Suella Braverman was hit with a timely reminder of her legacy on X by her former colleague James Cleverly in a spat about asylum seekers.

Previously a home secretary under Rishi Sunak and Liz Truss, Braverman crossed the floor to join Nigel Farage’s party back in January.

However, in her new role as Reform’s education spokesperson, she seems to have forgotten exactly what she did in government.

The argument began when Reform leader Nigel Farage shared footage from within Cleverly’s constituency of Braintree showing groups of asylum seekers sitting on the street.

His caption read: “Just another day in James Cleverly’s constituency. Unless we get a Reform government, every town in Britain will look like this.”

Cleverly replied: “Wait until Nigel finds out that these people are in Braintree because Suella Braverman and Rob Jenrick opened an asylum accommodation centre in my constituency.

“Where are Rob and Suella now?”

Robert Jenrick, former Tory immigration minister under Braverman, is now Reform’s Treasury spokesperson.

Braverman hit back at Cleverly: “You were home secretary after me. If you were so opposed to Wethersfield, you could have shut it down. Why didn’t you do that?”

That post was hit with a community note from other X users stating that Cleverly recused himself from all decisions on that asylum accommodation centre as “per the ministerial code as the local MP”.

Cleverly also replied: “Have you never read the Ministerial Code?

“Are you not aware that ministers have to recuse themselves from decisions that would directly benefit themselves or their constituencies? Also I spent most of my time as Home Secretary clearing up the mess you left.”

The MP for Fareham and Waterlooville hit back by deflecting: “You should be apologising to the country for being one of those Tories who objected to leaving the ECHR- which is why the last Tory government failed to stop the boats.

“You should be apologising to the country for refusing the ban the IRGC – the source of extremism and terrorism in the UK.

“You should be apologising to the country for opening talks with Mauritius on Chagos. The country is still clearing up the mess you left.”

Their furious exchange comes amid a trying time for Reform UK.

Leader Farage triggered a by-election in his constituency of Clacton amid heightened scrutiny over a £5 million donation from a crypto billionaire which he failed to declare to parliament.

He was re-elected earlier this month, meaning the parliamentary sleaze probe into the gift has resumed.

Reform also surprisingly suspended prominent party member Tim Montgomerie last week after his frequent criticism of Reform’s home affairs spokesperson Zia Yusuf and of Farage.

The right-wing party has also lost its dominant lead in the polls since Andy Burnham replaced Keir Starmer in No.10.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.

For the past few days, the entertainment world has been abuzz with conflicting reports about Meghan Markle making an acting comeback in the unlikeliest of places.

Word on the street has been that the Duchess of Sussex had been eyed for a role in Guy Ritchie’s The Gentlemen.

First, she was in, then she was out, then she was never “in” in the first place – with the whole thing being made even more complicated by the fact that none of the parties involved had actually spoken out to confirm or deny the bizarre story.

So, for those who’ve not been following, or just need a recap, here’s a quick reminder of everything that’s been said so far – and, notably, who’s been saying it. Just keep in mind, none of this has actually been confirmed to true (so far!)…

It’s now been over six years since Prince Harry shocked the world by announcing that he and his wife Meghan would be stepping down from their roles as senior royals, and eventually moving overseas.

The rest has been well-documented, but after a Netflix documentary, a tell-all book and numerous revealing interviews, it’s fair to say that relations between the Sussexes and the rest of the Royal Family haven’t always looked the rosiest.

So, it came as another bolt from the blue last week when People magazine reported that the couple were planning to move back to the UK alongside their two children, seven-year-old Archie and five-year-old Lilibet.

People’s report claimed that two would “establish a private, non-royal home base in Britain” while keeping their production company Archewell overseas, and maintaining properties in the USA (Montecito, California, to be more specific) and Portugal.

It was also suggested that the wheels were already in motion, with Harry and Meghan having already enrolled their children in a school, where they’d begin classes when term begins in just over a week’s time.

This is when things began veering into “hold onto your hats, folks” territory.

While the motivations behind the Sussexes’ move were not disclosed, Australia’s news.com.au was the first to allege that the couple’s decision was based on the fact that Meghan had been “offered a role in an upcoming project based in the UK”, according to their undisclosed “entertainment sources”.

BBC News even picked up on the story, after which the showbiz outlet Variety claimed to have had it “confirmed”.

The journalist who broke the story, Bronte Coy, later told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that the role was “significant”, and that the Duchess of Sussex was “very excited about it”.

Meghan last acted in Suits, the TV show where she made her name internationally, before stepping down from the series in 2018 ahead of her marriage to Prince Harry.

Since then, she has had a number of on-screen roles, though not in an acting capacity, perhaps most notably her ill-fated Netflix lifestyle series With Love, Meghan and a guest judging stint on the Australian version of MasterChef.

Later this year, she’ll also make a cameo appearance as herself in the comedy Close Personal Friends, starring Oscar winner Brie Larson, Emily In Paris’ Lily Collins and Crazy Rich Asians’ Henry Golding.

Once whisperings about a return to the acting world for Meghan and a mysterious role she’d been offered, Deadline alleged within hours that she was being “eyed” for a role in a future season of Guy Ritchie’s hit gangster series The Gentlemen.

They cited unnamed “sources” who’d told them she was in the “early stages” to play a role in a potential third season, with a specific part having supposedly not yet “been identified”.

The Gentlemen is a spin-off of Guy’s film of the same name, and proved to be a huge hit with both critics and viewers when it premiered on Netflix in 2024, with a second run due to debut next week.

In the next run of episodes, series regulars Theo James and Kaya Scodelario will be joined by some new additions, most notably Love Island host Maya Jama.

Crucially, Deadline pointed out that the rumoured talks between Meghan and The Gentlemen were “hypothetical” because the show hasn’t even been commissioned for a third season yet.

They also alleged that reps for both the Sussexes and Netflix had “declined to comment”.

Meanwhile, The Hollywood Reporter had its own version of the story that same morning, suggesting these early talks were actually in the “advanced discussions” stage, and that Meghan’s role was “being written” after she and Guy met “through mutual acquaintances”.

Naturally, news of Meghan potentially appearing in a show like The Gentlemen raised eyebrows, with former Tatler and Vanity Fair editor Tina Brown – who penned the explosive royal book The Palace Papers in 2022 – claiming the following morning that the talks had abruptly ended.

“I learned this morning that the casting of Meghan Markle in season three of Guy Ritchie’s Netflix series The Gentlemen has been withdrawn,” she wrote on Substack. “The backlash in the UK was so intense, it became untenable to go forward. This does not bode well for Meghan’s acting comeback in the UK.”

She also teased “more to come”, but has not posted since Saturday morning.

Crucially, it’s worth remembering that Meghan’s “casting” in season three hadn’t even been established to be “withdrawn”, with the initial report claiming she’d only entered preliminary talks with show bosses, rather than receiving any kind of formal offer.

A day later, Complex quoted a journalist supposedly in the know, who’d posted on X that Meghan’s casting in The Gentlemen wasn’t “off” because “it was never on”.

He wrote that he knew Guy Ritchie, and that the original story was a “total fabrication” and “ridiculous”.

Well, that’s the exactly it – none of them have commented publicly, although HuffPost UK has contacted reps for the Duchess of Sussex, Netflix and Guy Ritchie for comment.

The second season of The Gentlemen, meanwhile, will begin streaming on Thursday 3 September…

In case you haven’t noticed, I like a sweet breakfast (though so-called “frambled” eggs make an acceptable alternative from time to time). If I could, I’d eat dessert every morning.

Which is why I was very, very excited to see banana fritters-eque fried flapjack bites all over my TikTok and Instagram pages.

So, I thought I’d give the ridiculously easy recipe, dubbed “banana nuggets” by food creator Tom Fauconnet, a go.

The posts I saw described banana nuggets as a very simple, minimum-three-ingredient recipe: chop up a banana and add it to a pan with oats and some Golden Syrup, maple syrup or honey.

Some recipes call for butter, and others don’t. But come on: I’m not skipping my beloved Kerrygold here.

I ended up using the following amounts of each:

• 1 banana
• 25g oats
• 10g butter
• 1 tablespoon Golden Syrup

As the heat warms the butter and sugar into a caramel, the oats bind to the banana slices, a little like a flapjack (shaking the pan helps to coat the sections without breaking them apart). And the longer they’re left in the pan, the more crispy and golden that buttery outer layer gets.

Like porridge, the exact measurements aren’t strict. You can mostly eyeball it: add more golden syrup and butter if the oats aren’t sticking, and more oats if your banana is looking conspicuously bald.

I’ll be honest, I wish I’d put more butter in mine. But I was almost out, and the recipe is forgiving – the oats still clung.

Spices like cinnamon are great here, too: I just sprinkled some over the oats in the pan.

I was really impressed by how quickly the mixture came together. For the first minute, it feels like you’ve horribly mismeasured – after that, though, the mix clumps together beautifully. Predictably, given this is basically caramel with toasted oats (which you should use in porridge, too), the smell is divine.

But to get the beginnings of a tan on the outer layer of my bites, I had to leave them in the pan for about seven minutes all-in. (I probably should have been more patient: 10 minutes would have been golden perfection).

The fun really starts once your “banana nuggets” have finished cooking. Many place them on a bed of Greek yoghurt before adding fruit, chocolate chips, nuts and sweet sauces.

Sadly (can you tell I tried this recipe before The Big Shop?), I didn’t have many of those options to play with. Instead, I had to try it with a single square of M&S’ (very good) dark cooking chocolate, which I suppose had the unintended upside of giving me a less tainted banana nugget experience.

Even without the extra toppings, and despite the fact that I undercooked them, these banana nuggets were delicious.

Their crispy, buttery (ignore butter-free recipes!) outer layer was crispy and nutty, giving way to soft, sweet banana.

It’s not quite as intense a contrast as deep-fried banana fritters, but it’s got its own flapjack-like appeal.

I really wish I’d had tart fruits, like raspberries, to eat this with, and Greek yoghurt should be considered an almost mandatory part of this dish. It needs something soft, creamy, and slightly tangy.

But even with those caveats, “banana nuggets”, which take minutes, taste amazing, and make your whole kitchen smell divine, have already transformed my breakfasts.

Just make sure to be more patient with the cook time than I was – and don’t skimp on the toppings.

Russia has hit out at Andy Burnham over his decision to share long-range missile blueprints with Ukraine.

The UK prime minister travelled to Ukraine on Monday – his first international trip since getting the keys to No.10 – and is expected to hand Kyiv key information on how to build the advanced rockets.

While marking 35 years since Ukraine first secured independence from the former USSR, Burnham will confirm that a key defence firm can release classified information on British components for the long-range missile SCALP.

It comes after the Kremlin already warned Britain of the “consequences” after it was confirmed that British drones had been used as part of Ukrainian attacks hitting targets deep within Russia.

Burnham brushed off the warnings, insisting that Britain is not a “fair-weather friend” to Ukraine.

Today, he said: “The Ukrainian people should be in no doubt: the UK is behind you today and for as long as it takes.

“I am proud of the contribution our country has made to Ukraine, and I want the Ukrainian people to hear it directly from me that our support will not waver. After all, Ukraine’s security is our security.”

The Kremlin’s spokesperson Dmitry Peskov was furious over the developments, telling Sky News: “[We view them] extremely negative.

“Britain is participating in this war on the side of the Kyiv regime.

“Britain is methodically and consistently adding fuel to the fire and methodically and consistently plotting to prevent a peaceful settlement process.”

“Who started the fire? That’s the question, isn’t it,” Burnham later replied when speaking to reporters in Kyiv on Monday.

The Russian embassy in London also criticised reports from the weekend which pointed out that it had not yet appointed a Russian ambassador to the UK.

Andrei Kelin left the post abruptly on July 21 after seven years in the top diplomatic post.

Embassy staff told The Times that they were not sure when he would be replaced, and the Foreign Office is yet to receive a list of potential candidates for the top job.

But writing on Telegram on Monday, the embassy disputed the article.

It said: “The embassy considers it necessary to note that nothing in its comment provided to the newspaper implies that the Russian side intends to downgrade the level of diplomatic relations between our two countries.

“Such conclusions belong solely to the author of the publication and are based on suggestions by his unnamed sources.”

The embassy notably added: “As for the state of Russia-UK relations across all areas, they have deteriorated to an unprecedentedly low level entirely on London’s initiative.”

The UK’s relationship with Russia cooled considerably after Vladimir Putin launched his illegal invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

But the Russian autocrat continues to wage war against his European neighbours in a brutal land grab.

Listen to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.