Nigel Farage today repeated his claim that a Reform UK government would stop small boats crossing the Channel ‘within a fortnight’.
The Reform leader reiterated the pledge as he unveiled his party’s ‘Operation Fortress’ plan to deploy the Royal Navy to return Channel migrants.
Under the ‘return and rescue’ proposal, the Royal Navy would intercept every vessel carrying illegal migrants to the UK and return all those on board to their country of departure.
Mr Farage compared the plan to how Australia has previously used military vessels to tow migrant boats back to Indonesia.
‘I am entirely confident that under a Reform government, within a fortnight, there would be no more boats,’ he told a press conference in Westminster.
Both Mr Farage and Zia Yusuf, Reform’s home affairs spokesman, defended the plans amid questions about the legality of such a scheme and the likely cost to taxpayers.
They Reform leader also insisted there would be ‘big upsides’ to France, despite suggestions that Paris would simply refuse to accept migrants returned to the country’s northern shores.
Mr Farage pointed to how Britain is currently on track to hand France more than £1billion to stop small boat migrants.
Nigel Farage today insisted Reform UK’s ‘Operation Fortress’ plan to deploy the Royal Navy to return Channel migrants is in keeping with international law
A group of migrants board a small boat off the coast of Equihen-Plage in France during an attempt to cross the Channel
Mr Farage and Zia Yusuf, Reform’s home affairs spokesman, defended the proposal amid questions about its legality and likely cost to taxpayers
‘Operation Fortress will be a combined military operation,’ Mr Farage said, as he set out his party’s plans.
‘It will save lives, it will help the French in fulfilling their job of stopping the boats and it will save a huge amount of money.
‘We are very confident that our policy of securely picking people up and safely taking them back to France – we are entirely confident that that falls within other conventions of international law.’
Mr Farage added: ‘When you think about it, what is the Royal Navy for?
‘If the Royal Navy is not there to protect this country from invasion, then, frankly, I can’t see what its purpose is.’
Asked whether he’d received any assurances that France would cooperate with Reform’s plans, Mr Farage said: ‘For the French there are big upsides, very big upsides.
‘Life from Dunkirk through Calais, through Hardelot, Wimereux, all those rather beautiful little villages on Côte d’Opale, life is now hell.
‘People stay locked in their houses, you can’t resell a house, there’s crime, there’s litter, there’s vandalism, there’s gang violence, there are stabbings, there are shootings.
‘Dealing with this problem would be a great, great relief to the people of northern France. So that’s the first thing I would say, there is a big upside to the French in this.
‘Have we had talks with some senior French political figures about this? Yes, and I think attitudes are starting to change.
‘And they are also beginning to realise we have given them a lot of money and this would, in fact, be helping them with their objectives.
‘Are we there yet, can I guarantee you that they’ll welcome this with open arms? I can’t.
‘But can I say there is a softening of attitude towards this position? Yes. And, of course, we have some very major French elections coming up next year.’
Mr Farage said the scenes from Ceuta, a Spanish territory in North Africa where around 60,000 migrants last week breached the border with Morocco, showed ‘just how serious this situation is’.
He also claimed that ‘absolutely enormous’ sums could be saved for taxpayers under Reform’s plans as he insisted his party was not ‘upping the cost’ of dealing with the Channel crisis.
‘All these deals with the French, we have just handed over more and more money, the more money we hand over, the more migrants that come,’ Mr Farage said.
‘If this operation that we talked about today it would, in short order, save this country certainly two, maybe three, maybe more, billions of pounds every single year.
‘And the long-term saving of it would be absolutely enormous.’
Mr Yusuf had earlier defended the proposals against claims the Royal Navy currently doesn’t have enough ships to return migrants back across the Channel.
Tom Sharpe, a former Royal Navy commander, said Reform’s policy ‘starts to unravel quite quickly’.
‘There’s a notion that the Royal Navy could steam in over the horizon and fix this problem, which is declining slightly anyway,’ he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
‘The reality, when you start looking at what ships we have, which is basically none.
‘He’s talking about the largest maritime operation in the Channel since World War Two – a very evocative image, but that’s not the reality. We don’t have the ships.
‘And if you do bring your ships to bear, and you start investigating what exactly you’re going to do with them and where, it starts to unravel quite quickly.’
He added: ‘A billion-pound warship that’s configured for anti-air warfare or anti-submarine warfare, which are both threats to the UK, is not best used ferrying people around. You’re better off using an actual ferry.’
But responding to those criticisms, Mr Yusuf told the same programme: ‘The vessels we are talking about using are, first of all, the Bay Class ships, the second one would be offshore river patrol vessels, and on those vessels you have things called RHIBs; rigid hulled inflatable boats.
‘These are very small, highly manoeuvrable Navy vessels, which will have Royal Marines on board that will be used to go right up alongside these illegal migrant dinghies, take them on board and escort them back to France.’
Asked what would happen if France refused to accept migrants that had been returned by Britain’s military, Mr Yusuf said: ‘In the event they do not consent the marines will nevertheless… escort the migrants onto the beaches of France and if the French disagree what will end up happening is we will end up having something of an argument with the French.’
He questioned why UK politicians would be ‘unwilling to have an argument with the French and the Elysee Palace over the invasion of Britain’.
Pressed further on what would happen if France did not let the migrants disembark on its beaches, Mr Yusuf added: ‘That would mean the French committing a crime against humanity, that is what would be happening.
‘This is a boat full of innocent civilians who are being rescued as part of a humanitarian mission.
‘If the French chose to do as you’re suggesting… the idea that President [Emmanuel] Macron would order the gendarmerie, the coastguard or anybody else under his control to commit a crime against humanity… I do not think that is a serious hypothetical.’
He went on: ‘We’ve got extensive legal opinion on this, it is legal.’
The French government later hit back at Reform’s plans.
A spokesman for the French interior ministry said in a statement: ‘This would be a violation of French sovereignty as well as a violation of maritime law and international law.
‘Separately, as part of the measures put in place with the UK and the arrangements deployed at the local level, the interior ministry states that the number of crossings is down in 2026.’
Downing Street insisted that border patrol officers were ‘best suited’ to deal with small boat crossings.
Asked about Reform’s proposal to deploy the Royal Navy, the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: ‘The Royal Navy had primacy for small boat crossings under the previous government in 2022. I’d remind you there was no reduction in small boat crossings in that period.
‘The Royal Navy is already tackling many threats, including monitoring any Russian warships operating near our shores, protecting our waters and our critical national infrastructure.
‘Border patrol officers have significant capabilities and skills that make them the best suited candidate to lead small boats operations in the Channel.
‘That’s why we’re driving down the number of crossings. It’s why they’re down almost 50 per cent compared to last year, and why almost 60 per cent of attempted crossings have been stopped since this Government came to power.’
Tory shadow home secretary Chris Philp accused Reform of putting forward ‘slogans and policies written on the back of a fag packet but no credibility behind it – they can’t answer basic questions like how they would properly fund the military’.
He added: ‘They haven’t even got a defence spokesman and they can’t answer basic questions like what they would do if the French refuse to allow the illegal immigrants to be disembarked back in France.’
Mr Philp said the Conservatives ‘would deport these illegal immigrants back to their country of origin, and if that’s not possible, a safe third country like Rwanda’.
A Labour spokesman accused Reform of ‘reheating an old announcement in their desperate bid to distract from sleaze scandals’.
‘The actions we’ve taken have started to have a real impact and led to 46,000 attempted crossings stopped, and 70,000 people with no right to be here removed,’ they said.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login