Nigel Farage has speculated that Ann Widdecombe was the victim of “premeditated murder”. He’s attracting controversy for the statement; especially because he also said ‘it doesn’t pay to speculate’ at this time:

Devon and Cornwall Police: “We would ask people not to speculate about what might have happened, particularly on social media.”

Nigel Farage: “From what I can see of it, from what I can make out, this was premeditated murder.”

— Ben Kentish (@BenKentish) July 11, 2026

Advertisement

Speculation

On 10 July, Joe Glenton reported the following of Widdecombe:

A 26-year-old white male suspect has been arrested after former Tory minister and Reform UK politician Ann Widdecombe was found dead. She was an MP for over two decades and was known for her far-right and homophobic views.

The police have since released the suspect. It wasn’t speculation to report on the above, though, because it was reported by the police that they’d made the arrest. The following from Farage, however, is most certainly speculation:

From what I make out, this was premeditated murder. Whether it was politically motivated, whether it was someone with a grudge. I don’t think it pays at this time to speculate

We understand the 24-hour news cycle encourages this sort of thing from media figures. Take this from Mike Graham, for instance, who was a presenter on TalkTV until they sacked him over a racist social media post:

All pointing towards a police cover-up right now… https://t.co/GvM4pwLHXJ

— Mike Graham (@Iromg) July 11, 2026

Generally, it’s understood that politicians should hold themselves to a higher standard. We’re not sure anyone would expect this from Farage, of course, given his many ongoing scandals, but still.

Farage just can’t respect the wishes of the family and the request of the police : ie not to speculate

He’s feeding speculation for his own perceived political advantage

Just like he always does https://t.co/hjtIJLZsmk

— Bruce McD (@brucemcd23) July 11, 2026

As Ben Kentish noted in a tweet:

Devon and Cornwall Police: “We have made the active decision not to release further information…Releasing such information prematurely could compromise ongoing enquiries and may prejudice future investigative opportunities.”

Nigel Farage: “The car went onto the drive at approximately 12.30pm on Wednesday.”

Farage is openly just engaging in theorising too, saying:

One theory doing the rounds is that it was a burglary gone wrong. But a car went onto the drive at approximately 12.25-12.30 on Wednesday. She had done one interview in the morning… She was due to do another one at 1pm. So if you were a burglar, would you literally drive your car onto someone’s drive?

Farage and his big mouth

Farage is making it increasingly clear that he’s not fit to hold higher office. Whether it’s the many donation scandals or his loose lips, the man simply cannot behave himself. And while we’re often in favour of a little anarchic behaviour, that’s not the case when said behaviour solely benefits billionaire backers and dodgy donors.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

Rabidly Israel-first US senator Lindsey Graham has died aged 71. His office described his death as coming after a “brief and sudden” illness.

Graham was one of the more unhinged US politicians, even among Trump supporters. Irredeemably Israel-first, he even threatened a US invasion of the International Criminal Court over its arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu.

Lindsey Graham — Shameless genocider

Graham was a shameless supporter of Israel’s genocide in Gaza, though he would never have admitted it is a genocide. His comments make clear he had no concern whatsoever for Israel’s hundreds of thousands of Palestinian victims:

“I am with Israel. Do whatever the hell you have to do.”

“Level the place.”

“Do in Gaza what we did in Tokyo and Berlin.”

Lindsey Graham had just visited a Ukrainian killer-drone factory, where he had toured weapons the manufacturer has developed to try to protect Israel from Iranian ‘Shahed’ drones and other retaliation.

Graham’s fellow Israel-firster, 84-year-old Senate leader Mitch McConnell, is also believed to have died. However, his office appears to be delaying confirming the death, potentially for political reasons. McConnell’s sheet-covered body was reportedly rolled “without urgency” into an ambulance late last week.

Muslim humanitarian Omar Suleiman responded to news of Graham’s death by wishing him an eternity of what he helped inflict on Gaza:

Bye Lindsey. May you live an eternity in ruins for the ruins you helped create in Gaza. Ameen

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Source link

Mainstream outlets have been shining a light on Reform UK and Nigel Farage’s finances over the past month. Last week, this saw the Times covering the criminal aristocrat ‘Posh George’ Cottrell, who was providing Farage with various benefits in the runup to the 2024 election. Now, the Times are reporting Cottrell may also have made undisclosed donations to Reform UK:

EXCL by @ManuMidolo ft me @venetiamenzies @GeorgeGreenwood

The criminal who funded Nigel Farage made undisclosed donations to Reform in apparent breach of electoral law

George Cottrell lawyers at Carter Ruck refuse to say when he became permissible donor https://t.co/yFEalCjDdr

Advertisement

— Gabriel Pogrund (@Gabriel_Pogrund) July 12, 2026

Posh George

Farage has multiple ongoing scandals right now, including:

• Multiple investigations into a £5m gift he received from a crypto billionaire.
• Accusations he’s shilling for crypto on behalf of his donors.
• Questions over three houses he seemingly failed to declare.

The controversies for Farage multiplied over the past week, with the following hitting mainstream attention:

• Failure to declare financial support from convicted fraudster Posh George in the runup to the 2024 election.
• Revelation that Posh George had Reform UK business cards despite the claim he wasn’t involved with the party.
• Police probe into a £500k donation from Posh George’s mother to Reform UK (suspected to be from Posh George himself).

There’s also this:

I've been saying for nearly a year that this was money laundering. https://t.co/mEADwybqWI

— Mr Ethical (@nw_nicholas) July 12, 2026

Oh, and this isn’t a scandal per se, but it came out that Posh George refers to Farage as ‘daddy’. Make of that what you will.

Reform UK — Undeclared

In the latest on the Posh George affair, the Times are reporting:

George Cottrell used his own money to cover office costs totalling thousands of pounds for Reform after the last election and as recently as last year, sources have told Insight.

The crypto-gambler repeatedly used his personal bank card to buy computer tools and software to be used by the party’s staff. However, none of the donations were declared to the Electoral Commission as required by legislation.

Advertisement

A party can be fined for failing to disclose such support under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000, which stipulates that a donation includes money, goods or services given free or at a discount exceeding £500 in value.

Posh George is a convicted fraudster, and may not have been a permissible donor at the time that he made some of the above donations. This is because Cottrell is a tax resident of Montenegro; the base of the crypto-gambling platform he’s involved with. While he is on the list of registered overseas voters, he’s only been on said since last December.

Reform UK describes Cottrell as a volunteer. Contrary to this, the Times are now reporting that Cottrell has been intimately involved with the party:

However, Insight can now reveal that as well as buying office equipment for the party, Cottrell has long had personal access to Farage’s party email and had his own desk next to the leader’s private office at party headquarters at Millbank, Westminster.

Additionally:

The insiders said he sat either with Farage in his personal office at headquarters or in a quad of desks in a room directly next to it, and claim he was involved in political and fundraising matters at the very highest level.

Mainstream attention

Because of how the right of reply process works, Reform UK knew this raft of stories were coming out. As such, this may explain Farage’s big by-election stunt. It’s unclear why the Reform leader felt a need to step down from his Clacton seat only to run in the race to reclaim it. Such a move could have worked as a distraction; it’s just failing to do so because there are too many scandals to distract from.

This, then, is why Farage panicked last week. He knew it was all about to unravel. This whole stunt was a desperate attempt to get ahead of it.

Remarkable. He's literally self-destructed. https://t.co/yyvUUURpt2

— Tom Bacon (@TomABacon) July 11, 2026

Advertisement

We should note we’re using phrases like ‘mainstream attention’ for a reason, and it’s that independent journalists have been covering this stuff for years. As Don McGowan of No Holds Barred Pod said:

So many people had this story for years before the Times picked it up.@BylineTimes and @carolecadwalla were writing about George Cottrell over five years ago.

The difference is that the Murdochs have made an executive decision that they've finally had enough of Farage. https://t.co/E21vc3i2G1

Advertisement

— Don McGowan (@donmcgowan) July 5, 2026

Carole Cadwalladr speculated that her reporting was ignored for the following reasons:

Reported while female.

Didn’t work for a right-wing newspaper.

Advertisement

Dismissed & ridiculed by men who did.

Gaslit for a decade.

Sued through the courts.

But I’m not the loser here.

Advertisement

This decade of denial has caused Britain irreparable harm.

This isn’t to say the establishment media and their considerable resources aren’t unearthing new information; it’s to say this stuff would have come out years ago if the will had been there.

Reform’s undisclosed money is piling up

If Nigel Farage had a penny for every ongoing scandal, he’d have enough money to stop taking undisclosed lump sums from foreign-based crypto billionaires. Well, maybe not that much, but only because the lump sums in question have been in the millions.

Things aren’t looking good for Reform UK, anyway, as even their voters are noticing the stench of corruption:

Nigel Farage named sleaziest politician in UK in new poll – and even Reform voters think ithttps://t.co/s41LFydTs9

— Reform UK Exposed (@reformexposed) July 11, 2026

Nigel Farage's Approval Ratings Plummet Amid Row Over His Financeshttps://t.co/uWGZk9O7c6?

— Reform UK Exposed (@reformexposed) July 12, 2026

We’re not sure how much longer this can go on for, but we doubt it’s all the way to 2029 electoral success.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

A viewer watching Lionel Messi for the first time might think the Argentine captain has drifted out of the match. He avoids constant pressing and chasing.

Instead, he spends long periods walking or standing to watch his surroundings. This approach defies the high-tempo, continuous pressure demands of modern football.

But behind this image that suggests calmness lies one of the most complex tactical ideas in the game. Walking is no longer just about conserving energy.

It is now part of his philosophy for managing the game. He reads the play carefully before deciding when to act.

This economy of movement allows him to wait for the critical moment where he can make a decisive impact.

FIFA tracking data, featured in a report by The Athletic, shows that Messi walked for 64% of his time during the World Cup.

This was the highest percentage among all outfield players in the tournament. He spent roughly 25% of his time standing or moving very little.

He ran for only 8.6% of the time, compared to the 23% tournament average.

Despite these numbers, the Argentine captain was not far from impact. By the end of the Round of 16, he was a joint-top scorer with eight goals.

He created 15 clear scoring chances and ranked third in touches within the attacking third. He also received the ball 97 times between the opponent’s midfield and defensive lines.

This high rate confirms that low movement does not equate to low effectiveness.

The information gathering phase

In traditional football, walking is seen as being absent from the match events, but Messi deals with it in a completely different way.

When he appears detached from play, he is busy reading defender movements. He monitors gaps between lines to identify players out of position and spaces that will open up later.

Pep Guardiola once noted that Messi spends the match’s opening minutes observing everything. He draws a mental map of opponent movements before he begins exploiting their weaknesses.

Once the ball reaches him, he has already formed a complete picture of everyone’s locations, making the decision-making faster than the defenders’ own reactions.

This philosophy explains why he runs sparingly. He avoids wasting energy chasing the ball, saving it instead for moments when an attack becomes a genuine scoring opportunity.

Many used to explain Messi’s genius by his technical abilities or dribbling skills, but the experiences of the best defenders in the world reveal another side of his superiority.

Raphaël Varane has faced Messi over twenty times. He notes that the hardest part of marking him is not his dribbling, but his positioning where defenders are unsure who should cover him.

He moves calmly between lines into a “gray zone.” Center-backs hesitate to step out, midfielders don’t advance to mark him, and fullbacks refuse to leave their positions.

During these few seconds of hesitation, Messi has already received the ball and started the attack that is difficult to stop.

Former defender William Gallas believes man-to-man marking Messi is a gift. A defender leaving their position simply grants Messi’s teammates the space they need.

Conserving energy

At thirty-nine, Messi no longer has the explosive speed of his early Barcelona days. Instead, he manages his physical effort differently.

Tournament data shows that 71% of his sprints occur in the attacking third. Another 21% end inside the penalty area. He only runs when scoring chances are high.

Every sprint is a calculated decision rather than raw physical effort. Running has become his tool for finishing attacks, not for building them from the start.

This style imposes extra burdens on his teammates, especially during pressing and ball recovery. However, the team seems fully convinced of this trade-off.

Pablo Zabaleta, of the FIFA Technical Study Group, says teammates run more to preserve their captain’s energy. They know his genius can decide a match in a single moment.

That’s why his teammates do not see his lack of running as a burden, but rather as an investment in the player most capable of making the difference.

Messi — Redefining greatness

Modern football long associated the best player with running, pressing, and covering space. Messi presents a completely different model.

Greatness, in his case, is not measured by the number of kilometers he covers, but by the quality of the moment he chooses to move. He doesn’t win matches with a multitude of steps, but with the precision of the single step that changes everything.

Therefore, he might seem, in the eyes of many, outside the match atmosphere, while in reality, he is the player most occupied with the match.

He observes, analyzes, and redraws everyone’s positions in his mind, waiting for the moment to pounce on the appropriate space.

Lionel Messi has turned walking into a smart tactical weapon. This proves that speed of thought is more valuable than foot speed. The calmest player often has the greatest influence.

Featured image via the Canary

By Alaa Shamali

Source link

According to Quds News Network, sources claim the Palestinian Authority (PA) has begun providing medical treatment for members of armed groups in Gaza accused of collaborating with “Israel” — admitting them to hospitals in the occupied West Bank.

Palestinian Authority treats collaborators with “Israel” in its hospitals

This follows the Zionist regime’s refusal to receive wounded members of these militia groups at hospitals inside “Israel.” Instead, the Palestinian sources claim the PA coordinated the collaborators’ transfer to hospitals under its administration, where they received medical care and logistical support.

One of the wounded fighters, who is identified only by the initials “S.D.,” was reportedly admitted to a hospital in Ramallah under the alias “Ahmed.” He suffered a severe head injury, including a fractured skull. The sources say he is affiliated with the militia group led by Ghassan al-Dahini. This operates in the Rafah area of the southern Gaza Strip. The individual is said to have been wounded during an ambush carried out by resistance security forces in Gaza. It resulted in multiple members of the group being killed or injured.

Anti-Hamas militia members use aliases in hospital but PA aware of this

A senior Palestinian Authority official is said to have coordinated the patient’s admission to the hospital. Dozens of wounded individuals linked to these anti-Hamas militias have been received by hospitals and hotels across the occupied West Bank. The sources claim that many of these have been registered under false identities rather than their legal names. And this practice has taken place with the prior knowledge of officials within the PA.

According to analysis by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED), at least five “Israeli”-backed armed groups have become increasingly active since late 2025. They mainly operate from occupation-controlled areas near the “Yellow Line.”

These groups have taken part in armed confrontations with Hamas-affiliated security forces. They have also carried out targeted assassinations of Hamas police and senior security officials, and detained members of Hamas. Civilians known to have collaborated with the resistance have also been abducted and killed by these militias.

Israeli occupation supports these militias

The occupation’s wider strategy is to support local groups that can challenge Hamas. It also aims to reduce the need for Israeli occupation forces (IOF) on the ground. So “Israel” provides support for these anti-Hamas militias, by giving them weapons, intelligence, logistics, training, and operational protection.

The aim of the Zionist regime is to weaken Hamas’ control by backing rival groups. But ACLED argues “Israel’s” continued empowerment of anti-Hamas groups increases divisions among Palestinians. It also makes clashes between Palestinian groups more likely. This will make it much more difficult for a single, united Palestinian leadership to emerge in Gaza.

Featured image via leMonde

By Charlie Jaay

Source link

On 9 July, Andy Burnham issued a statement regarding ‘Labour’s stance on Gaza‘. In it, our incoming PM refused to call Israel’s actions a genocide, and did little to differentiate his position from that of Keir Starmer. Accordingly, Canary writer Joe Glenton described the statement as “milquetoast sop“. And he wasn’t the only one to notice Burnham is trying to pull the wool over our eyes:

@andyburnham is a coward.

He apologised for the position this Labour Government has taken on Palestine but He won’t call it a Genocide, he hides behind international law.
He won’t commit to Sanctioning Israel.
He won’t commit the British government to stop sharing intelligence… pic.twitter.com/SCJyrSTkn1

— Mothin Ali (@MothinAli) July 12, 2026

Advertisement

The “coward” Burnham

His Gaza statement included the following line:

I have been absolutely appalled by what I’ve seen and read about the destruction of Gaza. There’s increasing evidence that war crimes appear to have been committed.

And also this:

There must be accountability for the depth of the suffering the people of Gaza have experienced. Ultimately, however, it must be for the international courts to determine, rather than politicians.

There’s clearly a double standard here; one which suggests Burnham will ultimately fail to deliver on opposing Israel:

Compare and contrast.

Andy Burnham says Russia has committed war crimes in Ukraine. But when it comes to Gaza, he only says war crimes appear to have been committed, and he doesn't name by who. He also says its up to the courts to determine, not politicians. pic.twitter.com/Rxt0mYSZ1h

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) July 11, 2026

This is no surprise, of course, as we’ve been reporting:

In recent days, Andy Burnham has been vocal about Ukraine, but quiet about Palestine. Like Hope not Hate, the double-standard is telling

by @jodymcintyre_https://t.co/MglnoM7J3X

— Canary (@TheCanaryUK) May 28, 2026

Advertisement

It’s also the case that Burnham and his key appointees are in the foreign influence operation known as ‘Labour Friends of Israel’. As Ranjan Balakumaran reported for the Canary:

Andy Burnham has spent years crafting a specific public myth. He is the ‘King of the North,’ the casual jacket-wearing, anti-Westminster populist who promised to smash the Whitehall bubble, reverse decades of devastating de-industrialization, and bring failing water utilities back under public control.

​But as he prepares to enter Downing Street as Prime Minister, the mask has officially slipped. Burnham has handed the keys of Number 10 to his new Chief of Staff, James Purnell—the ex-chair of Labour Friends of Israel, a former BBC executive, and the CEO of Flint Global, an elite corporate lobbying outfit that protects private water companies from state takeovers and was recently sold to a private equity firm notorious for price-gouging the NHS.

Speaking out

In full, Mothin Ali said:

[Andy Burnham] is a coward.

He apologised for the position this Labour Government has taken on Palestine but He won’t call it a Genocide, he hides behind international law.
He won’t commit to Sanctioning Israel.

He won’t commit the British government to stop sharing intelligence and resources with Israel and he won’t commit the RAF To stop doing spy flights over Gaza.

What he forgets is the minute you suspect a genocide we have an obligation to take steps and save lives.

Just like he forgets that Greater Manchester doesn’t just mean growth in the centre but for every community that feels left behind, like Wigan, like Rochdale, like Bolton. All our communities should to be protected.

Advertisement

That’s why we need [Greater Manchester mayor candidate Geraldine Coggins] and that’s the difference she will make.

Ali isn’t the only Green speaking out either:

Burnham talks as if the genocide in Gaza is in the past, but it's happening NOW. Britain is arming Israel NOW.

This UN report is from two weeks ago.

Advertisement

Burnham must commit to fully ending UK complicity NOW. pic.twitter.com/NtbBdPu8Hl

— Zack Polanski (@ZackPolanski) July 11, 2026

Prepare to be disappointed

This isn’t the only instance of Burnham trying to dupe voters:

Like when he hinted at nationalisation despite having no intention to deliver on that front, this hollow statement is going to make everyone madder than if he just said nothing https://t.co/HGJUKJMaGv

— Willem Moore (@willem_moore_uk) July 10, 2026

As we reported on 30 June:

When Andy Burnham unveiled his plan to run in the Makerfield by-election, the establishment media claimed he would renationalise utilities. Because we actually listened to what he was saying, we knew this wasn’t the case, and we pointed it out. Burnham himself disagreed with our assessment that he had no plan to end the privatisation nightmare. Now, Burnham has made it clear; his Labour government will not offer anything besides half measures:

Andy Burnham confirming he won't take our key infrastructure back into public ownership. pic.twitter.com/LjibtBuEdL

— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) June 29, 2026

Under Keir Starmer, voters got little besides cold gruel. Andy Burnham has run Starmer’s slop through the microwave for 30 seconds, but it’s still not warm, and it’s still f*cking gruel.

Featured image via the Canary

By Willem Moore

Source link

ITV sports hack Gabriel Clarke has rightly been lambasted for his appalling interviews after England beat Norway to reach the World Cup semi-finals.

The match followed the pattern of recent England performances: a frustrating, lacklustre performance rescued by moments of brilliance from, mostly, Jude Bellingham and Harry Kane. England manager Thomas Tuchel, while happy to get through and praising Bellingham’s performance his team’s mentality, was correctly dissatisfied with the latest repeat. Tuchel felt that England “made life hard for [ourselves]”.

ITV Clarke’s wind-up

And he had no patience for Clarke’s wind-up:

Horrendous interview from Gabriel Clarke post Norway vs England game

I would have let it slide if it was just Thomas Tuchel but him trying to bait Jude Bellingham after was disgraceful. Let the man enjoy the moment, he deserves it@gabrielclarke05 pic.twitter.com/VclXk4PEEH

Advertisement

— RGF (@rgfray1) July 12, 2026

Clarke then moved on to try to bait Bellingham, England’s star player on the night, appearing to want to drive a wedge between player and manager:

Gabriel Clarke should be removed from his football duties for this. absolutely insane to lie and stir animosity between the best player and the manager, all because the latter rightfully called your stupid question out https://t.co/F2GciahP64

— (@sliceinterlude) July 12, 2026

Fans weren’t slow to pick up on the ploy:

Gabriel Clarke has just epitomised the English media in 2 short interviews there. Absolutely abysmal questioning, going out his way to try and stir something up between tuchel and Bellingham proper WEIRD. #NORENG #ThreeLions

— Matty H (@OpTic_MH) July 12, 2026

Advertisement

And many called Clarke a “troublemaker” all too typical of UK ‘mainstream’ media, who should be removed because of it:

Gabriel Clarke trying to get a reaction from the incredible Jude Bellingham.

The UK public are starting to hate the UK Media.

And with good reason.

The pitch interviews are a waste of time and give opportunities for troublemakers like Clarke to sow doubt between players and…

Advertisement

— Pete Sanford (@PeteSanford) July 12, 2026

‘Get rid’

I struggle to understand how anybody can watch a Gabriel Clarke interview and believe he is a good reporter.

It is time to go. And long overdue at that.pic.twitter.com/5mFxLgq0Eu

— JP (@JP_FFC_) July 12, 2026

Some asked readers to take steps toward achieving it by complaining to the broadcaster:

How do we log a complaint about Gabriel Clarke and ITV?

— SG. (@S0uthernGe0rdie) July 12, 2026

The theme of ‘stirring division’ came up repeatedly:

Gabriel Clarke is an absolute disgrace, trying to stir up division between Tuchel and Jude. You know it’ll be all over the papers too. The media are absolute rats when they behave like that. They don’t want England to succeed

— ToweringZigic (@ToweringZigic) July 12, 2026

S***-stirrer

Some thought Clarke felt aggrieved by Tuchel’s dismissiveness of his nonsense and was trying to get payback:

Gabriel Clarke (the interviewer) can do one. He was so butthurt by the Tuchel interview that he took it upon himself to take the wind out of Bellingham’s sails by mentioning how disappointed Tuchel was. Awful interviewing. Really sad to watch.

— Alexandra Ayears (@AlexandraLawes) July 12, 2026

Some pointed out how Clarke could easily have relayed positives from the Tuchel interview to Bellingham but chose to emphasise the negative:

Gabriel Clarke should be removed from his football duties for this. absolutely insane to lie and stir animosity between the best player and the manager, all because the latter rightfully called your stupid question out https://t.co/F2GciahP64

— (@sliceinterlude) July 12, 2026

I implore you guys to watch this. Gabriel Clarke interviewed Tuchel before Bellingham & both occasions, he was rather provocative.

If he relays back to Jude that their mentality/commitment was praised, you wouldn’t see this reaction

Shocking interview pic.twitter.com/saQO1I96Zl https://t.co/BaHNm5IsHH

Advertisement

— C (@ctt_carys) July 12, 2026

Others agreed and essentially believed Clarke was doing it for clicks:

It could all have been handled so much better by Gabriel Clarke and instead, there’s now a storm in a teacup for absolutely no reason, going into one of the biggest games in English football’s living memory. https://t.co/KdPL1MS6de pic.twitter.com/gUZz6OThXJ

— HLTCO (@HLTCO) July 12, 2026

Bang on. Gabriel Clarke felt slighted/disrespected so decided to get his own back on Tuchel by stirring the pot with Bellingham.

Manufacturing a rift in the England team just before the semi-final because your ego got hurt is so selfish, petty and short-sighted. https://t.co/TI8xodjFXj

Advertisement

— Eddie Burfi (@EddieBurfi) July 12, 2026

And Clarke was accused of tarnishing one of English football’s greatest moments:

Only in England would our media seek to drive a wedge between the players and the manager in the run up to a SEMI FINAL. Gabriel Clarke should be ashamed of himself. https://t.co/5K8Y5ZP22R

— Sam Barrick (@SJ_Barrick) July 12, 2026

Tuchel, by contrast, was praised for his directness and not trying to gloss over the improvements needed:

I implore you guys to watch this. Gabriel Clarke interviewed Tuchel before Bellingham & both occasions, he was rather provocative.

If he relays back to Jude that their mentality/commitment was praised, you wouldn’t see this reaction

Shocking interview pic.twitter.com/saQO1I96Zl https://t.co/BaHNm5IsHH

— C (@ctt_carys) July 12, 2026

Love seeing Tuchel slaughter the interviewer there and being brutal of the performance. He’s the reason he was hired

— Neil Robertson OAM (@nr147) July 11, 2026

Advertisement

As this commenter suggests, if the FA wants to get through the semi-final – let alone win the World Cup – it should keep Clarke well away from its squad and management:

If the FA have anything about them the don’t let Gabriel Clarke near the team again. Clear what he was trying to do immediately with Tuchel. https://t.co/fjppvwgqnM

— Oliver (@OliverBerisford) July 12, 2026

But Clarke did serve one useful purpose: shining a spotlight on the general awfulness of UK ‘MSM’. If only UK people would wake up as a whole to that in politics as well, we might not be living in an authoritarian dystopia.

Featured image via Twitter

By Skwawkbox

Source link

Every day, we use our hands to pick up packages, hug friends, make calls – and touch disease-carrying germs.

“Most gastrointestinal and respiratory infections spread when contaminated hands touch your eyes, nose or mouth,” said Dr. Supriya Rao, a gastroenterologist.

Spraying our hands immediately with hand sanitiser can make all the difference in whether you get a cold the following week.

But first, you need to know which surfaces carry the most germs. The grossest surfaces are never quite what we think. Here are the three biggest culprits most people overlook, according to germ experts:

Advertisement

1. Pin pads

Ekaterina Demidova / Getty Images

Every time you check out a purchase at the supermarket or coffee shop, you are likely tapping a pin pad on a payment terminal to check out what you bought. But this surface has been touched dozens of times by other grimy hands.

Out of all the many items we touch on an everyday basis, microbiologist Jason Tetro, aka “The Germ Guy,” said, pin pads are the most unsuspecting germ carrier.

“In order for you to get the pin number inputted, you have to put pressure, and the pressure is enough to really leave behind a large amount of microbes from your hand,” Tetro said.

Advertisement

“And then there’s such a high turnover that anybody who may not have washed their hands or washed their hands properly” is going to leave germs on that pin pad, he said.

Tetro cited flu and COVID viruses, in addition to salmonella, if someone touched raw meats beforehand, as the big risks of what you can get from a pin pad.

Because a pin pad requires focused pressure, it is a surface “where you’re going to have the greatest threat for transmitting any kind of pathogen,” Tetro said.

2. Trolley handles

Advertisement

Beyond pin pads, consider the unsuspecting surface of a trolley handle. Both Tetro and Rao said the handles in a grocery cart were common culprits for carrying germs.

“It is the one thing that people will overlook more than anything else, because they don’t think about it, because they’re too focused on purchasing” food, Tetro said.

Since the handle is an easy way to transfer viruses, “people will probably end up having a sore throat, or maybe a cold” from touching a germ-filled grocery-cart handle without sanitising their hands after use, Tetro said.

3. Phones

Advertisement

MengWen Guo / Getty Images

For many of us, our phone is attached to us at all times, and picking up germs wherever we go.

“You take it everywhere with you – the grocery store, the bathroom, the airplane, the gym. It’s always with you. And how often do you actually clean it?” Rao said. For Rao, a phone was the dirtiest surface people touch that should make them wash their hands.

Make a point to regularly clean your hands before using your phone. “Ideally people should have clean hands before using their phone and should try and sanitize their phone several times a week,” Rao said.

Until you get a chance to wash your hands, you can also simply use hand sanitiser – if you do it properly. “It usually kills enough, so that you don’t have a chance of getting exposure or sick from what happens to be on your hands,” Tetro said. But he noted that many people don’t use hand sanitiser right, so here’s a quick refresher.

Advertisement

Hand sanitisers often use ethanol to kill germs. And to get the most out of these germ-killers, you should keep your hands damp for 15 seconds after spraying. “A lot of people will just put it on and rub as hard as they can, and will be done in three or four seconds,” Tetro said. But let the hand sanitiser sit on your hands for 15 seconds before letting your hands dry.

Sanitising your hands after touching these three everyday surfaces is a small intervention that can make a big difference in whether you get sick this year.

Every time people report not knowing where they got a cold from, Tetro said he will ask, “Did you use a pin pad? Did you touch your face after you touched the pin pad?” If you did, then you know what to blame.

Source link

Source link