Students from the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) have published a document criticising the university’s greenwashing of corporate capitalism at LSE Festival 2026.

The document, seen by the Canary, takes aim at how the university’s stated ethos diverges from its material investments and corporate practices. This alternative programme was compiled by LSE Students for Justice in Palestine.

It comes in response to LSE’s school-wide festival, beginning 15 June, which will gather economists, academics, policy ministers, journalists, and scientists to speak about the climate crisis, green finance, and ecological governance.

However, student and staff activist researchers in 2024 and 2025 revealed how LSE’s own investment practices contradict its charitable goals and ESG standards.

This year, students write:

…while the institution performs planetary concern on its stages, it holds more than £86 million in investments across the very industries responsible for the climate catastrophe.

As you attend this festival, remember that LSE does not put its money where its mouth is.

LSE’s money isn’t where its mouth is

In May 2024, LSESU’s Palestine Society published Assets in Apartheid, a forensic analysis of LSE’s multi-million pound endowment. In June 2025, it published Stakes in Settler Colonialism, a 228-page update.

The reports’ cumulative findings are clear. LSE holds more than £86 million in companies profiting from the extraction and/or distribution of fossil fuels, including BP (£2.05 million ), Enel (£1.98 million), and Shell (£1.11 million).

Its investment advisor, JP Morgan Chase, is the world’s most prolific financier of fossil fuels, according to the 2025 Banking on Climate Chaos: Fossil Fuel Finance Report. This is who LSE trusts with its money.

Beyond fossil fuels, LSE has investments worth over £71 million in companies profiting from the manufacture and/or proliferation of arms as well as the funding of nuclear weapons.

The university also has at least £72 million in companies profiting from the genocide in Gaza. Those companies are:

• Supplying the Israeli military operating in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT)
• Involved in illegal settlement activities
• Funding the occupation of Palestine

The report explains that:

These are not abstract figures. Every barrel pumped, every missile shipped, and every settlement financed by a company in this portfolio is a decision that LSE’s Finance and Estates Committee has taken, and refuses to reverse.

The students at LSE allege that for the university, “money is more important than lives”.

The university is happily staging a festival about saving the planet while bankrolling its destruction. In doing so, it uses the spectacle of concern to obscure its own material role in ecological breakdown and genocide.

Polluters are the programme

LSE has organised various high-profile speakers, all with loft speech titles, but the students aren’t convinced.

Mon 15 June

The Politics of Climate Change

This is a panel on the “green backlash” and climate rollbacks in recent years. However, students say:

LSE is its own case study: students voted for divestment in 2024, and again in 2026. Management declined to act both times.

The panels are included, but not limited to, ‘Political Economy Analysis for Accelerating the Green Transition,’ ‘How the Right Laws Can Save the Planet,’ and ‘Can We Tackle Climate Change Without Deepening Inequality?’

And, the report authors promise to tackle the problem of opposition from management:

LSE’s administration and its own student body are divided by exactly this failure of cooperation. 89% of students voted for divestment. Management refused. Cooperation, apparently, means something different when the institution is on one side and its students on the other.

Gross institutional hypocrisy on BP

As the students state:

Oil and education don’t mix.

They’re keen to underscore the complicity of BP, to whom LSE directs many millions of pounds. BP is complicit in both ecocide and the Gaza genocide.

LSE has been here before. In 1988, following a two-week student occupation of Connaught House, LSE divested from all 26 of its holdings in companies complicit in South African apartheid, a stake worth £3 million that included investments in BP. It has been done, and can be done again.

However, two years later, in 1990, LSE accepted £1.25 million from BP to establish the BP Centennial Professorship Scheme, designed, in LSE’s own words, to “contribute to the internal education programme of BP and to develop contacts between the School and BP”.

Under this scheme, LSE lends BP the grammar of sustainability, development, and progress. This is the precise language BP uses to greenwash its complicity in climate breakdown whilst the planet burns.

The report authors explain that:

Greenwashing is the practice of deploying the language of environmental responsibility to obscure the reality of environmental harm. It does not require lying. It requires only that the performance of concern be loud enough, and public enough, to crowd out scrutiny of the underlying conduct.

In June 2024, the LSE Student Union held a referendum on divestment from fossil fuels and arms producers. With record turnout, 89% of students voted in favour. In February 2026, the referendum was renewed with similarly overwhelming support.

Both times, LSE management declined to listen to its student body, citing “fiduciary duties”. But, the students allege fiduciary duty is not the neutral, technical constraint that management presents it as. It is a choice about whose interests count and over what timescale.

How to actually save the planet

Students have listed a number of suggestions for LSE to take up:

1. Full divestment from all holdings in fossil fuel companies, and from the asset managers and advisors financing their expansion.

2. Immediate divestment from all companies identified in Assets in Apartheid and Stakes in Settler Colonialism as complicit in crimes against the Palestinian people.

3. Full transparency of LSE’s portfolio. Easy access to view how much money is invested and in which companies.

4. Democratic oversight of the endowment. Students and staff must have binding participation in investment decisions.

5. End the BP Centennial Professorship and all partnerships with BP and other fossil fuel giants.

Until these demands are met, every “How to Save the Planet” panel is an alibi for inaction.

Featured image via the Canary

By Cameron Baillie

Source link

In football, a goalkeeper does not always need to lift the trophy to secure his place in World Cup history. Some have built their legacy by enduring on the world’s biggest football stage, whilst others have forged their legend by keeping a clean sheet against their opponents.

Throughout the history of the World Cup, two distinct paths to immortality have emerged among goalkeepers; the first is measured by the number of matches a goalkeeper has played, and the second by the number of clean sheets he has kept.

World Cup: Hugo Lloris sits top of record books

Over the course of four World Cup appearances, Frenchman Hugo Lloris has become a symbol of consistency and reliability. The goalkeeper, who led his country to the 2018 title and the 2022 final, has become the most-capped goalkeeper in the tournament’s history with 20 appearances.

Lloris’s achievement was no mean feat, as he surpassed names that have been synonymous with World Cup history for decades, foremost among them Germany’s Manuel Neuer (19 appearances), followed by Sepp Maier and Taffarel (18 appearances each).

These figures reflect a value distinct from tournaments and titles; they tell the story of a goalkeeper who has managed to maintain his place among the elite for many years, across successive generations of players and managers.

Goalkeepers with the most World Cup appearances

• Hugo Lloris – France – 20 matches
• Manuel Neuer – Germany – 19 appearances
• Sepp Maier – West Germany – 18 appearances
• Taffarel – Brazil – 18 appearances
• Fabien Barthez – France – 17 appearances
• Peter Shilton – England – 17 appearances
• Iker Casillas – Spain – 17 appearances
• Fernando Muslera – Uruguay – 16 appearances
• Thibaut Courtois – Belgium – 15 appearances
• Gilmar – Brazil – 14 appearances
• Emerson Leão – Brazil – 14 appearances
• Jan Youngbloed – Netherlands – 12 matches

Barthez and Shelton: The kings of clean sheets

Whilst Lloris may have won the battle of endurance, France’s Fabien Barthez and England’s Peter Shilton share the top spot on the list of goalkeepers with the most clean sheets.

Both kept 10 clean sheets at the World Cup, the highest tally in the tournament’s history, setting the standard for resilience under pressure in the biggest competitions.

Just behind the duo is Dutchman Jan Jongbloed, with eight clean sheets from just 12 matches – the best success rate among top goalkeepers – alongside prominent names such as Taffarel, Sepp Maier, Emerson Leão and Hugo Lloris.

Clean sheets are not merely a defensive statistic; they often represent the difference between an early exit and progression to the knockout stages, which explains why most of those with such records feature among the greatest goalkeepers in the history of the game.

Goalkeepers with the most clean sheets

• Fabien Barthez – France – 17 matches – 10 clean sheets
• Peter Shilton – England – 17 matches – 10 clean sheets
• Jan Jongbloed – Netherlands – 12 matches – 8 clean sheets
• Emerson Liao – Brazil – 14 matches – 8 clean sheets
• Sepp Maier – West Germany – 18 matches – 8 clean sheets
• Taffarel – Brazil – 18 matches – 8 clean sheets
• Hugo Lloris – France – 20 matches – 8 clean sheets
• Gilmar – Brazil – 14 matches – 7 clean sheets
• Thibaut Courtois – Belgium – 15 matches – 7 clean sheets
• Fernando Muslera – Uruguay – 16 appearances – 7 clean sheets
• Iker Casillas – Spain – 17 matches – 7 clean sheets
• Manuel Neuer – Germany – 19 matches – 7 clean sheets

Two sides to goalkeeping greatness

Although the criteria differ, some names have managed to combine both. Hugo Lloris not only holds the record for the number of appearances, but also ranks among the goalkeepers with the most clean sheets. The same applies to Manuel Neuer, Tavaril and Sepp Maier.

Whilst the record of appearances tells the story of staying at the top, the list of clean sheets tells the story of the ability to keep the dream alive. Between these two stories lies the legacy of the goalkeepers who have left their mark on World Cup history — not through the goals they scored, but through the goals they prevented.

Featured image via Agustin Cuevas/ Getty Images

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

Tommy Robinson has, once again, been promoting the far-right uprisings spreading across the UK. He tweeted:

The whole of the United Kingdom is hitting the streets tonight at 7pm following yet another invader attack on our people.

It's time pic.twitter.com/tscckc9ceK

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026

Tommy Robinson: from Russia with hate

Following Robinson’s calls to rise up, riots erupted in Belfast. The city was earlier the scene of an attempted murder involving a Sudanese man. And once again, we saw the right cynically using a horrific crime to drive racial tensions:

Crime is now being viewed through an entirely racialised lens – but only when the perpetrators aren't white.

When Chas Corrigan stabbed a Saudi student to death, or Paul Doyle mowed down Liverpool fans, white people didn't have to fear being a target of collective retaliation.

— Ash Sarkar (@AyoCaesar) June 10, 2026

Robinson revelled in the violent acts which followed his call to action:

Belfast is out. pic.twitter.com/nHZ7GURRRA

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026

Belfast is burning.

Britain's politicians have failed us all. pic.twitter.com/MDqnFKoQCB

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026

Roads blocked by burning vehicles in Northern Ireland. pic.twitter.com/N2MXRnHerI

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026

Suspected HMO's are being burned out across Northern Ireland following the attempted beheading of a man by a Sudanese invader last night. pic.twitter.com/JTMYkBuSl7

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026

As the sun goes down over Northern Ireland, homes and vehicles burn in Belfast. pic.twitter.com/68lGMT9f6Q

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026

Robinson has claimed refugees pose a risk to British women. Meanwhile, he’s telling us the solution to this is to elect the notorious rapist Conor McGregor:

Lead your people Conor.

It's the only way https://t.co/mUdcXrCCQH

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026

A mockery

Robinson mocked the Black residents of Belfast whose houses were burned down:

https://t.co/UxNXqDKwjL pic.twitter.com/eZcZblhCIb

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 10, 2026

In the above, Robinson is referencing the killing of Henry Nowak. On 2 June, the Canary’s Rose Cocker reported on another far-right agitator – Nigel Farage – who used the murder of Nowak to push for “pure, cold rage” – a call that white rioters took up. As Cocker reported, murderer Vickrum Digwa:

wrongfully claimed that he had been the victim of a racialised assault, and responding officers attempted to arrest Nowak as he lay dying. Body-cam footage shows Nowak pleading with officers that he had been stabbed, and he couldn’t breathe. At one point, an officer replied “I don’t think you have, mate.”

Henry Nowak’s parents stated clearly that they didn’t want their son’s murder to be used to stir up hatred and division. Instead, they called for knife crime to be treated as a national emergency.

Advertisement

By suggesting all people of colour should be blamed for the Henry Nowak case, Robinson is promoting ‘collective punishment‘ – an act which is considered to be a war crime and a grave violation of human rights.

This is not normal.

Men like Robinson are dragging us back to the pre-WWII status quo, and we cannot allow them to succeed.

The Musk connection

On 9 June, we reported that Robinson was in Russia. Notably, Robinson met with Elon Musk’s father, Errol. As Elon despises his father and has very thin skin, we predicted this would lead to a split between Elon and Robinson. As it turns out, however, it seems Elon cares more about pushing hatred than avoiding humiliation:

Only by protesting REPEATEDLY and LOUDLY will there be any change!! https://t.co/73GDcLLFwv

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 9, 2026

We say ‘avoiding humiliation’ because Errol Musk is a man who Elon himself describes as “evil”. Despite this, he passively watched on as his tormentor hung out with his minion. Errol is also a man who married his own stepdaughter – Elon’s stepsister – and who allegedly abused several of the Tesla billionaire’s siblings.

Musk is a powerful ally for the British far-right to have, anyway. He’s been pushing their message for years at this point, and surprise, surprise; we now have yearly white riots erupting off the words of social media Goebbels like Robinson.

They're itching for a civil war. A forieng billionaire is trying to use a thug to start it. pic.twitter.com/WsuV8455Wx

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) June 9, 2026

Pogroms

These white riots weren’t just displays of street violence, either. As Robert Freeman reported for the Canary:

Racist thugs have carried out a wave of pogroms in Belfast and nearby towns, setting fire to homes belonging to people of colour. The rioters also attacked businesses that they thought were the property of ‘foreigners’, ignited vehicles, and blocked roads.

A pastor helping those in houses targeted tonight in Belfast says people were being put out of their homes “because they're black”

He says members of his church “who have been with us for 20 years..had their house attacked, windows smashed, houses beside them burned” pic.twitter.com/nYwrVPx8Aa

— Taj Ali (@Taj_Ali1) June 9, 2026

Advertisement

For those who are unfamiliar, a ‘pogrom‘ is “an act of organized cruel behaviour or killing that is done to a large group of people because of their race or religion” (Cambridge Dictionary). The word is most commonly applied to the waves of violence against European Jews in the 20th century, with the most famous example being the Nazi’s Kristallnacht.

Now, we’re once again seeing pogroms in the Western hemisphere; most often against Muslims, but increasingly affecting anyone whose skin tone doesn’t reflect that of far-right rabble rousers like Tommy Robinson.

Just home from dealing with the consequences of tonight's lawlessness.

Perhaps some of the English right wing influencers and local politicians enthusing about these protests would explain to children I met why they have no beds to sleep in tonight.

Utterly disgusted.

— Matthew O'Toole (@MatthewOToole2) June 10, 2026

And make no mistake, Robinson is directly dehumanising the people who now face mob violence. Here he is describing foreign people as “savages”:

Stop importing the fuckers then, send them back!!!

Stop dumping these third world savages into our communities!!!

Enough of your performative politics you wanker!!!#EnoughIsEnough@Keir_Starmer https://t.co/GW34YHAOHa

Advertisement

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) June 9, 2026

And here he was saying the same thing a few months ago:

Independent journalist @ActivePatriotUK has been arrested for social media posts AGAIN!

The nation is literally being invaded by third world savages and the police are going after those who expose it!
pic.twitter.com/2TMLm6tXY1

Advertisement

— Tommy Robinson (@TRobinsonNewEra) March 28, 2026

It’s not condoning the actions of the alleged attempted-murderer to say we shouldn’t be referring to entire groups of people as “savages”.

After all, if we were to collectively denigrate groups for the actions of individuals, the scenes in Belfast would suggest all white people are ‘savages’, wouldn’t they?

Featured image via Mario Tama (Getty Images) / Charles McQuillan (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Source link

MP Rebecca Long Bailey recently spoke at the conference for the Bakers, Food and Allied Workers Union and delivered a fierce rebuke to what the Labour Party has become under Keir Starmer.

Referring to the murkiness of Peter Mandelson’s appointment, and the way in which the party has forgotten working class people, Long-Bailey insisted the party must remember and revive its trade union values.

Her calls coincide with millionaire Nigel Farage telling unions to “ditch Labour” and affiliate with his party which only truly seeks to benefit its vested interests — the super-rich.

These are the highlights from her address…

Long-Bailey’s wish is ‘more compassion, more courage, more unity’

During her conference speech, Long-Bailey discussed the struggle which ordinary people are living in, and how vulnerable our communities are to divisive parties like Farage’s racist Reform UK.

She said:

We’re in really unstable and worrying political times, and we’re gathering in a moment that demands so much from all of us.

More compassion, more courage and more unity because in difficult economic times — when families are struggling to get by, when wages are stagnant, rents are soaring and people are anxious about their futures — it’s our communities who feel the strain most sharply.

And in those moments of hardship the far right tries to seep into the cracks of society, whispering division, sowing hatred, pushing the poisonous idea that one group of people’s misfortune is somehow caused by another group’s existence. And we’ve been here before and we understand that racism and division don’t come from strength — they come from fear and manipulation.

Advertisement

The far-right feeds on despair, they feed on insecurity and on the deliberate neglect of working-class communities by those who hold power and wealth. And they’re trying to pit neighbour against neighbour, worker against worker, British-born against migrant, white against Black — while the real culprits of inequality, those who are extracting wealth from our labour and our public services, go unchallenged.

Public’s faith in Labour ‘shaken’

Long-Bailey then delivered a sharp criticism of what Starmer’s Labour has become under his woeful leadership.

The Labour MP said:

And you know, the very bulwark against it, the party that was created to challenge wealth and power and to hand it to our community needs — well, it’s lost its way. And I was at the local election count in Salford not so long ago.

Salford’s group, we were lucky that we were only one-third of seats up. But those one-third of seats were completely wiped out. I think we kept about two Labour seats out of all of them.

Advertisement

And I watched good people lose that should never have lost. Councillors who spent years fighting for their communities. Men and women who answered calls late at night from frightened residents, who battled for food banks, youth services, warm spaces and housing support, whilst Westminster barely even noticed that places like ours existed. People who worked themselves into exhaustion because they actually believed that public service still meant something.

And it wasn’t them who failed our communities. It wasn’t our local councillors who made pensioners freeze in the winter by cutting the winter fuel allowance. It wasn’t our local councillors who kept the cruel two-child cap and suspended MPs like me for voting to scrap it while children were going hungry. And it wasn’t our local councillors who talked about cutting support for disabled people who were already struggling to survive.

And whilst the party might have thankfully u-turned on all of these stupid and devastating policy decisions that no Labour government should have ever made, the damage was already done. And it was compounded by scandals in Westminster, people accepting free stuff left, right and centre, all the murky business about Peter Mandelson, and people’s faith in the Labour Party and what we actually stood for was shaken.

‘Labour in Westminster abandoned them first’

Long-Bailey pointed to how the party has forgotten its political tradition of fighting for the working class.

She said:

Our communities aren’t just some piece on the Westminster chessboard to be moved about by rich and powerful people. We know that it’s the woman working every hour she can and still lying awake wondering how she’s going to pay the bills. It’s the pensioners who spent 40 or 50 years working their hearts out and now sit wrapped in blankets because eating’s become a luxury.

It’s the lad in a warehouse breaking his back while billionaires are making more money than they are ever going to see in a lifetime. And it’s our community battered by cuts, poverty and neglect and are still somehow finding the strength to look after one another when they know politics has failed them.

Our communities are proud communities, they’re generous communities, working class communities with dignity and resilience running through their veins and they were crying out for a Labour government at the top to fight for them. From what I saw all those weeks ago, it was pain, it was anger and it was the same question asked time and time again: what does Labour actually stand for? And that’s why people turned away. Not because they abandoned Labour values, but because they felt that Labour in Westminster abandoned them first.

Without Labour, ‘what comes next could be very dark’

Stating that Labour is more scared of “upsetting billionaires and newspaper editors than actually looking after our working-class communities”, Long-Bailey says Labour has lost its soul.

In contrast, she argued that the party’s soul came from a working class movement that “demanded dignity and justice in a system that was rigged against them…to confront wealth and power, not sit comfortably beside it.”

Like many across the country, she believes Labour has abandoned much of that tradition, creating a political vacuum that parties such as Reform and the Green Party have moved to fill. Nevertheless, she remains convinced that the party can still recover and reconnect with its roots.

She said:

But despite everything they’re still searching for hope. They’re still desperate for the national party to stand for the very things that all of us do in this union and those values don’t come from dividing working people against each other because the real divide in this country isn’t between ordinary people — it’s between those who struggle to survive and those who profit from that struggle, and Labour should have the courage to say that again because Britain needs a movement with fire in its heart once more.

It’s got to have a movement that will rebuild council housing, rebuild industry, rebuild broken community — a movement that will redistribute wealth and power instead of allowing it to pool endlessly at the top. It is a movement that will stand shoulder to shoulder with our communities and say we will fight for you.

Advertisement

***

And what happened at that local election, it wasn’t just a bad night for Labour, it was existential. It was a siren call that if the Labour Party does not regain its soul and represent the very people it was created to serve, then put simply, it will cease to exist. And what comes next could be very, very dark. Hundreds of years of struggle and fight could be gone overnight. And that’s how pivotal this moment in history is.

Long-Bailey reaffirmed her earlier comments that the prime minister must go. She called for a timetable for transition and a new leader who will rebuild the Labour Party to properly represent working class communities who “deserve dignity, security, hope and a future worth believing in”.

Burnham: Not perfect but ‘better than where we are’

She then touched on Andy Burnham’s leadership bid, stating that he isn’t as left wing as she would like, but that she reckons he’s better than Starmer.

He’s done a really good job as Greater Manchester mayor. He seems to be quite popular on the doors in our community and, while he’s not as left as I would like him to be, he’s definitely better than where we are at the moment. And I think if he worked with every group in the party, and brought the left in on the ideas that we’ve been championing for so long, I think it could be hugely positive.

Immigration is not to blame for everything

Speaking about the bad actors seeking to scapegoat marginalised groups, the Salford MP criticised Labour for poor communication.

She said the party hasn’t been clearly explaining that the issues facing communities aren’t “due to immigration”.

It’s been caused by an economic model that’s been controlled by very powerful people who don’t have the interest about working past communities at heart for over 40 years.

What’s needed for change is a prime minister with “real trade union, working class values at their very heart”. A Labour leader who sounds and speaks like us, and with both feet in the “real world”.

…we’ve got to have somebody that sees outside of Westminster and actually understands what real people and real families are going through.

Featured image via Christopher Furlong/ Getty Image

By Maddison Wheeldon

Source link

The Prime Minister said those responsible for the violence and disorder would “feel the full force of the law”. (Alamy)

2 min read21 min

Keir Starmer has said that rioters who set fire to homes and cars in Belfast on Tuesday night targeted people because of their background, warning that he will not “tolerate it”.

Advertisement

He added that there is “no justification” for people “who encouraged it, online or elsewhere”.

The violent unrest in Northern Ireland on Tuesday night came after a man was charged with attempted murder in Belfast following a knife attack in the city, with footage of the attack shared widely on social media. 

The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) said yesterday that the alleged attacker was of Sudanese descent and in his 30s. On Wednesday, he was named as Hadi Alodid. He is appearing in court this morning, accused of attempted murder. The court has heard that the victim, who remains in hospital, has lost his left eye as a result of the attack.

Advertisement

Footage showed rioters setting fire to vehicles and houses in Belfast on Tuesday night, which Northern Irish First Minister Michelle O’Neill condemned as “outright thuggery”. There were reports of masked groups targeting homes lived in by non-white residents.

In a statement this morning, Starmer said those responsible for the disorder overnight would “feel the full force of the law”. 

“The scenes in Belfast last night were shocking and completely unacceptable. There is no justification for the violence and disorder that we saw threatening our communities, nor for those who encouraged it, online or elsewhere,” he said.

Advertisement

The PM added: “It is clear that people were targeted last night because of their background and I will not tolerate it.

“Those responsible will feel the full force of the law. I’ve spoken to the Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland to convey my thanks to them and the frontline emergency services for their bravery in keeping people safe.

“I’ve also spoken to the First Minister and Deputy First Minister (Emma-Little Pengelly) to discuss the ongoing situation. Appealing for calm must be the priority, and that is what I urge now. We must let the police get on with their work.”

 

Advertisement

Source link

Source link

If you’ve logged on to Twitter over the past few days, there’s one thing you’ve definitely seen, and that’s an image of Nigel Farage beating the governor of the Bank of England:

As it turns out, these deepfakes are being used to lure Farage fans into some sort of crypto scam. And the reason these scammers are using Farage as a lure is no doubt because the Reform leader has promoted crypto himself.

And this guy says he’s looking out for his supporters!

Farage de-bankered

If you’ve seen one image of Farage beating the Bank of England’s Andrew Bailey, you’ve seen several:

pic.twitter.com/b8lN9H4fwm

— MR B.E (@British_Enjoyer) June 9, 2026

The above image – in which Farage has a shooter – proclaims that “Britain needs to see this”. This suggests there was a live broadcast of Question Time in which the Reform leader pulled a gun on another guest, and that this somehow slipped under the radar.

In another image, things got so serious that America had to send one of their police officers over:

pic.twitter.com/Mcu3uM5KnP

— MR B.E (@British_Enjoyer) June 9, 2026

At this point, it’s almost like collecting Pokémon cards. And while the majority of the Pokémon in question are evolutions of Nigel Farage, there is now some variety:

Relieved to see a bit of variation from the meme accountshttps://t.co/n3Frfbvo2q

— Jessica Elgot (@jessicaelgot) June 9, 2026

We personally haven’t seen one of the rare/shiny Ed Milibands, but good luck catching them all.

Some questioned if the Faragalanche is a sign that Elon Musk’s advertising platform is struggling to attract serious clients:

All the ads in my Twitter feed are just AI images of Nigel Farage getting into fights on the set of Question Time.

This platform has to be losing so much money. pic.twitter.com/PhUj5yn3LV

— Tom Nicholas | Watch SLOW NEWS DAY on Nebula! (@Tom_Nicholas) June 9, 2026

Ironically, as the BBC highlighted:

Many of the adverts viewed by the BBC were posted by X user accounts with blue ticks – a symbol indicating a subscription to the platform’s Premium tier.

Platform owner Elon Musk previously touted changes to the verification badge as “the only realistic way to address advanced AI bot swarms taking over” after buying Twitter.

You can laugh at how ridiculous these images are, but the fact that there are so many demonstrates they’re working. People are clicking these. But what are they clicking themselves into?

Age of the Scam

According to the BBC:

By hovering over the links for some of the original posts used in the adverts, the BBC was able to identify that many of them would direct people to sites promoting AI cryptocurrency trading schemes or apps.

Hang on a minute, aren’t AI crypto schemes good? Because we seem to remember Nigel Farage promoting them?

I will be speaking at @TheBitcoinConf from 10pm UK time.

One-in-four 18 to 34 years olds own crypto.

Reform will take them seriously. https://t.co/LgyJdZ6FFe

Advertisement

— Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) May 29, 2025

“Take them seriously”, he said, as his wealthy backers rubbed their hands together. And lest we forget, Farage took £5m from a foreign-based crypto billionaire, and has been ducking media scrutiny since we learned of this:

Later this week it will have been 50 days since @Nigel_Farage last held a press conference.

Given he's had so long to get his story straight, @annaturley is calling on Farage to answer 50 key questions about his secret £5 million "gift". It's time he finally came clean. pic.twitter.com/G6ol6ZtiL7

— Labour Press (@labourpress) June 7, 2026

Here he is in April promoting the crypto scheme of former Tory chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng – the man who delivered the disastrous mini-budget:

BREAKING: Nigel Farage has purchased £2m of Bitcoin for Stack BTC – becoming the first sitting MP and the first UK political party leader in history to publicly buy Bitcoin.

A landmark moment for Bitcoin in British politics.$STAK @Nigel_Farage @blockchain @kwasi_stackbtc… pic.twitter.com/O614kKe5TN

— Stack BTC (@stackbtc_) April 13, 2026

No, Kwasi: your company gave Farage a sweetheart deal. A bonus he can exercise in just two years. Ordinary shareholders don't have this.

The penny-share nature of your firm means Farage is already ~£200k up (+93%). With crypto, hype creates value. https://t.co/maRks88jMO https://t.co/5v9a9j7m5K

— Fraser Nelson (@FraserNelson) April 13, 2026

Aren’t Reform supposed to be an antidote to the failed Tories?

People say that cryptocurrencies have no actual use. They say that because they’re too volatile to use as – you know – currency. Saying they’re ‘useless’, however, ignores two clear use cases:

1. Purchasing contraband outside the ordinary financial system.
2. Scams.

On the latter, Morgan Stanley writes:

• Scammers target cryptocurrency because transfers are fast and typically irreversible.

• Americans lose billions of dollars to crypto scammers each year, often through “too good to be true” tactics like doubling your investments, fake giveaways or job-fee scams.

While the above relates to Americans, don’t worry; Farage and his ilk are determined to import all of America’s ills. And for a sign of what that will look like should Farage take power, just look at what his buddy Trump has been up to:

The $TRUMP meme coin is one of four crypto projects that have turned into a financial jackpot for the president's family and a very bad bet for buyers. https://t.co/mg2JIJvnem

— HuffPost (@HuffPost) June 9, 2026

The Official Trump Meme Coin has now lost 98% of its value.
Elected officials should not be issuing, promoting, and profiting from speculative financial assets.
This should be illegal. pic.twitter.com/Bd1JV57SnI

— Peter Mallouk (@PeterMallouk) June 9, 2026

Advertisement

Since taking office last year, the Trump family has amassed a staggering $2.3 billion fortune from crypto deals alone.

Any crypto legislation needs to stop the massive conflict of interests posed by Donald Trump and his family’s crypto ventures. pic.twitter.com/agarS1SuPV

— Elizabeth Warren (@SenWarren) June 9, 2026

Advertisement

Cattle

Here’s what Farage said about the ads, as reported by the BBC:

Speaking to broadcasters during a visit to Grangemouth on Tuesday, [Farage] added that he did not know “whether to laugh or whether to be angry” about the fake ads.

“The trouble is it’s an AI fake but it looks real in every way, and people know that the governor and I have had our disagreements over things over the years,” he said.

You’ll notice he didn’t go into detail about what the ads were pushing. He couldn’t; if he did, he’d be drawing attention to the fact that crypto is the biggest scam since snake oil.

In all likelihood, the people who are falling for these scams are doing so because they’ve bought into Farage’s shtick. This means many of them are the sort of people who deserve to get ripped off. It’s a problem for Farage, anyway, because the thing they’re getting ripped off by is the thing he’s telling them to invest in.

The question is this: is it a problem because they’re getting ripped off? Or is it a problem because they’re getting ripped off without Farage himself profiting?

Featured image via Paul Reid (Getty Images)

By Willem Moore

Source link

Serena Williams walked back into professional tennis after nearly four years away and immediately reminded the sport what she still carries: presence, power, and a competitive edge that hasn’t dimmed with time.

At 44, the 23‑time Grand Slam singles champion made a winning comeback in the doubles event at Queen’s, partnering 17‑year‑old Canadian Victoria Mboko to defeat third seeds Nicole Melichar‑Martinez and Erin Routliffe 7‑6 (7‑2) 6‑2. It was Williams’ first professional match since the 2022 US Open, and her first ever appearance at the historic Queen’s Club.

The reception matched the moment. A standing ovation greeted her as she stepped onto the Andy Murray Arena, a venue she had never played during her singles career. The response was warm, loud, and unmistakably appreciative of a player whose legacy stretches far beyond the numbers.

Serena Williams sets the tone

Williams and Mboko, an unseeded pairing with a 27‑year age gap, settled quickly into the contest. Williams’ serve was still heavy, still explosive and it clocked speeds up to 120 mph, a reminder that her trademark weapon remains intact.

The early break they secured didn’t hold, with Melichar‑Martinez and Routliffe recovering to force a tie‑break. The tie‑break belonged entirely to Williams and Mboko. They were confidently hitting, with smart court coverage, and a composed finish saw them take it 7‑2.

It was the kind of opening set that signalled Williams wasn’t here for nostalgia. She was here to compete.

Control and a calm finish

The second set was more straightforward, with Williams and Mboko secured a double break, tightening their grip on the match as the crowd leaned into every point. Williams fired two aces in the final game, closing out the win with the kind of authority that defined her peak years.

For a player who has spoken openly about “evolving” away from tennis rather than retiring, this was a return that looked natural, not forced. The movement was sharp, the timing improved as the match went on, and the partnership with Mboko, despite being brand new, clicked immediately.

A win achieved with ease, not expectation

Williams credited Mboko for her composure and impact, noting how naturally their games meshed despite having never played together before. The teenager held her own in the big moments, matching Williams’ intensity and contributing key points in both sets.

The dynamic was clear: Williams’ experience and power paired with Mboko’s energy and athleticism created a balanced, effective team. Their quarter-final opponents Leylah Fernandez and Laura Siegemund, will offer a different test, but the early signs suggest Williams and Mboko are more than just a feel‑good story.

Why Queen’s? 

Williams’ decision to return at Queen’s raised eyebrows, but her explanation was characteristically straightforward. With her children out of school for the summer and a desire to play at a venue she had only ever watched from afar, the timing made sense.

Queen’s has long been a staple of the men’s grass‑court season, but its expansion to include women’s events created an opportunity Williams had never previously been able to take. For a player who has spent her career breaking norms, her debut at 44 felt fitting.

Just Tennis

Ahead of the tournament, Williams made it clear she had nothing to prove. Her competitive comeback wasn’t framed as a chase for records or a final push toward another major. Instead, it was about enjoyment, a fresh challenge, and reconnecting with a sport she shaped for more than two decades.

Her schedule reflects that mindset. She is set to play doubles at the Berlin Open next week, but has not confirmed whether she will enter Wimbledon. The door is open, but there is no rush, no pressure, no narrative being forced.

A return that resonates without hype

Williams’ comeback doesn’t need over‑dramatization.

It is a story rooted in longevity, not sentiment. Williams’ presence alone elevates any court she steps on, but her level of play, sharp, purposeful, competitive, is what makes this return meaningful.

The quarter‑final at Queen’s will offer a clearer picture of where Williams’ game sits in a competitive context. Fernandez and Siegemund are experienced, tactically smart, and comfortable on grass. It will be a different kind of test, one that requires rhythm and cohesion.

Williams has already achieved something significant: she has returned to professional tennis with a win, with authority, and with the same unmistakable aura that defined her prime.

Whether this comeback becomes a short chapter or a longer run, Serena Williams is clearly still a dazzling powerhouse.

Featured image via Getty/Paul Harding

By Faz Ali

Source link

Racist thugs have carried out a wave of pogroms in Belfast and nearby towns, setting fire to homes belonging to people of colour. The rioters also attacked businesses that they thought were the property of ‘foreigners’, ignited vehicles, and blocked roads.

The hate crimes followed an attack carried out in North Belfast, allegedly by a Sudanese man on the evening of Monday June 8. Footage shows the assailant on top of another man, with the attacker using a large knife to stab his victim. Police have charged the alleged perpetrator with attempted murder. The BBC reported on the status of the victim, saying:

A man in his 40s remains in hospital with serious injuries to his eyes, neck and back…

Since the attack, racist groups across social media have attempted to whip up a frenzy, using sensationalised imagery of the attack to exacerbate outrage. The Official Protestant Coalition page, notorious for attempting to incite riots, has subsequently celebrated the carnage. They have posted numerous scenes of destruction alongside heart emojis.

Concerned Parents Newtownabbey (CPN), whose racist and Islamophobic displays are responsible for creating a climate in which hate flourishes, sought to aid the destruction by urging people to turn off Ring doorbells and CCTV. This was to ensure hooligans would be less likely to be caught on camera.

Belfast: vile racists burn homes

Spurred on by this climate, mobs of masked white men set about wrecking the city and driving innocent families from their homes. In the area where CPN have put their hateful AI-generated abominations, hundreds of masked men roamed the area and set fire to vehicles.

On the Newtownards Road in East Belfast, thugs set a bus on fire. Footage on the X account BreakinNewz shows criminals entering a terraced house and setting the property on fire. One shouts “fuck the foreigners!”.

#Breaking #Ireland Footage showing multiple houses holding migrants have been set on fire in Belfast. pic.twitter.com/XztgrogOLF

— BreakinNewz (@BreakinNewz01) June 9, 2026

Advertisement

In a reply to the same tweet, drone footage shows houses burning in what may be the aftermath of the first attack shown, or one of the other numerous acts of ethnic cleansing carried out by racist mobs. The Canary spoke to local activists working in migrant support networks, who said thugs torched at least ten homes. Countless more have fled their homes in terror.

The worst violence took place in loyalist locales, though there were also reports of small groups from nationalist areas taking part in the disorder.

The Northern Ireland Fire & Rescue Service (NIFRS) said they had:

…managed 256 calls resulting in attendance at 62 incidents.

NIFRS brought in “21 fire appliances” (usually meaning fire trucks) from across the north of Ireland to deal with the chaos.

DUP and TUV stir up mob

Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) politicians have performed their usual cynical dance of calling for calm, while simultaneously inciting a febrile atmosphere by emphasising a link between immigration and violence. Party leader Gavin Robinson did both in the Commons. He connected fictional “uncontrolled immigration” to the North Belfast attack, while warning about potential violent disorder in response.

DUP education minister Paul Givan did likewise on TalkTV. This is, of course, the same man who celebrates the horrors carried out by his favourite ethnostate, so-called ‘Israel’.

Traditional Unionist Voice leader Jim Allister went further still, complaining to hatemongers GB News about “people of violent disposition” with an “alien culture”. He suggested such violence is alien to “British culture”.

Far from being alien, extreme violence has been central to British culture for centuries. It was what enabled its empire to murder millions of people, and British brutality continues to this very day through their participation in the Gaza genocide.

The north of Ireland had thirty years of violence carried out almost exclusively by white men. The island as a whole endured 800 years of intermittent conflict, with British colonialism at the root. Hundreds of white men now carry out yearly violent pogroms against other ethnic groups. The north of Ireland has appalling gender violence rates, again perpetrated almost entirely by white men. Yet Allister and co expect us to believe that this Eden, a paradise of uninterrupted pacifism, has been robbed of its innocence by one Sudanese interloper.

In reality, the above politicians practice selective outrage when certain acts of violence have particular political use. That is, to convince the constituents they routinely fail that the problems in their lives are the result of immigrants, rather than useless politicians.

Ethnic cleansing now routine event in north of Ireland

People Before Profit’s Fiona Ferguson had a more sensible take, highlighting how:

…defence of workers’ rights, the fight for better living conditions, the fight for housing, the fight for public services and the fight against racism are one and the same.

She was calling on trade unions to recognise the scale of racist violence in Ireland and get more involved to stop it. The reality is stark: in the Six Counties, white thugs carrying out ethnic cleansing based on race has become a routine occurrence. It has happened three summers in a row, and all indicators are that racists and Islamophobes are becoming emboldened rather than deterred.

Inspired by a global far-right acting with impunity, and motivated by short-term political gain that distracts from their own incompetence, the worst of the unionist political class are happy to see their own towns and cities burn rather than confront this dystopian reality.

Featured image via Getty/Charles McQuillan

By Robert Freeman

Source link

Credit: 2026 Sport England. All Rights Reserved

Lisa Dodd-Mayne, Executive Director, Partnerships and Place
| Sport England

Advertisement

As devolution reshapes local decision-making across England, Sport England is urging leaders to embed physical activity into plans for healthier, more connected and economically resilient communities.

Devolution is fundamentally about how places work.

Advertisement

As new strategic authorities take shape and local government reorganisation continues across England, decisions about transport, housing, economic growth and public services are increasingly being made at a more local level – closer to the realities of place.

In that context, sport and physical activity cut across many of these issues shaping local places.

Sport and physical activity are often treated as standalone services, sitting within leisure budgets and recreation planning. Yet in practice, they sit at the intersection of some of the most important outcomes facing local leaders – health, opportunity, transport connectivity and community cohesion.

The focus is less on whether physical activity is relevant to devolution, and more on how early it is considered in the conversation.

Advertisement

When brought in late, sport and physical activity can often be treated as add-ons. When considered from the outset, they become part of how places are designed, how communities function and how local systems operate.

That distinction matters.

The evidence base is substantial. Our latest research estimates that, in the last year alone, community sport and physical activity generated more than £122bn in social value across England. That includes improved wellbeing, stronger social connections and reduced pressure on health and care services.

Advertisement

In other words, this is not a standalone area. Its relevance is most clearly seen not in isolation, but through its interaction with wider priorities and systems.

Take transport.

As active travel becomes more central to local and regional transport planning, walking, wheeling and cycling are increasingly being discussed alongside congestion, air quality and carbon reduction. But they are also fundamentally about how people access jobs, education, services and opportunity.

When physical activity is built into transport planning from the outset, it helps shape systems that support everyday movement.

Advertisement

The same applies to housing and planning.

As local areas plan for growth and new development, there is growing emphasis on placemaking and design quality. Access to green space, safe walking and cycling routes, and opportunities for recreation are increasingly recognised as core features of successful communities.

These are not peripheral considerations. They influence long-term health outcomes, social interaction and the liveability of new places over decades.

In regeneration and economic development, the link is equally clear.

Advertisement

Investment in public spaces, parks, leisure infrastructure and active travel networks contributes to places that are more attractive to live in, work in and invest in. Major events bring visibility and economic uplift, but the quality of everyday environments also determines whether places feel active and connected.

There is also a growing intersection with health.

Local health systems are managing rising demand linked to inactivity, long-term conditions and poor mental wellbeing. This is not a challenge can be addressed in isolation.

Physical activity is increasingly being considered as part of wider prevention-focused approaches – not as a substitute for clinical care, but as a complementary part of how people stay well for longer and remain connected to their communities.

Advertisement

This is where place-based working becomes particularly relevant.

One of the most consistent lessons from devolution to date is that outcomes improve when organisations work around place and shared priorities.

Place-based approaches allow local partners to align investment, insight and delivery around the specific needs of communities, rather than the structures of individual services.

Sport and physical activity fit naturally into this way of working.

Advertisement

In Greater Manchester, GM Moving has become a widely referenced example of this approach in practice. Physical activity has been positioned within a broader system focus on population health, inequalities and wellbeing, bringing together local authorities, health partners, voluntary organisations and communities around shared outcomes.

Importantly, this has not been driven by a single organisation, but through sustained collaboration across the system.

A similar approach can be seen in Cumbria, where partners have worked across rural and dispersed communities to better align physical activity provision with local need. The focus there has been on accessibility, place-specific barriers and collaboration across sectors to ensure activity reflects geography.

While the contexts differ, the underlying principle is consistent – physical activity has the greatest impact when it is embedded in wider place-based strategies, rather than operating alongside them.

Advertisement

That’s why we’re expanding our focus on place-based investment, including a £250m commitment to more than 90 communities experiencing the highest levels of inactivity and inequality. The aim is to support long-term, locally-led approaches, shaped by local evidence and delivered in partnership with wider system stakeholders. Through this work, we’re connecting Active Partnerships, local government, health, transport, education and voluntary sector organisations. The focus is increasingly on enabling collaboration across systems, rather than delivering in isolation.

As devolution continues to evolve, different areas will naturally take different approaches based on their priorities and governance models. That variation is both expected and necessary.

But across those differences, one theme is becoming clearer.

Where physical activity is linked to wider strategic goals – whether that is improving health, supporting growth, strengthening communities or improving quality of place – it is more likely to be sustained, scaled and embedded.

Advertisement

The opportunity, then, is not to elevate sport and physical activity as a separate agenda, but to recognise its role within the decisions that are already reshaping places.

Recognising the pace of change across devolution and local government reorganisation, Sport England has recently published a Devolution Policy Position Statement to help local leaders, strategic authorities and partners better understand the role sport and physical activity can play in delivering local growth, prevention and wellbeing ambitions. Further information, guidance and support can be accessed at www.sportengland.org/devolution-statement.

Source link