According to the latest poll from YouGov, the Green Party are in second place when it comes to the predicted seat count. Labour, meanwhile, have dropped to sixth:

‼️POLL | Reform lead by 5pts

➡️ Ref: 24% (=)
🔵 Con: 19% (=)
🟢 Grn: 18% (+2)
🔴 Lab: 17% (+1)
🟠 Lib: 13% (=)
⬛️ Res: 4% (=)
🟥 YP: 0% (-1)

— Seats —
➡️ Ref: 282
🟢 Grn: 91
🔵 Con: 83
🟠 Lib: 81
🟡 SNP: 47
🔴 Lab: 34

Poll: @YouGov, 12-13 Apr (+/- vs 7 Apr) pic.twitter.com/m0PQxoBh26

Advertisement

— Stats for Lefties 🍉🏳️‍⚧️ (@LeftieStats) April 14, 2026

This puts Labour below all of the major national parties; it also puts them below the Scotland-specific SNP.

The hard work of the thousands of Green Party members is paying off.

Every conversation we have makes a difference.

Lower Bills. Protect the NHS. Keep us out of US wars. https://t.co/VsT4LXJ8rp

Advertisement

— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) April 14, 2026

New danger for Starmer’s Labour

The above polling is interesting for a few reasons.

Firstly, we’re now well past the point where Reform look capable of forming a majority government. At the same time, they would be placed to form a coalition with the Tories. This is something we all know they’d jump at given how many Tories they’ve accepted into the party.

Secondly, the centrist and left-leaning parties would fall short of being able to form a government even if the Greens, Lib Dems, SNP, and Labour joined forces. This is not good. It’s especially not good because despite the four parties’ seat share being below that of Reform and the Tories, their vote share is higher – i.e. more voters would have voted for them.

Thirdly, Your Party are on track to get three seats despite having less than 1% of the vote share. The three seats represent an increase of three despite their overall vote share dropping. Your Party have certainly had a chaotic fortnight with many members resigning in protest at the recent ‘purge’ motion, so it will be interesting to see how things look a week from now.

Fourthly, as ever, the above shows what a mess our current voting system is. Ideally, you’d want the number of seats to reflect each party’s vote share. Instead, we get stuff like the following:

• Only Reform sitting in a seat share position which matches their vote share.
• Reform on track to win close to half the seats despite only having 24% of the vote share.
• Restore getting zero seats despite having 4% of the vote share.

Ignoring all the above, it’s important to remember that polls are just a snapshot of the current moment. Things could change dramatically in a general election. And as we keep saying, it’s definitely the Green Party who have the momentum – not to mention the right answers to most of the days big questions (although we have criticised their stance on Zionism).

Reform UK do not have momentum.

The only party with momentum in the UK right now is the Green Party. https://t.co/wx92kcIIFf pic.twitter.com/FsDeLEigh8

— thelefttake (@thelefttake) April 14, 2026

Advertisement

Proportional Representation

Make Vote Matters write the following about proportional representation:

Proportional Representation is any voting system in which the share of seats a party wins matches the share of votes it receives. There are many different systems of Proportional Representation, but they all aim to make sure seats match votes.

The UK currently uses the primitive First Past the Post voting system – which causes severe problems for voters, our politics and our society. From its definition alone, it’s easy to see how Proportional Representation solves the problems of First Past the Post.

‘First Past the Post’ is how we ended up with a century of Conservative-Labour dominance. For the past forty years, this allowed the two parties to offer little besides reheated Thatchernomics, as they knew voters had nowhere else to go.

Make Votes Matter also said:

Proportional Representation (PR) could potentially revolutionize the UK’s political landscape by ensuring that each party’s share of seats in Parliament aligns more closely with the proportion of votes they receive nationwide. Under such a system, smaller parties would have a greater chance of representation, breaking the dominance of the two-party system.

This is outdated now, of course, because the two-party system has already broken down. Our voting system still needs to catch up, but voters just don’t care anymore.

They’re sick of the neoliberal Labour and Tories, and now they’re voting for whoever they like – voting system be damned.

Momentum

Looking at YouGov’s voting tracker, it isn’t the first time the Greens have polled higher than Labour:

The Greens overtaking Labour was unthinkable a year ago.

Now we know it’s possible, we need to think bigger.

Featured image via Stats for Lefties / Barold

(Alamy)

4 min read13 min

In a letter sent to Shabana Mahmood this week, Freedom from Torture, Médecins Sans Frontières UK, Doctors of the World UK, The Helen Bamber Foundation and the British Medical Association (BMA) warned that reducing the period of leave granted to recognised refugees in the UK would have an “unintended but undoubtedly harmful impact”.

It comes as the NHS continues to report record numbers of people contacting the service for mental health support. 

The Home Office announced last year that refugee status would be temporary and subject to review every 30 months for all adults claiming asylum.

It was part of the Labour government’s broader efforts to deter illegal immigration, inspired by what Mahmood has described as the success of Denmark’s approach to reducing arrivals.

The government has also extended the automatic qualifying period for awarding Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) from five to 10 years. 

Mahmood and supportive Labour MPs argue that reducing immigration is key to taking on Nigel Farage’s Reform UK and improving their party’s prospects at the next general election.

In a speech last month, the Home Secretary said that Britain is more attractive than other countries in Europe for those seeking refugee status, and warned her party that the system in its current form is “eroding trust” with the public.

“For those who come to this country and want to contribute to our national life, I am clear they should have a path to settlement and ultimately citizenship. But it is essential that the privilege of living in this country is earned, not automatic,” she said.

However, the changes have attracted criticism from other parts of the party, including former deputy leader Angela Rayner and shadow cabinet minister Emily Thornberry, who wrote in The House last week that reforms to IRL are “the opposite of fairness”. Over 100 Labour MPs signed a letter organised by backbencher Tony Vaughan expressing concern about the policy.

Now, a letter, sent by the coalition of organisations, seen by PoliticsHome, has warned that the proposals would “strip torture survivors and other refugees of long-term legal protection and the stability they need to recover from past traumas, leading to further, avoidable distress and mental health deterioration”.

Refugees often “fled serious trauma” and, as a result, “a sense of stability is crucial for their subsequent recovery”, it warned ministers.

“It will introduce major and prolonged uncertainty into the lives of already vulnerable and marginalised people, and cause a continual associated fear of having their status revoked and being returned to the hands of their persecutors.”

The letter also said that it is “unclear” whether the Home Office has the resources needed to implement the changes “efficiently, including conducting periodic reviews of refugees’ status”.

“For those who have lost so much during their flight from persecution, the anxiety that they will be unable to extend their leave can be terrifying, retraumatising, and can undermine progress towards recovery.”

“By introducing further instability into the lives of refugee patients, a reduced period of protection leave has the potential to increase mental health needs, which will only place further pressure on over-stretched NHS mental health and specialist trauma rehabilitation services,” it said.

A Home Office spokesperson told PoliticsHome: “Genuine refugees will find safety in Britain. Protection will be renewed for all those refugees who still face danger in their own country, but we must reduce incentives that draw people here at such scale, including those without a legitimate need for protection.

“So, once a refugee’s home is safe and they are able to return, they will be expected to do so.

“Refugees will also be able to obtain greater certainty about their future in the UK by switching into the Protection Work and Study route.”

After the corruption of Morgan McSweeney’s Labour Together operation, a new Starmer-linked ‘think tank’ has been popping up on X timelines. Introducing ‘Labour Future’: an account with only 7000 followers, but whose paid ads receive millions of views.

Those viewing figures suggest thousands of pounds in expenditure, but as with other Labour Party-affiliated lobby groups, the source of Labour Future’s funding seems unclear. But its board is broadly affiliated with the Israeli lobby, and even includes a former IOF solider.

Demanding loyalty

The X ads demand loyalty to the ailing Keir Starmer, the most unpopular Prime Minister in recorded history. They also call for an end to “anonymous briefings against your own leader”.

However, Labour Party sources have not been limited to criticising the Starmer administration off the record. After giving a fiery interview to Jody McIntyre on 26 March, Labour MP Karl Turner was summarily suspended from the party within days, despite having been a member since the age of 13.

Like Morgan McSweeney’s outfit, Labour Future operates as a limited company. ‘Labour Future Limited’, which a Labour spokesperson once claimed had no affiliation to the party, was dissolved in 2022. It was reborn as ‘Labour Future (2025) Limited’ last August. Their director is sitting Labour councillor Brendan Chilton, but their advisory council includes a key McSweeney ally.

Maurice Glasman and the Labour Together network

Maurice Glasman, who once described Morgan McSweeney as ‘one of ours’, now sits on the four-man advisory council of Labour Future.

Glasman also joined Labour Together in its early days, working alongside the former Labour MP Jon Cruddas to attract initial funding from Trevor Chinn and Martin Taylor. Now housing minister Steve Reed, a long-time parliamentary supporter of Labour Friends of Israel (LFI), was introduced to the two lobbyists through Glasman and Cruddas, who were already receiving money for their ‘Blue Labour’ project.

As well as providing financial impetus, Chinn went on to serve as a director of Labour Together alongside McSweeney. He also made a personal £50,000 contribution to Keir Starmer’s 2020 leadership campaign. Chinn admitted that he ‘had great concerns about the election of an outspoken opponent of the Jewish state as Labour leader’, and was happy to back McSweeney’s preferred successor to Jeremy Corbyn.

When McSweeney was caught concealing over £730,000 in donations to Labour Together, the decision was attributed, at least in part, to protecting Chinn’s identity as the pressure group’s ‘great benefactor’.

As well as Maurice Glasman, Labour Future’s advisory council includes MPs Graham Stringer (another parliamentary supporter of Labour Friends of Israel) and Tris Osborne.

Epstein connections

In 2024, Glasman collaborated with his old Labour Together colleagues, LFI veteran Jon Cruddas and fellow Blue Labour devotee Jonathan Rutherford, to launch a ‘Future of the Left’ project.

The project was sponsored by Policy Exchange – another think tank that refuses to identify most of its donors. At times, however, Policy Exchange has acknowledged funders within its reports. One notes the ‘generous support’ of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, for example.

Bill Gates is reported to have ‘discussed the Gates Foundation and philanthropy’ with notorious paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. As with many of Epstein’s associates, Gates now says that he ‘regrets’ the relationship. Epstein’s ‘best pal’, Labour Party grandee Peter Mandelson, was a long time mentor and ally of Morgan McSweeney.

The Mandelson scandal eventually led to McSweeney’s resignation, but Labour Together continues to operate.

Former IOF solider joins board

Labour Together’s board now includes Jonathan Kestenbaum. In November 2010, a single paragraph in the Jewish Chronicle described Kestenbaum as ‘an ex-IDF soldier [and] holder of the Israel army’s “outstanding soldier award”‘, but the claim has never been repeated since.

Kestenbaum is also noted as ‘a former mazkir of Bnei Akiva’ – the international Zionist youth movement. On the website of their UK branch, Bnei Akiva define their ideology as ‘a religious Zionist worldview, actively seeking to be involved in the development of Medinat Yisrael [the State of Israel].’

Most evidence of Jonathan Kestenbaum’s time in the IDF seemed to have been scrubbed from the internet. There had been no mention of his military service on his Wikipedia page until I published my research on X on 13 April, having previously jumped straight from his time at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem to his return to the UK.

I did, however, find one source still available online: a 1989 article in the academic Journal of Palestine. The issue includes stories taken from the Israeli press, one of which is a series of ‘entries from the diary of a young Israeli soldier in the West Bank during the intifadah‘, which had been published in the September 24th 1988 international edition of the Jerusalem Post.

Jonathan Kestenbaum is described as an ‘IDF reservist’, and his diary excerpts are preceded an introduction describing how:

Kestenbaum … and his colleagues were not prepared for were the moral questions posed by service in the administered territories, although they were taught how to use clubs and tear gas.

Kestenbaum also describes ‘a policy of humiliation’ defined by ‘moments of arbitrary violence and excesses perpetrated by junior officers, enjoying unexpected power.’

‘Britain’s most active pro-Israeli lobbying organisation’

Kestenbaum was nominated to the House of Lords by the Labour Party’s leadership in 2010, following a seven-year stint as a director of the pro-Israeli lobby group BICOM.

BICOM were described in 2009 as “Britain’s most active pro-Israeli lobbying organisation”. At the time, the Guardian reported on BICOM’s approach:

Foreign reporters are bombarded with press releases and invitations to interview senior Israeli ministers and advisors at top London restaurants. Set up in 2001, it has regularly flown journalists to Tel Aviv.

BICOM was founded by billionaire Poju Zabludowicz. Zabludowic inherited much of his wealth from his father Shlomo, ‘an arms dealer who made a fortune out of his close relations with the Israeli state.’ Former BICOM employees include Labour peer Ruth Smeeth and Luke Akehurst donor Lee Petar. Convicted fraudster Gerald Ronson and Wes Streeting donor David Menton have both funded the group.

The Israeli ambassadors

Labour Together’s Jonathan Kestenbaum has a cosy relationship with former Israeli ambassador Ron Prosor; leaked correspondence between the pair revealed an email with the subject line ‘From London with love’. By 2016, Kestenbaum was attempting to secure a job at oil company BP for Prosor, who he described as an ‘exceptional asset’.

A further set of leaked diaries revealed that in September 2024, Kestenbaum visited the residence of then Israeli ambassador Tzipi Hotovely for brunch. Hotovely’s diaries also revealed meetings with Stuart Roden, another Labour Party donor. Last January, Roden gave Labour Together £100,000.

RIT Capital Partners

From 2008-22, Kestenbaum was Chief Operating Officer at RIT Capital Partners, formerly known as the Rothschild Investment Trust. RIT’s founder, Jacob Rothschild, was the chair of the family’s Israel-based Yad Hanadiv foundation from 1989 until his death in 2024.

The foundation was ‘instrumental’ in the construction of the Israeli Parliament (Knesset) and Supreme Court buildings, and more recently entered into a partnership with the Israeli government to ‘renew’ the National Library of Israel.

Genie Energy

In 2010, an ‘entity connected to Jacob Rothschild’ purchased a 5% stake in Genie Energy. Jacob was also appointed to the Genie Strategic Advisory Board, alongside media baron Rupert Murdoch and former US vice-president and Halliburton CEO Dick Cheney.

In 2013, the Israeli state awarded Genie Energy exclusive gas and oil exploration rights in a 153-square mile area in the south of the Golan Heights, a Syrian territory illegally occupied by the Israeli state. At the time, an Israeli political analyst told the Financial Times:

This action is mostly political – it’s an attempt to deepen Israeli commitment to the occupied Golan Heights.

United Jewish Israel Appeal

Kestenbaum also previously served as chief executive of the United Jewish Israel Appeal (UJIA) charity. UJIA’s website declares ‘decades of experience in sending young Jews in the UK to Israel on rite of passage programmes’, which have previously included stays in illegal settlements. Trevor Chinn is president of the UJIA.

Labour Together may be attempting a rebrand in the post-McSweeney era, but their ties to the Israel lobby endure.

Labour MP Samantha Niblett, 46, wants to fight against societal stigma around sex (Samantha Niblett)

5 min read21 min

Niblett, who was elected as MP for Derbyshire South in 2024, has secured a debate in Parliament on lifelong sex education in the early autumn.

The MP is working with Cindy Gallop, a sextech entrepreneur and founder of MakeLoveNotPorn, an adult video website that aims to offer an alternative to hardcore pornography.

On Monday, Niblett and Gallop launched a campaign calling for better lifelong, inclusive sex education in the UK to help people understand consent, prevent abuse and violence, and raise awareness of how childbirth, the menopause, stress and other health conditions can impact sexual satisfaction.

In an interview with PoliticsHome, Niblett said she wants to make 2026 the “summer of sex”. 

“It sounds like we’re going on a bit of a tour!” she joked.

“What I am hoping is that by the time we get to summer recess, I have got a whole bank of organisations to visit and speak with and gather information, so we can talk about sex all summer, so that I can help shape that speech for the chamber, but then also we shape our next steps.”

The campaign’s tagline – ‘Yes Sex Please, We’re British!’ – plays on No Sex Please, We’re British, a 1973 British comedy film in which a clerk in a small town bank is horrified when he receives a package containing pornography, rather than a new calculator.

Niblett said she wants the campaign to be about “taking control of our patriotism, about taking control of our Britishness, and not feeling ashamed”.

As part of the campaign, she is hoping to arrange two events before the summer recess, including one where she intends to bring sex toys into Parliament to encourage open conversation about sexual pleasure – though she is currently in conversation with parliamentary security over whether the devices will be allowed onto the estate.

The 46-year-old MP recently met with sexual product retailer Love Honey, and told PoliticsHome that she learned that “as well as making you feel good, [masturbation] is good for your health”, with some medical research showing that it is good for stress and pain relief, menstrual cramps, and reducing the risk of prostate cancer.

For Niblett, the campaign is personal, and she wants to talk more openly about sex herself to encourage others to feel comfortable doing so.

“The first time I remember seeing pornography, I was 10, I saw it on a videotape, I saw it in magazines,” she said.

“And I sometimes wonder, having seen it so young but without being able to talk about it, whether that has shaped the person that I am today. It’s funny, just because I’m doing a campaign on sex education, it’s not because I’m this massively empowered, sexually flamboyant person. I’m not. I wish I were. 

“If I could rewire my brain… It’s not too late, I’m hoping that, actually, this summer of sex is also an education for me.”

She described how the sex education she had at school was “pretty medical”.

“It was all focused on what you shouldn’t do, not what you should do,” she continued.

“Pleasure certainly didn’t play a part in it. And as a girl, you’re just worried about either getting an STD or getting pregnant. I don’t remember talking about contraception much either.”

Niblett said that she has watched porn herself – “like lots of people” – and has recently watched content on Gallop’s MakeLoveNotPorn website, which she said featured “real people who are having messy, funny, intimate, sensual sex together”.

“It’s a turn on, it helps you masturbate, helps you cum,” she said.

“The sections that I always prefer the most are the intimate sections. I am not saying that anybody else’s preferences are wrong, but I think if you’re desensitised to think that some things are normal, it skews your view about what real sex is like with real people who are not acting in a porn film.”

Asked whether she would support the BBC creating and publishing more educational adult content, Niblett said she would “happily” have a conversation with the public broadcaster about the topic. 

Niblett wants to involve Gallop, as well as TV presenter Davina McCall, who has advocated for more open sex education, and relationship expert and presenter Paul Bruson, and various sex education content creators to spread awareness, attend the government’s national summit on the challenges facing men and boys – expected to take place this year – and engage with ministers Alex Davies-Jones and Jess Phillips. 

Davies-Jones and Phillips have both been involved in bringing forward regulations on porn in the Crime and Policing Bill, which is currently making its way through Parliament. The new laws include banning nudity apps and banning the depiction of strangulation in pornography to protect women from violence.

The Labour government has now also agreed to press ahead with a ban on certain types of online pornography, including so-called “barely legal” content depicting adults role-playing as children and some forms of step-incest pornography, following pressure from MPs and defeats in the House of Lords.

While Niblett welcomed the banning of nudification apps, she said that while you can “ban all things and come down on people with a ton of bricks legally”, she wanted to see education used as the “biggest tool”.

On the potential ban on step incest in porn, Niblett said that although she understood the rationale behind it, she could also see why it might be a challenge to implement when step incest is not illegal in the real world. 

“So it’ll be interesting to see what happens with that particular piece of legislation,” she said.

Reflecting on why she wants to fight against societal stigma surrounding sex, Niblett said: “We just need to acknowledge that humans have a natural interest in sex. It’s one of the things that nearly all of us want to do, nearly all of us do.

“It just feels like there is an opportunity to remind people that it is a joyful thing.”