A jury ruled unanimously Monday that Elon Musk waited too long to file his lawsuit against OpenAI, Sam Altman, and Microsoft, finding the defendants not liable on all claims after less than two hours of deliberation.
The nine-person jury found Altman, co-founder Greg Brockman, and OpenAI not liable on the breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment claims. On the same statute-of-limitations grounds, the jury rejected Musk’s claim that Microsoft aided and abetted a breach of OpenAI’s charitable trust.
The verdict, reached on the first morning of deliberations, caps a three-week trial in federal court in Oakland that drew testimony from some of the most prominent figures in the tech industry and threatened to reshape the AI landscape.
Steven Molo, a lawyer for Musk, reportedly said in court that he was preserving the right to appeal but had not yet decided how to proceed.
Microsoft’s statement: “The facts and the timeline in this case have long been clear, and we welcome the jury’s decision to dismiss these claims as untimely. We remain committed to our work with OpenAI to advance and scale AI for people and organizations around the world.”
Musk co-founded OpenAI in 2015 as a nonprofit dedicated to the safe development of artificial intelligence, contributing an estimated $38 million before leaving the board in 2018.
He filed suit in 2024, claiming Altman, Brockman, and others had transformed OpenAI into a for-profit venture, betraying the mission he helped fund. Microsoft, which has invested more than $13 billion in OpenAI since 2019, was later added as a defendant.
The three claims that went to trial are breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment against OpenAI, Altman, and Brockman, and aiding and abetting breach of charitable trust against Microsoft. The nine-person jury’s verdict is advisory; U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers will make the final determination on liability.
The trial ran for three weeks in federal court in Oakland, with testimony from Musk, Altman, Brockman, former OpenAI chief scientist Ilya Sutskever, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, and Microsoft CTO Kevin Scott, among many other witnesses called by the parties in the case.
Internal emails, text messages, and deposition transcripts revealed the inner workings of the Microsoft-OpenAI partnership, including Nadella and other Microsoft executives weighing in on the composition of OpenAI’s board during the crisis that briefly ousted Altman as CEO in November 2023.
A central exhibit for Musk’s case was a March 2018 email in which Scott questioned whether OpenAI’s donors knew about its commercial plans, writing that he couldn’t imagine they had funded an open effort “so that they could then go build a closed, for profit thing on its back.” Microsoft went on to invest billions anyway.
Scott testified that he wrote the email as a skeptic evaluating the deal, not raising an alarm about its mission — and that he had donor Reid Hoffman, not Musk, in mind.
In closing arguments, Microsoft’s attorney Russell Cohen of Dechert told jurors the email showed only that “Microsoft took time to get answers to those questions before entering a risky and important partnership.”
A key defense argument across both closing days centered on a September 24, 2020 tweet in which Musk wrote that OpenAI had come to “seem like the opposite of open” and appeared “essentially captured by Microsoft.”
Cohen argued the post proved Musk believed his alleged promises were broken years before he filed suit — potentially putting his claims outside the three-year statute of limitations. He closed his argument by urging jurors to find the claims time-barred.
“We just ask you to remember one thing, the tweet,” Cohen said, asking them to find that the statute of limitations prevents Musk from making the claims against Microsoft.
On the opening day of trial, Microsoft and OpenAI announced an amended partnership, making Microsoft’s IP license non-exclusive, freeing OpenAI to serve products on any cloud provider, and ending Microsoft’s revenue-share payments to OpenAI. Amazon moved the next day to bring OpenAI’s models to its cloud platform.
Musk has asked the judge to remove Altman and Brockman from their roles at OpenAI, unwind the company’s 2025 conversion to a for-profit public benefit corporation, and return what he calls wrongful gains to the OpenAI nonprofit.
His damages expert initially put the combined figure as high as $134 billion. The judge questioned those numbers, and the remedies phase is being heard separately.
You’re not limited to using Samsung pay just because it’s a Galaxy Watch
Yes, you can tap your Samsung Galaxy Watch to pay for purchases and transportation with cards saved on your Google Wallet. You just have to set it up and make sure you meet a couple of criteria. First, both Google Wallet and its tap-to-pay capability must be available in your region. They’re already supported in the US, and you can check Wallet’s help page to see if they’ve already rolled out to your location.
Second, your Galaxy Watch must be running Wear OS version 2.0 or newer, which puts Samsung’s Tizen-powered Galaxy Watch 1, 2 and 3 models out of the running. If you have a Samsung Galaxy Watch 4 or a later model, go ahead and follow our instructions below. To check if you have a supported device, swipe down on your smartwatch, go to Settings and then tap “About watch.” From there, you can find its Wear OS version under “Software information.”
Screenshots by Mariella Moon (Samsung)
Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.
Need some help with today’s Mini Crossword? A couple of the clues were tricky today. Read on for all the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.
If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.
Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword
Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.
The completed NYT Mini Crossword puzzle for June 19, 2026.
1A clue: Distort, as data
Answer: SKEW
5A clue: Give a ❤️ on a text thread
Answer: LOVE
6A clue: Like a post that’s been shared a bajillion times
Answer: VIRAL
7A clue: Signs of things to come
Answer: OMENS
8A clue: Dog walker’s restraint
Answer: LEASH
1D clue: Snail’s trail
Answer: SLIME
2D clue: Home to kimchi and Kim Jong Un
Answer: KOREA
3D clue: Bob ___ (restaurant chain)
Answer: EVANS
4D clue: Like the phrase “pen gwyn” (“white head”), from which the penguin gets its name
Answer: WELSH
6D clue: Loudness dial: Abbr.
Answer: VOL
As India cut off access to messaging app Telegram for a week over concerns about exam-related fraud, users turned to virtual private networks (VPNs) and alternative messaging apps in unusually large numbers.
App intelligence firm Appfigures told TechCrunch that Tuesday, the day India announced the Telegram restriction, marked the biggest day for VPN app downloads in the country since at least the start of 2025. Downloads of major VPN apps rose 49% from a recent daily average of 139,000 to 208,000, the firm said.
Proton VPN and Turbo VPN recorded some of the largest increases. Downloads of Proton VPN on Apple’s App Store in India jumped 113%, while Turbo VPN downloads rose 85%. On Google Play, downloads of Proton VPN climbed 64% and Turbo VPN downloads increased 35%. NordVPN’s App Store downloads increased 41%, while ExpressVPN downloads on Google Play rose 31%.
The surge also pushed several VPN services up India’s app-store charts. Proton VPN climbed from 18th to 5th in Apple’s Utilities rankings between June 16 and June 18, while its Google Play ranking rose from 8th to 2nd in the Tools category, according to Appfigures.
The spike in VPN demand followed India’s decision to temporarily restrict Telegram until June 22 over concerns that fraudsters were using the platform to target candidates ahead of a re-test for the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (Undergraduate), the country’s largest entrance examination by applicant volume. The Indian government said the measure was needed to prevent the spread of fake exam papers and related scams. Telegram has challenged the order in the Delhi High Court, arguing that authorities should target specific content rather than block the entire platform.
The response extended beyond app-store download data. Proton said daily registrations from India rose 120% above baseline levels on Wednesday, after hourly registrations had already spiked 150% on Tuesday evening following the Telegram restriction. The company described the increase as “extremely noteworthy” given its existing scale in the country.
Canadian VPN service provider Windscribe reported a similar trend. The company told TechCrunch that signups from India peaked roughly 100% above baseline levels, while first-time downloads of its iOS app in the country rose about 89%.
“The spike in India follows the same general trend we see in areas that ban specific apps, introduce age bans or verification requirements, or otherwise restrict internet access,” Rebecca Rosenberg, growth operations manager at Windscribe, said.
The trend was not limited to a handful of VPN providers. Sensor Tower told TechCrunch that downloads across the VPN app category in India rose 10% day-over-day on June 17, reversing a decline seen over the previous two weeks.
Users also appeared to be exploring alternatives to Telegram. Appfigures said downloads of Signal in India rose 72% on Apple’s App Store and 322% on Google Play following the restriction, while Viber’s App Store downloads increased 216%.
Telegram-linked messaging app iMe recorded one of the sharpest jumps. Its Google Play downloads rose from a recent daily average of about 827 to 50,900 on June 16, Appfigures said.
Yet the restriction did not immediately translate into lower Telegram usage. Sensor Tower said Telegram’s daily active users in India rose 17% on the day the measure was announced — the app’s largest day-over-day increase in the country since a widespread outage of Meta’s services in 2021.
Other data points also suggest heightened efforts to access Telegram following the restriction.
Cloudflare Radar Lead Lai Yi Ohlsen told TechCrunch that DNS requests for Telegram domains in India increased sharply over the two days after the measure was announced. The company cautioned that higher DNS traffic does not necessarily indicate successful access to the platform, and could reflect users repeatedly attempting to reach Telegram after it was blocked.
Telegram pointed to its efforts to cooperate with authorities during hearings in the Delhi High Court this week. Its lawyers said the company had removed channels identified by authorities and questioned the need for a platform-wide restriction affecting what Telegram says are over 150 million users in India.
Government lawyers defended the measure as a temporary, event-linked response tied to the NEET re-test. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the court that a permanent ban could raise proportionality concerns but argued the current restriction had a “logical nexus” to the objective being pursued.
After hearing arguments from Telegram and the government on Thursday, the Delhi High Court reserved its order and is expected to deliver its verdict on Friday.
The debate echoes questions raised elsewhere when governments restrict access to major online platforms. Sensor Tower said VPN downloads in the U.S. rose more than 40% week-over-week when TikTok was briefly removed from U.S. app stores in 2025, while Windscribe said it has observed similar patterns following restrictions in countries including Iran and Russia.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
After all, pictures are only worth a thousand words.
Instagram just added a long-requested feature. The platform now lets users add unique captions to each carousel slide. Previously, all slides fell under the same caption, which certainly got in the way of telling a coherent multi-image story.
This is accessible via a toggle when tapping the caption area. This way, it’s up to users if they want to put in the extra effort to think of a bunch of new captions.
It’s rolling out right now, but it could take a week or so to reach every Instagram user. This follows an update from a couple of years ago in which the platform doubled the number of photos that can be used in a carousel from 10 to 20. Mixing 20 photos with 20 captions should certainly allow for some novel content.
The image-based social media platform has been making changes all over the place lately. The in-app camera now supports Ultra HDR and Night Sight on Android devices. Additionally, the platform now lets users personalize the algorithm and reorder posts on the grid.
Spotify has launched Reserved by Spotify, a ticketing feature that holds concert tickets for Premium subscribers based on their streaming habits. The service runs on a multi-year exclusive deal with Live Nation, with Ticketmaster processing all transactions.
TL;DR
Spotify on Wednesday launched Reserved by Spotify, turning the concert ticketing concept it unveiled last month into a live product. The feature automatically holds up to two concert tickets for Premium subscribers based on their listening habits, making Spotify the first audio streaming platform to offer dedicated pre-sale ticket access.
The first artist to participate is indie-pop singer Role Model, according to Music Business Worldwide. Eligible fans will receive notifications with a roughly 24-hour purchase window opening on 23 June.
Reserved analyses a subscriber’s streaming data, including how often they listen to an artist, how long they have followed them, and whether their behaviour appears organic rather than bot-driven. There will reportedly be more superfans than available seats for any given tour, so not everyone who qualifies will receive an offer.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
The tickets come from a dedicated inventory that is not carved from any other presale pool. Spotify is positioning this as an alternative to the bot-infested public sale process that has frustrated concertgoers for years.
Location also matters. Spotify checks that a user is near a show before extending an offer, filtering out fans who are unlikely to attend.
Reserved runs on a multi-year exclusive partnership with Live Nation, with all ticket transactions processed through Ticketmaster. Spotify is reportedly paying tens of millions of dollars for the exclusivity, outbidding Apple and Amazon, according to Bloomberg.
The exclusivity means Reserved only covers shows promoted by Live Nation, not all concerts. Spotify itself collects no fees on ticket sales, betting instead that tying concert access to Premium subscriptions will reduce subscriber churn.
Ticketing fraud remains a multibillion-dollar problem for the music industry. Bots routinely snap up tickets within seconds of a public sale, funnelling them to resale platforms at inflated prices.
Spotify says it monitors for bot activity and artificial listening patterns, and will not reward users who inflate their play counts through passive or automated streams. The company has not disclosed the specific thresholds or algorithms it uses to distinguish genuine fans from gamers of the system.
Spotify has previous form in policing its platform for fraudulent activity, having removed hundreds of thousands of AI-generated songs over suspicious listening patterns. Reserved applies a similar detection philosophy to ticketing, treating organic fandom as a credential that unlocks real-world access.
For artists, Reserved offers a way to ensure their most engaged fans get into the room rather than scalpers. Spotify’s relationship with musicians has been contentious, particularly over royalty payments, but a feature that directs concert revenue toward performers could shift the dynamic.
The feature is US-only at launch, with no confirmed timeline for international expansion. Whether Reserved can meaningfully dent the secondary ticketing market will depend on how many artists and tours opt in, and whether Live Nation’s competitors build their own streaming-linked presales in response.
Google just introduced a new smart home speaker yesterday, but the arrival of a new product heralds the end of others. The company has confirmed that it will end production of the Nest Home Mini and Nest Audio. These Nest devices have been on the market for around five years (or longer, if you count 2017’s Google Home Mini) and it seems logical for Google to prioritize the newer generation given the current strategy of putting its Gemini chatbot everywhere it possibly can.
Although the pair of speakers has been discontinued, any of the two smart home products in the wild will remain operational. “Existing Nest Mini and Nest Audio devices will continue to be fully supported with regular software updates, security patches and customer care,” a rep from Google told Engadget. The new Google Home speaker is priced at $100, the same as the outgoing Nest Audio, but significantly more than the Nest Home Mini, which retailed at $50 and could often be found for cheaper.
Why you can trust TechRadar
We spend hours testing every product or service we review, so you can be sure you’re buying the best. Find out more about how we test.
The Circular Ring 2 is an ambitious smart ring. On paper, it has almost everything you need. Alongside standard health, recovery and sleep tracking, it offers features you won’t find on many rivals, including electrocardiogram (ECG) readings and atrial fibrillation (AFib) detection. Circular is also promising blood pressure and blood glucose trend monitoring in future updates.
At first glance, it feels like a genuine challenger to the likes of Oura, RingConn and Samsung. The ring itself looks good, feels lightweight on the finger and comes with a charging case, which is a welcome upgrade over the previous Circular model. Battery life is solid too, lasting around six days during my testing.
But unfortunately, the day-to-day experience doesn’t live up to that impressive spec sheet.
The biggest issue is the software. Smart rings don’t have screens, which means the app is incredibly important. That’s where the Circular Ring 2 struggles the most.
Syncing regularly took several minutes, occasionally failed altogether and often required multiple attempts. Several times I opened the app to check my data, waited for it to sync, gave up and closed it again.
The app itself feels cluttered and unintuitive. Health data is scattered across multiple screens, navigation can be confusing and the language often feels strangely robotic.
One morning, for example, I was told my sleep was “Incorrect” and the next my wellness summary informed me: “Your sleep was correct. Your energy seems low. Your body and mind are unbalanced.” Rather than helping me understand my health, experiences like this often left me more confused.
Some of the ring’s most exciting features also failed to impress. ECG and AFib monitoring never fully worked during my testing, while promised blood pressure and glucose tracking features have yet to arrive.
What makes all of this especially frustrating is that when I revisited my Circular Ring Slim review from back in 2024, I found many of the same complaints. The hardware has definitely improved, but the software experience still feels a step behind the competition.
The Circular Ring 2 isn’t a bad smart ring. It has a good design, respectable battery life and an ambitious feature set. But in a market increasingly dominated by the best smart rings from polished competitors like Oura, RingConn and Samsung, ambition alone isn’t enough. Right now, Circular still feels like a company with great ideas struggling to execute them.
|
Component |
Circular Ring 2 |
|
Price |
£280 (black), £360 (silver), £440 (rose gold, gold) / $349, $449, $549 / AU$497, AU$639, AU$782 |
|
Dimensions |
2.55mm thick, 7.8mm wide |
|
Weight |
3g |
|
Finish |
Black, silver, rose gold, gold |
|
Sizes |
6 to 14 |
|
Material |
Titanium body, hypoallergenic interior with a PVD coating |
|
Battery life |
Up to 8 days (power mode); 5 days (performance mode) |
|
Sensors |
ECG, PPG, temp sensor, 3x accelerometer |
|
Connection |
Bluetooth |
|
Water resistance |
Fully waterproof (rating not specified) |
Rather than arriving as a traditional retail release, the Circular Ring 2 began life as a Kickstarter project in 2025 before gradually rolling out to customers through late 2025 and into 2026.
Pricing starts at £280 / $349 / AU$497 for the black version, rising to £360 / $449 / AU$639 for the silver model I tested. The gold and rose gold finishes sit at the top of the range at £440 / $549 / AU$782.
At first glance, the Circular Ring 2 looks competitively priced. One of its biggest selling points is that it doesn’t require a mandatory subscription to access core features, unlike the Oura Ring 4, which starts at £349 / $349 / AU$534 and also requires an additional monthly membership fee of £5.99 / $5.99
However, the picture becomes a little more complicated when you look closer. Circular is already promoting upcoming premium features, including blood pressure and blood glucose trend monitoring, which aren’t available but are expected soon. The company says these features will either require a subscription or can be unlocked using Circular Coins, which are earned through regular use, but details remain limited and pricing has yet to be confirmed.
Looking across the wider smart ring market, the Circular Ring 2 sits in a crowded middle ground. It’s cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Ring, which starts at £399 / $399 / AU$699, but more expensive than the RingConn Gen 2 at £299 / $299 / AU$460. There are also budget-focused options now, like the Amazfit Helio Ring, which costs significantly less at £149.90 / $149.99 / AU$269.
The problem isn’t necessarily the asking price here but more that the performance doesn’t justify it. While the Circular Ring 2 undercuts some of the biggest names in the category, like Oura, Samsung and RingConn, they all currently offer a more polished experience. That makes the Circular Ring 2 difficult to view as good value, even before any future premium features are brought into the equation.
I liked the design of the Circular Ring 2. The fit was very comfortable throughout testing, even when I was sleeping, and at just 2g it felt light on my finger. The silver finish also looks fairly premium.
Circular offers a wide range of sizes here, from 6 to 14, which beats most rivals. I tested a size 8 on my left index finger, which matched the recommendation from Circular’s new digital AI sizing tool.
While the company still offers a traditional sizing kit as well, it’s nice to see a less wasteful digital alternative that actually proved accurate in my case. Especially considering you’ll need to pay an extra £5 / $5 for Circular’s traditional sizing kit.
The Circular Ring 2 has softer, more rounded edges than rivals like the RingConn Gen 2 or previous Circular Ring Slim. Whether that’s a positive or negative will come down to personal preference, but it does make the ring feel slightly chunkier than some competitors despite it being one of the slimmest choices available at 2.5mm thick. A small circular logo on the outer edge makes it easy to get the right way round so that the sensors are where they need to be.
I tested the silver model, which I’d recommend over the black version. Black smart rings tend to show scratches more easily, and that was one of the big problems on the previous Circular Ring Slim. After two weeks of wear, my ring had picked up a few minor scuffs but was in good condition overall.
Another welcome improvement here is the charging case. Unlike the Circular Ring Slim, which relied on a charging cable and small plinth, the Ring 2 ships with a compact clamshell charging case that’s easy to carry and use.
Overall, the ring’s design is one of the Circular Ring 2’s biggest strengths. The company has clearly refined the hardware. Unfortunately, as we’ll see later, the software hasn’t evolved at the same pace.
The Circular Ring 2 has an ambitious set of features. Alongside standard health, sleep and activity tracking, it measures metrics like heart rate, heart rate variability (HRV), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), skin temperature and breathing rate.
There are also women’s health features designed to track hormonal shifts and fertility, plus stress monitoring, guided breathing exercises, medication reminders and an AI assistant called Kira.
The headline features are ECG measurements and AFib detection, both of which are rare in smart rings. Circular is also promising blood pressure and blood glucose trend monitoring in future updates, though neither feature was available during testing and both will sit behind a premium-ish model when they arrive. Blood pressure is not easy to measure with LED-based optical heart rate sensors, without an inflatable cuff for calibration: it will be interesting to see what form the blood pressure feature eventually takes, and whether it will be accurate.
On paper, it’s an impressive package that rivals, and in some cases actually exceeds, what you’ll find from bigger names in this space.
The Circular Ring 2 made a good first impression. Basic metrics like steps, heart rate and sleep tracking all seemed reasonable during the first few days of testing. But the longer I wore it, the more problems started to emerge.
The biggest issue is the app. Smart rings don’t have screens, which means if you think about it, the app effectively is the product, much like a Whoop band. That’s where the Circular Ring 2 falls behind rivals.
Syncing is frustratingly slow. Pulling data from the ring often took several minutes and occasionally failed altogether, forcing me to try again. That might sound like a small complaint, but it adds unnecessary friction. Several times I found myself opening the app, waiting for data to sync, then simply closing it again. If I owned this ring long-term, I suspect I’d eventually stop checking the app altogether.
The app itself feels cluttered and unintuitive. Health insights, scores, charts and features are scattered across multiple screens, while the home page is filled with circles, cards and widgets competing for attention. Even as someone who tests wearables for a living, I often found it harder than it should be to locate specific information.
The language doesn’t help either. As mentioned above, the app kept telling me my sleep was “Incorrect”, or my body was “unbalanced”, which left me confused rather than enlightened.
The AI assistant, Kira, wasn’t much better, largely repackaging existing data in a confusing format with tiny fonts and a huge chunk of text with generic recommendations, like “stay hydrated”. Some of the ring’s most exciting features also failed to deliver. ECG and AFib monitoring never fully worked during my testing, repeatedly getting stuck on a loading screen.
Sleep tracking was generally accurate when I followed a conventional sleep schedule, but it struggled with fragmented sleep and occasionally recorded inaccurate sleep times. On several occasions I woke up for a few hours before going back to sleep, only for the ring to record the entire period as one continuous sleep session.
Workout tracking isn’t what smart rings do best. But here it still feels like an afterthought. Sports Sessions are hidden away, must be started manually and there’s no automatic workout detection, unlike competitors like the Oura Ring 4 and Samsung Galaxy Ring. I also experienced a handful of smaller bugs, including random disconnections and occasional time zone changes despite not travelling anywhere.
Battery life is one area where the Circular Ring 2 performs well. Circular promises up to five days in Performance Mode and I managed six days during testing. That’s competitive with most major rivals and a significant improvement over the Circular Ring Slim.
Overall, the Circular Ring 2 feels like a smart ring with excellent ideas but inconsistent execution. Yes, the hardware is good, the feature list is impressive and the battery life is solid. But the software experience remains frustratingly rough around the edges, and in an increasingly competitive smart ring market, that’s difficult to overlook.
|
Category |
Comment |
Score |
|
Value |
There’s no subscription, which makes it seem like good value. But once you factor in the inconsistent performance and the strength of the competition, it’s difficult to justify the price. |
2.5/5 |
|
Design |
Lightweight, comfortable to wear and I liked the charging case. It doesn’t stand out against the best-looking smart rings on the market, but the hardware feels thoughtfully designed with minimal signs of wear. |
4/5 |
|
Features |
An impressive range of health, wellness and sleep tracking features, including ECG and AFib monitoring. The challenge isn’t the breadth of features available, but the fact that some are still missing despite being promised. |
4/5 |
|
Performance |
The feature set is promising, but it’s held back by slow syncing, buggy behavior and an app that feels cluttered and unfinished. Battery life is good, but an overall lack of polish makes it difficult to recommend. |
2.5/5 |
I tested the Circular Ring 2 for 2 weeks. I wore it 24/7 and only took it off to charge it and when I was lifting weights — I learned the hard way testing smart rings over the years that they’re very easy to scratch. It was on throughout workouts, working, socializing, relaxing on an evening and sleeping at night.
I’ve been reviewing smart rings since the very first iteration of the Oura ring came out in 2017 and have tested almost every generation from every smart ring brand since. Which puts me in a great position to compare models, tell you which is right for you and bring you that all important context about the smart ring industry.
Even as technology continues to push humanity forward in virtually every facet of modern life, it is often still fun to keep at least one eye trained on days of yesteryear. To that end, even some more forward-thinking companies have been known to indulge in a little shameless nostalgia in their product lines. Volkswagen went that route with its retro-inspired re-imagining of its iconic VW Bus.
While the all-electric ID Buzz wasn’t exactly a smashing success for VW, it was nothing if not a stylishly rendered slice of nostalgic automotive Americana. British company Morris Commercial is taking a similar approach with its Morris JE Van. And yes, that van is dramatically outdoing the electric VW retro appeal by taking inspiration from a much older vehicle, the Morris Commercial J-Type Work Van.
That van made its U.K. debut in the late-1940s, and became an instant hit with folks in need of a workhorse type van that still delivered on looks. It soon earned the nickname “The Big Little Van” due in part to its spacious interior and deceptively small exterior. That design also made it a big hit with government offices, as the J-Type was utilized by drivers in the Royal Mail and Post Office Telephone fleets. It would seem that Morris Commercial is not trying to re-invent the wheel with the new version of the J-Type, which it has dubbed the JE. In fact, the new models look almost identical to the old. Looks, however, are where the similarities end.
We should linger at least a minute on the looks of the Morris Commercial JE Van, as it was one of the most distinctively unique vehicles on the road upon its debut, and remains just as unique in its modern form. That being said, much like the SlashGear approved VW ID Buzz, you can probably still file this vehicle firmly under the “niche” section of the automotive market, as some drivers may not be ready to go full retro with their everyday cargo driver.
They might, however, still be tempted if they are looking for what looks to be a spaciously functional van that is fully electric. Yes, the Morris Commercial JE is eschewing the petrol-based engine of J-Type’s past in favor of battery power. It’s doing so without shorting drivers on power, with Morris Commercial claiming it boasts a 1-ton payload capacity. The vehicle also boasts a unique body design, with its fully recycled carbon monocoque body and aluminum skateboard chassis reportedly ranking it among the lightest commercial vehicles in the world.
As a cherry on top, Morris Commercial is also making the JE Van available in a range of unique color designs so you can make the interior and exterior all your own. The interior will also feature more modern fixtures like an infotainment screen. Now for the bad news, which is that the Morris Commercial JE is not yet available for purchase. In fact, it’s not yet in production, with the company claiming it’s eyeing 2028 for full-scale production status.
Liberty Bank launched an AI Center of Excellence with Flare AI to deploy secure, compliant AI across personal, commercial, and digital banking operations.
Liberty Bank, a 201-year-old mutual bank headquartered in Middletown, Connecticut, announced the launch of an AI Center of Excellence alongside a strategic partnership with Flare AI. The centre will serve as the hub for AI strategy, governance, and execution across the bank’s personal, commercial, and digital operations.
The partnership is structured around outcomes rather than software licences, according to David Hadd, Liberty Bank’s head of Business Transformation. “Flare’s role is to design, build, and help deploy AI systems on Liberty Bank’s behalf, compressing what has historically been a multi-year technology buildout into weeks, with the security, compliance, and governance controls regulated institutions require,” Hadd said.
Liberty Bank has over $9 billion in assets, 51 retail banking offices across Connecticut and Massachusetts, and more than 900 employees. It is the oldest and among the largest mutual banks in the United States. The bank says the initial focus will be on deploying secure AI systems to enhance productivity and customer experience, automating complex core processes, and building reusable AI capabilities.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol’ founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It’s free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
“For a bank our size, the challenge has never been ambition. It has been the time it takes to translate strategy into execution,” said David Glidden, President and CEO of Liberty Bank. The bank expects the AI Centre of Excellence to drive measurable impact across customer experience, operational efficiency, and growth. Large banks have warned that scaling AI in production is more expensive and error-prone than pilot programmes suggest, making governance and quality control critical from the start.
Flare AI CEO Scott Killoh said the company takes a different approach from platform vendors. “Most banks have been sold AI platforms and left to figure out the rest,” Killoh said. “We partner with institutions to deliver working AI systems that are secure, compliant, and tailored to their business.” Flare AI’s new President and Chief Strategy Officer, David Mitchell, previously spent six years as an executive at Liberty Bank, giving the partnership an unusual level of institutional familiarity.
The announcement reflects a broader shift in how regulated industries are adopting AI, moving from experimental chatbots toward structured, governed deployments with audit trails and compliance guardrails built in. For community banks competing against institutions with far larger technology budgets, the speed of deployment matters as much as the technology itself.
Xreal has officially unveiled its new Aura smart glasses. While they certainly won’t be cheap, they’ll still cost considerably less than Snap’s recently announced Specs.
The Aura runs Android XR, Google’s operating system for mixed reality devices, giving users access to a growing ecosystem of apps right out of the box.
Xreal hasn’t revealed exact pricing yet. However, the company says the Aura will launch for under $1,500 before tax when it arrives later this year. That’s a notable contrast to Snap’s Specs, which rely on proprietary software and are currently up for pre-order at $2,195.
The glasses feature an Optical See-Through (OST) display with a 70-degree field of view. They are powered by dual Sony Micro-OLED panels with a resolution of 1,920 x 1,200 per eye and a 120Hz refresh rate. Since the displays are transparent, users can still see their surroundings, though electrochromic dimming is included for moments when greater immersion is needed.
One of the Aura’s biggest selling points is its support for up to five floating app windows at once, with Google’s Gemini AI assistant built directly into the experience.
Rather than placing all of the hardware inside the glasses themselves, Xreal has opted for a split design. Processing is handled by a separate compute puck powered by the newly announced Snapdragon Reality Elite chipset, while an onboard X1S spatial co-processor manages low-latency tracking and display tasks.
The compute puck also houses a 4,455mAh battery, helping reduce the weight carried on the user’s face. Two configurations will be available, offering either 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage or 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage.
The Aura supports 6DoF tracking, hand-tracking controls, voice commands through Gemini, and onboard cameras with a visible LED indicator that activates when recording.
Xreal says the Aura will launch this autumn. Those interested can either reserve a standard spot for $100 and receive $200 in launch credit, or secure one of the company’s limited Founder Passes, which include a $300 discount.
No Jackpot Winner as $257 Million Prize Rolls Over to $269 Million Monday Draw
Weekend Open Thread: Tuckernuck – Corporette.com
Zimbabwe Requires Crypto Businesses to Register Annually Under New FIU Regulations
Bitget enters Argentina’s regulated crypto market through PSAV registration
NanoClaw integrates JFrog registries to secure AI agent downloads
This Week In Security: Microsoft On Microsoft, Register Your Domains, Linux On ARM, And FreeBSD Joins The File Cache Club
FBI searches office of Ohio voter registration group
Matt Damon’s Viral Sci-Fi Thriller Has Taken Over HBO Max
Anthropic staff to meet White House officials next week, Axios reports
As AI companies race to go public, who else is along for the ride?
Bitcoin could crash to $48,000, if this historical pattern is triggered
“Israel’s” ban on ICRC visits ruled illegal, but Knesset moves to stop them permanently
Ana Navarro unleashes explosive tirade on ex-Trump aide, Disney Channel star in epic on-air fight: 'Have you no shame?'
Warning of disruption as Cardiff Crossrail works to start
Financial Accounting | Last Day Revision Strategy and Booster | CMA Inter – June 2026
Tributes to former deputy head teacher at Cambridge school among death and funeral notices
Market Preview: SpaceX (SPCX) IPO Record, Federal Reserve Meeting, and Iran Nuclear Agreement
what doctors are seeing in ebike crashes
Kate Middleton Glare Goes Viral After Kids Booed At Royal Event
Deion Sanders Shares Powerful Post After Viral Advice To Deiondra
You must be logged in to post a comment Login