Politics
Eta Aquariid Meteor Shower 2026: When And How To Watch, UK
In April, stargazers got to enjoy the Lyrid meteor shower.
But if you missed it, don’t worry: since April 18, the Eta Aquariid meteor shower has also been falling, and it’s set to peak this week.
Here’s why it happens, when it’ll be at its brightest in the UK, and how to catch it:
What is the Eta Aquariid meteor shower?
As with the Lyrid meteor shower, it’s not that the comets are “shooting” towards us.
They’re part of the debris following a comet (in this case, comet Halley); in our journey around the sun, we pass through this space rubble, some of which then enters our atmosphere.
When they do that, they move so quickly that they compress and superheat the air surrounding them.
That leads to a glowing “head” and, sometimes, a streaking “tail” that stargazers will recognise as part of a meteor shower.
Royal Museums Greenwich (RMG) said on its site, “the beautiful streaks we see in the night sky can actually be caused by particles as small as a grain of sand.”
The debris of Halley’s comet is associated with two meteor showers. The other one, Orionid, is due in October 2026.
When will the Eta Aquariid meteor shower peak in the UK?
In the UK, your best odds are on Wednesday, 6 May, from midnight to dawn. But don’t despair if you miss it.
One of the things that makes the Eta Aquariid meteor shower distinct is that it doesn’t have a “sharp peak”, RMG said.
Instead, brilliant shows tend to cluster around a particular week. In 2026, that’s this week (May 4-10).
How can I see the 2025 Eta Aquariid meteor shower?
Look towards the Eastern horizon in the wee hours of Wednesday.
Steer clear of sources of light pollution, like street lamps, and wait. (Unfortunately, the peak of this meteor shower occurs alongside quite a bright moon, which might make the display less obvious).
The meteors should be visible to the naked eye, so you won’t need any special tools like binoculars.
Politics
The Night Agent Season 4 Will Be The Last, Netflix Confirms
Netflix has announced that its hit spy drama The Night Agent is coming to an end.
But first, the show will go out with a bang, with one last season.
On Monday, the streaming giant announced that the fourth run of The Night Agent had begun production, and that this would be the show’s final outing.
Creator Shawn Ryan said in a statement: “Ever since the initial success of The Night Agent, I’ve been obsessed with eventually delivering a proper and thrilling conclusion to the show and to Peter Sutherland’s journey.
“I’m so grateful to Netflix and Sony Pictures Television for partnering with me on The Night Agent and for giving us the space to deliver a definitive final season to our worldwide legion of fans.”
“We are hard at work to complete our story and to make our final season one our fans will never forget,” he added.

Christopher Saunders/Netflix
Based on the novel of the same name, The Night Agent premiered in 2023, introducing Gabriel Basso as FBI agent Peter Sutherland.
It eventually became something of a sleeper hit, with its first season notably becoming the third most-watched inaugural run for any Netflix original at that time, as well as becoming one of the most-watched shows of that year.
A second and third season followed in 2025 and 2026, respectively, with Netflix renewing it for a fourth run back in March.
Ryan said at the time: “It’s been a wild ride filming The Night Agent in five countries across three continents to this point and we’re so thrilled that the adventures of Peter Sutherland will continue into season four.
“Our writers, our cast and our crew stand ready to answer the call to bring our incredible fans even more twists, turns and thrills.”
The first three seasons of The Night Agent are now streaming on Netflix.
Politics
The left has fallen right into Reform’s trap
I want to be honest with you, because I think you deserve that. When I first heard about Reform UK’s new ‘Vote Green, Get Illegals’ policy – the plan to put migrant detention centres in Green-held constituencies rather than Reform ones – my instinctive reaction was discomfort. Real discomfort. I sat with it. I turned it over. I talked it through with friends, with colleagues. Because that is what you do when something troubles you, rather than simply reaching for the nearest banner and marching.
And what I found, when I sat with it long enough, was that my discomfort was pointing in entirely the wrong direction.
Reform’s plan, announced over the weekend by party chairman Zia Yusuf and leader Nigel Farage, is straightforward: a future Reform government would build detention centres capable of holding at least 24,000 illegal immigrants awaiting deportation. No such facility will be placed in any Reform-held constituency or council area. Green seats and councils, whose constituents voted for what the Green Party calls ‘a world without borders’, will be prioritised for detention centres. Reform has already published a draft Mass Deportation Detention Act. It means business.
The reaction has been, and I say this as someone who tries very hard to take other people’s feelings seriously, extraordinarily overwrought. The word ‘dystopian’ has been used so many times this week that it has lost whatever meaning it once had. The left has reached, with impressive reflex speed, for comparisons that I will not dignify by repeating. I understand why people feel strongly. I genuinely do. Strong feelings about where people live, about community, about safety – these are not irrational. They are, in fact, exactly the point.
What I find harder to understand, and this is where I have had to really interrogate my own instinct to be fair to everyone in the room, is the complaint from Rupert Lowe’s direction. Lowe, who now leads the Restore Britain party (having departed Reform in some acrimony), called the policy ‘petty nonsense’. He accused Reform of ‘vindictively target[ing] Brits in potential Green constituencies’. I have read this several times, because I wanted to make sure I was being fair to him. But Lowe’s own published proposals speak of making conditions so deliberately harsh that migrants leave voluntarily. His objection is not that Reform is being too tough. It is something more personal than that, and I think most reading this will recognise the dynamic: it is the complaint of someone who wanted a fight on his own terms, furious that someone else has set the agenda.
But here is the question I cannot stop asking, and it is not a comfortable one: who has been living with the consequences of our immigration policy up to now, and did anyone ask them how they felt about it? Because I know the answer, and it troubles me more than any detention centre ever could.
Those women and men who noticed, who raised their hands and said, quietly at first and then less quietly, that something in their street or their town or their child’s school had changed in ways nobody had prepared them for, were not treated with the seriousness their observations deserved. They were instead managed. They were reassured. They were, in the particular way that our political culture has perfected over 30 years, made to feel that their anxiety was the problem. The mothers tracking pressure on GP appointments, the women on night shifts noticing the changed texture of their neighbourhoods, the daughters trying to navigate social housing for elderly parents in areas absorbing numbers nobody had thought to mention: their experience was real. Their discomfort was not a personality defect.
‘Refugees Welcome’ signs, meanwhile, have long appeared in windows of houses in postcodes where no refugees were being sent. The consensus in favour of open borders was built by people whose daily lives were not affected by it. I do not say this in bitterness – I say it because it is simply, plainly true, and pretending otherwise has been doing real harm to real people for a very long time.
I worry about things. That is not something I apologise for. And what I worry about, when I think about this policy, is not the Green voter in a comfortable suburb who will write a strongly worded letter, and man a street stall. It is the woman in a town that has been absorbing dispersed asylum seekers through hotels and HMOs (houses in multiple occupation) for years – without consultation, without notice, without so much as a community meeting. The chaos of the status quo is not neutral. It is not kind. It has consequences, and those consequences have been falling on the people least able to make them stop.
Secure detention before orderly deportation is not, whatever this week’s headlines suggest, a form of cruelty. It is a form of clarity. It is the managed, legal and humane alternative to the sprawling and unaccountable system we have been living with. It is not ‘barbarism’ to detain people who have broken the law – it is administration. The barbarism has been the pretence that the current system is working.
And should democratic choices carry consequences? I think, if we are honest with ourselves, the answer has to be yes. We accept it everywhere else. We accept that communities voting for development get development, that those who choose certain policies inherit their results. The Greens have been entirely transparent about what they want: more asylum seekers and no borders. That is their honest position and voters are free to choose it. But the idea that you can vote for a borderless world and be wholly shielded from its practical consequences – the holding facilities and the processing centres – asks rather a lot of those who voted differently.
I have spoken this week with Reform members in areas their party doesn’t yet control. I expected anxiety. I found something closer to practicality – several have even written to suggest local former Royal Air Force bases they felt would be appropriate. People are more resilient, and more reasonable, than the people who claim to speak for them tend to assume.
I did not come to this position easily. I sat with my discomfort, as I said at the start, and I took it seriously. But sometimes what feels uncomfortable is simply the sensation of something true pressing against something we would prefer not to examine. The fury of the response to this policy has been, in the end, the most persuasive argument for it. Those who have spent 30 years ensuring that the consequences of their choices fell on other people are not well placed to lecture the rest of us about fairness.
I think you know that. I think you’ve known it for a while.
Gawain Towler is a commentator and an elected board member of Reform UK.
Politics
Britney Spears Pleads Guilty To Reckless Driving As DUI Charge Is ‘Dismissed’
Britney Spears’ legal team has spoken out after the pop star pleaded guilty to reckless driving.
In early March, the chart-topping singer was pulled over by the police and arrested while out driving in California.
After checking herself into a rehab treatment facility, it was subsequently announced that Britney had been charged with a misdemeanour of driving while under the influence.
Her lawyer, Michael A. Goldstein, told Rolling Stone on Monday that Britney’s DUI charge had been “dismissed” at a hearing – where she was not in attendance – and that she had instead pleaded guilty to reckless driving.
“She’s doing well,” Goldstein said outside the courthouse. “It was reduced. The DUI was dismissed. She entered a plea to reckless driving.”

He continued: “We appreciate the district attorney recognising the positive steps Britney has taken to help herself, and we expect that she’ll continue to do so.”
Per Rolling Stone, Britney has been sentenced to 12 months of summary probation, during which she will be subjected to searches by law enforcement while driving.
She must also continue her “mental health and substance treatment”, which is said to include “weekly meetings with her psychologist and twice-monthly visits with her psychiatrist”, in addition to a three-month DUI course.
Following her arrest, Britney’s spokesperson told HuffPost UK: “This was an unfortunate incident that is completely inexcusable. Britney is going to take the right steps and comply with the law and hopefully this can be the first step in long overdue change that needs to occur in Britney’s life.
“Hopefully, she can get the help and support she needs during this difficult time. Her boys are going to be spending time with her. Her loved ones are going to come up with an overdue needed plan to set her up for success for well being.”
Over the weekend, Britney returned to Instagram for the first time since entering rehab, posting footage of herself and her son, as well as an old clip of her dancing at her home from a year earlier.
She also posted a graphic with the slogan: “Your energy is magnetic, goddess.”
Politics
Pussycat Dolls Cancel American Leg Of World Tour Due To Low Ticket Sales
The Pussycat Dolls have announced they’ll no longer be moving forward with the planned American leg of their world tour.
Back in March, it was confirmed that the chart-topping girl group would be reuniting as a three-piece for a string of shows that would take them across North America and Europe, concluding with a run of performances around the UK and Ireland.
However, following poor sales for their shows in the US and Canada, the group announced on Monday night that they’d had to make a tough decision.
“We want to share an important update with you,” they began. “When we announced the PCD Forever Tour, we hoped to bring the show to fans across the world.
“After taking an honest look at the North American run, we’ve made the difficult and heartbreaking decision to cancel all but one of the North America dates.”
While a one-off performance at WeHo Pride in Los Angeles is still going ahead in June, the PCD Forever tour will officially now kick off in Copenhagen, Denmark in September.
“Our UK and European dates are still moving forward as planned,” the band insisted, pointing out that the “response has been incredible, with several shows already sold out”.
They added: “We are putting everything into making this show a true celebration of the music and the memories, for the fans who have been with us from the beginning and those discovering us for the first time.“We’re working hard to create the kind of show we’ve always dreamed of bringing to you. We cannot wait to bring this reunion to Europe and make these nights unforgettable.”
The current line-up of the Pussycat Dolls consists of Ashley Roberts, Kimberley Wyatt and frontwoman Nicole Scherzinger.
Former band member Carmit Bachar recently admitted she was disappointed to not be invited back for the planned reunion.
Meanwhile, Jessica Sutta – who now describes herself as a “mommy, wife and activist”, and is outspoken in her pro-MAGA and anti-vaccine stances – also insisted that while she was “never planning to return” to the Pussycat Dolls “under the current circumstances”, and is “still unable to dance due to ongoing health issues”, the reunion announcement still proved “difficult” for her.
Politics
Zack Polanskis Popularity Drops After Golders Green Incident
Zack Polanski’s popularity has plummeted in the wake of the row over his reaction to the Golders Green attacks.
The Green Party leader was forced to apologise after appearing to criticise the police’s response to the incident.
Shilome Rand, 34, and Moshe Shine, 76, were left seriously injured in what police have described as a terrorist incident last Wednesday.
A video of the incident posted showed Metropolitan Police apprehending the man suspected of carrying out the attacks.
Polanski retweeted a post on X which said: “So essentially [Met commissioner Mark Rowley’s] officers were repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head when he was already incapacitated by taser.”
That led to criticism from Rowley, who wrote to Polanski condemning “observers with little experience of policing in the real world” for criticising his officers.
Polling released by More in Common on Tuesday – two days before voters go to the polls in crucial elections across the UK – showed the Green Party leader’s approval rating has fallen by 14 points to minus 27 in the past week.
It means he now has a lower rating than Kemi Badenoch, Ed Davey and Nigel Farage, though remains comfortably ahead of Keir Starmer, who is by far the least popular leader with an approval rating of minus 45.
Responding to the findings, More in Common director Luke Tryl said the row was making some people “think twice” about voting Green.
He said: “Two things have happened. Zack Polanski’s negatives have gone up but some people, particularly younger people, have moved to being neutral about him.
“The Greens are seen as a hopeful party, quite a nice party. I just think that what some of the candidates have said about antisemitism and Zack perhaps not being robust enough on that, and responding in the way he did to the police, is making some people think twice.”
However, despite the row, the Greens are still forecast to gain round 600 English council seats in Thursday’s elections.
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
No Mow May: 6 Benefits Of A Wilder Garden
Good news for tired gardeners: no-mow May is upon us.
Experts like Monty Don recommend leaving our strimmers and mowers in the shed this month – even as late as the end of June – and letting our gardens grow wild instead.
Here are 13 bee-rilliant (sorry) reasons to lay down the blades:
1) Dandelions are brilliant for bees
Because of their open shape, bees find it really easy to extract much-needed pollen from yellow dandelions.
Calling the so-called “weed” our “most undervalued wildflower,” the Scottish Wildlife Trust added they also fuel other pollinators like butterflies, hover flies, day flying moths and solitary bees.
2) Longer grass provides much-needed shelter
The Wildlife Trust for Lancashire, Manchester and Merseyside said that long grass is important for invertebrates, like insects, that “in turn provide food for birds and mammals such as hedgehogs″.
Additionally, some species, like craneflies and sawflies, which rely on longer grass to flourish, are “particularly important for the survival of young chicks”.
The common meadow brown butterfly lays its eggs in taller grass clumps, too.
3) It could help to absorb carbon
Speaking to The Yorkshire Wildlife Trust, wildlife gardener Jack Wallington explained that “Wilder lawns are probably the most sustainable usable surface people can create because they absorb carbon as they grow”.
The Royal Horticultural Society added that “when you stop weekly mowing, your lawn starts on its journey to becoming natural grassland – one of the world’s most efficient carbon sinks, able to lock up over three tonnes of carbon per hectare”.
4) It can make gardening easier
Yes, of course, you’re already down one task: mowing. But speaking to HuffPost UK previously, Helen Bostock, a senior wildlife specialist at the Royal Horticultural Society (RHS), said that letting your garden grow wild can make it more self-sufficient.
“A vibrant garden ecosystem is one that requires [fewer] inputs from gardeners – when natural predators are keeping the aphids in check, [fewer] sprays are needed,” she shared.
“It is also more productive – when insect pollinators are in abundance, our fruit trees will set heavier, higher quality fruit.”
5) It can help to restore the UK’s dying grassland meadows
Plantlife, the organisation that invented No Mow May, did so in response to the UK losing 97% of its grassland meadows since the 1930s.
Letting your lawn breathe increases its biodiversity and number of wildflowers.
6) No-mow May can look however you want it to
Not only is it adaptable to a range of environments (native wildflowers flourish in “poor” soil), but it can suit all different needs, too.
If you need to keep a path or verge clear, that’s OK: it’s not an “all or nothing” policy.
The RHS said that “You can ‘no mow’ your whole lawn or just part of it. Leave it long until at least August for maximum wildlife benefit.”
Politics
Zoe Kravitz Swerves Harry Styles Engagement Rumours At The Met Gala
With speculation mounting about whether or not she and Harry Styles are engaged, Zoë Kravitz had a fun way of keeping the rumours at bay while attending this year’s Met Gala.
Zoë and Harry were first linked in the press in the summer of 2025, and found themselves at the centre of even more rumours last month, when the Big Little Lies star was pictured wearing what appeared to be an especially eye-catching engagement ring.
Following this, People magazine cited an undisclosed “source” who claimed the couple had told a “small circle” around them that they were engaged after around eight months of dating.
Since then, both she and the As It Was singer have kept schtum about the rumours, and – perhaps sensing it could be a moment on the Met Ball red carpet, decided to take matters into her own hands.
Or, rather, her own hand. Because Zoë’s Met Gala look for 2026 consisted of a black lace dress boasting both pockets and long sleeves, so she spent the whole night posing with her left hand completely obscured.

In other words, photographers couldn’t get a shot of what may or may not have been an engagement ring (although pictures taken from inside the event showed that she was not wearing the ring in question for the event).
Zoë has previously dated Penn Badgley and Karl Glusman.
She previously directed in the film Blink Twice, and was engaged to co-star Channing Tatum between 2023 and 2024.
Meanwhile, Harry has previously been linked to a number of famous faces, including Olivia Wilde, Taylor Russell, Olivia Dean and Taylor Swift.

Earlier this year, Harry told Apple Music’s Zane Lowe while promoting his latest album Kiss All The Time. Disco, Occasionally: “I had a real honest conversation with myself about, ‘OK, in five years, what do I want my life to look like?’. And then how do I make changes to aim at that?
“I want to have great friendships with people. I want a family. I want these things. It just allowed me to go like, ‘Okay, what do I have to do to create space to allow these things to happen? I can’t just expect them to just happen to me’.”
Politics
The House Opinion Article | Recipes for disaster: the Granita pact

Granita restaurant facade
4 min read
Politicians making a meal of it. This week: a fateful dinner in Islington
The only thing that everyone agrees about the Granita pact is that, whatever it was, it wasn’t negotiated at Granita. In May 1994, the Islington restaurant was the site of one of the most famous, and disputed, meals in British politics. Two and a half weeks earlier the Labour Party’s leader, John Smith, had died of a heart attack. Now two of the favourite candidates to succeed him, shadow home secretary Tony Blair and shadow chancellor Gordon Brown, were meeting to decide which of them would stand aside in favour of the other.
The deal had two outcomes: first, Blair went on to lead his party to three election victories, while Brown became a chancellor who would dominate domestic policy for a decade; more dangerously for their partnership, it left a festering sore between the two men about what exactly each had promised the other.
The Granita restaurant, which served theatregoers and north Londoners who fancied a bit of Eastern Mediterranean sophistication, has now closed, and even its Wikipedia page has been deleted. But the bitterness over what happened that night remains, certainly if Brown’s memoirs are anything to go by.
The meeting in the restaurant was actually the last of a series of conversations between the pair in London and Edinburgh. They’d long agreed that only one of them should stand for any leadership vacancy, to avoid splitting the modernising vote. For all of that time, Brown had assumed that the one would be him, and for much of that time Blair had agreed. In the years before Smith’s death, his view had changed, but he’d seen no point in mentioning this to Brown, his closest friend in politics.
If the Brownite narrative is one of scheming and betrayal, the Blairite one is of a man trying to let his friend down easily. Blair didn’t just want Brown to step aside, he wanted him to be able to do it with dignity. In this telling, the meetings were about helping Brown to understand that he lacked the support to win. If Brown accepted that then, he certainly doesn’t now, as his memoirs make clear. Published in 2017, they show he still believes he was outmanoeuvred by Blair and cheated of the top job that was rightfully his. Nevertheless, he’d already told his team that he wouldn’t stand when he walked into the restaurant.
With him that evening was Ed Balls. “I could tell from the moment we walked in that it was not his type of place,” he wrote in his own memoir. “‘What exactly is polenta?’ he asked me gruffly.” It’s not clear what Balls’ function was there beyond explaining the menu, and he left when the starters arrived. Brown clearly didn’t eat much: afterwards he returned to Westminster for steak and chips.
The bitterness over what happened that night remains, certainly if Brown’s memoirs are anything to go by
With him he took an agreement about the shape of policy under the government that the pair would form, but he took something else, too: the belief that Blair had promised to step aside after two terms and endorse Brown as his successor. Blair’s account of this is cloudy. Certainly it doesn’t dispel the idea that just as he’d allowed Brown to believe things about which of them would run for leader, he now allowed him to believe things about the future.
The Granita dinner exposed flaws in both its participants. Brown comes out of it as a man who misunderstood his own position and bears deep grudges. But he would not, by some distance, be the last person to leave a meeting with Blair under the impression that they’d been promised something they hadn’t.
Politics
BB Cs Jeremy Bowen Criticises Trumps Iran Bombing Decision
Donald Trump is now paying the price of going to war with Iran “without thinking through the consequences”, a senior BBC journalist has declared.
Jeremy Bowen, the corporation’s international affairs editor, also warned that the US president’s attempts to re-open the Strait of Hormuz could see a return to all-out war.
His comments came as Iran’s foreign minister warned that America could be “dragged back into quagmire”.
Trump launched “Project Freedom” at the weekend, vowing that the United States would “guide” stranded ships through the Strait, which has been effectively closed by Iranian attacks since the war began.
That has led to a spike in oil prices and triggered fears of a global economic crisis.
Two US-flagged ships are reported to have passed through the key waterway.
However, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – a Gulf ally of the US – said a tanker affiliated with its state-owned oil company, had been targeted by two drones as it transited the Strait.
On Radio 4′s Today programme, Jeremy Bowen said “Iran was always going to react” to Trump’s plan and warned that it could lead to the collapse of the uneasy ceasefire which has been in place in recent weeks.
“The question is does it end there, or does it slide both of them back into all-out war,” he said.
“This is territory for misperceptions and miscalculations which have been made, and these are the factors which are classic ways of driving the ways that wars escalate, even out of ceasefires.
“The length of time that the Strait of Hormuz stay closed will determine how much more severe this becomes for all of us, as well as the Gulf states.
“You heard President Trump, as ever, being very bullish, but what is happening is [the Gulf states] are seeing the consequences of going to war, assuming an easy victory and without thinking through the consequences of what happens and what to do if it turns out, as has occurred, that it’s not easy.”
Subscribe to Commons People, the podcast that makes politics easy. Every week, Kevin Schofield and Kate Nicholson unpack the week’s biggest stories to keep you informed. Join us for straightforward analysis of what’s going on at Westminster.
Politics
It's showtime for Trump's revenge tour. Will he win?
President Donald Trump’s power as the GOP’s kingmaker faces a major test with this month’s primaries. So far, he’s on rocky footing.
His revenge tour kicks off Tuesday in Indiana, as he tries to oust eight Republican state legislators who blocked his redistricting effort there. Then it moves on to Louisiana and Kentucky, where he’s backing challengers to two longtime enemies, Sen. Bill Cassidy and Rep. Thomas Massie, who he’s been itching to unseat for years. Trump has also selected his favorite candidates in the crowded GOP primaries for Alabama Senate and Georgia governor.
But his picks have struggled to dominate their fields, with most holding only narrow leads in polling and some failing to pull far ahead in fundraising. In Indiana, even a few allies of the president are tempering expectations of a full eight-lawmaker sweep.
The results will reveal how effective the president’s political operation is at turning out Republicans when Trump is not on the ballot, and how motivated MAGA is to go along with his ongoing retribution campaign. It’s also a potent expression of his power ahead of the likely lame-duck phase of his presidency.
Some Republicans — even those involved in the races — say the shaky standing of Trump’s preferred candidates suggests that his ability to move his base en masse is beginning to slip. MAGA, they note, may be developing a mind of its own as the party begins to look beyond the Trump era.
“He’s hit his max power and now you’re seeing the backside of that power curve,” said former GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger, a frequent target of Trump’s wrath who retired from Congress amid intense backlash for his 2021 vote to impeach the president and a new congressional map that would have left him in a member-on-member primary. “This will be his last competitive election cycle that will have any impact on him. And I think the base is starting to think into the future.”
Trump has a long history of unseating his congressional opponents, backing primary challengers to his critics and wielding his social media platform and his official bully pulpit to create such politically hostile conditions that many of his adversaries simply retire. Republican candidates have long jockeyed — and continue to trip over themselves — for his stamp of approval, hoping not to end up on the wrong side of his anger.
“The Trump endorsement is the most powerful and influential endorsement in the history of American politics,” said White House spokesperson Davis Ingle. “President Trump’s sterling record with his endorsements speaks for itself.”
Still, he’s produced a very mixed track record in contested races. Trump’s candidates have felled some of his biggest foes in GOP primaries, including former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and other Republicans who voted to impeach the president in his first term. But he’s also suffered some high-profile losses; he failed to oust Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and has watched several of his picks fall short in congressional races over the years, including Sen. Luther Strange in Alabama and scandal-plagued Rep. Madison Cawthorn in North Carolina.
Success will be even trickier this cycle: The May contests come as he continues an unpopular war in Iran that’s causing voters pain at the gas pump, as people sour on his economic and immigration agenda and as his approval ratings continue to sink.
“The [Trump] endorsement just isn’t moving voters. It just isn’t,” said a GOP operative working on the Alabama Senate race who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. “When you’ve endorsed more than 800 people in 10 years, the potency of an individual endorsement wanes.”
May 5: Indiana
As the redistricting wars become a defining element of the midterms, Tuesday’s election will illuminate the president’s ability to maintain his grip on the Republican coalition.
While the White House and its allies have deployed the full force of its political operation against eight Indiana legislators — spending nearly $10 million across the races — they’re beginning to downplay the likelihood they will sweep all of them. Critics of the revenge effort say the strategy has been scattered and undisciplined.
How many incumbents survive will be an important piece of evidence predicting how the rest of May will go for the White House.
“We’ve tried to be helpful, as we always are, with our colleagues that are incumbents right now and will continue to be,” Rodric Bray, Indiana’s Senate President Pro Tempore who led the charge against Trump’s redistricting push, told POLITICO. “The challenge, of course, is that money matters in politics. When $9 million is spent, that has a huge impact, and we’ll see what the result is.”
May 16: Louisiana
Trump-backed Rep. Julia Letlow is struggling to dominate the polls in her primary challenge to unseat Cassidy, who earned MAGA’s ire for voting to convict Trump on impeachment charges in 2021. The latest Emerson College poll shows Letlow locked in a close three-way race, with her at 27 percent, State Treasurer John Fleming at 28 percent and Cassidy at 21 percent. Nearly 1 in 4 likely GOP primary voters are undecided.
Letlow entered the race at Trump’s urging. She boasts endorsements from Louisiana’s GOP Gov. Jeff Landry and national groups like the Make America Healthy Again PAC, which has promised $1 million in support like distributing mailers — a needed financial boost given her middling war chest compared with Cassidy’s.
But Trump has not sent the calvary for Letlow, withholding his own war chest and not making any trips to Louisiana on her behalf. The president recently doubled down on his campaign against Cassidy, telling GOP primary voters to kick the incumbent “OUT OF OFFICE” — but Trump notably did not name-drop Letlow or urge voters to back her.
May 19: Kentucky, Alabama and Georgia
Trump faces two very different tests of his influence in Kentucky, where he is simultaneously boosting Rep. Andy Barr as retiring Sen. Mitch McConnell’s successor and pushing to oust a longtime thorn in his side in Massie.
The president waded in late for Barr, endorsing the representative less than three weeks before the primary while also offering one of his two rivals, businessman Nate Morris, a job in his administration — a move that could help propel Barr past former Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron.
But it is Massie’s 4th District race that may prove more troublesome for Trump. The president finally fronted a challenger to the renegade Republican after Massie voted against the party’s signature tax-and-spending package last year, and Trump’s allies have now poured over $10 million into sinking the incumbent.
So far, Massie has withstood the onslaught. He leads his rival, former Navy SEAL Ed Gallrein, in polling, fundraising and name ID. One recent survey showed half of likely voters in his deep-red district with a libertarian bent preferred an independent-minded lawmaker, compared to 37 percent who wanted a strong Trump supporter.
Massie, who threads that needle by saying he’s with Trump “91 percent of the time,” argues that supporting him and the president aren’t “mutually exclusive things.” And he thinks the Trump-directed flood of outside money against him has its limits.
“If outside billionaires spend millions of dollars, they can change somebody’s profile,” Massie said in a recent interview. “But I think what they’re going to find out is that my brand is established well enough … that [they] can persuade some of the people, but they’re not going to be able to persuade enough of them.”
The president isn’t being driven by revenge in Alabama. But even there, his chosen candidate is battling to break through a crowded GOP primary field for Senate: The Trump-backed Rep. Barry Moore has a slight lead in public polling, while Attorney General Steve Marshall, who has been in office for nearly a decade, is holding his own.
Meanwhile in Georgia, Trump’s backing of Lt. Gov. Burt Jones’ gubernatorial run is a rebuke of Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who rose to national prominence by defying the president’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election and is himself running for governor.
Still, Trump’s endorsement has its limits: Rick Jackson, a health care executive, has a slight lead over Jones in most polls for the GOP primary as he also makes a play for the MAGA base. He’s been pummelling the lieutenant governor with millions spent on attack ads.
“If any other candidate had received that amount of negative, they would be polling within the margin of error of zero,” said a Georgia-based Republican strategist who is unaffiliated with any candidate and was granted anonymity to speak openly. “When you’re looking at the reasons why [Jones] is now in a toss-up race, I would say the President’s endorsement is by far the top reason why.”
As both Jackson and Jones compete for the same slice of voters, some Republicans see Jones’ inability to dominate the race as evidence of Trump’s waning influence.
“It’s not just Donald Trump — Georgia candidates historically have not benefited very much from endorsements from out-of-state celebrities,” said Jason Shepherd, former Cobb County GOP Chair.
May 26: Texas run-off
After Sen. John Cornyn finished ahead of Attorney General Ken Paxton in Texas’ March primary, Republicans in Washington were on standby for Trump’s expected endorsement. It never came.
Perhaps in the clearest example of MAGA beginning to make decisions without Trump’s explicit approval, Texas Republicans have rallied around the scandal-plagued Paxton. Polling now shows that a Trump endorsement for Cornyn, at this point, likely wouldn’t sway voters significantly — and Paxton would maintain his edge.
GOP Texas consultant Vinny Minchillo that if Trump does decide to weigh in, he “will have to sell this to the faithful and tell them exactly what to do. Especially if he endorses Cornyn.”
Trump’s endorsement still matters, he said, but “less so with each day that passes.”
-
Business7 days agoMost Commercial Energy Audits Miss the Real Losses
-
Fashion7 days agoKylie Jenner’s KHY Enters a New Era with ‘Born in LA’
-
NewsBeat2 days agoChannel 5 – All Creatures Great and Small series 7 new post
-
Tech4 days agoTrump’s 25% EU auto tariff breaches Turnberry Agreement that also covers semiconductors and digital trade
-
Sports4 days agoPaul Scholes issues Marcus Rashford reality check as agreement emerges over Man United star
-
Crypto World7 days agoCFTC’s AI will review U.S. crypto registration applications, chairman tells CoinDesk
-
Business6 days agoBarclay Brothers Avoid Bankruptcy: HSBC Drops High Court Petitions After IVA Deal
-
Business6 days agoTesla Officially Registers Elon Musk’s Stock: What Investors Need to Know
-
Tech7 days agoGet Ready for More Brain-Scanning Consumer Gadgets
-
Business5 days agoTwo Powerball Tickets Split $143 Million Jackpot in Indiana and Kansas
-
Tech6 days agoTexas Instruments made a new flagship graphing calculator: the TI-84 Evo
-
Crypto World5 days ago
CoreWeave (CRWV) Stock Climbs 8% Despite $45M Insider Share Dump
-
Business2 days agoWinning Numbers Drawn as Jackpot Resets to $20 Million
-
Crypto World6 days agoSecuritize and Computershare Enable Tokenized Equity Issuance for Over 25,000 U.S.-Listed Stocks
-
Crypto World6 days agoGibraltar Proposes Tokenized Funds Regulation to Bolster Compliance
-
Entertainment5 days agoCelebrities Who Are Attending the 2026 Met Gala Event
-
Business6 days agoAlexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (ARE) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript
-
Entertainment5 days agoInsider Claims Reason Behind Key & Peele Split
-
Fashion3 days agoMary J. Blige Vegas Residency Looks: Crystal-Embellished Fjolla Haxhismajli, Todd Fisher, and More!
-
Tech5 days agoOfficial SAP npm packages compromised to steal credentials

You must be logged in to post a comment Login