand absorbs a portion of selling pressure. The evolving balance between futures-driven liquidity and spot market participation remains a key factor for traders watching for a sustained breakout or a renewed pullback.

Meanwhile, observers note a separate development on the demand side. Adam Back, the CEO of Blockstream, drew attention to a large Bitcoin whale employing a time-weighted average price (TWAP) strategy to accumulate BTC at a brisk pace. Back tweeted that the whale has been gobbling up around 450 BTC per day for eight-and-a-half days, underscoring the persistent interest from sizable buyers even as price hovers near the lower end of the recent range.

Bitfinex Bitcoin whale TWAP data. Source: Adam Back / X

Advertisement

Price action and market structure: what the indicators are signaling

The day’s price action fits a familiar pattern: a futures-driven selloff that applies pressure through derivatives markets, while spot buyers step in to absorb a portion of the supply. This dynamic can soften the impact of downward moves and help keep the market anchored near key support levels. In the current setup, the orderbook shows persistent selling pressure beginning around $77,700, with asks thickening between $78,000 and $80,000. Such a configuration implies that buyers may need to sustain higher bids or for new liquidity to emerge to push through the upper band of the range.

From a structural standpoint, the $74,000 support zone remains a critical anchor, with the market’s ability to defend that level likely shaping near-term trajectory. If buyers can absorb selling pressure and push above the $78,000 to $80,000 zone, the next test would be whether new demand surfaces to sustain a breakout or if the market reverts to the established range highs and rebalances liquidity at those levels. Hyblock’s reference to concentrated liquidity pockets suggests that the market could hinge on how quickly liquidity rehomogenizes around those clusters, potentially influencing the speed and sustainability of any breakout attempt.

For traders, the combination of a defined range, visible liquidity clusters, and notable TWAP activity from a major whale creates a nuanced backdrop. The concentration of liquidity near $75,675–$75,700 could act as a magnet, drawing price toward that pocket if the market weakens. Conversely, persistent demand beyond the $78,000–$80,000 area would require fresh liquidity and a shift in orderbook depth to sustain a sustained move higher.

What this means for traders and investors

Investors should watch three intertwined signals: the persistence of the $74,000 support, the ability to thread through the $78,000–$80,000 resistance band, and the evolving liquidity landscape around the identified clusters. If the market continues to absorb futures-driven selling while spot demand remains relatively steady, there could be a setup for a cautious rally. However, a failure to clear the $78,000–$80,000 zone may re-emphasize the range-bound regime and direct attention to the liquidity magnets around $75,675–$75,700.

Advertisement

The presence of a notable TWAP-driven accumulation by a large holder adds another layer of consideration for sentiment and risk management. While a single pattern in BTC behavior is not predictive on its own, sustained buying pressure at regular intervals could provide a floor for prices even when derivatives markets tilt bearish in the near term.

As market participants digest these dynamics, the next important waypoint is how orderbook depth evolves around key levels. The depth signals—sellers appearing near $77,700 and thicker asks between $78,000 and $80,000—suggest a test of supply at the upper end of the current range. A clear move through that resistance zone would likely require a combination of renewed spot demand and a shift in liquidity distribution that benefits buyers stepping in with size.

For reference, readers can review related market coverage that discusses liquidation activity surrounding BTC price moves and how such episodes shape liquidity expectations in the near term. Earlier reporting noted that liquidations have been a feature of recent moves and underscores why understanding liquidity topology is essential for navigating volatility in this market.

In a broader sense, today’s observations reinforce a common theme: Bitcoin’s short- to medium-term direction remains tied to the tug-of-war between futures-driven supply and spot-side demand, with liquidity clusters acting as a critical barometer for whether the market can muster a sustained move beyond the current range.

Advertisement

What to watch next: if BTC can sustain bids above the key ceiling and tip through the $80,000 mark, a fresh wave of liquidity-driven momentum could emerge. If not, the probability of another test of the $74,000 support and renewed liquidity negotiations remains high, keeping traders cautious in the weeks ahead.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

China industrial profits jump 24.7% in April, fastest gain in over two years despite headwinds

Published

on

China industrial profits jump 24.7% in April, fastest gain in over two years despite headwinds

BEIJING — China’s industrial profits in April surged by 24.7% from a year earlier, according to official data released Wednesday, marking the fastest growth since November 2023.

The increase accelerated from a 15.8% rise in March, according to China’s biggest financial data provider Wind Information.

For the first four months of the year, enterprise profits rose 18.2%, up from 15.5% growth in the first quarter.

China reported slower economic growth in April, with a 4.1% increase in industrial output and a 0.2% rise in retail sales from a year ago. Fixed asset investment fell for the first four months of the year as the real estate drag steepened.

Advertisement

Exports remained strong, climbing 14.1% in April from a year ago in U.S. dollar terms. Imports surged by 25.3%, data released earlier in May showed.

The producer price index in April jumped 2.8% from a year ago, the most since July 2022.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Where crypto founders are incorporating in 2026

Published

on

Where crypto founders are incorporating in 2026

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

MiCA enforcement reshapes EU crypto as ESMA register reveals 204 authorized CASPs and leading jurisdictions emerge.

Advertisement

Summary

  • MiCA regulation now standardizes EU crypto licensing, with ESMA’s register tracking 204 authorized CASPs and their services.
  • Crypto firms are assessed on real authorization data, revealing which EU jurisdictions successfully issue MiCA licenses.
  • MiCA CASP licensing typically costs €200K–€475K in the first year and takes 6–9 months, with application quality as the main approval driver.

The transitional period is closing and the guessing is over. With MiCA — the EU’s single rulebook for crypto-asset services — now in force, the ESMA Interim MiCA Register works as a live scoreboard of where crypto businesses are actually incorporating.

Instead of trusting marketing claims about which jurisdiction is “crypto-friendly,” founders can read the register directly: who got authorized, for which services, and how far their EU passport reaches. Drawing on the current snapshot of 204 authorized CASPs, here is the map as it stands — four EU jurisdictions worth attention, and the two credible non-EU alternatives.

The state of play: One license, twenty-seven markets

MiCA’s core promise is the entire reason the EU dominates this conversation: a single CASP authorization, granted by one national competent authority (NCA), passports across all 27 Member States. Authorize once, notify the rest, operate everywhere. No non-EU regime offers a comparable single-application route into a market this large — and founders are responding. Of the 204 CASPs on the register, 51 were authorized in 2026 alone (about a quarter, in under five months), and 91 firms now passport into 27 or more markets. Home-state choice is heavily concentrated:

Advertisement
Home Member State Authorised CASPs Profile
Germany (BaFin) 55 Largest market
Netherlands (AFM) 25 Exchange-heavy
France (AMF) 17 Institutional
Malta (MFSA) 13 Exchange magnet
Cyprus (CySEC) 12 Consumer apps
Ireland (CBI) 12 Payments / scale
Czech Republic (CNB) 7 Fast riser
Luxembourg (CSSF) 7 Institutional
Lithuania (LB) 6 Startup default
Estonia (EFSA) 1 Sharp reversal

Source: ESMA Interim MiCA Register, live snapshot as of 22 May 2026 (204 CASPs total).

Germany leads on count, but volume isn’t fit. BaFin is thorough, German-language, and slow — sensible for an institution, rarely the right first move for a lean startup. The instructive story is in the smaller jurisdictions, where the trade-offs between speed, substance, and credibility are sharpest.

The four EU jurisdictions worth a founder’s attention

Malta — The exchange magnet

Malta is where the recognizable crypto-native exchanges went. The MFSA has authorized OKX, Crypto.com, Gemini, Gate, Blockchain.com and BVNK among 13 CASPs, plus a disproportionate share of full trading-platform (Class 3) authorizations. Its edge is institutional memory: it regulated crypto years before MiCA, so the MFSA understands exchange models and banking is acclimatized to crypto clients. The trade-off is real substance expectations.

Best for: funded exchanges that want to sit alongside the majors.

Advertisement

Lithuania — The startup default

Lithuania remains the pragmatic first choice for startups. The Bank of Lithuania accepts English, runs one of the faster EU processes (3–5 months), and offers a cost-effective base with a deep fintech ecosystem; authorized CASPs include Robinhood, CoinGate and Nuvei (the license holder behind Simplex). Its modest MiCA count understates its appetite — most of its large VASP-era base is mid-conversion to full CASP status.

Best for: first-time founders who want speed, English, and a regulator that has seen the model.

Estonia — The cautionary reversal

Estonia is the register’s biggest surprise. Once the undisputed capital of EU crypto licensing, it now shows just one MiCA-authorized CASP. An old VASP license doesn’t convert automatically into CASP authorization — firms must requalify in full — and the EFSA pairs that with strict substance enforcement. The lesson generalizes: a historically light-touch jurisdiction is not an easy MiCA jurisdiction, and substance — real local management — is now the binding constraint everywhere.

Best for: firms prepared to build genuine substance, not a mailbox.

Advertisement

Czech Republic — The fast riser

The Czech Republic shows how fast the map still moves: zero MiCA CASPs in February, seven today — ahead of Lithuania on count. The CNB is pragmatic, the process quick and affordable, English accepted, and Prague helps with hiring. The register is dominated by local rather than global brands, making it a low-friction base rather than a prestige address.

Best for: cost-conscious founders who value a central EU location and an early-mover window.

At a glance

Jurisdiction Typical SLA Language Substance Best fit
Malta 6–10 mo English High Funded exchanges
Lithuania 3–5 mo English Moderate Startups, fast launch
Estonia 4–8 mo English High Substance-ready firms
Czech Rep. 4–6 mo English Moderate Cost-conscious, CE base

Estimates reflect typical conditions and vary by service scope and applicant readiness.

When the EU isn’t the answer: Dubai and Singapore

MiCA’s passport is decisive when customers are European. When they’re not, paying for 27-market access that won’t be used — and meeting EU substance and capital rules — can be the wrong trade. Two non-EU hubs sit at opposite ends of the openness spectrum.

Advertisement

Dubai (VARA) — The open door

VARA was the world’s first regulator dedicated solely to virtual assets and runs the most explicitly welcoming major regime. It licenses on an activity basis (exchange, broker-dealer, custody, lending, advisory, transfer/settlement), with its Rulebook updated to v2.0 in mid-2025; the full process runs about 4–7 months. Pull factors: 100% foreign ownership, no personal income tax (with free-zone corporate-tax advantages), and a government treating digital assets as a national strategy. The catch — Dubai gives you the UAE and a global address, not an EU passport, and VARA covers the mainland and free zones but not the DIFC (regulated by the DFSA).

Best for: global or MENA-focused firms wanting speed and tax efficiency.

Singapore (MAS) — The prestige filter

Singapore is the opposite: top-tier reputation, deliberately rationed. Crypto is regulated on an activity basis under the Payment Services Act (Standard vs Major Payment Institution licenses). MAS has issued only a few dozen DPT licenses. Crucially, the DTSP regime under the FSMA (from 30 June 2025) now captures Singapore entities serving only overseas customers — and MAS has said plainly the bar is high and it will generally not license them; operating without a license risks penalties up to SGD 250,000 and/or three years’ imprisonment. A poor fit for a quick offshore setup; excellent for a substantive Asia-Pacific operation.

Best for: well-capitalized firms with a genuine APAC presence.

Advertisement

A simple way to choose

  • Where customers are? EU-facing → MiCA, almost always. Global/MENA → Dubai. APAC with substance → Singapore.
  • What services? Custody/exchange (Class 2, €125k) and trading platforms (Class 3, €150k) carry the heaviest load; advisory and order-routing (Class 1, €50k) are lighter.
  • How much substance can be built? Every credible regime now demands real local management. If you can’t staff it, Estonia-style rejections await.
  • Speed vs prestige? Lithuania and Czechia optimize for speed and cost; Malta, Luxembourg, and Singapore for standing.

Cost, timeline, and getting it right

Budget honestly: a MiCA CASP typically costs €200,000–€475,000 in year one (capital, incorporation, legal, MLRO, office, IT/security, NCA fees), on a realistic 6–9 month timeline for exchange-plus-custody scope. The biggest lever on both is application quality — incomplete dossiers, generic AML policies and template IT-security frameworks are the top causes of stalled or rejected applications, and a rejection costs three to six months.

The register’s clearest signal is that winning jurisdictions reward preparation, not optimism. Matching the right home state to your model, building substance from day one, and filing a regulator-ready package is what separates a four-month approval from a year of back-and-forth. This is where a specialized crypto licensing consultancy earns its fee — turning the live register into a jurisdiction and application strategy that fits, across EU and non-EU routes.

To explore the options, visit the official website.

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

European companies double down on China manufacturing despite EU de-risking push

Published

on

Germany's China problem – and why de-risking hasn't worked

Steam cracker units at the BASF Zhanjiang Verbund site in Zhanjiang, Guangdong province, China, on Thursday, March 26, 2026.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

BEIJING — More European companies are maintaining or expanding their supply chains in mainland China to remain competitive globally, according to a survey released Wednesday by the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China.

Advertisement

Nearly one-third of respondents said they were onshoring further in China, while 37% said they had not changed their supply chain strategy over the last two years, the report said.

The survey was based on responses from nearly 300 members collected from January to February who were familiar with their companies’ mainland China supply chain strategies.

In total, 68% of respondents said they were either staying or expanding operations in China. By comparison, only 7% said they were moving factory sourcing outside the country or setting up alternative manufacturing bases elsewhere, the report said.

“We don’t see sort of de-risking becoming a theme,” said Jens Eskelund, President of the EU Chamber of Commerce in China.

Advertisement

“If anything it would indicate that European companies continue to be more dependent on China as a sourcing and manufacturing location for their products,” he said.

Germany's China problem – and why de-risking hasn't worked

Automation lowers costs

Cost is one of the main reasons European companies are increasing production in China, the EU Chamber survey found.

Relatively low labor costs in China have helped power its role as a global manufacturing hub. But as factories face labor shortages, many have embraced automation — quickly.

“The cost of labor, which might be lower anyway, is becoming irrelevant itself, because [of] automation,” said Denis Depoux, senior partner, global managing director at Roland Berger, a consulting firm that helped the EU Chamber assemble the survey.

“The difference in the level of automation [versus] two years ago is mind-boggling. You don’t see anybody anymore,” he said, referring to his visit this week to a privately-owned Chinese copper manufacturing company.

Advertisement

Depoux added that while automation can initially cost more than human labor, factories can ultimately produce products more quickly.

For example, Chinese electric vehicle maker Nio, which has expanded into Europe, said one of its factories in China operates with 941 robots that can work fully autonomously across multiple vehicle models simultaneously — without workers on the production floor. That setup allows the factory to operate around the clock.

It’s all part of a local manufacturing ecosystem with access to lower industrial energy prices and raw material costs, Roland Berger pointed out in a March report titled “China’s cost and speed advantage: A wake-up call for Western companies.”

The report added that quarterly negotiations with suppliers on price and selective state subsidies often help Chinese products reach global markets earlier and at far lower costs.

Advertisement

About three-fourths of EU companies in China said their production facilities in the country were more efficient than operations elsewhere, the chamber’s survey found.

“In most industries today, you have at least one Chinese competitor, or an international competitor, that are leveraging Chinese supply chains,” Eskelund said.

“So I think in many industries, if you are able to compete on price and quality, you simply need to become a part of Chinese supply chains,” he said. “It’s not necessarily because you want to onshore on [to] China.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025