A movement in horror that began nearly a decade ago seems to have come full circle, with the pioneering movie of this wave being overtaken at the box office by a new hit. The new film’s success also serves as a passing-of-the-baton moment between two generations of horror filmmakers. The first generation, the millennials, were shown the way by Ari Aster, who broke out with Hereditary in 2018. The new Gen Z horror filmmakers all honed their craft on YouTube. The most successful of the bunch, Curry Barker, is just 26 years old. The youngest of this new wave of horror directors is Kane Parsons, who was hired to direct the upcoming and now critically acclaimed movie Backrooms when he was still a teenager.
Ahead of Backrooms‘ imminent debut, it’s Barker’s movie that has emerged as an industry-altering hit. We’re talking, of course, about Obsession. The movie exceeded box-office expectations in its opening weekend and then pulled off the unprecedented achievement of delivering a higher second-weekend gross. Not only did it earn more in its sophomore frame than it did in its first, but Obsession also delivered a jump of 36% — it’s a record that will probably not be broken for quite some time. It’s extremely rare for a wide release to deliver an increase in its box office revenue, but a 36% bump is genuinely unheard of.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Horror Survival Quiz Which Horror Villain Do You Have the Best Chance of Surviving? Jason Voorhees · Michael Myers · Freddy Krueger · Pennywise · Chucky
Advertisement
Five killers. Five completely different ways to die — if you’re not smart enough, fast enough, or self-aware enough to avoid it. Only one of them is the villain your particular set of instincts gives you a fighting chance against. Eight questions will figure out which one.
🏕️Jason
🔪Michael
💤Freddy
🎈Pennywise
Advertisement
🪆Chucky
Advertisement
01
Something feels wrong. You can’t explain it — you just know. What do you do? First instincts are the difference between the survivor and the first act casualty.
Advertisement
02
Where are you most likely to find yourself when things go wrong? Setting is everything in horror. Where you are determines which rules apply.
Advertisement
03
What is your most reliable survival asset? Every survivor has a quality the villain didn’t account for. What’s yours?
Advertisement
04
What kind of fear is hardest for you to fight through? Knowing your weakness is the first step to not dying because of it.
Advertisement
05
You’re with a group when things start going wrong. What’s your role? Horror movies are brutally clear about who survives group situations and who doesn’t.
Advertisement
06
What’s the horror movie mistake you’re most likely to make? Honest self-assessment is a survival skill. Denial is not.
Advertisement
07
What’s your best weapon against something that can’t be stopped by conventional means? Every horror villain has a weakness. The survivors are always the ones who find it.
Advertisement
08
It’s the final scene. You’re the last one standing. How did you make it? The final survivor always has a reason. What’s yours?
Advertisement
Your Survival Odds Have Been Calculated Your Best Chance Is Against…
Your instincts, your strengths, and your particular way of thinking under pressure point to one villain you actually have a fighting chance against. Everyone else — good luck.
Advertisement
Camp Crystal Lake · Friday the 13th
Jason Voorhees
Jason is relentless, but he is also predictable — and that is the gap you would exploit.
He moves in straight lines toward his target. He doesn’t strategise, doesn’t adapt, doesn’t outsmart. He simply pursues.
Your ability to keep moving, use the environment, and resist the panic that freezes most victims gives you a genuine edge.
The Crystal Lake survivors were always the ones who stopped running in circles and started thinking about terrain, water, and distance.
You think like that. Which means Jason, for all his indestructibility, would face someone who simply refused to be where he expected.
Advertisement
Haddonfield, Illinois · Halloween
Michael Myers
Michael watches before he moves. He is patient, methodical, and almost impossible to detect — until it’s too late for anyone who isn’t paying close enough attention.
But you are paying attention. You notice the shape in the window, the car parked slightly wrong, the silence where there should be sound.
Michael’s power lies in the invisibility of ordinary suburbia — the fact that nothing ever looks wrong until it already is.
Your spatial awareness and instinct to map every room, every exit, and every shadow before you need them is precisely the quality Laurie Strode had.
You are not a victim waiting to happen. You are someone who already suspects something is wrong — and acts on it.
Advertisement
Elm Street · A Nightmare on Elm Street
Freddy Krueger
Freddy wins by getting inside your head — using your own fears, your own memories, your own subconscious as weapons against you. That strategy requires a target who can be destabilised.
You are harder to destabilise than most. You’ve faced uncomfortable truths about yourself and you haven’t looked away.
The survivors on Elm Street were always the ones who understood what was happening and chose to face it rather than flee from it.
Freddy’s greatest weakness is that his power evaporates in the presence of someone who refuses to give him the fear he feeds on.
Your psychological resilience — the ability to stay grounded when reality itself becomes unreliable — is exactly the quality that keeps you alive here.
Advertisement
Derry, Maine · It
Pennywise
Pennywise is ancient, shapeshifting, and feeds on terror — but it has one critical vulnerability: it cannot function against someone who genuinely stops being afraid of it.
The Losers Club didn’t survive because they were braver than everyone else. They survived because they faced their fears together, and faced them honestly.
You ask the questions others avoid. You look directly at what frightens you rather than turning away.
That directness — the refusal to let fear fester in the dark — is Pennywise’s worst nightmare.
It chose the wrong target when it chose you. You are exactly the kind of person whose fear tastes like nothing at all.
Advertisement
Chicago · Child’s Play
Chucky
Chucky’s greatest advantage is that nobody takes him seriously until it’s already too late. He exploits the gap between how something looks and what it actually is.
You don’t have that gap. You take threats seriously regardless of how they present — and you never make the mistake of underestimating something because of its size or appearance.
Chucky relies on surprise, on the delay between recognition and response. You close that delay faster than almost anyone.
Your instinct to treat every unfamiliar thing with appropriate scepticism — rather than dismissing it because it seems absurd — is the exact quality that keeps you breathing.
Against Chucky, not laughing is already winning. You are very good at not laughing.
Advertisement
Here’s How Much ‘Obsession’ Has Grossed at the Box Office So Far
Thanks to its record-breaking performance in less than two weeks of release, Obsession has grossed around $85 million at the worldwide box office. This is already more than 100 times its reported budget of $750,000, which makes it one of the most successful movies of all time by return on investment. By comparison, Paranormal Activity grossed nearly $200 million on a budget of $450,000 and The Blair Witch Project grossed around $250 million on a budget of around $750,000. With a 95% Rotten Tomatoes score, Obsession is overtaking the $90 million lifetime haul of Hereditary as we speak, and it should comfortably pass the coveted $100 million mark worldwide this weekend. It’ll face direct competition from Backrooms, which is expected to break A24’s opening weekend box office record on the strength of incredible pre-release buzz and positive reviews. If projections hold, it will surpass Hereditary‘s lifetime domestic haul in three days. Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.
Gwyneth Paltrow is getting honest about the emotional challenges of adjusting to an empty nest after her children moved out of the family home.
The lifestyle mogul candidly described the overwhelming transition as a painful drop that required a complete reorientation of her daily life and motherhood duties.
However, despite the initial sadness, the famous actress expressed immense pride in how her adult children are successfully entering their next phases of life.
Advertisement
Lee Watt/AFF-USA.COM / MEGA
The 53-year-old Goop founder recently shared her vulnerable parenting journey during a candid interview on the Today Show. Reflecting on the departure of her kids, whom she shares with her ex-husband, Chris Martin, she confessed that the change was incredibly difficult to navigate.
“I really struggled when they all went, and then I thought, ‘Okay, I’m all good,’ ” she admitted.
However, the relief was temporary, as she added, “And then in September again, I kind of fell off a cliff for the second time. But now I feel like it’s what you want to happen. It’s what you hope will happen that they will go off to their next phase of life and find their people.”
The Academy Award winner explained that mothers spend years heavily focusing on their children’s daily schedules and emotional well-being, making it very hard to reorient when they leave. Fortunately, both of her adult children are thriving in their respective journeys.
Her 22-year-old daughter, Apple Martin, graduated from Vanderbilt University and has already secured a role in an upcoming Nancy Meyers film. Meanwhile, her 20-year-old son, Moses Martin, is a sophomore at Brown University and is successfully building a music career.
Advertisement
Instagram | Gwyneth Paltrow
The thriving post-college journeys of Paltrow’s children have naturally pushed them further into the intense media spotlight.
Following her recent university graduation and the announcement of her upcoming movie role, the Oscar winner’s eldest daughter is now drawing significant attention to her personal life after uploading a candid-looking snapshot to her Instagram Stories featuring a dark-haired mystery man.
In the relaxed image, she leaned her head back outside what appeared to be a traditional pub while her companion wrapped an arm around her. According to The Blast, the casual photo immediately sent fans into detective mode online because she offered absolutely no caption or tags to identify the man.
The timing of the post intensified the romance questions because the model had also recently interacted online with a former classmate named Andrew Smith.
Adding to the mystery, another dark-haired man was spotted walking closely behind the graduate and her famous mother during the university’s commencement festivities just days earlier.
Advertisement
Apple Martin Rejected False Claims Of School Expulsion
MEGA
The intense public curiosity surrounding Apple’s romantic life and transition into adulthood follows previous instances where she had to defend her character on social media.
Months before sparking dating rumors with her cozy photograph, Paltrow’s eldest daughter faced harsh online scrutiny regarding her past school days.
The young model utilized her Instagram stories to firmly push back against growing internet claims that she had been kicked out of school for bullying other students. Addressing the rumors, she reshared a comment she had previously written.
In the public statement, she made her stance completely clear, writing, “Hi! I didn’t wanna respond, but this narrative is completely false and has gotten so out of hand,” according to The Blast.
The recent graduate strongly disputed the online allegations and clarified that she has a completely clean academic record. She further acknowledged that being in the public eye means facing critics, but insisted that the malicious rumor crossed a line.
Advertisement
Gwyneth Paltrow Faced Backlash Over Controversial Advertisement
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
While Apple has had to protect her personal reputation from false online rumors, her famous mother has simultaneously been dealing with significant public pushback over her latest business choices.
The 53-year-old actress sparked fresh controversy after her health-focused delivery restaurant launched a social media campaign featuring convicted fraudster Anna Delvey. Delvey gained notoriety for posing as a wealthy heiress to scam elite social circles, banks, and hotels before serving 19 months in prison and being placed under house arrest in New York City.
However, the promotional video drew heavy criticism for seemingly glamorizing criminal behavior for commercial gain, as reported by The Blast.
Mega
The negative response to the restaurant’s advertisement coincided directly with a separate wave of public condemnation regarding Paltrow’s personal views on wealth.
The wellness entrepreneur sparked a heated cultural debate after sitting down with business journalist Kara Swisher for a recent episode of “The Goop Podcast.”
The Blast reported that during their recorded conversation, the Oscar-winning actress reflected heavily on Silicon Valley power players, questioning the public’s ongoing fascination with powerful tech executives. Questioning the shifting values of modern society, the actress asked, “How did we get here as a culture?”
Advertisement
However, the commentary immediately backfired online, with numerous social media users blasting the millionaire actress for being completely out of touch with everyday financial realities.
Throughout eight seasons of Game of Thrones, some characters went from being fan favorites to all-around TV icons. Among them, of course, was Lena Headey‘s Cersei Lannister, a cutthroat leader who’s hungry for power and fiercely protective of her family. Headey played Cersei with precision, making viewers scream in their seats at some of her most narcissistic moments, yet also feel for her in her most vulnerable ones (“Shame! Shame!”).
And, ever since Game of Thrones wrapped back in 2019, Headey has continued to be a part of some memorable projects, many of which are far from her power-grabbing shenanigans in Westeros. Among her projects is Beacon 23, a psychological sci-fi thriller series on MGM+ that first released in 2023. The series, which was canceled after Season 2, received a lukewarm reception from viewers and critics alike, but is definitely still a worthwhile watch for fans of Headey’s work.
Advertisement
What Is ‘Beacon 23’ About?
Set in the 23rd century, Beacon 23 sees Headey as Aster, a government agent of some kind whose ship has crashed, and she finds herself trapped in one of many Beacons that serve as a lighthouse for intergalactic travelers. There, she meets stoic veteran Halan (Stephan James), and while there are suspicions and animosity between them at first, the two soon realize that they might benefit more from being friends than foes. With only the structure’s artificial intelligence to serve as company, Aster and Halan need to work together to understand each other, rely on one another and together defend themselves against “The Artifact,” a strange cosmic object that affects people psychologically and physically.
By Season 2 of the series, which premiered in April 2024, Aster and Halan’s Beacon has been turned into a prison. “Without a clear path forward, the inhabitants of Beacon 23 must rely on each other, but their conflicting agendas may get in the way,” the official synopsis teased. The series, which was based on the 2016 novel by the same name by Hugh Howey, was created by Zak Penn, and also stars Natasha Mumba, Eric Lange, Ellen Wong, Wade Bogert-O’Brien, and Bo Martynowska.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Personality Quiz Which Sci-Fi Hero Are You Most Like? Paul Atreides · Captain Kirk · Princess Leia · Ellen Ripley · Max Rockatansky
Five iconic heroes. Five completely different ways of facing an impossible universe. One of them shares your instincts, your values, and your particular way of refusing to back down. Eight questions will tell you which one.
🏜️Paul Atreides
Advertisement
🖖Capt. Kirk
✊Princess Leia
🔦Ellen Ripley
🔥Max Rockatansky
Advertisement
01
Advertisement
How do you lead when the stakes couldn’t be higher? The way you lead under pressure is the most honest thing about you.
02
Advertisement
What is your greatest strength in a crisis? The quality that keeps you alive when everything else fails.
03
Advertisement
What is the thing you’d sacrifice everything else for? Your deepest motivation is your truest compass.
04
Advertisement
How do you relate to the people around you? Who you are to others under pressure is who you really are.
05
Advertisement
You’re facing a threat that no one else believes is real. What do you do? How you respond when you’re the only one who sees it defines everything.
06
Advertisement
What has your heroism cost you personally? Every hero pays. The question is what — and whether they’d pay it again.
07
Advertisement
How do you feel about the rules of the world you’re in? Every hero has a relationship with the system. What’s yours?
08
Advertisement
When everything is on the line, what keeps you going? The answer is the most honest thing about you.
Your Hero Has Been Identified Your Sci-Fi Hero Is…
Advertisement
Your answers point to the iconic sci-fi hero who shares your instincts, your values, and your particular way of facing the impossible.
Arrakis · Dune
Advertisement
Paul Atreides
You carry a weight most people would crumble under — the knowledge of what you’re capable of, and the burden of what you might have to become.
You see further ahead than others and you plan accordingly, even when the vision frightens you.
You are driven by loyalty to your people and a sense of destiny you didn’t ask for but can’t escape.
Paul Atreides is not simply a hero — he is someone who understands the cost of power and chooses to bear it anyway.
That gravity, that willingness to carry what others won’t, is exactly you.
USS Enterprise · Star Trek
Advertisement
Captain Kirk
You lead with instinct, warmth, and an absolute refusal to accept a no-win scenario — because you’ve always believed there’s a third option nobody else has thought of yet.
You take the mission seriously without ever taking yourself too seriously.
Your crew would follow you anywhere, not because you demand it, but because you’ve earned it.
Kirk’s genius isn’t tactical — it’s human. He reads people, bends rules with purpose, and wills outcomes into existence through sheer conviction.
That combination of warmth, audacity, and relentless optimism is unmistakably yours.
The Rebellion · Star Wars
Advertisement
Princess Leia
You are the kind of person who holds the line when everyone else is losing faith — not because you’re fearless, but because giving up simply isn’t something you’re capable of.
You lead through conviction. Your voice carries because your belief is unshakeable.
You gave up everything ordinary the moment you chose the cause, and you’ve never looked back.
Leia is not a supporting character in her own story — she is the moral centre of the entire rebellion.
That same fierce, principled, unbreakable core is what defines you.
The Nostromo · Alien
Advertisement
Ellen Ripley
You are not reckless, not grandiose, and not particularly interested in being anyone’s hero — you just refuse to stop when it matters.
You see threats clearly, you document the truth even when no one listens, and when the time comes you handle it yourself.
Ripley’s heroism is earned, not performed. She doesn’t have a speech — she has a flamethrower and a plan.
You share her composure under the worst possible pressure, and her refusal to pretend the monster isn’t there.
When it counts, you don’t flinch. That’s everything.
The Wasteland · Mad Max
Advertisement
Max Rockatansky
You have been through fire that would break most people — and what came out the other side is something the world underestimates at its peril.
You don’t ask for help, don’t need validation, and don’t wait for anyone to tell you the rules no longer apply.
Your loyalty, when it finally arrives, is absolute — but it’s earned in silence and tested in action, not in words.
Max is not a nihilist. He is someone who lost everything and found, against his will, that he still has something worth protecting.
That bruised, stubborn, ultimately human core is exactly yours.
Advertisement
‘Beacon 23’ Received Mixed Reviews
Stephan James and Lena Headey in Beacon 23.Image via MGM+
Ever since its release, Beacon 23 has received mixed reviews from critics and viewers alike. On Rotten Tomatoes, for instance, some critics point out the show’s slow pacing and “empty lore,” while others praise the series for having a more cerebral approach to the sci-fi genre. “Those with enough curiosity and patience to wait out its rough patches — and those with a taste for cerebral sci-fi — may find themselves falling under its plaintive spell,” wrote one review. “While the show is slower in its storytelling, each episode layers on the complications, culminating in an urgent and tense finale, that’s only hampered by its lack of answers,” asserted another.
In Collider’s very own review by Chase Hutchinson in 2023, the series received an underwhelming score of C. “Rather than reveling in the simplicity of two people trying to figure out what is going on while in the company of someone they may not trust, there is a repeated sense that narrative filler is being forced into the season to pad it out into eight episodes,” Hutchinson outlined. “Though a confined setting could become more thrilling if the characters in it were given more to work with, like with the other strong MGM+ series From, both Headey and James are saddled with a story that consistently drags them down until there is little to hold it together in the final stretch.”
With all that said, while the divisive reception and early cancelation might be enough to sway viewers away from the series, Beacon 23 is undoubtedly an interesting and intriguing addition to the sci-fi genre. With a cerebral tone and a focus on two characters learning whether they can trust each other, the series becomes much more than the dangers of space and intergalactic travel.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Release Date
2023 – 2024-00-00
Advertisement
Showrunner
Zak Penn
Directors
Advertisement
Daniel Percival, Lewin Webb, Erskine Forde, Oz Scott
Tom Hardy‘s firing from “MobLand” has become a major topic of conversation as more details surface about his time on set and relationship with other cast members.
According to a new report, the actor seemingly made things difficult for his co-workers and producers by choosing to remain in his trailer during filming.
Sources also previously stated that Tom Hardy’s behavior on set frustrated his A-list co-star, Helen Mirren, who felt “enraged” by his actions.
Advertisement
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
A new report from The Hollywood Reporter has shed light on the on-set tensions that may have caused a strain between not only Hardy and the producers of “MobLand,” but also his co-stars, Pierce Brosnan and Helen Mirren.
Speaking to the publication, a source claimed that Hardy put on an arrogant display when he refused to step out of his trailer for hours, keeping Brosnan and Mirren waiting and subsequently delaying filming.
“He refused to come out of his trailer for hours at a time,” the source stated, noting that the move left producers worried and made them rethink Hardy’s future on the series.
“He kept the cast waiting, [which is] a power play,” the source continued. “Keeping Pierce Brosnan, Helen Mirren, and others waiting is career suicide, I would wager.”
Hardy plays the role of fixer Harry Da Souza in the Guy Ritchie series, which has yet to be officially picked up for a third season.
Advertisement
Although it’s unclear why Hardy refused to leave his trailer on time, sources told the Daily Mail that he had grown frustrated with the filming schedule, especially as a third season might require filming beyond 2026.
The Actor Was Reportedly Axed From The Show After A Dispute Over The Filming Schedule
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA
In a chat with The Mail on Sunday, sources noted that a lot of the dispute centered on the filming schedule of the yet-to-be greenlit third season of “MobLand.”
“Producers told Tom they couldn’t start filming the new show until later in the year. They were looking at November time because they weren’t happy that the script was ready to go in time for the summer,” an insider told the news outlet, per the Daily Mail.
This is said to have clashed with Hardy’s own personal plans, as he has been “absolutely insistent that he is not working beyond 2026.”
The decision to delay filming reportedly infuriated the actor, as it meant he wouldn’t be done with the project before the new year.
Advertisement
Tom Hardy Reportedly Wanted His Schedule Clear So He Could Spend Quality Time With His Loved Ones
MEGA
Speaking more on the matter, sources noted that Hardy’s insistence on wrapping up filming of the third season early was tied to his decision to take a long break from Hollywood to be with his family.
The actor, who has been open about being physically worn out due to the challenging roles he took on in the past, reportedly communicated his desires to producers, but they remained adamant about the filming schedule.
“He has decided he wants to take time out from the industry and enjoy family time with Charlotte and the kids,” the source said. “They are discussing going abroad for a few years, leaving the limelight behind them.”
They added, “It has been a big decision for him and his family, so there was a hard stop. Tom tried to get his way and begin the filming this summer, but the directors were not agreeing, they said no.”
Hardy has been married to his wife, Charlotte Riley, since 2014, and the couple shares two children, a daughter and a son. Riley is also the stepmother to Hardy’s eldest child, Louis Thomas, from a previous relationship.
Advertisement
The Actor’s Behavior On Set ‘Enraged’ Helen Mirren
MEGA
Before news of his firing made headlines, insiders had already shared with the Daily Mail that one of his co-stars, Helen Mirren, had become “enraged” by Hardy’s behavior on set.
One source in particular shared that when the camera stopped rolling, Hardy was no longer “charming” or “calm” like the character he portrays on the show; instead, he was “quite the opposite.”
“He can be late to filming, too, and that is annoying for Dame Helen, who is extremely professional and disciplined. His tone is something Dame Helen doesn’t like, along with his lateness,” the source noted.
They further claimed that Hardy was “winding” up the Hollywood veteran with his “very, very arrogant” attitude, which clashed with the professionalism Mirren has grown to expect on the projects she works on.
Tom Hardy’s Firing Is Causing ‘A Headache’ For ‘MobLand’ Producers
News Licensing / MEGA
With Hardy playing a major role in the hit series as Harry Da Souza, his axing is unsurprisingly a major issue for the showrunners, especially regarding a third season.
An insider said, “It’s causing quite the headache to work out what they will do and how they will explain away Harry no longer being there.”
Advertisement
This may also cause the producers to push back filming a third season as they figure out how to continue the show without a character who has been integral to the first two installments.
“It’s a disaster, but the bosses were not prepared to be told what to do by Tom,” the insider continued. “Now the script might have to be redone, which could delay it even more.”
“The Real Housewives of Orange County” alum Kelly Doddis no stranger to controversy. However, the 50-year-old reality star is reportedly facing jail time following a revenge porn incident in 2025. Additionally, the “RHOC” alum is battling a separate legal hurdle as she was also accused of battery last year.
The accusations against Dodd came months after a very public fallout with her daughter, including a leaked voicemail from the controversial figure.
@parisamichelle / MEGA
TMZ obtained legal documents that show “The Real Housewives of Orange County” alum being accused of sharing footage of a Jane Doe in the act of masturbating and having sex without her consent. Specifically, the accusation is that Dodd “unlawfully and intentionally” distributed the images around August 29, 2025.
Since the alleged sharing of the footage, prosecutors say the woman has been impacted by severe emotional distress. Regarding the recording, Dodd is said to have taken the footage during a time when the woman would have had a reasonable expectation of privacy.
Advertisement
Kelly Is Accused Of Breaking An Agreement With The Alleged Victim
MEGA
Per TMZ, the court documents also show that Dodd had an agreement with Jane Doe. Despite having recorded the footage, she had vowed not to share the images. However, sometime around the time of the agreement, Dodd is reported to have contacted the woman, threatening her, her family, and her property.
That’s not all in regard to Dodd’s legal situation. The “RHOC” alum is also facing a battery charge stemming from a June 2025 incident with a different Jane Doe. Including both situations from last year, she’s facing three misdemeanors and possible jail time.
‘RHOC’ Fans Are Weighing In
MEGA
Fans of Dodd and her time on “The Real Housewives of Orange County” are weighing in after learning of the accusations against her. Overall, many have real concerns about the Bravo alum, citing what they call erratic behavior on social media. However, many others are calling it karma.
On X, someone proposed a theory about what may have happened. They surmised, based solely on their opinion, “Sounds like her and her hubby or just him had a side piece and then Kelly went nuts as usual.”
Another social media user said, “Revenge porn… actual charges…. Oh, karma is a b-tch for Kelly.” A different “RHOC” fan wrote, “You reap what you sow. She’s pathetic.”
Someone else joked, “Hopefully Spencer Pratt can pardon her since she and Rick are riding his d-ck so much and they don’t even live in LA.”
Advertisement
Another X user stated, “Kell Dodd is an awful person, and what she’s being accused of is true. However, despite that and despite her being a villain on the show, I’m deeply worried about her. Especially after the stuff with her daughter.”
Lastly, a fan wrote, “Kelly Dodd really needs help.”
A Voice Note Intended For Kelly Dodd’s Daughter Leaked In 2025
MEGA
In addition to the alleged revenge porn incident and the accusation of battery, Dodd had a very public war with her daughter, Jolie, in 2025. In November, a voice note from the “RHOC” alum to one of her then-19-year-old daughter’s friends found its way online.
For context, Dodd had been blocked by her daughter, so sending the voice note to her friend was her way of communicating with her.
She said in the leaked audio, “You just opened a Pandora’s box, Jolie. I have recordings of you, screaming at your dad because he isn’t taking you on vacation, screaming that he didn’t buy you a car. Do you remember those recordings that I saved? I have those, and I’m going to publicly put them out there. Do you understand?”
Advertisement
Elsewhere in the message, Dodd called her daughter a “dumb little girl” before saying, “You’re stupid, OK? For even thinking that you’re going to win.”
It’s Been Years Since Kelly Has Been On ‘RHOC’
ROMA / MEGA
Dodd announced in June 2021 that she would not be returning to “The Real Housewives of Orange County” for its 16th season. She joined the hit Bravo show in 2016. According to PEOPLE, Dodd said at the time on Twitter, “The last five years have been an amazing experience. The next five years will be even better.”
She added, “I am so grateful for all the love and support and so excited about the future #RHOC.” Since then, she’d been rumored to be returning to the show several times, but it has never materialized.
We seek out fantasy movies because they give us an escape from reality. Whether we journey to a place over the rainbow or head on a daring adventure to save Middle-earth, these fantasy films have provided us with a place to go beyond our wildest imaginations. But for every Mary Poppins, there is a Bedknobs and Broomsticks, a praiseworthy film that doesn’t get as much attention and adoration.
We are going to celebrate ten fantasy movies that you’ve been sleeping on. They’ve been around, and some might even have a cult following, but they are sadly not in the same conversation as the legends of the genre. From a ‘90s animated classic that millennials adore to a duo of Hugh Jackman films that were forgotten during his Wolverine reign, it’s time to wake up and turn on these iconic films.
Advertisement
‘Excalibur’ (1981)
Patrick Stewart in ExcaliburImage via Warner Bros.
The legend of King Arthur and the knights of the Round Table remains one of the most beloved stories. Having been retold countless ways throughout entertainment, there remains one sweeping epic medieval fantasy retelling that may be its grandest: Excalibur. Brought to life by John Boorman, Excalibur is loosely based on Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur and follows King Arthur (Nigel Terry) from his birth through his unification of England, the rise of Camelot, and the eventual downfall caused by love, betrayal, and magic.
Excalibur is a sweeping visual experience of epic proportions that relies heavily on the theme of destiny. Through the examination of the price of power and the inescapable presence of both good and evil in human nature, Excalibur reverberates through the mantra that “the king and the land are one.” What sets this iteration of the story apart is its operatic scope and lush Irish filming that made it a definitive sword-and-sorcery classic. Excalibur is a hypnotic, operatic cinematic achievement that revitalized the medieval genre in the ‘80s.
Advertisement
‘FernGully: The Last Rainforest’ (1992)
Image via 20th Century Studios
The fact that there is a generation that doesn’t revere FernGully: The Last Rainforest in the way that millennials do is a travesty. Directed by Bill Kroyer from a screenplay by Jim Cox, based on the FernGully stories by Diana Young, the musical fantasy flick follows a brave fairy named Crysta (Samantha Mathis) and her forest friends, including a manic, lovable fruit bat named Batty Koda (Robin Williams), as they battle to save their magical Australian rainforest home from a destructive logging crew and an ancient, pollution-fueled entity named Hexxus (Tim Curry).
FernGully bravely weaves a heartfelt, pro-environment message into a vibrant fantasy world that doesn’t diminish its message for younger audiences. Coming out just as the Disney Renaissance was surging, it became a niche film that fell by the wayside. Coincidentally, arriving a year before Aladdin, Williams’ eccentric character was almost instantly overshadowed by his iconic role as the Genie. Nevertheless, looking back, FernGully is a visually remarkable work, as the bioluminescent, fairy-filled world gave young viewers hope that perhaps magic might live in their own backyards.
Advertisement
‘Krull’ (1983)
Image via Columbia Pictures
You have most likely been sleeping on Peter Yates’ science fantasy adventure movie, Krull. The movie tells the story of Prince Colwyn (Ken Marshall), who embarks on a quest to rescue his bride, Princess Lyssa (Lysette Anthony), from a fearsome alien warlord known as The Beast. But first, Colwyn, alongside a merry band of misfit warriors, magicians, and outlaws, must locate and retrieve a mythical, five-bladed throwing star known as the Glaive, the only weapon capable of destroying the monster.
Krull mixed two distinct genres: high fantasy, including swords, castles, prophecies, and magic, and science fiction, featuring alien spaceships, lasers, and telepaths. Regardless, the unique premise gave Krull a unique identity as a wildly entertaining medieval fantasy quest set in space. With a bold imagination and a classic Dungeons-and-Dragons-style party, Krull may have simply been ahead of its time, but it deserves immense praise for its world-building. From the weaponry to the Black Fortress, this 1980s gem is unforgettable.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Middle-earth Quiz Which Lord of the Rings Character Are You? One Quiz · Ten Questions · Your Fate Revealed
Advertisement
The road goes ever on. From the green hills of the Shire to the fires of Mount Doom, every soul in Middle-earth carries a destiny. Ten questions stand between you and the truth of who you are. Answer honestly — the One Ring has a way of revealing what we most want to hide.
💍Frodo
🌿Samwise
👑Aragorn
🔥Gandalf
Advertisement
🏹Legolas
⚒️Gimli
👁️Sauron
🪨Gollum
Advertisement
01
Advertisement
You are handed a responsibility that could destroy you. What do you do? The weight of the world falls on unlikely shoulders.
02
Advertisement
Your closest companion is heading into terrible danger. You: True loyalty is revealed not in comfort, but in crisis.
03
Advertisement
Enormous power is within your reach. Your instinct is: Power corrupts — but only those who reach for it.
04
Advertisement
What does “home” mean to you? Where we long to return reveals who we truly are.
05
Advertisement
When a battle is upon you, your approach is: War reveals what we are made of — whether we like it or not.
06
Advertisement
Someone comes to you for advice in their darkest hour. You: Wisdom is not knowing all the answers — it’s knowing which questions to ask.
07
Advertisement
How do you see yourself, honestly? Self-knowledge is the most dangerous kind.
08
Advertisement
Which of these best describes your relationship with the natural world? Middle-earth speaks to those who know how to listen.
09
Advertisement
You encounter a wretched, pitiable creature who has done terrible things. You: How we treat the fallen reveals the height of our character.
10
Advertisement
When the quest is over and the songs are sung, what do you hope they say about you? In the end, we are all just stories.
The Fellowship Has Spoken Your Place in Middle-earth
Advertisement
The scores below reveal your true character. Your highest number is your match. Even a tie tells a story — the Fellowship was never made of simple people.
💍 Frodo
🌿 Samwise
Advertisement
👑 Aragorn
🔥 Gandalf
🏹 Legolas
⚒️ Gimli
Advertisement
👁️ Sauron
🪨 Gollum
You carry something heavy — and you carry it alone, even when you don’t have to. You were not born for greatness, and that is precisely why greatness chose you. Your courage is not the roaring, sword-swinging kind; it is quiet, stubborn, and terrifying in its refusal to quit. The Ring weighs on you more than anyone can see, and still you walk toward the fire. That is not weakness. That is the rarest kind of strength there is.
Advertisement
You are, without question, the best of them. Not the most powerful, not the most celebrated — but the most essential. Your loyalty is not a trait; it is a force of nature. You would carry the person you love up the slopes of Mount Doom if it came to that, and we both know you’d do it without being asked. The world needs more people like you, and the world is lucky it has even one.
You were born to lead, and you have spent years running from it. The crown is yours by right, but you know better than anyone that right means nothing without the will and the worthiness to back it up. You are tempered by loss, shaped by long roads, and defined by a code of honour you hold to even when no one is watching. When you finally step forward, the world shifts. Because it was always waiting for you.
Advertisement
You have seen more than you let on, and you say less than you know — which is exactly as it should be. You are a catalyst: you do not fight the battles yourself, you ignite the people who can. Your wisdom comes not from books but from an age of watching what happens when it is ignored. You arrive precisely when you mean to, and your presence alone changes what is possible. A wizard is never late.
Graceful, perceptive, and almost preternaturally calm under pressure — you see things others miss and act before others react. You do not need to make a scene to be remarkable; your presence speaks for itself. You are loyal to those you choose to stand beside, and that choice is not made lightly. You have lived long enough to know that the most beautiful things in this world are also the most fragile, and that is why you fight to protect them.
Advertisement
You are loud, proud, and absolutely formidable — and beneath all of that is one of the most fiercely loyal hearts in Middle-earth. You don’t do anything by half measures. Your friendships are forged like iron, your grudges run as deep as mines, and your courage in battle is the kind that makes legends. You came into this fellowship suspicious of everyone and ended it willing to die for an elf. That is not a small thing. That is everything.
You think in centuries and act in absolutes. Order, dominion, control — not because you are cruel by nature, but because you have decided that the world left to itself always falls apart, and you are the only one with the vision and the will to hold it together. You were not always this. Something was lost, or taken, or betrayed, and the version of you that stands now is the answer to that wound. The tragedy is that you’re not entirely wrong — just entirely too far gone to course-correct.
Advertisement
You are a study in contradiction — pitiable and dangerous, cunning and broken, capable of both cruelty and something that once resembled love. You are defined by loss: of innocence, of self, of the one thing that gave your existence meaning. Two voices war inside you constantly, and the tragedy is that the better one sometimes wins, just not often enough, and never at the right moment. You are a warning, yes — but also a mirror. We are all a little Gollum, given the right ring and enough time.
Advertisement
‘Bedknobs and Broomsticks’ (1971)
Miss Price, Mr. Brown, and the children under the sea riding on a bed in Bedknobs and BroomsticksImage via Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures
Advertisement
Bedknobs and Broomstickswill forever be overshadowed by Mary Poppins. That said, leave it on its own, and the adaptation of the Mary Norton books is quite divine. Directed by Robert Stevenson, the fantasy film tells the story of Carrie, Charlie, and Paul Rawlins (Cindy O’Callaghan, Ian Weighill, and Roy Snart), three orphaned siblings, who are evacuated to a small village and placed in the care of Miss Eglantine Price (Angela Lansbury), an apprentice witch. Together with a cynical magic correspondence professor, they embark on a magical, flying-bed adventure to find an ancient spell to help defend England from Nazi invaders.
With a delightful songbook from the Sherman Brothers and magical set pieces that give the film flight, Bedknobs and Broomsticksblends a dark period of history with the whimsy of Disney for an enchanting tale. Though it may seem like a heavy moment to use as a means for a story, it only helps to serve as a fun, empowering fantasy where everyday heroes rise to the occasion. Like Mary Poppins before it, the whimsical numbers and locales bring the story to sensational places. Lansbury established herself as a fledgling Disney legend through this performance. What child didn’t want to hop on an enchanted bed to the Isle of Naboombu, only for her to sing us to sleep decades later as Mrs. Potts in Beauty and the Beast?
‘Legend’ (1985)
Image via Universal Pictures
Advertisement
In 1985, Ridley Scott gave Tom Cruise a new genre big break in the epic dark fantasy adventure Legend. An ‘80s team-up you likely never knew you needed in a film you might not have known existed, Legend tells the tale of a pure-hearted forest dweller named Jack (Cruise) who must stop the Lord of Darkness (Tim Curry) from destroying the last unicorns. After a goblin strikes a unicorn, plunging the world into a freezing winter, Jack and his elven allies set out to defeat Darkness and rescue Princess Lili (Mia Sara).
Scott’s reign as a top-rated director usually doesn’t include Legend, but his work on the film is quite profound. His meticulous storytelling shines through the lush, sun-dappled forests, glowing unicorns, and eerie, firelit dungeons. In a time before CGI, the makeup design was unfathomable, and legendary makeup artist Rob Bottin’s work on characters, including Meg Mucklebones (Robert Picardo) and the Goblin minions, is truly sublime. However, Legend‘s crowning achievement comes in the creation of the Lord of Darkness. Covered in massive prosthetics and enormous horns, his jaw-dropping look, Curry’s evocative portrayal ranks as one of his very best crafted characters.
‘Pleasantville’ (1998)
Betty (Joan Allen) stands up for herself in ‘Pleasantville’.Image via New Line Cinema
Advertisement
Directed by Gary Ross, Pleasantville follows two teenage siblings, David and Jennifer (Tobey Maguire and Reese Witherspoon), who find themselves trapped in Pleasantville, a beloved black-and-white series set in the ’50s. As they introduce modern, emotional, and sexual experiences to the repressed, idyllic town, the residents and their world begin to change, turning from black and white to color.
Using the changing worlds as an allegory for social change, Pleasantville tackles racism, censorship, repression, and the danger of forced conformity through a fantastical premise. Beneath the lighthearted exterior, the story captures the illusions of perfection, the fear of change, and the power of civil rights on the evolution of society. As the characters begin to experience real feelings, thoughts, and passions, their monochrome world transforms into the vibrant colors of freedom. Not only does the film provide brilliant performances from a young Witherspoon and Maguire, but it also boasts dynamic turns from Jeff Daniels, Joan Allen, and William H. Macy.
‘The Beastmaster’ (1982)
Marc Singer as Dar in ‘The Beastmaster.’Image via MGM
Advertisement
If you see it as a cheesy, low-rent version of Conan the Barbarian, no wonder The Beastmaster has been slept on. But if you take the Don Coscarelli-directed film at face value as its own thing, then it is quite fantastic. Based on the 1959 science fiction novel The Beast Master by Alice “Andre” Norton, the sword-and-sorcery film follows Dar (Marc Singer), a warrior born with the telepathic ability to communicate with animals. After a cult of fanatic barbarians destroys his village, Dar sets out on a quest for revenge against the evil high priest, Maax (Rip Torn).
A story of revenge led by a charismatic hero and scene-stealing trained animals, The Beastmaster is an earnest B-movie that captures the pure joy of the high-fantasy era. Dar is a fun protagonist, but his ability to telepathically communicate with animals is the complete and utter draw. His loyal squad—which includes a majestic tiger, an eagle, and a pair of mischievous thieving ferrets—gives the movie a unique twist and delightful charm. Then, in the terrifying department, Torn’s over-the-top performance as the evil wizard Maax and the nightmarish winged Death Guards lead to a memorable tonal blend of fantasy and body horror. The Beastmaster serves as an important blueprint for this action-adventure style.
‘The Fountain’ (2006)
Hugh Jackman in one of the climatic scenes of The Fountain.Image via Warner Bros. Pictures
Advertisement
Some audiences like movies that are simple and straightforward, but if you’re seeking out a Darren Aronofsky project, you’ll be hard-pressed to find it. One of his lesser-remembered films of the early aughts is the Hugh Jackman and Rachel Weisz-led epic sci-fi fantasy romance The Fountain. A visually philosophical drama, The Fountain weaves together three distinct timelines spanning a thousand years, centering around a man (Jackman) trying to save the woman he loves (Weisz).
Through the intertwining tales, The Fountain undergoes masterful twists and turns, leading to the realization that death is not a curse but a road to rebirth and the continuation of life. In this tri-level transcendent epic, Aronofsky seamlessly combines an awe-inspiring visual stunner with genuine emotional depth and philosophy. Though the past is pretty, the magic in which Aronofsky crafts his space and cosmic sequence is mesmerizing. Add in a sweeping score by Clint Mansell and Jackman and Weisz delivering remarkable, weighty performances, and The Fountain retains its epic status as a near-perfect, ambitious blend of fantasy and sci-fi with emotional depth.
‘Van Helsing’ (2004)
The truth is, in the first decade of the 21st century, we simply could not imagine Hugh Jackman as anyone but Wolverine. In turn, it was a harder sell to see him in any other type of project. And yet, he not only held his own, but he also dominated in Stephen Sommers’ action-packed Van Helsing. A product of its time and an homage to the Universal Monsters of the past, Van Helsing casts Jackman as Gabriel Van Helsing, an amnesic Vatican-commissioned monster hunter who travels to Transylvania, teaming up with Anna Valerious (Kate Beckinsale), the last of an ancient family sworn to kill Count Dracula (Richard Roxburgh) and Frankenstein’s (Shuler Hensley) monster.
Advertisement
If it sounds like an apocalyptic and convoluted plot, well, it is, and that’s why it’s a delicious dumb popcorn flick. Fulfilling the horror fantasy quota, Van Helsing acts as a pulp action classic that mixes monster lore with pure unadulterated camp. It’s a “greatest hits” type of story that is visually mesmerizing. Coming off the success of The Mummy and its successors, Van Helsing had a high bar to achieve. It may not have reached it, but it earned a cult classic moniker in the process. Audiences are certainly never going to be bored as it’s wall-to-wall physics-defying stunts and high-energy action.
‘Willow’ (1988)
Warwick Davis as Willow spreading his arms in joy in Willow.Image via MGM
Willow is absolutely the film you’ve heard about that you’ve probably never taken the time to sit down and watch, and that’s a shame. The classic high fantasy tale tells the story of an aspiring sorcerer and farmer named Willow Ufgood (Warwick Davis), who discovers an infant prophesied to destroy the evil Queen Bavmorda (Jean Marsh). Willow then teams up with rogue warrior Madmartigan (Val Kilmer) to protect the baby from dark magical forces. Filled with high fantasy tropes galore, Willow is just as charming now as it was then.
Advertisement
Beloved by all who watch, the film is the brainchild of director Ron Howard, writer Bob Dolman, and was executive-produced by George Lucas. If that’s not a dream team, I don’t know what is. Willow showcases an underdog story and an unlikely hero’s journey. It was quite progressive for its time, allowing actors with dwarfism to step into fully fleshed-out roles as central heroes, rather than strictly fantastical creature parts. As a work of cinema, Willow uses amazing practical creature designs and pioneering digital morphing technology that revolutionized cinematic technology. Years later, it received a Disney+ show, but things didn’t exactly end well for it.
Disaster movies get reduced to spectacle, body counts, collapsing buildings, tidal waves, panicked crowds, all the visible stuff. And yes, the visible stuff matters. A disaster movie with no scale, no momentum, no physical imagination is dead on arrival. But that is not why the great ones stay with you.
Think about it — why did 2012 become so big? World War Z? Because they had a huge real-life meaning to them. They were warm and grounded. They stayed because disaster is one of the purest story machines in cinema for exposing what people are really made of once normal life loses authority. Vanity, courage, bureaucracy, tenderness, selfishness, class, romance, cowardice, sacrifice, denial, all of it gets dragged into the open the second the world stops pretending it is stable. These 10 movies kinda had that but perhaps not enough star-power or social media hype to back them up.
Advertisement
10
‘Juggernaut’ (1974)
Image via United Artists
I will always go to bat for Juggernaut. It understands that disaster does not need flames everywhere to be suffocating. Sometimes all you need is one luxury liner, a bomb threat, the sea, and enough procedural detail to make every passing minute feel like a tightening wire. That is what this movie gets exactly right. The danger is not abstract. It has shape. Explosives on a ship full of people. A bomb disposal expert coming aboard. Time, water, class performance, panic, all boxed together. It becomes one of those films where every corridor starts looking like a moral test.
And what really gives it force is the grown-up seriousness of the ensemble. Nobody is playing the material like camp. Anthony Fallon (Richard Harris), Captain Alex Brunel (Omar Sharif), and Charlie Braddock (David Hemmings) all give the movie this weary, competent, deeply British tension that makes the whole thing feel more frightening. The rich passengers, the workers, the crew, the politicians on land, all are part of the same system now, and that system is balanced on the possibility of one wrong wire. Juggernaut is a disaster film for people who love process as suspense. It is calm, intelligent, and nasty in exactly the right way.
Advertisement
9
‘The Rains Came’ (1939)
Image via 20th Century Fox
There is something magnificent about how openly emotional The Rains Came is. It belongs to that older kind of disaster cinema where romance, melodrama, social upheaval, disease, weather, and death are all allowed to crowd the same frame without apologizing to one another. The setting matters too. Colonial India in crisis gives the whole movie a richer moral texture than “storm hits town” would have on its own. The rains are not just weather. They are the beginning of a vast stripping-away. Vanity collapses. Social hierarchies wobble. People reveal what they really are when the floodwaters rise and sickness follows.
The film lets catastrophe transform the emotional meaning of everything around it. Characters who seemed trapped inside drawing-room identities suddenly have to exist inside urgency, service, fear, and loss. There is old-Hollywood grandeur all over it, yes, but the movie earns its bigness. It knows a disaster can be both spectacular and spiritually corrective. That is why it feels potent.
Advertisement
8
‘San Francisco’ (1936)
Image via Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
This one is such an old film but a beautiful reminder that the classic-Hollywood disaster movie did not think intimacy and scale were enemies. San Francisco spends so much of its time building a whole social world, saloons, opera aspirations, rough men, refined spaces, love, ambition, money, spiritual conflict, that by the time the earthquake arrives, the city actually feels inhabited. That matters enormously. So many disaster films fail because they think the event is enough.
San Francisco understands the event only becomes overwhelming once you have built something for it to break. And once the earthquake comes, it really comes. The destruction still has force, and the chaos afterward has that old apocalyptic-Hollywood terror where civilization looks frighteningly fragile. But what makes the film great instead of merely historically impressive is the emotional aftershock. Lives are not just interrupted. They are reweighted. The city’s collapse becomes a test of what remains when glamour, vice, social position, and personal illusions all get flattened together in the same rubble. There is something deeply moving about the way San Francisco treats communal suffering as both horror and reckoning.
Advertisement
7
‘The China Syndrome’ (1979)
Michael Douglas as Richard Adams, Jane Fonda as Kimberly Wells, and Daniel Valdez as Hector SalasImage via Columbia Pictures
I absolutely count The China Syndrome as a disaster movie, and one of the great ones, because it understands that disaster can exist in the gap between near-miss and inevitability. There is no giant wave. No building falling in the first half-hour. What you get instead is one of the most terrifying kinds of modern catastrophe: the kind built out of sealed systems, institutional denial, technological complexity, and the possibility that ordinary professional language is being used to keep the public calm while annihilation inches closer. That is nightmare material.
And because the movie is so grounded, it only gets more frightening with time. Kimberly Wells (Jane Fonda), Jack Godell (Jack Lemmon), and Richard Adams (Michael Douglas) give it exactly the right emotional range, ambition, conscience, media pressure, professional fear, whistleblower panic. The reactor itself becomes this invisible beast in the room, something most people cannot understand directly and therefore must trust others to manage. That trust is what the film attacks. A great disaster movie often asks whether human error, vanity, or bureaucracy will speed the catastrophe along. The China Syndrome asks that with a chill few films can match. It makes institutional calm feel sinister.
Advertisement
6
‘The Wave’ (2015)
Kristoffer Joner as Kristian and Silje Breivik as Anna hold hands as water crashes into the car they are sitting in in The WaveImage via Magnolia Pictures
What I respect about The Wave is how cleanly it merges two kinds of disaster-film pleasure that do not always coexist well: geological spectacle and family-level panic. The opening sections are almost deceptively ordinary. Scientists monitoring instability. family routines. local skepticism. That ordinariness is not filler. It is structural groundwork. When the mountain finally gives way and the fjord becomes a death corridor, the movie cashes in all that realism at once. Suddenly every siren, every road, every minute matters.
And the wave itself is terrifying because the film understands scale from the victim’s point of view. It is not just a pretty wall of CGI water. It is time running out in a place where the geography has become a trap. I also love how physical the aftermath feels, the flooding, the darkness, the cold, the search, the suffocation. Disaster movies often peak at the event and sag afterward. The Wave keeps its grip because it knows survival is not one beat. It is a series of awful, breath-limited decisions after the obvious climax has already happened. That makes it hit harder.
Advertisement
5
‘The Quake’ (2018)
Image via Nordisk Filmdistribusjon
The Quake is such a nasty companion piece to The Wave because it takes the emotional residue of the earlier film and drags it into another rupture instead of pretending trauma resets cleanly between sequels. That is one of the smartest choices it makes. The earthquake is not just an excuse to do the next round of destruction. It arrives in a life already marked by fear, obsession, and the humiliating possibility that everyone around you may think you are broken before they think you are right. That gives the first half real tension.
And when the quake finally hits, the film goes hard. Buildings split, interiors become death mazes, people are cut off in spaces that used to mean stability and now mean vertical ruin. The physical set pieces are excellent, but what I love most is the emotional tone underneath them. There is also a sadness to The Quake that a lot of disaster sequels never even attempt. The event is spectacular, yes, though the real story is about Kristian Eikjord (Kristoffer Joner) trying to protect his family while being crushed by the knowledge that he saw the shape of this terror coming and still could not make the world move fast enough. That kind of helplessness belongs to great disaster cinema.
Advertisement
4
‘Miracle Mile’ (1988)
Image via Hemdale Film Corporation
Miracle Mile is one of the most upsetting urban-apocalypse films ever made because it weaponizes ordinary time so cruelly. The setup is almost absurdly simple and perfect: Harry Washello (Anthony Edwards) answers a pay phone in the middle of the night and hears what may be a call meant for someone else, a warning that nuclear war is imminent. From there the whole movie becomes a race against disbelief. Is the call real? Is this panic justified? How fast can ordinary Los Angeles go from dreamy nocturnal drift to terminal unraveling? The answer is: horrifyingly fast.
What makes Miracle Mile so good is that it starts like a quirky romantic night movie. There is warmth in it, coincidence, possibility, strangers crossing paths, the kind of atmosphere where a date might genuinely change your life. Then the call comes, and suddenly every mundane part of city life becomes unstable. Cars. helicopters. traffic. police. crowds. misinformation. private selfishness. public terror. The film keeps tightening until it reaches a final movement so bleak and so perfect that it almost feels like a dare. This is not disaster as spectacle. It is disaster as emotional whiplash, the world ending in the middle of what should have been a love story.
Advertisement
3
‘These Final Hours’ (2013)
Nathan Phillips as James and Angourie Rice as Rose at a party in These Final HoursImage via Roadshow Films
This movie is brutal because it asks one of the ugliest questions any disaster film can ask: if the world is actually ending, what kind of person are you in the hours before meaning disappears? Not in the noble, speech-making way. In the real way. Do you turn toward pleasure? violence? numbness? rescue? obligation? panic? sex? family? self-erasure?These Final Hours is so good in that sense. It knows apocalypse is not only about fire in the sky. It is about moral collapse on the ground long before the blast reaches you just as you rother disaster favorites.
And the film’s emotional hook is viciously effective. James (Nathan Phillips) begins as a man trying to flee into selfish oblivion, then gets dragged toward responsibility through his connection with a child who should not have to navigate any of this. That relationship keeps the movie from becoming mere misery porn. It becomes a measure of whether any human decency can still exist when the clock is too short for future-oriented ethics. The answer is painful and partial and all the more moving because the movie does not sentimentalize it. This is one of the few end-of-the-world films that really feels like the end of the world.
Advertisement
2
‘Fail Safe’ (1964)
Henry Fonda as The President in FailsafeImage via Columbia Pictures
This is one of the most terrifying disaster films ever made precisely because almost nothing in it looks like disaster in the traditional sense. Rooms. phones. protocols. radar. voices. men in suits speaking with varying degrees of control while the world moves toward annihilation through systems that were supposed to prevent exactly this. That is the horror. The catastrophe is procedural. Human beings built structures to control apocalypse and then placed themselves one malfunction away from having to live inside its consequences.Fail Safe never blinks from that.
And what makes it so devastating is its moral seriousness. The performances are stripped of glamour in exactly the right way. The President (Henry Fonda), Professor Groeteschele (Walter Matthau), Colonel Cascio (Fritz Weaver), and Buck (Larry Hagman) all serve a movie that knows the most frightening thing about nuclear disaster is not only the explosion. It is the calm beforehand. The discussion. The recognition that logic, patriotism, decency, military doctrine, and human tenderness are all about to collide and at least one of them will not survive intact.
Advertisement
1
‘A Night to Remember’ (1958)
Robbie Lucas, played by John Merivale, carrying an unconscious passenger in A Night to RememberImage via The Rank Organisation
A Night to Remember is beautiful. It is one of the purest examples of disaster cinema understanding that the real scale of catastrophe is human behavior under collapse. Titanic has been retold so many times and so extravagantly that people can forget how shattering A Night to Remember still is. It does not need modern spectacle to devastate you. It has precision, sobriety, and a horrifyingly calm sense of process. You feel the ship’s size, yes, but even more you feel the terrible sequence by which denial becomes recognition, recognition becomes logistics, and logistics become mass death.
What makes it so great is its refusal to reduce the sinking to one sentimental corridor. Officers, crew, passengers, class divisions, stoic mistakes, cowardice, discipline, noise, silence, freezing water, all of it is allowed to coexist. The film understands disaster as systems failure and as human revelation. Some people become admirable. Some become pathetic. Most become frighteningly ordinary under extraordinary pressure, which is exactly right. And because the film never overplays its hand, every lifeboat, every delay, every missed chance lands harder. It is one of the greatest disaster movies ever made, period.
Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz Which Oscar Best Picture Is Your Perfect Movie? Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Advertisement
Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.
🪜Parasite
🌀Everything Everywhere
☢️Oppenheimer
🐦Birdman
Advertisement
🪙No Country for Old Men
Advertisement
01
What kind of film experience do you actually want? The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.
Advertisement
02
Which idea grabs you most in a film? Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?
Advertisement
03
How do you like your story told? Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.
Advertisement
04
What makes a truly great antagonist? The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?
Advertisement
05
What do you want from a film’s ending? The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?
Advertisement
06
Which setting pulls you in most? Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.
Advertisement
07
What cinematic craft impresses you most? Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.
Advertisement
08
What kind of main character do you root for? The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.
Advertisement
09
How do you feel about a film that takes its time? Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.
Advertisement
10
What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema? The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?
Advertisement
The Academy Has Decided Your Perfect Film Is…
Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.
Advertisement
Parasite
You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.
Advertisement
Everything Everywhere All at Once
You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.
Advertisement
Oppenheimer
You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.
Advertisement
Birdman
You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.
Advertisement
No Country for Old Men
You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.
Andy Cohen recently broke his silence on West Wilson‘s nudes being leaked just moments before the filming of the “Summer House” season 10 reunion began.
In part one of the reunion special, Wilson looked to his co-stars, Jesse Solomon, Amanda Batula, and Carl Radke, and revealed that his phone had been hacked, resulting in private images of him being circulated in his hometown.
During a recent episode of the “Smith Sisters Live” show, Cohen opened up about the moment Wlilson learned suggestive images of him were floating around.
Advertisement
In the reunion episode, Wilson is heard saying, “I just got a text that someone hacked my phone, and [there are] nudes of me being sent around. That’s a good text to get right before this.”
Solomon and Radke confirmed they had heard the news, with Solomon adding that he had been sent the photos.
When Wilson asked his co-stars whether he was “hard” in the pictures, Radke shot back, “Very soft.”
Advertisement
Cohen Breaks His Silence On West Wilson’s Private Photos Being Shared Online
Bravo | Jocelyn Prescod
Cohen recalled the unexpected moment on the radio today, saying, “When West sat down and started talking about the nudes, and they’re all like, ‘Is it hard? It is soft?’”
Cohen, who hadn’t seen part one of the reunion at the time, added, “I don’t know if they showed this, but Jesse [Solomon] then showed him the picture of what he had been sent. I mean, it’s like, [a] reunion first.”
The father of two and Bravo figurehead said that the moment “Summer House” viewers saw in the reunion about Wilson’s nude images wasn’t the only time the pictures were discussed.
“We had not started the reunion. Everyone was entering. It comes up again later in the group, and you’ll see how it plays out,” Cohen teased.
Cohen Said West Wilson Probably Had The ‘Worst Day’ Filming The ‘Summer House’ Season 10 Reunion
Bravo | Clifton Prescod
Elsewhere in the radio show, Cohen seemed to acknowledge the stress Wilson must’ve been feeling before filming began.
“I’m glad that they found that moment. It’s crazy. It would be a person’s worst day ever to have nudes leaked. To have them leaked on that day, and then he left and found out the news of his grandmother … I don’t think you could have a worse day,” he said.
Advertisement
According to a previous report from The Blast, Wilson’s grandmother, Gayle R. Wilson, was found dead in April 2026. Law enforcement officials said that the reality star’s cousin, Dakota Sweeney, allegedly killed her after getting into an argument over household chores.
Wilson Addressed His Leaked Images On An Episode Of His ‘Show Me Something’ Podcast
Bravo | Kareem Black
Weeks ago, Wilson reacted to the news that his nude images had been shared online, saying, “I know my f-cking nudes leaked, OK. But guess what? It’s like the sixth worry of mine right now. I have a lot of sh-t going on, and I’m gonna own it,” per The Blast.
While Wilson admitted that the photos were of him, he said he couldn’t remember the details about the images. “I don’t know how old it is, but it’s from my old apartment. I had a sauna by my bathroom, and I would always get out of the sauna and double-check. Or check progress,” he said.
As the conversation continued, Wilson got a bit more serious about the matter, urging his listeners to be kind to people.
“I know I’m laughing, because if I don’t laugh, I’ll fing cry about all of this,” he said, adding, “Don’t leak people’s nudes or hack people’s sh-t. It’s, like, not fun.”
Advertisement
Wilson Said He’s Afraid Of Going Out In Public After His Fallout With His ‘Summer House’ Co-Stars
Part one of the “Summer House” reunion was intense for Wilson, who recently confirmed that he was dating his co-star, Batula, who had split from her husband, Kyle Cooke, weeks before their public announcement.
Another reason Wilson faced backlash was due to the reality star’s past relationship with Batula’s former friend, Ciara Miller.
According to The Blast, Wilson said on his podcast, “Show Me Something,” that he was a bit nervous about how the public would react to him in the coming days.
Advertisement
“Going out in public is kind of scary,” Wilson said before going on to deny claims that he began hooking up with Batula to spite his ex.
“If I tried to fight everyone’s different opinion on sh-t I’ve done, I would be f-cking dead and on the floor. It’s just not worth reacting to sh-t like that. But [that’s] obviously not the case,” Wilson said.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login