Connect with us
DAPA Banner

NewsBeat

Cardiologist says popular breakfast food is a ‘cholesterol bomb’

Published

on

Belfast Live

A cardiologist has warned about three worst foods with high cholesterol – with one popular breakfast item described as a ‘cholesterol bomb’

A leading cardiologist has identified the three worst foods for people aiming to lower their cholesterol levels, with one item labelled a “cholesterol bomb”.

Dr Steven Lome, a cardiologist at Rush Copley in Aurora, Illinois, made the revelations during an appearance on the Physicians Committee podcast, where he outlined the most problematic foods for cholesterol management.

Advertisement

Before examining these foods, it’s worth understanding that cholesterol comes in two primary forms: HDL and LDL. HDL cholesterol is considered ‘good’ cholesterol as it can lower the chances of developing heart disease or suffering a stroke.

LDL cholesterol, conversely, is regarded as bad cholesterol, as excessive amounts can cause arterial blockages and heighten heart disease risk.Consequently, maintaining elevated HDL cholesterol levels whilst keeping LDL cholesterol low is crucial.

When discussing the three principal foods to steer clear of, Dr Lome highlighted processed meats, red meats, and eggs as the primary culprits. He explained: “Processed meats, pepperoni, baloney, salami, sausage, things like that, they’re extremely high in saturated fat and, most of the time most, saturated fat has the biggest impact and they are high in saturated fat.

“They also have a good amount of dietary cholesterol which we need to remember, dietary cholesterol is not an essential nutrient. Processed meats I think by far would be the worst.

Advertisement

“Next, I would put red meats which still would be high in cholesterol and saturated fat significantly so you really want to get rid of those. And then eggs.”

Dr Steven delivered a particularly striking assessment when discussing eggs, stating: “Eggs are a cholesterol bomb, I hear people call them. That yolk is just so full of cholesterol. In most surveys, eggs are the number one source of dietary cholesterol in the American diet.”

The relationship between diet and cholesterol levels extends beyond mere speculation, with numerous studies examining how various foods affect overall health.

Advertisement

Eggs

Multiple research papers have explored the connection between egg consumption and cholesterol levels. One investigation published in the Science Direct journal examined the effect of eggs on blood lipid profiles and whether they warrant inclusion in our diets.

The researchers found: “When combined with healthy eating patterns that include more dietary fibre or fish, eggs may be beneficially associated with lipid outcomes. Overall, these results provide no evidence that egg intake should be limited when consumed as a part of a fibre-rich, heart- healthy diet.”

Meanwhile, separate research indicated that eggs might contribute to elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Published in the Nutrients journal, researchers concluded: “Notably, longer-term high egg-consumption may lead to higher LDL-c/HDL-c ratio and LDL-c. However, RCTs with long tern follow-up are needed to guarantee the association between egg consumption and human health.”

Red and Processed Meat

Advertisement

Both red and processed meat have been associated with a heightened risk of heart disease according to research published by the University of Oxford. Publishing their study in the Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition journal they found that higher intakes of red and processed meat could increase the risk of heart disease.

In a statement following the publication of the findings, co-lead author of the study Dr Keren Papier said: “Red and processed meat have been consistently linked with bowel cancer and our findings suggest an additional role in heart disease.

“Therefore, current recommendations to limit red and processed meat consumption may also assist with the prevention of coronary heart disease.”

For more information on how to reduce your cholesterol, visit the NHS website.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Trump Says His Head Of Counterterrorism Was ‘Weak’ After He Opposes Iran War

Published

on

Trump Says His Head Of Counterterrorism Was ‘Weak’ After He Opposes Iran War

Hours after his head of counter-terrorism quit saying he couldn’t support the war against Iran, President Donald Trump claimed he didn’t really know him that well but that he had “always thought he was weak on security, very weak on security.”

“I always thought he was a nice guy,” Trump told reporters on Tuesday, not long after Joe Kent had announced he had stepped down from running the National Counter-terrorism Centre. “I didn’t know him well.”

That sentiment is at odds with his past praise of the conspiracy theorist who rose in Trump’s estimation for his embrace of the false claim that the 2020 election had been stolen and that the FBI had fomented the January 6, 2021, violent attack on the Capitol.

In fact, Trump’s endless lying about a stolen election enraged his followers, and he himself asked them to converge on Washington DC, on the day of the congressional election certification. It was his own speech hours before the assault, according to many of those who participated, that drove them to violence.

Advertisement
Joe Kent, then-director of the National Counterterrorism Center, testifies in December during the House Homeland Security Committee hearing on “Worldwide Threats to the Homeland.”

Tom Williams via Getty Images

“I think this man has a tremendous future, a very special person,” Trump said of Kent in 2022 as he endorsed his run for Congress in Washington state.

That year, Kent defeated the sitting Republican who had earned Trump’s wrath by voting to impeach him for his coup attempt but then lost the general election to Democrat Marie Gluesenkamp Perez. Kent ran again for that seat in 2024 but lost to Perez a second time.

Trump, after winning back the White House in that election, appointed Kent to a top position in the national security world. “Joe will help us keep America safe by eradicating all terrorism, from the jihadists around the World, to the cartels in our backyard. Congratulations Joe!” Trump wrote in a February 3, 2025, post.

Advertisement

That history apparently was no longer relevant Tuesday for Trump. “I realised that it’s a good thing that he’s out because he said that Iran was not a threat,” he said.

Kent had cited his opposition to Trump’s 17-day-old war. “I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby,” he wrote in a social media post that included an image of his resignation letter.

While Kent has embraced anti-immigrant and white nationalist positions over the years, the theory that Israel pushed Trump into the war was actually laid out by Secretary of State Marco Rubio days after the attack began on February 28.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman known for her longtime opposition to a war with Iran and Kent’s supervisor, on Tuesday afternoon released a statement that neither addressed Kent’s departure nor the wisdom of Trump’s decision to attack Iran.

Advertisement

“As our commander in chief, he is responsible for determining what is and is not an imminent threat, and whether or not to take action he deems necessary to protect the safety and security of our troops, the American people and our country,” she wrote. “After carefully reviewing all the information before him, President Trump concluded that the terrorist Islamist regime in Iran posed an imminent threat and he took action based on that conclusion.”

While Trump in his public comments on Tuesday called Kent “a nice guy,” Trump’s aides and supporters were far less charitable.

Press secretary Karoline Leavitt responded to Kent’s letter with a lengthy, 450-word post of her own. “The absurd allegation that President Trump made this decision based on the influence of others, even foreign countries, is both insulting and laughable,” she wrote.

Taylor Budowich, a former top White House aide, claimed that Kent was about to be fired. “Joe Kent is a crazed egomaniac who was often at the centre of national security leaks, while rarely (never?) producing any actual work,” Budowich wrote. “He spent all of his time working to subvert the chain of command and undermine the president of the United States. This isn’t some principled resignation—he just wanted to make a splash before getting canned. What a loser.”

Advertisement

Olivia Troye, once a national security aide to former Vice President Mike Pence, said the White House likely feels the need to damage Kent’s credibility because of his assertion about Iran. “He actually calls out the lack of imminent threat,” she said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Hidden nuclear bunker under cottage ‘to protect government from nuclear war’

Published

on

Daily Record

The purpose-built underground structure in the countryside was designed to protect government officials from nuclear warfare, and could have sustained its inhabitants for up to three months

Built during the Cold War era, it appears to be an ordinary cottage from street level, yet conceals a vast subterranean bunker designed to shelter government personnel from potential attacks.

Advertisement

Hidden beneath the Essex countryside near Brentwood lies a disused underground complex. Today operating as the Kelvedon Hatch Secret Nuclear Bunker, it functions as a tourist destination and museum, though its original purpose was far more sinister.

This facility was built to serve as a potential regional government headquarters throughout the Cold War period. As a founding NATO member, Britain occupied a crucial position in the conflict as a fundamental partner to the US.

The purpose-built shelter was designed to accommodate hundreds of military and civilian staff should a nuclear strike occur. In such circumstances, it would function as a command centre where regional government would coordinate population survival efforts and maintain essential governmental functions.

Exploring the bunker

The site now welcomes visitors, offering self-guided tours through the tunnels that reveal what operations would have taken place below ground during a nuclear conflict.

The complex extends 125 feet below the surface, and remarkably, access is gained through what looks like an unremarkable bungalow. The guardhouse sits nestled amongst woodland and opens onto a 100-yard tunnel leading underground.

Considering the logistics and planning involved, the bunker was designed to support several hundred personnel for a maximum of three months – naturally requiring air conditioning and heating systems, an independent water source and power generators.

Additionally, it came fully fitted with radio apparatus, secure telecommunications infrastructure and numerous military systems.

Advertisement

The entire communications and technical equipment was located on the first floor, approximately 80 feet beneath ground level. This floor also housed the critically important ‘plotting room’, where aircraft were monitored and tracked round-the-clock, with any explosion analysis conducted there.

The upper level, meanwhile, accommodated the daily living arrangements for those stationed within. It featured a compact yet well-designed medical facility, multiple washrooms, sleeping quarters and even a substantial canteen – the same dining area visitors use nowadays.

Woolly mammoths will be back in 2028, how you could live to 200, alien signals lost in the weather, could we fight Godzilla, and a creature with 20 arms has been found near the Antarctic – all this and more in our latest weird science newsletter

Advertisement

Essential provisions for survival were calculated to last three months, with the assumption this timeframe would allow circumstances to stabilise sufficiently. This would subsequently permit limited ventures outside to obtain additional supplies.

The middle level of the subterranean complex was reserved for governmental use. During the initial construction phase, this level connected to the plotting room through a large opening in the floor, enabling senior RAF commanders to observe developments directly.

The bunker today

The bunker ceased operations in 1992 after becoming obsolete, with its equipment and the surrounding land returned to its initial owners.

The Parish family transformed the facility, converting it into a museum and visitor destination that chronicles Cold War history.

Advertisement

Nowadays, its clandestine status has been somewhat compromised, with the site rather paradoxically advertised throughout the vicinity. Brown tourism signs directing visitors towards the attraction are labelled ‘Secret Nuclear Bunker’ – rather undermining any notion of secrecy.

This intriguing location welcomes spontaneous visits without requiring advance reservations; visitors can arrive and purchase tickets on arrival.

Entry costs £15 for adults, whilst youngsters between five and 16 pay £13. Families can obtain tickets for £38, with additional reductions available for larger parties.

Advertisement

The subterranean attraction opens its doors Thursdays through Sundays, plus during all school holidays and half-term breaks.

To allow sufficient time for a thorough visit, final admission is generally permitted one hour before closure – 4pm on weekdays and 5pm at weekends – though these times are liable to alteration.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Donald Trump slams Keir Starmer AGAIN and says Prime Minister has made ‘big mistake’

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

The US President has repeated his criticism

President Donald Trump said Sir Keir Starmer has made a “big mistake” in his response to US calls for support in the war with Iran as he suggested the “good” trade deal he struck with the UK “probably wasn’t appreciated”.

Mr Trump reiterated his criticism of Sir Keir’s stance on the conflict as he again accused him of not offering sufficient military backing. The president has called on allied nations to provide vessels to help open the Strait of Hormuz and has criticised Sir Keir for so far declining to commit the Royal Navy.

Advertisement

With the war now in a third week, oil prices remain above 100 US dollars (£75) per barrel as a result of Iran’s continued blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.

Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. And don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.

On Tuesday, Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social platform: “The United States has been informed by most of our Nato ‘allies’ that they don’t want to get involved with our military operation against the terrorist regime of Iran.”

He said he was “not surprised” because he had always considered Nato to be a “one-way street”.

Advertisement

“We will protect them, but they will do nothing for us, in particular, in a time of need,” he wrote.

He then added: “Because of the fact that we have had such military success, we no longer ‘need’, or desire, the Nato countries’ assistance — WE NEVER DID!”

And in the White House, Mr Trump said he “liked” the Prime Minister but felt “disappointed” with his recent position in regard to the conflict with Iran. He also described Sir Keir’s policies on both immigration and energy as a “disaster”.

Mr Trump, who was hosting Irish premier Micheal Martin in the White House on Tuesday to mark St Patrick’s Day, also told reporters he was looking forward to welcoming King Charles on his official state visit to the United States.

The president was asked by reporters in the Oval Office whether his relationship with Sir Keir has been damaged by the UK’s stance over the war in Iran.

“Well, he hasn’t been supportive, and I think it’s a big mistake,” replied Mr Trump.

“You know, they make a lot of money on trade with the United States. I went out of my way. As you know, they couldn’t make a deal with Biden, because they had no real administration to make a deal, Biden. But we made a deal. We made a good deal for them and, frankly, probably wasn’t appreciated.

Advertisement

“I do look forward to seeing the King. He’s going to be coming, as you know, very shortly, but, no, I was disappointed, because Keir was willing to send two aircraft carriers after we won, because essentially … there’s no threat for the aircraft carriers right now.

“And I said, ‘no, no, we want things sent before the war, not after the war is won’. So, yeah, I’m disappointed with Keir. I like him, I think he’s a nice man, but I’m disappointed.”

Mr Trump then repeated his assertion that “unfortunately Keir is no Winston Churchill”.

Advertisement

The president went on the claim that the Prime Minister “doesn’t produce”.

Mr Trump told reporters: “Even the aircraft carriers, he would only send them after we essentially won. I mean, he’s sending them when there are no planes left, when the missiles are down to like 8% of the missiles.”

Asked if he had confidence in the Prime Minister, Mr Trump said: “It’s not for me, it’s really for the people of the UK to have confidence.

“I mean, I’ve been very critical of Keir – and I did it in a friendly way – I said, if you don’t change your energy thing and get away from windmills and go back to oil and gas.

Advertisement

“You have something that no other country has, very few countries have anything like it: The North Sea. You have some of the greatest oil and oil deposits in the entire world. The North Sea, they don’t use it.”

Mr Trump added: “I think he’s a nice man, but I disagree with him on two things. Primarily his immigration policy is a disaster, and his energy policy is a disaster – and they’re about the biggest policies you can have.

“You’ve allowed millions and millions and millions of people to come into your country that shouldn’t be there. And, by the way, that’s all over Europe.”

During the Oval Office exchanges, Mr Trump also said he was “disappointed” with Nato, but that he was not currently rethinking his relationship with the alliance.

Advertisement

He said: “We help other countries and when they don’t help us, I mean, it’s certainly something that we should think about.”

Asked if he was afraid that a ground invasion of Iran would be a repeat of the US-Vietnam war, Mr Trump said: “I’m really not afraid of anything.”

Iran’s stranglehold on the Strait of Hormuz has become a key focus of international attention, with several ships in the area reportedly struck by projectiles or debris from intercepted missiles as Tehran seeks to exert economic pressure on the US.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Surprise culprit confirmed in Emmerdale as a herd of cows is kidnapped | Soaps

Published

on

Surprise culprit confirmed in Emmerdale as a herd of cows is kidnapped | Soaps
Of all the people! (Picture: ITV)

There is one Dingle who has always kept themselves away from the lawbreaking antics of their family members in Emmerdale, but even they are about to move over to the dark side in Cain Dingle’s (Jeff Hordley) hour of need. Desperate times call for desperate measures.

The Tates have won the fight for Moira Dingle’s (Natalie J Robb) farm, but Joe Tate (Ned Porteous) isn’t done twisting the knife. Though he’s got what he wanted, he’s having too much fun to stop making everyone else’s life a misery.

Robert Sugden (Ryan Hawley) and Aaron Dingle (Danny Miller) have retained Cain’s herd of cows, but as this was not part of their lease agreement with Joe, he blackmails them into selling them. Robert feels he has no choice, Aaron feels they need to fight.

Cain, meanwhile, is trying to get a Dingle farm up and running to distract himself from all that he’s lost and losing. But it’s falling at the first hurdle with Sam (James Hooton) struggling with this new task and Mackenzie (Lawrence Robb) and Matty (Ash Palmisciano) having to step in to help.

Advertisement

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web
browser that
supports HTML5
video

Cain Dingle and Joe Tate in Butler's Farm kitchen in Emmerdale
Joe continues taking pleasure in giving Cain bad news (Picture: ITV)

Cain then learns that Joe wants to sell the cows and is furious, especially when Mackenzie reasons that they can’t afford to keep the cows themselves. The nail in the coffin for Cain comes when Sam reveals he missed a meeting about the farm machinery, and Cain jumps straight to catastrophising that everything is over.

But there’s hope for Cain in the form of a hooded figure who wants to do their bit to save the family.

Advertisement

Robert and Aaron are shocked when a panicked Matty arrives to reveal that their herd has disappeared in the night. Joe furiously points the finger at Robert, who denies any involvement. Joe knows who to confront and grabs his wingman Graham Foster (Andrew Scarborough) to challenge the Dingles.

The Dingles are smug in responding that they had nothing to do with the theft, not realising that one of them did.

Graham and Joe standing in Wishing Well in Emmerdale
Graham and Joe go in search of the culprit (Picture: ITV)

The culprit is seen out on a country road rustling the cows, and it’s none other than Belle Dingle (Eden Taylor-Draper), who fancies herself as a bit of a cow rustler.

She’s played a blinder in saving the herd, but being a novice, she’s forgotten one major detail – Cain rings her to warn that the bull she’s nicked has been fitted with a tracker.

Joe and the police are closing in, how will the Dingles protect Belle?

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

All the countries with nuclear weapons – and how many – in 2026 amid ongoing wars

Published

on

Daily Record

Which countries possess nuclear weapons in 2026 – and exactly what is in their stockpiles? Read on for the complete list.

As tensions in the Middle East between the US-Israel alliance and Iran escalate daily, the genuine possibility of nuclear conflict weighs heavily on people’s minds.

Advertisement

Other ongoing conflicts including the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Hamas confrontation, and military hostilities between Pakistan and Afghanistan create a volatile mix of dangerous military operations between nations where at least one side possesses nuclear capabilities.

In an era where knowledge is crucial, staying abreast of current developments is essential. So, for those wondering which nations possess exactly what nuclear arsenal, we’ve compiled the complete breakdown for you, reports the Express.

Countries possessing nuclear weapons in 2026

Russia

Advertisement

United States

China

France

United Kingdom

Advertisement

Pakistan

India

Israel

North Korea

Advertisement

What nuclear arsenal do these 9 nations hold

These nine nuclear-armed states possess an estimated 12,300 warheads collectively as of early 2026, with over 9,614 held in operational military stockpiles for deployment via missiles, ships, aircraft, and submarines according to the Federation of American Scientists’ (FAS) 2025 Status of World Nuclear Forces.

The remaining warheads have been decommissioned but remain largely intact whilst awaiting dismantlement. According to the Federation of American Scientists: “Of the 9,614 warheads in the military stockpiles, some 3,912 are deployed with operational forces (on missiles or bomber bases). Of those, approximately 2,100 US, Russian, British, and French warheads are on high alert, ready for use on short notice.”

This overall figure of 12,241 warheads represents a substantial decrease from the roughly 70,000 warheads held by nuclear-armed nations during the Cold War. However, the total is anticipated to increase steadily throughout the coming decade, with modern weapons being far more advanced than their Cold War predecessors.

Which country possesses exactly what

The precise number of nuclear weapons held by individual nations remains a tightly-guarded state secret, meaning these estimates carry “significant uncertainty” according to the FAS. These figures are also thought to have been compiled before the escalation of tensions involving the US-Israel and Iran conflict.

That said, Russia is believed to possess around 5,459 nuclear warheads, with 1,150 classified as retired – meaning they’ve been removed from the military stockpile but remain intact whilst awaiting dismantlement.

A further 2,591 nuclear warheads sit within the Kremlin’s military stockpile, indicating they’re earmarked for potential military deployment, whilst 1,718 are already strategically positioned – bringing the active nuclear arsenal total to 4,309.

The United States, on the other hand, maintains a total active arsenal of 3,700 nuclear warheads, with 1,670 strategically deployed, 100 non-strategically deployed, and 1,930 held in the military stockpile for potential deployment.

Advertisement

The US additionally holds 1,477 retired nuclear warheads – bringing their total nuclear warheads to 5,177. American nuclear weapons are stationed in five other countries – Turkey, Italy, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands – as well as on home soil.

Combined, Russia and the United States hold an estimated 87% of the world’s entire inventory of nuclear weapons as of early 2026, and 83% of the stockpiled warheads available for military deployment.

No other nuclear-armed nations apart from Russia and the US currently deem it necessary to maintain more than a few hundred nuclear weapons for their national defence, though many are developing their nuclear capabilities and gradually expanding their arsenals.

China’s overall nuclear inventory is thought to total 600, comprising 576 warheads in reserve stockpile and 24 strategically deployed. It should be noted that most of the nine nuclear-armed nations offer little or no transparency regarding the true scale of their nuclear stockpiles.

France is believed to maintain an active stockpile of around 300 nuclear warheads as of 2026, with 280 strategically deployed, 10 held in reserve and 80 retired, bringing the overall estimated total to 370.

The United Kingdom is thought to possess a total nuclear arsenal of 225 warheads, of which 120 are strategically deployed whilst 105 remain in the reserve stockpile for potential military deployment.

India, Pakistan and Israel never signed up to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), whose aim is stated as: “Prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament.”

Advertisement

North Korea, however, initially became a signatory to the NPT as a non-nuclear weapon state, before announcing its withdrawal from the treaty in 2003.

India is estimated to possess roughly 180 nuclear warheads, Pakistan holds 170, and North Korea has approximately 50. These figures are based on the quantity of fissile material – highly enriched plutonium and uranium – that each of these nuclear-armed nations is estimated to have produced.

The precise warhead totals for Israel and North Korea remain unconfirmed, though it is believed North Korea holds sufficient fissile material to construct at least “40-50 individual weapons”, whilst Israel has the “nuclear material for up to 200”.

According to the Arms Control Association: “North Korea likely possesses additional fissile material that is not weaponized, but there is a high degree of uncertainty surrounding these estimates.

Advertisement

“North Korea has uranium enrichment technology and a known uranium enrichment facility at Yongbyon. It likely operates additional covert uranium enrichment facilities at other locations.

North Korea has developed nuclear capable missiles of various ranges, including ICBMs (intercontinental ballistic missiles), and claims to have developed tactical nuclear warheads.”

While the worldwide stockpile of nuclear weapons is gradually decreasing, the rate of those reductions has slowed considerably compared to the past three decades.

French President Emmanuel Macron recently declared that his country would be expanding its nuclear arsenal, stating: “The next 50 years will be an era of nuclear weapons.” Macron also revealed the launch of France’s new nuclear-armed submarine in 2036, named The Invincible.

Advertisement

The total number of warheads held in global military stockpiles is rising, with China, North Korea, India, Pakistan, France, the United Kingdom, and quite possibly Russia, all thought to be steadily bolstering their existing arsenals.

The USA has rapidly depleted its nuclear weapons stockpile in its current war with Iran, including Tomahawk missiles, and it remains to be seen whether it adds more to its existing inventory.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Sean Penn receives ‘Oscar’ in Ukraine after skipping US ceremony

Published

on

Sean Penn receives 'Oscar' in Ukraine after skipping US ceremony

US actor Sean Penn has been gifted an Oscar-shaped award made from war-damaged rail metal by Ukraine, after he skipped Sunday’s ceremony to visit the war-torn country.

Penn, 65, won his third Academy Award for his supporting actor role in political thriller One Battle Another but was absent from the ceremony.

In a video posted by Oleksandr Pertsovskyi, the CEO of Ukrainian Railways, Pertsovskyi tells Penn: “You’re missing Oscars… So we made this one. This is from the railcar that was damaged by the Russians”.

A long-time advocate for Ukraine, Penn has visited several times since the Kremlin launched its full-scale invasion of the country four years ago.

Advertisement

He gifted one of his Oscars to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in 2022.

More on this story.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

How to drive Route 66: Stops, motels and detours that make the trip unforgettable

Published

on

How to drive Route 66: Stops, motels and detours that make the trip unforgettable

Route 66 is the quintessential American road trip — a 2,500-mile odyssey across eight states from Chicago to Santa Monica.

And with 2026 being the route’s 100th birthday, this year is the perfect time to discover what is now a cultural icon.

Here, we reveal how to do it well, with a guide that steers you towards an authentic Route 66 experience.

We explain how the road acquired legendary status, the diner in Chicago you should have breakfast at before setting off and the dangers of over-reliance on Google Maps for the journey.

Advertisement

Route 66 isn’t a race, and in the following section, we break down how much time to allow for the journey.

From there, it’s the not-to-be-missed sights that help make the trip so wonderfully eccentric, and some of the best motels to book into for a “good old days” vibe.

The finish comes at Santa Monica Pier, where there are a handful of rituals to undertake to mark the end of a road trip of a lifetime.

The birth of a legend

Advertisement
Route 66’s legendary status is partly thanks to the great American novelist John Steinbeck describing it as the ‘Mother Road’

Route 66’s legendary status is partly thanks to the great American novelist John Steinbeck describing it as the ‘Mother Road’ (Getty Images)

Route 66 was commissioned in 1926 and by the time it was finished and fully paved in the late 1930s, it stretched 2,448 miles across Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, from Chicago to Santa Monica — and it quickly attained legendary status, despite not even being the first long-distance highway, or the busiest.

The route’s journey to cultural icon began with hundreds of thousands of farmers from Oklahoma, Texas, Arkansas and Missouri using it to reach California in search of work, a plight immortalized in the great John Steinbeck’s powerful 1939 novel The Grapes of Wrath, in which he dubs Route 66 the “Mother Road.”

When car ownership exploded after the Second World War, Americans discovered en masse that this road of opportunity was also a journey of adventure that took them through bewitching desert landscapes and past neon-lit motels and diners that would come to symbolize classic road trip culture.

Advertisement

By the time the road was decommissioned in 1985 and replaced by the Interstate Highway System, it was ingrained in popular culture, featuring in songs such as Bobby Troup’s (Get Your Kicks on) Route 66, recorded by artists from Nat King Cole to the Rolling Stones, and making appearances in countless road trip movies.

Ironically, its death made it even more famous, with preservation movements emerging to maintain and restore motels, diners and roadside attractions that were now bypassed — today Route 66 is a patchwork of historic sections.

Read more: How much of Route 66 remains after a century?

Start in Chicago — the traditional beginning

Advertisement
For many, the Route 66 road trip begins in Chicago with breakfast at Lou Mitchell's restaurant and bakery on W. Jackson Boulevard, located near the official start of the route on Adam Street, close to the Art Institute of Chicago

For many, the Route 66 road trip begins in Chicago with breakfast at Lou Mitchell’s restaurant and bakery on W. Jackson Boulevard, located near the official start of the route on Adam Street, close to the Art Institute of Chicago (Getty Images)

Chicago is the traditional launchpad — it’s the historic gateway to the west, and you’ll mostly have the sun behind you — and the ceremonial starting point is amid the skyscrapers of the Windy City’s downtown district, on Adams Street, near the Art Institute of Chicago.

There, you’ll find a modest brown-and-white “Begin Route 66” sign. However, before you drive past it, tradition dictates that you head to nearby Lou Mitchell’s restaurant and bakery on W. Jackson Boulevard, which has been serving breakfast to westbound road-trippers since 1923.

The menu is classic diner fare, from coffee and pancakes to omelets and corned beef hash. And while you wait for a table, the serving staff hand out complimentary donut holes and Milk Duds.

Advertisement

Once you set off, you’ll find yourself in another world in little more than an hour.

Great place to stay: Silversmith Hotel Chicago Downtown is just a three minute walk from the Route 66 and features rooms with mini-refrigerators, coffee makers and wifi.

Read more: Why your next city break should be to Chicago

Route planning (beware of Google Maps)

Advertisement
The original Route 66 passes through the former gold mining town of Oatman in Arizona. You’ll be led to fascinating spots like this by following the ‘Historic Route 66’ signs

The original Route 66 passes through the former gold mining town of Oatman in Arizona. You’ll be led to fascinating spots like this by following the ‘Historic Route 66’ signs (Getty Images)

Navigation-wise, it would be tempting to type “Route 66” into Google Maps and take it from there.

But that would be a major mistake. It’s worth laboring the point that Route 66 is no longer one long continuous highway, but a mishmash of surviving segments jammed in among newer highways. Some original sections are quite long and scenic, others last for just a few miles before disappearing (and sometimes making a comeback a bit further along).

Ask Google Maps for the route and you’ll likely end up driving along interstates 40, 44 and 55, which replaced large sections of Route 66, and miss some of the most fascinating roadside attractions.

Advertisement

The key is to follow the “Historic Route 66” signs, which will lead you to some of the most compelling sights and scenery.

Read more: Five under-the-radar road trips that get to the heart of America

How long you should allow for Route 66

The Parks in the Pines General Store and Deli stands along a quiet stretch of Route 66 between Williams and Flagstaff, its vintage 76 sign and weathered red storefront preserving the classic character of mid-century roadside travel in Northern Arizona

Advertisement
The Parks in the Pines General Store and Deli stands along a quiet stretch of Route 66 between Williams and Flagstaff, its vintage 76 sign and weathered red storefront preserving the classic character of mid-century roadside travel in Northern Arizona (Getty Images)

Ideal: 14 days

Today, Route 66 isn’t a means to an economic end — it’s the main attraction, and driving at your leisure will mean you can fully savor its delights. The Goldilocks time frame? Two weeks, or 150-200 miles a day, if you’re committed to the entire Route 66 Chicago-Santa Monica pilgrimage.

A longer journey means ample time to explore roadside attractions, enjoy vintage motels, and have an extra round of pancakes at a classic diner.

Fair: 10 days

Advertisement

Ten days is a relatively popular timeframe, meaning a pace of around 240 miles a day.

However, some sightseeing will need to be sacrificed. One strategy could be to pick up the pace in the eastern section, then slow down and zero in on the more dramatic scenery offered by New Mexico, Arizona and California in the west.

Doable, but rushed: Seven days

A seven-day trip would mean a slow-fast-slow approach, with sections of interstate used to link the most compelling sights. Stops would need to be picked fairly carefully in advance.

Advertisement

Avoid: Four days or less

Shrinking the journey time to four days or less would reduce the drive to a grueling interstate highway marathon. If simply reaching the finish line is the objective, then note that the drive time is about 40 hours.

Read more: I drove in the US for the first time – here’s what shocked me on the 4,000-mile trip

Not-to-be-missed sights

Advertisement
Cadillac Ranch, created in 1974 by the art group Ant Farm, features 10 classic Cadillacs buried nose-first in the ground. It’s a Route 66 must-visit

Cadillac Ranch, created in 1974 by the art group Ant Farm, features 10 classic Cadillacs buried nose-first in the ground. It’s a Route 66 must-visit (cadillac ranch texas)

Route 66’s irresistibly eccentric roadside culture doesn’t take long to emerge after leaving Chicago.

Around 90 minutes away is the town of Wilmington, home to the Gemini Giant, a 30-foot fiberglass astronaut holding a rocket, a variation of the “Muffler Man” figures used to advertise roadside businesses across America.

In the small town of Dwight, around 75 miles from Chicago is the beautifully preserved house-and-canopy-style Ambler’s Texaco Gas Station, which dates back to the 1930s.

Advertisement

Cadillac Ranch, just west of Amarillo in Texas, is mandatory. Created in 1974 by the art group Ant Farm, it features 10 classic Cadillacs buried nose-first in the ground at the same angle as the Great Pyramid of Giza. They’re covered in graffiti, and visitors are encouraged to leave their own spray-painted mark.

In Oklahoma, there’s the cheerful Blue Whale of Catoosa, an 80-foot-long bright blue concrete cetacean with a winning smile; and in Arizona you can pull up in the ghost town of Oatman, where burros wander the streets and “gunmen” stage Wild West shootouts.

Read more: Adventure vacation activities in America to test your fitness (and bravery)

Stay in a motel, not a chain

Advertisement
Blue Swallow Motel, Tucumcari, New Mexico still retains a 1940s atmosphere, including a neon sign advertising ‘100% refrigerated air’

Blue Swallow Motel, Tucumcari, New Mexico still retains a 1940s atmosphere, including a neon sign advertising ‘100% refrigerated air’ (Getty Images)

Skip the chains and book into independent motels to be rewarded with a much more authentic Route 66 experience. Family run motels sprung up in huge numbers during the road trip boom of the 1940s and 1950s and there are still a few beautifully preserved examples you can stay in for a taste of the “good old days.” Here are three of the most celebrated options:

Blue Swallow Motel, Tucumcari, New Mexico

The Blue Swallow Motel has been giving Mother Road travelers a comfortable place to rest since 1939, and its yesteryear charms have been beautifully preserved: the neon sign advertising “100% refrigerated air” still glows above it and the rooms contain 1940s-era rotary dial phones and vintage lamps. Rooms from $120.

Advertisement

Wigwam Motel, Holbrook, Arizona

Guests have been staying in the Wigwam Motel’s distinctive concrete teepees since the 1950s — and while the 15 units include mod cons such as wifi and satellite TV, the original handmade hickory furniture has been retained. Rooms from $105.

Boots Court Motel, Carthage, Missouri

When Boots Court Motel opened in 1939, guests paid $2.50 to stay in one of eight rooms completed in the “streamline moderne” architectural style. Each room came with a carport and the property proudly advertised a “radio in every room.” Today, there are 13 renovated rooms for Route 66-ers to stay in and a visitors center housed in the former gas station. Rooms from $79.

Advertisement

Read more: Six epic rides coming to US theme parks in 2026 — including the fastest-ever dive coaster

Finish at the Santa Monica Pier

At Santa Monica Pier there is a sign marking the end of Route 66

At Santa Monica Pier there is a sign marking the end of Route 66 (Getty Images)

Eight states and nearly 2,500 miles of tarmac later, you’ll arrive at Santa Monica Pier where you’ll find a sign that simply says “End of the Trail.”

Advertisement

It’s not the most celebratory piece of signage, but the exuberant surroundings, from street performers to the pier’s amusement park, make the occasion a fittingly jubilant one.

A popular ritual among road trippers is to take a selfie at the sign, then walk to the end of the pier and look back, inland, at the land mass that’s been tamed, before a dip of the toes in the Pacific Ocean.

Great place to stay: The Shore Hotel (rooms from $235) is directly across the road from the pier and offers rooms with balconies overlooking the beach.

Good to know: Parking around the pier is congested, and while there is a parking deck beneath the pier, it’s recommended to leave your car at the hotel and walk to the finish line.

Advertisement

Read more: A sober guide to Napa Valley

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Ilkley-based duo launching craft caf in Skipton town centre

Published

on

Ilkley-based duo launching craft caf in Skipton town centre

Craft Social will launch at 24a Newmarket Street in Skipton on March 28.

Founded by Ilkley-based creatives Sophie and Becky, the café aims to encourage slow living, creativity, and screen-free connection through hands-on activities.

The pair said: “After seeing the joy our mobile workshops brought to people over the past year, opening Craft Social as a permanent space felt like the natural next step.

Craft Social, a new craft café founded by Ilkley-based creatives Sophie and Becky, will open on March 28 at 24a Newmarket Street in Skipton, North Yorkshire. (Image: Supplied)

“We wanted to create a calm, welcoming space where people can step away from busy life, get creative and leave feeling proud of what they’ve made.”

Advertisement

With backgrounds in illustration and design, the founders first launched Craft Social as a mobile craft workshop in 2024, running private creative events across Yorkshire.

Buoyed by a successful first year, they decided to create a permanent, community-focused venue.

The café will be screen-free, encouraging visitors to unplug and engage fully with hands-on creative activities.

Standard bookings and walk-ins are welcome, with visitors able to take part in crafts such as painting, beading, and spray painting.

Advertisement

Craft Social will also host regular in-house workshops, starting at £10 per person, and is available for private hire for special occasions from £15 per person.

Guests can also purchase pre-prepared craft kits from £5, designed for use at home and ideal for gifting.

The space will showcase work by local artists and offer them the opportunity to hire the venue and host their own events.

The founders hope the café will become a creative hub for the community.

Advertisement

Visitors will be able to enjoy baked treats and drinks from nearby suppliers as part of the café’s commitment to supporting local businesses.

A launch event will take place on March 28 from 1pm to 4pm, inviting the community to explore the refurbished space, enjoy complimentary drinks, and take part in creative activities.

The café will officially open on April 1 and will operate Wednesday to Saturday from 9.30am to 4pm.

Bookings and enquiries can be made via email at craftsocialyorkshire@gmail.com. More information is available at www.craftsocialyorkshire.com.

Advertisement

The café’s social media handle is @craftsocialyorkshire.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Three things we learned from Arsenal FC win as Eberechi Eze offers X-factor

Published

on

Three things we learned from Arsenal FC win as Eberechi Eze offers X-factor

On and on Arsenal go in all four competitions.

If Arsenal beat Manchester City in the Carabao Cup final at Wembley on Sunday, expect the quadruple talk to be in overdrive by the time those two fixtures come around.

With the attack as fluent here as it has been in weeks and the defence typically secure, Arsenal have all the answers right now.

Mikel Arteta enjoys ideal night

Advertisement

Short of a 7-0 rout and the result wrapped up inside 20 minutes, this was close to a perfect night for Mikel Arteta.

Earlier in the evening, Sporting mounted a comeback against Bodo/Glimt to ensure there would be no quarter-final trip to the Arctic Circle and artificial surface to contend with.

Arteta, meanwhile, was able to make four changes with just over 20 minutes to go, shuffling his pack to suggest he had one eye on that Wembley clash.

Eze was taken off and so too Martin Zubimendi, with Christian Norgaard brought on for some rare minutes. Kai Havertz also got some game time as he looks to get up to full speed again.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Dozens of ships slip through the Strait of Hormuz as Iran’s oil exports get through

Published

on

Dozens of ships slip through the Strait of Hormuz as Iran's oil exports get through

HONG KONG (AP) — About 90 ships including oil tankers have crossed the Strait of Hormuz since the outset of the war with Iran and it is still exporting millions of barrels of oil at a time when the waterway has been effectively closed, according to maritime and trade data platforms.

Many of the vessels that passed through the strait were so-called “dark” transits evading Western government sanctions and oversight that likely have ties to Iran, maritime data firm Lloyd’s List Intelligence said. More recently, vessels with ties to India and Pakistan have also successfully crossed the strait as governments stepped up negotiations.

As crude prices spiked above $100 a barrel, U.S. President Donald Trump pressured allies and trade partners to send warships and reopen the strait, hoping to bring oil prices lower.

Most shipping traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway for global oil and gas transport that supplies roughly one-fifth of the world’s crude oil, has been halted since early March, after the war started. About 20 vessels have been attacked in the area.

Advertisement

However, Iran has still managed to export well above 16 million barrels of oil since the beginning of March, trade data and analytics platform Kpler estimated. Due to Western sanctions and associated risks, China has been the biggest buyer of Iranian oil.

There has been ”continued resilience” in Iran’s oil export volumes, said Kpler trade risk analyst Ana Subasic.

Iran has managed to profit from oil sales and also “preserve its own export artery” by using control over the chokepoint, said Kun Cao, client director at consulting firm Reddal.

Iran’s oil export data estimates are largely aligned with maritime traffic data.

Advertisement

At least 89 ships crossed the Strait of Hormuz between March 1 and 15 – including 16 oil tankers, according to Lloyd’s List Intelligence, down from roughly 100 to 135 vessel passages per day before the war. More than one-fifth of the 89 vessels were believed to be Iran-affiliated, while Chinese and Greece affiliated ships are among the rest, it said.

Other vessels also have been getting through.

The Pakistan-flagged crude oil tanker Karachi, controlled by the Pakistan National Shipping Corp., passed through the strait on Sunday, Lloyd’s List Intelligence said.

Shariq Amin, a spokesman at the Pakistan Port Trust, refused to confirm or deny which route the MT Karachi had used but he said the ship would soon safely reach Pakistan.

Advertisement

The India-flagged liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) carriers Shivalik and Nanda Devi, both owned by state-owned Shipping Corp. of India, also traveled through the strait around March 13 or 14, according to Lloyd’s List Intelligence. LPG is used as a primary cooking fuel by millions of Indian households.

India’s foreign minister, Subrahmanyam Jaishankar, told the Financial Times the two vessels’ were able to pass following talks with Iran. Iraq was also in talks with Iran to allow Iraqi oil tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, its state-run news agency reported.

Vessels may be transiting “with at least some level of diplomatic intervention,” said Richard Meade, editor-in-chief of Lloyd’s List. So, Iran may have “effectively created a safe corridor” with some ships passing close to the Iranian coast.

Some vessels near or in the strait were found to have declared themselves as China-linked or with all Chinese crew to reduce risks of being attacked, based on an earlier analysis on ship tracking platform MarineTraffic. Analysts believe they were taking advantage of China’s closer ties with Iran.

Advertisement

Oil prices have jumped more than 40% to above $100 per barrel since the Iran war began, and Iran has threatened it won’t allow “even a single liter of oil” destined for the U.S., and Israel and their allies to pass through.

To try to stabilize oil prices, the U.S. said it was allowing Iranian oil tankers to cross the strait. “The Iranian ships have been getting out already, and we’ve let that happen to supply the rest of the world,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with CNBC on Monday.

The U.S. bombed military sites on Kharg Island off the Iranian coast, which is key for Iran’s oil network and exports, but President Donald Trump said he had left its oil infrastructure alone for now.

The latest passages through the Strait of Hormuz show the strait was not simply “closed,” Cao said. “It is better understood as closed selectively against some traffic, while still functioning for Iranian exports and a narrow set of tolerated non-Iranian movements,” he said.

Advertisement

However, if Iran’s plan is to “inflict pain through higher energy prices, the number of tankers it allows through the Strait of Hormuz may be very limited,” Dutch bank ING’s strategists Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey wrote in a research note.

___

Saaliq reported from New Delhi. AP Writer Munir Ahmed contributed from Islamabad, Pakistan.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025