Based on a Graham Greene short story and explicitly designed to lift the public’s spirits as World War II wound on and Brits feared Nazi infiltrators, the British World War II film Went the Day Well? could easily be a stuffy time capsule of a film in 2026. However, even today, it’s still a bracing war film that clearly lived past its sell-by date to inspire filmmakers from Sam Peckinpah and Edgar Wright to Quentin Tarantino.

Director Alberto Cavalcanti carefully paints bucolic daily life in a quiet English village before the peace is shattered by a Nazi vanguard — and the film turns into a bloody siege thriller, with everyday folks taking up arms to defend their homes. Boasting an incredible lineup of British screen greats and surprisingly brutal action, Went the Day Well? is well worth a look in 2026, whether as a sort of Inglourious Basterds prototype or one of the best WWII films of all time in its own right.

‘Went the Day Well?’ Is the Kind of Nazi-Killing Thriller the Public Needed During WWII

Image via Rialto Pictures/StudioCanal

Went the Day Well? makes its intentions clear almost from frame one, with a gravedigger laying out the stakes for the audience and promising that no matter the threat, there is Nazi killing to come. “They wanted England, these Jerries did,” says the film’s narrator as he points to a gravestone with a German name on it. “And this is the only bit they got.”

The sun shines, the milk is delivered, and prim English manners are on full display when a squadron of “British” soldiers arrive in the countryside town of Bramley End and are welcomed with open arms. Hints abound that all is not well. In a tense pub scene before the action begins, a kindly old barmaid offers a toast to the undercover Germans, jokingly referring to them as foreigners and cheering, “Down with Hitler!” as the men show their discomfort with some extremely subtle facial expressions. Cavalcanti manages a level of tension in sequences like these that will remind viewers of Tarantino’s legendary pub standoff some 70 years later.

The Nazi soldiers eventually take the village hostage, with efforts to warn the outside Allied forces frustrated. And things come to a boil when kindly postmistress Mrs. Collins convinces one of the Germans that she’s a sympathizer, then blinds him with the very cup of sugar she’s about to serve before sinking an axe into him in a spectacularly tense and cathartic scene. From this point forward, Went the Day Well?‘s lineage through Inglourious Basterds and even Hot Fuzz‘s country village siege climax becomes clear.

The innocent in Went the Day Well? suffer remarkably cruel fates for a film of its time — especially for one designed to lift the country’s spirits. A young boy is shot through the leg, the aforementioned barmaid is bayoneted, and another village woman literally throws herself on a grenade to save the children in her charge. It was an “orgy of shockingly blunt, matter-of-fact violence” for the time, according to British film critic Tom Huddleston.

Cavalcanti stages several thrilling set pieces as the villagers strike back, and the gorgeous black and white cinematography, particularly in a tense forest sequence, recalls some of the dark fairy-tale beauty of Night of the Hunter, which wouldn’t release for more than a decade. Throughout its brief running time, the mannered, extremely proper acting style of 1940s Britain clashes wonderfully with the brutal violence and jingoistic attitude toward the Nazi invaders.

And the climactic scene with the village women taking sniper shots at fleeing Germans from church windows offers a similar giddy thrill to Tarantino’s vengeance-fueled set pieces in Inglourious Basterds and Django Unchained, and Went the Day Well? ends as it began: With the Nazis underneath the ground and the plucky British townsfolk returning to business as usual.

Related

Quentin Tarantino’s WWII Revenge Fantasy Masterpiece Pulls Right From This ’40s Thriller

Would anybody like a glass of milk?

Advertisement

‘Went the Day Well?’ Is a Breezy Blast — And Easy to Watch Today

Image via Rialto Pictures/StudioCanal

Advertisement

The Guardian’s Phillip French later called Went the Day Well? the single “best, most ferocious picture of the war years,” and its pure lizard-brain focus on revenge and giving the Nazis what-for remains a dubious joy to this day.

As a piece of propaganda by Britain’s wartime Ministry of Information, it served its purpose well, both warning of Nazi “fifth columnists” and boosting viewers’ morale. But the criminally under-seen Went the Day Well? also left a lasting imprint on pop entertainment, and it can still be streamed on Prime Video and for free on the Internet Archive. At a slim 88 minutes, it’s an easy bet for war film enthusiasts — and it still packs a surprising punch.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

December 7, 1942

Runtime

88 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Alberto Cavalcanti

Advertisement

Writers

Angus MacPhail, Diana Morgan

Producers

Advertisement

Michael Balcon

Advertisement

• 
• 

  Leslie Banks

  Oliver Wilsford

  Advertisement
• 
• 

  Basil Sydney

  Major Hammond / Kommandant Orlter

Advertisement

Advertisement

For a while there, Silo felt basically untouchable on Apple TV. The show built a loyal audience, kept people theorizing between episodes, and turned its huge underground mystery into one of the platform’s most reliable conversation starters. That’s why its latest chart slide stands out. It’s not that the series has disappeared overnight, but compared to where it usually sits in Apple’s ecosystem, Silo is clearly having a quieter moment.

FlixPatrol’s latest figures show Silo sitting outside the top tier of Apple TV’s current worldwide attention cycle, with the title page showing it at No. 15 in recent Apple TV rankings and its current chart footprint looking much lighter than the show’s previous highs. In individual country charts, it’s still showing up, but it’s no longer dominating the way it did during its hotter runs.

That doesn’t mean the appetite has vanished. If anything, it probably says more about how crowded Apple TV is getting at the moment, with titles like Your Friends & Neighbors and Monarch: Legacy of Monsters currently pulling more immediate attention. Still, when you’re talking about a series led by Rebecca Ferguson and built around one of TV’s best dystopian hooks, even a temporary chart cool-down is worth clocking. Silo has already proven it can bounce back before, and this probably won’t be the last time it claws its way up again.

How Good Is ‘Silo’?

Image via Apple TV+

Collider’s Tania Hussain awarded the second season an 8/10, praising its “uniquely immersive environment” and “razor-sharp writing,” adding that “by grounding its Orwellian elements into tense yet relatable human struggles, Silo continues to surpass the genre… emerging as a masterful exploration of isolation and survival through Ferguson’s nuanced portrayal.” She wrote:

“With its 10 episodes this season, the Silo world is truly expanding and the supporting performances amplify so much of the stakes. Exemplifying a sad and almost heartwrenching portrayal of loneliness with a childlike wonder, Steve Zahn is at his absolute best in a barren playground where his character, Solo, creates the rules. It’s the chemistry he shares with Ferguson that creates a dynamic sort of interplay that contrasts her serious demeanor with a spirited and lively approach. He is every bit a compelling counterpart to Juliette, and one we see most terrifically evolve across the series.”

Silo Seasons 1 and 2 are streaming now on Apple TV, while Season 3 is awaiting release. Stay tuned to Collider for more streaming updates.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

May 5, 2023

Showrunner

Advertisement

Graham Yost

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Taylor Frankie Paul is making it clear she’s not stepping away from the spotlight even as controversy continues to follow her. 

The reality TV star and MomTok influencer is pushing back against calls to go offline, choosing instead to document her struggles in real time. 

With domestic violence investigations, a canceled TV opportunity, and ongoing scrutiny tied to her relationship with ex Dakota Mortensen, Paul is now leaning into the chaos rather than hiding from it.

Taylor Frankie Paul isn’t interested in logging off social media, despite growing pressure from critics who believe she should take a step back.

After a TikTok fan advised her to “Do your healing off of social media,” Paul responded directly, making her stance unmistakably clear. 

Taking to her Instagram Stories, she shared a screenshot of the fan’s comment alongside the reply, “That sounds like the reasonable answer, however I will be doing the opposite. I’ll continue sharing on social media showing how ugly healing truly can be.”

For Paul, posting content is more than just staying visible, it’s part of how she processes everything happening around her. 

She explained, “Making and editing videos is my way of processing just like people like to write into a journal.. this is my way and I choose to share it.”

She also acknowledged that her approach might not work for everyone, adding, “Saying this with love, most people would need to get off and so understandable [bandaged heart emoji] I’m not most.”

Paul Opens Up About ‘Ugly’ Healing Amid Legal Drama

Taylor Frankie Paul has been upfront about the emotional toll of the past few months, describing her situation as something deeply overwhelming.

A day before the response, the 31-year-old shared a post on Instagram, revealing she planned to document “the ugly parts of what healing actually looks like,” giving followers a closer look at what she’s going through behind the scenes. 

Paul also described the backlash and attention as a “public atrocity” she wouldn’t wish “upon my worst enemy.” Her legal situation has been a major part of that stress. 

The TV personality referenced a turning point when she learned charges would not be pursued against her, saying, “God undoubtedly had a hand in this because after waiting 7 weeks on the 7th day EXACTLY I received the call all charges dropped.”

The investigations stemmed from reported domestic disputes involving her ex, Mortensen, with whom she shares a young son. 

While the case brought significant scrutiny, prosecutors ultimately chose not to move forward.

Taylor Frankie Paul’s Reality TV Setback Adds To Ongoing Turmoil

Paul’s personal challenges have also spilled into her professional life, affecting major opportunities. 

She had been set to appear on season 22 of “The Bachelorette,” but the project was abruptly canceled just days before its scheduled premiere. The decision came after footage surfaced showing a past altercation involving Mortensen.

In response to the situation, a spokesperson stated per PEOPLE, “In light of the newly released video just surfaced today, we have made the decision to not move forward with the new season of The Bachelorette at this time, and our focus is on supporting the family.”

Despite the setback, Paul has expressed a desire to rebuild and focus on herself. In her Instagram post, she shared that she’s returning to basics, writing, “We’re working on eating, movement, rest, and retraining the nervous system.”

At the same time, she made it clear that her journey will remain public. “I’ll be sharing the process, because if my worst is shared better bet I’ll share the rebuilding too,” she said.

Paul Opens Up About The Bad Effects Of Her Domestic Violence Case

Taylor Frankie Paul recently opened up in raw detail about what she called the “ugly parts” of healing after her domestic violence case, sharing an emotional and deeply personal message with fans. 

As The Blast reported, she described the aftermath as overwhelming, writing, “I wouldn’t wish this upon my worst enemy,” while reflecting on the intense public scrutiny and personal pain she endured.   

Paul added that the experience felt like “a certain living hell I couldn’t find my way out of,” revealing how trapped and broken she felt during the ordeal.  

She also painted a vivid picture of her emotional state, saying it was like “someone witnessed me bleeding out and poured salt all over me.” 

Despite that, Paul expressed gratitude for surviving the situation, saying she felt “forever freed,” even if she was “barely” holding on.  

Dakota Mortensen Admits Regret Over Difficult Cycle With Taylor Frankie Paul

Days before Paul’s revelation, Mortensen broke his silence on the legal drama, describing their relationship as a “difficult cycle” he wished he had left sooner. 

According to The Blast, he admitted, “I regret not stepping away from a difficult cycle sooner,” reflecting on the toxic nature of their on-and-off relationship.   

Mortensen explained that he had since taken time away from the chaos, adding that his focus was now “on my son and creating a stable, healthy environment.”   

He also pushed back against public narratives, saying, “I don’t agree with how this situation has been portrayed publicly,” arguing it “does not reflect the full context” or its impact on him and their child.   

He acknowledged his own role in the situation, saying he was taking accountability and prioritizing growth, while stepping away from the spotlight to focus on healing.

After such a long wait, Euphoria coming back was always going to be a moment. The real question was whether the show would still have the same pull after four years away. Turns out that answer is very much yes. HBO’s drama returned on April 12, 2026, and within days it had climbed right to the top of HBO Max’s worldwide chart, overtaking The Pitt in the process. That’s a pretty loud comeback.

FlixPatrol’s chart for April 17 shows Euphoria at No. 1 on HBO Max worldwide, ahead of The Pitt, while the April 18 chart has the two shows flipped again with The Pitt at No. 1 and Euphoria at No. 2. Either way, the bigger point is clear: the series came back swinging and immediately re-entered the platform’s top tier.

That tracks with the scale of the return. Season 3 premiered four years after the previous run and pushes the story forward with a major time jump, bringing Zendaya, Sydney Sweeney, Hunter Schafer, Jacob Elordi, and more back into the chaos. Love it or hate it, Euphoria has never exactly done subtle, and that shock-factor reputation is part of why the comeback landed so hard.

Is ‘Euphoria’ Worth Watching?

Collider’s review stated that Euphoria Season 3 still delivers the things the show is known for, but it no longer feels like it has much purpose. Even with the five-year time jump and an older version of these characters, the series does not seem to have grown in any meaningful way. According to the review, it falls back on the same formula of striking visuals, strong performances, and nonstop ugliness, but this time without much depth behind it.

“The fact that these characters were in high school for the first two seasons made all of Euphoria‘s risqué moments that much more shocking and uncomfortable, but in a way, it also sort of felt like the whole point. The show’s five-year time jump inherently strips it of its central thesis of ‘look at all the adult things kids have to deal with nowadays,’ making it difficult to pinpoint why Season 3 exists at all. Is it beautifully shot? Yes. Does it feature excellent performances? Many. Does it have anything interesting to say? It doesn’t, really — in fact, it amounts to a whole lot of well-crafted, weakly-written nothing.”

Euphoria is streaming now.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

2019 – 2026-00-00

Network

Advertisement

HBO

Showrunner

Sam Levinson

Advertisement

Directors

Jennifer Morrison, Augustine Frizzell

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

There’s a reason some shows become background noise, and others become ritual. NCIS, now in its 23rd season, has managed to be both. It’s a comfort watch, a character drama, a crime procedural, and, somehow, still a ratings and streaming force in an era where even younger, louder franchises burn out fast. On Paramount+, where legacy library viewing drives real value, few titles have proved as durable.

That durability — and consistent ratings, according to FlixPatrol — is the result of a series built to evolve without losing its center. Cast members leave as others step in; people like Gibbs exit as Alden Parker arrives. NCIS has managed, over the years, to get the rhythms right and keep its audience.

‘NCIS’ Built a Formula That Still Works

Image via CBS

If by now, viewers don’t know about NCIS, a team of agents with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service investigates crimes tied to the Navy and Marine Corps, such as murders, espionage, terrorism, cybercrime, and internal corruption. Some cases are ripped from the pages of military bureaucracy; others edge toward political thriller territory. Despite similar shows doing the same, what keeps NCIS alive after more than two decades isn’t the cases alone.

Mark Harmon’s Gibbs gave the show its steel as Michael Weatherly’s DiNozzo brought swagger and comic timing. Pauley Perrette’s Abby made forensic science feel punk while David McCallum gave the series soul. Then there were later additions that didn’t imitate what came before, but added a different flair to the series. For instance, Gary Cole wisely didn’t play Parker as Gibbs 2.0. Wilmer Valderrama, Katrina Law, Sean Murray, Brian Dietzen, Diona Reasonover — the current team works because the show lets new rhythms form.

NCIS has always understood something many procedurals miss, which is that formula only works when it has texture. That’s why the show makes room for grief, running jokes, office rituals, old wounds, even absurd little signatures like Gibbs’ head slaps and those famous black-and-white “phoof” transitions. Tends to stick.

Where To Start With ‘NCIS’ if You’ve Never Watched

Image via Cliff Lipson / © CBS / courtesy everett collection

Twenty-three seasons can look intimidating, but one would beg to differ. Start at the beginning if you want the full Gibbs era; early NCIS has a crackling energy, and seasons two through nine are widely considered a golden run for good reason. Episodes like “Kill Ari,” “Shiva,” and “Twilight” still hit just right.

Alternatively, you can start with season 19 and the Parker era because it functions, in many ways, as a soft reset, and you’ll catch up easily. A secret third option is to do what many viewers do (i.e., drop into standout episodes and let the show pull you along).

There’s also a misconception that NCIS is only for procedural devotees or older broadcast loyalists, which also undersells what the show does well. At its best, this is an ensemble drama disguised as a case-of-the-week machine. The investigations pull you in, and the relationships keep you around. Frankly, there’s pleasure in watching a show so comfortable in its own skin.

The “Lone Wolf & Cub” template, where a complex older man seeks redemption by dedicating his life to protecting a child, has inspired perhaps the most resilient of sub-genres. The template has been used in films as diverse as Logan, the Oscar-nominated superhero blockbuster starring Hugh Jackman, to Children of Men, the dystopian sci-fi classic directed by Alfonso Cuarón. More recently, it was explored in the HBO video game adaptation The Last of Us, starring Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey. However, there’s another movie in this group that is currently enjoying massive streaming success.

The movie was released in 2025 to mostly positive reviews but negligible box-office success. It was directed by Bryan Fuller, best known for the television shows Pushing Daisies and Hannibal. He reunited with his Hannibal star, Mads Mikkelsen, on the film, a fantasy in which a young girl approaches a hit-man to kill the “monster” under her bed. The movie premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival in 2025, before debuting theatrically in December.

Here’s Your New Favorite Fantasy Movie

We’re talking about Dust Bunny, which features Sophie Sloan as Mikkelsen’s young co-star, along with Sigourney Weaver and David Dastmalchian. Dust Bunny holds a “Certified Fresh” 86% score on the aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, where the critics’ consensus reads, “Elevated by Mads Mikkelsen and Sophie Sloan’s magnetic chemistry, Dust Bunny is a dazzlingly imaginative and stylish feature debut from director Bryan Fuller.”

In his review, Collider’s Ross Bonaime compared the movie to the dark fantasies of Tim Burton and the surreal dramas of Jean-Pierre Jeunet. He described Dust Bunny as “a film that’s both an assassin story and a movie that feels tame enough for kids, which is a perfect fit for Fuller’s aesthetic.” The positive reception appears to be working in the film’s favor. According to FlixPatrol, Dust Bunny was the number one movie on HBO Max domestically this weekend, beating out The Mummy, From the World of John Wick: Ballerina, and The Devil Wears Prada.

Stay tuned to Collider for more updates.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

December 11, 2025

Runtime

106 minutes

Advertisement

Director

Bryan Fuller

Advertisement

Producers

Basil Iwanyk, Erica Lee, Jillian Share

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Blake Lively commended Justin Bieber’s Coachella performance, describing it as a powerful return to the stage despite facing criticism. The actress’s post comes weeks after she spoke about experiencing “digital violence” in connection to her legal battle with Justin Baldoni.

The ongoing case between Lively and Baldoni continues to draw public attention, with both parties presenting competing claims as the trial date approaches.

Blake Lively Discusses The Price Of Fame

Blake Lively is lauding Justin Bieber’s Coachella performance, the singer’s first major live appearance since canceling his tour in 2022. The actress reposted an analysis by user Django Degree, who called the “Baby” singer a “living embodiment of the ‘Truman Show’,” referring to the 1998 film in which Truman Burbank, played by Jim Carrey, lived his life not knowing he was the subject of a reality show.

Degree juxtaposed Bieber’s life with Burbank’s, explaining that the singer got more than he bargained for after his rise to superstardom. “What followed was basically us watching them grow up and watch a bunch of adults treat that child like they live in a petting zoo,” he said.

Lively agreed with Degree’s sentiment and expanded on the point. “So many people have been hurt and never come back to themselves. We watch it happen every time,” the actress wrote.

The Actress On Being Under Public Scrutiny

Lively continued to write that people are quick to judge and often only reflect on a situation after it has already happened, saying, “And the collective looks back when it’s too late with empathy that was missing at the time. Shocked everyone treated someone’s most painful days as entertainment.”

The actress wrote that it still happens today, adding, “It makes money. It gets clicks. Followers. Virality.” Because of this, the actress noted that an entertainer’s health may be affected even when people do not intentionally cause harm.

Lively then tagged Bieber, writing, “Seeing @lilbieber meet that with healing was stunning.” Fans looked forward to Bieber’s comeback, but many were left confused or disappointed after the first Coachella weekend. Per The Blast, the singer’s set was described as “lazy,” especially since Bieber was reportedly paid $10 million for the gig.

Blake Lively’s Fight Against ‘Digital Violence’

Lively’s comments about public scrutiny come two weeks after she posted about “digital violence.” After most of her claims against Justin Baldoni were dismissed, the actress urged her followers not to be distracted by “the digital soap opera.” “The constant packaging of this lawsuit as a ‘Celebrity Drama’ is not only irresponsible, but it is by design: to keep you from seeing yourselves in my story. The physical pain from digital violence is very real,” the actress wrote.

Some online creators pushed back against Lively, especially those who received subpoenas for their personal data after extensively reporting on the actress’s case against Baldoni. Per The Blast, one creator said that the actress’s statement about digital violence was “disingenuous,” and another opined that she was “gaslighting everybody.”

The Actress Is Seeking Millions In Reputational Damages

As reported by TMZ, Lively is seeking more than $40 million in reputational damages in her case against Baldoni. She is also reportedly asking for hundreds of millions in compensatory and punitive damages. In documents obtained by the outlet, the actress noted that there were about 176 million online impressions about her, with descriptions such as “bully,” “mean girl,” and “tone deaf.”

Lively is alleging that Baldoni’s team orchestrated a smear campaign against her, resulting in the loss of future earnings and income from her hair care and beverage companies. Baldoni’s team has vehemently denied the allegations, saying that the backlash against Lively was organic. “That Lively’s reputation may have suffered is a result of her own ill-advised public statements and actions… This is a dispute about Hollywood reputations, not genuine legal wrongs. It does not belong in court,” a document filed by the Baldoni camp in 2025 read.

What Remains Of Blake Lively’s Lawsuit?

In early April, the judge presiding over the case dismissed 10 out of Lively’s 13 claims, including allegations of sexual harassment and defamation. The surviving claims are breach of contract, retaliation, and aiding and abetting in retaliation.

As the trial date draws near, there are no signs of either side settling, with both parties continuing to stand firm in their positions and prepare for the court proceedings. The trial is scheduled to begin on May 18 in New York.