US President Donald Trump has called for the genocide of Iran. In his latest bizarre rant, Trump said he would wipe out the country unless it opened the straits of Hormuz ahead of a deadline he’d set for 8pm on 7 April 2026. Trump said on Truth Social:

A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again. I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS?

Adding:

We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World. 47 years of extortion, corruption, and death, will finally end. God Bless the Great People of Iran!

The stream-of-consciousness post was full of contradictions. Why, if the ‘regime’ has been successfully changed, does an entire civilisation need to “die”?

Why the threat of obliteration and then a nod to the ‘great people of Iran’?

And how does Trump mean to do it? Is it a nuclear threat? Or just his typical bully-boy bluster? Trump is hard to read, as ever. He is a declining man and the head of a declining empire, clearly. But we do know he has developed a taste for war crimes…

Trump’s taste for war crime

Trump’s second term has been full of war criminality. On the one hand he has supported the Israeli genocide in Gaza. And in his current attack on Iran he has said outright he is indifferent to war crimes.

As the Guardian reported:

Donald Trump has said that he was “not at all” concerned about committing possible war crimes as he again threatened to destroy Iran’s bridges and power plants if Tehran does not meet his Tuesday 8pm ET deadline to reopen the strait of Hormuz.

The Guardian’s senior international correspondent said:

In a rambling national address on Wednesday, the US president warned that if Iran did not reach an unspecified deal with him, US forces would “hit each and every one of their electric-generating plants” and “bring [Iran] back to the stone ages – where they belong”.

According to Politico, Trump expanded by arguing:

You know what’s a war crime? Having a nuclear weapon. Allowing a sick country, with demented leadership, [to] have a nuclear weapon — that’s a war crime.

However, the same article suggested the Pentagon were trying to find ways to frame Iranian energy and other infrastructure as dual civilian-military use to escape war crime allegations down the road:

The Pentagon is expanding a list of Iranian energy sites it can target for attacks to include ones that provide fuel and power to both civilians and the military, a likely workaround if the administration is accused of war crimes for striking basic infrastructure.

Trump’s colonial death-world

Trump’s comment reminds us again of the genocidal racism generated to sustain empire. Commenter Nesrine Malik reminded us in relation to Gaza in July 2025:

What does getting used to it [genocide] look like? It looks like accepting that there are certain groups of people who can be killed. That it is, in fact, reasonable and necessary that they should die in order to maintain a political system that is built on the inequality of human life.

This is what the philosopher Achille Mbembe calls “necropolitics” – the exercising of power to dictate how some people live and how others must die.

Advertisement

She goes on:

Necropolitics creates “deathworlds” where there are “new and unique forms of social existence in which vast populations are subjected to living conditions that confer upon them the status of the living dead”.

Adding:

In those deathworlds the killing of others, and the destruction of their habitat through epic military capabilities whose impact is never experienced by the citizens of the countries responsible, confer even more value on the humanity of those in the “civilised” west. They are exempt because they are good, not because they are strong. Palestinians die because they are bad, not because they are weak.

As in Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, Gaza (and countless other places), so it is in Iran, as far as imperialist America is concerned.

Humiliation and decline

Politico also reminded its readers that US defence secretary Pete Hegseth gutted those parts of the Pentagon which were meant to minimise civilian harm after taking office.

US-Israel attacked Iran first on 28 February without provocation. Iran was offering unprecedented concessions in negotiations at the time. The Pentagon has since stated there was no imminent threat from Iran. And the UN’s atomic watchdog, the IAEA, has said there is no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear weapon.

The US has achieved none of its original war aims. Iran predictably closed the Straits of Hormuz, a vital oil channel, once attacked – creating a global energy crisis. Far from being defeated, Iran has said the war will continue until “the enemy’s inevitable and permanent humiliation, disgrace, regret, and surrender”. Trump came to power on an anti-war ‘America First’ ticket. He now faces worldwide humiliation.

One hundred legal experts warned that US actions in Iran could be considered war crimes on 2 April. They also said they were deeply concerned that Trump administration’s rhetoric – as evidenced above – would lead to even greater horrors.

Clearly, the War on Terror has had a corrosive effect on western institutions – like the UN and ICC – built to minimise war crimes and civilian harm after WW2. We can say this while acknowledging that those ‘rules’ were never evenly applied anyway. To the narrow degree they did exist, the meagre protections they once offered are being dismantled before our very eyes.

Featured image via the Canary

Australia’s most decorated living war hero has been charged over war crimes allegations in Afghanistan. Ben Roberts-Smith has been charged with five counts of murder.

Australia held a long inquiry into war crimes allegations by Australian SAS soldiers. The alleged crimes took place between 2009 and 2012. Australian Federal Police said:

It will be alleged that the victims were not taking part in hostilities at the time of their alleged murder in Afghanistan.

It will be alleged that the victims were detained, unarmed, and were under the control of ADF members when they were killed.

Adding:

It will be alleged that the victims were shot by the accused, or shot by subordinate members of the ADF in the presence of and acting on, the orders of the accused.

CNN reported:

Among the accusations reported were that Roberts-Smith had shot dead an unarmed Afghan teenager and kicked a handcuffed man off a cliff before ordering him to be shot dead.

War crimes

Roberts-Smith was arrested at an Australian airport on 1 April three years after he lost:

a multimillion-dollar defamation case against nine newspapers in June 2023.

As the Canary wrote at the time:

The case has been referred to as a ‘proxy’ war crimes trial.

That case resulted in a finding that the allegations were “substantially true”.

Ross Barnett, director of investigations at Australia’s Office of Special investigations (OSI) told CNN on 7 March:

We don’t have access to the crime scenes, we don’t have photographs, site plans, measurements, the recovery of projectiles, blood spatter analysis, all of those things we would normally get at a crime scene.

Roberts-Smith is a recipient of the Victoria Cross, the highest Commonwealth award for military bravery. However, these allegations have shattered the mythologies of soldierly bravery across many of the nations which took part in the War on Terror-era occupations.

The Canary wrote about the international pattern of war crimes by special forces here.

UK SAS troops are currently subject to an inquiry into alleged war crimes. The US also had its share. Significantly, US president Donald Trump made a habit of pardoning convicted US war criminals like Navy Seal Eddie Gallagher.

The War on Terror produced a pattern of war crimes allegations – not least among elite special forces units. That pattern expanded with Israel’s genocide in Gaza. An increasingly unhinged US empire struggles with its own inevitable decline, repeating the same patterns in Iran.

Featured image via the Canary

The officers’ branch of Unite has voted overwhelmingly for ‘all-out’ strike action over the refusal of Unite’s management to recognise its union.

Of a huge 80% turnout, 85% of officers voted in support of the strike.

This is the second time Unite’s general secretary, Sharon Graham, has faced strike action from union employees after staff working for Graham’s husband, Jack Clarke, walked out complaining of bullying, misogyny and intimidation.

The ballot result comes as Graham campaigns for re-election and as her hangers-on try to get elected on to Unite’s executive.

Unite: ‘It’s time to Reunite and end the toxicity’

The Reunite the Union activist group welcomed the strike vote and promised solidarity with the workers, which includes a “three-point plan to resolve the dispute”. A statement from the group stated it’s “time to Reunite and end the toxicity which is dividing our union”.

It continued:

Self-defeating intransigence is a familiar trait of Sharon Graham’s management.

It is the same approach which resulted in picket lines outside Holborn against a ‘toxic bullying culture,’ complete with a ‘counter-demo’ led by Graham’s self-styled enforcer Chris Stiles and our union’s Organising Director Tayra Lopes-Lister. This resulted from the BDSU researchers simply requesting a meeting with their line management over grading.

It is the same approach which forced members of our Executive Council to turn to the Certification Officer to compel Sharon Graham’s management team to disclose our union’s finances.

Advertisement

Politically, the same intransigence has led Sharon Graham to remain silent on Reform’s direct attack on our union and our members.

Industrially, the same intransigence has led important disputes to defeat. For example, the nearly six-month strike at Bakkavor in Spalding ended in members having to accept the same percentage pay offer originally rejected at the start of the dispute. That dispute was continued from above, despite growing numbers of members crossing their own picket. From Veolia to Port Talbot, a pattern of behaviour repeats itself.

A pervasive culture of toxicity and division has been created in our union. It manifests in different ways, but the cause is the same.

So bad has this alleged conduct been that more than 90% of Unite staff working at the union’s Holborn HQ voted for strike action. Three — some say four — of the five women who worked in Clarke’s department since Graham formed it and put him in charge of it have left. Union sources say they also alleged bullying and abuse.

Unite’s staff branch unanimously condemned the union’s abuse of its staff. The influential Officers National Committee (ONC) accused Graham of using Murdoch-style anti-union tactics against workers and officers unionising and taking collective action.

Now, after fighting Graham’s moves to undermine their attempts to organise since the beginning of 2025, Unite’s officer group will soon begin strike action. It is an action that may well impact her attempts to get herself and her hangers-on re-elected.

Featured image via the Canary

A new memorial for Palestinian civilians could be added to Newcastle’s Peace Garden following a proposal supported by local councillors and community groups.

The Peace Garden, located within the grounds of Newcastle’s Civic Centre, was established as a space for remembrance and reflection for communities affected by war, genocide and violence.

Councillor Habib Rahman has led the new initiative. His work with Newcastle City Council helped create the memorial area.

Two memorials have already been installed in the garden. In 2024, a memorial stone was unveiled in remembrance of the genocide against the Tutsi people of Rwanda, supported by Newcastle’s Rwandan community.

A second memorial was installed in 2025 to recognise the genocide against the Roma people. At the same time, an oak tree was planted to commemorate Jewish refugees and victims of the Srebrenica genocide.

Plans for memorial stone and olive tree

Rahman has now proposed a further memorial stone to honour Palestinian civilians who have lost their lives during the Israel–Gaza conflict. The proposal also includes planting an olive tree as a symbol of remembrance.

The idea was presented to Newcastle city council leader Karen Kilgour and referenced in a cabinet update to full council in March 2026 under future considerations for the Peace Garden.

Council documents state that Rahman is facilitating discussions with the local Palestinian community, to establish a permanent memorial within the Civic Centre grounds.

Council arboriculture specialists are currently considering the most suitable location within the Civic Centre green spaces to plant the olive tree.

The item was not discussed in detail at the March council meeting as the session was dominated by budget discussions. However, Rahman later wrote to the council leader requesting that the proposal be progressed through a council and cabinet decision.

He also confirmed that the full cost of the memorial and tree planting would be covered entirely by the community.

In a letter responding to the proposal, a council officer confirmed formal acceptance of the plan to install a permanent memorial commemorating innocent Palestinian civilians.

Rahman said he was proud of the work that had gone into creating the Peace Garden:

I am immensely proud of the work undertaken to establish the Peace Garden. As a City of Sanctuary, it is fitting that Newcastle has a dedicated space for remembrance and reflection.
It reflects our city’s long-standing tradition of solidarity, our stance against genocide and war, and our commitment to empathy and remembrance.

He added:

We have already made history with memorials recognising the genocide against the Tutsi people of Rwanda and the genocide against the Roma people.

By establishing a memorial for the Palestinian people, alongside the planting of an olive tree, we have the opportunity to make history again, which we will now work towards a date later this year.

Mohammed Wafi, of the Palestine Community North East, said:

We thank Councillor Rahman for his leadership in securing this historic approval. This memorial will mean a great deal to our community, and we will now work with him and the Council to deliver it.

Rahman said he would continue working with Newcastle’s Palestinian community and the city council to deliver the memorial later this year.

When completed, this will become the first Palestinian memorial of its kind in the UK and Europe.

Featured image supplied

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has called for a targeted emergency package to protect UK companies from the effects of Donald Trump’s illegal war. The union body refers to at-risk manufacturers like chemicals, ceramics and glass. And it says:

Trump’s war must not put jobs in critical industries at risk.

In the face of “Trumpflation” sending gas and energy prices soaring, the TUC argues that urgent support is needed to protect energy intensive sectors from the economic damage of the war. Of course, any impact on the UK pales in comparison with the horrors in countries directly under attack. But the TUC points out the war and its consequences could affect thousands of UK jobs.

The call comes after the OECD warns the UK faces the biggest hit to growth of all G20 economies from the war in West Asia.

Emergency measures for most at-risk manufacturers

Immediate support should focus on the most at-risk businesses to protect key UK manufacturing sectors, the TUC says.

Gas-intensive businesses face the most immediate exposure in the current energy crisis. The union body is therefore calling for a temporary targeted gas price cap to stabilise the price of gas for critical industries. This would target sectors where gas accounts for at least 70% of energy demand (like ceramics), or at least 70% of raw materials.

As the effects of the war flow through to higher electricity prices for industry, the TUC is also calling for the government urgently to speed up its energy price support scheme (the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme – BICS) and make sure it reaches the manufacturing sites that need it the most. Many manufacturers (beyond those in gas-intensive industries) were already struggling before the crisis hit, and are now in even more need of support.

Fix the foundations to prevent future crises

Support must also go beyond the immediate crisis, the TUC argues. The UK has been at the “mercy of global gas markets for too long”. With an unstable president in the White House, and increasing volatility across the globe, UK households and businesses cannot afford to be “lurching from crisis to crisis”.

Alongside immediate-term support, the UK desperately needs structural change and investment so that industry doesn’t bear the brunt of future gas price spikes. This will also mean there is less need for government to step in during each crisis.

The TUC is calling for government to de-link electricity prices from gas. This would move the UK from being a price-taker to a price-maker. The government should also radically increase UK gas storage capacity, and accelerate investment in energy efficiency and electrification upgrades.

These proposals to reform the UK’s energy system and market design and to upgrade UK industry will reduce the UK’s industrial vulnerability to external crises, boost long-term resilience of domestic industries, and help protect good jobs for the long-run. Fixing the foundations of the UK’s energy market would support not just gas-intensive industries, but wider manufacturing like steel, metal and paper.

TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said:

Already struggling before the war, Trumpflation has sent gas prices soaring – further piling the pressure on some of Britain’s key industries like chemicals, ceramics and glass.

Trump’s war must not put jobs in critical industries at risk.

Advertisement

The government should urgently bring forward a temporary targeted gas price cap, to stabilise the price of gas for critical industries and protect UK manufacturing, and speed up the energy price support scheme making sure it reaches crucial sectors.

Smart government action can stop us lurching from crisis to crisis. The UK has been at the mercy of global gas markets for too long.

Now is the time to fix the foundations, reducing the UK’s vulnerability to global gas price shocks, boosting resilience of key industries, and protecting good jobs for the long-run.

Chief executive of Make UK Stephen Phipson said:

The war in Iran has highlighted vulnerabilities in the UK energy market that have been evident for some time and have not been addressed, the more that action is delayed the greater the risk of rapid deindustrialisation.

This now requires, urgent, efficient, and substantive action to bring down the cost of energy for industry as the clock is now approaching midnight for many companies.

This must start with the immediate implementation of the British Industrial Competitiveness Scheme to all manufacturers otherwise we could face a rapid unravelling of British industry.

Featured image via the Canary

The Home Office is routinely detaining so-called “age-disputed children” as adults as part of its ‘One in, one out’ asylum scheme. That’s according to an investigation from the independent Humans for Rights Network.

Despite Labour’s increasingly far-right anti-asylum posturing, it remains illegal to detain unaccompanied child asylum seekers in adult detention centers. However, the Home Office is routinely ignoring this rule by claiming that these children are, possibly, adults.

Home Office – ‘one in, one out’

In the seven months since ‘One in, one out’ began last September, the Home Office has detained 76 ‘age-disputed’ kids. However, Freedom of information (FOI) requests issued to local authority children’s services have found that claimants treated as adults by the Home Office are often later determined to be children by social workers.

Indeed, of the 76 detainees, 26 have either been reassessed as children by Social Services, or are in the process of being. Meanwhile, 11 kids are waiting for age assessment. The Home Office has already forcibly deported 13 to France.

Damningly, one child was confirmed to be a minor after being forcibly deported.

Among the kids in question, a large proportion are Sudanese, Eritrean, or Afghan – all zones of intense and brutal conflict. Humans for Rights Network spokesperson Maddie Harris stated that:

Many of these children are survivors of torture and trafficking and are experiencing acute declines in their mental health as a result of what is often months of detention in the UK.

These children are additionally prejudiced from accessing the care and support they are entitled to as children as well as adequate, social worker-led local authority age assessments. No child should be detained, with those who remain in detention immediately released to allow them to recover and to ensure they are able to access age assessments conducted in the community where required.

The National Age Assessment Board

Home Office age assessments fall under the domain of the National Age Assessment Board (NAAB). Watchdog groups like the Refugee and Migrant Children’s Consortium (RMCC) and Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration (ICIBI) have raised pressing concerns about NAAB’s processes and transparency.

In particular, NAAB blurs the boundaries between ‘independent’ social workers and immigration enforcement. Likewise, it also has a massive negative impact on the kids in its ‘care’, and its decisions are deeply questionable. An RMCC report stated that:

Multiple legal cases have found NAAB assessments to be flawed, with issues including failure to apply the benefit of the doubt; reliance on subjective or culturally inappropriate indicators; and the dismissal of credible evidence from professionals who know the child. Judges have criticised the NAAB’s approach as being adversarial, inconsistent with guidance, and lacking in objectivity.

Back on 25 March, the High Court was forced to step in to prevent the Home Office from deporting two ‘age-disputed’ kids. Solicitor Elizabeth Cole, who represented one of the children, explained the level of disregard the Home Office displayed:

The Home Office’s contention that claimed a child’s age need not be determined as a matter of fact prior to their removal is highly concerning, and clearly warrants proper consideration by the court. This is particularly so as children are an extremely vulnerable group. We hope this decision will encourage the Home Office to think twice before trying to remove any disputed children to France, in order to alleviate the distress and harm which will inevitably ensue by result.

Routine inhumanity

The Guardian confronted the Home Office with the Humans for Rights Networks’ record of its mistreatment of asylum seekers. However, the government department chose to issue a stock response:

This government is bearing down on small boat crossings. We have stopped over 42,000 illegal migrants attempting to cross the channel since the election. We have removed or deported almost 60,000 people who were here illegally.

But we are going further to remove the incentives that draw illegal migrants to this country and increase removals and deportations of those with no right to be here.

Advertisement

Apparently, those “incentives that draw illegal migrants” include the laws which require treating traumatised children with the care they so desperately need. After all, all the Home Office needs to do is state that they’re lying about being kids. Then, miracle of miracles, it’s free to deport them. No reasonable doubt needed.

If you still needed proof of the utter routine inhumanity of  successively more anti-asylum governments, then look no further.

Featured image via the Canary