Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Entertainment

Pussycat Dolls Perform With Busta Rhymes at AMAs 2026

Published

on

Feature American Music Awards 2026 Red Carpet

The Pussycat Dolls took the 2026 American Music Awards stage alongside iconic rapper Busta Rhymes after canceling the U.S. leg of their comeback tour.

Nicole Scherzinger, Ashley Roberts and Kimberly Wyatt performed with Rhymes, 54, for a rendition of their 2005 hit “Don’t Cha” during the Monday, May 25, awards show at the MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas.

The Y2K girl group also performed their hit songs “Buttons,” “When I Grow Up” and “Club Song” in a medley during the the awards show.

Scherzinger, 47, Roberts, 44, and Wyatt, 44, returned to the stage nearly 20 years after the Pussycat Dolls’ AMAs September 2006 performance debut, when they sang their hit “Buttons.”

Advertisement
Feature American Music Awards 2026 Red Carpet


Related: American Music Awards 2026 Red Carpet: Stars Take Over Sin City in Style

Celebrities stepped onto the 2026 American Music Awards red carpet in show-stopping looks for one of the hottest events of the year. A-listers dazzled as they gave Us some serious fashion inspo under the bright Las Vegas lights on Monday, May 25, in honor of the star-studded ceremony held at the MGM Grand Garden Arena […]

Scherzinger, Roberts and Wyatt announced their reunion as a trio in March, revealing their plans to embark on the 53-date PCD Forever Tour in North America, Europe and the U.K. from June to October. The group also released a new track titled “Club Song.” Notably missing from the Pussycat Dolls revival lineup were past members Carmit Bachar, Jessica Sutta and Melody Thornton.

Advertisement

Earlier this month, the Pussycat Dolls canceled multiple dates of the PCD Forever Tour.

GettyImages-2278208901-pussycat-dolls-amas-2026
Ethan Miller/Getty Images

“When we announced the PCD Forever Tour, we hoped to bring the show to fans across the world,” the group wrote via Instagram on May 4. “After taking an honest look at the North American run, we’ve made the difficult and heartbreaking decision to cancel all but one of the North America dates.”

Us Weekly confirmed at the time that the Pussycat Dolls will still perform at the OUTLOUD Music Festival at WeHo Pride on June 6.

“The LGBTQ+ community has shown us so much love and support throughout our career, and we’re honored to be part of a weekend rooted in joy, pride, music and chosen family,” they continued. “Our U.K. and European dates are still moving forward as planned, and the response has been incredible, with several shows already sold out.”

After the news broke, Us exclusively revealed Scherzinger’s reaction to the canceled concerts.

Advertisement

“Nicole is disappointed,” a source exclusively told Us earlier this month. “She was really excited to get back out there with Ashley and Kimberly to celebrate a new era, but now she feels they didn’t get a chance to showcase what they can do.”

According to the insider, the group was “too ambitious” while planning their first venture since 2009’s Doll Domination Tour.

What We Know About Pussycat Dolls' Canceled Tour


Related: What We Know About Pussycat Dolls‘ Canceled Tour

Advertisement

The highly anticipated Pussycat Dolls reunion has now left fans reeling with all but one date on the U.S. leg of their PCD Forever Tour being canceled. Nicole Scherzinger, Ashley Roberts and Kimberly Wyatt announced in March that a 53-date tour of North America, Europe and the U.K would kick off in June. The shows […]

“They went from not touring for over 15 years to booking big arenas like Madison Square Garden with only one new song to back it,” the source noted. “They overestimated the demand.”

For Scherzinger, the cancellation of select dates on the PCD Forever Tour is not the first time she’s been let down during her career.

“Nicole is trying to look on the bright side because the Dolls are still proceeding with their European dates, which she’s beyond excited about, but it’s hard not to feel defeated,” the insider told Us. “She’s been through this before. Her solo album Her Name Is Nicole was shelved [in 2007], the Dolls also had to cancel their last reunion tour [in 2020] and she has a ton of other music that she never got to put out. It’s been a tough road for Nicole despite her other successes but she’s grateful for the continuous love from across the pond.”

The source added, “Nicole is hopeful the Dolls can figure out something else in the U.S. after people see the show they’re putting together for Europe, which is going to be very special.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Entertainment

10 Greatest Movie Masterpieces That Are Better Than the Book

Published

on

Heath Ledger embracing Jake Gyllenhaal from behind in 'Brokeback Mountain'.

Oftentimes, loyal readers whine and complain that the adaptations of their favorite novels are never as good as the source material. The truth of the matter is, it’s hard to take such vast material and adapt it into a perfectly crafted single-seated viewing experience. Unless you’re a mammoth franchise, getting a chance to split a book into two parts is rare. That said, every so often, a movie ends up being better than the book it’s based on, leading it to masterpiece status.

Whether faithful adaptations or complete transformations of the product, these ten masterpieces are far superior to their page counterparts. From stories about the ruthless Italian mafia or the mean clique in high school, to tales about taboo love or unlikely friendships, these films are so good, they sometimes live on their own without us remembering where they started from. Though we’re not taking anything away from their source material, we tend to pick the screen over the page.

Advertisement

‘Brokeback Mountain’ (2005)

Heath Ledger embracing Jake Gyllenhaal from behind in 'Brokeback Mountain'.
Heath Ledger embracing Jake Gyllenhaal from behind in ‘Brokeback Mountain’.
Image via Focus Features

It’s been over two decades, and we still can’t quit Brokeback Mountain. Based on the 1997 short story by Annie Proulx, the Ang Lee-directed romantic drama follows two ranch hands— Ennis Del Mar (Heath Ledger) and Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal)— who fall deeply in love. Set in the American West from 1963 to 1983, Brokeback Mountain explores the agonizing challenges of a secret, decades-long romance amid intense societal homophobia.

Brokeback Mountain is a beautifully agonizing tale that highlights the heavy emotional toll of living a taboo life in a society that champions traditional, rugged masculinity and heteronormative expectations. It transcends the gay cowboy trope by delivering a universal, heartbreaking exploration of regret, repressed desire, and the destructive effects of expectations. What was once just a 14-page story was transformed into a sweeping, breathtaking epic. Proulx’s story is crafted from an emotional distance, but writers Diana Ossana and Larry McMurtry flesh out the characters, providing an intimate glimpse into Ennis and Jack’s story. From there, Ledger and Gyllenhaal breathed life into their counterparts, presenting one of the greatest love stories cinema has seen.

Advertisement

‘Fight Club’ (1999)

Brad Pitt in Fight Club Image via 20th Century Studios

The first rule of Fight Club is don’t talk about Fight Club, unless you’re praising it, and that we are. Director David Fincher had an extraordinarily difficult job adapting Chuck Palahniuk’s novel, and yet, he had a world of potential in realizing it; what resulted was a masterpiece. The story follows a depressed, severely insomniac office worker (Edward Norton) who attempts to cure his existential emptiness by starting a secret, underground fighting ring with a charismatic soap salesman named Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt).

A story that tackles the feeling of being trapped in mundane, soulless jobs and the desire for true human connection through the lens of masculinity, Fight Club is a fearless dissection of material consumerism with gripping psychological twists. Fincher and screenwriter Jim Uhls take Palahniuk’s novel and tighten it up. Perhaps the biggest and most important change comes in the conclusion. In the novel, the narrator shoots himself and ends up in a mental institution. The film provides a more definitive and powerful ending as the narrator successfully severs Tyler’s hold on him but is still unable to stop his plan. Further, the film is more straightforward and less stream-of-consciousness, which worked wonders for the novel but would’ve made the movie far more erratic.

Advertisement

‘Forrest Gump’ (1994)

Tom Hanks in 'Forrest Gump'.
Tom Hanks in ‘Forrest Gump’.
Image via Paramount Pictures

Directed by Robert Zemeckis and based on the 1986 novel by Winston Groom, Forrest Gump follows the life of a kindhearted, intellectually disabled man from Alabama named Forrest (Tom Hanks). Through a series of flashbacks, Forrest narrates his extraordinary life story while sitting on a park bench in Savannah, Georgia, documenting his time in Vietnam, his lifelong, unwavering love for Jenny Curran (Robin Wright), his childhood sweetheart, and his sudden business success.

A tender tale, Forrest Gump is a triumphant underdog story that reaches new heights on screen. The main contrast between the page and the screen is the titular character himself. Seen as a foul-mouthed, cynical savant, Hanks plays him as a lovable innocent man driven by an unwavering heart. While the book does showcase some outlandish plot points, including becoming a professional wrestler, a chess champion, and going to space with a NASA chimp named Sue, screenwriter Eric Roth kept Forrest’s journey as realistic and believable as possible. Thanks to Forrest, we learned that life is like a box of chocolates.













Advertisement



















































Collider Exclusive · Oscar Best Picture Quiz
Which Oscar Best Picture
Is Your Perfect Movie?

Parasite · Everything Everywhere · Oppenheimer · Birdman · No Country
Advertisement

Five Oscar Best Picture winners. Five completely different visions of what cinema can be — and what it can do to you. One of them is the film that was made for the way your mind works. Ten questions will figure out which one.

🪜Parasite

🌀Everything Everywhere

☢️Oppenheimer

🐦Birdman

Advertisement

🪙No Country for Old Men

Advertisement

01

What kind of film experience do you actually want?
The best movies don’t just entertain — they leave something behind.





Advertisement

02

Which idea grabs you most in a film?
Great films are driven by a central obsession. What’s yours?





Advertisement

03

How do you like your story told?
Form is content. The way a story is shaped changes what it means.





Advertisement

04

What makes a truly great antagonist?
The opposition defines the protagonist. What kind of opposition fascinates you?





Advertisement

05

What do you want from a film’s ending?
The final note is the one that lingers. What do you want it to sound like?





Advertisement

06

Which setting pulls you in most?
Where a film takes place shapes everything — mood, stakes, what’s even possible.





Advertisement

07

What cinematic craft impresses you most?
Every great film has a signature — a technical or artistic element that makes it unmistakable.





Advertisement

08

What kind of main character do you root for?
The protagonist is the lens. Who you choose to follow says something about you.





Advertisement

09

How do you feel about a film that takes its time?
Pace is a choice. Some films sprint; others let tension accumulate slowly, deliberately.





Advertisement

10

What do you want to feel walking out of the cinema?
The best films leave a mark. What kind of mark do you want?





Advertisement
The Academy Has Decided
Your Perfect Film Is…

Your answers have pointed to one Oscar Best Picture winner above all others. This is the film that was made for the way your mind works.

Advertisement

Parasite

You are drawn to films that operate on multiple levels simultaneously — that begin in one genre and quietly, brilliantly migrate into another. Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite is a film about class, desire, and the architecture of inequality that manages to be darkly funny, deeply suspenseful, and genuinely shocking across a single extraordinary running time. Your instinct is for cinema that hides its true intentions until the moment it’s ready to reveal them. Parasite is exactly that — a film that rewards close attention and punishes assumptions, right up to its devastating final image.

Advertisement

Everything Everywhere All at Once

You want it all — and this film gives you all of it. The Daniels’ Everything Everywhere All at Once is one of the most maximalist films ever made: action comedy, multiverse sci-fi, family drama, existential crisis, and a genuinely earned emotional core that sneaks up on you amid the chaos. You are someone who responds to ambition, who doesn’t want cinema to choose between being entertaining and being meaningful. This film refuses that choice entirely. It is overwhelming by design, and its overwhelming nature is precisely the point — because the feeling of being crushed by infinite possibility is exactly what it’s about.

Advertisement

Oppenheimer

You are drawn to cinema on a grand scale — films that understand history not as a backdrop but as a force, and that place their characters inside that force and watch what happens. Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer is a film about the terrifying gap between what we can do and what we should do, told with the full weight of one of the most consequential moments in human history behind it. You want your films to feel important without feeling self-important — to earn their ambition through sheer craft and the gravity of their subject. Oppenheimer does exactly that. It is enormous, complicated, and refuses easy comfort.

Advertisement

Birdman

You are drawn to films that foreground their own construction — that make the how of the filmmaking part of the what it’s about. Alejandro González Iñárritu’s Birdman, shot to appear as a single continuous take, is cinema examining itself through the cracked mirror of a fading actor’s ego. You respond to formal daring, to the feeling that a film is doing something that probably shouldn’t be possible. Michael Keaton’s performance and Emmanuel Lubezki’s restless camera create something genuinely unlike anything else — a film that is simultaneously about creativity, relevance, self-destruction, and the impossibility of ever truly knowing if your work means anything at all.

Advertisement

No Country for Old Men

You are drawn to cinema that trusts silence, that refuses to explain itself, and that treats dread as a form of meaning. The Coen Brothers’ No Country for Old Men is a film about the arrival of a new kind of evil — implacable, arbitrary, and utterly indifferent to the moral frameworks we use to make sense of the world. It is one of the most formally controlled films ever made, and its controlled restraint is what makes it so terrifying. You want your films to haunt you, not comfort you. You are not interested in resolution if resolution would be dishonest. No Country for Old Men is honest in a way that most cinema never dares to be.

Advertisement

‘Jaws’ (1975)

Brody turning around, screaming and waving in Jaws.
Brody turning around, screaming and waving in Jaws.
Image via Universal Pictures
Advertisement

Believe it or not, audiences back in the day were petrified of a mechanical shark named Bruce because Steven Spielberg made Jaws an authentic horror thriller at sea. Based on Peter Benchley‘s novel, the iconic film tells the tale of the terrifying hunt for a massive, man-eating great white shark that terrorizes the beaches of a New England resort town, pitting local police chief Martin Brody (Roy Scheider), marine biologist Matt Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss), and a gruff shark hunter Quint (Robert Shaw) against the beast.

Brilliantly transcending the typical monster movie, Jaws taps into primal fears while offering a deeply human story. Benchley’s original novel was overstuffed with an array of subplots and unlikable characters. Conversely, Spielberg streamlined the narrative to provide a suspenseful thriller through a less-is-more approach that lifted its source material to great heights. In the book, Chief Brody is brash and easily ignitable, and Hooper is an arrogant, wealthy snob who has an affair with Ellen, Brody’s wife. On the screen, Benchley and co-writer Carl Gottlieb chose suspense over realism, which may not be everyone’s cup of tea, but the story moves into thriller territory by keeping the men at sea rather than letting them sleep each night ashore.

‘Mean Girls’ (2004)

The Plastics pose at the end of their talent show Christmas Dance in Mean Girls (2004).
The Plastics pose at the end of their talent show Christmas Dance in Mean Girls (2004).
Image via Paramount Pictures
Advertisement

On the surface, you may not even realize that Mean Girls is an adaptation because Tina Fey did an extraordinary job with Rosalind Wiseman‘s 2002 self-help book Queen Bees and Wannabes. The sharply written comedy follows Cady Heron (Lindsay Lohan), a naïve, formerly homeschooled teenager who moves to the U.S. after living in Africa. She gets a crash course in high school social hierarchies when she befriends two outcasts and infiltrates “The Plastics,” an elite yet toxic clique of mean girls that includes queen bee Regina George (Rachel McAdams), Karen Smith (Amanda Seyfried), and Gretchen Wieners (Lacey Chabert).

Transcending the typical teen movie, Mean Girls’ everlasting quotes have made it a masterclass in screenwriting. Fey focuses on the psychological warfare between teenage girls, creating a rich, relatable universe. Of course, a major cog in the film’s success was its quotability. The infamous lines came naturally and packed a comedic punch; there’s a reason why we still use them today. Mean Girls has a biting edge that’s given it timeless durability. It formed its own identity while honoring its source material, cementing itself as a new, flawless masterpiece.

‘Psycho’ (1960)

Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) slides down the shower tile after being stabbed in Psycho.
Marion Crane (Janet Leigh) slides down the shower tile after being stabbed in Psycho.
Image via Paramount Pictures
Advertisement

Very few movies are complete game changers quite like Psycho. The Alfred Hitchcock classic thriller is most notorious for killing off its main star, Janet Leigh, in the first act; from there, it was simply icing on the cake. Based on Robert Bloch’s original novel, Psycho tells the story of Marion Crane (Leigh), who seeks refuge at the isolated Bates Motel, where she meets the polite yet deeply disturbed proprietor, Norman Bates (Anthony Perkins), and his controlling, unseen mother. Upon Marion’s sudden disappearance, a desperate search by her lover, Sam Loomis (John Gavin), her sister, Lila (Vera Miles), and a private investigator, Milton Arbogast (Martin Balsam), uncovers a horrifying secret about Norman and his mother.

Hitchcock had extraordinary material to work with, but what he did with Bloch’s novel was unfounded, using the template to find a stronger, more enticing story narrative. The book begins with Norman; the film waits twenty minutes before introducing the sinister soul. By keeping Marion as the first focus, her murder comes as a great shock, with added emotional attachment. This approach helped define the newfound trope that literally no one is safe. Another major change came in Norman himself. In the book, he’s an overweight, middle-aged, balding, and overtly unstable man; Perkins couldn’t be further from that, making him unsuspecting. Here, Hitchcock turned the boy next door into the villain, an inspired choice that paid off.

‘The Devil Wears Prada’ (2006)

Andie, Miranda, and Emily standing together at a party in The Devil Wears Prada
Anne Hathaway, Meryl Streep, and Emily Blunt standing together at a party in The Devil Wears Prada
Image via 20th Century Studios
Advertisement

By far, one of the most beloved films of the early 21st century is The Devil Wears Prada, directed by David Frankel and based on the 2003 novel by Lauren Weisberger. It follows Andy Sachs (Anne Hathaway), an aspiring, idealistic journalist who lands a dream job as a personal assistant to Miranda Priestly (Meryl Streep), a tyrannical, world-famous fashion magazine editor. As she survives the cutthroat industry, Andy struggles to balance her soaring career with her personal life and morals.

A timeless classic that’s earned itself cult classic status, The Devil Wears Prada got us all questioning whether Weisberger’s experience with the real-life Miranda, Anna Wintour, was exactly like in the movies.Thanks to Aline Brosh McKenna’s screenplay, the original story was heightened and altered for cinematic purposes. The original characters in the novel were a tad one-dimensional: Andy was self-righteous, and Miranda was simply cruel, but the film softened them both a bit, giving them layers to play with. It’s incredibly quotable and timelessly fashionable, and the sequel is actually a worthy follow-up.

‘The Godfather’ (1972)

Ever since Marlon Brando uttered the line, “I’m going to make him an offer he can’t refuse,” cinema has never been the same. The Godfather remains one of the most influential films of all time, all thanks to Francis Ford Coppola’s extraordinary vision. Alongside novelist Mario Puzo, they streamlined Puzo’s novel’s bloated, pulp-heavy narrative into a tight cinematic epic. The mob drama chronicles the Corleone crime family in the 1940s and 1950s in New York, centering on the tragic transformation of Michael (Al Pacino), a decorated war hero and reluctant outsider, who is reluctantly pulled into the mafia’s violent underworld after an attempt on his father’s life.

Advertisement

With an all-star ensemble bringing some of the best performances of all time, The Godfather serves as a dark, tragic reflection of the American Dream. The scope Coppola and Puzo had to draw from was vast, so they cut the fat to hone in on the family drama first and foremost, maintaining the focus on Michael’s corruption. Through the incredible visual storytelling and soundscape, Coppola establishes an essential aura rooted in rich culture. Audiences are granted a chance to witness the authenticity of the Italian-American experience, which simply cannot be replicated on the page.

‘There Will Be Blood’ (2007)

Daniel Day-Lewis looking stern as Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood
Daniel Day-Lewis looking stern as Daniel Plainview in There Will Be Blood
Image via Paramount Vantage

The combination of Paul Thomas Anderson adapting Upton Sinclair is a surefire winning formula. It’s why There Will Be Blood remains one of the greatest films of the century. Based on Sinclair’s classic novel Oil!, the epic period drama chronicles the ruthless rise of Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis), a silver miner-turned-oil tycoon, during the California oil boom at the turn of the 20th century. The story tackles Plainview’s single-minded drive to acquire wealth and power, a pursuit that slowly destroys his humanity and isolates him from everyone.

Advertisement

There Will Be Blood explores the dark intersection of greed, capitalism, and religious fanaticism, turning the American Dream into a nightmare, thanks to Day-Lewis’ utter masterclass in acting. Oil! is dense, but Anderson distills a sprawling, politically focused narrative and twists it into a visceral character study, abandoning the novel’s superfluous subplots about labor unions and socialism, and nixes secondary characters for a tight story. By focusing on Plainview, the narrative tightens the novel’s important themes. Most importantly, Anderson uses Sinclair’s vivid text to create an immersive experience where you can literally see and hear the oil fields.

‘The Shawshank Redemption’ (1994)

Tim Robbins and Morgan Freeman playing checkers in The Shawshank Redemption Image via Columbia Pictures

There have been debates about the execution of nearly every Stephen King adaptation ever made, but there’s one film adaptation that tends to be met with universal acclaim as better than the source material: The Shawshank Redemption. Based on the novella Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption, the Frank Darabont-written and directed drama centers on Andy Dufresne (Tim Robbins), a banker wrongfully convicted of murdering his wife and her lover. Sentenced to Shawshank State Penitentiary, he befriends contraband smuggler Red (Morgan Freeman).

Advertisement

A mesmerizing dissertation on hope, friendship, and perseverance, The Shawshank Redemption celebrates the universal message about how the human spirit can endure even in the most confining situations. King’s story is sensational on the page, but Darabont elevates it by giving it emotional context through the masterful performances by Robbins and Freeman. The book also features a cavalcade of wardens and guards that Andy must deal with; by removing those subplots, more time is devoted to a single corrupt antagonist, Warden Samuel Norton (Bob Gunton), thus enhancing Andy’s ultimate triumph and allowing for a more poignant ending.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Drew Sidora & Ralph Pittman Divorce, Child Support Surfaces

Published

on

Rihanna Seemingly Addresses Baby Rumors, Talks "Little Pouch"

Whew, roommates! After years of back-and-forth accusations, emotional interviews, courtroom battles, and plenty of headlines, it looks like a major chapter has officially come to a close for Drew Sidora and Ralph Pittman. The former couple’s split has played out both on-screen and in the public eye, with fans closely following every twist and turn since their marriage unraveled. New legal documents reveal that a judge has reportedly issued a final decision that could put an end to one of the most talked-about divorces in recent ‘Real Housewives of Atlanta’ history.

RELATED: Drew Sidora Reveals The Ex-Boyfriend She’d Pick Up The Phone For & Michael B. Jordan’s Name Is In The Mix (VIDEO) 

Chile, The Judge Finally Made It Official

According to court documents obtained by TMZ, Drew Sidora and Ralph Pittman’s divorce was officially finalized on June 8 after more than three years of legal proceedings. As part of the final judgment, Drew was ordered to pay Ralph $2,218 per month in child support for their two children after the court determined that her monthly income exceeded his. The ruling also addressed the division of the couple’s assets, including their Atlanta home, which was awarded to Ralph. However, he must pay Drew approximately $145,000 for her share of the property’s equity. The judgment further outlines how the former couple’s vehicles and personal property will be divided, confirms that neither party will receive spousal support, and restores Drew’s legal last name to Jordan.

Roomies Debate Who Really Came Out Ahead

Meanwhile, roommates wasted no time flooding The Shade Room’s comment section with reactions to the ruling. Some men celebrated the outcome, claiming the decision proved that city boys are up. However, others questioned how Ralph could be considered ahead when, as they put it, he’s still “living in the basement.” A few commenters, however, argued that Drew may have come out on top in the long run.

One Instagram user @lilduval claimed, “City boys we up baby!

Advertisement

This Instagram user @themormonwivesreport shared, “Idk but to me Drew kind of won…!

And, Instagram user @pinky_the_ceo added, “2k is nothing 🤣 you’re now single but he’s now a single father 😂”

Meanwhile, Instagram user @shannyn.kregg shared, “I want to know the truth on why he has full custody.

While Instagram user @_dannibaby_ said, “He’s has primary custody that’s why. But it’s crazy cause he makes more 🤦🏽‍♀️.”

Advertisement

Then, Instagram user @prettyk1206 commented, “I would do prison before I pay a 🥷 a dime. Lock me tf up! 😒”

And, Instagram user @onemilindasmith wrote, “Ralph is 🗣️such a BUM! — a gaslighting BUM!!

Lastly, Instagram user @d.braids_studio said, “wtf and he still in the basement smh

Drew Sidora Moves Forward, But Is Michael B. Jordan In The Picture?

The divorce ruling comes as Drew appears focused on turning the page and embracing a new chapter. Earlier this year, after reports surfaced that she had been ordered to vacate the Georgia home she once shared with Ralph, the ‘RHOA’ star addressed the situation by emphasizing her commitment to co-parenting and doing what’s best for their children. She also made it clear that her focus remains on moving forward with grace and showing up as the best mother possible.

Advertisement

As previously reported, Drew has sparked conversation about her romantic future. Furthermore, Drew recently revealed on the ‘Reality Nightcap’ podcast that there is one ex she wouldn’t mind hearing from again. While she stopped short of naming names, she hinted that fans could connect the dots by revisiting an old photo from the NAACP Awards and joked, “Do some Googling.” Many listeners quickly speculated she was referring to actor Michael B. Jordan.

RELATED: Drew Sidora Speaks Out Amid Reports Of Being Ordered To Vacate Shared Home With Ralph Pittman (UPDATE)

What Do You Think Roomies?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Kenan Thompson explains how sharing an office with Colin Jost for 8 years led to a classic “SNL” sketch

Published

on


“Showed it to him and then watched his mind work,” Thompson said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Nelly Korda Reacts to Hilary Duff’s Support After Major Win

Published

on

Everything to Know About RHOSLC Alum Jen Shah's Legal Drama

After her dramatic 2026 U.S. Women’s Open victory on Sunday, June 7, Nelly Korda received the kind of support that dreams are made of. 

Hilary Duff commented on Korda’s Instagram post celebrating the golfer’s win with three champagne bottle emojis. 

“Growing up, I adored her,” Korda, 27 exclusively told Us Weekly on Tuesday, June 9, of her reaction to learning Duff, 38, is a fan. “I still adore her. But growing up, obviously we had no social media, no computers, my mom would bring home those teen magazines. I would cut out her photos and have a scrapbook. Sounds really creepy, but I love her. I had a scrapbook full of Hilary Duff.”

Not only that, Korda said, “She followed me, too.”

Advertisement

Korda clinched the 2026 U.S. Women’s Open with a putt on the 18th green at Riviera Country Club in Pacific Palisades, California, her first U.S. Women’s Open and second-consecutive major overall after winning the Chevron Championship in April. 

The Bradenton, Florida native has become the face of the LPGA Tour, meaning Duff isn’t the only celebrity to take notice of her dominance. 

LeBron James, an avid golfer himself, commented on Korda’s championship post, “Congrats!!!! 🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾.”

“It’s quite amazing to see how much he is not just supporting me, but all of the LPGA,” Korda said of James, 41. “He’s broadcasting a bunch of it on his own channels and that makes a really big difference. When athletes like him come together and support other athletes, it really does raise the bar and it brings in new fans. It’s extremely cool to see what a nut he is now about the game of golf.”

Advertisement

She added, “LeBron actually posting about us and really engaging with the Tour has brought in much more interest. It’s a great talking point.”

As for her own celebration after the big Sunday win, Korda admitted she was “actually in bed by 10 p.m.”

Advertisement

“My friends would actually be super disappointed in me,” she said with a laugh. “They were really excited to see that I chugged out of a champagne bottle because I actually don’t drink at all. I did media for like two hours after. By the last interview, I couldn’t even put sentences together. I was so tired.”

Korda added, “After I was done, my whole family and friends were waiting for me and the staff at Riviera brought out some sushi for us. So that was a great way to celebrate with them.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Star Wars’ Explosive Heist Thriller Is So Good, You Can Rewatch It Multiple Times

Published

on

Emily Blunt in front of a weather screen in Disclosure Day

After the recent mixed reception to The Mandalorian and Grogu, it’s clear that Star Wars isn’t the undisputed hit franchise it used to be. While Star Wars continues to thrive in the area of made-for-streaming animation, live-action endeavors have been largely hit or miss, with even the best outings failing to live up to their own hype. However, apart from Rogue One and its television prequel Andor, arguably the most rewatchable Star Wars project of the Disney era is the highly underrated Solo: A Star Wars Story.

‘Solo’ Recaptured the Fun of an Old Fashioned Space Western

From the very beginning, it seemed that Solo had a rough go of it. Between all the behind-the-scenes drama and the controversy surrounding Alden Ehrenreich‘s replacement of Harrison Ford, many were determined to write off this prequel before it ever had the chance to “punch it” to hyperspace. But despite all of these challenges, Solo — which was ultimately completed by Ron Howard from a screenplay by veteran franchise scribe Lawrence Kasdan and his son Jonathan Kasdan — offered an action-packed glimpse into the life of Han Solo long before we met him on Tatooine. Of course, what Solo does best (and what convinced this author to see it three times in theaters) is to recapture the excitement of a traditional space Western, echoing the genre that helped inspire George Lucas‘ original vision for the Star Wars franchise.

Advertisement



















Advertisement
Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Personality Quiz
Which Sci-Fi Hero Are You Most Like?
Paul Atreides · Captain Kirk · Princess Leia · Ellen Ripley · Max Rockatansky

Five iconic heroes. Five completely different ways of facing an impossible universe. One of them shares your instincts, your values, and your particular way of refusing to back down. Eight questions will tell you which one.

🏜️Paul Atreides

🖖Capt. Kirk

Princess Leia

Advertisement

🔦Ellen Ripley

🔥Max Rockatansky

Advertisement

01

How do you lead when the stakes couldn’t be higher?
The way you lead under pressure is the most honest thing about you.





Advertisement

02

What is your greatest strength in a crisis?
The quality that keeps you alive when everything else fails.





Advertisement

03

What is the thing you’d sacrifice everything else for?
Your deepest motivation is your truest compass.





Advertisement

04

How do you relate to the people around you?
Who you are to others under pressure is who you really are.





Advertisement

05

You’re facing a threat that no one else believes is real. What do you do?
How you respond when you’re the only one who sees it defines everything.





Advertisement

06

What has your heroism cost you personally?
Every hero pays. The question is what — and whether they’d pay it again.





Advertisement

07

How do you feel about the rules of the world you’re in?
Every hero has a relationship with the system. What’s yours?





Advertisement

08

When everything is on the line, what keeps you going?
The answer is the most honest thing about you.





Advertisement

Your Hero Has Been Identified
Your Sci-Fi Hero Is…

Your answers point to the iconic sci-fi hero who shares your instincts, your values, and your particular way of facing the impossible.

Advertisement


Arrakis · Dune

Paul Atreides

You carry a weight most people would crumble under — the knowledge of what you’re capable of, and the burden of what you might have to become.

Advertisement
  • You see further ahead than others and you plan accordingly, even when the vision frightens you.
  • You are driven by loyalty to your people and a sense of destiny you didn’t ask for but can’t escape.
  • Paul Atreides is not simply a hero — he is someone who understands the cost of power and chooses to bear it anyway.
  • That gravity, that willingness to carry what others won’t, is exactly you.


USS Enterprise · Star Trek

Captain Kirk

You lead with instinct, warmth, and an absolute refusal to accept a no-win scenario — because you’ve always believed there’s a third option nobody else has thought of yet.

Advertisement
  • You take the mission seriously without ever taking yourself too seriously.
  • Your crew would follow you anywhere, not because you demand it, but because you’ve earned it.
  • Kirk’s genius isn’t tactical — it’s human. He reads people, bends rules with purpose, and wills outcomes into existence through sheer conviction.
  • That combination of warmth, audacity, and relentless optimism is unmistakably yours.


The Rebellion · Star Wars

Princess Leia

You are the kind of person who holds the line when everyone else is losing faith — not because you’re fearless, but because giving up simply isn’t something you’re capable of.

Advertisement
  • You lead through conviction. Your voice carries because your belief is unshakeable.
  • You gave up everything ordinary the moment you chose the cause, and you’ve never looked back.
  • Leia is not a supporting character in her own story — she is the moral centre of the entire rebellion.
  • That same fierce, principled, unbreakable core is what defines you.


The Nostromo · Alien

Ellen Ripley

You are not reckless, not grandiose, and not particularly interested in being anyone’s hero — you just refuse to stop when it matters.

Advertisement
  • You see threats clearly, you document the truth even when no one listens, and when the time comes you handle it yourself.
  • Ripley’s heroism is earned, not performed. She doesn’t have a speech — she has a flamethrower and a plan.
  • You share her composure under the worst possible pressure, and her refusal to pretend the monster isn’t there.
  • When it counts, you don’t flinch. That’s everything.


The Wasteland · Mad Max

Max Rockatansky

You have been through fire that would break most people — and what came out the other side is something the world underestimates at its peril.

Advertisement
  • You don’t ask for help, don’t need validation, and don’t wait for anyone to tell you the rules no longer apply.
  • Your loyalty, when it finally arrives, is absolute — but it’s earned in silence and tested in action, not in words.
  • Max is not a nihilist. He is someone who lost everything and found, against his will, that he still has something worth protecting.
  • That bruised, stubborn, ultimately human core is exactly yours.

To say that Solo is anything less than a Western would be a blatant misreading of the film. This is a movie that follows a plucky on-the-run outlaw who gambles for his next ride, battles a small posse of warriors (who he later becomes sympathetic for), and opposes the encroaching armed forces in the midst of their campaign of “galactic westward expansion.” These genre elements don’t just undergird the entire picture, but they keep the whole plot moving as Han does all he can to earn enough to fly off with Qi’ra (Emilia Clarke) into the sunset. It’s from this vantage point that Solo is most enjoyed. Not as just another Star Wars prequel or a simple sci-fi adventure, but as a pulp Western set among the stars that aims high despite its occasional flounders.

Advertisement

Of course, where the “space Western” branding becomes especially clear is in sequences such as its pulse-pounding train heist. At the end of the first act, Han and Chewbacca (Joonas Suotamo) join Tobias Beckett (Woody Harrelson) and his crew to steal the shipment of coaxium right out from under the Empire’s nose. What should be a simple job becomes increasingly complicated when Enfys Nest (Erin Kellyman) arrives in search of the same cargo. The whole thing is explosive and anxiety-inducing and appropriately sets the stage for the rest of the picture — perhaps not unlike the series of train robberies at the beginning of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. More than anything, it comes across as being so downright space-and-horse operatic that we’re on the edge of our seat for whatever comes next.

‘Solo’ Deserves More Credit for Recapturing That Star Wars Magic

For as much as Solo works as a space Western, it is also unequivocally a heist movie — one that deserves a second look almost a decade later. Yet, it’s Ehrenreich’s performance as a young Solo that ties it all together. No doubt, Ehrenreich echoes the previous efforts of Ford, but he does so while offering his own unique spin better suited to a younger version of the character. It’s almost a shame we never got a sequel, because his casting alone solidifies the notion that recasting is always better than uneven CGI facial reconfigurations. His version of Han is a bit less cynical than in the years before A New Hope, but we can see how this latest job has jaded him when it comes to trusting others (well, except maybe Chewie).


Emily Blunt in front of a weather screen in Disclosure Day

Advertisement


Every Steven Spielberg Movie of the 2020s, Ranked

Post-pandemic Steven Spielberg already feels like a distinct era.

Advertisement

Admittedly, Solo struggles at times with its eye-rolling droid subplot, an overreliance on fan-service, and some half-baked franchise cameos. There’s no doubt about it. However, the film’s positively nostalgic tone and careful attention to character mix well with the Kasdans’ clear goal of unpacking what makes Han Solo tick. In short, unlike many of the Disney efforts that have since graced the big or small screens, Solo feels like Star Wars — even without the Jedi.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Sydney Sweeney Addresses Zendaya Feud Rumors ‘Narratives’

Published

on

Premiere Of HBO's Euphoria Season 3

Sydney Sweeney finally points out the culprit behind her highly speculated dynamic with Zendaya.

The “Euphoria” star has clarified on what truly transpired between her and Zendaya on the set of their HBO series and how it has played out in real life, truly amplified by fans.

Sydney Sweeney and her co-star were introduced to the world on the HBO hit series, written by Sam Levinson. The series first premiered in 2019 and launched Sweeney’s career as one of the most sought-after stars in Hollywood.

Premiere Of HBO's Euphoria Season 3
ZUMAPRESS.com / MEGA

The release of the third season of “Euphoria” came with several speculations about an ongoing feud between Sweeney and Zendaya. According to theories, the stars were not getting along due to Sweeney’s alleged political leanings and an alleged secret affection for Zendaya’s fiancé, Tom Holland.

Viewers had noticed that Sweeney and Zendaya shared little to no screen time from pictures and clips behind the scenes on set. However, Sweeney has pushed back on that narrative, suggesting that social media and all its users have a way of exaggerating normal production interaction into realities.

Advertisement

Sweeney noted that the cast of “Euphoria” practically grew up together on stage, and it has been an out-of-body experience to see several untrue theories being propagated about their relationship.

“It’s honestly crazy to watch how much social media and the press spin things,” she said. “I was in first position to HBO. So the moment they say, ‘Hey, this is the first day of filming,’ I’m legally not allowed to do anything else. So my schedule doesn’t affect the show. And so that was funny to watch everybody spin narratives on it. All of us were in first position, so it wasn’t like any of our schedules were holding it up.”

She made the comment in a recent interview with Vanity Fair, but fans noticed that Sweeney did not directly address rumors about Zendaya specifically. That being said, fans have seen her post behind-the-scenes photos of the series, in which the actress was missing. Instead, cast members such as Jacob Elordi, Alexa Demie, and the late Eric Dane graced the gallery.

Rumors have also been around the block for years, with unverified reports claiming that Sweeney had previously expressed interest in Holland after rummaging through his internet posts.

Advertisement

The Marvel Star’s Absence From ‘Euphoria’ Photoshoot Gets A New Explanation 

Zendaya arrives at the Premiere 'Euphoria' Season 3
Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency / MEGA

Other reports noted that Zendaya did not participate with Sweeney in promotional photoshoots that were connected to Season 3, and the two actresses seemed to stay apart in public photoshoots.

The speculation continued to ramp up in March when Sweeney was conspicuously missing from a Euphoria photoshoot of the cast. 

As shared by The Blast, later reports clarified that Sweeney’s absence was due to filming, not personal conflict. Once again, questions arose after the Season 3 premiere when viewers shared videos online and thought the actresses looked distant from each other.

However, not all people involved in the HBO series endorse the story. Rumors of behind-the-scenes tension were brushed aside by cast member Jessica Blair Herman, who said the atmosphere was very different.

During her television appearance, Herman explained that it was an ideal match for the actresses because they had established a professional relationship with each other. 

Advertisement

When asked about the lack of behind-the-scenes footage of the two together, Herman explained that their characters rarely shared scenes. She added that filming was frequently on different schedules, which meant there were fewer opportunities for interaction than fan expectations may have.

Sydney Sweeney Defended Her Character’s Choices, Insists Her Person Is A Separate Entity

Sydney Sweeney poses in jean shorts in new American Eagle campaign
American Eagle/ MEGA

The Blast stated that the media personality drew a clear line between herself and her “Euphoria” viral character, Cassie Howard.

After witnessing serious backlash over Cassie’s storyline on the show’s third season, especially about the OnlyFans gig, Sweeney insisted that portraying a character does not mean endorsing every decision they make.

The actress continued that the show’s creator, Levinson, walked her through Cassie’s arc before filming and made space for conversations about the direction of the storyline.

Sweeney explained that while she may not personally relate to Cassie’s choices or make the same decisions in real life, her responsibility as an actor is to commit to the character’s journey fully.

Advertisement

For her, the goal was not to judge Cassie but to portray her honestly, and this also means completely embracing the character’s emotional extremes and vulnerability while bringing Levinson’s creative vision to screen.

The Actress Was Reportedly Very Interested In Completely Embodying Cassie Howard

Sydney Sweeney poses in jean shorts in new American Eagle campaign
American Eagle/ MEGA

In the spirit of true professionalism, Sweeney gave further insights into the journey and story of Cassie, establishing that she never saw her choices as random.

The actress noted that Cassie’s actions, however perceived, were rooted in patterns which were fueled by emotional inadequacies and a constant search for validation.

She added that Cassie only felt seen and worthy when people loved her, and her decision to go into the adult industry was an extension of that mindset.

For Sweeney, it was not just about paying attention to Cassie but being seen as important, understood, and a piece of a larger puzzle than her day-to-day life.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Levinson revealed his initial thoughts to make the storyline more ambiguous, and he looked at decreasing the nudity on Cassie’s arc. However, Sweeney rejected the notion as it would be cheating on the world of the character to avoid engaging it.

Levinson stated the discussion influenced his method of shooting and the value of remaining honest with the character’s journey. He went on to commend her dedication on set, saying she was bold in her choices and always ready to be in the part.

Sydney Sweeney Cements Her Hollywood Takeover With New Production Company

Sydney Sweeney
Xavier Collin/Image Press Agency/MEGA

The actress added another feather to her cap and dipped her feet into the challenging waters of production with the launch of her production company, Honey Trap.

As noted by The Blast, Sweeney stated that the company’s creative vision is the ability to tell bold, emotionally charged stories in film and television, using contrasts and complexity. 

She co-founded it with her longtime collaborator Kaylee McGregor, and the company has begun moving forward with some projects, including an upcoming “Barbella” remake in conjunction with Sony.

Advertisement

Honey Trap also landed its first major feature project with an adaptation of filmmaker and author Lindsey Anderson Beer’s debut novel, “Hollow.” 

Sweeney will reportedly star in and produce the movie, while Beer will direct and adapt the script. Backed by LuckyChap Entertainment and Beer’s Lab Brew, the project marks a major step for Honey Trap, along with its first-look partnership with Sony Pictures.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

What happened to the original cast of “Hawaii Five-O”? All about the stars' lives after the show

Published

on


Cue up Morton Stevens’ indelible theme song.

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Ari Fletcher Drops Spicy Response To Tweet About Jayda Cheaves

Published

on

Ari Fletcher Spicy Response Clapback Tweet Jayda Cheaves Lil Baby 

Ari Fletcher was once known for dragging trolls for filth on social media. We’re talking Rihanna on Twitter back in the day type of drag! While it appears she’s held back that energy in recent years, she isn’t above clocking any piss the internet confuses for tea! She did so recently regarding assumptions about her relationship with Moneybagg Yo. And on Tuesday (June 9), she again slammed another social media user. This time, though, Ari went IN after an X user claimed Jayda Cheaves previously proved Fletcher is a wimp.

RELATED: Ari Fletcher Checks Troll For Bringing Up Her Marriage Plans With Moneybagg Yo After Flexing Her Ring Collection

Ari Fletcher Pops OFF Over Jayda Cheaves Mention

On June 9, Ari Fletcher hopped on X to warn a mystery person who has allegedly been sending subliminal shade her way. She wrote, “Keep subbing me and I’m gone embarrass yo a*s all over this internet.” In less than 24 hours, the tweet collected over one million views, more than 8,400 likes and over 200 replies. Again, it’s unclear who Ari was directing the tweet at.

One reply in particular seemed to catch Ari’s attention, at least enough to warrant a spicy response. X user @thesebitcesmad replied, “Girl literally nobody is worried about you lmaoo Jayda been showed us your P*SSYYYY.” The reply, which came one minute after Ari posted the tweet, included a GIF on Jayda Cheaves flexing her inches.

Advertisement

Another minute after the shady response from @thesebitcesmad and Fletcher was on their head! She quoted the post, replying, “Jayda ain’t never showed me sh*t b*tch.” At the time this article was written, that was Ari’s most recent post on X. Additionally, it doesn’t appear that Jayda has responded to the name-drop.

What’s The Beef Between Ari & Jayda?

As previously reported, the internet learned of tension between Ari Fletcher and Jayda Cheaves earlier this year in January. At the time, TikTok was feeding on rumors of Lil Baby and Ari having a past sexual relationship. Neither of them addressed it, but Jayda Wayda appeared to. In a livestream, she said, “Them rumors are true. No shade! That’s been going on, that been a thing.” Her comment followed a viewer asking, “The TikTok rumors about Ari and Baby??” Wayda later appeared to double down in the comment section of another post, writing, “BEEEEEEENNNN.”

While Ari Fletcher never directly addressed the shade, she previously revealed that her and Jayda were no longer friends. She spilled her own tea about the friendship break while appearing on ‘Caresha Please’ in 2023 and clarified that she had “No desire to be cool.”

@bigjennyfromtheblock

#arifletcher clarifies relationship with jaydacheavesand more . . . . . . . . . . #careshaplease#arifletcher#jayda#fyp#beef#revolttv#deleon#friends#hair#makeup#bet

Advertisement

♬ original sound – BigJuice🫧

RELATED: Jayda Cheaves Has Social Media Users Mentioning Lil Baby After She Opened Up About Regrets & Forcing Things

What Do You Think Roomies?

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Netflix Officially Found Its Next ‘Stranger Things’ Problem

Published

on

03112487_poster_w780.jpg

All good things must come to an end, and Stranger Things is no exception. Netflix’s hit science fiction series aired its super-sized finale at the beginning of 2026, and in the process brought an end to one of its biggest hits…or so fans thought. Netflix has been eager to continue expanding the Stranger Things franchise in different forms with Stranger Things: Tales From ’85, an animated series that takes place between Seasons 2 and 3, and Stranger Things: The First Shadow, a stage play that expands upon the origins of the villainous Vecna (Jamie Campbell Bower). Creators Ross & Matt Duffer even managed to recapture some of Stranger Things‘ magic by producing Netflix’s latest sci-fi hit, The Boroughs.

Despite this slew of successful spin-offs, Netflix has already hit a snag when it comes to Stranger Things. That snag comes with the fact that Stranger Things: Tales from ’85 has been renewed for a second season. While this sounds like a good thing, especially since Netflix tends to be pretty cavalier about axing shows before they get a proper run, a single question remains: how much more story does this franchise have left to tell? More importantly, how far can Netflix go before it runs the risk of running Stranger Things into the ground?

Advertisement

‘Stranger Things’ Has More or Less Told A Complete Story

For whatever criticisms fans could lay at Stranger Things‘ feet, they can’t deny that the series told a complete story over five seasons. Adding more spinoffs threatens to ruin that delicate balance, especially where Tales from ’85 is concerned. No matter how long the series lasts, it’ll have to end things in a way that doesn’t contradict Stranger Things Season 3. There’s also the fact that Tales from ’85 has introduced a new character in the form of Nikki Baxter (Odessa A’zion). Given that Nikki isn’t mentioned throughout Stranger Things, Tales from ’85will have to address her absence in a way that aligns with the rest of the show.



















Advertisement

Collider Exclusive · Sci-Fi Personality Quiz
Which Sci-Fi Hero Are You Most Like?
Paul Atreides · Captain Kirk · Princess Leia · Ellen Ripley · Max Rockatansky

Five iconic heroes. Five completely different ways of facing an impossible universe. One of them shares your instincts, your values, and your particular way of refusing to back down. Eight questions will tell you which one.

🏜️Paul Atreides

🖖Capt. Kirk

Advertisement

Princess Leia

🔦Ellen Ripley

🔥Max Rockatansky

Advertisement

01

How do you lead when the stakes couldn’t be higher?
The way you lead under pressure is the most honest thing about you.





Advertisement

02

What is your greatest strength in a crisis?
The quality that keeps you alive when everything else fails.





Advertisement

03

What is the thing you’d sacrifice everything else for?
Your deepest motivation is your truest compass.





Advertisement

04

How do you relate to the people around you?
Who you are to others under pressure is who you really are.





Advertisement

05

You’re facing a threat that no one else believes is real. What do you do?
How you respond when you’re the only one who sees it defines everything.





Advertisement

06

What has your heroism cost you personally?
Every hero pays. The question is what — and whether they’d pay it again.





Advertisement

07

How do you feel about the rules of the world you’re in?
Every hero has a relationship with the system. What’s yours?





Advertisement

08

When everything is on the line, what keeps you going?
The answer is the most honest thing about you.





Advertisement

Your Hero Has Been Identified
Your Sci-Fi Hero Is…

Your answers point to the iconic sci-fi hero who shares your instincts, your values, and your particular way of facing the impossible.

Advertisement


Arrakis · Dune

Paul Atreides
Advertisement

You carry a weight most people would crumble under — the knowledge of what you’re capable of, and the burden of what you might have to become.

  • You see further ahead than others and you plan accordingly, even when the vision frightens you.
  • You are driven by loyalty to your people and a sense of destiny you didn’t ask for but can’t escape.
  • Paul Atreides is not simply a hero — he is someone who understands the cost of power and chooses to bear it anyway.
  • That gravity, that willingness to carry what others won’t, is exactly you.


USS Enterprise · Star Trek

Captain Kirk
Advertisement

You lead with instinct, warmth, and an absolute refusal to accept a no-win scenario — because you’ve always believed there’s a third option nobody else has thought of yet.

  • You take the mission seriously without ever taking yourself too seriously.
  • Your crew would follow you anywhere, not because you demand it, but because you’ve earned it.
  • Kirk’s genius isn’t tactical — it’s human. He reads people, bends rules with purpose, and wills outcomes into existence through sheer conviction.
  • That combination of warmth, audacity, and relentless optimism is unmistakably yours.


The Rebellion · Star Wars

Princess Leia
Advertisement

You are the kind of person who holds the line when everyone else is losing faith — not because you’re fearless, but because giving up simply isn’t something you’re capable of.

  • You lead through conviction. Your voice carries because your belief is unshakeable.
  • You gave up everything ordinary the moment you chose the cause, and you’ve never looked back.
  • Leia is not a supporting character in her own story — she is the moral centre of the entire rebellion.
  • That same fierce, principled, unbreakable core is what defines you.


The Nostromo · Alien

Ellen Ripley
Advertisement

You are not reckless, not grandiose, and not particularly interested in being anyone’s hero — you just refuse to stop when it matters.

  • You see threats clearly, you document the truth even when no one listens, and when the time comes you handle it yourself.
  • Ripley’s heroism is earned, not performed. She doesn’t have a speech — she has a flamethrower and a plan.
  • You share her composure under the worst possible pressure, and her refusal to pretend the monster isn’t there.
  • When it counts, you don’t flinch. That’s everything.


The Wasteland · Mad Max

Max Rockatansky
Advertisement

You have been through fire that would break most people — and what came out the other side is something the world underestimates at its peril.

  • You don’t ask for help, don’t need validation, and don’t wait for anyone to tell you the rules no longer apply.
  • Your loyalty, when it finally arrives, is absolute — but it’s earned in silence and tested in action, not in words.
  • Max is not a nihilist. He is someone who lost everything and found, against his will, that he still has something worth protecting.
  • That bruised, stubborn, ultimately human core is exactly yours.

Advertisement

Netflix is about to lose the creative minds behind Stranger Things, as Ross & Matt Duffer are set to leave the streamer for a more lucrative deal at Paramount. The timing couldn’t be worse, as the Duffer Brothers have not only produced one hit with The Boroughs but two thanks to the smash success of the horror series Something Very Bad Is Going to Happen. Netflix would be hard-pressed to find creative minds on the Duffers’ level, which means that the streamer should remember that Stranger Things became a hit thanks to word of mouth. If Netflix wants another hit series in that vein, it should step back and let incoming creators fulfill their vision.

There’s One Way ‘Stranger Things’ Could Continue

Stranger Things: Tales from ’85 and Stranger Things: The First Shadow both share the distinction of taking place within the Stranger Things timeline, meaning that they’re bound by events that have already happened in the narrative. There’s an easy workaround if Netflix wants to continue the franchise, and it lies with Holly Wheeler (Nell Fisher). Holly becomes an integral part of Stranger Things‘ final season, as she’s among a group of children who are imprisoned by Vecna, yet she manages to escape with the help of Max Mayfield (Sadie Sink). The Stranger Things series finale, “The Rightside Up,” more or less passes the torch to Holly and her friends, as they start their own game of Dungeons & Dragons. Ross Duffer noted in an interview with Netflix’s official site, Tudum, that this was meant to bring the series full circle.

“This is about this group of characters saying goodbye to their childhood. That basement, specifically the Dungeons & Dragons game, represents their childhoods [and it’s] how we first met them as an audience. To say goodbye to it, you have to play one last time.”

Though the adventures of Will (Noah Schnapp) and his friends have come to an end, Holly and her friends could potentially still go on their own adventures, especially if Stranger Things: Tales from ’85 leaves some plot threads dangling. Simply put, if Netflix wants to continue building on Stranger Things, it needs to look forward rather than backwards.

Advertisement


03112487_poster_w780.jpg

Advertisement


Release Date

2016 – 2025-00-00

Advertisement

Network

Netflix

Advertisement
Directors

Matt Duffer, Ross Duffer, Andrew Stanton, Frank Darabont, Nimród Antal, Uta Briesewitz

Writers
Advertisement

Kate Trefry, Jessie Nickson-Lopez, Jessica Mecklenburg, Alison Tatlock

Advertisement

Advertisement


Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Entertainment

Days of our Lives Early Spoilers June 15-19: Stephanie Horrified & Roman Furious

Published

on

Days of Our Lives Spoilers: Stephanie Johnson (Abigail Klein) - Roman Brady (Josh Taylor)

Days of Our Lives early weekly spoilers for June 15th through the 19th. And we’ll see Stephanie Johnson (Abigail Klein) horrified that she almost killed Alex Kiriakis’s (Robert Scott Wilson) baby mama. Plus, Roman Brady (Josh Taylor) is livid that Kate Roberts (Lauren Koslow) been lying to his face and now she faces huge fallout.

There’s a bunch of consequences coming in these two weeks. So, let’s get into what you’ll see the week of June 15th, and as we always do on early edition day, we start with the rest of this week and then we dive into all the good stuff that is going to be coming up next week.

Days of Our Lives: Wednesday & Thursday – Shocking Incidents and Confessions

So, on Wednesday, June 10th, we have the scene where we’re picking back up from Tuesday. Stephanie just fired off a shot at Joy Wesley (AlexAnn Hopkins). So Stephanie was jet-lagged and popping what I’m guessing was maybe an Ambien and then she laid down to nap fresh off the plane from Asia. She made sure that her unlocked and loaded gun was at hand. So, Stephanie woke up and decided to shoot. No doubt Jada Hunter (Elia Cantu) gets involved.

Because you can’t just fire off a gun in an apartment building and not expect the cops to come. Plus, that bullet might have actually made it across the hall into Jada’s apartment. Stephanie didn’t kill Joy because we’ve got more spoilers for her. But Joy’s going to be shocked and terrified. And that visit where they were planning to have Kelsey come spend time with Alex and Stephanie isn’t going to be happening soon. I thought Alex was moving too fast, giving Joy a key.

Advertisement

And I also thought Alex should have talked to Stephanie privately before he even offered it. So, of course, she’s going to feel bad for firing a gun at Alex’s baby mama, but also Stephanie followed none of her dad, Steve Johnson’s (Stephen Nichols) gun safety rules. If Stephanie had, she wouldn’t have been able to just make a pot shot like that.

DOOL Spoilers: Alex is Horrified

So, Alex is going to be horrified, understandably, because you know what? If Kelsey had been with Joy, what if the bullet hadn’t gone astray? Also, Leo Stark (Greg Rikaart) warns Gwen Rizczech (Emily O’Brien) to be careful. She may report back to Leo what EJ DiMera (Dan Feuerriegel) told her about Xander Cook Kiriakis (Paul Telfer) and Kristen DiMera (Stacy Haiduk), but then says, “Oh, it turned out to be innocent.” But since Leo cheated with her husband behind Gwen’s naive back, it could be that Leo is warning Gwen to not be so trusting this time.

Also on Wednesday, Amy Choi (Shi Ne Nielson) has a heart-to-heart with Melinda Trask (Tina Huang). Amy still wants vengeance for Sophia’s death, but I wonder if Melinda will caution her to just focus on your grief. Leave well enough alone. Jada and Shawn Brady (Brandon Beemer) get much closer. They may kiss soon. They have a date this week at Small Bar. And Jada is all cuddled up, getting hands-on with Hunky Shawn.

Tate Donovan Black (Leo Howard) and Holly Jonas (Ashley Puzemis) get romantic, but things are going to go sideways soon for her. In the meantime, Tate is giving Holly some personal training at the dojo. Looks like they are working out some stress with some karate or something.

Advertisement

Thursday, June 11th, Paulina Price (Jackée Harry) goes to extremes for her daughter Chanel Dupree (Raven Bowens). So, this may be about her breast cancer. So, we might see Paulina finding a female oncologist to help Chanel that has a better bedside manner. She and Johnny are both leaving the show this fall, late fall. We’re not sure the exact date since both of the actors were let go. So, we’ll see if Chanel’s cancer is what sends her and her hubby out of Salem.

Days of our Lives Spoilers: Kate Fesses Up

Kate has to fully confess to Roman. So, right now, Kate’s mad at Xander for forcing her hand and dropping the lawsuit. and he advised Kate to tell Roman everything before somebody else does. Kate has been lying to Roman’s face about being involved with the Johnny and Bonnie book debacle.

So now Kate is confessing and Roman is ranting to Kate that he thought they were all done with the lying. And what was worse is Roman even apologized to Kate for wrongly accusing her when he was rightly accusing her. Now Roman’s going to be so mad over all this. His hands over his mouth in absolute shock when Kate starts coming clean.

Days of our Lives Spoilers: Xander Battles EJ

Also, we’ve got Xander sparring with EJ. And we know that Kristen was just griping to Xander about EJ being a total pratt. And since Gwen revealed that EJ told her he saw Xander and Kristen, you know, that could be what starts this. Xander is really enjoying sleeping with Kristen. And I don’t think he wants Gwen’s drama if she finds out.

Advertisement

So he may confront EJ about being a blabbermouth. Clearly Xander hooking up with anybody bothers EJ because he was griping about Gwen having Xander over to the mansion for sleepovers. And EJ was also griping to Gabi Hernandez (Cherie Jimenez) about his sister shagging Xander. Maybe EJ’s jealous because nobody’s shagging him right now.

Holly and Ari Horton (Vico Escorcia) get a gift from Sarah Horton (Linsey Godfrey).

Days of Our Lives: Friday – Gun Violence and Cat’s Deception

And then on Friday, June 12th, Steve Johnson and Kayla Brady (Mary Beth Evans) are there for Stephanie. So, after she fires the gun at Joy, it looks like Alex brings Stephanie’s parents over because Steve and Kayla are at their apartment this week. They may take Stephanie home with them, and that could be because she’s distraught and doesn’t want to be at the apartment where she did this bad thing.

Steve and Kayla hold a crying Stephanie. Looks like she wakes up from a nightmare, no doubt, about this shooting incident. And honestly, I hope Steve takes that gun back, unless of course, Jada confiscates it when she chastises Stephanie for opening fire on an innocent woman.

Advertisement

Cat Greene (AnnaLynne McCord) tells EJ more lies. He’s asking Cat if this is how she came into contact with Clyde Weston (James Read). Sounds like Cat is feeding him big fibs about false memories of Italy to make sure EJ doesn’t learn about her ISA connection. And then Cat and EJ wind up in a passionate lip lock by the end of this week. And I think this is Cat faking more memories or distracting him because she’s determined to get the goods on EJ.

Days of our Lives Spoilers: Alex Tries to Reason with Joy

Alex tries to get Joy to see reason. She may be packing her bags to take Kelsey back to New York for her safety, for the baby’s safety. I mean, no lie, Stephanie was way too trigger happy. Somebody on Ambien doesn’t need a gun like that. And Joy isn’t going to want her daughter at risk. Even her crush on Alex isn’t worth being shot.

Shawn and Jada talk about their growing feelings likely when they’re out on the date this week. Plus, Chad DiMera (Connor Floyd) takes Belle Black (Martha Madison), Thomas, and Charlotte DiMera (Autumn Gendron) to a Cubs game. Chad and Belle have their first kiss after the baseball game, and the kids look super excited to be out with the two of them.

Days of Our Lives Spoilers: Stephanie Johnson (Abigail Klein) - Roman Brady (Josh Taylor)Days of Our Lives Spoilers: Stephanie Johnson (Abigail Klein) - Roman Brady (Josh Taylor)
Days of Our Lives Spoilers: Stephanie Johnson – Roman Brady  

Days of Our Lives: June 15th-19th – Secrets Unraveling and Danger Ahead

Then, the week of June 15th through the 19th on Days of our Lives, Leo may push Gwen to keep a closer eye on Xander and Kristen because all of this is suspicious. They made that cover story about working together, but if Gwen circles back to EJ, he may tell her there is no business going on between Titan and DiMera and it was a lie and Xander and Kristen fooled her. EJ confronts Kristen about consorting with the enemy.

Of course, EJ has no idea that she wanted Xander to kill him. And when he finds out that she was trying to get Sophia to kill Johnny, you know, I think Kristen better watch her back. So, right now though, EJ just thinks that Kristen and Xander are bumping their bits and has no idea that murder was a topic on the agenda. Not that Xander even considered it even for a minute.

Advertisement

Leo may do a little digging on his own to protect Gwen, even if she’s still not open to hugs from him. So, he may start following Kristen and Xander around.

Days of our Lives Spoilers: Rachel Flips Out

Liam Selejko (Hank Northrop) is going to be back to Salem soon. Brady Black (Eric Martsolf) is going to find him as part of this research to help Sarah figure out what went on with Destiny and her sister Clea. And then Ari is going to get the goods on what Gabi did once she finally is able to corner Liam and demand to know why he left and just ghosted her.

Rachel’s going to freak out when Brady and Kristen break the news to her soon about Sophia’s death. Rachel’s worried she won’t ever get better if the Bayview doctors couldn’t help Sophia.

Cat keeps toying with EJ and won’t listen to Rafe Hernandez (Galen Gering) about standing down. Ralph keeps testing and assessing Lexie Carver (Nikki Crawford), looking for answers about her symptoms and a way to stop them from progressing. And Dimitri von Leuschner DiMera (Peter Porte) is going to be back in Salem soon to stir up trouble. And he’s going to have a tense meeting with Rafe, Gwen, and Leo.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025