Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

NewsBeat

What to know about Trump’s $1.7B fund to compensate allies

Published

on

What to know about Trump’s $1.7B fund to compensate allies

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump ‘s allies who believe they have been wrongly investigated and prosecuted could soon have access to a $1.7 billion dollar compensation fund, the Justice Department announced Monday in a move slammed by Democrats as unconstitutional and corrupt.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a statement that “Anti-Weaponization Fund” will represent “a lawful process for victims of lawfare and weaponization to be heard and seek redress.” Blanche’s statement made no mention of how investigations and prosecutions of Trump’s political opponents under his watch have exposed the Justice Department to the same claims of politicized law enforcement that he has said he opposed.

The fund was announced as part of a deal to resolve Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns.

The fund is in keeping with Trump’s long-running claims that the Justice Department during the Biden administration was weaponized against him, even though then-President Joe Biden himself was scrutinized during that time. The fund would represent not only a highly unorthodox resolution but also a further demonstration of the Trump administration’s eagerness to reward allies who were investigated and in some cases charged and convicted before Trump came to power.

Advertisement

Trump told reporters at the White House on Monday the fund is dedicated to “reimbursing people who were horribly treated.”

Democratic lawmakers who are teeing up a legal challenge to the move argue that it will become a taxpayer-funded “slush fund” for Trump allies and supporters who claim political persecution. They also question whether the president should be able to direct money for the fund without explicit congressional approval.

Here’s what to know about the fund:

Justice Department casts fund as redress for political targeting

The fund was announced after Trump and his sons, Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., and the Trump Organization agreed to drop their lawsuit against the IRS and the Treasury Department. The lawsuit alleged that a leak of confidential tax records caused them reputational and financial harm and negatively affected their public standing, among other allegations.

Advertisement

According to the Justice Department announcement, the fund is meant to provide a formal process for people or entities who say they were unfairly targeted by the government for political, ideological or personal reasons.

“The use of government power to target individuals or entities for improper and unlawful political, personal, or ideological reasons should not be tolerated by any administration,” Justice Department official Trent McCotter said in the statement announcing the fund.

The money itself would come from the federal judgment fund, which pays out court judgments and compromise settlements of lawsuits against the government.

The fund will be able to review claims of alleged government political targeting, will issue formal apologies and award monetary compensation to approved claimants, the Justice Department said.

Advertisement

The claims of a weaponized Justice Department during the Biden administration overlook the fact that President Joe Biden himself was investigated for the potential mishandling of classified information, and his son Hunter was charged with gun and tax crimes.

Justice Department has not said who could qualify for compensation

The Justice Department did not identify anyone by name who could theoretically benefit from the fund, but there were multiple investigations of Trump allies during the Biden administration where targets could look to obtain payouts.

Prosecutors, for instance, charged about 1,500 people in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol. Trump on his first day in office of his second term either pardoned them, commuted their prison sentences or dismissed the cases.

It’s unclear whether those entitled to compensation would include Jan. 6 defendants who were convicted of attacking officers with makeshift weapons such as flagpoles, a hockey stick and crutch. More than 250 people were convicted of assault charges, with the attacks in many cases captured on surveillance or body camera footage.

Advertisement

Asked Monday if individuals who committed violence that day should receive compensation from the fund, Trump said, “It’ll all be dependent on a committee.” He added: “I didn’t do this deal. It was told to me yesterday.”

Other prominent Trump supporters who were investigated and charged include Steve Bannon, who served a prison sentence for defying a congressional subpoena, and Peter Navarro, who was similarly convicted of contempt. Both have denied wrongoing.

Blanche-appointed commission would oversee claims

The Justice Department says the fund will receive $1.776 billion from the federal judgment fund, to operate through Dec. 15, 2028, and will be overseen by a five-member commission appointed by Blanche, with one member chosen in consultation with congressional leadership. According to the Justice Department, the president can remove any member.

It was unclear how the commission would determine who should be awarded compensation.

Advertisement

Critics warn fund could reward Trump loyalists

Democratic lawmakers and ethics watchdogs slammed the creation of the fund, saying it was corrupt, untransparent and had the potential to become a “slush fund” for the president and his allies.

A group of nearly 100 members of Congress filed a brief teeing up a legal challenge to the case.

“This case is nothing but a racket designed to take $1.7 billion of taxpayer dollars out of the Treasury and pour it into a huge slush fund for Trump at DOJ to hand out to his private militia of insurrectionists, rioters, and white supremacists, including those who brutally beat police officers on January 6, 2021, and sycophant accomplices to his election stealing schemes,” Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., called the fund “corruption on steroids.”

Advertisement

Last month, she and a group of other Democratic lawmakers introduced the Ban Presidential Plunder of Taxpayer Funds Act, which would ban the sitting president and vice president from collecting settlement payments from the U.S., among other things.

___

Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer contributed to this report.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Evo Morales’ followers join Bolivia’s largest protests in decades

Published

on

Evo Morales' followers join Bolivia's largest protests in decades

LA PAZ, Bolivia (AP) — Supporters of Bolivia’s influential ex-President Evo Morales clashed with police on Monday in the capital city as they called on the president to resign, joining a nationwide protest movement fueled by the worst economic crisis in a generation.

Thousands of Morales’ followers converged on the plaza outside the government headquarters as Bolivia remains paralyzed by road blockades that have strangled cities and triggered food and fuel shortages in the last two weeks.

The unrest presents the biggest challenge yet for President Rodrigo Paz, a business friendly centrist who came to power six months ago as a wave of conservative electoral wins swept the region.

Security forces pushed back protesters who tried to break police ranks with canisters of tear gas before they could reach Congress or the presidential palace. Dynamite blasts rumbled, forcing staffers and lawmakers to evacuate. “Homeland or death, we will win!” demonstrators chanted, ripping shop doors off their hinges and setting fire to looted sofas used as barricades.

Advertisement

The public prosecutor announced 90 arrests.

“They can march if it’s peaceful, but we will take action if they commit crimes,” said Deputy Interior Minister Hernán Paredes.

A new president’s balancing act

Paz’s shock victory last year highlighted Bolivians’ disillusionment with two decades of political domination by Morales’ Movement Toward Socialism, or MAS, party, as the country reeled from its worst economic crisis in 40 years. But his victory over more right-wing candidates also revealed the nation’s unwillingness to support drastic austerity measures.

As Bolivia’s first elected conservative leader since 2006, Paz has sought to balance belt-tightening with the need to placate Morales’ powerful allies who could disrupt his presidency.

Advertisement

To rein in a massive budget deficit, he eliminated fuel subsidies that represented a pillar of the MAS economic model. But he maintained social welfare programs and offered new benefits to informal workers to blunt the blow of inflation.

That wasn’t enough for many Bolivians. The protest movement began with the national labor union demanding wage hikes. Then farmers furious about poor quality fuel joined. Then miners strapped for dynamite piled on pressure. Now loyalists of Morales want Paz gone.

“Small things have been accumulating — the wage issue, the economic crisis, dirty gasoline that people say is ruining their cars, diesel shortages,” said Veronica Rocha, a Bolivia political analyst. “There’s a huge portion of the population that feels orphaned politically. They don’t trust anyone anymore, and because of that, anything can happen.”

Challenges mount with road blocks

Paz accuses Morales of orchestrating the unrest to undermine his administration. Road blockades have long been a main weapon of social movements tied to Morales that claim to represent Bolivia’s rural Indigenous majority.

Advertisement

Over the past 16 days, the protest tactic has stranded around 5,000 trucks on highways, leaving supermarket shelves empty and hospitals without some medical supplies. Critics say it’s a perverse way to protest economic pain — business chambers report the blockades cause over $50 million in losses a day.

Paz has negotiated with some protest groups, reaching deals in recent days with striking miners and teachers who agreed to end their demonstrations. He deployed thousands of police and military officers across La Paz to try to break the blockades over the weekend.

But the crisis continues, worrying the wider region. Eight allied Latin American governments, from Chile to Costa Rica, released a joint statement rejecting “any action aimed at destabilizing the democratic order.” Neighboring Argentina said it would start a weeklong humanitarian airlift to alleviate shortages in the country.

The United States, now rebuilding relations with Bolivia after years in which Morales defined the country in opposition to Washington, said it supported Paz’s efforts “to restore order for the peace, security and stability of the Bolivian people.” The State Department issued an alert this week urging U.S. citizens traveling to Bolivia to be vigilant.

Advertisement

Morales marshaled the latest march from his hideout in Bolivia’s remote tropics. He has been holed up in the highlands for the past year and a half, evading an arrest warrant on charges relating to his sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl. He says the allegations are politically motivated.

Right-wing politicians have seized on the protests to demand authorities arrest Morales, who was held in contempt of court last week after he failed to appear for a trial.

But Morales’ enduring influence “is only one piece of the puzzle,” Rocha said. “If the government wants to survive politically, it will have to make drastic changes.”

___

Advertisement

DeBre reported from Ushuaia, Argentina.

___

Follow AP’s coverage of Latin America and the Caribbean at https://apnews.com/hub/latin-america

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

San Diego mosque shooting: Everything we know after three killed and two suspects dead

Published

on

San Diego mosque shooting: Everything we know after three killed and two suspects dead

Local police and federal agents are investigating a shooting that took place Monday at an Islamic center in San Diego that left three victims and two suspects dead.

Police were called to the Islamic Center of San Diego, which includes a mosque and K-3 school, just before noon on Monday.

Police said they found three adults dead, including a security guard. No children at the center were harmed in the shooting.

Officers were almost simultaneously called to a scene a few blocks away on reports of gunfire, according to police.

Advertisement

There, they found the two teen suspects, both dead from apparent self-inflicted gunshot wounds.

Police are investigating two teenagers who allegedly killed three people outside a San Diego mosque then died by apparent self-inflicted gunshot wounds
Police are investigating two teenagers who allegedly killed three people outside a San Diego mosque then died by apparent self-inflicted gunshot wounds (AP)

Here’s what we know about the suspects so far:

A pair of teen gunmen

Police described the two suspects as males age 17 and 18.

Officials have not named the suspects and it was not immediately clear if they were local residents or had any personal ties to the San Diego mosque police believe they attempted to attack.

Advertisement

Police have not described what types of weapons were used in the shooting.

Police were reportedly seen outside a home thought to belong to a suspect’s family member
Police were reportedly seen outside a home thought to belong to a suspect’s family member (AP)

The mother of one of the suspects warned police Monday morning that her son had run away, might be suicidal and had taken several of her weapons and her vehicle, according to officials.

She told police her son left with a companion, and that both were dressed in camouflage.

Police were sent to San Diego’s Fashion Valley Mall after license plate readers suggested the individuals were there. Officers also believe one of the two suspects had some kind of tie to San Diego’s Madison High School.

Officers were speaking with the mother when the shooting outside the mosque was reported.

Advertisement

After the attack, investigators were seen outside a home in San Diego thought to belong to a relative of at least one of the individuals, NBC San Diego reports.

Multiple crime scenes

Local police and federal agents from the FBI and ATF are investigating the case, which has a crime scene spread across multiple locations.

The three victims of the shooting were discovered outside the Islamic Center, while the two suspects were found a few blocks away.

Advertisement

By the time police arrived at the Islamic Center, the gunmen had allegedly left. Officers got another call about shots fired at a landscaper nearby and headed to that location.

Federal agents with the FBI and ATF are assisting with the investigation
Federal agents with the FBI and ATF are assisting with the investigation (Reuters)

On the 3800 block of Hatton Street, police said they found the two suspects dead in their vehicle in the middle of the street.

Searching for a motive

Investigators are treating the shooting at the mosque, the largest in San Diego County, as a hate crime.

“Because of the Islamic Center location, we are considering this a hate crime until it’s not,” San Diego Police Chief Scott Wahl told reporters on Monday. “And at this point we’re going to work closely with the FBI to make sure that we are matching all the resources that we need for this investigation.”

Advertisement

Investigators found anti-Islamic writing in the vehicle with the suspects, and the words ‘hate speech’ were written on a weapon used in the attack, law enforcement sources told The New York Times. One of the suspects reportedly left a suicide note that discussed “racial pride,” CNN reports, citing law enforcement sources.

The FBI said it is surging resources to the area and federal officials including FBI Director Kash Patel and President Donald Trump have been briefed.

Police have not publicly named any of the victims or suspects of the shooting
Police have not publicly named any of the victims or suspects of the shooting (Reuters)

Police plan to review security video from the scene of the shooting.

“The FBI is meticulously assessing the situation and is prepared to employ every resource we have to uncover the facts of this incident,” San Diego-based FBI Special Agent in Charge Mark Remily told reporters on Monday. “No community should have to go through such a tragic incident, but we will work tirelessly until we learn the truth.”

Agents are also interviewing family members and friends, Remily said.

Advertisement

The FBI has called on community members to submit any pertinent photo or video evidence to the bureau.

A slain security guard who stopped a tragedy

Police have said little so far about the victims of Monday’s shooting, beside the fact that they were all adults.

Officials credited one of the victims, a security guard, with stopping more deaths from taking place inside the center.

Advertisement

“One of the deceased is a security guard that works there and I think played a pivotal role in assisting from this being much worse,” Chief Wahl said.

If you are based in the USA, and you or someone you know needs mental health assistance right now, call or text 988 or visit 988lifeline.org to access online chat from the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline. This is a free, confidential crisis hotline that is available to everyone 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you are in another country, you can go to www.befrienders.org to find a helpline near you. In the UK, people having mental health crises can contact the Samaritans at 116 123 or jo@samaritans.org

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

M56 traffic LIVE as motorway to stay closed for hours after person airlifted to hospital – updates

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

A person was airlifted to hospital with serious injuries after a horror collision involving a lorry and multiple cars on the M56 on Monday (May 18). Police, fire crews and paramedics, as well as an air ambulance, raced to the scene near Warrington at around 5pm.

The eastbound carriageway was completely closed off and all traffic held in the closure while emergency services responded. Cheshire Police said a HGV and two cars were involved in the crash between junction 10 for Stretton, and junction 9, for the M6 Interchange.

Police said the closure would remain in place for ‘several hours’ into the evening for investigation works to take place. Five causalities in total were treated at the scene by paramedics. One person was cut free from a car involved which had its roof removed.

Advertisement

READ HERE.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

A strong quake in south China kills 2 and triggers evacuation of 7,000

Published

on

A strong quake in south China kills 2 and triggers evacuation of 7,000

A 5.2 magnitude earthquake struck south China’s Guangxi region early Monday, killing two people, toppling buildings and triggering the evacuations of thousands, state media reported.

Four others were injured, while more than 7,000 residents were evacuated from Liuzhou city.

The search for several missing residents wrapped up around midday Monday, after the last trapped person, a 91-year-old man, was found alive in good condition, authorities said.

Images aired by state broadcaster CCTV showed excavators clearing debris. At least 13 buildings collapsed, while landslides triggered by the quake blocked roads to the area, according to CCTV.

Advertisement

Train services around Liuzhou were canceled or delayed.

Earthquakes occasionally strike south China, with more intense ones usually occurring toward the mountainous west or the east, toward Taiwan. The most devastating recent earthquake with a magnitude of 7.9 occurred in the southwestern Sichuan province in 2008, leaving more than 87,000 dead or missing.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

What to know about the collision of 2 Navy jets at an Idaho air show

Published

on

What to know about the collision of 2 Navy jets at an Idaho air show

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — After the two Navy jets collided in midair, the planes sandwiched together, all four crew members were able to eject and deploy their parachutes, floating down to safety as the aircraft careened into a field, exploding into a fireball.

The collision happened Sunday during the “Gunfighter Skies” air show at the Mountain Home Air Force Base some 57 miles (92 kilometers) southwest of Boise.

Here are some things to know about the crash.

Just one crew member was injured

Only one of the four crew members on the two planes was injured and was being treated at a hospital, Cmdr. Amelia Umayam, spokesperson for Naval Air Forces, U.S. Pacific Fleet, said Monday. The injury was not life-threatening.

Advertisement

The fact that all four were able to safely eject and make it down without landing in the wreckage is “truly remarkable,” said Billie Flynn, a former F-35 senior test pilot and demonstration expert.

“It is astonishing considering the way the airplanes impacted each other — incomprehensible even,” Flynn said.

The two U.S. Navy EA18-G Growlers were from the Electronic Attack Squadron 129 in Whidbey Island, Washington. Each held two crew members.

The EA-18G Growler, measuring just over 60 feet (18.5 meters) long, made its first flight in August 2006 and was the first newly designed electronic warfare aircraft produced in more than 35 years, according to the Navy.

Advertisement

The planes appeared sandwiched together before falling

Videos taken by spectators show one of the jets was slightly behind the other before impact, and the two aircraft then appeared to become sandwiched together, with the belly of one jet just behind and to the side of the top of the other jet.

The jets then twisted and rocked together, pointing straight up for a moment before turning downward and diving to the ground. The impact resulted in a fireball and sent black smoke skyward.

The crew members ejected quickly, their parachutes opening just as the jets were pivoting toward the ground.

The cause of the crash is not yet known

Videos of the collision suggest human error is to blame, Flynn said. Before colliding, Flynn said the video shows they were trying to line up closely — wing tip to wing tip — but failed to safely rejoin in formation, a routine maneuver.

Advertisement

Officials have not yet released any information about what may have contributed to the crash. Umayam said the investigation is ongoing amid efforts to recover the damaged aircraft.

“Our priority is to ensure the safety and well-being of our personnel, as well as security of the aircraft during the recovery,” Umayam told The Associated Press in an email.

The skills used in air show performances are different from those used in day-to-day routine flying or flying in combat, Flynn said. He calls it “the difference between showmanship and airmanship.”

That’s why most military air show crews are assigned to just do display flights during the show season, he said.

Advertisement

The Growler display flight crews are all flight instructors from Whidbey Island. Their core duties generally include training pilots and electronic warfare officers from the Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force.

Ejecting is a complicated process

Ejection seats use a complex system of motors and parachutes to propel crew members away from a plane in an emergency. First the canopy is pushed away from the aircraft with a blast so it poses no danger to the crew. Then the seat is launched upward and out of the plane, using solid rocket motors, before the parachute deploys and the seat drops away as the crew member descends to the ground.

“You’ve got to have enough altitude, you’ve got to be clear of any obstacles and then even after all that’s successful, you can injure your back,” said aviation expert Jeff Guzzetti. “Just the massive, propulsive force of the ejection seat can compress the spine, or your limbs may flail.”

Guzzetti said ejections are sometimes not possible during midair collisions because the damage to aircraft can be too extensive. But the way the two Navy planes came together may have allowed the opportunity to eject, he said.

Advertisement

“If they had hit each other at a faster speed, they would have done structural damage and the airplane would have come apart,” he said.

The two Growlers were using a seat manufactured by the U.K-based company Martin-Baker, the company said. Martin-Baker described itself as the leading manufacturer of ejection seats, including seats used by the Navy since 1958. The company says its seats have saved the lives of more than 2,000 Navy crew members since then.

The explosiveness of an ejection puts tremendous force on the crew member — as much as 20 times the force of gravity, said Michael O’Donnell, a former Federal Aviation Administration official who also worked on ejection seats in the Air Force. That’s enough force to temporarily make a person up to an inch shorter after ejection, he said

“A really, really bad roller coaster ride is not even close to that,” O’Donnell said.

Advertisement

The Growlers are irreplaceable

The plane remains the Navy’s most advanced airborne electronic attack tool, according to the Electronic Attack Squadron (VAZ) 129’s website. The squadron is stationed at the Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, where it maintains 55 of the specialized planes.

But Boeing stopped building new Growlers several years ago.

“These are invaluable national assets,” Flynn said. “There is no newer version of these — they are a very special, very powerful electronic warfare platform, and there’s never enough of them. And now we’ve lost two.”

Air shows are inherently dangerous

Pilots who perform at air shows are among the best, but there is little room for error, said aviation safety expert John Cox, CEO of Safety Operating Systems.

Advertisement

“Air show flying is demanding. It has very little tolerance,” Cox said. “The people who do it are very good and it’s a small margin for error. I’m glad everybody was able to get out.”

The air show industry has been working to improve safety for years at the roughly 200 events held annually in the U.S. The last fatal crashes at an air show came in 2024 when two people were killed in separate accidents at different events.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Grandfather receives pioneering UK-first operation to treat brain issue

Published

on

Grandfather receives pioneering UK-first operation to treat brain issue

“And that means he can get the best of both worlds of the surgical treatment of his aneurysm – the best possible, durable cure for his aneurysm while cutting down on the drawbacks of having surgery including big cuts and scars, big incisions on the head and also the morbidity of going through the brain and retracting the brain – all that is completely taken away by this minimal access surgery.”

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Even if the UK changes prime minister, voters now expect to hear the language of populism

Published

on

Even if the UK changes prime minister, voters now expect to hear the language of populism

Beyond the high drama surrounding the Makerfield by-election and the contest to be the UK prime minister lies a more fundamental battle. It is the struggle between the incremental pragmatism of mainstream politics and the magical thinking of populism.

The great catchword of recent UK politics has been “change”. Brexit, it was said, would change the country’s declining position in the world. Boris Johnson said after his landslide electoral victory in 2019 that he was going to take on “the problems that no government has had the guts to tackle before”.

Labour’s 2024 election manifesto, entitled “Change”, declared that a Starmer-led government would “stop the chaos, turn the page, and start to rebuild our country”.




À lire aussi :
English local elections 2026: a story of a new kind of politics

Advertisement

But people have different ideas of what change means and how fast it can happen.
In a world full of entrenched, unequal social structures and complex, intractable
global problems, change is inevitably a long-term project. But voters tend not to be in the business of long-term evaluation.

Similarly, they are not impressed by graphs showing that the UK economy is currently the fastest-growing in the G7 or that waiting times for NHS treatment in England are at their lowest level in more than three years.

There are undoubtedly better ways of communicating long-term change and
identifying quick wins than the current government has adopted. However, the real battle is not between rival tellers of the mainstream narrative, but between two completely different conceptions of change. Remembering this will be crucial for Andy Burnham when he takes on Reform UK in the Makerfield by-election in his bid to return to Westminster to challenge Keir Starmer for the leadership of the Labour party and his job as prime minister.

Feelings over facts

Populist leaders are successful not because they have more convincing policies for house-building, ending child poverty or realising energy security. The change they offer appeals to visceral feelings rather than material needs. “Imagine how you will feel on the day that we come to power,” they say. “Think of how shattered all of those people who have ignored you, talked down to you, taken your jobs and pushed ahead of you in the queue for services will feel.”

Advertisement

Populists such as Reform UK (according to current polls the most likely party to win the next UK general election) are less interested in setting out a policy programme than in connecting with voters’ raw nerves.

That is why the most crucial lesson for Labour from the 2026 local elections
was not their devastating defeat, but the unstoppable surge of Reform’s appeal to
voters that threatened to leave them in the margins in the next general election.
Labour’s reflex response was to look at deposing its leader. And possibly at least one of Starmer’s rivals for the job would be more effective at taking on this new form of political opposition.

More important, however, is to be clear what is involved in taking on
populism. A new prime minister will be faced with exactly the same challenges as
the current one and will not be able to deliver transformative change simply by force of an appealing personality.

Europe will still be involved in its longest war since 1945. The US will continue to be an unreliable partner. The climate emergency will go on wreaking havoc. Social care for an ageing population will remain a massive challenge. National debt will still limit the capacity for public investment. Regional disparities and indefensible social inequalities will still exist.

Advertisement

Graphs aren’t enough – Andy Burnham will have to show that he can speak to voters’ fears and frustrations.
R Heilig/Shutterstock

All of these challenges and more will result in sections of the electorate feeling alienated and disappointed – the very sentiments upon which populism depends.

The big question for whoever is going to be prime minister in the next three years is not just about policy and delivery (although it is also very much about that), but about offering an alternative to the psychic appeal of populism. That will entail adopting a three-point strategy.

First, politicians need to acknowledge the depth of disappointment felt by people whose parents and grandparents had once believed that the government was there to look after them in times of need. The prime minister should declare an urgent mission to build an infrastructure of cradle-to-grave care, which exists not to tell people how they should be feeling, but to be democratically accountable to their needs and priorities as individuals and communities.

Advertisement

Second, there is a need for a complete overhaul of political language, led by the prime minister’s example, eschewing the lexicon of technocratic cliche and adopting the conversational tone of speaking with rather than speaking at people.

Third, there is a need for boldness in calling out the ugly sentiments of populism and appealing explicitly to the more generous, positive feelings and beliefs of the majority that are too often excluded from the domain of hardheaded politics.

A new prime minister will need to be imaginative in demonstrating that populists are not the only ones who can appeal to people’s deepest apprehensions and desires. And they will have to show that politics can be more like an inclusive conversation than a PowerPoint presentation. In that case, then perhaps the recent soap opera will not be as inconsequential as many people perceive it to be.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Labour leadership rivals reportedly in Brexit stance row

Published

on

Andy Burnham planning Westminster return 'within weeks', reports say

Wes Streeting, who resigned as health secretary last week, signalled he wanted to see Britain return to the EU as he announced on Saturday he would stand in any Labour leadership contest.

Supporters of Andy Burnham are reportedly furious with Mr Streeting, according to the Times, as they believe it is a deliberate attempt to raise the issue of Brexit in leave-voting Makerfield, where the Greater Manchester Mayor hopes to stand as a parliamentary candidate.

Mr Burnham sought to play down his own support for rejoining the trade bloc as he took part in a media blitz across the weekend.

Andy Burnham is seen as a Labour leadership contender (Image: Newsquest)

He insisted there was a “long-term case” for advocating to join the EU, but insisted he was not campaigning on that issue in the by-election.

Advertisement

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy rebuked her former colleague, Mr Streeting, for making Europe a centre-point of his campaign to succeed Sir Keir, describing it as “odd”.

“If rejoining the EU is the answer, then essentially what we’re saying to people is, ‘life was fine in 2015, we just need to go back there’,” added Ms Nandy, who is seen as an ally to the Greater Manchester Mayor.

Reform UK, which is the second-placed party in Makerfield, plans to make hay out of Mr Burnham’s previous support for rejoining the EU as it knocks on doors in the constituency.

Several media outlets reported that Nigel Farage branded the Greater Manchester Mayor “open borders Burnham”, indicating the Reform leader plans to campaign on the impact future EU membership could have on inward migration to the UK.

Advertisement

“Andy Burnham’s position raises serious questions.

“At a time when millions of voters are demanding control of our borders, he continues to advocate re-joining a European project built around the free movement of 500 million people,” Mr Farage told the Daily Express.

Sir Keir Starmer, who reportedly spent the weekend at his Chequers country estate, is said to be privately considering whether he will contest challenges to his leadership, despite having publicly insisted he will fight them.

Ms Nandy appeared to veer away from the government line that Sir Keir would stand against his rivals as she spoke to broadcasters on Sunday morning, telling the BBC: “It’s a very personal decision for him.”

Advertisement

She later added: “So, I wouldn’t write off the Prime Minister, but I would just say that this is a very personal decision.

“He’s got to make that decision himself.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Former Los Angeles police detective Mark Fuhrman, key figure in OJ Simpson murder trial, dies

Published

on

Former Los Angeles police detective Mark Fuhrman, key figure in OJ Simpson murder trial, dies

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — Former Los Angeles police detective Mark Fuhrman, who was convicted of lying during testimony at the OJ Simpson murder trial, has died. He was 74.

Fuhrman was one of the first two police detectives sent to investigate the 1994 killings of Simpson’s ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ronald Goldman, in Los Angeles. He reported finding a bloody glove at Simpson’s home but his credibility came under attack during the trial as the defense raised the prospect of racial bias.

Under cross-examination, Fuhrman testified that he had never made anti-Black racial slurs in the past decade, but a recording made by an aspiring screenwriter showed he had done so repeatedly.

Lynn Acebedo, the chief deputy coroner in Kootenai County, Idaho, said that Fuhrman died May 12. The county does not release the cause of death as a rule.

Advertisement

Fuhrman retired from the Los Angeles Police Department after Simpson’s 1995 acquittal. He subsequently moved to Idaho with his wife Caroline and their young daughter and son and set up a 20-acre (eight-hectare) farm, raising chickens, goats, sheep and llamas.

In 1996, Fuhrman was charged with perjury and pleaded no contest. He later became a TV and radio commentator and wrote the book “Murder in Brentwood” about the killings.

A criminal-court jury found Simpson not guilty of murder in 1995, but a separate civil trial jury found him liable in 1997 for the deaths and ordered him to pay $33.5 million to relatives of Brown and Goldman. He served nine years in prison on unrelated charges and died in Las Vegas of prostate cancer in 2024 at the age of 76.

____

Advertisement

Golden reported from Seattle.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘Starmer sabotages Burnham’ and ‘Best of buddies’

Published

on

'Starmer sabotages Burnham' and 'Best of buddies'
The headline on the front page of the Daily Telegraph reads: "Starmer sabotages Burnham on Brexit".

“Starmer sabotages Burnham on Brexit” is the Daily Telegraph’s lead story. It writes that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer “has raised the prospect of rejoining the EU” while Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham “seeks to keep Leave voters on side”, despite his “previous desire to reverse the 2016 referendum”. Sir Keir has been seeking closer ties with the bloc but has stuck to Labour’s election manifesto pledges to “stay outside the EU”, with “no return to the single market, the customs union, or freedom of movement”.

"Starmer's defiant message: I won't walk away" reads the headline on the front page of the Daily Mirror.

“I won’t walk away” is how the Daily Mirror quotes Sir Keir in its headline, describing his message to Labour colleagues as “defiant”. It reports the prime minister “rejects call to set out departure timetable”, despite pressure from some Labour MPs and senior ministers. The front page also embeds a photograph showing Alan Titchmarsh, David Beckham and King Charles III at the Chelsea Flower Show, with the caption “best of buddies”.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025