Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Lord Ashcroft: The SNP’s record, the independence debate, what matters to voters, and is Nicola Sturgeon an asset or a liability? My latest Scottish polling

Published

on

Lord Ashcroft: The SNP’s record, the independence debate, what matters to voters, and is Nicola Sturgeon an asset or a liability? My latest Scottish polling

Lord Ashcroft KCMG PC is an international businessman, philanthropist, author and pollster. For more information on his work, visit lordashcroft.com

 With Holyrood elections just over six weeks away, my latest polling looks at Scottish public opinion towards the SNP government’s record, the parties and leaders, the independence debate, and the issues that will shape the outcome in May. The full report, including thoughts from our focus groups around the country, is here. My commentary on the research for Holyrood magazine is here.

 The SNP government’s record

 

Advertisement

Offered three statements about the SNP government’s record, just under one in five Scots said they thought it was doing a good job. This included 40 per cent of those who voted SNP in 2021, and only just over half of those intending to back the party at the 2026 election. A further 22 per cent overall, including nearly four in ten likely SNP voters, said the SNP was doing a bad job but was still better than the alternatives. The combined overall total of 41 per cent thinking the government was doing a good job or was better than the alternatives matched the proportion who said the SNP was doing a bad job and they would rather have someone else running the Scottish government.

 Looking in more detail at the SNP government’s record, its best marks overall were for “standing up for Scotland” – a majority of all voters say it has done a good job on this score, including three quarters of 2021 SNP list voters and nearly nine in ten of those intending to vote

for the party this year. On other things, the proportion saying the SNP government had done a good job did not exceed 35 per cent (“making life better for people in Scotland”) and fell to as low as 26 per cent for “honesty and integrity” – though majorities of both 2021 and likely 2026 SNP voters said the Scottish government had performed well on this score.

 Scots said they thought the Westminster Labour government’s record since the 2024 election was bad, by 73 per cent to 15 per cent. Those who had voted Labour in 2024 said it was doing a bad job by 68 per cent to 23 per cent. However, they thought the SNP government’s record in Holyrood since 2007 was bad by a narrower 18-point margin. Nearly two thirds of 2021 SNP list voters said they thought their party had done a good job in government, as did nearly eight in ten of those intending to vote SNP in the regional list vote.

Advertisement

Issues and priorities

 Asked to name the three most important issues facing Scotland at the moment, Scots as a whole chose health and the NHS, the cost of living, and the economy and jobs as their top three priorities. These were followed by immigration, poverty and inequality, housing, education and climate change. However, there were notable differences between political groups. Health and the cost of living topped the list for those intending to vote SNP, Labour, Conservative and Green in the regional list vote. For the first three of these the economy was in third place, but for Greens this spot went to poverty and inequality.

Getting Scottish independence was the fourth biggest priority for those intending to vote SNP, and was named by just under a quarter of likely SNP voters. For Greens, getting independence ranked equal eighth. It was named by 12 per cent of them, on a par with Brexit and welfare, and after health, the cost of living, poverty, climate change, the economy and jobs, housing and immigration.

 

Advertisement

 Asked what they would have in mind when deciding how to vote in the Holyrood elections, Scots were most likely to choose having a strong voice for Scotland, followed by backing the party they most support or stopping the party they most oppose. Only 26% overall mentioned the record of the SNP government, putting it in fourth place.

Again, however, there were sharp differences between political groups. Two thirds of those intending to vote SNP chose having a strong voice for Scotland, with just over half saying they would be using their vote to try and get an independent Scotland. For Reform, Lib Dem

and Conservative voters, the biggest motivating factor was keeping Scotland in the UK. For Greens, the top two places went to backing the party they most support and stopping the party they most oppose.

Independence

Advertisement

 

Asked how they would vote if an independence referendum were held tomorrow, respondents said they would vote No by a three-point margin, with 18 per cent saying they didn’t know or would not vote. Including only those giving a voting intention, this gives a result of Yes 48 per cent, No 52 per cent. (This compares to a 12-point margin for No in our previous survey in February 2023).

Among those currently intending to vote SNP in the regional list vote, 84 per cent said they would vote Yes to independence, while 7 per cent would vote No and 8 per cent said they didn’t know. Ninety-four per cent of those intending to vote for the Scottish Conservatives in the regional list vote said they would vote No, as did nearly three quarters of those intending to back Scottish Labour, six in ten of those backing the Scottish Lib Dems and nearly eight in ten of those intending to vote Reform. Those intending to vote Green said they would back independence by a 50-point margin, with 12 per cent saying they didn’t know or wouldn’t vote.

A plurality of Scots thought a referendum tomorrow would result in a No vote on independence, but the reverse was true if a referendum were to be held in five years’ time.

Advertisement

 

 

Only a quarter of Scots overall – including only just over half of likely SNP voters – said that pro-independence parties winning a majority of seats in the May election should be taken as a mandate for another independence referendum. More than six in ten agreed with the alternative proposition that someone cannot be assumed to support independence just because they support a particular party. Those intending to vote Green chose the second statement by a four-point margin.

Parties and leaders

Advertisement

 

When we asked how favourable or otherwise people felt towards various politicians, Nicola Sturgeon emerged with the most positive score (but also one of the highest negatives). Nigel Farage had a higher favourable score than Keir Starmer, but their net scores (favourable minus unfavourable) were the same.

 Comparing these favourability ratings with the figures above, we can see that Anas Sarwar, Zack Polanski, Ed Davey and Kemi Badenoch are more popular (or less unpopular) than their respective parties. While same is also true of Gillian Mackay, Alex Cole-Hamilton and Russell Findlay, this owes more to their relatively low recognition figures than to high favourability scores.

 

Advertisement

A majority of Scots said they saw Nicola Sturgeon as a liability rather than an asset to her party. Likely Green voters were also more likely to see her as a liability. However, SNP voters themselves were more likely to take the opposite view: those intending to back the party in the regional list vote this year saw her as an asset by 50 per cent to 33 per cent.

 By a margin two-to-one margin, Scots thought Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar was right to call for Keir Starmer to resign as prime minister (indeed those intending to vote for Scottish Labour in the Holyrood elections were the only group to disagree). However, a majority of all parties’ voters thought Sarwar had made the call as a tactical move to distance Scottish Labour from the Starmer government, rather than that he was saying what he believed was right.

Attitude to Reform UK

Just over half of Scots (including around three quarters of likely SNP and Labour voters) said they thought Reform UK were a negative influence on politics and they wished the party didn’t exist. A further 17 per cent, including one third of likely Conservative voters and more than one in five likely Lib Dems, say they probably wouldn’t vote Reform but they say things that need to be said so they’re glad the party is around. Just under one in five, including half of all 2021 Conservative voters, say they like a lot of what the party stands for and could see themselves voting for it in an election.

Advertisement

We asked people how likely they thought they were to vote for each party in the Scottish Parliament elections in May on a scale from 0 to 100 – where 0 means there is no chance, they will vote for that party and 100 means they will definitely vote for that party. Looking at those saying they are more likely than not to vote for one party (those whose likelihood of voting for one party was at least 50/100), this implies the following state of the parties in the constituency and regional list votes at the outset of the campaign:

Six segments

Our analysis identifies six similarly sized segments within the Scottish electorate.

  • The SNP Stalwarts have given the party strong support at the last two general elections and are the most likely to vote SNP in May, although a significant minority will use their list vote for the Scottish Greens. Their vote in the Scottish Parliament elections tends to be about having a strong voice for Scotland and getting an independent Scotland. They think the SNP government is doing a good job and overwhelmingly prefer a SNP-Green coalition to any alternative. Economically they are very optimistic for their local area and for Scotland, but far less so for the UK. They support Scottish independence and are the only segment to agree that a majority of seats being won by pro-independence parties constitutes a mandate for a second referendum. They are evenly divided as to whether Scotland should keep using North Sea oil and gas reserves.
  • The Lib/Lab Unionists are most likely to vote Labour or Lib Dem both in Holyrood and Westminster elections and have consistently done so in the past. They are most likely to identify education, the economy and the NHS as major issues. They tend to say the SNP government is doing a bad job and they want them replaced, although a significant proportion don’t know. They strongly oppose independence and expect that Scotland would reject it in a referendum held tomorrow, but are far less sure about a result in five years’ time. They have a strong preference for a coalition between Labour and the Liberal Democrats over an SNP-Green coalition; this preference persists but becomes much weaker if the Conservatives are added as a coalition partner. However, they prefer a SNP-Green coalition to any coalition involving Reform.
  • Though the Open to Tories segment has the highest support for the Conservatives as things stand, their voting intention is currently spit between the Conservatives, Labour and Reform. They backed the Conservatives by a fair margin in 2019, but switched to Labour in 2024. These voters are most likely to care about defence, welfare the economy and immigration. They are the least likely of any segment to be concerned about the cost of living. In the Holyrood elections they are most likely to be motivated by keeping Scotland in the UK and SNP government’s record. About two-thirds of this segment disapprove of the SNP’s performance in government and want them replaced; there are consistent clear preferences for any coalition of unionist parties to a SNP-Green coalition.
  • The Leaning Green segment are currently more likely to give their list vote to the Greens than the SNP and show the strongest Green support overall, despite having voted heavily for the SNP in the last two general elections. They are most likely to name poverty and inequality, drug addiction and climate change as the key issues, and say their Holyrood vote will be motivated by getting a strong voice for Scotland and Scottish independence, although not to the same extent as the SNP Stalwarts; they are also the most likely to want to stop the party they most oppose. They are most likely to think the SNP government is not doing a good job, but is better than the alternatives. They are the most likely to want to stop issuing North Sea oil and gas licences, and the most likely to be students or unemployed.
  • The Reform Curious group had the strongest support for the Conservatives in 2019, but the Tory vote among this segment dropped 25 points in 2024 with Reform the primary beneficiaries. They show the strongest support for Reform in Holyrood and future Westminster elections. They are most likely to consider immigration and crime as important issues facing Scotland. Over 80 per cent of them say the SNP government is doing a bad job and want them replaced, and they are the most likely to expect the economy in their local area and the Scottish economy to perform badly over the next year.
  • Having voted overwhelmingly for the SNP in 2019, the party’s vote plunged among the Disillusioned Nationalists in 2024 and they are now the most likely of any segment to say they will not vote. The few voters considering backing Alba are largely in this group. They say the cost of living is the most important issue by some margin, and tend to disagree that a pro-independence Holyrood majority would be a mandate for another referendum. They are unenthusiastic about the SNP government’s record and deeply pessimistic about the economy, both for themselves and the country.

Full report and data tables at LordAshcroftPolls.com

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Newly discovered film gives extraordinary first hand account of the General Strike

Published

on

Newly discovered film gives extraordinary first hand account of the General Strike

A newly discovered documentary film provides an extraordinary first-hand account of the General Strike of 1926. And it shows how close many of the strikers thought it brought them to a revolution.

This historic documentary, The General Strike – A Revolution Betrayed?, made in the early 1970s, was unearthed in the archive of radical filmmaker Platform Films.

Norman Thomas of Platform Films says that the power of the 70 minute film lies in its extensive use of first hand testimony of strikers and strikers’ relatives.

Thomas said:

Advertisement

This is the General Strike of 1926 as told by the people who actually lived through it. The film vividly illustrates how the strike was opposed by the full force of the British establishment but how close the strikers felt they came to success.

He added:

Many strikers believed they were on the verge of a revolution – a revolution that only failed because they were betrayed by union leaders.

It’s been a hundred years since workers across the country come out in support of over a million miners locked out of work for refusing to accept lower pay. Thomas claims the film contains vital lessons for present day trade unionists.

He said:

The film highlights the importance of rank and file solidarity across industries, highly disciplined grassroots organisation – and a deep distrust of union leaders!

The film also provides a unique insight into the human impact of the General Strike – an aspect, Thomas argues, that’s had too little coverage.

Advertisement

He said:

The film shows how people came out of the strike devastated. Whole communities were in pieces. The failure of the strike was a hugely traumatic event.

And Thomas added:

Watching the film, you get a real sense of how close the strike came to success. If it had succeeded, the strike would have undoubtedly changed the course of British history.

Award-winning radical filmmaker Platform Films has made the documentary available for screenings and viewings. You can get a copy of the film on memory stick, DVD or via an online link. The cost to institutions, including trades union councils, is £60. For individuals and union branches the cost is £20. There is no additional charge for screening the film publicly but donations are welcome. Email [email protected] for more details.

Watch a trailer of the film on YouTube.

Advertisement

Featured image via Platform Films

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

BMA staff announce further walkout for same day as resident doctors’ strike

Published

on

BMA staff announce further walkout for same day as resident doctors' strike

British Medical Association (BMA) staff have set further strike dates for Monday 6 and Tuesday 7 April. These will coincide with the start of the six-day resident doctors’ strike on 7 April.

The first round of BMA strikes kicks off this week, on Friday 27 and Saturday 28 March.

Like the resident doctors, BMA staff are in dispute with their employer over years of sub-inflationary pay awards, which have seen staff pay eroded by almost 17%.

The BMA’s most recent pay offer to its staff of 2.75% is lower than the latest doctors’ and dentists’ pay review body recommendation of 3.5% to resident doctors. The BMA described that as a “crushing blow” to doctors.

Advertisement

Hundreds of staff, who are represented by GMB Union, recently voted 96% to strike on an 80% turnout.

Many doctor BMA members have shared public messages of solidarity with the staff.

Gavin Davies, GMB senior organiser, said:

These strikes have laid bare the BMA’s ongoing hypocrisy. Our members want to focus on doing what they do best: supporting their members at work.

But just like the resident doctors they support, they cannot continue to accept another year of pay erosion while the cost of living continues to spiral.

Advertisement

We are urging the BMA to come back to the table with a constructive offer that recognises our members’ value.

Picket details for BMA staff strikes on Friday 27 March:

  • London 8am-2pm: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JP.
  • Belfast 11am: BMA Northern Ireland, Urban HQ, Eagle Star House, 5-7 Upper Queen Street, Belfast, BT1 6FB.
  • Cardiff 10am-12pm: BMA Cymru Wales, 2 Caspian Point, Caspian Way, Cardiff Bay, Cardiff, CF10 4DQ.
  • Edinburgh 10.30am-12pm: BMA Scotland, 14 Queen Street, Edinburgh EH2 1LL.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Jennifer Garner Is Remaking 13 Going On 30 With A New ‘Magical Pairing’

Published

on

Jennifer Garner Is Remaking 13 Going On 30 With A New 'Magical Pairing'

With the last few years offering up a musical re-do of Mean Girls, a Legally Blonde prequel series, two Avatar follow-ups, a new TV adaptation of Harry Potter, a long-awaited sequel to The Devil Wears Prada and planned revivals of Pirates Of The Caribbean and The Lord Of The Rings, appetite for 2000s movies is clearly showing no sign of waning.

It’s now been announced that another classic from around the turn of the millennium is being given the remake treatment, with a new version of 13 Going On 30 in the works at Netflix.

The film’s original star Jennifer Garner will serve as an executive producer on the project, which will star People We Meet On Vacation’s Emily Bader and The Perks Of Being A Wallflower’s Logan Lerman as its romantic leads.

Director Brett Haley told Deadline: “13 Going On 30 is one of those rare, perfect films. Funny, emotional, deeply human, with unforgettable performances from Jennifer Garner, Mark Ruffalo and Judy Greer.

Advertisement

“I’m a longtime fan, so stepping into this reimagining comes with tremendous responsibility. Jennifer Garner being on board as an executive producer, after playing such a big part of what made the original special, is especially meaningful.”

He added: “I also couldn’t be more excited to reunite with Emily Bader after People We Meet On Vacation. She and the amazingly talented Logan Lerman are a magical pairing. I feel incredibly lucky to be trusted with something that means so much to so many people.”

The original 13 Going On 30 centres around a teenage girl who is granted a wish to fast-forward to her life at 30 years old, with no memory of the 17 years that have passed.

Jennifer starred as Jenna Rink in the rom-com, with Mark Ruffalo playing her love interest Matty Flamhaff, while the supporting cast included Judy Greer, Andy Serkis and Phil Reeves.

Advertisement

13 Going On 13 is currently streaming on Prime Video.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Channel 5 Execs Explain Huw Edwards Drama Power’s Surreal Ending

Published

on

Channel 5 Execs Explain Huw Edwards Drama Power's Surreal Ending

The executives behind 5’s new drama about Huw Edwards have opened up about the show’s surreal final moments.

Power: The Downfall Of Huw Edwards aired on Tuesday night, starring Martin Clunes as the disgraced former BBC News presenter.

While the feature-length drama opened with a recreation of Edwards announcing the news of Queen Elizabeth II’s death to the nation, in what was intended to serve as a reminder of the position of authority he held before he became embroiled in scandal, it ended with an imagined news broadcast featuring him reporting on his own fall from grace.

On Tuesday, Variety published an interview with 5 commissioners Guy Davies in which they reflected on how these book-end scenes came to be.

Advertisement

Testar said the opening sequence highlighted that “there is no more trusted emblem of the establishment in our society than the person who’s given the responsibility of telling the public that the Queen had died”.

Davies agreed: “[Edwards was] incredibly trusted by the public, and in a way, that trust became a bit of a metaphor in the film, because that’s also about power and the abuse of power. And that’s why I think it’s such an interesting story…”

Testar said that the idea for the final scene wasn’t in “the very first draft” but arose “pretty early on” in the creative process.

“It felt like a very important thing to end the story on, to remind the audience what the scale and detail of Edward’s crimes were,” he claimed, with Davies adding: “And being, you know, finally accountable to the public in the medium which he worked in.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform MPs Storm Out Of Commons As Farage Calls PM ‘Waste Of Space’

Published

on

Reform MPs Storm Out Of Commons As Farage Calls PM 'Waste Of Space'

Reform UK MPs angrily stormed out of the House of Commons during prime minister’s questions today after an exchange with Keir Starmer.

The eight parliamentarians dramatically left the chamber after party leader Nigel Farage asked the prime minister about his promise to “smash” the people-smuggling gangs.

“Is it not time to admit that smash the gangs has been total abject failure, along frankly with most of his other policies?” Farage said. “Isn’t it now time that he told us, as summer approaches, what is plan B?”

When Starmer dodged the question and turned his response back onto Reform’s recent U-turns over the Iran war, Farage and his colleagues chose to walk out.

Advertisement

Another MP in the chamber told HuffPost UK that the MP for Clacton called Starmer a “waste of space” as he was leaving.

“Farage lost his temper,” the MP said, while also claiming that Reform MP Andrew Rosindell “didn’t want to leave”.

The walkout occurred after the prime minister claimed Farage wants to “exploit” the country’s problems, not solve them.

Starmer said: “This is the man of the party who voted against giving law-enforcement counter-terrorism to tackle them.

Advertisement

“He wants the grievance, he doesn’t want it sorted.

“He then said let’s join the war – a week later, a screeching U-turn, we don’t want to go to war – and he says, trust his judgement.

“It’s hard to take anything he says seriously. He promised lower tax and now Reform councils are hiking tax by 9%.”

He pointed out that Farage also said he wished Reform “hadn’t bothered” to win the Worcestershire council earlier this month because it’s bankrupt.

Advertisement

The PM continued: “He asks for people’s votes and then he abandons them. Reform don’t want to solve problems, they only want to exploit them.”

He called the party an “absolute disgrace”.

Reform’s departure from the packed Commons caused a huge amount of laughter from their fellow MPs.

In a following question about snooker, the prime minister then joked: “I see Reform have walked out – they obviously realised they’re absolutely snookered!”

Advertisement

Reform MP Sarah Pochin later wrote on X: “Yet another disgraceful performance from the prime minister today at PMQs. Why won’t you answer the question, Keir Starmer?”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Nottingham killings have exposed a broken Britain

Published

on

The Nottingham killings have exposed a broken Britain

On 13 June 2023, Valdo Calocane, a paranoid schizophrenic, fatally stabbed three people in the centre of Nottingham. Over the past four weeks, I have been closely following the Nottingham Inquiry – a public investigation into how Calocane, a violent psychotic and known risk to the public, was ever in a position to roam the streets freely. The inquiry has also looked at the response to Calocane’s murders – including the terrible treatment of the victim’s families by our institutions, from the police to the local authority. If ever there was a case that encapsulated a truly broken Britain, it is the story of Valdo Calocane.

Barnaby Webber and Grace O’Malley-Kumar, two 19-year-old students at the University of Nottingham, were Calocane’s first victims. It was 4am and the two friends were walking back to their student accommodation, having been out celebrating the end of term. They were nearly home when Calocane, who had been hiding in a nearby alleyway, attacked them on the street. Both were fatally stabbed before, according to a judicial summary, the killer ‘calmly’ left the scene.

Calocane’s next victim was Ian Coates, a 65-year-old school caretaker. He was stabbed 15 times. Calocane left Coates’s body on the street before stealing his van and driving into the centre of Nottingham, where he attempted to mow down three members of the public in two separate incidents. Miraculously, all three survived, but not without significant injuries. In 2024, Calocane was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order, having had his charges downgraded to manslaughter on the grounds of his mental illness.

Advertisement

A month into the inquiry, one thing is crystal clear: Coates, Webber and O’Malley-Kumar were killed by Calocane, but they were failed by the British state. Calocane had been dangerously unwell for many years: in 2020, when he began to experience his first bouts of violent psychosis, health officials declined to section him because of the ‘over-representation of young black men in prison’. The Nottingham NHS Mental Health Care Trust, who became primarily responsible for Calocane’s care, did not administer anti-psychotic medication because of his fear of needles.

Despite his increasingly aggressive behaviour, which included forcing a neighbour to jump from her first-floor balcony after he broke in the door, Calocane remained at large. Prior to his fatal attacks, he assaulted police officers, emergency workers, flatmates and colleagues. He stalked strangers and repeatedly tried to break into neighbouring properties. At the time of the attack, he was the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Even without these frightening outbursts, the very nature of Calocane’s thoughts should have been enough to suggest that he posed a grave risk to society. He believed that he was being spied on by MI6. He ‘heard voices’ that told him his family was going to die – voices that he believed were the ‘creation of mental-health services’. In 2021, Calocane even travelled to Thames House in London, the headquarters of MI5, asking to be arrested. How was this man ever allowed to roam the streets?

The negligence and incompetence of the responsible authorities does not end there. Over the past few days, we have learnt harrowing details of how the victims’ families were treated by Nottinghamshire Police and Nottingham City Council. Coates’s body, we heard, was left on the road for 15 hours. His son was notified of his death on Instagram after receiving a message from a family friend. Inexplicably, the inquiry has also heard that Coates’s three sons were excluded from a vigil organised by the council – a memorial they had only been made aware of after receiving an inquiry from a journalist.

Advertisement

The conduct of the police has been exposed as truly scandalous. Multiple officers involved in the case were found to have spent an inappropriate amount of time looking at pictures and footage related to the crimes. The consequent misconduct hearing was concealed from the families. Bizarrely, the families were kept apart by the police throughout Calocane’s trial. Each family was told that the other preferred privacy when, in fact, the opposite was true – they were desperate to connect with one another, and have since formed incredibly close bonds.

Nottingham is not the same place after Calocane’s crimes. Each victim represented something unique about the city I grew up in and where I continue to live. Coates was an avid fisherman and Nottingham Forest supporter – a classic Nottingham bloke. He was a loving father and grandfather. The school he was travelling to on the morning of his death, where he worked as a janitor, was the same school my son attended. Webber and O’Malley-Kumar were doing what all Nottingham students do – enjoying the nightlife that has become part of the city’s character.

Walking through Nottingham on any day of the week you will encounter people with serious drug and alcohol problems. This once-proud metropolis, a former centre of British industry, is now littered with the tents and sleeping bags of its many homeless residents. At times, it feels as though, everywhere you look, all you see are people with serious mental-health issues – whether they are asking you for money, or merely shouting into the ether. Nottingham, like so many towns and cities now feels abandoned and unsafe. I no longer feel proud of Nottingham, the city I grew up in and where I continue to live.

Advertisement

Nottingham City Council has, perhaps wisely, said nothing throughout the inquiry. A few weeks ago, however, it saw fit to share the fact that it has been awarded the ‘Purple Flag’ award for safe cities on its Facebook account. This was on the same day the inquiry uncovered the extent of Calocane’s violence during a previous arrest. Its lack of sensitivity and awareness was sadly symbolic of the state’s failures that have been reinforced over the past four weeks.

Either through neglect or design, UK institutions are failing to keep people safe. This has been one of the most glaring facts exposed throughout the last four weeks. And, when tragedy does occur, it is families that carry the load in getting justice – whether it is Hillsborough, Grenfell or Nottingham, the state’s first response is always to protect itself.

We must never forget Valdo Calocane’s victims. But it is also our duty not to let the authorities who enabled his crimes off the hook. We must not tolerate Broken Britain any longer.

Advertisement

Lisa McKenzie is a working-class academic.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Savannah Guthrie: ‘We Are In Agony’

Published

on

Savannah Guthrie: ‘We Are In Agony’

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”6f363d0b-13e2-471b-bb49-05f14dbf32b4″}).render(“69c4263ee4b018d43a5a35a4”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

England’s football regulator has already gone woke

Published

on

England’s football regulator has already gone woke

The post England’s football regulator has already gone woke appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform UK Asked Opponent To Be Paper Candidate In Elections

Published

on

Reform UK Asked Opponent To Be Paper Candidate In Elections

A Lib Dem councillor was left stunned after being asked by Reform UK to stand for the party at the local elections in May.

Sam Webber, who sits on Bromley Council in south east London, was phoned out of the blue by the party’s membership team and asked if he wanted to be a “paper candidate” on May 7.

A paper candidate is someone whose name goes on the ballot representing a party but is not expected to win or do any campaigning.

Speaking to HuffPost UK, Webber accused Nigel Farage’s party of “making a mockery of the election nomination process”.

Advertisement

He said: “Is Reform just randomly calling up people across the country and asking them to stand for election?

“Nominations open in five days time. How much vetting will the party be doing on their candidates in that time? This runs the risk people getting nominated who would be ineligible to serve even if they were elected.

“That would see costly and unnecessary by-elections having to take place after May 7, as we saw after the 2025 local elections.

“Reform UK is making a mockery of the election nomination process. As we have seen in authorities like Kent County Council, it would be total chaos if the party gets anywhere near power. I suspect voters will not like being taken for fools.”

Advertisement

Reform has been contacted for comment.

A staggering 65 Reform councillors who were elected at last May’s local elections have since either resigned as councillors, defected or quit the party.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Salah leaves Liverpool with an unbelievable legacy

Published

on

Salah leaves Liverpool with an unbelievable legacy

Egyptian star Mohamed Salah has announced he will be leaving Liverpool at the end of the season, bringing to a close one of the greatest eras in the club’s history and a golden age in the Premier League.

Mohamed Salah is not just a departing player; he represents the end of an exceptional career that has inspired the club and fans worldwide.

Unprecedented

When Salah arrived at Anfield in the summer of 2017 from Roma for around $50 million, it seemed like just another big-money move. But the next few years proved that the club hadn’t signed an ordinary player, but an unprecedented football phenomenon.

His journey to the top wasn’t easy. He had a disappointing spell at Chelsea before rediscovering his form in Italy and returning to England as a more complete player, finding in Jürgen Klopp’s project the perfect environment to flourish.

Advertisement

From his very first season, Salah established himself as a formidable attacking force, scoring 44 goals and announcing the birth of the ‘Egyptian King.’

During his nine seasons with Liverpool, he scored 255 goals in 435 appearances, placing him third on the club’s all-time top scorers list. He also contributed 281 goals in the Premier League, the most by any player for a single club. He won the Golden Boot four times, equaling Thierry Henry’s record, confirming his dominance and consistent goal-scoring prowess.

His impact wasn’t limited to individual statistics; it extended to major titles. He was instrumental in Liverpool’s triumphs, securing eight significant trophies: two Premier League titles, a Champions League title, an FA Cup, two League Cups, a Club World Cup, and a UEFA Super Cup. The highlight of his career was winning the Champions League in 2019, following the heartbreak of the 2018 Kyiv final, when he scored in the final against Tottenham and led the team to European glory.

An enduring legacy

Salah’s impact wasn’t limited to the pitch; it extended to the human dimension as well. He went through difficult times, most notably the death of his teammate Diogo Jota, and witnessed some tensions within the team, but the relationship between the player and the club remained based on respect and achievement.

Advertisement

When Mohamed Salah leaves, it’s not just a goal-scoring player who departs, but an entire chapter in the club’s modern history closes. A player who transformed Liverpool, inspired fans around the world, and etched his name in gold. The legacy of the “Egyptian King” will live on, etched in the memory of Anfield and in the heart of every fan, forever. Mohamed Salah was more than just a goalscorer; he wass an entire era in Liverpool’s history.

Salah’s extensive achievements with Liverpool

• Most Premier League goals by an African player: 189

• Most assists by an African player: 92

• Most Premier League goals as a winger: 190

Advertisement

• Most Premier League goals with his left foot: 152

• Most goal contributions in a 38-game season: 47

• Most goals in a single season with Liverpool: 44

• Most goal contributions against Manchester United: 19

Advertisement

• Most goal contributions in a single month: 14

• Most goal contributions for a single club: 281

• Premier League Golden Boot: 4 times

• Player of the Month: 7 times

Advertisement

• More Liverpool’s Premier League goals: 189

• Most Champions League goals for an English club: 45

• Liverpool’s all-time Champions League top scorer: 50

• First player to have over 40 goal contributions in two seasons

Advertisement

• First player to have 10+ goal contributions in three months

• Only player to score a hat-trick at Old Trafford

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025