Connect with us

Crypto World

Terraform claims Jane Street behind $40B meltdown

Published

on

Terraform claims Jane Street behind $40B meltdown

Terraform Labs and its bankruptcy administrator have accused trading firm Jane Street of using insider information to front-run transactions and make a profit from the platform’s $40 billion crash.

Todd Snyder, the court-appointed administrator winding down Terraform Labs, reportedly filed the lawsuit against Jane Street, its co-founder Robert Granieri, and its two employees, Bryce Pratt and Michael Huang, in a Manhattan federal court on Monday.

The heavily redacted filing claims that Pratt, a former Terraform intern, was tasked with reestablishing communication with old Terraform employees. 

He set up a group chat called “Bryce’s secret” with various Terrform employees and higher-ups, where he learned insider information and relayed it back to Jane Street, the suit says.

Advertisement

One discussion about an investment in Terraform Labs was allegedly used to make profitable trades based on material nonpublic information. According to the suit, one such trade involved Terraform Labs privately withdrawing 150 million TerraUSD from liquidity pool Curve3pool in May 2022.

A wallet linked to Jane Street withdrew 85 million TerraUSD from the same liquidity pool 10 minutes later, the suit notes.

Read more: How did so many Jane Street traders wind up at FTX?

Synder told the WSJ that “Jane Street abused market relationships to rig the market in its favor” during Terraform’s collapse, and that he’s seeking restitution from “those who exploited their position and reaped substantial profits at the expense of Terraform Labs’ creditors.”

Advertisement

Jane Street, however, says the suit is filled with “baseless, opportunistic claims.” 

It said, “This desperate suit is a transparent attempt to extract money when it’s well-established that the losses suffered by Terra and Luna holders were the result of a multibillion-dollar fraud perpetrated by the management of Terraform Labs.”

Jane Street scrutinized for Terraform’s collapse

Terraform Labs’ crypto enterprise collapsed in May 2022 after its stablecoin TERRA depegged from the dollar. Its sister token LUNA crashed days later.

The incident wiped $40 billion from the crypto market, and the firm’s CEO, Do Kwon, was subsequently sentenced to 15 years in prison for wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud.

Advertisement

Jane Street is a multi-billion-dollar Wall Street quantitative trading firm that traded with Terraform Labs. 

In 2023, federal prosecutors were reportedly probing Telegram messages from various Jane Street and Jump Trading employees to determine if the firms committed any market manipulation that led to Terra’s collapse. 

Read more: How Jump Trading allegedly manipulated UST into collapse

Synder also launched a lawsuit against Jump Trading in December 2025 that claimed the firm made billions of dollars from a series of secret deals with Terraform while lying about the stablecoin’s capabilities.

Advertisement

Wintermute’s head of research, Igor Igamberdiev, claimed in 2023 that there’s a good chance that the wallet behind the 85 million TerraUSD withdrawal is linked to Jane Street and a Coinbase deposit he discovered.

This transaction is considered a major contributor to Terraform’s collapse

The memory of the collapse is still raw, with many unwilling to let it lie. Indeed, Zerohedge, a financial news blog criticized for its pro-Russian coverage, has suggested by way of revenge that a “big crypto syndicate” should force a short squeeze on Jane Street’s trading pairs, “wiping them out overnight.”

Multiple big names at FTX had originally worked for Jane Street prior to the creation of FTX, including Sam-Bankman-Fried and Caroline Ellison. After Terra’s collapse, these two, along with three more former Jane Street traders. would go on to cause the destruction of FTX.

Advertisement

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news and investigations, follow us on XBluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Ethereum Foundation Pledges to Support Privacy-First, Permissionless DeFi

Published

on

Ethereum Foundation Pledges to Support Privacy-First, Permissionless DeFi

The EF has created a team to support DeFi builders, focusing on privacy, security, and open-source principles.

The Ethereum Foundation is doubling down on decentralized finance this year, forming a dedicated internal unit to support builders and to scale what it calls “cypherpunk values alongside market growth.”

In a blog post published on Monday, Feb. 23, the organization framed DeFi as the “inevitable evolution of finance,” adding that “it’s been a critical driver of Ethereum’s growth and adoption.”

The foundation is explicit about the kind of DeFi it supports: “permissionless, censorship-resistant, privacy-first, self-custodial, and open source.”

Advertisement

The focus of the new DeFi unit, which sits within the organization’s App Relations team, is to guide DeFi development on Ethereum, support teams building in the space, and make sure projects stick to those principles. According to the blog post, the unit is led by Charles St. Louis and IvanGBI, both veterans from projects like DELV, MakerDAO, and Gearbox Protocol.

“The Ethereum Foundation believes in Defipunk: not finance that’s marginally better than TradFi, but finance that couldn’t exist without Ethereum,” the blog post reads.

First announced last year, “Defipunk” is the EF’s new framework that supports privacy- focused DeFi projects, as The Defiant reported earlier.

Ethereum remains the largest blockchain network by total value locked in DeFi, with $53.8 billion.

Advertisement

Priorities for 2026

To support the outlined plan, the foundation plans to set up “clear channels for DeFi teams to connect with the EF and each other,” though it didn’t provide specifics.

For 2026, the foundation is zeroing in on a set of priorities such as building stronger relationships with teams, improving security, supporting decentralization, advancing privacy, and conducting research.

Looking ahead, the Ethereum Foundation is also watching emerging intersections with AI, institutional adoption, stablecoins and new financial primitives, promising content and support in these areas.

To keep up with the trends, the organization has already set up a new unit dubbed the “dAI Team,” which aims to make Ethereum the “preferred settlement and coordination layer” for AI agents and the machine economy, The Defiant reported back in September.

Advertisement

The pledge to double down on DeFi comes just weeks after Tomasz Stańczak — who led the EF’s platform and EcoDev teams and founded execution-client project Nethermind — announced in mid-February that he would step down as co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation.

Stańczak, who has served in the role for just under a year, said in a post on X that Bastian Aue will take over as interim co-ED alongside current co-ED Hsiao-Wei.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Empery Digital Shareholder Urges BTC Sale, CEO Exit

Published

on

Empery Digital Shareholder Urges BTC Sale, CEO Exit

A major shareholder in Empery Digital has called on the company to abandon its Bitcoin-centric strategy, sell its digital asset holdings and return the proceeds to investors, along with demanding the resignation of the CEO and the entire board of directors.

In a letter to the company’s board on Monday, Tice P. Brown, who is the beneficial owner of roughly 9.8% of Empery Digital’s outstanding shares, accused management of entrenching themselves at shareholders’ expense. 

Brown said that Empery Digital’s leadership privately approached him on Feb. 18 with an offer to repurchase all of his shares at a price equal to 100% of their market net asset value (mNAV), which he called “a large premium to prevailing market valuations.” He declined the proposal, saying it was designed to preserve management’s positions rather than return capital to shareholders.

Brown previously criticized the company’s capital allocation decisions, particularly its governance and buyback strategy, and urged a complete pivot away from its Bitcoin (BTC) strategy. 

Advertisement

In response to Brown’s recent letter demanding both the Bitcoin sale and the immediate resignation of CEO Ryan Lane and the entire board, Empery Digital said the dissident investor “continues to misrepresent and distort the facts to further his self-serving campaign.” 

Source: The Moon Show

In its statement, the company pushed back on Brown’s characterization of events, saying: “Mr. Brown intimated his interest in having his shares repurchased by the company but initially demanded a significant premium to NAV. Management attempted to reach an agreement with Mr. Brown as it believed such an agreement would be in the best interests of the Company and all its shareholders.”

Related: Bitcoin ETFs still sit on $53B in net inflows despite recent outflows: Bloomberg

Empery Digital’s Bitcoin gambit could be upended

The revolt by a major shareholder highlights mounting tensions around Empery Digital’s business model, which is built on accumulating and holding Bitcoin as its principal asset. A push to liquidate that stash could upend the strategy and reshape investor expectations of the company’s value.

Empery Digital, formerly known as Volcon, began as an electric power sporting goods company producing electric off-road vehicles and related products. It pivoted to a Bitcoin-centric corporate treasury strategy in mid-2025, adopting the new focus with the stated goal of becoming a Bitcoin aggregator.

Advertisement

Since then, Empery has accumulated 4,081 BTC, making it one of the top 25 publicly traded Bitcoin holders globally.

Empery acquired the bulk of its BTC holdings last summer. Source: BitcoinTreasuries.NET

Digital asset treasuries have come under pressure as crypto prices have retraced and equity valuations across the sector have compressed.

Analysts at Standard Chartered recently warned that the sustainability of many crypto treasury companies hinges on their ability to maintain a premium valuation relative to their underlying Bitcoin holdings, commonly measured by market net asset value. That premium has become increasingly difficult to sustain amid current market conditions.

Related: Crypto’s 2026 investment playbook: Bitcoin, stablecoin infrastructure, tokenized assets