Abusers use counter-allegations to deflect blame onto their victims and deter them from seeking help in the future (Picture: Maria Korneeva/Moment/Getty)
When the police arrived, Michelle thought her ordeal was finally over.
She sat shellshocked on the sofa, squinting through a black eye with blood seeping from a cut lip after the latest violent assault at the hands of her abusive partner.
But it was Michelle who ended up in a cell that night after he told officers she hit him first.
Her ex had used the counter-allegation tactic.
Advertisement
It’s one that perpetrators often employ, according to Nadia Hughes, head of criminal justice services at Advance, a charity that helps women who’ve experienced harm through domestic abuse and the criminal justice system.
The ploy is particularly effective when a woman has acted in self-defence or retaliated, so the perpetrator himself has injuries. These are then misunderstood by the police as signs of aggression, rather than the culmination of years of abuse.
Nadia says that besides deflecting the blame from the abuser, the tactic also serves another purpose: ‘It’s a really manipulative way to deter a survivor from calling 999 in the future’.
Once the counter-allegation strategy has been used once, the police have a record that this woman might be violent or abusive. Nadia explains that ‘she’s then less likely to report the abuse she’s been subjected to because there is a distrust of statutory services like the police’.
Advertisement
‘Counter allegations actually become a sort of weaponised way of controlling that survivor. It is something we hear a lot unfortunately.’
Around half of recent referrals to Advance, which works at the intersection of domestic abuse and criminal justice, have stemmed from women being arrested as a result of counter allegations.
Research shows that women are three times more likely to be arrested than their male partners at a domestic abuse incident involving them.
This Is Not Right
On November 25, 2024 Metro launched This Is Not Right, a campaign to address the relentless epidemic of violence against women.
Advertisement
With the help of our partners at Women’s Aid, This Is Not Right aims to shine a light on the sheer scale of this national emergency.
You can find more articles here, and if you want to share your story with us, you can send us an email at vaw@metro.co.uk.
Read more:
Advertisement
Michelle tells Metro she suffered years of abuse prior to her wrongful arrest, beginning when she was pregnant.
‘The second time he hit me was after my son was born and he was in my arms,’ she says. ‘That was horrific.
‘My son had a white baby grow on and there was blood all over him where he broke my nose.’
Advertisement
Michelle suffered appalling injuries, including a broken leg and fractured collarbone, when her ex pushed her from a fourth-floor window.
‘When you’re in it you don’t see how serious it is,’ she says. ‘You just know that you survived it.’
She describes how her homelife hinged on her ex’s moods.
Around half of recent referrals to Advance have stemmed from women being arrested as a result of counter allegations (Picture: Getty Images/Johner RF)
‘He would phone me during the day and let me know how good or bad his day was going,’ she says.
‘That would determine what my evening was going to be like. If it was a bad day, I would be walking on eggshells waiting for him to flip at me.
Advertisement
‘It’s like dying a slow death waiting for that snap to happen.’
Looking back, Michelle can’t even remember what that final argument was about.
When her ex started hitting her again, she instinctively threw her arms up to try and defend herself.
But she caught his face with her elbow while doing so, giving him a bloodied nose.
Advertisement
Despite being the one who called the police, she found herself being arrested alongside him.
She lost her job as a family support worker after missing a key court hearing while in custody.
‘I sent myself to university when I was 30 trying to better my life,’ Michelle says. ‘I got the job of my dreams, and it was taken.’
Research shows that women are three times more likely to be arrested than their male partners at a domestic abuse incident involving them (Picture: Getty)
Beyond the physical and emotional toll, counter allegations can cost women their homes, their children and their jobs.
In the case of Bethany Rae Fields, her killer used counter allegations in the lead up to, and on the day he killed her.
Advertisement
After 21-year-old Bethany reported her ex Paul Crowther to the police following threats he had made against her, her friends and family, Paul turned his finger at her multiple times.
Pauline, Bethany’s mum, calls his actions ‘despicable. She was tiny; 21 to his 35 years.’
Staffing issues meant that Paul’s complaint progressed slowly – as did Bethany’s against him – and a week after filing his ‘case’ with the police, he chased it, and then again four days later.
Despite Paul being reported to the police seven times, despite being known to services after having had two former partners complain about harassment – with one resulting in a conviction, and despite Paul telling mental health services that he wanted to take revenge against Bethany, he was still invited to make a statement after reporting her to the police.
Advertisement
He went into the station on September 12, 2019, to make a statement against her. That same day he killed her.
Pauline now urges police to think of Bethany’s initials – BRF – and to ‘Believe. React. Fast’. That means considering whether the counter-allegation tactic is in play.
For Jessica, the experience of being disbelieved by the police has eroded her faith in the force completely.
‘I don’t believe they have listened to me once, or made me feel safe,’ she tells Metro.
Advertisement
Jessica was abused for years by two of her children and ended up having to leave the family home after being arrested and charged when one of them claimed she was the perpetrator.
She says her son would hold a knife to her throat and her daughter would kick and spit at her.
‘It got to the point where I couldn’t go to the rest of the house really. I was living in a bedroom. It was marked cell number five with my name.’
Jessica adds: ‘I don’t think I could even admit to myself how bad it was until now, when I look at the pictures of the injuries and the pictures of my bedroom door – I thought that was normal.
Advertisement
On the day of her arrest, Jessica says her daughter ‘started on’ her again as she was going into her bedroom.
Like Michelle, she put her hand out to signal she’d had enough – but that was not how it was subsequently reported to the police: ‘Apparently that was attempting to push her down the stairs.’
‘We are finding that women are not speaking up – they are not feeling confident or safe to report.’
Jessica is still haunted by the traumatic experience of being arrested.
Advertisement
‘I was in the bedroom with my other daughter,’ she recalls. ‘We were just laying there. There was a bang on the door.
‘My bedroom door regularly banged from the children anyway, but as I went to open it, I was literally pulled out by force onto the little landing.
‘I didn’t have a clue what was happening – there was no reason for the police to be there. I was put in handcuffs.
‘I was crying, and the two children that did this were sat there filming the whole thing and laughing.
Advertisement
‘It was so daunting, and the way they treat you when you’re going to the cells is just horrendous. I’d never been in one before.’
Jessica adds: ‘Everyone always joked and called me Wonder Woman because I had six children. I was a nursery manager. I was a trusted person.
‘They’ve taken all of that away.’
She spent a year under investigation only for the common assault charge to be dropped at the crown court.
Advertisement
Being made to feel like a criminal has now changed how she views the police.
Learn more about Advance
Advance is a charity that helps women who’ve experienced harm through domestic abuse and the criminal justice system.
They deliver wraparound frontline services across the South and East of England, including Greater London.
You can find out more about the charity here; and if you need help now, you can find the relevant contact details here.
Advertisement
‘They just don’t seem to understand domestic abuse. They definitely don’t understand child-to-parent violence.’
In addition to being less likely to call the police, a woman subject to counter allegations is also less likely to be referred by them on to specialist support because she is seen as a perpetrator.
Advertisement
Nadia says: ‘If you’ve got perpetrators who are recording a woman using resistance – someone who has been subjected to abuse for a long period of time and gets to the point where she retaliates as a response to that – that becomes an isolated incident away from the long-term abuse and can be used as evidence against her.
‘We are finding that women are not speaking up – they are not feeling confident or safe to report.’
Research shows nearly 70% of women in prison or under community supervision are victims of domestic abuse. For many, that is directly linked to their offending and can take the form of counter allegations, coerced offending or criminalisation by association.
‘I’ve seen quite a number of cases where very coercively controlling men – very manipulative men – are able to set these situations up. It can all be quite Machiavellian and horrendous.’
Advertisement
The Centre for Women’s Justice is campaigning for a new defence in criminal law that will recognise coercive control as the driver of the offence.
Currently, victims can only rely on the defence of duress – when you are coerced into acting under the use or threat of violence – which has been found to be ineffective in cases of domestic abuse.
Instead, they often depend on the police or Crown Prosecution Service deciding it is not in the public interest to prosecute them.
Harriet Wistrich, founder and CEO of the Centre for Women’s Justice, tells Metro: ‘In a lot of domestic abuse situations, by the time the police have arrived the victim could be very traumatised or hysterical and he’s appearing very calm.
Advertisement
‘If he’s saying, “she’s just a bit mentally unwell and she’s just thrown something at me”, how do the police deal with that situation?
‘And we have seen a lot of situations where the woman has been arrested and she’s really the victim and the police aren’t necessarily able to make a very careful assessment of what’s going on.
‘I’ve seen quite a number of cases where very coercively controlling men – very manipulative men – are able to set these situations up.
‘It can all be quite Machiavellian and horrendous.’
Advertisement
She adds: ‘Our proposed model is based on what we have for victims of trafficking, where it’s recognised that if you’re forced to commit criminal offences that essentially you have a defence if you can show that it’s directly linked with your exploitation.
‘What we’re arguing is that where somebody is in a coercively controlling relationship where they are under control of somebody and they are essentially forced to handle stolen goods or drugs or commit mortgage fraud or whatever it is, they can show circumstances which lead them to commit those acts.
‘Obviously, it’s not necessarily having a gun held to you, but if it’s in that context of the relationship then they should have a defence and be able to argue they are not culpable rather than potentially argue it as mitigation but still be convicted of a crime.’
A motorcyclist “lost control” before crashing into a safety barrier along a Cambridgeshire road, an inquest into his death has heard. Emergency services were called to a crash on the A1307 near Swavesey at around 5.10pm on August 29, 2025.
The crash involved a grey Porsche 911 and motorcycle. The motorcyclist, 35-year-old Christopher Millard from Warboys, died after the crash.
Coroner Elizabeth Gray told the court today (Friday, April 17) at Vantage House in Huntingdon, that a post-mortem concluded that Chris died of “multiple traumatic injuries due to a road traffic collision”.
Advertisement
A CT scan revealed that Chris suffered “severe blunt trauma to the head”, as well as fractures including to his spine. A police report read out to the court stated that Chris and the driver of the Porsche were travelling westbound on the A1307 on the day of the crash.
The court heard how Chris’s motorcycle “attempted to overtake” the Porsche, and crashed into the front of the car. Chris then “lost control” and crashed into a safety barrier. Witness statements read out stated that they believe Chris was travelling at around 90mph, with the Porsche travelling at a “slower speed”.
One witness said the Porsche and motorbike were being driven “aggressively”, and when they were travelling next to each other, they were “closer than normal”. The court heard that there were no defects with either the Porsche or motorbike, and the Porsche driver and Chris were “not under the influence”.
In her conclusion, Coroner Gray said that both vehicles were travelling at “high speeds” in the lead up to the crash. However, she said Chris “lost control” of the motorbike before crashing into the barrier, but it was an “unknown reason” why he lost control.
Advertisement
Coroner Gray added that he may have “misjudged” the speed of the Porsche or the distance when overtaking the vehicle. Before the inquest was heard, Chris’s partner shared a few words about the 35-year-old.
She said Chris was a “shadow of a person” when she first met him, but he had “built his life up”. She added that he was “happy” and they had planned to marry. She said: “It’s really sad his life was cut short”.
At the time of the crash, Cambridgeshire Police arrested a 46-year-old man from South Cambridgeshire on suspicion of causing death by dangerous driving. He was then released on bail.
A police spokesperson confirmed that the man arrested had his “bail cancelled” and there was “no further police action” needed.
Theatre should always provoke emotion in an audience but thus far, via various incarnations, the only ones Samuel Beckett’s play has stirred up in me have been confusion, annoyance, apathy and worst of all boredom.
At best I’ve been underwhelmed, at worst left totally baffled as to why it is regularly cited as a classic.
Matthew Kelly as Estragon and George Costigan, Vladimir, in Waiting for Godot (Picture: Mihaela Bodlovic)
So it was with some trepidation that I approached the Octagon.
As the tramps Vladimir and Estragon, George Costigan and Matthew Kelly deliver something of an acting masterclass as two ageing gentlemen of the road awaiting the arrival of the mysterious Godot.
Advertisement
Who he is and what they expect from him is never revealed, but they feel compelled to return to the same spot every day in the hope he will turn up.
Theirs is a bleak existence, it is a life without purpose. So they bicker, they jest, they tease and they insult each other – basically to pass the time.
Matthew Kelly as Estragon and George Costigan, Vladimir, in Waiting for Godot (Picture: Mihaela Bodlovic)
Of the pair, Costigan’s Vladimir is the more optimistic, certainly the more energised. He has a wicked twinkle in his eye at times, dreaming up ways of keeping his road companion amused. But old age has left him with a dodgy prostate and in his quieter moments he’s prone to reflect on the purpose of it all.
Matthew Kelly as Estragon in Waiting for Godot (Picture: Mihaela Bodlovic)
Matthew Kelly’s Estragon is the more world weary. His boots hurt him, he craves sleep and his memory is failing him. He’s the more childlike of the two; a shrunken bear of a man prone to tantrums and also wondering what is the point.
Advertisement
In real life the actors have been friends for years and that closeness adds an extra dimension to their performance. And it’s here the secret to Waiting for Godot lies. These two central characters hold the piece together. It’s their relationship which is essential to the piece.
It was a joy to watch two such accomplished actors go about their craft. Their timing, their physical comedy and their ability to instantly shift from bravado to bewilderment was riveting; a hat swapping scene was worthy of the greats of the silent cinema.
In previous productions I’ve seen, the pair have simply come across as a nihilistic version of the Chuckle Brothers. But in this world bereft of hope, you could sense the love the two characters share for each other. They are both flawed, failing and cast adrift by an uncaring world and unable to cope without one another.
George Costigan, Vladimir, and Matthew Kelly as Estragon with Pozzo played by Gbolahan Obisesan in Waiting for Godot (Picture: Mihaela Bodlovic)
Into the pair’s miserable world comes Pozzo, played by Gbolahan Obisesan. He’s a riot of colour in a monochrome landscape; a loud, swaggering bully of a character dragging his slave Lucky behind him.
Advertisement
Honestly. I still don’t really know what he symbolises or why he’s there; other than to give Vladimir and Estragon something to talk about.
But it’s a very strong performance; his return in the second half having suddenly become blind, perhaps indicating that even the mighty can fall.
Michael Hodgson as Lucky in Waiting for Godot (Picture: Mihaela Bodlovic)
Michael Hodgson as Lucky was genuinely unnerving. A giant rope around his neck leaving painful looking sores, his posture and primeval yelps proved really disturbing. Then his lengthy, surreal monologue, as well as being a real feat of memory, just added to the other worldliness of it all.
The simple stage setting, with some great lighting, helped to build the claustrophobic atmosphere of Vladimir’s and Estragon’s bleak world.
Advertisement
Without wishing to attract the ire of Beckett scholars, I still think there’s an element of Emperor’s New Clothes about the whole thing.
But as far as this production was concerned, it was a privilege to witness the performances of Messrs Corrigan and Kelly. That ladies and gentlemen is how to act, how to hold an audience, how to move an audience – and all in a play in which nothing really happens.
Lefties, part of the Inditex group which owns Zara, Bershka and Stradivarius, will open a flagship store at the Metrocentre later this year.
The store will be one of the brand’s first three in Britain and its only branch in the North East.
Ben Cox, director of the asset managers of Metrocentre, said: “We’re proud to confirm that Lefties are the latest exciting new entrant to commit to Metrocentre.
“As one of the first Lefties stores in the UK, this is another major endorsement of Metrocentre as a key location for international brands investing in UK retail.
Advertisement
“Lefties’ trend-savvy offer will be a compelling addition to our retail mix, and this signing, once again, reflects the dominance and appeal of our scheme to both national and international retailers.
It is a fashion and homeware brand. (Image: LEFTIES)
“With our consistent footfall, extensive catchment, and quality retail offer, we continue to stand out as the leading destination in the region.”
The new store will open in Town Square, where the Red and Green Malls meet.
It will join Metrocentre’s growing list of fashion brands, including Urban Outfitters, Mango, and Hollister, which will open this summer.
Advertisement
Lefties will offer collections for women, men, teens, children, babies, and newborns, along with accessories, footwear, and homeware.
Inditex’s Bershka is also set to open its first North East store at Metrocentre later this year.
Metrocentre reported a 4.8 per cent increase in fashion category sales in the first quarter of 2026 compared to the same period last year.
Womenswear sales rose by 9.2 per cent during the same period.
Gardening expert Michael Griffiths has shared an essential five-minute lavender task do in mid to late spring if the plant is looking untidy or frost-damaged
Angela Patrone Senior Lifestyle Reporter
00:11, 18 Apr 2026
Throughout British gardens, lavender is only beginning to emerge from its winter dormancy, and in numerous outdoor spaces, it still appears far from its summer glory. A touch of careful attention now can make a significant difference when cultivating lavender, enabling the plants to maintain their form and appear purposeful rather than weary or woody once summer comes around.
One task that gardeners ought to undertake with their lavender now is pruning, particularly if they’ve overlooked pruning the plant in late summer last year.
Advertisement
Speaking on his gardening TikTok account @themichaelgriffiths, Michael explained: “If you missed pruning your lavender in late summer, or it’s looking untidy or frost-damaged, now in mid to late spring, when this new growth appears, is the perfect time to prune.”
Lavender ranks as the most under-pruned plant in Britain, with people fearful of cutting into the brown wood. With this concern in mind, Michael has demonstrated the “right way” to prune lavender during this period of the year.
Content cannot be displayed without consent
The gardening expert emphasised one crucial rule to observe when undertaking this job – you can prune lavender as vigorously as you wish, provided you’re not cutting into old wood and you retain some new growth below the cutting point.
Michael observed that it’s straightforward to distinguish between the old wood, which appears brown with almost white foliage, and the new growth, which displays a bright green colour at this time of year.
Advertisement
The gardening expert advised that pruning should be carried out just above the old wood, ensuring that a small amount of the new growth remains intact.
For anyone who mistakenly cuts into the old wood, Michael cautioned that this section “may not regrow” and “you could lose the plant”, so when uncertain, it’s best to stay above the new growth.
It’s important to note that severely pruning your lavender may lead to reduced flowering and a postponed blooming period.
British springs tend to be briefer and cooler, meaning a plant that undergoes hard pruning in April has limited time to recover before the flowering season begins.
Advertisement
As the UK moves into summer, it’s worthwhile deadheading your lavender. Removing the spent flower stalks following the initial flush of blooms in late June will promote a more robust second flowering in late summer.
While not absolutely necessary, as the seed heads have their own appeal if you choose to leave them, for particular varieties it does create a marked improvement to the August display.
As many as six Russian planes were spotted near Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia
Antonio Scancariello and Olivia Bridge Reporter in Live News Network
21:56, 17 Apr 2026
NATO fighter jets were reportedly scrambled after six Russian planes were seen near three Baltic states.
A French crew spotted the supposed threat as Russian jets were seen over the Baltic Sea, near Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia.
Advertisement
French military then shared footage of four NATO Rafale B fighters tracking a Su-30SM fighter alongside a Russian Il-20M electronic intelligence aircraft. Analysts have suggested these aircraft may have been equipped with Kh-31P or Kh-31PM anti-radiation missiles, which is typically used to engage radar and air defence systems.
It is reported the four Rafale B fighters were deployed as part of an “enhanced Air Policing Mission”. The operations were carried out from Šiauliai Air Base in Lithuania, the base where France is heading up NATO’s air policing efforts, The Mirror reported.
During these operations, the French Rafales reportedly used Thales Talios targeting pods.
Although mainly designed for attack missions, these systems possess long-range visual identification capabilities. This allows would be pilots to safely assess potential threats remotely. These operations are part of NATO’s Baltic Air Policing mission, which aims to guarantee the integrity of Baltic airspace.
Advertisement
Earlier today (April 17), there were also reports of a Russian drone breaching the airspace of a NATO country during an overnight bombardment targeting Ukraine. Romania’s Defence Ministry said its air defences identified two targets in the border area of Tulcea county during attacks on Ukrainian civilian infrastructure, one of which entered its airspace.
The ministry said in a statement: “One of the targets entered the airspace of our country, the radar contact with it being lost 16 km southeast of Chilia Veche over an uninhabited area.
We strongly condemn the actions of the Russian Federation that endanger regional security, constituting a serious violation of the norms of international law.”
A team has been sent to investigate the area following the alert, which began just after midnight local time on Friday and ended at 2.48am. Tulcea is directly across the border from the Ukrainian port of Izmail, which has been a target for Russian attacks, and is bordered by the River Danube
In his weekly email to party members, Mr Robinson said people in Northern Ireland are “being squeezed from every direction”.
DUP leader Gavin Robinson has said other parties in the powersharing Executive are “making it worse” for people who are struggling to deal with the cost-of-living crisis.
Advertisement
Mr Robinson accused Sinn Fein, the Alliance and Ulster Unionist parties of “gesture politics” and of backing proposals when the “financial consequences are unresolved”.
In his weekly email to party members, Mr Robinson said people in Northern Ireland are “being squeezed from every direction”.
He added: “Some of those in power are making it worse.”
The powersharing Executive met this week and announced a support package for some households which use home heating oil.
Advertisement
Ministers pledged £19.2 million to go with £17 million already set aside for the scheme from the UK Government.
The scheme will see up to 340,000 lower-income households receiving a £100 payment to go towards their heating oil bills.
Mr Robinson said this was “delivery” from his party colleague, Communities Minister Gordon Lyons.
The DUP leader then referenced the Holiday Hunger Bill, which aims to support children in receipt of free school meals financially during holidays, which passed its second stage at the Northern Ireland Assembly.
Advertisement
He said: “At the Assembly this week, parties backed a proposal to provide free school meal payments over the summer holidays carrying a price tag of over £20 million this year, rising to more than £30 million annually – with no credible answer to one basic question: where does the money come from?”
He added: “Because the answer is uncomfortable. That money comes out of the education budget.
“It means fewer resources in classrooms, reduced support for children with special needs, and cuts to frontline services.
“That is the trade-off, and too many parties simply refuse to say it out loud.”
Advertisement
Mr Robinson said the “same is happening” with support for net zero emissions targets.
He said: “Sinn Féin, Alliance and the Ulster Unionist Party have backed both the summer meals proposals and refused to face up to net zero realities – knowing full well the financial consequences are unresolved.
“They want the headlines, they want the social media clips.
“But when the bills arrive, it will not be their politicians who pay them, it will be the families, farmers and small businesses already struggling to get by.
Advertisement
“That is gesture politics and it has a real cost.”
The DUP leader said if parties wanted to spend more they should “say where the money comes from”.
He said: “If you cannot answer that question, you have no business casting the vote.”
The wiring above the railway at Manchester Piccadilly Station was damaged on Thursday morning (April 16) and engineering teams worked through the night to assess and repair the damage.
Network Rail have said that due to the complexity of the problem, repairs will need to be completed in a block starting Saturday night and running until Sunday morning.
An amended timetable will be in place until 11pm on Saturday night (April 18) and, after then, no trains will run out of Manchester Piccadilly – including platforms 13 and 14.
Advertisement
Instead, an amended timetable will be in place at other central Manchester stations and services in and out of Piccadilly will start again at 11am on Sunday morning (April 19).
Passengers have been urged to check with their train operators before travelling, particularly with big sporting events taking place, including the Manchester Marathon and Manchester City vs Arsenal on Sunday.
Network Rail’s North West route director, Chris Wright, said: “I am sorry to our passengers who have been impacted by the damage to our overhead wires outside Piccadilly.
“The damage was sustained over a large area in a complicated location on the railway. Our engineers have worked tirelessly to fix the issue, and we worked closely with train operators to offer an amended timetable today, which will continue into Saturday.
Advertisement
“We are carrying out a full repair on Saturday night. To do this, we need to close the line into Manchester Piccadilly between 11pm on Saturday and 11am on Sunday. Please, if you are planning to travel into Manchester by rail on Sunday morning, plan your journey in advance and allow extra travel time.”
Simon Turner, Head of Operational Readiness at Avanti West Coast, said: “We’ll be operating a significantly reduced timetable between Manchester Piccadilly and London Euston on Saturday 18 April due to the ongoing issues with the overhead electric wires. These services are expected to be extremely busy, and we strongly advise customers to check before they travel.
“We’re continuing to work with Network Rail and industry partners to help customers get to their destinations via alternative routes. We’d like to thank customers for their patience and remind anyone whose journey is delayed by 15 minutes or more to claim Delay Repay compensation.”
For up-to-date travel information and detail on alternative travel please check ww.nationalrail.co.uk.
Prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty for Tyler Robinson should he be convicted.
Matthew Brown, Associated Press and Gemma Ryder Reporter
22:17, 17 Apr 2026
The man accused of killing Charlie Kirk wants a judge to ban cameras from the courtroom and says live broadcasts of the prosecution are violating his right to a fair trial. Tyler Robinson was back in state court in Utah on Friday as his lawyers asked to delay his May preliminary hearing and pressed their claims that biased coverage is tainting potential jurors in his aggravated murder case.
Among numerous examples cited was a New York Post story they say suggested Robinson confessed to Mr Kirk’s killing during a courtroom conversation on December 11, in his first appearance after being charged. The conversation with his lawyers was inaudible, but the story cited a “lip reading analysis” to support its claim that Robinson said: “I think about the shooting daily.”
“The predominant purpose being served by the live stream coverage has not been the educational reporting of the court proceedings, but rather advertising profit, sensationalism, political agendas, and, most prominently, the vilification of Mr Robinson,” his lawyers wrote in their request to bar cameras. Prosecutors intend to seek the death penalty for Robinson should he be convicted in the September 10 shooting of the conservative activist, who was addressing a crowd of thousands on the Utah Valley University campus in Orem.
Advertisement
Robinson, who turned 23 on Thursday, has not yet entered a plea. A trial date has not been set. Media organisations, prosecutors and Mr Kirk’s widow, Erika Kirk, want the court to allow cameras.
They argue the best way to guard against the misinformation and conspiracy theories that concern Robinson’s defence team is to make the process transparent. Yet livestreaming by media outlets already has tested the patience of Judge Tony Graf.
During the December hearing, Judge Graf temporarily stopped the livestream after it showed the defendant’s shackles in violation of a courtroom decorum order. A January hearing was interrupted when Robinson’s lawyers said close-up shots of Robinson being livestreamed by a local television station could again lead to claims based on lip reading.
Advertisement
That, too, was a violation of Judge Graf’s decorum order. The judge ordered the camera operator not to film Robinson for the remainder of the hearing.
In recent hearings and again on Friday, pool cameras for the media were stationed at the rear of the courtroom, behind Robinson. The judge also made camera operators come before him to acknowledge they understand the rules.
Mike Judd, a lawyer for a coalition of media organisations including The Associated Press fighting to preserve access, said the judge has so far focused on whether his rules inside the courtroom are being followed, not what the media is saying outside court.
Advertisement
“The court can do all of that in order to try to control what gets fed into that media ecosystem,” Mr Judd said. “You reduce the likelihood of somebody publishing things that you think may be of potentially biasing concern later on.”
Advertisement
The preliminary hearing scheduled for May is for prosecutors to show they have enough evidence to proceed to trial. Authorities have said DNA consistent with Robinson’s was found on the trigger of the rifle, the fired cartridge casing, two unfired cartridges and a towel used to wrap the rifle.
But the defence argued on Friday it cannot move forward with the hearing until law enforcement agencies turn over more details about their DNA analysis of evidence.
Prosecutors responded that they have sufficient proof beyond DNA to tie Robinson to Mr Kirk’s killing. That includes surveillance video of Robinson near the university from the morning of the shooting wearing the same clothes as when he turned himself in.
Robinson left a handwritten note for his partner confessing to the crime before it happened, and also confessed to friends on the chatroom platform Discord, prosecutors said.
Rescheduling the preliminary hearing could delay the proceedings six months, Deputy Utah County Attorney Ryan McBride said.
“Justice delayed is justice denied,” he added.
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE
Dog owners are being warned about a major dog law change that could see them hit with unlimited fines
Dog owners are being alerted about a significant legal change that could result in them facing unlimited fines. The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) Act 2025 officially took effect on March 18, 2026, introducing some of the most substantial updates to countryside regulations in decades.
Advertisement
The alert comes as extended daylight hours and milder temperatures encourage more people to venture outdoors for walks. Under the new legislation, which is applicable in England and Wales, the previous £1,000 maximum penalty has been scrapped, meaning courts can now impose unlimited fines on owners whose dogs are discovered to have worried livestock.
Crucially, “livestock worrying” doesn’t simply mean an attack; it encompasses chasing animals or causing them fear or stress, even without any physical injury. Simultaneously, police have been granted enhanced powers to investigate incidents.
Officers can now seize and detain dogs suspected of involvement, enter premises with a warrant and gather evidence, including obtaining DNA samples or mouth impressions to assist in identifying the dog responsible. For numerous owners, it’s a development that feels considerably more severe than previously.
Michael Nelson, from Kennel Store, said: “A lot of people still think this law only applies if a dog actually attacks or injures an animal, but that’s not the case. Even something as simple as chasing livestock can be enough.
“Owners often say their dog is friendly and wouldn’t hurt anything and that might be true in most situations. But around livestock, instinct can take over very quickly, and that’s where problems start.”
Major dog law change means roads and paths now included
One of the most significant changes catching people by surprise is where the law now applies. Previously concentrated on agricultural land, the revised legislation now covers incidents occurring on roads, paths and public rights of way near livestock, not just within fields.
Michael explained: “That’s a big change that hasn’t really cut through yet. You don’t actually have to be walking through a field anymore. If your dog reacts to animals from a nearby path or road, you could still be in trouble.”
Advertisement
The law has also been amended to reflect the genuine impact these incidents can have. Livestock don’t need to be physically injured for an offence to occur; stress alone can cause serious harm, including miscarriage or long-term health issues.
Michael added: “From a distance, it can look harmless, a dog running or barking, but for the animals involved, it’s a completely different story. They can panic, run, and injure themselves very easily.”
He also cautioned that once an incident occurs, the consequences can escalate rapidly: “People don’t always realise how serious it can become. You could be dealing with police involvement, your dog being taken away while it’s investigated and potentially a very significant fine.”
Advertisement
Courts can also order owners to cover the costs associated with seizing and caring for a detained dog, adding to the financial impact.
Michael said: “If you’re anywhere near livestock, the safest thing you can do is keep your dog on a lead. It’s not about whether your dog is well-trained or friendly. It’s about understanding that in the wrong moment, any dog can react.”
The FT Weekend says the PM “digs in” as he faces accusations from Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch of lying to save his job. Elsewhere, the paper reports that oil prices have tumbled after the US and Iran declared the Strait of Hormuz open for shipping. Iran’s foreign minister said the critical waterway would be “completely open” for commercial ships for the remainder of the two-week ceasefire, which ends next Tuesday.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login